Embed
Email

Best_Practice_ECM_2010

Document Sample

Shared by: linzhengnd
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
11/27/2011
language:
English
pages:
7
Best Practices

Enterprise Content Management

Sherry Roark

4/29/2010

INTRODUCTION



We like most Universities are drowning in documents — from applications for enrollment, student

records, and human resource forms. A clear strategy is needed for our faculty, staff, and departments to

manage their documents throughout their lifecycle.



ECM refers to the technologies, strategies, methods and tools used to capture, manage, store, preserve,

and deliver content and documents related to an organization and its processes.



The four primary categories of ECM include:



o Imaging capture software and scanners needed for paper documents making text

searchable and retrievable



o Workflow automatically routing files to the appropriate places and providing a mechanism

for approvals online



o Collaboration providing communities for team collaboration and making it easy for users to

work together



o Document management using content management software needed for storing, sharing,

security, and accessing



ECM tools allow the management of an enterprise level organization's information. In Information

Technology at the University of Louisville there are four primary tools for ECM to assist in the gathering

and finding of content information. They are SharePoint, KnowledgeLake, Plone, and OnBase.



Each ECM tool has various strengths and weaknesses with respect t o the types of content. Each ECM

tool has been evaluated to create the most successful plan for use by the customer. In this document we

will define each ECM solution and define its intended University use.



The goal of this document of ECM Best Practice is to leverage the strengths of a particular ECM tool and

to create a best practice that will be easy for University departments to follow.

1 Available Solutions



Plone (Public Facing – University Branding) Java or .NET (C#)

Static Content Dynamic Content

Public facing Public facing

Student authentication (LDAP) Student authentication (LDAP)

Simple forms Database supported forms

Automation for the webmaster function Complicated Workflow

Exposed to search engines(Google, Yahoo)



SharePoint (Current / Live Documents) OnBase (Historical Documents)

Electronic Documents Paper to Electronic image documents.

Paper Documents (supported by KnowledgeLake) PeopleSoft integration for lookup and retrieval

Photo Libraries Keyword indexing of documents for search and

retrieval (emplid, grant id).

Extensive collaboration abilities (Blogs, Wiki, Large Volume capture (50+ documents per day)

Discussion Boards)

Versioning , check in – check out process Automated capture and indexing of documents.

Content searchable (within documents) Access to very specific work groups which are

manually defined and maintained by IT staff.

No global student authentication.

Intelligent Workflow Intelligent Workflow for content management.

Security (ability to set your own security) Data retention / archiving



KnowledgeLake (SharePoint Integrated Solution) Desktop Scanners & Copiers

Paper to Electronic image documents for use in Can be integrated to capture paper documents for

SharePoint use with SharePoint / KnowledgeLake or Onbase

Large Volume capture (50+ documents per day)

Mass electronic document loading









2 Characteristics of Content:



2.1 Public Facing (Plone)

Public facing content is available to users on the World Wide Web. The content needs to be accessed by

anyone by the World Wide Web. This content could be used for promotion, education, research, and/or

student recruiting.



There are several things that need to be taken into consideration by making content available to users

via the World Wide Web.



o UofL Branding meets the necessary standards required to promote the University

o All electronic documents need to be made ADA compliant

o Video needs to have a transcript or captioning for ADA compliance

o Documents that are still being edited or revised should be linked through Plone to the

SharePoint environment



2.2 Current or Live Documents (SharePoint)

SharePoint was selected to be used for current or live documents because of its extensive collaboration

tools. Users can interact with one another to complete documents and share document ideas.



SharePoint was chosen to be our live document solution based on the following items.



o Electronic Documents providing communities for team

collaboration and making it easy for users to work together on documents, tasks, contacts,

events, and other information.

o SharePoint Secure internal documents, required login, collaboration, and user controlled access.

o SharePoint Public external documents, updated frequently, and linked from Plone to allow

global outside University viewing using supported Universities branding standards available

through Plone.



2.2.1 KnowledgeLake – Supporting Paper and Electronic Documents

KnowledgeLake was added to the mix to provide a solution for supporting paper and mass electronic use

within SharePoint.



KnowledgeLake brings the bellow features to support SharePoint.



o KnowledgeLake was added to our ECM tool set to allow users to scan documents into

SharePoint.

o Supporting SharePoint by providing a method to support document scanning and indexing

o Electronic Documents providing mass loading of inbound electronic documents for SharePoint

access

o Paper Documents scanning solution to support access in SharePoint

o Indexing content to make document easy to locate

o Searchable content and easy retrieval on demand



2.3 Historical Documents (OnBase)

OnBase was chosen to support historical documents because its ability to compress large amounts of

information.



B elow are the features OnBase performs to support historical documents.



o Paper Documents needed for record keeping and kept in

filing cabinets

o Electronic Documents stored in SharePoint, your hard drive, or I:drive that is no longer accessed

but needed for record retention.

o Searchable content and easy retrieval on demand.

o Workflow solutions for types of documents need to be filed together for easy retrieval.

o Paper Documents needed for record keeping and kept in

filing cabinets





3 Security



3.1 Confidential



To a certain extent all the content management tools can protect the content and present it to the

correct audience. If you would like to maintain your own security SharePoint is the best option for you.

Onbase requires an IT professional to setup security and also make any future security changes.



3.2 Permanent



All the content management tools participate in backup processes and disaster recovery preparation. If

content is deemed a permanent record the best tool may be determined by how the records are

searched.





4 Capture



4.1 Paper -> electronic file -> ECM tool

SharePoint with the use of KnowledgeLake or OnBase can be used for converting paper documents into

an electronic image when the volume is high or low.



4.2 Directory -> ECM tool

All the content management tools are capable of moving an electronic document from a local drive into

the content management tool. SharePoint with the use of KnowledgeLake or OnBase has the additional

capability to scrape a set of documents from a directory and place them as a group within either

document management system.



4.3 Forms based content capture

Plone or Java is capable of presenting a web form and gathering information. The main distinction is the

use of a database to store or retrieve information. Plone forms are easy to create and store information

in a standard file format. Plone can also email form submissions. Java is required if the data is to be

stored in a database or the form is to be pre-populated with data from a database. SharePoint and

OnBase also have form capability. Presently SharePoint not OnBase can be setup for public facing

access via the World Wide Web.



4.4 Automated / Manual Capture

SharePoint with the use of KnowledgeLake or OnBase is oriented towards large volumes of documents

gathered through repeatable processes and stored in a manner to facilitate search and retrieval.

Plone / Java have a similar dichotomy between manual and automated capture. Plone presents content

based on a manual derivation of paths and uploading of content. Java represents the custom

development capability of U of L which can through design automate processes.



4.5 Indexing



4.5.1 Automatic

SharePoint with the use of KnowledgeLake or OnBase are both capable of scraping a directory of files

and automatically indexing the group based on an index file in the same directory. Both provide a

keyword indexing capability that can read from a predefined section of a document and update an

index.



JAVA or .NET (C#) can be developed to accomplish similar levels of automation. This may be needed to

accommodate public facing content.



4.5.1.1 Whole text indexing

SharePoint with the use of KnowledgeLake or OnBase are both capable of whole text indexing. This is

where an index is created for every word of the content. Functionally this is similar to a search engine

on the World Wide Web.



Plone or Java uses this functionality for World Wide Web search engines such as Yahoo and Google.



4.5.1.2 Content off paper

Once paper is converted to an image document there are various technologies to extract content from

the image. Examples of these techniques include bar codes. Both SharePoint with the use of

KnowledgeLake and OnBase has the capability of indexing scanned documents based extracting an index

from the scanned image.



4.5.2 Manual

Manual indexing is another phrase for simply creating a directory path to a document or content. In a

web context the path is part of the URL. SharePoint and Plone the path is incorporated into menu items

and / or displayed as breadcrumbs.





5 Storage

All the content management tools store content in an environment designed to recover from backups

and to be restored in the event of a disaster. The relative capacities of Plone, Java development,

SharePoint and OnBase are similar. This means the size of the content is not a determining factor with

regards to the best content management tool for a particular kind of content.



5.1 Archiving

Archiving is a method of compressing content that should be retained but is not frequently accessed.

SharePoint or OnBase has allowed compression of content to be stored. We are currently evaluating

solutions for archiving SharePoint.

5.2 Versions

Version control is a way of measuring the change that occurs within content. Retention and archiving

have an implication of time versioning is focused on relative change. SharePoint has tools which assist

in the versioning of posted documents.





6 Workflow

When content passes through a series of decision or branching steps this is referred to as workflow.

SharePoint and OnBase offer features to support workflows which track and capture the events that

move the content to the next step. SharePoint uses the .NET (C#) programming language to provide

complex workflow solutions.





7 Integration

Integration is accomplished through COTS (Commercial Off the Shelf) tools that are designed to

integrate two different applications or custom development. The goal of integration is to leverage the

best of differing applications and more fundamentally keep content in one primary place. The

presentation of the content may be best done from a different application than the storage of the same

content.



This section was added to highlight the flow of content through capture, storage, and presentation. All

the Enterprise Content Management tools are capable of integration.



7.1 Data passed out from ECM system



7.1.1 PeopleSoft

SharePoint .NET (C#) workflow, OnBase, and Java custom applications have the capability to present

content based on index values derived within PeopleSoft.



7.2 Data passed into ECM system



7.2.1 Electronic Data Interchange style feed

Both SharePoint and OnBase have EDI capabilities to receive content from other applications in a

predefined format.



7.2.2 Bulk import of records

Both SharePoint with KnowledgeLake and OnBase has functionality to process sets of content with a file

defining the appropriate index.



7.3 Email

At this point the placing of Email into the content management tools is a manual process.



Other docs by linzhengnd
F_Rehab
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
affirmative asylum
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
er-oz_spor_malzemeleri__fiyatlar_a_dan_z_ye
Views: 19  |  Downloads: 0
Questions to homeworks 1 and 2
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
_FP7_partnerkeres__int_zm_nyek_honlapra
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
200811251358390.November 24_ 2008
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2nd Grade Summaries Theme 3
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!