Embed
Email

EB5 retained earnings

Document Sample
EB5 retained earnings
Shared by: HC1112011044
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
13
posted:
12/1/2011
language:
English
pages:
1
TRUE, WALSH & MILLER, LLP

Attorneys at Law

Peter J. Walsh The Commons Of Counsel

Sally T. True 202 East State Street, Seventh Floor

R. James Miller Ithaca, New York 14850 Fred Weinstein

John Moss Hinchcliff Constance E. Cook

Elena Salerno Flash Stephen Yale-Loehr

Rosanne Mayer Roger B. Sovocool

George R. Pfann, Jr.

David A. Tyler

Hilary T. Fraser Telephone: (607) 273-4200

Laurie M. Johnston Fax: (607) 272-6694

E-mail: syl@twmlaw.com

Adam R. Schaye Internet: www.twmlaw.com

Joanna R. Garrard

Carolyn S. Lee

Mary J. Schubert



December 1, 2011



Via email and regular mail



Efren Hernandez

Office of Program and Regulation Development

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Department of Homeland Security

425 Eye Street, NW (ULLICO Building third floor)

Washington, DC 20536



Re: EB-5 Retained Earnings Question



Dear Efren:



As you know, the CIS takes the position that an EB-5 investor cannot use retained

earnings from the corporation as part of his investment. A federal court upheld

this interpretation in 2003. Kenkhuis v. INS, Civil Action No. 3:01-CV-2224-N,

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3334 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2003). My question concerns investors

who invested retained earnings before the federal court decision. Nothing in the

EB-5 regulations explicitly prohibits using retained earnings as part of their

capital investment, so investors had no idea before 2003 that they were not

following the law. Now that they know the law, can they put in new, fresh money

to overcome the prior retained earnings money?



This most often will come up in I-829 petitions, as those are the investors who

originally made their investments before the CIS interpretation on retained

earnings became known. The I-829 regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 216.6(a)(4)(ii) do not

necessarily require that the full $1 million was invested as of the date the I-829

was filed; the regulations only require that the individual was “actively in the

process of investing the requisite capital.” Thus, I believe it should be

acceptable for an I-829 investor to put in new money to overcome disallowed prior

retained earnings.



I look forward to your views on this subject.



Sincerely,







Stephen Yale-Loehr

Pc: Morrie Berez


Related docs
Other docs by HC1112011044
Regionalism Conference Summary
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
S M I
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
lea06013 smp
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
C O L Z A
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
COPERTINA
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 0
Raum 2004 l
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
International Poplar Commission
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Slide 1
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
02HS0029
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Strategie ANP- forma pt
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!