Embed
Email

Tax bracket resolution

Document Sample

Shared by: yaofenji
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
12/1/2011
language:
English
pages:
5
People’s Lobby Draft Fair Tax Brackets Congressional Proposal of 12/1/11

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATE

Proposed for 111th Congress

PROPOSED BILL



To request the Congress enact legislation that will return Fair Tax Brackets to our

decimated economy that will help promote freedom, fairness, and

economic opportunity by returning IRS tax brackets that existed when

America’s middle class and economy grew and prospered.



SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

Returning Fair Tax Brackets to the IRS Act of 2009

Providing tax revenues to rebuild and grow Middle America



SEC. 2 Current Problem

WHEREAS, in 2008 we had 6 marginal tax brackets topping out at

$357,700.

WHEREAS, in 1954 we had 24 marginal brackets and rates ranging

from 20 – 91%.

WHEREAS, when we had progressive rates generations ago on the

very rich, we built the world’s finest road, utility, education, space,

and science infrastructure; and with that came the largest, most

educated, and hardest working middle class the world had known.

WHEREAS, today’s wealth accumulation is more concentrated than in

1999, when the richest 1% (about 2.7 million people) has as much

to spend after taxes as the bottom 100 million.



TRENDS TO RELIEVE MEGA RICH AND BURDEN AN UPPER MIDDLE CLASS WITH

TAXES

WHEREAS, in 1944 the top marginal tax rate on income over $200,000

was 94%.

WHEREAS, in 1954 the top marginal tax rate on income over $400,000

was 91%.

WHEREAS, in 1964 the top marginal tax rate on income over $400,000

was 77%.

WHEREAS, in 1974 the top marginal tax rate on income over 200,000

was 70%, on earned income only it was 50%.

WHEREAS, in 1984 the top marginal tax rate on incomes over

$162,400 was 50%.









D8f6c930-f3bb-43c5-86bb-264ed5d99651.doc D. Hunn 415-383-7880 www.peopleslobby.us 1

WHEREAS, this trend, along with the income cap on Social Security

taxes and the non-indexing of the Alternative Minimum Tax, has

increasingly moved the top federal bracket onto what some

consider upper middle income Americans.

WHEREAS, under this skewed tax structure the super rich, those

taking home incomes high above the $250,000 top bracket, have

controlled increasing amounts of wealth, while the wealth of the

middle class and those below has dramatically shrunk.



WHEREAS, in 1994 the top marginal tax rate on incomes over

$250,000 was 39.6%

WHEREAS, in 2003 the top marginal tax rate on incomes over

$311,950 was 35%.

WHEREAS, in 2008 the top marginal tax rate on income over $357,700

was 35%



WHEREAS, if one assumes an inflation rate of 4% since 1954, then in

2008 the top marginal income bracket would have been $1.2

million.



WHEREAS, the average income of all households in 2000 was $42,700.

WHEREAS, in 2000 the 13,400 households (1/100th of 1%) at the very

top had an average income of $24 MILLION, or 560 times the

average.



WHEREAS, in 1996 the top 400 taxpayers averaged income of $74

million.

WHEREAS, in 2005 the top 400 taxpayers averaged income of $214

million.

WHEREAS, in 2006 the top 400 taxpayers averaged income of $263

MILLION EACH AND,

WHEREAS, on average, those top 400 paid an effective federal income

tax of 17%, much lower than the top proclaimed bracket of 35%.



Sec 3. Rationale for reinstituting Fair Tax Brackets (FTB):



AMERICA’S MIDDLE AMERICAN COMMUNITIES NEED REVENUES

These statistical trends indicate that generations of implementing

an inequitable and unjust tax policy has helped accumulate wealth and

power by a few. In the meantime, the costs of addressing our many

public policy needs has been borne by the growing poor and shrinking

middle class.

Especially in today’s economy, revenues are needed to pump

economic vitality back into our middle class. It is time to raise





D8f6c930-f3bb-43c5-86bb-264ed5d99651.doc D. Hunn 415-383-7880 www.peopleslobby.us 2

revenues from the mega wealthy that can help address community

needs, strengthen community infrastructure, and help rebuild

America’s middle class, which is the engine that will again drive and

rebuild a smarter Americans economy.

Part of the revenues raised from instituting these fair tax brackets

will be earmarked and recycled into involving Americans of all

economic classes in direct service and learning on national and

international needs, so that our long term public policy costs and

blunders will be reduced.

Since Vietnam, we have irresponsibly continued funding wars on

our national and personal credit cards. The illogical Communist empire

fell from the added burden of fighting frugal terrorists whose dad to

day life hardened them against a plasticized life. Now our economic

system, based on a skewed tax base that rewards gimmickry

production and the over comfortably ensconced rich over building and

hard working Middle Americans, is poised to have the strategy of

frugal terrorists topple what was once a revered, civil, and thoughtful

economic system. The FTB reform is part of the process that returns

us to a fairer tax system that once helped build a strong and logical

economy that earned the world’s respect. While doing so, it set asides

some of the revenues raised via the new FTBs to ensure that the

AWSC service learning programs builds peace, health, and vision at

home and abroad.



Sec 4. Proposal to reinstitute Fair Tax Bracket that grew a

robust Middle Class



Therefore, be it resolved that this bill will add two tax brackets the

revenues from which will help promote economic freedom, fairness,

and growth opportunities for America’s middle, lower, and upper

classes.



A. An IRS tax bracket will be added so that those amounts

earned over $20 million annually will be taxed at a 50% flat

rate

B. An IRS tax bracket will be added so that those amounts

earned over $50 million annually will be taxed at a 70% flat

rate.

C. These will be flat tax rate brackets with no deductions, so

that loopholes do not allow the effective tax rate to be

significantly less than IRS codes purportedly call for on the

rich.



Sec 5. Directed use of a portion of FTB additional revenues:





D8f6c930-f3bb-43c5-86bb-264ed5d99651.doc D. Hunn 415-383-7880 www.peopleslobby.us 3

HEALTHY EARMARKING OF SOME OF THE FTB RAISED REVENUES

Peaceful, productive community and international service builds the

experience and character that drives a nation to pursue smart, cost

effective, and entrepreneurial public policies.

America’s wealth and ensuing power has been built on the

shoulders of Americans of various ethnicities and economic classes.

Too often during peaks of American affluence, we forget how America’s

national strength resulted from a plethora of individual, community,

state, and national efforts.

If the traditional and nontraditional funding mechanisms defined in

the AWSC Congressional Proposal should fall short of fully funding the

AWSC, this FTB proposal will earmark funds to involve 21 million

Americans in voluntary national service at home and abroad via the

American World Service Corps (AWSC) Congressional Proposals,



THEREFORE, this proposal will set aside a significant portion of

revenues raised from implementing these tax brackets to be assigned

to cover the healthy investment for at least the next 27 years in

community and international service programs such as those proposed

under the American World Service Corps (AWSC) Congressional

Proposals, which Congresswoman Woolsey has offered to introduce in

the 111th Congress. The key AWSC proposed bill is at

http://www.worldservicecorps.us/world%20service%20key%20proposal%202yr%

20volunteer.htm



Sec 6. Impact of earmarking some revenues to robust AWSC

service learning



The FTB revenues earmarked to fund AWSC programs will involve

many, many more Americans in peaceful, productive service learning.

Earmarking such FTB revenues will smarten our long and short-term

public policies in every state and while simultaneously building our

national character and world image.



Sec 7. Cost:

There is little or no cost in reinstating these fair tax brackets to the

IRS Code and changing IRS forms to reflect the changes.



Sec 8. Revenue Flows:

In 2001, the top 1% of households controlled 39.7% of the

financial wealth of America. Wealth, and the power that accompanies

it, has been growing disproportionately for about a generation. It is

time to direct some of that concentrated wealth flows into





D8f6c930-f3bb-43c5-86bb-264ed5d99651.doc D. Hunn 415-383-7880 www.peopleslobby.us 4

strengthening America’s physical, moral, and intellectual infrastructure

now and for the long term.

The implementation of these tax brackets could yield substantial

revenues to involve all Americans in doing good at home and abroad.

Such service learning involvement develops the analytical minds that

will produce smart short and long term productive solutions, ventures,

and businesses that build and maintain economies that benefit all

economic classes. While implementing these tax fair brackets, those

living with the FTB adjusted net income will still have a very

comfortable lifestyle.

Some graphic documentation for this proposed bill can be found at:

http://worldservicecorps.us/tax_bracket_reform.htm









D8f6c930-f3bb-43c5-86bb-264ed5d99651.doc D. Hunn 415-383-7880 www.peopleslobby.us 5



Related docs
Other docs by yaofenji
6-20-11BdPacket
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Photo Album - Freepages
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
SKMBT_C30009011411170
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
platnick
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
11_Chevrolet_2013_Malibu Safety_120711 V3
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
On site Interviews_6.11
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
NOAA-PMEL DART Workshop
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
budget_presentation_2010-11
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!