Embed
Email

What really happened to polish pres Smolensk Russia?

Document Sample
What really happened to polish pres Smolensk Russia?
Description

What really happened to polish president near Smolensk Russia on april 10th 2010?
Open questions, links to blogger' research; wealth of information, material for books, films, history, intelligence and politics research

Shared by: Zezowaty Zorro
Stats
views:
845
posted:
11/26/2011
language:
English
pages:
7
What really happened to polish president near

Smolensk Russia



Hidden in the woods west of Smolensk lies memorial site

http://wikimapia.org/3562319/pl/Las-Katyński of polish prisoners of war, executed

and buried there in the ground in 1940, on orders from Beria and Stalin, top bosses of

Soviet state. The POWs were not just simple prisoners, some 22000 officers, clerks,

clerics, teachers, postmen and policemen, carefully selected amid vast population, held

captive resulting the eastern front offensive of september 1939. They were deemed unfit

for communist „reeducation” i.e. they were patriotic and educated enough to resist

indoctrination and worse still – they could endanger the grand strategy of future

domination, after the dust of war settled and new elites should come to rule. They were

ethnically cleansed to make way for the „new elite”, when the time comes. This atrocity

was a social engineering act, decapitation od polish elite during the war, a barbaric mass

slaughter. It is carefully overseen in official soviet and russian historic books, that Hitler

started the second world war, but he was not alone. Pursuant Ribbentropp & Molotov

pact, the two totalitarian monsters devoured Poland, first Hitler on september 1 st 1939

and shortly thereafter Stalin on september 17 th. Military resistance was swiftly crushed

and vast legions taken prisoner. Very few know today, that not only were the Germans

cooperating with Russians during invasion, but thereafter too, exchanging prisoners

between them.



The selection in prisoner camps was completed by january-february 1940, so the secret

service NKVD could be given orders for extermination of useless eaters and class

enemies in march and april 1940, as soon as the ground unfroze enough to dig holes in

it, to start the executions. The process was highly efficient and meticulously optimized.

The victims dug the holes themselves, than stood in line on the brink of the grave. One

shot in the occiput, and the victim fell on the previous layer – the line before – no need

for carting the corpses. When the hole was full, another group of prisoners – soon to

take their place in the ground – covered the mass grave with the earth, prior to digging

the next hole for themselves. Murderous efficiency indeed.



The 70 anniversary of the april 1940 atrocities was special in every possible way. There

was a new imperial posture in Putin's harangues, intriguing articles in russian press, ripe

with innuendo and starting to deny the obvious and documented genocide. Then came

the 10th april and some people in Poland and in the world cannot come to senses to this

very day. Nothing adds up. It seems, as if the symbolic human offering from the past

was replayed, to commemorate the previous, to break the resistance of the victims, to

erase their memory in dutiful obedience once and for all. For ever.



The official delegation, the president, generals and staff came onbord state jet Tu-154

and allegedly all died in a crush upon landing, some 300 yards away from the tarmac and

as many from housings and city factories http://wikimapia.org/16031851/pl/Miejsce-

katastrofy-polskiego-samolotu-rządowego-TU-154M-numer-101-w-Smoleńsku. No

survivors. „Vsie pogibli”. If you think it is strange, wait a minute. There is more, there is

so much of it, you could swoon.

Blackout, propaganda

From the very first moment after the alleged crash you can see distinctive traces of

professional propaganda management. Although there were hundreds of reporters, tv

camera crews choke full with equipment present as well in the city, as on the nearby

memorial cemetery (pls consult the linked map), there was total blackout at first. No

reporters were allowed to the site, the area thoroughly blocked by hundreds of police

and military forces. All of this commotion could be seen on thousands of photos taken

nearby, but there are no known actual photos of the crash site just after the accident.

How is it possible, that noone took any pictures, bearing in mind, that nowadays

everybody carries a camera in his pocket? The answer is astoundingly simple: total

blackout. No onlookers were allowed and the guards were strictly forbidden to give any

information, most probably they were prohibited from carrying any electronic

equipment as well. It sounds incredible, but the whole area by the military aerodrome

was very easily sealed off, with hundreds of reporters camping outside the gate for

hours on end, begging for some information, material, wating to be allowed to the site

just to take some photos, literally 300 yards from the site. Nothing happened and noone

was let in. The only photos published come from official Kremlin presservice photo-op,

when the strongman Putin came to visit the place. Seems incredible, but wait, there was

one lucky reporter though, somebody shot the film allegedly from the site, all the world

have seen this on tv. You too, I could bet a house on it, but when in doubt just check.





Wiśniewski or the film from the moon

I am sure you can visualise the landing gear upside down and the broken airplane tail

amid heaps of wreckage, some fireman crew running in between. All of these pictures

come from Lucky Luke, the first man on the moon, as our friend blogger called him –

Moonwalker. Sławomir Wiśniewski, an unassumable polish state tv editor, sat in his

nearby hotelroom, when he heard something strange behind the window, looking out on

the airport runway. All of his crew was gone to the memorial cemetery. He grabbed his

private camera and run the 500 yards distance to the site, took the film, you could see on

tv and in the press and managed, after being caught with the military police, to walk

unscathed from the spot. He was the only person to have made actual pictures from the

alleged crash site, nobody else managed.



What is more strange still, he went to the reporters camping before the entrance gate,

begging to be let in, and shared with them what he allegedly saw. His film was aired an

hour later, edited, cut and commented upon, in polish and russian tv, within two minutes

interval, actually it came first on russia tv. From there the pictures were taken on air all

over the world. The only problem is, this material was unique. There is no other known

source of film material from the scene. Moonwalker was not only lucky, he was a

magician too, managing to edit and send the film for airing just an hour later. You could

say – the right person for the job and that is correct in an eerie way. What a remarkable

happenstance to have such a coldblooded tv editor right where he was needed. Just

grabbed his camera and took the pictures, when nobody else could be lucid enough to

grab for his phone and press the button. For me what is remarkable is the fact, that

nobody seems to care, that such a Lucky Luke could act as legitimate sole source of

pictures from such an event and everybody aires it, without asking any questions.



Crash site, vicinity

Please visit the site on linked map, you will see the unprobable entourage. The site lies

directly by the fence of Jakovlev airplane plant http://smaz.ru/ , the first russian plant,

manufacturing military aircraft, as early as 1922. The factory operates nowadays as a

repair plant, the aircraft coming and going from the plant's runway. In fact the co called

airport is nothing more as an office for civilian customers despatching military and other

cargo from the runway. Of course the military has all the tools, lifts, haulers, cranes for

moving heavy cargo in the factory and on the integrated runway. Any cargo, for example

complete airplane could be easily lifted and stored by the factory fence, without raising

any suspicion. The plant has the manpower, the know-how and the tools, in the end they

refurbish, move, assemble and dissasemble planes, move bulky cargo on lifts and operate

airtransport on the runway every day, so noone would notice. How is it for a strange

coincidence? Do not loose from your sights the undeniable fact, that the „crash” site sits

directly amid the factories and by living quarters of the city with over half a million

population. You should suppose when a turbojet airliner, weighing just short of 100 tons

crushes, there would be a hell of a fireball and a corresponding commotion? You would

be mistaken this time.



How about dimensions of the „crash” site? Please take measures of the concrete

pathway, beneath it lies the supposed crash ground. Pretty puny, if you ask me. How is it

possible, that a plane approaching with ca. 300 kmh velocity disintegrates on a pathway

covering surface equal to your backyard? Smells fishy indeed.





Noone saw the crush

Literally noone. We have numerous accounts of a dense fog, covering the city. The

witnesses do not agree with one another as to the time and the density of the fog, but

the fact remains, that nobody actually confirms to have seen a crash. Some say they

heard something, some other did not, but noone saw the fireball. Actually there was no

fire, because there were no traces of it on the wreckage. How about a ghost? Invisible

crash. Should such a monster of a jet crush into a ground in a city, all windows in half a

mile radius should be blown out, the hearing people deafened, and deaf people should

hear. Nothing of the sort here, just like maybe someone farted, but not sure where.

No fire on the „crash” site

Remember any photo from an aircrash? First and foremost in most of them is raging

fire inferno from the wreckage. The plane should have some 15 ton of jet fuel on board

on landing. It would not explode by the impact, but should be ignited through white hot

jet turbines, each weighing a couple of ton of metal, 600-800 Celsius heat should ignite

the fuel in torn fuel tanks to a heavenhigh blazing torch. Nothing happened. No fire to

speak of, some witnesses seeing firemen pouring water on some gardensize fires. What is

more amazing is absolute lack of any fuel trace on the ground. Noone found a trace of

the fuel, noone smelled it, no trace of the fuel (kerosene) on the wreckage. The kerosene

does not vaporise in the april temperatures 2-10 Celsius, therefore if it was in the broken

and torn fuel containers, it would leave a trace on them, not to speak of o huge lake of

blazing fuel, 15 tons of it makes for a nice pool, you could swim in. No trace thereof

seen or smelled on the ground or on the wreckage. The wreck was totally dry. How was

it possible? You tell me.





The fire, fog and satellite meteo

When you are at explaining the unaccounted for disappearance of a poolfull of kerosene

from the plane's tanks, you could find satellite meteo handy. As a matter of fact, there

are dozens of meteorologic craft above us flying and taking pictures in every possible

wavelenght. A couple of them work for NASA and are accesible online. One of our

bloggers – Albatros – crosschecked the satellite imagery for the place and found, that on

alleged crash day there were no fires, and surely no blazing fuel or jet turbine at

temperature say 800 Celsius, laying around. What is truly remarkable, is sensitivity of

thermal sensors. Albatros counted approximately the number of candlefires on the

memorial cemetery on april 10th. They leave temperature footprint clear enough for this

feat, so when no heat footprint was found on the „crash site” on april 10 th means there

were positively no fires there and the scattered heaps of scrap were cold. By the way, did

you notice on Moonwalker's film the firemen bravely stepping on the jet engine or

smoking cigarettes? If there would be any hot metal parts dipped in kerosene, nobody

could risk it without following injury...



What Albatros found to his amazement were distinct thermal fire footprints of three

hotspots blazing merrily on the „crash site” in the morning of… april 9 th , the day prior

to the alleged crash. Precognition? No way. The fires burned exactly where brave

Moonwalker filmed them. The fact remains, they burned (and were filmed) just the day

before, to be edited, ready and waiting for they airtime the next day. Who says is was

total chaos? Wrong. It looked like chaos, but was meticulously prepared and executed.

How else can you explain the fires burning the day before (and not the next)? You tell

me.

The wreckage, reconstruction

Remember the Lockerbie crash? Thousands of policemen carefully assembling tens of

thousands pieces of wreckage, found on the ground on literally dozens of square miles

overland, in o huge hangar, to reconstruct quasi-complete wreck, after moths worth of

specialist work. On such an occasion, without precedent in history, whereby perishes

president of a state, together with complete military general staff, as in the case of

Smolensk, it would be similar would not? Wrong. No reconstruction was undertaken.

Two days after the alleged crash, the debris was loaded on cars, carted a mile away and

unloaed on a heap on a concrete parking lot

http://wikimapia.org/16131597/pl/miejsce-rekonstrukcji-rozbitego-Tu-154M

The debris lay there undisturbed 1 ½ years already and nobody seems to care. Do you

find it strange? You are not alone. The „crash site” was cleaned and covered with a layer

of sand and concrete literally two days after crash. You can see the concrete on linked

satellite map.









The victims, luggage, remains

Remember the Lockerbie nad many others aircrash sites? What is common to all of

them are the passengers, the remains of luggage, strewn all over the place. Nothing of

the sort here. The witnesses or alleged witnesses with cameras (one professional

cameraman amongst them) saw no human remains, no victims, no luggage, no seats,

essentially nothing of the airplane inside, only disfigured wreckage of the fuselage. How

is it possible? By a real crash impossible.



What is more amazing is the total destruction of the craft. The plane was literally torn

into pieces, small shreds and splinters. I checked hundreds od aircrash photos and

looked up professionals. Not only I did not find a similar destruction anywhere in

history of aviation. I found nobody heard about something like it. The Lockerbie jet,

after midair explosion fell to the ground from nearly 10 kilometers altitude. Its pieces

were strewn over a long distances on the ground, but nevertheless, the fuselage touched

the ground mostly in one piece. The same applies to all other crashes, where there is no

large fire, destroying the fuselage and interior in one great fireball, after the impact.

Otherwise, no matter what the velocity or fall altitude, the plane should ground as a

complete one piece structure, be it disfigured, torn somehow, but surely not completely

shred into thousands of metal pieces! Nevertheless so looks the wreckage after the

alleged crash – a heap of scrap. Nobody saw the impact (the fog), nobody heard the

detonation (there was none), the plane just disintegrated. How? Try to explain, I cannot

otherwise that stating, someone just unloaed there a heap of cold scrap from the repair

plant.

The ironclad birch

The narrative in russian media, after a couple of days, was concentrated, and remains so,

on a so called „destruction by the tree”. In this narrative, some 12 m high birch should

have broken the plane wing, causing it to capot. The first problem is that the birch,

copied on photos in dozens of books, was broken and at the same time should have

broken a plane's wing. I challenge anybody having wood to spare to reproduce such a

feat- take any two branches/twigs and cut with one piece the other. Everytime, either

none or only one breaks, never both. It does not bother the russian officialdom. In their

books, reports and press it is official line: the ironclad birch broke the wing and in the

same act was broken. Physical nonsense, but so what, it is printed nevertheless, do not

take my word for it, please check for yourself.



The officials in Russia remain unperturbed after publication of a polish specialist in the

aeronautic crashes, prof. Binienda (member of an elite team studying the Challenger

crash), who in published research paper, in computer aided simulation, proved that a

birch tree, no matter how big, no matter the velocity and travel angle of the plane,

cannot damage the wing of the plane in any way, endangering the trajectory and integrity

of the flight. No wonder they stay the course, because simple logic dictates, some odd

birch cannot damage any greater engine. You can find in internet dozens of examples of

emergency landings of this type of craft and others in the forest, with the fuselage

largely intact and plane safely landed, wings firmly attached and a swath of cut trees, for

half a mile long behind. The very same type of craft, Tu-154 made at least three such

successful landings in vast russian forests, with minimal damage. How is it possible then,

that ironclad birch downed this plane? You tell me, if you believe it. And do not forget

to prove it.





Autopsies, pathology, forensics

After an accident with victims, no mater where, autopsy is mandatory, it should be

described in detail, with photos and the whole registered on video. Guess what. On this

occasion, wihout precedent, there are only some odd off-the-cuff protocols, non

compatible with real data. Some victim's families now sue the state prosecutor, because

they prove the post-mortem report did not belong to their kin. It is not all. The families

did not take part in identification and placing in the coffins and are not sure, who is

really inside. There is more. The coffins were sent sealed and polish prosecutor's office

ordered the burial without opening of the coffins. How can feel the families, not

knowing who they buried? Only a couple ot the victims were positively identified

through the families, the rest was done through the russian prosecutor's office,

documentation is lacking and nobody seems to have a grip on the procedures. Daughter

of former state attorney Zbigniew Wasserman, a barrister, proved in her father's coffin

lays some other person and got injunction to exhume it. She was correct. There was not

her father buried. Where is he? Who's corpses are buried in the graves of other polish

victims of this memorial flight of april 10th 2010?

IMPORTANT NOTICE

Here is a page with best research, done on internet through volunteers. You will find a

ton of data, research and information. Everybody is welcome, but especially native

english/american or billingual fluent in polish, because most of it is done in this

language. If you can help – choose your favourite material nad pls translate it, we will

publish it together, so the whole world can read about this truly unbelievable story.

http://tori.ils.uec.ac.jp/TORI/index.php/User_talk:Barbara


Related docs
Other docs by Zezowaty Zorro
Faktura, wezwanie do zapłaty
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
Szanowny Panie Baczku
Views: 71  |  Downloads: 0
Pani/Panie Kaziu
Views: 79  |  Downloads: 0
"ekspert" Marek Dąbrowski to Markowski
Views: 110  |  Downloads: 0
Scios to Marasek
Views: 315  |  Downloads: 2
Kotrola lot�w. Sławomir Kozak
Views: 16  |  Downloads: 0
Gini_chamski_trol
Views: 48  |  Downloads: 0
Mail inthecoluds_Macierewicz_MASKIROVKA
Views: 174  |  Downloads: 3
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!