FUND CODE 777-C: ARRA TITLE IID TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GRANTS:
DESIGN, DEVELOP, AND DELIVER (3 Ds) ONLINE COURSES
Reviewer: ___________________________________________ Date of Review: ______________
(Out of 100 Points)
Criteria Not Marginal Acceptable Very Maximum Points
Acceptable Good Points Awarded:
A. Need and Rationale for Design, Development, and Delivery 20
of the Course
1. Identified the course (one of the courses listed in
Attachment A) that would be developed, piloted,
and delivered in partnership with WGBH
2. Described why the course was selected and how
the course would meet the needs of the applying
district, partnering districts, and other districts.
B. Planning and Development of the Partnership 20
1. Described the planning that took place with district
staff, staff from partner districts, service providers.
a. Provided the following information: dates of
planning meetings; names and roles of persons
involved and results and agreements.
b. Provided an explanation if the project does not
partner with other districts or providers.
2. Estimated the number of course participants from the
applicant district and partnering districts; identified
anticipated participants’ grade level(s) and content
C. Project Personnel 20
1. Identified members of a team to collaborate with
WGBH and the Department on course design,
development and implementation, including the
following roles, at a minimum:
a. Project Coordinator – This person will be
responsible for coordinating the district’s activities,
responding to information requests from WGBH
and/or the Department, attending all scheduled
meetings with the Department and WGBH, and
administrating the budget.
b. Lead Content Developer/Reviewer – This
person will collaborate with the Department and
WGBH during the development of the course. This
may involve developing portions of the course
content, reviewing course content created by
WGBH and/or the Department, collecting
comments on course content from other district
personnel (as appropriate), and attending
scheduled meetings with the Department and
c. Additional content reviewers – These should
include at least one person from each partnering
district and may include additional educators from
the lead district. These people will be responsible
for reviewing and providing comments on course
materials. They may attend the meetings with the
Department and WGBH, but they are not required
to do so.
2. Listed the current position and contact information for
all project personnel. Attached resumes for the Project
Coordinator and Lead Content Developer.
3. Indicated the number of hours per month that each
person would devote to this project, if funded.
D. Project Activities and Timeline
1. Described the process of recruiting and selecting
participants to take the course. Also described how
the project would ensure the commitment of
participants in this project.
2. Described how the district would ensure that
participants would be able to access MassONE (the
course(s) will be delivered in MassONE Moodle). Also
identified possible instructors who have the level of
content knowledge and technology skills to be able to
effectively teach the course.
3. Provided a detailed timeline and activity chart for this
E. Budget Description 10
1. Completed Part II - Budget Detail Pages (Include both
pages) and the Budget Narrative Form
2. Provided a detailed budget narrative that is aligned
with the Part II - Budget Detail Pages. The budget is
tied clearly to the scope and requirements of the
project and is focused on expenses related to
expanding participants’ knowledge, such as costs for
instructors and instructional materials.
PROPOSAL SUMMARY COMMENTS
Specific programmatic changes recommended: