Report for:
Action and Consultation
Item Number:
Contains Confidential NO
or Exempt Information
Title School Funding 2011-12
Responsible Officer(s) Gary Redhead, Assistant Director Schools Planning &
Resources, gary.redhead@ealing.gov.uk 0208 825 5773
Author(s) Dawn Calvert, Head of Finance, Children‟s Services,
clavertd@ealing.gov.uk 0208 825 9034 and Gary Redhead,
Assistant Director Schools Planning & Resources,
gary.redhead@ealing.gov.uk 0208 825 5773
Portfolio(s) Councillor Dr Patricia Walker, Children‟s Services
For Consideration By Schools Forum
Date to be Considered 9th February 2011
Implementation Date if Not Applicable
Not Called In
Affected Wards All
Keywords/Index School Funding, School Finance Regulations
Purpose of Report:
To consult the Schools Forum on the School Funding arrangements for 2011-12 and to
seek approval for an increase in the Central Expenditure Limit.
1. Recommendations
It is recommended that the Schools Forum:
i. Agrees to exclude from the Minimum Funding Guarantee (MFG) the following
amounts:
Table 1
Devolved
Primary National
£575,745
Strategy (targeted)
Secondary National
£269,223
Strategy (targeted)
Diploma Formula £26,336
Total £871,304
ii. Agrees to amend the operation of the MFG by excluding the January 2010 pupil
numbers and 2010-11 financial year allocations for age weighted pupil
allocations for nursery aged pupils in primary schools and the formula
allocations for nursery schools;
iii. Agrees to seek the Secretary of State‟s approval to exclude from the MFG
resources devolved to Northolt High School for the former Northolt Education
Action Zone, totalling £283,306;
iv. Agrees to seek the Secretary of State‟s approval to exclude from the MFG
resources delegated in 2010-11 for BSF support and Police in Schools, both of
which have ceased, at the following schools:
Table 2
BSF
Senior Police in
School Total
Staff Schools
Release
Acton High £5,000 £20,000 £25,000
Brentside High £5,000 £20,000 £25,000
The Cardinal Wiseman Catholic
£0 £20,000 £20,000
High
Dormers Wells High £0 £20,000 £20,000
Drayton Manor High £50,000 £20,000 £70,000
The Ellen Wilkinson School for
£50,000 £20,000 £70,000
Girls
Elthorne Park High £50,000 £20,000 £70,000
Featherstone High £50,000 £20,000 £70,000
Greenford High £5,000 £20,000 £25,000
Northolt High £50,000 £20,000 £70,000
Twyford High £50,000 £20,000 £70,000
Villiers High £50,000 £20,000 £70,000
Belvue School £20,000 £0 £20,000
John Chilton School £5,000 £0 £5,000
St Ann's School £20,000 £0 £20,000
Springhallow School £20,000 £0 £20,000
Total £430,000 £240,000 £670,000
Notes
The government ended the BSF programme, there are now only the two sample
schools left in the programme. The funding was to support release of senior staff to
develop proposals for each school. Following the ending of the three year
contributions from the Authority towards funding officers in schools, the MET Police
intend to fund Police Officers attached to schools
v. Notes the growth pressures on the Individual Schools Budget (ISB) estimated to
be £2,375,100 that will be funded from within the resources delegated to schools
and agrees to increase the Central Expenditure Limit (CEL) in respect of the
growth pressures of a total of £1,012,000,that fall within the retained part of the
Schools Budget
Table 3 (Table 8 in the report)
Delegated Retained
Pressure Total Comment
Budget Budget
Primary Places: 17 Previous bid
additional FE, at based on
£300,000 £720,000 £1,020,000
£60,000 per FE, high
September to March projection
SEN Demand: No Change
Additional 32 Places at £576,500 £576,500
ARPs
SEN Demand: 18 No Change
Places at Special £452,100 £452,100
schools
Special School Costs Full bid.
per place £721,500 £721,500 Could be
phased
In-Year Admissions: Reduced by
above number Years £170,000 £170,000 £330,000
1, 2 and 10
Speech and Language New
Provision in Early Pressure
£75,000 £122,000 £197,000
Years Settings and identified
ICAN Nurseries
Khalsa School, No Change
£250,000 £250,000
Building up numbers
TOTAL £2,375,100 £1,012,000 £3,387,100
vi. Agrees that the funds for each item in iii to vii above may be moved between the
Individual Schools Budget (ISB) and the retained part of the School Budget
(including increasing the Schools Contingency) following further consultation
with individual schools affected and that the Central Expenditure Limit be
adjusted up or down accordingly;
vii. Advises the Authority on the level of the MFG that should be set for the financial
year 2011-12;
viii. Agrees to increase the Central Expenditure Limit (CEL) to enable the retention
of part of the grants mainstreamed into the Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) for
all or some of the following services:
Table 4 (Table 10 in the report)
£ per DSG
funded
Areas £ pupil
EOTAS currently Devolved
£189,300 £5
Grants
Managed Moves £150,000 £4
SAFE Adolescence Service £467,000 £11
School Sports Partnership:
£96,000 £2
Matched funding
£ per DSG
funded
Areas £ pupil
Diploma Formula Grant:
Funding 2011-12 commitments
£66,800 £2
to diploma learners (one year
only)
School Improvement and School Partnerships
Strand 1. Supporting,
£465,000 £11
Achievement and Curriculum
Strand 2. Supporting e-learning -
£278,000 £7
CLC offer
Strand 3. Supporting Leadership
£215,000 £5
and Professional Development
Strand 4 Supporting Inclusion £493,000 £12
Strand 5 Supporting Integrated
£450,000 £11
working
Total £2,870,100 £69
ix. Subject to any national changes in School Funding, agrees that any increase in
the CEL in respect of Strands 1 to 5 above are for 2011-12 and 2012-13
financial years only and the Diploma Formula Grant for 2011-12 financial year
only;
x. Subject to decisions made in respect of Strand 5 above, agrees to seek the
Secretary of State‟s approval to exclude from the MFG resources devolved to
Featherstone and Greenford High Schools to employ extended schools co-
ordinators for their respective area partnerships and the Parental Support
Advisors in primary schools
Table 5
Devolved
Extended Schools: Southall South £59,292
Extended Schools: Greenford £59,292
Parent Support Advisors £180,000
Total £298,584
xi.
xii. Notes the introduction of the pupil premium;
xiii. Advises the Authority on the re-allocation of the flat rate allocations to high
schools for BSF support and Police in Schools;
xiv. Advises the Authority on how the devolved parts of the following grants should
be integrated into the Schools‟ Funding Formula:
Table 6 (Table 10 in the report)
Proposed Formula: Current Devolved
Grants
Amount Only less any agreed exclusions
Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
School Stds Grant
received in 2010-11
Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
School Stds Grant (P)
received in 2010-11
School Development Grant Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
Total received in 2010-11, less Northolt EAZ
School Lunch Grant Add to Free School Meals Factor
Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
Ethnic Minority Achievement
received in 2010-11
Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
1 2 1 Tuition
received in 2010-11
Extended Schools
Subject to Secretary of State‟s decision
Sustainability
Extended Schools Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
Disadvantage Subsidy received in 2010-11
Primary National Strategy Low Prior Attainment
Secondary National Strategy Low Prior Attainment
Diploma Formula Subject to Schools Forum Decision
xv. Advise the Authority on whether the Forum supports paying the Carbon
Commitment from the retained part of the DSG rather than schools meeting the
costs from their own budget shares and, if required, agrees an increase in the
Central Expenditure Limit to fund the sum required
2. Reason for Decision and Options Considered
The Council is required to consult the Schools Forum on changes to the formula used for
determining individual school budget shares. Approval of the Forum is required to
increase the amount deducted in relation to central expenditure and to vary limits in
relation to deductions for specific items of expenditure including the school‟s specific
contingency.
3. Key Implications
This report covers the outcome of the Comprehensive Spending Review including the
implications of simplifying the number of grant funding streams; the introduction of the
pupil premium and other national changes to the Regulations; and known pressure and
priorities that need to be considered as part of the school funding.
SECTION A: CHILDREN’S SERVICES FUNDING
The overall funding settlement for Children‟s Services overall is not as generous as the
School‟s settlement (except 6th Forms), reflecting the priority given schools and the health
service. The main points in the settlement are:
Formula Grant
Two Year settlement for Council 12.3% grant reduction in 2011-12 and 8.4% in
2012-13, further reductions in year 3 and 4
Over four year period Council‟s formula grant likely to reduce by 28%
Reductions amount to £13m over 3 year period
5 Area Based Grants merged into formula grant (£2.3m) and subject to 25.3%
reduction over three years
Other Grants
ABGs: 15 grants ceased (£1.1m) including school improvement service grants
Specific Grants to Children’s Services: (£24.7m) reduction of £1.4m decision
pending on £991,000 of grants
Standards Funds: Aim Higher (£42,000), Harnessing Technology Grant (HTG)
(£117,000 retained) and CLC Capital (£210K) ceased
School devolved HTG ceased
New Early Intervention Grant (EIG): created from former ABG and other grants.
£15.4m for 2011-12, a £1.7m reduction
Officers are currently working on proposals to implement the reduction in funding and
reconfigure services as required.
SECTION B: SETTLEMENT FOR SCHOOLS
In this section we set out the main elements of the settlement for schools; set out some
issues relating to school baseline budgets and the MFG and identify a range of options for
funding known pressures which we reported in our report to the Schools Forum in October
2010.
Overall Settlement
The government announced a one-year settlement for schools in December. The key
aspects are:
A cash flat Schools Budget except for 6th Form funding;
The introduction of a pupil premium of £430 allocated on the basis of known
entitlement to free school meals for pupils from Reception to Year 11;
Mainstreaming a large number of grants into the Dedicated Schools Grant, in the
case of Ealing this amounts to £36.8m of which £30.8m was devolved to schools in
2010-11;
Setting the Minimum Funding Guarantee (MFG) at –1.5% though the DfE envisage
that Authorities should be able to agree a higher level.
Details of the grants that have been mainstreamed are shown in Table 7 below. The table
shows the total grant, the amount devolved to schools, allocated to the Education
Otherwise than at School Service (The study Centres) and the amount retained. The
retained amount is used to fund staff and programmes that mainly are in school
improvement, school partnerships and the secondary behaviour and SAFE Adolescence
Services.
Table 7: Grants that have been mainstreamed into the Dedicated Schools Grant
(DSG)
Mainstreamed Grants baseline
Total Devolved EOTAS Retained
School Stds Grant £6,710,739 £6,657,230 £53,509 £0
School Stds Grant (P) £2,871,878 £2,868,260 £3,618 £0
School Development Grant
£15,272,078 £12,848,090 £88,355 £2,335,633
Total
School Lunch Grant £488,161 £486,531 £1,630 £0
Ethnic Minority Achievement £4,620,846 £4,274,533 £17,730 £328,583
1 2 1 Tuition £1,641,338 £1,527,705 £5,078 £108,555
Extended Schools £1,067,013 £298,584 £0 £768,429
Sustainability
Mainstreamed Grants baseline
Total Devolved EOTAS Retained
Extended Schools £1,017,735 £788,952 £6,557 £222,226
Disadvantage Subsidy
Primary National Strategy £1,248,991 £689,495 £0 £559,496
Secondary National Strategy £377,234 £314,391 £12,823 £50,020
Diploma Formula £66,848 £26,336 £0 £40,512
Exceptional Circumstances £281,000 £0 £0 £281,000
Grant
London Pay Award Grant £1,133,000 £0 £0 £1,133,000
Total Grant Mainstreamed £36,796,861 £30,780,107 £189,300 £5,827,454
Baseline Budgets
Appendix 2 provides details on school baseline budgets for 2011-12. Essentially, all
devolved grants for each school will be added to each school‟s 2011-12 School Budget
Share (ie. a school‟s formula allocation) except where the Schools Forum or the Secretary
of State approve variations.
DfE have issued guidance on this matter. At the time of writing this report, the School
Finance Regulations had not been finalised, but it is expected that the Regulations will
provide for:
Where grants have been devolved to schools the funding should be included in the
baseline budget for the purposes of the MFG
The Schools Forum can agree adjustments in the operation of the MFG where:
o The proposed variation applies to the implementation of the early years
single funding formula in isolation. It would therefore have to apply only to
schools with early years provision and not seek to exclude mainstreamed
grants from the MFG coverage
o The proposed variation would result in a higher level of MFG than -1.5% (for
example, -1% per pupil)
o The proposed variation relates only to the Diploma formula grant, which has
been paid to schools based on actual numbers taking Diplomas, and/or the
targeted elements of primary and secondary National Strategies grant, which
were given to schools explicitly on a one-year basis.
Other exceptions have to be agreed by the Secretary of State
Possible exceptions we need to consider are:
Extended Schools Sustainability
Most of this grant was retained and funded the programme and the area co-ordinators.
Featherstone and Greenford High employed the co-ordinators for schools in their area and
the funding was devolved to the two schools concerned. In addition, a number of schools
received time limited funding for Parent Support Advisers. If these amounts are included
in schools‟ base lines then the funding would permanently become part of their school
budgets.
School Development Grant: Northolt Education Action Zone
Approximately £283,000 for the partnership was “banked” by Northolt High School. It is
proposed that an application is made to the Secretary of State so that funding is not
included in the school‟s baseline budget or in the schools in the partnership
The integration of the former grants into the Schools funding formula is considered later in
this report.
Funding Known Pressures and Priorities
In our report to the Forum we identified funding pressures of £4.3m. In a cash flat budget,
there is no growth in the unit of funding, which may be used meet pressures. In these
circumstances, there are a number of approaches to funding cost pressures:
Review and reduce the funding required and seek to contain them within existing
resources
Re-allocate funding from specific grants that was previously retained centrally
Set a low MFG to create headroom
Review of pressures
Since October we have reviewed the known pressures and reduced the pressure by
£0.9m. A revised list is set out below. We have shown a split between pressures that fall
within the Individual schools Budget (ISB) which are delegated to schools and those that
will be part of the retained Schools Budget and devolved to schools as appropriate during
the year.
Table 8: Known Funding Pressures
Delegated Retained
Pressure Total Comment
Budget Budget
Previous bid
Primary Places: 17 additional
based on
FE, at £60,000 per FE, £300,000 £720,000 £1,020,000
high
September to March
projection
SEN Demand: Additional 32
£576,500 £576,500 No Change
Places at ARPs
SEN Demand: 18 Places at
£452,100 £452,100 No Change
Special schools
Full bid
Special School Costs per place £721,500 £721,500 could be
phased
In-Year Admissions: above Reduced by
£170,000 £170,000
number Years 1, 2 and 10 £330,000
Speech and Language Provision New
in Early Years Settings and £75,000 £122,000 £197,000 Pressure
ICAN Nurseries identified
Khalsa School, Building up
£250,000 £250,000 No Change
numbers
TOTAL £2,375,100 £1,012,000 £3,387,100
All of the pressures relate to in-year growth in pupil numbers apart from Special School
costs where the proposal is to equalise the place factors for Castlebar and Belvue and
Mandeville and St Ann‟s and the speech and language provision. We are seeking to fund
children with more complex needs placed at Springhallow School from the Individual
Support Budget. We have scaled back the costs of the primary expansion programme
basing it on the mid projection rather than the highest. With regard to the ARPs, these
costs are based on the agreed staffing levels in the new units. On in-year admissions, we
currently fund in-year admissions through the Fair Access Protocol on the basis of the age
weighted pupil unit plus 15 percent add-on. There is already £80,000 in the retained
budget for Year 10 places and together with the £170,000 proposed we would have
funding for an additional 58 FTE places in 2011-12. In summary the risk for pupil growth
above the estimates shown in the Table above, would need to be managed within the
retained budget.
With regard to the Special School cost per place, one of the main arguments for equalising
funding is that children with more complex needs have been admitted to the primary phase
in recent years and these are now entering the secondary phase. The amount of
£721,500 would equalise the funding in one year. It would be possible to phase the
adjustment in funding over a two to three year period but in future years these would
require part of the costs to be met from a negative minimum funding guarantee.
Re-allocate Funding from the retained part of mainstreamed grants
As table 7 above sets out, there is £5.8m that was retained from grants that are being
mainstreamed. This provides a possible source of funding for pressures but would require
some reduction in services that depend on this funding, principally in school improvement
and school partnerships. Within the retained items there is £1.4m of retained grants that
have been unallocated, the exceptional circumstances and London Pay Award grants
which are currently unallocated.
Setting a negative MFG
The government has set the MFG at –1.5% but considers that there may be scope for a
higher MFG to be set. The table below shows the potential impact on schools on average
of setting a higher MFG. A higher MFG reduces the headroom to fund other pressures.
Setting a 0% MFG would require growth pressure to be met in full from the retained parts
of the grants that are being mainstreamed. Our recommendation would be to set the MFG
as close as possible to 0% provided the Finance Regulations do not require the delegation
of some or all of the currently retained Standards Fund Grants. If this was required,
pressures would need to be funded through a larger negative MFG.
Table 9: Illustration of Impact on schools of minus MFG
(Jan 2010 Data) -0.5% -1.0% -1.5%
Baseline MFG £208,977,817 £208,977,817 £208,977,817
Reduced Baseline MFG £207,932,928 £206,888,039 £205,843,150
Reduction £1,044,889 £2,089,778 £3,134,667
Impact on Schools
Average Primary £8,754 £17,507 £26,261
£32,911 £65,823 £98,734
Average Secondary
Average Special £11,805 £23,610 £35,415
Average Nursery £2,476 £4,953 £7,429
In summary, other things being equal, we have identified known pressures of £3.4m that
need to be funded from within the DSG. Unless further reductions can be identified, these
pressures need to be funded either from the retained part of the grants that are being
mainstreamed or through a negative MFG.
SECTION C: POSSIBLE INCREASES IN THE RETAINED BUDGET FOR GRANTS
MAINSTREAMED INTO THE DSG
As described above, a significant amount of activity undertaken by the Authority for
schools and children and young people was funded by Area Based Grants (ABGs) or
various Standards Funds that have been mainstreamed into the DSG. The new funding
rules requires the approval of the Schools Forum to increase the Central Expenditure Limit
should the Forum decide it wanted to fund these activities centrally. The other options are
that activity is ceased or schools buy-back services as they do at the moment.
The table below summarises the areas we wish the Forum to consider and further
information is included in appendix 1. The Forum needs to consider each area separately
and may:
Reject the proposal in full on the basis that the activity should cease or be subject to
a buy back arrangements
Approve the proposal in full, or
Approve the proposal in part.
For the avoidance of doubt, the Forum is not being asked to approve the detailed revised
staffing structures or how the services operate in the future. These aspects would be
subject to further consultation. The intention is that the information provided in Appendix
1 provides the Forum with clear information on the type of service that could be provided.
Table 10: Service Area Proposals funded by an increase in the CEL
£ per DSG funded
Areas £
pupil
EOTAS currently Devolved Grants £189,300 £5
Managed Moves £150,000 £4
Behaviour Service & SAFE
£467,000 £11
Adolescence Service
School Sports Partnership: Matched
£96,000 £2
funding
Diploma Formula Grant: Funding
2011-12 commitments (one year £66,800 £2
only)
School Improvement and School Partnerships
Strand 1. Supporting, Achievement
£465,000 £11
and Curriculum
Strand 2. Supporting e-learning -
£278,000 £7
CLC offer
Strand 3. Supporting Leadership and
£215,000 £5
Professional Development
Strand 4 Supporting Inclusion £493,000 £12
Strand 5 Supporting Integrated
£450,000 £11
working
Total £2,870,100 £69
Before making decisions on these matters, the Forum is referred to the summary in
Section D below.
SECTION D: SUMMARY OF PRESSURES AND POSSIBLE INCREASES IN THE CEL
Taken together the pressures and possible increases would require the application of the
whole of the currently retained grants and also a small negative MFG. Table 11 provides
the information:
Table 11: Funding Pressures and an increase in the CEL
£ per DSG
Areas £ funded
Pupil
Pressures and Priorities
Pressures £3,387,100 £82
Potential increases in CEL for
£2,870,100 £69
Grants
Total £6,257,200 £151
Potential Sources of Funding
Current Related Grants £5,827,400 £141
Devolved EOTAS Grants £189,300 £5
Devolved Diploma Formula Grant £26,300 £1
Negative MFG of -0.1% £214,200 £5
Total £6,257,200 £151
Notes
*Rounding error of £1 in total
The potential sources of funding may be adjusted depending on the Financing School
Regulations.
SECTION E: PUPIL PREMIUM
As part of the settlement for schools, the government announced the introduction of a pupil
premium. The main aspects of the premium are that funding will be allocated to:
Pupils in Reception to Year 11 who are known to be entitled to free schools meals
at a rate of £430 per pupil
Service children identified on a school roll in the same Year groups receive £200
Looked After Children are covered and £430 will be allocated to the responsible
local authority
Further changes are expected in future years, for example, including children in the count
who have been entitled to free school meals in the past. The government has stated that
over time the pupil premium would be the main method of allocating deprivation funding to
schools.
Based on January 2010 data it is estimated that Ealing schools would receive over £4.0m.
An indicative allocation for the pupil premium for each school is included in appendix 2.
SECTION F: CHANGES TO THE SCHOOLS FUNDING FORMULA
Mainstreaming Grants
The table below shows the total, including retained funding, for mainstreamed grants and
the basis on which the devolved part was allocated in 2010-11.
Table 12: Formula for Mainstreamed Grants
Grants Total Formula
School Stds Grant £6,710,739 Flat rate and amount per pupil
Amount per pupil, FSM and Low Prior
School Stds Grant (P) £2,871,878
Attainment
School Development Grant Many original sub-formulae and targeted
£15,272,078
Total allocations
School Lunch Grant £488,161 70% pupil Nos and 30% FSM.
Ethnic Minority Achievement £4,620,846 Complex local formulae
1 2 1 Tuition £1,641,338 Low Prior Attainment
Extended Schools
£1,067,013 No formula
Sustainability
Extended Schools
£1,017,735 Entitlement to Free School Meals
Disadvantage Subsidy
Primary National Strategy £1,248,991 Lump sum. For part mostly no formula
Secondary National Strategy £377,234 Low prior attainment
Diploma Formula £66,848 Diploma learners
Exceptional Circumstances
£281,000 No formula
Grant
London Pay Award Grant £1,133,000 Not allocated
Total Grant Mainstreamed £36,796,861
The DfE have proposed to mainstream a number of specific grants. Regulations will be
amended to allow local authorities to include in their formula factors that allow the grants to
be allocated the basis of an amount or cash basis that schools receive currently.
This method is relatively straightforward and avoids turbulence but does mean that this
would effectively firm up previous allocations to schools when the basis for the allocations
may no longer be relevant. In addition, there is possibly a case for reviewing some of the
allocations in the light of the introduction of the pupil premium over time.
What is proposed is a mix of both approaches. It is proposed to allocate through
appropriate formula factors for grants that will be excluded from the MFG and all other
grants at the same cash level for the grants that were devolved to schools. This will
support a greater level of transparency as the grants are transferred and provide time for
discussions with schools in the coming year on possible changes to the school funding
formula and any national changes that may be made as the current settlement is for one
year. Table 13 overleaf shows these proposals for each grant in detail:
Table 13: Integrating Grants into the Schools Funding Formula
Proposed Formula: Current Devolved
Grants Amount Only less any agreed exclusions
Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
School Stds Grant
received in 2010-11
Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
School Stds Grant (P)
received in 2010-11
School Development Grant Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
Total received in 2010-11, less Northolt EAZ
School Lunch Grant Add to Free School Meals Factor
Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
Ethnic Minority Achievement
received in 2010-11
Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
1 2 1 Tuition
received in 2010-11
Extended Schools
Subject to Secretary of State‟s decision
Sustainability
Extended Schools Allocate as fixed cash allocation a school
Disadvantage Subsidy received in 2010-11
Primary National Strategy Low Prior Attainment
Secondary National Strategy Low Prior Attainment
Diploma Formula Subject to Schools Forum Decision
SECTION G: BASELINE BUDGETS FOR SCHOOLS
Appendix 2 shows the proposed baseline budget for all schools. These have been created
on the basis of the recommendations in this report being agreed and Secretary of State
approving the exclusions set out in this report. That is, the budgets do not include funding
for the items we have asked the Forum to consider retaining.
SECTION H: OTHER FORMULA ISSUES
Federations
Currently any schools that federate retain two separate budgets. The proposed
regulations would enable a single budget to be set for schools in a Federation, which
avoids funding having to be apportioned between schools. The proposed regulations
would also allow Council‟s to introduce formula factors in relation to schools that are
federated. For example, this could provide pump priming funding for new federations or
allow adjustments to be made due to efficiencies achieved by federating schools.
It is not intended to make any changes to Ealing‟s formula for 2011-12.
Early Years Funding Formula
These regulations cover the new arrangements for funding early years providers.
BSF Support to High Schools and Police in Schools
Within the lump sum factor for High Schools there is an allocation of £465,000 for BSF
support and £240,000 towards police officers in schools. Of the BSF funding only
£100,000 is now required, £50,000 each for Cardinal Wiseman and Dormers Wells High
Schools. The funding agreement for Police Officers in schools ceased at the end of
November and the MET Police are now funding these posts in full.
This leaves £605,000 to be re-allocated within the budget. In 2011-12 this amount will be
included in the calculation of the MFG, but it needs to be re-allocated through the formula.
Some of the funding will be reallocated to primary schools that join the expansion of places
capital programme in 2011. However, this will still leave the balance to be re-allocated to
schools.
It is proposed that this amount is used to:
Fund additional places required in High schools, particularly in Years 8 and 10;
The balance to be allocated through existing formula factors
Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC)
The CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme, previously known as the Carbon Reduction
Commitment, is a new mandatory energy saving and carbon emissions reduction scheme
for the UK. The CSR announced that the scheme will now operate as a tax but will still
provide some incentive to improve energy efficiency to reduce the level of tax.
The Local Authority is currently calculating its liability and Schools will have to share a
proportion of the new tax as the Schools estate is a large proportion of the Authorities
property portfolio. One option would be a top slice from the DSG and this will need to be
agreed in February 2011. The other is to allocate the tax to individual schools, though this
would be complex to implement.
The views of the Forum are welcomed.
4. Financial
Any financial implications of this report are financed within the ring fenced Dedicated
Schools Grant.
5. Legal
The Schools Forum Regulations 2010 require the council to consult the schools forum in
connection with the authorities functions relating to the schools budget, namely:
Arrangements for the education of pupils with special educational needs
Arrangements for the use of pupil referral units and the education of children otherwise
than at school
Arrangements for early years provision
Arrangements for insurance
Administrative arrangements for the allocation of central government grants paid to
schools via the authority
Arrangements for free school meals
The terms of any proposed contract for supplies or services (being a contract paid or to be
paid out of the authority‟s schools budget where the estimated value of the proposed
contract is not les that the threshold which applies to the authority for that proposed
contract pursuant to regulation 8 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 at least one
month prior to invitations to tender.
And any other matters concerning the funding of schools as the authority sees fit.
The Schools Finance (England) Regulations 2008 prescribe other matters on which the
Local Authority is required to consult or to seek the approval of the Schools Forum. The
government is consulting on draft Schools Finance (England ) Regulations 2011.
Under the current regulations the Local Authority is required to consult the forum on
changes to the formula for determination of school budget shares.
The Local Authority is required to seek the approval of the forum in relation to:
Breaches of the central expenditure limit
Increases in central expenditure on
Prudential borrowing
Termination of employment costs
Combined services
Schools‟ specific contingency
Special Educational Needs Transport
Changes to the Minimum Funding Guaruntee in specified circumstances
In each of these cases, the local authority can appeal to the DfE if the Schools Forum
rejects its proposal
Para 2A of Schedule 14 Schools Standards and Framework Act 1998 requires Local
Authorities to submit to the schools forum for approval any proposals to revise their
scheme for financing schools.
The DfE announced in December 2010 that Local Authorities may vary the operation of
the MFG in certain circumstances with the approval of the Schools Forum. These
circumstances are listed below. In all other cases proposals to vary the MFG must be
approved by the Secretary of State:
Where a variation to the coverage of the MFG (the list of exceptions in the
regulations which are outside its scope) has previously been approved by the
schools forum or Secretary of State and did not have a specified time limit; if it
applied only to the 2008-11 spending review period, for example, then a new
application would need to be made. Variations to the level of the MFG which were
for more than one year would not remain in place but would require a new
application to the Secretary of State;
The proposed variation applies to the implementation of the early years single
funding formula in isolation. It would therefore have to apply only to schools with
early years provision and not seek to exclude mainstreamed grants from the MFG
coverage;
The proposed variation would result in a higher level of MFG than -1.5% (for
example, -1% per pupil);
The proposed variation relates only to the Diploma formula grant, which has been
paid to schools based on actual numbers taking Diplomas, and/or the targeted
elements of primary and secondary National Strategies grant, which were given to
schools explicitly on a one-year basis.
LAs may, if they wish, apply for disapplication of the MFG in relation to other
mainstreamed grants and formula factors. Such proposals will need to be approved by the
Secretary of State.
6. Value For Money
This report is concerned with allocating funding between schools and for specific
purposes. In reaching decisions on these matters the Forum will want to satisfy itself that
the proposals in this report represent good value for money.
7. Sustainability Impact Appraisal
The proposal to introduce a Carbon Tax will encourage schools to improve energy
efficiency.
8. Risk Management
The report identifies significant risks associated with changes in the grant funding system
and increases in population and proposes ways in which the risks can be managed.
9. Community Safety
None.
10. Links to the 5 Priorities for the Borough
The report is concerned with securing educational services for children and young people
and in also ensuring that value for money in delivered.
11. Equalities, Human Rights and Community Cohesion
The report is concerned with seeking the views of the Schools Forum. With regard to
school baseline budgets it is proposed to set these on a very similar basis to 2010-11 so
no policy changes to the formula are proposed. The introduction of the pupil premium is a
national policy initiative, which the authority is required to pass on to schools. Some
centrally retained services are funded by grants that are to be mainstreamed. The Council
has asked the Forum to continue to fund certain of these services by increasing the
Central Expenditure Limit. If the limit is not increased the funds will be allocated to schools
directly. The Council has a right to appeal to the Secretary of State against the decision of
the Forum. Depending the decisions made by the Forum/Secretary of State, full EIAs may
be required when Cabinet is asked to consider proposals to bring centrally retained
expenditure within the agreed limit.
12. Staffing/Workforce and Accommodation implications:
There are potentially significant staffing implications but at this stage these are not
quantifiable.
13. Property and Assets
The Carbon Tax will provide an incentive for the service to monitor and reduce energy
consumption.
14. Any other implications
None.
15. Consultation
The purpose of this report is to consult the Schools Forum before decisions are made.
16. Timetable for Implementation
School budgets will be provided to schools by the end of March 2011
17. Appendices
Appendix 1: Further information on proposals for Strands 1 to 5
Appendix 2: Baseline School Budgets 2011-12
18. Background Information
DfE consultation documents on School Funding including the Pupil Premium.
DfE funding settlement for schools, various documents available from
www.education.gov.uk
Appendix 1
The future of Services to Schools in Ealing
Proposal to Schools Forum February 9th 2011
Managed Moves and SAFE Adolescent Service
£ per DSG funded
Areas £
pupil
Managed Moves £150,000 £4
SAFE Adolescent Service
£467,000 £11
(9fte staff)
Managed Moves
The funding requested would replace Ealing high schools current system of a per pupil charge for managed
moves to EOTAS provision. Funding the cost as part of a schools‟ contribution would spread the cost
equally across all schools. The per pupil charge has been debated by schools over the last year and this
option could present a preferable alternative for schools. However, it would mean that schools that did not
refer any or many students would pay the same as a school using more places. The EOTAS service relies
on this funding to make provision for managed moves and the service would cease if funding were not
secured to make the provision.
SAFE Adolescent Service
The School Development Grant (previously BIP/BEST funding) has financed schools facing posts in the
SAFE AS and allowed development of a multi-agency early intervention model of delivery in high schools.
This funding is now directly passported to schools.
Requested funding will maintain the existing number of Cluster Coordinators / Behaviour Consultants in
SAFE AS and continue the good access in high schools for young people and staff to specialist advice and
support, through mental health interventions, Clinical Psychology, substance misuse and specialist family
work. The funding will safeguard the existing service provided in each secondary school whilst the SAFE
AS model is reviewed in partnership with schools in the light of government strategy.
Behaviour and Attendance Consultant
This post supports secondary and primary schools in behaviour and attendance, SEAL and particularly the
National Programme for Specialist Leaders in Behaviour and Attendance (NPSLBA). The current cohort of
65 school staff includes SLT members, teaching and support staff working on action research projects in 11
secondary schools, I special school and 6 primaries. Heads‟ evaluations received for the first cohort to
graduate have been excellent with regard to the impact in schools. The work has been extended in Ealing
and is offered at Masters Level in partnership with Middlesex University who also contribute to funding the
local delivery in Ealing. In addition, the role provides: B&A leadership support and challenge; behaviour
networks, cross school collaboration and sharing of good practice; specific behaviour interventions e.g. roll
out of „deep dive‟ review of high school behaviour pilot; sharing of research, expertise and advice in a variety
of forums, seminars and meetings; support for non teaching support staff needs e.g. the learning mentors‟
forum.
The capacity building for B&A across Ealing schools could not be facilitated by the LA without the post and
the current NPSLBA cohorts of school staff would need to be revised and possibly phased out over the next
3-6 months if no funding were secured.
School Improvement and School Partnerships
Ealing LA is modelling the prioritisation of services to schools from April 2011 to ensure that we are in a
strong position to meet expectations outlined in the recent White Paper (November 2010) and those likely to
arise from the SEN Green Paper and Education Bill.
A strong role for local Authorities in “driving up standards for all children in all schools”
LA as champions of educational excellence and choice for parents and children
Supporting schools who want to work together to share expertise
First in line to tackle failure where it exists – supporting schools below new floor to improve or
convert to Academy status
Supporting vulnerable pupils including SEN and LAC to access high quality provision that meets
their needs
This paper sets out how we proposed to resource our statutory functions and how we might best support the
needs of schools (as expressed through detailed consultations and an external review compiled by Price
Waterhouse Coopers) in the context of significant funding challenges.
Our approach to school improvement in Ealing in recent years has been underpinned by the value we attach
to interdependence and collective responsibility for outcomes. We are committed to tackling intractable
challenges facing children and young people, such as closing attainment gaps, by strengthening networks
and collaboration. We believe that by fostering innovation, developing leadership and sharing expertise, we
are more likely to find new solutions to these challenges. This proposal sets out an offer to all schools to
support them in driving their improvement priorities
We recognise the considerable challenge of retaining a high quality team, with the local intelligence and
qualities needed to work in partnership with schools, with an overall central budget of just over £1.2M
compared with the £6.2M used to support School Improvement and Partnerships in previous years.
We are therefore seeking a contribution from schools of up to £1.37M for School Improvement and 525K
for Partnerships over the next two years, via the new DSG (grants previously used to fund these services)
to fund a new Schools Effectiveness Service. This service will not only be fit to meet our statutory
requirements but also responsive in supporting schools to meet current and new challenges. This initial two
year investment will support the realisation of the following broad aims:
To develop and implement, in partnership with schools, a local vision for excellence and innovation
To fulfil all statutory functions to a high standard including providing professional challenge to
schools causing concern, brokering support where needed, quality assuring provision for SEN
students and commissioning high quality post 16 provision
To work with wider children‟s services to ensure coherent and effective support for children so that
every child is able to succeed
To facilitate networks and partnerships that sustain and further develop the capacity of schools to
respond effectively to the challenges and opportunities within the new national context
To deliver high quality improvement services, upon request, within and beyond the LA, and facilitate
schools who wish to extend their role as partners in sharing services and expertise
By 2013, we anticipate that our new ways of working will have reached a level of maturity that will support
the evolution of a more sophisticated buy-back model or SLA through local agreements with clusters of
schools working together. The funding and service delivery scenarios are outlined below.
Services to schools – What will schools get under different funding scenarios?
Current scenario
Two separate service areas “School Improvement” and “School Partnerships”
School Improvement 2010 – 2011
Core 1.097M
Grants 3.1M
Total 4.2M
72 FTE + 25 SIPS
Staffing deployed to carry out statutory duties:
School Improvement Partners – Challenge; Monitoring standards; target-setting; advising Headteacher
performance management
Management of SIPs
School categorisation for support
Intervention in schools in inverse proportion to need
Schools Causing Concern (2006 Education Act)
- intervention;
- monitoring;
- driving improvement;
- appointing new governors
- internal inspection;
- warning notices
- IEBs
- establishing federations or improvement partnerships;
- school closure
SEN monitoring and provision, quality assurance, access, accountability
Early Intervention programmes
14-19 Commissioning
14-19 Information Advice and Guidance
Early Years Foundation Stage and KS1 and KS2 moderation
Inspection of provision for Children Educated at Home
Newly Qualified Teachers reporting and independent quality assurance function and additional core
functions linked to local priorities (facilitation, delivery linked to CYPP) include
Leadership development programmes
Senior and middle leader networks for schools
Speech and Language Programme provision
Packages of support to improve provision, teaching and learning, behaviour and attendance in
EYFS, KS1, KS2, KS3, KS4
Ethnic Minority Achievement Service
Travellers Service
Music Service
Sports Partnerships
City Learning Centres (ICT)
Ealing Diploma and Enterprise Centre- Facilitation and QA
Education Action Zone Northolt Learning Partnership- support
Integrated Working Pilots in areas of high deprivation
Support for raising attainment and closing gaps at all key stages
Support for curriculum development at all key stages
Senior level support including support for self-evaluation and Ofsted issues
Facilitation of school to school support links
School Partnerships 2010 – 2011
Core 120K
Grants and other funding 2.2M
Total 2.32M
36 FTE
Staffing deployed to carry out strategic duties:
CPD and Ealing Education Centre
Communications including EGfL
Governance development (inc strategy, self-review,
Governance support – database, GB advice, support to clerks
Workforce development (inc restructuring, performance management, generic job roles)
Health development and partnerships (inc Pyramid Scheme, HRBS, PSHE)
Extended schools (inc core offer, income/resource generation, multi-agency infrastructure)
Children‟s Workforce
Community cohesion (inc. anti-bullying)
Locality working and commissioning
School Improvement and Partnership 2010 – 2011
Core 1.217M
Grants 5.3 M
Total 6.217 M
108 FTE
Service Planning from April 2011
Scenario 1 – No bid
A slim service to the council (combining previous functions under School Improvement and
Partnerships) for delivery of statutory functions, priorities agreed by the council to serve residents,
in consultation with schools
Funding: Central core only 1.217M
2011 - 2012 2012 – 2013 2013 - 2014
1.217M 1M 900K
14-15 FTE estimate inc 13 FTE estimate inc admin 11 FTE estimate inc admin
admin*
Monitoring quality and provision
Monitoring of schools – mainly desk-top approach
Challenge to schools BELOW new government floor target - use of intervention powers where
necessary for schools causing concern – brokering and monitoring structural interventions and
improvement partnerships (not providing the support)
Minimum link contact with other schools – prioritised to anticipate schools at risk and identify issues
that need attention across more than one school
Very limited offer to some Level 3 schools of additional strategic support – brokerage of partnerships
Advice to Headteacher panels but buy-back for any recruitment advice
NQT Reporting – i.e. statutory administration not induction
16-19 Commissioning: Provision and Participation– area-wide strategy – mix and balanced provision
to meet needs of 16-19 year olds and secure full participation including LLDD (24)
SEN Monitoring, advice and guidance – shaped by Green Paper (likely to increase)
Monitoring of provision for Children Educated at Home
SACRE – Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education – monitoring, guidance
Support for school governance membership – data-base
Communications and knowledge sharing
Information sharing through minimal briefing structure i.e. HT briefings; leadership networks focused
on area-wide priorities
EGFL Basic Infrastructure – gatekeeping – Director‟s Report
Contractual
Ongoing contractual arrangements e.g. EDEC
*Excludes Music Service and Travellers Service (separate review following grant announcements)
Scenario 2 - Proposal to Schools Forum with options strands
A service, shaped around the areas schools have identified as having highest priority or greatest
value in recent consultations. Full proposal builds capacity for service evolution through income
generation from schools and wider clients – i.e. for longer term sustainability
Core + agreement by schools on retained funding – up to 1.9M
2011 - 2012 2012 – 2013 2013 - 2014
1.217 1M 900K
Top-slice up to 1.376M School Improvement + 525k Partnerships = 1.901Million
Maximum combined service total 3.17M
Maximum FTE Total up to 44 inc admin*
What this might look like for schools?
In addition to those elements highlighted above, additional capacity would be retained to develop strategic
leadership of a coherent, integrated locality focused service. The exact offer to schools will be shaped by the
resource agreed by Schools Forum, the staffing available and the priorities identified by schools. Some
services will be a universal offer and others might be offered on a buy back basis. Capacity to facilitate work
with schools to bid for additional resources e.g. the new Collaboration Incentive and Education Endowment
Fund would also be possible.
Strand 1. Supporting, Achievement and Curriculum (up to 6 posts 465k)
Capacity to provide additional entitlement to link officer support according to school needs – share
local intelligence; anticipate risks; broker support; signpost resources across Children‟s Services i.e.
wider, broader remit than current SIP (all schools - offer to be refined)
Additional Capacity to provide support for senior leaders e.g HTPM advice, departmental reviews
(buy back)
Capacity to support self-evaluation and quality assurance including facilitating peer support (partly
on buy back basis)
Facilitation of some existing and evolving senior and middle leadership networks as vehicle for
sharing effective practice and developing collaborative approaches to common challenges e.g.
curriculum change; new arrivals strategy (all schools)
Capacity to provide support and advice on areas of local priority e.g. transitions, e-learning,
assessment, literacy, foundation learning (partly on buy-back basis)
Capacity to facilitate further specific school-to-school support to meet challenges of new policy
agenda e.g. KS1 Reading assessment, National Curriculum Change and English Bacc (all schools-
offer to be refined)
Strand 2. Supporting e-learning - CLC offer – see separate bid (up to 5 posts 278k)
New ICT/MLE support offer through transition from CLC to school-based support menu 2012-2013
Strand 3. Supporting Leadership and Professional Development
(1 School Improvement post 75K + 1 Partnerships post 75K)
Leadership and administration to support the continuation and extension of school to school
networks, learning communities and cluster projects determined by school needs (all schools)
Facilitation of links with NCSL – Middle leadership clusters (all schools)
Potential to offer development programme for NQTs, ASTs and Leading Teachers (all schools)
Leadership and administration of a school-to-school directory and web-based system for exchanging
resources and expertise (all schools)
Management of training and development activities for schools including on-line booking system (all
schools)
Support for change management processes and staff restructures (basic entitlement plus buy
back)
Support for strengthening governance (basic entitlement all schools)
Strand 4 Supporting Inclusion (up to 7 posts 493k)
SEN Leadership development support (basic entitlement for all schools)
Capacity to support schools in developing and implementing SEN strategy including effective
provision mapping
Capacity to support schools in responding to outcomes of SEN Green Paper
Capacity to support schools in Gap Closing projects – including bids for additional funding
Capacity to provide and co-ordinate parental -school links with local BME communities – (partly buy
back)
Capacity to support schools in developing strategy for new arrivals – (partly buy back)
Continuation of Early Intervention Programmes ECAT; ECC; ECAR
Strand 5 Supporting Integrated working (Partnerships up to 6 posts 450K)
Area-based multi-agency partnership infrastructure to support wider development of children
(especially most vulnerable/disadvantaged) building upon quadrants and extended school
partnerships i.e. link professional/central coordinator for areas in Ealing- intended to improve
interface between schools and wider support services for children (all schools)
Support for health development and education – and in targeting health inequalities (Schools‟ role
Public Health White Paper Dec 2010)- (all schools)
* Ealing Education Centre is not included here because it is part of separate SLA with schools. Its
future depends on the configuration of teams under scenario 2.
Ealing Music Service is not included in this proposal – awaiting grant position
Ealing Travellers’ Service – separate review
Schools will want to know what level of support they can expect if the service is developed through
this proposal. We will provide some more detailed illustrations linked to each strand following the
th
Schools Forum pre-meeting on 20 January.
Strand 2 is included as a separate paper for consideration.
th
Paper presented to Schools Forum pre-meeting 20 January 2011 by
Julie Lewis – Assistant Director School Improvement
Bob Anderson – Assistant Director Partnerships
Strand 2 Summary of proposal for future City Learning Centre services
Bid £278 Staffing cost
A business plan is currently being developed by the CLC Director that will provide detailed background
information and analysis to support this document. This summary provides a brief overview of the proposed
services for the next financial year and the resources required to support the plan until the project becomes
self-financing.
Rationale
The proposal is being developed in reponse to the cut in revenue and capital funding to the CLC
programme from April 2011. Even in the context of reduced school budgets and changing national
educational priorities we believe that there is a real need for schools to ensure that they use technology
effectively to support improvement and to reduce the risks of poor investment. Reduction in CLC and IT
services across London provide additional opportunities to fill the gaps and generate income.
Scope
The proposal covers a range of services to be provided directly and with some external partners for schools
in Ealing and the surrounding area. The key areas of service are:
Services Further information
1. Strategic and development support for ICT In partnership with Co-centra. Programme of
including: CPD modules developed with exclusive rights to
- Leadership, project management, change deliver to neighbouring London boroughs.
management and transformation support Range of packages available from £400 - £2500.
- Support for the MLE and other digital teaching Capacity to deliver from current contacts and by
and learning developments developing school based staff.
- Curriculum change design and support
- CPD and operational training
- Safeguarding
2. Technological developments (cloud Discussions with BT – service being developed –
services) CPD and change leadership support - income from per pupil fee included in contract
with BT. Capacity to deliver from staff, current
contacts and by developing school based staff.
3. Curriculum development and delivery:14-19 Development of core CLC role.
including provision of sessional staff to schools, Potential for school based „CLC‟ sites to promote
curriculum workshops and commissioning hub developments in teaching and learning as part of
for school to school support in relation to ICT the new teaching school infrastructure.
(linked to school based „CLC‟ locations and Capacity to deliver from current staff and
potential teaching school developments) contacts and by developing school based staff.
4. International partnerships - support for Scope for service to be provided outside Ealing.
schools to access a range of international Income from admin fee.
opportunities
Scope
The range of services builds on the success of the current CLC offer and the perceived needs of
schools. All services have the potential to be self financing and could be run by schools in the future.
All aspects of the offer with the exception of the site based lettings for Acton could take place without
the Acton site although it would be preferable if the site could continue the legacy as an outreach centre
with promoting the innovative use of ICT in teaching and learning if developed as a Sixth Form centre.
Objectives
The objectives of the services are;
to ensure that schools in Ealing and beyond remain at the cutting edge in the use of
technology to support teaching, learning and achievement
to link schools with international opportunities to inform school improvement and global
links
to support schools in cost effective ICT development including curriculum delivery
Success criteria
Initially success criteria will be linked to the operation of the service and income generated as well as
the impact on pupil outcomes as evaluated by the schools. The service will be required to break even
within a financial year.
Risks and Constraints
The follow areas could prevent or constrain the success of the proposal:
Contextual challenges – changing to a more competitive and commercial approach requires a
change in culture and skill set including effective marketing of the services
Competitors – there may be other organisations providing similar services including schools
Capacity – ensuring that there is sufficient capacity to meet commitments.
Assumptions
The main assumption is that there will be funding available for one year to support the development of
the model. Depending on the scope of the model the following funding is requested:
Staffing : CLC Strategic Manager, CLC Programme Development Manager, CLC Lead Teacher
(Curriculum Design and Development), CLC Technical Support, CLC Administrator (£277,289)
Some additional revenue costs for consumables and accommodation (£50,000)
It is assumed that some income could be generated within the first term to cover some of these costs. If
the Acton building is available for 2011-12 the lettings income could also off set some of the costs but
costs of running the building would be incurred.
Quality assurance
All new services will be trialled and quality assured with initial customers. Some aspects of the
service are building on existing services which have received positive feedback. All services will be
evaluated by customers and adapted in response. External staff will require references and
recommendations.
Angela Doherty
January 2011
First Indicative School Budgets Appendix 2
Total Add Add Early Total Indicative FSM
Add YPLA Add Pupil
DfE No School Name Formula Mainstreamed ADD MFG Years Indicative Pupil Entitlement
2010-11 Premium
Factors Grants Formula Allocation Numbers Pupils
2005 Berrymede Junior 1,391,098 228,686 19,040 0 67,510 1,706,334 309 157
2006 Berrymede Infant 1,203,237 181,049 0 56,534 58,910 1,499,731 271 137
2022 East Acton Primary 974,067 176,682 2,516 113,068 36,980 1,303,314 214 86
2033 Oldfields Primary 1,283,345 220,713 11,059 110,807 27,090 1,653,013 345 63
2046 North Ealing Primary 1,815,160 165,797 0 113,068 13,760 2,107,786 477 32
2058 St John's Primary 1,669,408 253,683 133,291 162,818 55,040 2,274,241 326 128
2059 St Mark's Primary 1,273,218 147,496 4,488 108,546 26,660 1,560,408 328 62
2067 West Twyford Primary 923,638 164,938 41,514 104,023 22,790 1,256,903 210 53
2071 West Acton Primary 1,694,677 245,407 0 110,807 55,470 2,106,361 432 129
2076 Mayfield Primary 1,160,266 181,114 0 94,977 27,520 1,463,878 303 64
2083 Beaconsfield Primary 960,517 176,514 27,929 117,591 27,520 1,310,071 215 64
2088 Costons Primary 1,742,966 269,831 6,124 119,852 47,300 2,186,074 416 110
2092 Downe Manor Primary 1,647,196 215,485 11,286 117,591 46,870 2,038,427 379 109
2094 Drayton Green Primary 1,264,915 181,743 145,557 79,148 38,270 1,709,633 229 89
2115 North Primary 1,583,188 200,528 41,731 0 27,950 1,853,398 428 65
2121 Ravenor Primary 1,870,431 261,331 0 124,375 54,610 2,310,747 445 127
2125 Selborne Primary 1,669,377 221,431 1,663 108,546 35,690 2,036,707 400 83
2150 Hambrough Primary 1,492,654 202,166 32,178 223,875 33,110 1,983,983 413 77
2151 Hobbayne Primary 1,905,139 195,058 0 113,068 39,130 2,252,396 451 91
2153 John Perryn Primary 1,599,489 300,176 0 110,807 81,270 2,091,742 393 189
2154 Southfield Primary 1,589,788 213,972 7,573 108,546 49,020 1,968,899 409 114
2161 Allenby Primary 1,224,970 167,402 84,386 113,068 21,930 1,611,757 215 51
2162 Blair Peach Primary 1,543,777 220,566 9,725 223,875 29,240 2,027,183 414 68
2163 Clifton Primary 1,198,301 187,273 0 113,068 35,690 1,534,333 301 83
2164 Dairy Meadow Primary 1,526,809 202,161 0 196,739 34,830 1,960,539 407 81
2165 Derwentwater Primary 2,377,978 334,186 0 203,523 91,590 3,007,277 621 213
2166 Durdan's Park Primary 1,637,798 221,700 0 223,875 33,540 2,116,913 404 78
2167 Fielding Primary 2,421,910 219,747 0 223,875 14,190 2,879,722 679 33
Total Add Add Early Total Indicative FSM
Add YPLA Add Pupil
DfE No School Name Formula Mainstreamed ADD MFG Years Indicative Pupil Entitlement
2010-11 Premium
Factors Grants Formula Allocation Numbers Pupils
2168 Gifford Primary 2,819,614 333,986 17,564 217,091 100,620 3,488,875 560 234
2169 Greenwood Primary 1,594,000 197,189 0 115,330 31,390 1,937,909 399 73
2170 Havelock Primary 1,448,267 256,545 0 160,557 59,340 1,924,709 349 138
2171 Horsenden Primary 2,620,436 328,415 2,784 226,137 30,960 3,208,732 718 72
2172 Willow Tree Primary 2,443,539 326,257 65,921 226,137 87,720 3,149,574 620 204
2173 Lady Margaret Primary 2,138,648 262,522 9,904 110,807 54,180 2,576,062 568 126
2174 Little Ealing Primary 1,719,299 164,455 0 176,387 9,460 2,069,600 475 22
2175 Oaklands Primary 1,569,955 217,778 2,599 176,387 55,040 2,021,758 407 128
2176 Perivale Primary 1,517,838 187,371 0 113,068 24,940 1,843,217 415 58
2177 Stanhope Primary 2,018,014 253,642 12,929 113,068 56,330 2,453,983 517 131
2178 Viking Primary 937,766 164,135 40,144 115,330 30,100 1,287,475 197 70
2179 Wolf Fields Primary 1,266,970 206,348 18,092 117,591 28,810 1,637,811 322 67
2180 Featherstone Primary 2,571,704 351,586 0 217,091 82,560 3,222,942 582 192
2181 Three Bridges Primary 1,429,106 239,579 28,102 113,068 64,930 1,874,785 333 151
2182 Montpelier Primary 2,236,047 228,921 0 117,591 33,970 2,616,529 610 79
2183 Tudor Primary 1,197,771 198,436 57,023 110,807 25,800 1,589,837 286 60
2184 Hathaway Primary 1,519,420 251,499 6,317 110,807 67,940 1,955,983 359 158
2185 Brentside Primary 1,390,026 217,086 24,000 106,284 46,440 1,783,836 324 108
2186 Vicar's Green Primary 879,335 154,030 14,561 104,023 12,470 1,164,419 197 29
2187 Grange Primary 2,298,485 302,148 0 135,682 61,060 2,797,375 590 142
3301 Christchurch Junior 1,204,127 133,119 0 0 16,770 1,354,016 336 39
3302 St Saviour's Infant 987,525 95,515 0 124,375 8,170 1,215,585 268 19
3500 Mount Carmel Primary 1,371,447 138,852 0 115,330 5,160 1,630,789 415 12
3503 OLOV Primary 1,451,305 162,383 0 115,330 15,910 1,744,928 421 37
3504 St John Fisher Primary 1,473,027 165,896 0 115,330 8,600 1,762,853 417 20
3505 St Anselm's Primary 868,441 155,850 25,187 99,500 27,520 1,176,498 202 64
3506 St Gregory's Primary 1,602,435 137,966 0 113,068 11,180 1,864,650 444 26
3507 St Joseph's Primary 1,463,012 186,302 2,142 117,591 17,200 1,786,248 417 40
3508 St Raphael's Primary 1,445,028 160,753 104 117,591 13,760 1,737,236 413 32
3509 St Vincent's Primary 1,480,756 172,753 0 80,457 33,540 1,767,507 419 78
Total Add Add Early Total Indicative FSM
Add YPLA Add Pupil
DfE No School Name Formula Mainstreamed ADD MFG Years Indicative Pupil Entitlement
2010-11 Premium
Factors Grants Formula Allocation Numbers Pupils
3510 Edward Betham Primary 1,525,250 171,944 183 106,284 22,360 1,826,021 419 52
3511 Petts Hill Primary 986,418 166,423 39,830 110,807 37,840 1,341,318 197 88
5200 Wood End Junior 1,284,660 190,553 0 0 41,280 1,516,493 343 96
5201 Wood End Infant 1,309,245 150,874 7,006 226,137 33,110 1,726,372 329 77
5202 Dormer's Wells Junior 1,525,311 269,408 0 0 63,640 1,858,360 376 148
5203 Dormer's Wells Infant 1,114,160 165,328 0 214,830 39,560 1,533,878 268 92
3512 New Khalsa Prim School 787,508 59,882 243,241 117,591 8,170 1,216,391 155 19
Total Primary 100,141,213 13,482,565 1,197,693 0 8,153,539 2,501,310 125,476,320 25,101 5,817
4020 Villiers High 5,393,531 1,179,216 0 417,439 140,180 7,130,367 1,085 326.00
4030 Dormers Wells High 4,686,202 1,522,765 7,660 760,349 134,160 7,111,137 890 312.00
4031 Featherstone High 6,013,594 1,519,192 23,066 1,545,254 162,540 9,263,646 1,198 378.00
4035 Acton High 6,509,386 1,798,472 129,970 193,070 8,630,899 1,196 449.00
4036 Elthorne Park High 4,395,101 772,122 0 629,549 65,360 5,862,132 896 152.00
4602 Twyford High 4,471,964 819,401 0 2,338,072 46,010 7,675,448 947 107.00
4603 Cardinal Wiseman High 7,025,971 1,064,306 0 2,008,505 73,960 10,172,742 1,520 172.00
5400 Brentside High 5,566,293 1,488,461 142,296 1,094,711 145,340 8,437,101 1,110 338.00
5401 Greenford High 6,267,171 1,288,663 14,423 3,127,311 137,170 10,834,737 1,201 319.00
5402 Ellen Wilkinson High 4,939,338 955,433 29,984 2,028,583 143,620 8,096,958 1,063 334.00
5403 Drayton Manor High 5,655,927 1,154,297 0 2,199,371 138,890 9,148,485 1,197 323.00
5404 Northolt High 5,630,386 1,127,979 0 1,337,644 135,450 8,231,459 1,163 315.00
Total High 66,554,866 14,690,307 347,400 17,486,788 1,515,750 100,595,111 13,466 3,525
Grand Total 166,696,079 28,172,872 1,545,092 17,486,788 8,153,539 4,017,060 226,071,431 38,567 9,342
Illustration of additional funding per pupil for each of the Service Proposals. Actual allocations will depend on the
Formula agreed following consultation with the Schools Forum
Behaviour
School Diploma
Managed Service &
EOTAS @ Strand 1 Strand 2 Strand 3 Stand 4 Strand 5 Sports Formula
Moves @ SAFE
DfE No School Name £5 per @ £12 @ £7 per @ £4 per @ £12 @ £11 Partnerships Grant @ Total
£4 per Adolescence
pupil per pupil pupil pupil per pupil per pupil @ £2 per £2 per
pupil Service @
pupil pupil
£11 per pupil
2005 Berrymede Junior 1,545 1,236 3,399 3,708 2,163 1,236 3,708 3,399 618 618 21,630
2006 Berrymede Infant 1,355 1,084 2,981 3,252 1,897 1,084 3,252 2,981 542 542 18,970
2022 East Acton Primary 1,070 856 2,354 2,568 1,498 856 2,568 2,354 428 428 14,980
2033 Oldfields Primary 1,725 1,380 3,795 4,140 2,415 1,380 4,140 3,795 690 690 24,150
2046 North Ealing Primary 2,385 1,908 5,247 5,724 3,339 1,908 5,724 5,247 954 954 33,390
2058 St John's Primary 1,630 1,304 3,586 3,912 2,282 1,304 3,912 3,586 652 652 22,820
2059 St Mark's Primary 1,640 1,312 3,608 3,936 2,296 1,312 3,936 3,608 656 656 22,960
2067 West Twyford Primary 1,050 840 2,310 2,520 1,470 840 2,520 2,310 420 420 14,700
2071 West Acton Primary 2,160 1,728 4,752 5,184 3,024 1,728 5,184 4,752 864 864 30,240
2076 Mayfield Primary 1,515 1,212 3,333 3,636 2,121 1,212 3,636 3,333 606 606 21,210
2083 Beaconsfield Primary 1,075 860 2,365 2,580 1,505 860 2,580 2,365 430 430 15,050
2088 Costons Primary 2,080 1,664 4,576 4,992 2,912 1,664 4,992 4,576 832 832 29,120
2092 Downe Manor Primary 1,895 1,516 4,169 4,548 2,653 1,516 4,548 4,169 758 758 26,530
2094 Drayton Green Primary 1,145 916 2,519 2,748 1,603 916 2,748 2,519 458 458 16,030
2115 North Primary 2,140 1,712 4,708 5,136 2,996 1,712 5,136 4,708 856 856 29,960
2121 Ravenor Primary 2,225 1,780 4,895 5,340 3,115 1,780 5,340 4,895 890 890 31,150
2125 Selborne Primary 2,000 1,600 4,400 4,800 2,800 1,600 4,800 4,400 800 800 28,000
2150 Hambrough Primary 2,065 1,652 4,543 4,956 2,891 1,652 4,956 4,543 826 826 28,910
2151 Hobbayne Primary 2,255 1,804 4,961 5,412 3,157 1,804 5,412 4,961 902 902 31,570
2153 John Perryn Primary 1,965 1,572 4,323 4,716 2,751 1,572 4,716 4,323 786 786 27,510
2154 Southfield Primary 2,045 1,636 4,499 4,908 2,863 1,636 4,908 4,499 818 818 28,630
2161 Allenby Primary 1,075 860 2,365 2,580 1,505 860 2,580 2,365 430 430 15,050
2162 Blair Peach Primary 2,070 1,656 4,554 4,968 2,898 1,656 4,968 4,554 828 828 28,980
2163 Clifton Primary 1,505 1,204 3,311 3,612 2,107 1,204 3,612 3,311 602 602 21,070
2164 Dairy Meadow Primary 2,035 1,628 4,477 4,884 2,849 1,628 4,884 4,477 814 814 28,490
2165 Derwentwater Primary 3,105 2,484 6,831 7,452 4,347 2,484 7,452 6,831 1,242 1,242 43,470
Illustration of additional funding per pupil for each of the Service Proposals. Actual allocations will depend on the
Formula agreed following consultation with the Schools Forum
Behaviour
School Diploma
Managed Service &
EOTAS @ Strand 1 Strand 2 Strand 3 Stand 4 Strand 5 Sports Formula
Moves @ SAFE
DfE No School Name £5 per @ £12 @ £7 per @ £4 per @ £12 @ £11 Partnerships Grant @ Total
£4 per Adolescence
pupil per pupil pupil pupil per pupil per pupil @ £2 per £2 per
pupil Service @
pupil pupil
£11 per pupil
2166 Durdan's Park Primary 2,020 1,616 4,444 4,848 2,828 1,616 4,848 4,444 808 808 28,280
2167 Fielding Primary 3,395 2,716 7,469 8,148 4,753 2,716 8,148 7,469 1,358 1,358 47,530
2168 Gifford Primary 2,800 2,240 6,160 6,720 3,920 2,240 6,720 6,160 1,120 1,120 39,200
2169 Greenwood Primary 1,995 1,596 4,389 4,788 2,793 1,596 4,788 4,389 798 798 27,930
2170 Havelock Primary 1,745 1,396 3,839 4,188 2,443 1,396 4,188 3,839 698 698 24,430
2171 Horsenden Primary 3,590 2,872 7,898 8,616 5,026 2,872 8,616 7,898 1,436 1,436 50,260
2172 Willow Tree Primary 3,100 2,480 6,820 7,440 4,340 2,480 7,440 6,820 1,240 1,240 43,400
2173 Lady Margaret Primary 2,840 2,272 6,248 6,816 3,976 2,272 6,816 6,248 1,136 1,136 39,760
2174 Little Ealing Primary 2,375 1,900 5,225 5,700 3,325 1,900 5,700 5,225 950 950 33,250
2175 Oaklands Primary 2,035 1,628 4,477 4,884 2,849 1,628 4,884 4,477 814 814 28,490
2176 Perivale Primary 2,075 1,660 4,565 4,980 2,905 1,660 4,980 4,565 830 830 29,050
2177 Stanhope Primary 2,585 2,068 5,687 6,204 3,619 2,068 6,204 5,687 1,034 1,034 36,190
2178 Viking Primary 985 788 2,167 2,364 1,379 788 2,364 2,167 394 394 13,790
2179 Wolf Fields Primary 1,610 1,288 3,542 3,864 2,254 1,288 3,864 3,542 644 644 22,540
2180 Featherstone Primary 2,910 2,328 6,402 6,984 4,074 2,328 6,984 6,402 1,164 1,164 40,740
2181 Three Bridges Primary 1,665 1,332 3,663 3,996 2,331 1,332 3,996 3,663 666 666 23,310
2182 Montpelier Primary 3,050 2,440 6,710 7,320 4,270 2,440 7,320 6,710 1,220 1,220 42,700
2183 Tudor Primary 1,430 1,144 3,146 3,432 2,002 1,144 3,432 3,146 572 572 20,020
2184 Hathaway Primary 1,795 1,436 3,949 4,308 2,513 1,436 4,308 3,949 718 718 25,130
2185 Brentside Primary 1,620 1,296 3,564 3,888 2,268 1,296 3,888 3,564 648 648 22,680
2186 Vicar's Green Primary 985 788 2,167 2,364 1,379 788 2,364 2,167 394 394 13,790
2187 Grange Primary 2,950 2,360 6,490 7,080 4,130 2,360 7,080 6,490 1,180 1,180 41,300
3301 Christchurch Junior 1,680 1,344 3,696 4,032 2,352 1,344 4,032 3,696 672 672 23,520
3302 St Saviour's Infant 1,340 1,072 2,948 3,216 1,876 1,072 3,216 2,948 536 536 18,760
3500 Mount Carmel Primary 2,075 1,660 4,565 4,980 2,905 1,660 4,980 4,565 830 830 29,050
3503 OLOV Primary 2,105 1,684 4,631 5,052 2,947 1,684 5,052 4,631 842 842 29,470
3504 St John Fisher Primary 2,085 1,668 4,587 5,004 2,919 1,668 5,004 4,587 834 834 29,190
Illustration of additional funding per pupil for each of the Service Proposals. Actual allocations will depend on the
Formula agreed following consultation with the Schools Forum
Behaviour
School Diploma
Managed Service &
EOTAS @ Strand 1 Strand 2 Strand 3 Stand 4 Strand 5 Sports Formula
Moves @ SAFE
DfE No School Name £5 per @ £12 @ £7 per @ £4 per @ £12 @ £11 Partnerships Grant @ Total
£4 per Adolescence
pupil per pupil pupil pupil per pupil per pupil @ £2 per £2 per
pupil Service @
pupil pupil
£11 per pupil
3505 St Anselm's Primary 1,010 808 2,222 2,424 1,414 808 2,424 2,222 404 404 14,140
3506 St Gregory's Primary 2,220 1,776 4,884 5,328 3,108 1,776 5,328 4,884 888 888 31,080
3507 St Joseph's Primary 2,085 1,668 4,587 5,004 2,919 1,668 5,004 4,587 834 834 29,190
3508 St Raphael's Primary 2,065 1,652 4,543 4,956 2,891 1,652 4,956 4,543 826 826 28,910
3509 St Vincent's Primary 2,095 1,676 4,609 5,028 2,933 1,676 5,028 4,609 838 838 29,330
3510 Edward Betham Primary the 2,095 1,676 4,609 5,028 2,933 1,676 5,028 4,609 838 838 29,330
3511 Petts Hill Primary 985 788 2,167 2,364 1,379 788 2,364 2,167 394 394 13,790
5200 Wood End Junior 1,715 1,372 3,773 4,116 2,401 1,372 4,116 3,773 686 686 24,010
5201 Wood End Infant 1,645 1,316 3,619 3,948 2,303 1,316 3,948 3,619 658 658 23,030
5202 Dormer's Wells Junior 1,880 1,504 4,136 4,512 2,632 1,504 4,512 4,136 752 752 26,320
5203 Dormer's Wells Infant 1,340 1,072 2,948 3,216 1,876 1,072 3,216 2,948 536 536 18,760
3512 New Khalsa Prim School 775 620 1,705 1,860 1,085 620 1,860 1,705 310 310 10,850
Total Primary 125,505 100,404 276,111 301,212 175,707 100,404 301,212 276,111 50,202 50,202 1,757,070
4020 Villiers High 5,425 4,340 11,935 13,020 7,595 4,340 13,020 11,935 2,170 2,170 75,950
4030 Dormers Wells High 4,450 3,560 9,790 10,680 6,230 3,560 10,680 9,790 1,780 1,780 62,300
4031 Featherstone High 5,990 4,792 13,178 14,376 8,386 4,792 14,376 13,178 2,396 2,396 83,860
4035 Acton High 5,980 4,784 13,156 14,352 8,372 4,784 14,352 13,156 2,392 2,392 83,720
4036 Elthorne Park High 4,480 3,584 9,856 10,752 6,272 3,584 10,752 9,856 1,792 1,792 62,720
4602 Twyford High 4,735 3,788 10,417 11,364 6,629 3,788 11,364 10,417 1,894 1,894 66,290
4603 Cardinal Wiseman High 7,600 6,080 16,720 18,240 10,640 6,080 18,240 16,720 3,040 3,040 106,400
5400 Brentside High 5,550 4,440 12,210 13,320 7,770 4,440 13,320 12,210 2,220 2,220 77,700
5401 Greenford High 6,005 4,804 13,211 14,412 8,407 4,804 14,412 13,211 2,402 2,402 84,070
5402 Ellen Wilkinson High 5,315 4,252 11,693 12,756 7,441 4,252 12,756 11,693 2,126 2,126 74,410
5403 Drayton Manor High 5,985 4,788 13,167 14,364 8,379 4,788 14,364 13,167 2,394 2,394 83,790
5404 Northolt High 5,815 4,652 12,793 13,956 8,141 4,652 13,956 12,793 2,326 2,326 81,410
Total High 67,330 53,864 148,126 161,592 94,262 53,864 161,592 148,126 26,932 26,932 942,620
Grand Total 192,835 154,268 424,237 462,804 269,969 154,268 462,804 424,237 77,134 77,134 2,699,690
Consultation (Mandatory)
Name of consultee Post held Date Date Comments
Sent to response appear in
consultee received paragraph:
Internal
David Archibald Executive Director 18.1.11
Judith Finlay Director, C&F 18.1.11 Amendments to
recommendation
s
Dawn Calvert Head of Children‟s 18.1.11
Services Finance
Jane Batalona Legal Services 18.1.11 Legal and
Equalities
section
CSMT 18.1.11
High School Heads 18.1.11
Schools Forum Pre- 18.1.11
Mtg
Cllr Patricia Walker 19.1.11
Report History
Decision type: Urgency item?
Report no.: Report author and contact for queries:
Gary Redhead, AD Schools Planning & Resources 020 8825 5773