UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Seabasing
and the JCIDS Process
Colonel Greg Cook, USAF
Chief, Studies, Analysis and Gaming Division
Joint Staff J-8
NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference
20 Oct 2004
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Overview
• What is JCIDS?
“Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System”
• Review of New DoD Requirements, Acquisition and Test
Process
• FCBs, JICs, and CBAs
• Seabasing CBA Overview
• JFCOM Seabasing Concepts
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Capabilities Integration and
Development System (JCIDS)
• JCIDS implements a capabilities-based process
– Rigorous, up-front analysis by functionally-focused teams
– More programs (below ACAT I) will get joint visibility
• Nine month (+) development process
• Processes are aligned
– Capability Needs across OSD, Intelligence Community,
National Security Space Architect
– Acquisition process with AT&L, NII, and DoD Space
Acquisition Milestone Decision Authority
– Resource Allocation process
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JCIDS Process Overview
Joint Integrating Concept
Concepts Potential Capability
USMC
Improvement Areas USAF
Joint USN
USA
Operations
Concepts
- Integrated Priority Lists
- Joint Quarterly Readiness Command & Control
Joint Functional Concepts
Review
Battlespace Awareness
- Lessons Learned
Joint Operating
Concepts - Service Programs Force Management
Capability
Joint Functional - Strategic Planning Guidance Protection
Disconnect
Concepts - Joint Experimentation
Focused Logistics
Joint Integrating - ACTDs
JSB Joint Integrating Concept
Concepts
HLS MCO STAB STRAT
OPS DEFT
Joint Operating Concepts
SecDef Joint Chiefs of Staff Joint Requirements Oversight Council
Resource Strategy Capability Roadmap Capability Assessment
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Map Systems to Functions
Sys 1 Sys 3
Sys 2 New Sys Capability Capability
Capability capability Capability
capability
Capability Capability capability
capability capability capability
End of Svc Life FOC Block SLEP
task c
task b b
task d d
task g g
function a
task e e
task cc c
function b
task d d
task g g
task f f
function a
task e e
task a
task f f
function
function
function
function
function
function
function
function
function
Upgrade
function
function
task b
task a
task a
task b
system 1
system 1
task c system 1 1
system2 2
capability system
system
system 2 system 3
system
system32
2014 2012 2010 2008 2006 2004 system 4
system 3 system 4
system 3
system 5
system 5
Training system 4 4
system6
Field New system system 6
Organization Change system 5 75
system
system
system 7
system 6 6
system SV-5
Secretary of Defense Joint Staff and OSD Joint Requirements Oversight Council
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DOD End-to-End
Requirements, Acquisition, and Test Process
DAB Capability Area Reviews (CARs)
• Refined • Affordable
• Strategic • Revise KPPs • LRIP
concept military-useful
Planning
• Analysis of increment • Detailed • IOT&E
Guidance Capabilities Based Assessment Alternatives design
• Defense • Technology
Planning • Technology demonstrated • System • LRIP
• Capabilities • Gaps • Non-materiel
Development integration • FOT&E
Scenarios • Tasks • Shortfalls solutions • Initial KPPs
• Family of • Redundancies • Materiel Strategy • DT&E
Attributes • • SEP
Concepts • Metrics • Risk areas solutions • SoS System
• S+T initiatives Engineering
• Transformation • Experimentation
Concept MS “A” MS “B” MS “C”
activity Decision Technology System
Select a Joint Develop Functional *Functional *Functional Analysis of Technology
Technology CD System
System CP Productio
Integrating ICD Development CD Development CP Productio
Concept Concept Area Analysis Needs Analysis Solutions Analysis Alternatives Development
Development CDD
D
Development
Development CPD Production
D n
n
D D
Capability Based Assessment
OSD (AT&L)- Evolutionary or Spiral
A led Capability Development
USM r Navy Roadmaps
C m
y 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
COCOMs Air
OSD/JCS
FCB
COCOM
OSD
(AT&L)
Force
DIA
task a
Services
task b
OSD OSD
(NII) (PA&E) task c
oversight
SecDef Joint Chiefs of Staff & Joint Requirements Oversight Council Joint Staff /(OSD)
Joint Staff OSD
OSD (AT&L, PA&E), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC)
Policy Capabilities Definition Concept Refinement Acquisition and Test
*“as is”
Roadmaps
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
task a
task b
task c
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Functional Capabilities Board
• Responsible for the organization, analysis, and
prioritization of joint warfighting capabilities
• Lead coordinating body to ensure that the joint
force is best served throughout the JCIDS and
acquisition process
Advisory Body to the JCB and JROC on Joint
and JCIDS Initiatives
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Functional Capabilities Board Portfolios
Force Application Battlespace Awareness Protection Force Management
• Land, maritime, air • All source Intel collection • Personnel and • Readiness
and space ops • Environmental data infrastructure • Joint Manning
• Joint targeting collection protection • Global Posture
• Conventional attack • Predictive analysis • CND
• AC/RC
• Nuclear attack • Knowledge management • Counter- proliferation
• Force Generation
• CNA • Non-proliferation
• Electronic attack • Consequence • Command
Relationships
• PSYOPS management
• Special ops • Global Visibility of
force structure
• Joint fires
issues
• SEAD
• Force Management
• Military deception
Data Construct
• Building Global
Force Management
(GFM) Capability
Net-Centric Command and Control Focused Logistics • Seabasing
• Comms and • COP • Deployment
computer • JFC2 distribution
environment • Sustainment
• Own force info
collection • Medical
• Mobility
• Logistics C2
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Integrating Concept
Definition:
• A description of how a Joint Force Commander integrates
functional means to achieve operational ends.
• Includes a list of essential battlespace effects (including
supporting tasks, measures of effectiveness, and measures
of performance) and a CONOPS for integrating these
effects together to achieve the desired endstate
Purpose:
• Initiates Capability Based Assessments
• Describes the Joint Force Commander’s future operating
environment, how the force will be used to accomplish
objectives
• Integrates Joint functional capabilities in the context of a
JOC (e.g., MCO-JUSS)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Relationship Between Current JICs
Win the Major Combat Operation
(MCO JOC)
Conduct Global Strikes Operate from Seabasing
(Global Strike JIC) (Seabasing JIC)
Set Conditions for Apply Gain & Close & Plan & Task Employ Sustain the Reconstitute
Follow-On/ Coercive Maintain Assemble Joint Force Ops Joint Combat Joint Force the
Decisive Ops Pressure Access to the the (Joint C2 JIC) Power (Joint Log Joint Force
Theater Joint Force (Global Strike JIC)
& JFEO JICs)
Gain Air Superiority Gain Maritime Superiority
Suppress the Defeat A/C, Defeat Undersea
Integrated Air CMs & BMs Defeat Threats
Defense System (IAMD JIC) SurfaceThreats (JUSS JIC)
Destroy A/C Passively Shoot down
Sink Subs Sink Subs & Clear Mines
CMs & Defend A/C, CMs, &
at Sea Minelayers in
BMs prior to Key Targets & BMs
Port
launch and Infrastructure in Flight
supporting
infrastructure
Effects Chain/Kill Chain/Mission Thread
Detect – Track – Identify – Decide/Task – Engage/Attack - Assess
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JIC to CBA Process Highlights
Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5
Joint Integrating
Concept Development Capabilities-Based Assessment
Resourcing & FAA FNA FSA Campaign-
TOR – Capabilities – Gaps – Determine initial Non- level
Development – Tasks – Shortfalls materiel & Materiel Analysis
– Attributes – Redundancies Alternatives
– Metrics – Risk Areas – Recommend a prioritized Experimentation
Concept Development capability approach to Inputs/Recs
• Tasks meet the need, including
• Capabilities initial TRL, sustainability,
• Attributes supportability, schedule of Solutions
• Metrics delevery, and affordability –Material
• Concurrent Development of assessments –Non-Material
DPS-based vignette – Assess operational risk of
each approach
– Consider S&T Initiatives
– ID Experimentation needs
Army
USMC Navy
COCOM
or COCOMs Air Force
Service OSD
(AT&L)
FCBs DIA
OSD OSD
(NII) (PA&E)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Seabasing CBA Task
• Conduct a Capability Based Assessment of Seabasing in 2015
Homeland Stability Strategic
Security Operations Deterrence
Major Combat
Operations
Seize the
Initiative
This context …
Operational
Access
Operational Access
Undersea Forcible Sea Basing Global IAMD
Superiority Entry Strike
JUSS JFEO
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Seabasing CBA Plan of Attack
JROC
Wargame
FM FCB FM FCB Outbrief FM FCB FM FCB FM FCB FM FCB FSA & Recommendations
TOR Plan of Attack Capabilities FAA, M&S, Data Call SV-5X FNA, DOTMLPF FM FCB JROC
O-6 GOFO
& Lit Review JCB
Wargame Outbrief JCB IPR
CBA Team Table Top M&S Scenarios
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY
O-6
Initial Mtg Workshops #1 #2 #3
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Literature Review Data Call VFT Modeling/Analysis Draft Final Rpt
Scenario Development Modeling & Simulation
JIC / TOR Seabasing Capabilities Based Assessment
Development Functional Area Analysis Functional Needs Analysis Functional Solutions Analysis
Wargame the JIC
/ Staffing (FAA) ( FNA) ( FSA)
FAA FNA FSA
– Capabilities – Gaps – Non-Materiel & Materiel
– Tasks – Shortfalls Alternatives
– Attributes – Redundancies – S&T Initiatives
– Metrics – Risk Areas – Experimentation
Capabilities Based Assessment:
– What Joint Seabasing capability does the JFC need in 2015?
– What is the objective for that capability? Where are the gaps?
– What material & non-material solutions meet that capability?
– Which solutions provide the greatest benefit to the JFC?
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
J8 Seabasing CBA Wargame
Purpose:
• Scope the seabasing concept for the CBA
• Provide joint input to further refine the JIC
• Expose / educate a large joint body to seabasing concepts
Objectives:
• Obtain Joint Force Commander inputs on seabasing
• Identify and test potential seabasing CONOPs
• Determine which 2015 capabilities (forces/assets) might be
involved in a CoCom CONOPs that uses seabasing concepts
• Understand feasibility of executing a CONOPs with seabasing
• Determine how an enemy might react to seabasing and obtain
initial threat-based risk assessment
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Baseline Assumptions
• Timeframe: 2015
• Focus: Operational Level of War
• Force Structure: Joint forces based on Multi-
Service Force Data (MSFD)
• CONOPS: based on Defense Planning Scenario(s)
• Context: Seize the Initiative Phase of MCO
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JFCOM Joint Seabasing
“Experimentation Hypothesis”
IF a coherently joint expeditionary force is rapidly deployed,
employed, sustained, and reconstituted/redeployed from a
joint sea base,
AND operations/logistics are interrelated and networked
through an adaptive command and control infrastructure,
AND with the necessary connectors and interdependent
nodes/platforms/capabilities,
THEN sufficient combat power can be applied earlier to
deter conflict and rapidly set the conditions for defeating an
adaptive, asymmetric adversary in a distributed, anti-
access/area denial environment, thereby leading to earlier
conflict resolution
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
How “Joint” is Joint Seabasing?!!
“Deconflicted”
“Interoperable”
“Interdependent”
JOINT SEA BASING
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Seabasing CONOPS (JFCOM perspective)
Joint C2/
“Sea Based Rapid Response Force” Joint Force Protection
Task organized; BDE (++) (Sea Shield, “Land Shield”, “Air Shield”)
Navy CSG
USCG Deepwater USMC ESG
Tailored Joint Capabilities
Packages
“JMPF(F)” Combat Log
(Army AABDE/ARF) Force - CLF
JOINT
“JMPF(F)” Joint Force Projection,
(USMC MEB) Sea Base Sustainment, & Reconstitution
“JMPF(F)”
(USAF AEF) Global
Strategic & Operational Air Distribution
Multi-national & Sealift Connectors System
“JSV”, etc
“JMPF(F)” – Joint Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future)
“JSV” – Joint Support Vessel
(common platforms/tailored load-out)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Creating Desired Effects
NOT sequential! FORCIBLE
ENTRY
SHAPING EARLY ENTRY TRANSITION
Through adaptive Joint C2, the JFC
ss senses changes in capabilities
s required to create desired effects,
s
fe
fe
and “morphs” the scalable JSB to
respond (“Sense & Respond”)
s s
s fe
s
Desired fe s
effects ee
fe ee
fe s ee
ee
ee
t
ee t s
Continuous
Global t
Reachback t
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
How well do Systems Perform?
Conduct
Conduct
ASW
Joint Force
Operations
Operations
To answer this question, we
need parameters and metrics
Develop Project
Monitor Understand
Understand Interact in a
and
and Execute
the Battle the Net-Centric
Sustain
Choose the Plan
Space Situation Environment
the force
COA
that describe key physical Manage
Collection
Collect
Battle
Space
Develop
Shared
Situational
Conduct
Combat
Assessment
Conduct
Mission
Develop
Courses
Decide on
a Course
Develop
Plans
and
Provide
Leadership
Control
Mobility
Create
Effects
Project
Protect
the
Force
Sustain
the
Force
characteristics of systems
Data Awareness Analysis of Action of Action
Orders
Function 1 Function 2 Function 3 Function 4 Function 5
COCOM System 1 System 1 System 1 System 1
MCC System 2 System 2 System 2 System 2 Supported
System 3 System 3
System 4 System 4 System 4
Component
System 5 System 5
System 6 System 6
ACC
System 7 System 7
CJTF System 8 System 8 System 8
System 9 System 9
GCC
System 7 System 7
Supporting
SOCC
Components
System 12 System 12
System 13 System 13
Other Supporting System 14 System 14
CoComs & Agencies System 15 System 15 System 15
System 16 System 16 System 16
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
We’ve got Gaps!! . . . So What?
•Helps to answer the
Robust Function 4
“so what?” question
Function 5
•Puts identified gaps
into perspective
Effective •Starting point for
discussions of
Function 1
relative risk
Function 2
Function 3
Insufficient
Catastrophic Extensive Major Substantial Modest Minor
Severity of Impact
Risk Associated with Each Function Must Be Considered to Frame
Subsequent Solutions Analysis and Resource Allocation Decisions
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JCIDS Lessons Learned
• Developing and organizing tasks/capabilities prior to any
writing provides disciplined approach
• Use available resources (OPLANs, UJTL, studies, etc)
• Use DPS scenarios; they provide the most challenging
threat and add the most rigor to concept
• Get all stakeholders involved; avoid surprises
– Transparency: Web sites, e-mail, conferences, workshops, etc
• Feedback: Get GO/FO visibility early and often
• Maintain objectivity, joint perspective
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DOD End-to-End
Requirements, Acquisition, and Test Process
DAB Capability Area Reviews (CARs)
• Refined • Affordable
• Strategic • Revise KPPs • LRIP
concept military-useful
Planning
• Analysis of increment • Detailed • IOT&E
Guidance Capabilities Based Assessment Alternatives design
• Defense • Technology
Planning • Technology demonstrated • System • LRIP
• Capabilities • Gaps • Non-materiel
Development integration • FOT&E
Scenarios • Tasks • Shortfalls solutions • Initial KPPs
• Family of • Redundancies • Materiel Strategy • DT&E
Attributes • • SEP
Concepts • Metrics • Risk areas solutions • SoS System
• S+T initiatives Engineering
• Transformation • Experimentation
Concept MS “A” MS “B” MS “C”
activity Decision Technology System
Select a Joint Develop Functional *Functional *Functional Analysis of Technology
Technology CD System
System CP Productio
Integrating ICD Development CD Development CP Productio
Concept Concept Area Analysis Needs Analysis Solutions Analysis Alternatives Development
Development CDD
D
Development
Development CPD Production
D n
n
D D
Capability Based Assessment
OSD (AT&L)- Evolutionary or Spiral
A led Capability Development
USM r Navy Roadmaps
C m
y 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
COCOMs Air
OSD/JCS
FCB
COCOM
OSD
(AT&L)
Force
DIA
task a
Services
task b
OSD OSD
(NII) (PA&E) task c
oversight
SecDef Joint Chiefs of Staff & Joint Requirements Oversight Council Joint Staff /(OSD)
Joint Staff OSD
OSD (AT&L, PA&E), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC)
Policy Capabilities Definition Concept Refinement Acquisition and Test
*“as is”
Roadmaps
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
task a
task b
task c
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Questions?
UNCLASSIFIED