Embed
Email

group2 NPO LtScat

Document Sample
group2 NPO LtScat
Shared by: HC111129051051
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
11/28/2011
language:
English
pages:
16
Light Scattering

Rayleigh Scattering &

Mie Scattering

Theory

• Characteristics of Polystyrene and Sulphur Nanoparticles.

-- Non absorbing

-- Refractive index is a weak function of wavelength.

• How does light interact with objects?

-- Reflection (light deviated from its original path)

-- Refraction

-- Diffraction

-- Absorption (light absorbed and converted to heat)

Theory Cont…

• A collimated light source is the most basic tool for nanoparticle work.

Often called a Tyndall beam.

• The Tyndall effect is the scattered path of light observed in the

suspension. Examples: Milk, smoke, Lake Thunderbird.



• Scattering Plane

-- The scattering plane is defined by the two rays involved, the source-

particle ray and the particle-observer ray.

-- The scattering plane is determined by observation, it is not fixed in

space. For example, if the observer moves, the scattering plane will

move with the observer.

Theory Cont….

• Theory of Rayleigh

-- Particles are treated as electric dipole.

• Results:

-- I 1/ λ4 (only true if the refractive index is a weak function of λ, i.e. not a

metal.)

-- I r6

-- scattered light at 90° is linearly polarized perpendicular to the scattering

plane.

Verticle Source Horizontal Source

Polarization Polarization

Theory Cont…

• Mie Scattering

-- Absorption and Scattering by a Sphere.

-- Multipole expansion (EM modes of a sphere)

-- electric dipole.

-- magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole.

-- magnetic quadrupole, electric octupole.

• If d < λ/20 then only the first term (dipole) is needed. In this limiting case,

Mie’s theory reduces to Rayleigh’s theory.

• Efficiency factors: Qsca, Qabs, Qext

– Plot Qext vs λ for the extinction spectra

– Qsca and Qabs vs λ show their contribution to Qext.

• Intensity for perpendicular and parallel polarized light

– Plot I vs θ for the angular intensity dependence for each polarization.

Objective

• Learn about Scattering plane

• The Polarization of Rayleigh Scattering

• Mie Scattering

• Angular Dependence

Procedure

Rayleigh scattering

• Using a light source and polarization lens

we observed the way light rays are

polarized through rayleigh scattering in

different solutions: Silica SOL, Sulfur SOL

and Fine Sulfur particles, by shining the

light source through the solutions



• Shine light source though solutions in a

dark room



• Place polarized lens in path of light source

to observe polarization effects of scattered

light in the scattering plane and outside of

scattering plane, I.E. view from top (90

degrees) and other angles of observation

Higher Order Tyndall Spectra (HOTS)



• Using the same procedure to observe the

Rayleigh scattering effects, observe the

different colors associated with the scattered

light and observe angle dependency

• Note the number of orders in each sample,

one order is one color change from red to

green

Scattering Angle

• Using the Helium Neon laser apparatus

(wavelength = 543.5 mm) the laser beam

was shone through our samples of Laser

polystyrene latex

• The samples were placed at an angle on

the observation stage to avoid multiple

reflection of the laser beam in the same

area of the solution Sample

• Note the minimum intensity zones in the

scattered light by observing in the Observation

horizontal plane and recording the angle

these minima occur. This was done by

stage with

observing from about 35 degrees to 145 angle

degrees from the laser beam in the

scattering plane. See picture

measurement

site

Optical Microscopy

• Using an optical microscope in dark field

observation mode, observe the nanoparticles

in each of the three samples

• Note their movement and size (each sample

resembles a night sky filled with stars, the

particles can be seen but not studied in

detail)

Dark-Field

Optical Microscopy

•A central obstruction

blocks the central cone.

•The sample is only

illuminated by the

marginal rays.

•These marginal rays must

be at angles too large for

the objective lens to

collect.

•Only light scattered by the

object is collected by the

lens.

OU NanoLab/NSF NUE/Bumm & Johnson www.microscopy.fsu.edu

Results: Rayleigh Scattering

• Silica SOL

– With the vertical polarization lens in place we noticed there is no angular

dependence in the scattering plane

– By using a second polarization lens at a 90 degree angle we verified that

the light is polarized perpendicular to the scattering plane



• Sulphur SOL

– Using the same techniques we noted the HOTS followed slightly different

result patterns, there was significantly more forward scattering which

caused the scattered light to blend together and appear simply white

toward larger scattering angles in the scattering plane



• Polystyrene latex

– By observing each of the three samples and noting their order using the

HOTS phenomenon we ranked the sample by particle size from smallest

to largest as follows: Sample C, Sample B, Sample A (This initial ranking

seemed to be correct according to our scattering angle experiment data)

Observation

Sample Gaurav Trevor Ye

A 50 49 85

74 73 98

98 100 105

124



B 54 54 50

96 96 98



C 141 141 141

Results: Scattering Angle

• Sample C

– No minimum were found in this sample although the intensity

significantly decreased as the viewing angle decreased, this result is

consistant with the Mie plot data

– Estimated particle size <240 nm



• Sample B

– Minima recorded at scattering angles of 54 and 96 degrees

– Estimated particle size  600nm



• Sample A

– Minima recorded at 50, 74 and 98 degrees

– Estimated particle size  1060 nm

Mie plot results

Sample A: Particle size = 1060nm Sample C: Particle size < 240nm









~ 50



~74 Intensity decreases as angle increases

~98





Sample B: Particle size = 600nm









~54



~ 96

Experiment discussion

• Experimentally determined particle size

– Sample A: Particle size  1060 nm

– Sample B: Particle size  600 nm

– Sample C: Particle size  < 240 nm

• Error and procedure improvement suggestions

– Lab results were recorded by human observation of three different lab

technicians, humans always make mistakes

• These results could be improved my taking more measurements and averaging

results

• Mono-dispersed vs. Poly-dispersed HOTS

– A more highly dispersed sample would appear more “milky” under

observation, that is to say the light spectrum would be blended together and

appear more like white light instead a showing distinct wavelengths


Related docs
Other docs by HC111129051051
Lab 9a: Photosynthesis in Elodea
Views: 28  |  Downloads: 0
Particles basics
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Danielle Fried
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
valmore
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Getters : From Light Bulbs to Accelerators
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
jul06 diag 55
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Phys100 L24 Zhou
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
The Arts Crafts Home
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!