Embed
Email

LEADERSHIP

Document Sample
LEADERSHIP
Shared by: HC111129115256
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
21
posted:
11/29/2011
language:
English
pages:
20
LEADERSHIP









HED 362 – L. Good

Why do we need leadership?



“You don’t need leadership to eat a warm

cookie. The only reason for leadership is to

convince people to do things that are either

dangerous or stupid. Generally speaking,

wherever there is leadership, there’s lots of

hollering and a few warm cookies. Let’s enjoy

the lack of leadership while we have it.”

Scott Adams Don’t Step in the Leadership







HED 362 – L. Good

Leaders



Think of the most effective leader

you have known

 Traits



 Situation



Think of the most ineffective leader

you have known

 Traits



 Situation



HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Theories



Trait Theories

 1920’s – 1950’s



 Personal characteristics

Intelligence, dominance, alertness

 Leaders born not made

 No cause and effect between

leadership and traits

HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Qualities



Honesty

 Single most important ingredient is

integrity

 Measured by observing behavior



Forward Looking (Vision)

 Senseof direction

 Concern for future



HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Qualities



Inspiring

 Enthusiastic, energetic, positive

 Cheerleader



Competent

 Capable and effective to lead toward

goals

 Not a specialist in all areas – but takes

time to learn

 “Value-added” competence HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Qualities



Fair-minded

Supportive

Broad-minded

Intelligent









HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Theories

Behavioral Theories

 Late 1940’s - 1950’s

 Behavior vs. traits



U of M studies

 Production centered

 Employee centered

 PC less effective actual performance



HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Theories



Ohio State studies

 Initiating structure

Well defined job guidelines, channels

of communication

 Consideration

Emphasizes trust, respect, rapport,

participatory decision making

HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Theories



Ohio State studies – findings

 Higher Initiating Structure yielded high

proficiency ratings but more employee

grievances

 Higher Consideration yielded lower

proficiency but lower absences





HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Theories



Contingency/Situational

Theories

 Attention to the situation in

which leaders function

 Trait and behavioral

theories were inadequate





HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Theories



Fiedler’s Contingency Model

 Group Performance contingent upon

Motivational system of leader



Task vs relationship



Degree to which leader has power

and influence in a situation



HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Theories



3 situational factors

 Leader-member relationship

Trust, confidence, respect for leader

 Task structure

Clarity of specific job

 Position power

Inherent in leadership position

HED 362 – L. Good

Case



Individual has 8 subordinates who like

him. He structures the job by making

work assignments and by setting goals

for required outputs. He is also

responsible for reviewing the work of

subordinates and is the main

spokesperson for and evaluator of the

employees at merit review time.

HED 362 – L. Good

Case



Is leader member relationship good

or poor?

 Good



Is task-structure high or low?

 High



Is position power strong or weak?

 Strong

HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Types



Transformational leaders – Bezos, Gates

 Seek higher level needs- self-

actualization

 Internal rewards – big risks/big changes



 Vision- motivation for followers



 Charisma



 Inspirational motivation – work for

larger good of organization HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Types

Transactional leaders –Clinton

 Exchange process – rewards/benefits for

motivation/productivity

 Contingent reward system- carrot/stick



 Smaller changes, lower risks



 MBO



 Autocratic



 Correct by negative feedback/discipline

HED 362 – L. Good

Self-actualization





Aesthetic Transformational

Leadership helps

Knowledge/understanding

you aim here

Self-esteem



Love/Belonging

Transactional

Safety Mgt. gives these

Basic Needs

HED 362 – L. Good

Primary Differences between Transformational

& Transactional Leadership



Categories Transactional Transformational

Leader’s source Rank, position Character, competence

of power

Follower reaction Compliance Commitment



Time frame Short term Long term



Rewards Pay, promotion, etc. Pride, self-esteem, etc.

Supervision Important Less important



Counseling focus Evaluation Development



Where change occurs Follower behavior Follower attitude, values



Where “leadership” Leader’s behavior Follower’s heart

found

HED 362 – L. Good

LEADERSHIP - Types



Servant Leaders (many

unknown leaders)

 Leaders serve followers



 Listens well – concerned

with all

 Do not necessarily strive

to be leaders



HED 362 – L. Good


Related docs
Other docs by HC111129115256
2 Day Fast Track to g
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
PowerPoint ??
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
Arrays and Addressing Modes
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Chapter14
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
VULNERABLE WITNESS OFFICER PILOT
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
C V Vanessa Santos
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 0
No Slide Title
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Section 23 - Residential Load Cycling Program
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!