Embed
Email

Office of Vocational and Adult Education; Overview Information; State Scholars Initiative; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2005, CFDA Number 84.051U OVAE

Document Sample
Office of Vocational and Adult Education; Overview Information; State Scholars Initiative; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2005, CFDA Number 84.051U OVAE
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2005 / Notices 45373



DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION recipient, and direct operational involvement dropping out of college increases by 20

in Initiative activities. percent. (American Diploma Project,

Office of Vocational and Adult Project Period: Up to 24 months. 2002). Accordingly, it is important to

Education; Overview Information; the future success of high school

State Scholars Initiative; Notice Full Text of Announcement students that they be motivated and

Inviting Applications for New Awards I. Funding Opportunity Description encouraged to select and complete

for Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 strong academic courses of study.

Purpose of Program: Section 114 of

Under the Initiative, the Assistant

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and

(CFDA) Number: 84.051U.

Secretary seeks to fund a national

Technical Education Act of 1998 (Act),

nonprofit organization or agency that

20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq., authorizes the

DATES: Applications Available: August will fund and provide technical

Secretary to support, among other

5, 2005. Deadline for Transmittal of assistance, monitoring, oversight, and

things, development, dissemination,

Applications: September 6, 2005. cost reimbursements to State-level

evaluation and assessment, capacity

Eligible Applicants: National business-education partnerships that

building, and technical assistance with

nonprofit organizations or agencies will encourage and motivate high school

regard to vocational education to further

that— students to enroll in and complete

the purposes of the Act. The purpose of

(1) Have background and expertise in rigorous courses of study that will

the Initiative is to support a national

the education field and have been in benefit them in their future careers,

nonprofit organization or agency that

existence for at least three years; postsecondary education, or training.

will fund and provide technical

(2) Have worked actively with While the grantee will encourage all

assistance, monitoring, oversight, and

members of the business and education students to pursue a rigorous course of

cost reimbursements to State-level

communities in one or more States, or study, a particular focus of the Initiative

business-education partnerships that

at the national level, in carrying out the is to persuade and motivate vocational

will encourage and motivate high school

nonprofit entity’s core activities; and and technical students to select and

students to enroll in and complete

(3) Have been providing technical complete strong academic courses of

rigorous courses of study that will

assistance to local educational agencies study in high school.

benefit them in their future careers, Anticipated outcomes for

(LEAs), State educational agencies postsecondary education, or training.

(SEAs), secondary schools, educational participating students include increased

institutions, or nonprofit educational Requirements enrollment in rigorous courses of study

organizations or agencies, on Background: The Initiative is and increased enrollment in, and

curriculum or other educational matters. designed to support the goals and completion of, postsecondary education

Estimated Available Funds: objectives of the Act and is fully aligned or additional vocational and technical

$4,800,000 during the 24-month project with the principles and objectives of the education and training after high school.

period. The grant made under this Elementary and Secondary Education Requirements

competition will be made from FY 2004 Act of 1965, as amended by the No

and FY 2005 funds. Required Demonstration of Eligibility:

Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

Estimated Size of Award: $4,800,000. A number of studies indicate that In its application narrative, the

Estimated Number of Awards: 1. rigorous academic course work in high applicant must demonstrate how it

school is essential to future academic meets the eligibility criteria.

Note: The Department is not bound by any

and career success. In fact, studies show Required Program Activities:

estimates in this notice.

that students who lack strong academic Through the Initiative, the Assistant

Note: The yearly operating budget for the preparation tend to face limited career Secretary awards one grant under a

grantee’s administrative and direct program and educational choices and to cooperative agreement to an eligible

activity costs must be approved by the encounter greater difficulty in the applicant that will carry out the

Department and is limited to between workplace and college. (Condition of following activities:

$600,000 and $800,000, except as approved Education 2001, NCES 2001; Credits (a) Support of existing State-level

by the Department. The major portion of the and Attainment: Returns to

grant funds must be used to support contracts

business-education partnerships. The

with State-level business-education

Postsecondary Education Ten Years grantee must review, process, and

partnerships (as defined elsewhere in this After High School, NCES 2001). approve, as appropriate, cost

notice) that the grantee selects to carry out Unfortunately, many high school reimbursements to eligible State-level

the State Scholars Initiative (Initiative) students’ academic preparation is business-education partnerships

activities. inferior. In fact, less than one-third (31 selected by the Center for State Scholars

percent) of all 1995–1996 graduates took and must monitor and provide oversight

Note: Any remaining FY 2003 funds the minimum number of courses to these business-education

currently held by the Center for State recommended for college entrance by

Scholars, the current grantee for the

partnerships.

Initiative, will be transferred to the grantee

the National Commission on Excellence (b) Selection of new State-level

selected under this competition and will be in Education. (High School Academic business-education partnerships. The

used to reimburse existing State-level Curriculum and The Persistence Path grantee must—

business-education partnerships that were Through College, NCES, 2001). For (1) Design, develop, and implement

selected by the Center for State Scholars. example, in the fall of 2000, 28 percent procedures for soliciting proposals from,

of entering freshmen in postsecondary selecting, and awarding contracts for

Note: The Assistant Secretary plans to institutions enrolled in at least one periods of up to 2 years, for a sum of

make an award to the entity selected under remedial course in reading, writing, or up to $300,000 per partnership in total

this competition through a cooperative

agreement. The Assistant Secretary expects

mathematics. (Remedial Education at funding (except as approved by the

the Department’s interaction with the grant Degree-Granting Postsecondary Department) to be allocated during the

recipient to be characterized by continuing Institutions in Fall 2000, NCES, 2004). project to, 8 to 12 new State-level

and regular participation in the project, Unfortunately, for each remedial class a business-education partnerships that are

unusually close collaboration with the grant student takes, his or her chance of able to carry out the Initiative’s





VerDate jul2003 15:34 Aug 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1

45374 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2005 / Notices



activities in the States in which the student data that the grantee requires; under the Initiative and to any and all

business-education partnerships and partnerships that received funding from

operate; (C) Be signed by the district the Center for State Scholars in prior

(2) Evaluate each business-education superintendent and the principals of all years, by offering—

partnership’s proposal for implementing participating schools. (1) Assistance in implementing the

the Initiative activities in its State. In (c) Support of new State-level model created by the grantee;

evaluating each proposal the grantee business-education partnerships. The (2) Methods for identifying barriers to

must consider— grantee must review, process, and implementation of the Initiative

(i) The proposed timeline for approve, as appropriate, cost activities in the State and suggesting

implementation; reimbursements to the State-level solutions to overcome these barriers;

(ii) The proposed methods for business-education partnerships that it (3) Models for sustaining the Initiative

sustaining the Initiative activities after has selected and must monitor and goals and objectives after all available

exhausting Federal funding; provide oversight to these business- Federal contract funds have been

(iii) The administrative capacity of the education partnerships. expended; and

business-education partnership, (d) Implementation model for use by (4) Methods for developing

including personnel qualifications, time State-level business-education partnerships with key stakeholders,

commitments by key personnel, and partnerships. The grantee must such as parents, teachers, guidance

fiscal management; disseminate a model that the State-level counselors, administrators, community

(iv) The degree to which the business- business-education partnerships it groups, and business leaders.

education partnership coherently selects can use to implement Initiative (f) Dissemination. The grantee must

applies the grantee’s implementation activities in the States in which those develop materials and disseminate those

model for the Initiative activities and/or business-education partnerships materials through a wide variety of

improves on the model; and operate. The grantee may use materials media, such as preparing and

(v) The degree to which the business- produced by the Center for State submitting articles for publication in

education partnership identifies its own Scholars to aid in its program activities. magazines, newspapers, and scholarly

State’s needs and customizes the At a minimum, the model must— journals, making presentations at

grantee’s implementation model, as (1) Specify a method for conferences and other events,

appropriate, to address those needs; disseminating to high school students, publishing newsletters, and

(3) Ensure that each business- parents, teachers, administrators, disseminating information through the

education partnership awarded a Internet or other technology. These

professional associations, policymakers,

contract to participate in the project materials must contain the results of

guidance counselors, and business

meets the following criteria: research showing the benefits of

(i) Has played a leadership role or has leaders, in a sustained and

comprehensive way, information about rigorous coursetaking and offer

carried out innovative educational

the importance of rigorous course work examples of how and where the

activities in the State in which it

in high school. The method must tie Initiative activities have been

operates;

(ii) Has not received funding from the into the communication networks that implemented successfully.

exist in the educational arena, in order (g) Communication with State-level

Center for State Scholars and has

to coordinate the message and to avoid business-education partnerships. The

assured the grantee that, if selected, it

duplicating efforts that other grantee must communicate with the

would be the first entity in that State to

organizations have undertaken; State-level business-education

receive Federal financial support under

the Initiative; (2) Provide a comprehensive method partnerships funded by the grantee as

(iii) Has letters of support from the to increase the percentage of students well as those previously funded by the

Chief State School Officer and the who enroll in, and complete, rigorous Center for State Scholars, at least

Governor of the State that— courses, including a method for quarterly to—

(A) Indicate their commitment to maximizing business leaders’ capacity (1) Discuss the progress of

working toward aligning rigorous to affect students’ course enrollment implementation and share promising

courses of study with State and local patterns; practices among the partnerships via

high school graduation requirements; (3) Specify a process for engaging telephone;

(B) Demonstrate a willingness to State policymakers, school district (2) Provide, via telephone, technical

collaborate with the grantee and the administrators, and professional assistance in addressing challenges and

business-education partnership to carry associations in discussions about the identifying strategies for overcoming

out activities under the Initiative; and importance of aligning rigorous course them; and

(C) State a willingness to work to work in high school with high school (3) Provide regular electronic

identify methods and sustainable graduation requirements; communications to and among the

resources for motivating students to (4) Identify techniques, methods, and business-education partnerships to

complete rigorous courses of study; and resources for motivating students to ensure that relevant research, news, and

(iv) Has a letter of commitment to complete a rigorous course of study; other information are shared in a

participate in the Initiative activities (5) Demonstrate a sustainable consistent manner.

from each of at least four school districts approach to funding after Federal funds (h) Evaluation. The grantee must enter

in the State, with each district having at have been expended; and into a contract for an independent third-

least one school with a grade 12 (6) Include timelines, staffing party evaluation of the Initiative

participating in the Initiative activities. patterns, and major activities. activities and the grantee’s

The letter of commitment must— (e) Technical assistance to State-level administration of the Initiative. The

(A) State in writing that the school business-education partnerships. The grantee must submit a yearly evaluation

district and participating school(s) have grantee must provide technical report that contains information about

the data systems in place to collect and assistance to State-level business- the measures listed in this paragraph

track the data required by the grantee; education partnerships with which the (h), along with data on the performance

(B) Commit to providing the grantee grantee enters into contracts and to measures indicated in the Performance

with any and all non-identifiable which it provides reimbursements Measures section of this notice. In





VerDate jul2003 15:34 Aug 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2005 / Notices 45375



addition to information describing the evaluation report that addresses the Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking:

grantee’s progress on the performance requirements in paragraph (h) in this Under the Administrative Procedure Act

measures, the evaluation must also section. (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department

include the following: (k) Submission of Final Report. The generally offers interested parties the

(1) The use of existing data sources, grantee must submit to the Department, opportunity to comment on proposed

or the establishment of new data sources within three months of the conclusion program requirements, definitions, and

or systems, to ascertain, at a minimum: of the project period, a final report selection criteria. Section 437(d)(2) of

(A) Course enrollment data, that— the General Education Provisions Act

including, but not limited to, the (1) Outlines the activities and (20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(2)), however, allows

percentage of students in participating accomplishments of the grantee and all the Secretary to exempt from

schools, districts, and States completing the business-education partnerships rulemaking requirements, regulations

the entire rigorous course of study and selected by the Center for State Scholars where the Secretary determines that

the percentage of students completing and by the grantee; conducting rulemaking will cause

each class that is a component of the (2) Provides information about the extreme hardship to the intended

rigorous course of study, disaggregated promising practices developed through beneficiaries of the program affected by

by race and ethnicity, family income the project that were carried out by the the regulations.

level, limited English proficiency, grantee and by all the business- The Secretary has determined that

gender, and disability. education partnerships selected by the conducting rulemaking for this

(B) The impact of the Initiative on Center for State Scholars and by the

competition under the Initiative would

student, teacher, guidance counselor, grantee;

cause extreme hardship to the

and parent attitudes, perceptions, and (3) Includes the findings of the

independent third-party evaluation; and beneficiaries of this program. Under a

beliefs about the importance of rigorous cooperative agreement with the

course taking and its effect on (4) Reports on the performance

measures described in the Performance Department, the current grantee under

postsecondary and occupational the Initiative, the Center for State

outcomes. Measures section of this notice.

Scholars, has provided technical

(2) An assessment of promising Definitions:

assistance, oversight, monitoring

practices for implementing the Initiative In addition to the definitions support, and cost reimbursements to 14

activities in all the business-education contained in the Act and the applicable State-level business-education

partnerships selected by the Center for sections of the Education Department partnerships for a multi-year period. On

State Scholars and by the grantee. General Administrative Regulations June 21, 2005, however, the Center for

(3) An analysis of the grantee’s (EDGAR), the following definitions also

State Scholars notified the Department

effectiveness in serving as a technical apply to this Initiative and competition:

that it did not intend to continue as

assistance provider to all the business- The term rigorous course of study,

rigorous course taking, rigorous Initiative grantee and would be

education partnerships selected by the terminating its activities under the

Center for State Scholars and by the coursework, or strong academic course

of study means course work which, at a cooperative agreement on September 30,

grantee. 2005.

(4) An implementation study minimum, consists of the following:

comparing the manner in which the four credits of English, three credits of The Department has not yet awarded

Initiative was carried out in all the math (Algebra I, geometry, and Algebra FY 2004 or 2005 Initiative funds. Unless

business-education partnerships II), three credits of basic lab science a new grantee is selected and awarded

selected by the Center for State Scholars (biology, chemistry, and physics), three an Initiative grant by September 30,

and by the grantee. and one-half credits of social studies 2005, FY 2004 funds for the Initiative

(i) Submission of Interim Reports. The (chosen from U.S. and world history, will lapse and will no longer be

grantee must submit a progress report to geography, economics, and available for obligation by the

the Department within 15 days of the government), and two credits of the Department. To conduct rulemaking at

end of each project quarter (except for same language other than English. this time would not allow us to make an

the final project quarter in which a final The term State-level business- award of FY 2004 funds by September

report must be submitted as described education partnership or business- 30, 2005. The lapsing of FY 2004 funds

in paragraph (k) in this section) that— education partnership means an entity would cause extreme hardship to the 14

(1) Provides an update on the that leads or implements educational current State business-education

completion of project goals and initiatives throughout the State and partnerships providing services under

activities by the grantee and by all the whose members include individuals the Initiative, to future partnerships yet

business-education partnerships from the education and business to be selected, and overall to all

selected by the Center for State Scholars communities. intended Initiative beneficiaries.

and by the grantee; The term grantee or grant recipient Without such funds, the partnership

(2) Outlines any major challenges to means the national nonprofit programs currently in operation could

achieving project goals and the grantee’s organization or agency that is selected cease, and students would not receive

strategies for addressing these and receives a Federal grant from the future services under the Initiative from

challenges; Department under this competition and new business-education partnerships.

(3) Describes any major changes in the utilizes that grant for allowable Furthermore, in order to provide for

project activities; and purposes under the terms of a continuity of effective program services

(4) Gives a financial report about cooperative agreement between the under the Initiative, the Secretary

expenditures per budget category and grantee and the Department. believes that a grant award for at least

links the Initiative goals to the The term national nonprofit a two-year period is necessary and that

expenditures. organization or agency does not include an award of only FY 2004 funds at this

(j) Submission of Annual Evaluation SEAs, LEAs, or institutions of higher time would cause substantial harm to

Report. The grantee must submit to the education, as defined in section 101 of program beneficiaries. The

Department, within 15 days of the the Higher Education Act of 1965, as requirements, definitions, and selection

conclusion of each project year, an amended. criteria established in this notice will





VerDate jul2003 15:34 Aug 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1

45376 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2005 / Notices



apply to this grant competition for FY 2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This or hand delivery. For information

2004 and FY 2005 funds only. competition does not involve cost (including dates and times) about how

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. sharing or matching. to submit your application by mail or

2324(c)(6)(A). hand delivery, please refer to section IV.

IV. Application and Submission

Applicable Regulations: EDGAR in 34 6. Other Submission Requirements in

Information

CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, this notice.

97, 98, and 99. 1. Address To Request Application We do not consider an application

Package: Rebecca Arnold, U.S. that does not comply with the deadline

II. Award Information Department of Education, 400 Maryland requirements.

Type of Award: Cooperative Ave., SW., Potomac Center Plaza, room 4. Intergovernmental Review: This

agreement. 11115, Washington, DC 20202–7241. competition is subject to Executive

Estimated Available Funds: Telephone: (202) 245–7744 or by e-mail: Order 12372 and the regulations in 34

$4,800,000 during the 24-month project Rebecca.Arnold@ed.gov. CFR part 79.

period. The grant made under this If you use a telecommunications 5. Funding Restrictions: We reference

competition will be made from FY 2004 device for the deaf (TDD), you may call regulations outlining funding

and FY 2005 funds. the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1– restrictions in the Applicable

800–877–8339. Regulations section of this notice.

Estimated Size of Award: $4,800,000.

You may also obtain an application 6. Other Submission Requirements:

Estimated Number of Awards: 1. package via the Internet at the following Applications for grants under this

Note: The Department is not bound by any address: http://www.ed.gov/about/ competition must be submitted in paper

estimates in this notice. offices/list/ovae/pi/hs/factsh/ssi.html. format by mail or hand delivery.

Individuals with disabilities may a. Submission of Applications by

Note: The yearly operating budget for the obtain a copy of the application package Mail.

grantee’s administrative and direct program in an alternative format (e.g., Braille, If you submit your application by

activity costs must be approved by the mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or

Department and is limited to between

large print, audiotape, or computer

$600,000 and $800,000, except as approved diskette) by contacting the program a commercial carrier), you must mail the

by the Department. The major portion of the contact person listed in this section. original and two copies of your

grant funds must be used to support contracts 2. Content and Form of Application application, on or before the application

with State-level business-education Submission: Requirements concerning deadline date, to the Department at the

partnerships that the grantee selects to carry the content of an application, together applicable following address:

out the Initiative activities. with the forms you must submit, are in By mail through the U.S. Postal

the application package for this Service: U.S. Department of Education,

Note: Any remaining FY 2003 funds competition. Application Control Center, Attention:

currently held by the Center for State

Page Limit: The application narrative (CFDA Number 84.051U), 400 Maryland

Scholars will be transferred to the grantee

selected under this competition and will be (Part III of the application) is where you, Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202–

used to reimburse existing State-level the applicant, address the selection 4260.

business-education partnerships that were criteria that reviewers use to evaluate or

selected by the Center for State Scholars. your application. You are strongly By mail through a commercial carrier:

encouraged to limit Part III to the U.S. Department of Education,

Note: The Assistant Secretary plans to equivalent of no more than 35 pages, Application Control Center—Stop 4260,

make an award to the entity selected under using the following standards: Attention: (CFDA Number 84.051U),

this competition through a cooperative • A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ × 11″, on one side 7100 Old Landover Road, Landover, MD

agreement. The Assistant Secretary expects

only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom, 20785–1506.

the Department’s interaction with the grant

recipient to be characterized by continuing and both sides. Regardless of the address you use, you

and regular participation in the project, • Double space (no more than three must show proof of mailing consisting

unusually close collaboration with the grant lines per vertical inch) all text in the of one of the following:

recipient, and direct operational involvement application narrative, including titles, (1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service

in Initiative activities. headings, footnotes, quotations, postmark, (2) A legible mail receipt with

references, and captions, as well as all the date of mailing stamped by the U.S.

Project Period: Up to 24 months. text in charts, tables, figures, and Postal Service, (3) A dated shipping

III. Eligibility Information graphs. label, invoice, or receipt from a

• Use a font that is either 12 point or commercial carrier, or

1. Eligible Applicants: National larger or no smaller than 10 pitch (4) Any other proof of mailing

nonprofit organizations or agencies (characters per inch). acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.

that— The recommended page limit does not Department of Education.

(i) Have background and expertise in apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II, If you mail your application through

the education field and have been in the budget section, including the the U.S. Postal Service, we do not

existence for at least three years; narrative budget justification; Part IV, accept either of the following as proof

(ii) Have worked actively with the assurances and certifications; or the of mailing:

members of the business and education one-page abstract, the resumes, the (1) A private metered postmark, or

communities in one or more States, or bibliography, or the letters of support. (2) A mail receipt that is not dated by

at the national level, in carrying out the However, you must include all of the the U.S. Postal Service.

nonprofit entity’s core activities; and application narrative in Part III. If your application is postmarked after

(iii) Have been providing technical 3. Submission Dates and Times: the application deadline date, we will

assistance to LEAs, SEAs, secondary Applications Available: August 5, 2005. not consider your application.

schools, educational institutions, or Deadline for Transmittal of Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not

nonprofit educational organizations or Applications: September 6, 2005. uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before

agencies, on curriculum or other Applications for grants under this relying on this method, you should check

educational matters. competition must be submitted by mail with your local post office.







VerDate jul2003 15:34 Aug 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2005 / Notices 45377



b. Submission of Applications by a plan that comprehensively addresses evaluation plan of the proposed project,

Hand Delivery. each of the following required program the Assistant Secretary considers the

If you submit your application by activities: extent to which the applicant’s

hand delivery, you (or a courier service) (i) The technical assistance activities evaluation plan conforms to the

must deliver the original and two copies outlined in paragraph (e) of the program requirements in paragraph (h)

of your application, by hand, on or Requirements section of this notice. of the Requirements section of this

before the application deadline date, to (ii) The dissemination activities notice.

the Department at the following address: outlined in paragraph (f) of the

Requirements section of this notice. VI. Award Administration Information

U.S. Department of Education,

Application Control Center, Attention: (iii) The communication activities 1. Award Notices: If your application

(CFDA Number 84.051U), 550 12th outlined in paragraph (g) of the is successful, we notify your U.S.

Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center Requirements section of this notice. Representative and U.S. Senators and

Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–4260. (3) Improvements (5 points). The send you a Grant Award Notification

The Application Control Center extent to which the applicant— (GAN). We may also notify you

accepts hand deliveries daily between 8 (i) Identifies additional activities, informally.

a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC beyond the required program activities, If your application is not evaluated or

time, except Saturdays, Sundays, and that enhance the program’s design; and not selected for funding, we notify you.

(ii) Describes any anticipated 2. Administrative and National Policy

Federal holidays.

Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of problems and recommends solutions for Requirements: We identify

Paper Applications: If you mail or hand those problems. administrative and national policy

(4) Business-education Partnership requirements in the application package

deliver your application to the

Contracts (10 points). The extent to and reference these and other

Department:

(1) You must indicate on the envelope which the applicant presents a thorough requirements in the Applicable

and—if not provided by the and objective application process for Regulations section of this notice.

business-education partnerships seeking We reference the regulations outlining

Department—in Item 4 of the ED 424 the

funding to implement the program in the terms and conditions of an award in

CFDA number—and suffix letter, if

their State, which meets all of the the Applicable Regulations section of

any—of the competition under which

requirements outlined in paragraph (b) this notice and include these and other

you are submitting your application.

(2) The Application Control Center of the Requirements section of this specific conditions in the GAN. The

will mail a grant application receipt notice. GAN also incorporates your approved

(b) Management Plan (35 points). The application as part of your binding

acknowledgment to you. If you do not

Assistant Secretary considers the quality commitments under the grant.

receive the grant application receipt

of the management plan of the proposed 3. Reporting: At the end of your

acknowledgment within 15 business project. In determining the quality of the

days from the application deadline date, project period, you must submit a final

management plan of the proposed performance report, including financial

you should call the U.S. Department of project, the Assistant Secretary

Education Application Control Center at information, as directed by the Assistant

considers the following: Secretary. If you receive a multi-year

(202) 245–6288. (1) Description of Plan (15 points). award, you must submit an annual

V. Application Review Information The extent to which the applicant performance report that provides the

includes a description, in a clear and

Selection Criteria: The Department most current performance and financial

sequential fashion, of the plan for

will apply the following selection expenditure information as specified in

managing the project.

criteria in evaluating applications under (2) Budget (5 points). The extent to 34 CFR 75.118.

this competition. The maximum total 4. Performance Measures: The grantee

which the budget proposes an

score any applicant may receive is 100 must collect data, and report annually to

appropriate distribution of available

points. The maximum score for each the Department, on the following

Federal resources to carry out the listed

criterion is indicated in parentheses. performance measures to measure the

program requirements and a sound,

(a) Technical Approach (45 points). effectiveness of the Initiative:

well-developed financial management (i) The number and percentage of

The Assistant Secretary considers the system.

quality of the technical approach of the students in participating schools,

(3) Key Personnel (5 points). The

proposed project. In determining the districts, and States who have four-year

extent to which key personnel have—

quality of the technical approach of the (i) Clearly defined responsibilities; high school course enrollment plans

proposed project, the Assistant (ii) An appropriate amount of time that include the Initiative’s rigorous

Secretary considers the following: committed to the project; and course of study. If four-year high school

(1) Implementation Model (15 points). (iii) Clearly identified and course enrollment plans do not exist in

The extent to which the applicant documented qualifications, a participating school, then the number

presents an outline of a model that competencies, and experiences that are and percentage of students who have a

State-level business-education appropriate for the tasks to be carried one-or two-year high school course

partnerships can use to implement out under this Initiative. enrollment plan that includes

Initiative activities in the States in (4) Experience (10 points). The extent components of the rigorous course of

which the business-education to which the applicant demonstrates its study.

partnerships operate and that— overall administrative experience and (ii) The availability of classes that

(i) Comprehensively addresses the capacity to carry out the Initiative, comprise the rigorous course of study in

criteria outlined in paragraph (d) of the including a demonstration of its participating schools, districts, and

Requirements section of this notice; and experience in leading or implementing States.

(ii) Is feasible for implementation by educational initiatives and managing VII. Agency Contact

State-level business-education Federal, State, local, or private

partnerships. education grants. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

(2) Program Activities (15 points). The (c) Evaluation (20 points). In Rebecca Arnold, U.S. Department of

extent to which the applicant presents determining the quality of the Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW.,





VerDate jul2003 15:34 Aug 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1

45378 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 150 / Friday, August 5, 2005 / Notices



Potomac Center Plaza, room 11115, programs with low entrance Preparation Models’’ in the subject line

Washington, DC 20202–7241. requirements—5 of which also have of the electronic message.

Telephone: (202) 245–7744 or by e-mail: minimal course requirements and 5 of During and after the comment period,

Rebecca.Arnold@ed.gov. which also have substantial course you may inspect all comments about

If you use a telecommunications requirements. To identify the 10 this notice in room 310, 555 New Jersey

device for the deaf (TDD), you may call programs, the contractor selected from Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, between

the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1– 165 programs in 12 states with low the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,

800–877–8339. entrance selectivity requirements. The Eastern time, Monday through Friday of

Individuals with disabilities may study sample consists of teachers in each week except Federal holidays.

obtain this document in an alternative districts and schools where there is both

format (e.g., Braille, large print, Assistance to Individuals With

an alternatively certified teacher and a

audiotape, or computer diskette) on Disabilities in Reviewing the

traditionally certified teacher with

request to the program contact person Rulemaking Record

similar amounts of prior teaching

listed in this section. experience who teach in the same grade. On request, we will supply an

A pair of new teachers in the same grade appropriate aid, such as a reader or

VIII. Other Information

was formed at each of 80 schools print magnifier, to an individual with a

Electronic Access to This Document: included in the study, with 1 teacher disability who needs assistance to

You may view this document, as well as having taken the traditional route and 1 review the comments or other

all other documents of this Department the alternative route to certification. documents in the public rulemaking

published in the Federal Register, in The system includes the teachers’ record for this notice. If you want to

text or Adobe Portable Document social security numbers; the teachers’ schedule an appointment for this type of

Format (PDF) on the Internet at the demographic information—such as race/ aid, please contact the person listed

following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ ethnicity, age, and educational under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

fedregister. background; information from two CONTACT.

To use PDF you must have Adobe classroom observations; and the results

Acrobat Reader, which is available free FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.

of the teachers’ standardized test scores Ricky Takai. Telephone: (202) 208–

at this site. If you have questions about (e.g., existing SAT or ACT scores) as

using PDF, call the U.S. Government 7083. If you use a telecommunications

well as their students’ standardized test device for the deaf (TDD), you may call

Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1– scores. The Department seeks comment

888–293–6498; or in the Washington, the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–

on this new system of records described 800–877–8339.

DC, area at (202) 512–1530. in this notice, in accordance with the Individuals with disabilities may

Note: The official version of this document requirements of the Privacy Act. obtain this document in an alternative

is the document published in the Federal DATES: We must receive your comments format (e.g., Braille, large print,

Register. Free Internet access to the official on the proposed routine uses for the audiotape, or computer diskette) on

edition of the Federal Register and the Code

system of records described in this request to the contact person listed

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO

Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ notice on or before September 6, 2005. under this section.

index.html. The Department filed a report SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

describing the new system of records

Dated: August 3, 2005. covered by this notice with the Chair of Introduction

Susan Sclafani, the Senate Committee on Homeland The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a)

Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Security and Governmental Affairs, the requires the Department to publish in

Education. Chair of the House Committee on the Federal Register this notice of a new

[FR Doc. 05–15632 Filed 8–4–05; 8:45 am] Government Reform, and the system of records maintained by the

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P Administrator of the Office of Department. The Department’s

Information and Regulatory Affairs, regulations implementing the Privacy

Office of Management and Budget Act are contained in part 5b of title 34

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (OMB) on August 2, 2005. This system of the Code of Federal Regulations

of records will become effective at the (CFR).

Privacy Act of 1974; System of later date of: (1) The expiration of the 40 The Privacy Act applies to

Records—Impact Evaluation of day period for OMB review on information about individuals that

Teacher Preparation Models September 12, 2005 or (2) September 6, contains individually identifiable

AGENCY: Institute of Education Sciences, 2005, unless the system of records needs information that is retrieved by a unique

Department of Education. to be changed as a result of public identifier associated with each

comment or OMB review. individual, such as a name or social

ACTION: Notice of a new system of

records. ADDRESSES: Address all comments about security number. The information about

the proposed routine uses to Dr. Ricky each individual is called a ‘‘record,’’

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Takai, Associate Commissioner, and the system, whether manual or

Privacy Act of 1974, as amended Evaluation Division, National Center for computer-based, is called a ‘‘system of

(Privacy Act), the Department of Education Evaluation and Regional records.’’ The Privacy Act requires each

Education (Department) publishes this Assistance, Institute of Education agency to publish notices of new or

notice of a new system of records Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, altered systems of records in the Federal

entitled Impact Evaluation of Teacher 555 New Jersey Avenue, NW., room Register and to submit reports to the

Preparation Models (18–13–10). The 502D, Washington, DC 20208–0001. Administrator of the Office of

system contains information about Telephone: (202) 208–7083. If you Information and Regulatory Affairs,

teachers from selected teacher prefer to send comments through the OMB, the Chair of the Senate Committee

preparation programs and their Internet, use the following address: on Homeland Security and

students. The selected teacher comments@ed.gov. You must include Governmental Affairs, and the Chair of

preparation programs are a sample of 10 the term ‘‘Impact Evaluation of Teacher the House Committee on Government





VerDate jul2003 15:34 Aug 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1


Other docs by DeptEdu
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!