Embed
Email

CPC Special Collections Subcommittee

Document Sample

Shared by: wanghonghx
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/26/2011
language:
English
pages:
4
CPC Special Collections Subcommittee

Conference Call

DRAFT Minutes

Tuesday, March 22, 2011



Present

FAU Vicky Thur

FIU Vicki Silvera

FSU Sammie Morris

UCF Laila Miletic-Vejzovic (Chair)

UF Rich Bennett

UNF Eileen Brady

USF Mark Greenberg



DISC Barbara Lewis (USF, representing Laurie Taylor, DISC Chair)



Absent

UWF Dean DeBolt



The meeting was held via teleconference at 10:00 a.m. EST.



Agenda:



Chair Laila Miletic-Vejzovic announced that the agenda of this call

would be the same as that scheduled for the cancelled conference call

in February.



1. Statewide Storage Facility Task Force Report – follow up



Laila noted that Cathy Martyniak, Chair of the Statewide Storage Task

Force, would not be joining the call, as this review was anticipated to

be a brief follow-up to the committee’s previous discussions on this

topic. General comments were made regarding the timeliness with which

the statewide storage facility may be built, possibly as late as 2015,

given the state’s lack of current PECO funding. Mark asked about the

potential statewide use of the UF building adjacent to the planned

storage facility site in Gainesville. Rich clarified that there are no

plans by UF to use this building as an interim statewide storage

facility. It is currently projected to house approximately one million

UF holdings (for future transfer to the statewide storage facility when

built), and there are also plans to move UF’s Digital Library Center

and preservation unit to this building.



Laila mentioned that Sammie had recently shared that FSU was not

opposed to putting special content materials in the statewide storage

facility. Several other members also gave the results of discussions

with their respective Deans on their potential use of the storage

facility for special collections materials:



 UCF (Laila) No projected use at this time, since UCF is planning

a new addition, i.e. an automated retrieval center (ARC) next to

their current library.

 UNF (Eileen) No projected use at this time, but UNF would

revisit the idea in five plus years.

 USF (Mark) USF might be interested in storing a limited amount

of materials, approximately 1000-3000 linear feet, and would

like to engage in future conversations about potential use.



Laila will send Cathy Martyniak a brief summary of this review for

inclusion in the Statewide Storage Task Force report.



2. Charge (any further discussion needed?)



Laila reported that the SCS quarterly report and charge were sent

on February 16 to Roy Ziegler, Chair of the Collection Planning

Committee (CPC). The CPC reviewed the documents, and stated they are

pleased with both the charge and the report. The SCS draft charge still

needs to be approved which will probably be addressed at the next CSUL

meeting.



3. Quarterly report to CPC (any further discussion needed?)



Combined with #2 above.





4. Feedback on CPC's 2011 Action Plan (any further discussion needed?)



Committee members were referred by Laila to the Collection Planning

Committee Action Plan for 2011, dated February 22, 2011. Discussion

followed regarding the singular inclusion of the SCS as a resource

under Core Objective 6.1: Identify grant and other funding sources for

digitization projects. This is a “carryover” objective from last year’s

plan; the 2011 Action Plan did not address the additional issues and

objectives listed in the SCS quarterly report (February 2011). Mark

raised the possibility of encouraging the CPC to advance a broader

special collections strategy and to integrate digital collections into

a larger assessment of the committee’s role in the future.



This discussion led to exploring specific ways to show the use of the

SUL digital collections and to identify common subject collections of

high research value held by the various libraries. Mark related the

committee’s initiative years ago which identified student newspapers as

a potential digitization item held by all the SUL Archives. For the

committee’s current purposes, he stressed the need for identifying

prime collecting areas of high research value and provided examples

held by USF: children’s or young adult literature, science fiction and

fantasy, Holocaust, genocide and crimes against humanity, and Florida’s

relationship to the Caribbean. Sammie concurred that three of these

subjects were also major collecting areas at FSU. Laila suggested the

popular and ubiquitous themes of Floridiana and tourism, which are two

of their primary collecting areas. The other areas include book arts,

African Americana, Caribbean and West Indies, and University Archives.



Mark also suggested the theme of Florida environmental sustainability

as a timely subject given the state’s major impact on the environment.

There was a general consensus that environmental materials are widely

held by each library, and might be an excellent choice for collective

additions to a statewide central digital collection such as PALMM

(Publication of Archival, Library and Museum Materials). Several

members noted that some of their digitized environmental materials were

already locally accessible through their SUL institutional

repositories. The group also discussed the possibility that several of

the environmental related PALMM collections (listed below) could be

combined and presented under a new, integrated PALMM umbrella.



 Big Cypress National Preserve Collection

 Everglades Digital Library

 Florida Environments Online

 Linking Florida’s National Heritage

 Reclaiming the Everglades

 Sanibel Island History

 Southwest Florida Environmental Documents

 General PALMM collections also hold environmental materials:

Aerial Photography, Archives Florida, Florida Heritage, Florida

Voices



Members provided examples of specific environmental holdings:

Everglades, faculty research and publications (Vicki Silvera, Rich);

faculty papers collection on the studies of wildlife (Vicki Thur);

Floridiana, ephemera, maps and photographs (Laila, Rich, Eileen); urban

/ rural land use, Tampa Bay water quality, Karst terrains, aquifers,

sinkholes and caverns (Mark); oceanography studies, Florida natural

resources (Sammie); St. Johns River, local land use, faculty

publications (Eileen).



5. Any Comments or Report from DISC – Barbara Lewis (for Laurie

Taylor)



Laila, in her capacity as Chair, reported that she participated in the

DISC conference call on March 9. At this call, she relayed the SCS

request that DISC explore and, if necessary, create technical

guidelines/standards for archiving born-digital materials (emails,

word, PDF, excel, websites). DISC members responded positively, but had

initial questions regarding the terminology and scope of the request,

and the current standards in use at the SULs. After a lively

discussion, DISC requested that the SCS assess and assign specific

priorities among the born-digital materials. Barbara mentioned that

audio and video standards were needed as well as those for website and

email archiving. Sammie agreed that website guidelines and preservation

metadata were a priority, and added the need for a general work flow

process for integrating the born-digital materials. Laila suggested

that members look at the University of Virginia Mellon funded AIMS

project, an inter-institutional model for stewardship of born-digital

collections, available at: http://www2.lib.virginia.edu/aims/



Final discussion on this topic focused on State Library records

management standards and guidelines, with Vicki Silvera reporting on

how FIU is implementing state standards in their University Archives.



6. Next Steps / Next Meeting Agenda



 Identification of primary collecting topics relating to Florida

environmental sustainability and land use. Members will identify

and report on three subject areas collected by their respective

library. Specifically explore and assess their environmental

holdings for future inclusion in an integrated PALMM digital

collection.

 Review of PALMM collections, and grant opportunities. Members will

review PALMM collections and explore grant opportunities to

develop a collective digital environmental project.

 Retrieval of PALMM statistics. Barbara will request PALMM

statistics from FCLA so the committee can assess the use of the

different collections.



 Explore DISC request to assess and assign SCS priorities among

born-digital materials.



7. Final Announcements



Laila reported that she will be attending the next DISC conference call

on April 13. She will also talk to Roy Ziegler about having a CPC

liaison appointed to the SCS. Sammie volunteered to attend the next CPC

conference call on April 12.



The next SCS conference call will be held on Tuesday, April 26, 2011 @

10 a.m. It will follow the regular schedule of meeting on the fourth

Tuesday of each month. Prior to the April meeting, Laila suggested that

members communicate with each other via email regarding agenda items.



The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 a.m. EST.



Minutes submitted by: Eileen Brady



Related docs
Other docs by wanghonghx
Foundation Grants 2009-2010
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
2Referat_ LMU_100205
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Beleggen
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
asw_may07_p27
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
comprehensive assessment planning
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ROMANIA- Rromania
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!