Public Opinion
Braunwarth
POSC 121
Political Culture
What is it?
The opinion of the public on
political and social issues
How is it affected by Political Culture?
We basically all share the Classical Liberal focus
on self-interested, reasoning individuals
The Framers borrowed from Locke who drew on
the ideas of Descartes
Descartes popularized the idea of individual
reason which made possible the enlightenment
and the scientific revolution
Classical Liberalism
This way of thinking is well suited to our
economic (capitalism) and political (democracy)
systems
However, not all societies have gone through
the same process of enlightenment
Is it inevitable that this process (and capitalism
and democracy) will spread?
Religious fundamentalism and it’s reliance on
faith over fallible individual reasoning dominates
many societies and even many groups here
Shaping Individual Opinions
Most fundamental political beliefs and
ideologies are formed early
What are the primary agents of political
Socialization?
Family
Schools
Fundamental National Circumstances
Social Categories
What characteristics are salient in shaping
Public Opinion? How?
Race
Opinions differ regarding the extent of racial
progress
Gender
Women are slightly less likely to advocate war
and more likely to vote Democrat
Social Categories
Age
Generally reflects the conditions under which
they were socialized
Religion
The “God Gulf” is dramatic with the religiously
observant voting Republican
Social Categories
In general, the more urban, the
more liberal
The South is the most
conservative region of the
country
This is related to class
Income is more concentrated in
the U.S. than in any other
Western Democracy
But Americans are less aware of
class divisions than others
Lower class tends to be more
concerned with personal
morality
Upper class tends to be more
supportive of civil liberty issues
Public Opinion
Public Opinion is just that, opinion.
It is a “social fact” not a “brute fact”
It need not be based on hard data or be
objectively true
So why should we care about P.O.?
This is a democracy and Public Opinion is
still one of the primary inputs that shapes
public policy
The Quality of Public Opinion is thus
important
Public Knowledge
Are citizens doing their job?
Take the following quiz:
Who is your Congressional Representative?
Who are your state’s two Senators?
Who is the U.S. Secretary of State?
Who is the U.S. Secretary of the Interior?
Who is your representatives to either the state
Assembly or the State Senate?
Who is Chloe Kardashian or Robert Pattinson?
Why do we know more about some of these than
others?
What the media chooses to emphasize (Neil Postman,
Amusing Ourselves to Death)
John Kenneth Galbraith
"We Associate truth with convenience," he wrote, "with
what closely accords with self-interest and personal well-
being or promises best to avoid awkward effort or
unwelcome dislocation of life. We also find highly
acceptable what contributes the most to self-esteem."
Economic and social behaviors, Galbraith continued,
"are complex, and to comprehend their character is
mentally tiring. Therefore we adhere, as though to a raft,
to those ideas which represent our understanding.“
In sum, Public Opinion/“conventional wisdom” is always
1. Easily understandable
2. Reinforces our self-esteem
Public Opinion in a complex
world
Is the world that simple?
No, but individuals seek easily
understandable, self-satisfying explanations
Public Opinion may be simplistic but it still
drives policy in our democracy
However, it is not just a one-way street
Constructing Public Opinion in
a Complex World
Political actors (politicians, interest groups,
etc.) are eager to construct explanations that
reinforce certain positions
Is it possible for a politician to take the high
road and address the complexity of political
issues?
Or will he be defeated by someone promising
a simple explanation that reinforces the self-
esteem of the audience?
Plato’s Allegory of the Cave
How do people feel when their illusions have
been shattered?
Examples?
Are they happy to be enlightened?
If enlightened, will they be eager to go back
an educate their fellows?
Image>Substance
Take a moment and list attributes of two prominent
politicians
Chances are these are based on messages
popularized by the media but probably have little to
do that individual’s ability to govern
We are not computers and do not view the world
from a purely rational perspective
Opinion is often based on “image”, emotions, and
impressions rather than substantive political issues
It may be “rule by the people” but large numbers of
people are uninformed or misled or just don’t care
Is being “beer-worthy” a good
reason to vote for a politician?
How about someone who
“looks presidential”?
Or “sounds strong”?
What about “trustworthy”? Are
you going to be lending them
money until payday?
Culture of Fear
What kinds of things, are people warned to
be afraid of?
Are these likely threats?
So what; why should we care if people are
afraid of things over which they have little
control and are not likely to affect them?
It prevents them from addressing real political
concerns upon which they can make an
impact.
(Same argument applies to sports)
Cynicism
Do people tend to trust government or do
they think that government is “the problem
and not the solution” and that politicians are
merely “a bunch of crooks”?
Such opinions are widespread even though
the vast majority of politicians are concerned
about the public good.
What effect does this have on democratic
politics?
Limits the ability of government to provide
positive action for society
John Stuart Mill: On Conformity,
Individuality, and Liberty
Under what circumstances can one
interfere in the actions of another?
Only Self-Protection
Mill worries about the tyranny of
public opinion
For J.S. Mill, very important to be
exposed to a variety of opinions and
a diversity of ideas
“Marketplace of Ideas”
Is there a tyranny of public opinion
in the U.S.? Example?
How are opposing views treated?
Political Ideology
What we accept is often shaped by our
ideology
Our variations of liberalism and conservatism
are unique to the U.S.
These ideologies differ in their acceptance of
government influence in the market and in
private conduct
Liberalism
Theme: Public Morality
Concerned with welfare of others
Everyone is valued
We are our brother’s keeper
“nurturant parent” family model in which the world is a
benevolent place that can be made better
Government necessary to protect people from
vagaries of the market
Government should not favor particular
behaviors or groups (religious, gender, sexual
orientation, etc.)
Conservatism
Theme: Private Morality
Concerned with conduct of others
Traditional Values
We are our own keeper
“strict father” family model in which the world is
dangerous and must be controlled
No Government regulation of the market
Government should endorse precise
standards for private conduct
Neo-Conservativism
Have become more important in the George
W. Bush administration
Share traditional conservative concern for
free market and disdain for big-government
social programs
Also advocate using our vastly superior
military force to alter the world as we want
Ideology
Flip Sides of the Same coin
Conservative Liberal
Human Nature Self-Interest Communal
Resources Scarcity Plenty
Different Lifestyles Restrain Trust
Criminals Retribution Rehabilitate
Taxation Regressive Progressive
Equality Freedom Equality Imp’t
Order Order Imp’t Freedom
Ideology Constructs Reality
“If men define situations as real, they are real
in their consequences” (W. I. Thomas)
If you want to look at reality according to
either perspective, you will find a reality that
conforms to your interpretation
Neither is really “common sense”
Depending how you look at reality, your
actions and interactions will be affected; self-
fulfilling prophecy
Conservatism
Ideological Mainstream of American politics
has shifted to the right
Why has Conservatism benefited from the
growth of talk radio and not Liberalism?
Plays better because it has easy answers
Personal responsibility and self-reliance are
easily understandable and persuasive
This leads to clear, definite and easily
defendable policy stances (less government,
get tough on crime, etc.)
Conservatism and Liberalism
In addition, conservative calls for less
government naturally lend themselves to
negative rhetoric and ads attacking
government and politicians
Liberalism relies on more complex
justifications (social responsibility, etc.) that
does not provide simple black & white answers
This leads to inherently more ambiguous policy
choices (what can government do to enable all
to compete equally?)
Conservatives fight better
Subsequently, conservatives are able to fight
political battles with greater surety and
zealousness
Can you think of any contemporary
examples?
Ideology of the 2008 Presidential Candidates. Left-Right refers to
government involvement in regulating the economy; authoritarian-
libertarian refers to government involvement in regulating social issues
Are you surprised by this graph?
Do Conservatives fight better?