Contract Meeting by gT2dH4

VIEWS: 5 PAGES: 18

									  Contract Review



          Part No.:                                                                     Supplier:

      Drawing No.:                                                            Completion date:

             Issue:                                                Control Level Definition (CLD):

   Part Description:

Program / Platform:                                                                   Start date:



                       Participants:             Autoliv                                             Participants:            Supplier
                            o          Buyer                                                              o          Tool Engineer
                            o          Supplier Quality Engineer                                          o          Q.A. Representative

                            o          Design Engineer                                                    o          Project Manager
                            o          Program Manager


Purpose: The Contract Review process must be finalized prior to the P.O. being issued to the supplier. Through this review
process, we plan to review component design, raw material specification, tooling issues, critical/significant characteristics, PPAP,
quality and commercial issues. Preliminary program timing will be reviewed and key milestone dates will be agreed upon.

                     Autoliv to bring                                                                Supplier to bring
Current drawings and samples                                                     Tooling + Gauge list
                                                                                 Recommendation for Cost / Design Improvements
                                                                                 Mold or Tool Flow Analysis
                                                                                 Supplier Project Plan
                                                                                 Preliminary tool design
                                                                                 Process-Flow-Chart
                                                                                 Supplier APQP
                                                                                 Feasibility Study

After completing the following checklist, please sign your name and date below:

  SIGNATURES
  Name                                                 Company                                         Function                        Date
Contract Review

  General
  Issue                                                                        Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
1.0    General
1.1    Can supplier make recommendations on cost and design?                            
2.0    Project Milestones
2.1    Prototype delivery schedule?                                                     
2.2    Supplier Design Verification (DV)                                Date              
2.3    Tool order                                                       Date              
2.4    Serial contract                                                  Date              
2.5    Serial drawing                                                   Date              
2.6    First-Production-Trial-Run                                       Date              
2.7    PPAP-Production-Trial-Run                                        Date              
2.8    Supplier Product & Process Validation (PV)                       Date              
2.9    PPAP submission                                                  Date              
2.10   Run @ Rate                                                       Date              
2.11   Start of Production Autoliv                                      Date              
2.12   End of Production                                                Date              
2.13   Other milestones                                                 Date              
2.14   Supplier project time plan                                       Date              
2.15   Have all timing updates been introduced into the S-APQP?                         
3.0    PPAP Submission Agreement
3.1    Status PPAP Submission Agreement             Status OK                           
3.2    Agreed PPAP Level:                      (Default is Level 3)                       
4.0    Feasibility Study
       Was the Feasibility Study reviewed together with the supplier?
4.1                                                                                     
       Has supplier reviewed all specifications and drawing
4.2
       requirements?
                                                                                        
4.3    Was TFC (Team Feasibility Commitment) completed?                                 
  General
  Issue                                                                   Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
      Have all spec./drawings changes (if any) compared to the
4.4   original TFC (Team Feasibility Commitment) been reviewed                     
      and evaluated?
      Have all Feasibility-Study concerns been reviewed and closed?
4.5   (Ref.: Completion of "Specification and Drawing Concern                      
      Sheet" and "Follow-up Sheet")
4.6   Summary: Status Feasibility Study                OK?                         
5.0   Specifications
      Who has responsibility for the Drawing and the 3D model:
5.1
          YES=Autoliv, NO=Supplier
                                                                                   
5.2   3-D model format.                                                              
5.3   Specifications on drawing.                                                   
5.4   Is the specified material easily available on the market?                    
5.5   Other specifications:                                                          
6.0   Tooling / Equipment / Gauges
      List all unique tools, equipment and gauges required for the
6.1
      production of the listed part number (attach list to this review)
                                                                                     

6.2   Is tooling, equipment and plant capacity adequate?                           
      Has mistake proofing been incorporated into tooling/equipment
6.3
      ?
                                                                                   
6.4   Responsibility for tool design: (Please enter name)                            
6.5   Tool Source (Manufacturers name)                                               
6.6   Tool Ownership                                                                 
6.7   Tool completion leadtime                                                       
6.8   Will Autoliv require duplicate gauges for receiving inspection?              
6.9   Has Order/Capex been issued to support 6.8                                   
7.0   Quality Control
7.1   S-APQP started, timeplan established and agreed?                             
7.2   S-APQP report submission frequency/dates:                                      
      Requirements regarding identification, inspection and
7.3
      documentation of prototypes reviewed and agreed?
                                                                                   
      Launch/Interim Inspection Plan requirements
7.4   reviewed/defined? Ref.: AS412 (AS412-activities termination                  
      only with Autoliv SQA approval)
7.5   Has the supplier had problems with a similar part?                           
  General
  Issue                                                                     Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
        Has Supplier reviewed Autoliv information about problems with
7.6
        same / similar part?
                                                                                     
        Are corrective actions to 7.5 and 7.6 in place and verified to be
7.7
        efficient?
                                                                                     
        Enhanced traceability requirements (beyond normal lot
7.8
        traceability e.g. Barcoding, level 1 AS4)
                                                                                     
7.9     Other                                                                        
8.0     Handling / Packaging / Logistics
8.1     Packaging instructions                                                       
8.2     Marking and label according to AS 244                                        
8.3     Supplier production location:                                                  
8.4     Autoliv production location:                                                   
8.5     Other                                                                        
9.0     Environment
        Substances used in product or process stated asrestricted or
9.1
        forbidden in AS5 / IMDS
                                                                                     
9.2     Does the supplier have knowledge and access to IMDS?                         
9.3     Other                                                                        
10.0 Agreement
10.1    Frame agreement.                                                             
10.2    Request for quotation (RFQ) and quotation reference:                           
10.3    Part price (Currency).                                                         
10.4    Terms of payment.                                                              
10.5    Terms of delivery.                                                             
10.6    Packaging included in part price?                                            
10.7    Tool price (Currency).                                                         
10.8    Terms of payment for tool (Currency).                                          
10.9    Capacity Planning volume (Estimate only)                                       
10.10   Autoliv peak daily volume (Estimate only)                                      
10.11   Maximum tool capacity.                                                         
10.12   Maximum Machine Capacity "work/shift pattern":                                 
10.13   Is the continuos replacement of tools per tool life assured ?                
10.14   Cost reduction proposals / plan?                                             
10.15   Spare / Service part requirements agreed?                                    
  General
  Issue                               Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
11.0 Miscellanious
11.1   Any other supplier concerns?            
11.2   Any other open issues?                  
Contract Review

 Appendix: Metal / Stampted Part
Issue                                        Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
1.0     Tool
1.1     Prototype tool                                
1.2     Low series (low volume)                       
1.3     Series tool (production tool)                 
1.4     Type of tool.                                   
1.5     Number of stations.                             
1.6     Layout.                                         
1.7     Material in tool.                               
1.9     Tool plate Number.                              
1.10    Press force / Machine size / Type.              
1.11    Theoretical cycle time.                         
1.12    Other:                                          
2.0     Article
2.1     Material.                                       
2.2     Material supplier.                              
2.3     Material OEM approved.                        
2.4     Material original mill source.                  
2.5     Material width.                                 
2.6     Scrap (%).                                      
2.7     Wane / Burr edge and size.                    
2.8     Shear surface.                                
2.9     Contemporary shear.                           
2.10    Grain direction.                              
Appendix: Metal / Stampted Part
Issue                                                   Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
2.11    Deburring.                                                
2.12    Edge condition.                                           
2.13    Coining.                                                  
2.14    Heat treatment.                                           
2.15    Heat treatment source approved by Autoliv.                
2.16    Deformation.                                              
2.17    Surface treatment.                                        
2.18    Surface treatment source approved by Autoliv.             
2.19    Hang marks.                                               
2.20    Degree of purity.                                           
2.21    Cut outs.                                                 
2.22    Other.                                                    
3.0     Marking /Traceability
3.1     Position of marking.                                       
3.2     Type of marking.                                           
3.3     Marking frequency.                                         
Contract Review

 Appendix: Die Cast Part
Issue                                       Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
1.0     Tool
1.1     Prototype tool                               
1.2     Low series (low volumes)                     
1.3     Series tool (production tool)                
1.4     Type of tool.                                  
1.5     Number of cavities.                            
1.6     Tool plate No.                                 
1.7     Tool surface treatment                         
1.9     Press force / Machine size / Type              
1.10    Theroetical cycle time                         
1.11    Other                                          
2.0     Article
2.1     Material.                                      
2.2     Reused material.                             
2.3     Material supplier.                             
2.4     Flash, burr.                                   
2.5     Parting line.                                  
2.6     Confluent line.                                
2.7     Mould gate position.                           
2.8     Ejector pin position.                          
2.9     Contraction.                                   
2.10    Surface pattern.                               
3.0     Marking / Traceability
Appendix: Die Cast Part
Issue                          Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
3.1     Position of marking.              
3.2     Type of marking.                  
3.3     Marking frequency.                
Contract Review

 Appendix: Plastic Part
Issue                                              Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
1.0     Tool
1.1     Prototype tool.                                     
1.2     Low series.                                         
1.3     Series tool.                                        
1.4     Type of tool.                                         
1.5     Number of cavities.                                   
1.6     Theoretical cycle time.                               
1.7     Tool plate number.                                    
1.8     Press force / Machine size / Type.                    
1.9     Gate and Ejector location.                            
1.10    Metal insert grain direction definition.              
1.11    Mould surface specification.                          
2.0     Article
2.1     Material.                                             
2.2     Material OEM approved?                              
2.3     Reused / Regrind material (%).                        
2.4     Flash, burr.                                          
2.5     Parting line.                                         
2.6     Confluent line.                                       
2.7     Gate and Ejector location.                            
2.8     Surface pattern.                                      
2.9     Handling.                                             
2.10    Colour Standard (Master).                           
Appendix: Plastic Part
Issue                                                Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
2.11    Has colour samples been given to supplier?            
3.0     Marking / Traceability
3.1     Position of marking.                                    
3.2     Type of marking.                                        
3.3     Marking frequency.                                      
Contract Review

 Appendix: Cable Harness
Issue                               Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
1.0 Tool
1.1     Process flow description.            
1.2     Automatic assembly.                  
1.3     Manually assembly.                   
1.4     Special processes.                   
1.5     Theoretical cycle time.                
2.0 Article
2.1     Material OEM approved.                 
2.2     Components OEM approved.               
3.0 Marking / Traceability
3.1     Position of marking:                   
3.2     Type of marking:                       
3.3     Marking frequency:                     
Contract Review

 Appendix: Assembly
Issue                               Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
1.0     Tool
1.1     Process flow description.            
1.2     Automatic assembly.                  
1.3     Manually assembly.                   
1.4     Special processes.                   
1.5     Theoretical cycle time.                
1.6     Sub-contractor.                      
2.0     Marking / Traceability
2.1     Position of marking:                   
2.2     Type of marking:                       
2.3     Marking frequency:                     
Contract Review

 Appendix: Textile
Issue                                                Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
1.0 Tool
        Weaving
1.1     Type of fabric.                                         
1.2     Type of yarn.                                           
1.3     Width and length of fabric.                             
        Coating
1.4     Type of coating.                                        
1.5     Weight.                                                 
        Cutting
1.6     Principle cutting.                                      
1.7     Secondary cutting.                                      
1.8     Cutting Scrap.                                          
1.9     Cutting of Vent holes.                                  
        Sewing
1.10    Type of machine.                                        
1.11    Needle size.                                            
2.0 Article
2.1     Material OEM approved.                            
2.2     Specification clear and appropriate               
2.3     Master colour master (webbing only).              
2.4     Has colour samples been given to supplier?        
3.0 Marking / Traceability
3.1     Position of marking.                                    
Appendix: Textile
Issue                        Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
3.2     Type of marking.                
3.3     Marking frequency.              
Contract Review

 Appendix: Inflator
Issue                                           Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
1.0 Approvals
1.1     BAM No. and transport classification:              
1.2     DOT, classification of explosives:                 
1.3     INERIS (France):                                   
1.4     SAI (Sweden):                                      
1.5     Pressure vessel approval                         
2.0 Marking / Traceability
2.1     Position of marking:                               
2.2     Type of marking:                                   
2.3     Marking frequency:                                 
Contract Review

 Appendix: Covers
Issue                                                                         Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
1.0     Tool
1.1     Is there a designated graining source ?                                        
1.2     Is plating required for this mold ?                                            
1.3     Who will be the plating source ?                                               
1.4     Has a mold flow analysis been completed ?                                      
1.5
        Has hook & window attachment been used? If not, has cover                      
        distortion been evaluated ?
1.6
        Have groove & block designs been evaluated for no distortion                   
        at tool removal ?
1.7
        Do groove & block designs contain flexibility such as wall                     
        breaks ?
1.8
        Is part flexing (for removal from tool) at locations other than the            
        hidden tear seam ?
1.9
        Is any special test equipment necessary ? Who will be                          
        responsible for funding ?
1.10    Has the supplier defined gate and ejector location ?                           
1.11    Is grain direction defined within mold (metal) ?                               
1.12
        Is the mold surface finish specification appropriate for the                   
        desired part features and characteristics ?
1.13    Is the mold acceptable to run "no paint" material ?                            
2.0     Article / Drawing issues
2.1     Is the datum scheme defined ?                                                  
2.2
        Does the datum scheme reflect the application of the                           
        component ?
2.3
        Does the datum scheme reflect the manufacturing process                        
        (tooling, fixtures, etc.) ?
2.4
        Is the G.D. & T. understood, manufacturable and measureable                    
        ?
Appendix: Covers
Issue                                                                       Yes   No   N/A Action Item / Comment   Responsibility   Due Date
2.5     Is the area to be painted defined on the drawing ?                           
2.6
        Is the correct style polishing called out for high stick areas on            
        the part ?
2.7     Are draft angles correct in potential high stick areas ?                     
2.8     Material.                                                                      
2.9     Material OEM approved?                                                       
2.10    Reused / Regrind material (%).                                                 
2.11    Flash, burr.                                                                   
2.12    Parting line.                                                                  
2.13    Confluent line.                                                                
2.14    Gate and Ejector location.                                                     
2.15    Surface pattern.                                                               
2.16    Handling.                                                                      
2.17    Colour Standard (Master).                                                    
2.18    Has colour samples been given to supplier?                                   

								
To top