Embed
Email

Source 2

Document Sample

Shared by: qingyunliuliu
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/27/2011
language:
English
pages:
2
Springfield Township High School

Graduation Project Annotated Bibliography



Student Name: Taylor Koroncai

Annotation # 2





MLA Citation:

“Update: Drunk Driving.” Issues & Controversies On File: n. pag. Issues & Controversies. Facts

On File News Services, 21 Sept. 2007. Web. 1 Mar. 2011. .



INFORMATION:

Author’s credentials:

There is no author stated for this article, but Facts on File is a reliable database.



Scope and purpose of the work:

This article is an informational report that gives two different sides to the issue of drunk driving.

The article provides an argument for and against certain laws, actions, and organizations involved

in ending the controversy of driving under the influence.





Intended Audience:

This article is intended for an average person. It is not difficult to understand. At times there is a

lot of information that is presented and it can be overwhelming, but other than that it’s pretty

simple to understand.





SUMMARY

Thesis or main idea:

The main idea of this article is to debate which method is the "proper approach" to deal with and

decrease the number of drunk drivers. Out of this main idea, the author discusses a variety of

plans, standards, and movements created by state authorities, the US Supreme Court, and

multiple organizations and also creates an essential question that becomes the thesis of this

piece: "Should the government employ some of the more aggressive means of preventing drunk

driving, such as operating security checkpoints? Or do such efforts go too far, infringing on

suspects' rights?"





Summary of main arguments:

The database begins the article with a basic overview of the issue (drunk driving). It discusses

how severe the problem is and the steps authorities are taken to crack down on the issue by

providing different facts on drunk driving. The article then gets into the controversy of the laws

that are enforced such as security checkpoints and the BAC. Two sides of this argument are then

presented to debate whether or not these laws are justifiable or unconstitutional. The article also

presents certain milestones in the fight against drunk driving including the creation of Mothers

Against Drunk Driving (MADD), an organization run by the federal government, and the case

Michigan vs. Sitz, which gave the government a loop hole in the Fourth Amendment that

administered authorities to run sobriety checkpoints. Finally, the article ends with an overview of

the critics point of view in the controversy and how they believe certain constitutional rights are

being violated and how "proponents have misrepresented the issue by using misleading figures.





EVIDENCE

Summary of evidence:

There are many pieces of evidence that support the two sided argument in this article.

References to the Fourth Amendment are present and a variety of statistics are exhibited

(example: "39% of all traffic-related deaths are related to alcohol.") Also, information about certain

organizations, Supreme Court cases and rulings, and an overview of the history behind drunk

driving can be found in the article.







EVALUATION

Evaluation of research:

The article provides many statistical facts that provide support for each argument. Therefore, the

article information is well researched. Because the article is organized in different sections, under

different titles, it is easy for the reader to follow along and pick up the main points clearly.





Evaluation of scope:

The topic has been well addressed. The entire article was purposeful and significant. All of the

information seemed there for a reason and everything was stated in the right way. There was a

lot of information to take in from this one article.



Evaluation of author bias:

There is no bias opinions by the author. The article presents an essential question as the thesis

and provides information to support each side of the argument.





REFLECTION:

I really enjoyed reading this article (even though it took me a while). It included a whole lot of

information about my topic. Most of it was very relevant, too. Even though some of it has been

repetitive of the previous articles I read, it helped to engrave the information in my mind. It

included a mixture of both general information and detailed information. There was a lot of

facts/statistics that I could take out of this article, as well as general knowledge that I should know

about my topic.



Related docs
Other docs by qingyunliuliu
CONTOURLP_ION
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Route_description_car
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
1598_0130
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
PreparingtotaketheGRE08
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
d4_english
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Slide 1 - tonywhiddon.org
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
cibinninger
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Steve Jobs
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!