Embed
Email

cost

Document Sample

Shared by: yaosaigeng
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
3
posted:
11/27/2011
language:
English
pages:
25
Cost of Services





N9205

October 3, 2000

What are the questions?









Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

How much does X cost?



 over time?

 in different places?

 as done by different individuals?

 as compared with the cost of Y?









Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

How is X paid for?



 by whom?

 with what associated

incentives/disincentives?









Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Key concepts



 price elasticity

• Does the demand for a produce

change with a change in price?

 supply and demand curves

• How does supply of a produce

affect demand and vice versa?







Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Key concepts, cont.



 average cost = cost of each

item, calculated by dividing

total cost by number produced

 total cost = all costs of

production

 marginal cost= the average cost

of the next item produced



Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Key concepts, cont.



 costs

• materials, time, profit

 charges

• the price tag

 cost shifting

• charging one customer high enough to

cover unpaid costs of another



Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Key concepts, cont.



 hidden costs/lost opportunity

costs often ignored

• time

• capital investment

• foregone earnings









Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Key concepts, cont.



 Monopoly: only one seller of a

service

 Monopsony: only one buyer of a

service

 Oligopoly: small number of

sellers control market

 Oligopsony: small number of

buyers control market

Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Data sources:



 billing information

 budgets

 annual reports

 patient/individual surveys

 employer surveys







Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

VA cost estimation methods



METHOD DESCRIPTION BENEFITS &

LIMITATIONS

Micro-cost Pseudo-bill, cost- Precise but expensive

function or direct

measure

Average Combines cost & Data easily obtained but

cost utilization data with may not be sensitive to

non-VA relative value all factors

unit

Decision Detailed VA product Very detailed, but must

support cost-allocation be validated; difficult to

system system assess



Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

HCFA decision tree



 Question 1: is there  Q2: Does Medicare

enough evidence to already cover a

show that the medically

service is medically beneficial service

beneficial for a for the same

population? If Y,  condition that’s in

the same

modality? If Y, 





Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

 Q3: Is the new service  Q4: Does the new

substantially more service ‘result in

beneficial, equivalent or lower

substantially less total costs for the

beneficial or just Medicare

about as benefical as population than the

the same modality Medicare-covered

service already alternative?

covered? If same 

Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Zhou et al.



 Illustrative of level of analytic

sophistication often needed

 Should increase potential for

discussion of analysis with

statistician

 Should suggest that carefully

doing the wrong methodology

only leads you astray!

Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Ginsberg et al.



 Objective: examine costs and

benefits of 2 schedules of HIB

vaccine in Israel

 Finding: the costs of the program

exceed the benefits when limited

to the health service costs; when

all social costs are included the

program becomes beneficial

Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Ginsberg cont



 Cost of program

• vaccine

• labor to give

• transportation for vaccine and

nurses

• cold chain costs

• costs of adverse reactions



Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Ginsberg cont



 Benefits of program (cost of disease

minus cost of program)

• ambulatory care

• ER care

• hospitalization

• prophylaxis for contacts

• special ed/long term care for those with

sequelae

Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Ginsberg cont



 Requires knowing attack rate,

secondary infection rate, long

term care issues









Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

McGovern et al



 Descriptive study of long-term

costs

 Workers Comp sample, 1992

 Medical costs from insurers

 Lost wages, etc from state

 Insurance expense estimated

 Lost fringe/household time imputed

Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

McGovern et al



 human capital--individual produces

a stream of output over time

 cost in a base year = total lifetime

cost of all cases injured that year

 direct cost=actual $$ spent

 indirect cost=value of what wasn’t

done

Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

McGovern et al



 Health care worker assault rate:

76/100,000

• Total cost:  $1.9 million

• Cost $31,643/RN; $11,417/aide

 Social services rate: 127/100,000

• Total cost:  $1.5 million

• Cost $30.68/employee; $24,210/case

• Health aide 457/100k; $91.24/case

Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Lanz et al



 Randomized trial

 Single medical practice

 Cost carefully tracked research

costs and several possible

levels of application







Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Lanz et al



 Critique the conclusion:

• Appropriate for and acceptable to

low income,managed care

populations with full benefit

coverage for cancer screening

tests







Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Eilbert et al



 Effort to build toward a national

data base

 Theoretical framework not fully

tested/accepted

 Comparability severely

compromised





Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000

Two useful readings:



 Ferrill MJ 1999 p values and

confidence intervals Drug Facts and

Comparisons NEWS March (20-23)

 Schwartz S, Carpenter KM 1999 The

right answer for the wrong question:

consequences of type III error for

public health research 89:8 (1175-

80)

Columbia University

School of Nursing M6920, Spring 2000



Related docs
Other docs by yaosaigeng
_49AEFA4B-4737-43A3-9750-5AAF48CC4E0F_
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
_micros_ltda_listado_general_de_productos
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Z_Extra_0211
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
ZVL Subcontractor Bid List Registration Form
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
ZipDomains
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
zemin davranisiSİYAH BEYAZ
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
zakon_za_zdraveto
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Z1ServiceContract
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
YPLAResponsibilities
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!