3GPP TSG_CN_WG4, Meeting #07 Tdoc N4-010422
Sophia Antipolis, FRANCE, 26th February - 2nd March 2001
Source: 3GPP CN4 CHAIRMAN
Title: TDOC ALLOCATION
Agenda item: 2
Document for: APPROVAL
Tdoc Allocation updated till 25 Nov 2011 1:38 (CET)
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
1 Opening, approval of 0321 Agenda Ad Hoc Convenor 1. Approved
agenda
2 Document Allocation 0322 Tdoc allocation Ad Hoc Convenor 2. -> T-doc 422
3 Meeting Report 0324 CN4#06 Meeting Report - Beijing MCC 3. Approved
0323 CN4#06_01 Ad Hoc Meeting Report - Madrid MCC 4. Approved
0325 New Meeting Templates for CN groups MCC 5.
4 Liaison Statements 0326 LS on Problem with GPRS and Roaming (N4- N1 6. Section 9.1 Noted
010214)
0418 Reply to LS on Multiparty issues S1 7. Noted
0419 Response to Tdoc NJ-010107 (Control of IP S1 8. Noted
Multi Media services) probably to be discussed in joint meeting
0420 Removal of Visited Control S-CSCF option S2 9. Noted.
from Release 5 IPMM Architecture Nortel: Is this to be removed for Rel6? -> no idea
Vodafone: the Cx interface should be an open interface to allow
multivendor.
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0421 LS on replacement of 23.121 for R4 onwards S2 10. We should check if there’s any reference to be changed
Motorola -> title of TS is Release 5, but we should refer to it
from release 4 docs =>> inconsistency
Vodafone -> intention is to remove details on release 5 from TS
so title is wrong.
5 Work Item Management 0349 3GPP workplan CN4 Chairman 11. To be studied and commented. On hold
0350 Work Item Description for Release 5: Motorola 12. YunChao ->Third point to be removed, since we should talk
"Feasibility study on SS7 signalling about technical solution.
transportation in the core network with SCCP- Vodafone -> at least some sketch of technical solutions should be
User Adaptation (SUA)”
provided to assess the possibloe problems.
F.Telecom -> is there time enough for release 5? Feasibility to be
approved in plenary 12 in June => there are only three CN
meetings (July, October, November) to complete the
standardization work for release 5. TR Draft must be presented
and approved by CN4 in May if it has to go to plenary 12.
Vodafone -> output should be a Technical Report containing a
recommendation go/nogo for the plenary to decide. This
feasibility study should not produce a CR against 29.202
France Telecom-> impacts on services to be considered: NP
CCBS
Vodafone-> security aspect none => wrong !! it should be
analyzed if IP-SEC instead of MAP security can be used.
Yun-Chao -> need for two more supporting companies to be
found for the plenary else WI will be rejected.
0424 Work Item Description for Release 5: Motorola 13. 350 modified => Agreed without presentation
"Feasibility study on SS7 signalling
transportation in the core network with SCCP-
User Adaptation (SUA)”
0376 Work Item Description for Bearer Independent Rapporteur 14. forwarded to CN3-CN4 meeting. Already reviewed in Madrid
Circuit-Switched Core Network
6 Release 4 (Yun-Chao)
6.1 Location Services 0334 CR 29.002 – 233 Rev 2 (Rel4) on MS NTC 15. Approved like this since we base on the current information on
presence notification procedure sa2 status. If SA2 changes their mind then they will have to do
the cleanup.
0338 CR 29.002 - 240 (Rel-4) on CR to 29.002 on Siemens 16. To be further investigated.
Clarification on the use of IMSI in
ProvideSubscriberLocationArg
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0375 CR 29.002 - 232 Rev 1 (R4) on Maximum NTC 17. postponed until 0462 is ready showing the calculation of max nbr
numbers of LCS Clients lcs clients
0462 Calculation of maximum numbers of LCS NTC 18.
Clients
6.2 Network Security 0330 CR 23.012 - 007 (Rel4) on Positive Vodafone 19. Approved according to CN4 except if SA3 brings an LS to stop
authentication reporting it. Another impacted spec (new on CR 33.102 needed)
Withdrawn because SA3 doesn’t have a clear view and has
postponed positive authentication to release 5
0331 CR 23.018 - 066 (Rel4) on Positive Vodafone 20. A number of changes to done 0463
authentication reporting
0463 Revised 0331 Vodafone 21. Withdrawn because SA3 doesn’t have a clear view
0332 CR 29.002 - 235 (Rel4) on Positive Vodafone 22. Revised to Tdoc N4-010348
authentication reporting
0333 CR 29.002 - 236 (Rel4) on Requesting node Vodafone 23. Changes needed in asn.1 notation to show that some parameters
type and address in authentication set request are optional
0465 Revised 0333 Vodafone 24. To be seen
0337 CR 29.002 - 168 Rev 2 (Rel4) on Security Siemens 25. Only reference to be added to ???? + change cover sheet because
Header modification of wrong form used.
Put on hold to wait for the LS response from SA3
0466 Revised 0337 Siemens 26.
0348 CR 29.002 – 235 Rev 1 (Rel4) on Positive Vodafone 27. Potential impacts discovered on the GLR stage 2/3 specs.23.117
authentication reporting 29.119 Need to investigate and make cr’s. To be discussed with
SA3 now timeframes and possibility to get this into release 4
still.
Vodafone + Yun-Chao CN4 might propose to accept a partial
package without GLR if the companies not needing GLR agree.
CR’s will be prepared by our japanese lady Sujima-san to be
presented in May.
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
Editorial changes to 23.205 (v1.2.0) Ericsson L.M. 28. Presented by Ian Park (Vodafone)
0471
Kevin (Nortel) comment Initial Address Message changed to
IAM but he thinks it is less clear since it hints to C7 signalling.
Elena (Ericsson) reminds that it was agreed that messages can
have ISUP names. Alf (Ericsson) comments that IAM is
tup/isup/bicc.
Comment rejected
Ian (Vodafone) watch out that still some editorials might
have slipped in. He asks rapporteur to just correct editorials if she
spots any. Meeting agrees
Chairman Meeting agrees to delete references 8, 9, 10 and
any reference to SIP-T in the document? Yes
Document approved, no new T-doc necessary as there only
straighforward changes that rapporteur will do in TS directly.
0464 Revised 0348 Vodafone 29. Withdrawn because SA3 doesn’t have a clear view
6.3 Bearer Independent
Architecture
6.3.1 Stage 2 0377 23.205 Editor's version including agreed Rapporteur 30.
contributions in CN4 Ad Hoc
0379 Modifications to TS 23.205 version 1.2.0 Ericsson L.M. 31. presented by Peka (??) (Ericsson)
Ian (Vodafone) comment on punctuation of Through-
Connection. Sometimes there’s a space between Trough and
Connection. Edzo (Lucent) points out another editorial “requests
without the s”
Document approved
0380 Modification of section 8 (Handover) Ericsson L.M. 32. presented by Peka (??) (Ericsson)
Document approved without comments
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0381 Enhancements to service modification Ericsson L.M. 33. presented by Peka (??) (Ericsson)
John (Lucent) 16.2.42 where is the associated message ??
msword played some trick on John…. Question withdrawn
Document approved with no comments
0382 Alignment of Tunnelling with ITU-T last Ericsson L.M. Withdrawn
changes in Gold Coast BICC editor's meeting
0406 Editorial updates on 23.205v1.2.0 to be Rapporteur 34. 0438
aligned with BICC CS2 last version issued in
Gold Coast meeting
0438 Editorial updates on 23.205v1.2.0 to be Rapporteur 35. 0473
aligned with BICC CS2 last version issued in
Gold Coast meeting
0473 Editorial updates on 23.205v1.2.0 to be Rapporteur 36. approved
aligned with BICC CS2 last version issued in
Gold Coast meeting
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0407 23.205, Multiparty alternative Nortel Networks 37. presented by Kevin (Nortel)
John (Lucent) is this introducing a second implementation of
MultyParty??
Yun-Chao: why does Nortel wants to introduce this?? Kevin
(Nortel) replies that the new implementation is done using
existing messaging with no impact .
Peka (Ericsson): why changing the normative part? Answer
Kevin: it’s all informative.
John (Lucent) there comes inconsistency between normative and
informative sections; Kevin: no because it’s all informative.
Ericsson: remove the examples since they could be vendor
implementation specific. John (Lucent) if it does not matter the
vendor implementation then remove it from standards.
Yun-Chao: Meeting feels that procedure described before the
example should only be one.
John (Lucent) if this new procedure brings saving in signalling
and complexity then it should be extimated how much and if it’s
enough then the new procedure should just replace the old one,
not be an option.
Edzo (Lucent) why is signalling in Handover increased? Alf and
Peka reply (??).
Consensus that MGW must be able to respond to H.248
commands, so the server can implement the service as it wants.
This means that the text from 13.7.2 to the example should be
normative and example and charts are informative reaction
(Ericsson and Lucent) that this means two normative ways of
implementing MultiParty. This is not acceptable. There should be
only one clause for Multiparty and maybe more example of
implementation in the informative section of the clause.
John (Lucent): Current text does not prevent Nortel to implement
multiparty with single context.
For now the example can be added to Multiparty clause, and
Nortel will propose generic text (if not generic enough) for clause
13.7
document revised to 476
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0400 TS 23.205 v1.2.0, Corrections Nortel Networks 38. presented by Kevin (Nortel)
Elena (Ericsson) why not using the last version of the
23.205? because now changes are not really easy to spot into the
figure 17.2. Kevin to help Elena to spot the changes. .
Peka (Ericsson) the prepare bearer procedure has two
optional parameter that should be mandatory if non tunnelling is
used. These parameters should then be conditional.
Elena asks for a text proposal to Kevin: “these information
elements shall not be included if bearer information tunnelling is
done
Alf says that the MGW might always decide not to use tunnelling
; the MSC Server knows only if tunnelling might be used by the
MGW, so parameters should be Mandatory.
Decision: these parameter must be mandatory
Document approved with 1 comment.
0402 TS 23.205v1.2.0, (G)MSC Gateway Nortel Networks 39. presented by Kevin (Nortel)
Tandeming
Ian (Vodafone) replace Gateway Tandeming with Media
Gateway . Cooment accepted
Alf (Ericsson) can the MGS be controlled by more than one
server? YES
Alf (Ericsson) when is the ACM sent? It should be decided
by MSC Server A. Some changes to introductory text of figure
18.2
“…In the example, after the signalling towards MSC server
A and then bearer towards the MGW B is established,
MSC server A requests …..” text agreed
Document approved with above change.
6.3.2 Stage 3 - Nc interface 0378 29.205 Editor's version including agreed Rapporteur 40. Noted
contributions in CN4 Ad Hoc
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0387 Updates of TS 29.205 version 1.20 Ericsson L.M. 41. Presented by Alf (Ericsson)
Ian (Vodafone) two clauses 4.4. Agreed
Document approved. And TS 29.205 is also approved in version
2.0.0
6.3.3 Stage 3 - Mc interface 0383 Updates of TS 29.232 version 1.2.0 Ericsson L.M. 42. Withdrawn
0384 Additions to the CSD package Ericsson L.M. 43. Approved
0385 Corrections To Modify Char Procedure Ericsson L.M. 44. Replaced by 0472
0472 Corrections To Bearer Modification Ericsson L.M. 45. Approved
Procedure
0386 Enhancements to service modification Ericsson L.M. 46. Withdrawn, is addressed by 0384
0401 TS 29.232v1.2.0, Mc interface Nortel Networks 47. Approved onòly for some parts. New text encoding removed.
clarifications/improvements Yun-Chao to say in his status report that there are problems open
for text encoding, and that Ericsson objects requiring a note in
the TS saying that. No consensus on whether text encoding is
necessary or not.
0416 Editorial updates on 29.232 Rapporteur 48. Noted. Small editorials needed: reference to RFC on SIP-T to be
removeed. Reference to releaqse 2000 to be changed.
6.4 Supplementary Services
6.4.1 Call Waiting 0357 CR 23.018 - 067 (R4) on Removal of CW Vodafone 49.
descriptions
0358 CR 23.083 - 007 (R4) on Enhancement of Vodafone 50.
CW procedures
6.4.2 MPTY and ECT 0355 CR 23.018 - 065 Rev 1 (R4) on Incorporation Vodafone 51.
of MPTY and ECT into the Subs_FSM
process.
6.4.3 Call Hold 0356 CR 23.083 - 006 Rev 1 (R4) on Enhancement Vodafone 52.
of procedures for Call Hold
0426 Revised 0356 53.
0415 Editorial updates on 29.202 Rapporteur 54.
6.5 IP Signalling
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0425 Editorial updates of 415 Rapporteur 55. Some editorials in Annex A. Wrong template used.
7 Release 5 (Yun-Chao)
7.1. HSS-CSCF i/f 0363 Cx interface protocol selection Siemens 56.
0373 Capability negotiation in DIAMETER Ericsson 57.
0423 from SA2 Reply LS on the Work Item “Cx Ericsson 58. tCN4 will work on the detailed information flows. And on two
Interface specification” documents that are going to be generated: stage2 23.cde, stage3
29.cde
8 Release 99 (Teemu)
8.1 CAMEL Phase 3 0335 CR 29.002 – 237 (Rel-4) on CR to 29.002 on Siemens 59. Withdrawn
SS-CSI editing error correction from CR 115r1
0336 CR 29.002 – 238 (R99) on CR to 29.002 on Siemens 60. Withdrawn
SS-CSI editing error correction from CR 115r1
0360 CR 29.002 – 246 (Rel-4) on Adding EXPORT Ericsson 61.
definition for LSAIdentity
0361 CR 29.002 – 247 (Rel-4) on Removing Ericsson 62.
duplicate parameters from SS-CSI
0362 CR 29.002 – 248 (Rel-4) on Correction to Ericsson 63.
description of SS-CSI in HLR to VLR
information flow
0427 CR 29.002 Adding EXPORT definition for Nokia 64. Approved
GeographicalInformation
0428 CR 29.002 Adding EXPORT definition for Nokia 65. Approved
GeographicalInformation
0469 Cr 261 Correction to D-CSI Alcatel 66.
0470 Cr 261 Correction to D-CSI Alcatel 67.
8.2 Security 0340 CR 29.002 – 225 Rev 1 (R99) on Addition of Nokia 68.
selected UMTS algorithm indication to the
handover procedures
0429 340 revised 69. agreed by consensus category to be presented
Approved
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0341 CR 29.002 - 226 Rev 1 (R99) on Addition of Nokia 70. change in wording of reference to gsm 08.08
allowed GSM algorithms indication to the
handover procedures
0434 Revised 0341 71. agreed with no presentation
0342 CR 29.002 – 238 (Rel-4) on Addition of Nokia 72. mirror cr of 343
selected UMTS algorithm indication to the
handover procedures
0430 Revised 0342 73. to be presented
0343 CR 29.002 – 241 (Rel-4) on Addition of Nokia 74.
allowed GSM algorithms indication to the
handover procedures
0431 Revised 0343 75. approved
0344 CR 29.002 – 242 (R99) on Addition of allowed Nokia 76. categorized as Essential correction
UMTS algorithms indication to the handover
procedures
0432 Revised 344 Nokia 77. to be seen again Approved
0345 CR 29.002 – 243 (R99) on Addition of Nokia 78. categorized as “agreed by consensus”. Change in 7.6 as for 0341
selected GSM algorithm indication to the
handover procedures
0435 Revised 0345 79. approved with no further presentation
0346 CR 29.002 – 244 (Rel-4) on Addition of Nokia 80.
allowed UMTS algorithms indication to the
handover procedures
0433 Revised 346 Nokia 81. to be seen again Approved
0347 CR 29.002 - 245 (Rel-4) on Addition of Nokia 82. mirror of 345. Plus change reference to 08.08 to 48.008
selected GSM algorithm indication to the
handover procedures
0436 Revised 0347 83. approved with no further presentation
8.3 GPRS 0339 CR 29.060 - 155 Rev 3 (R99) on Adding Up- Nokia 84.
link TEID Data I and user plane GGSN
address to PDP Context IE
0351 CR 29.060 - 179 Rev 1 on Clarifications to the Motorola 85.
GTP-U protocol
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0359 CR 29.060 - 181 (R99) on Fix an ambiguous NEC 86.
description on the treatment for the PDP Type
PPP in PDP context creation procedure
0372 CR 23.003 - 026 (99) on Forbidden APN Ericsson 87.
network identifier labels
0374 CR 23.060 - 170 Rev 1 (R99) on Clarification Fujitsu 88.
on the TEID value of the signalling messages
0388 CR 29.060 - 182 on GSN Address in Error Ericsson 89.
Indication
0457 Revised 0388 Ericsson 90. last added sentence to be replaced with sentence copied from ???
0458 Revised 0457 Ericsson 91. approved with no presentation
0389 CR 29.060 - 183 on Clarifications on the Ericsson 92. postponed, to be discussed by e-mail; problem is the possible
mapping of cause codes towards 24.008 interwork of rel4 MSC with rel99 MS if the cr would not be
accepted for release 99. Concern from Japan on implementing it
in rel99
0390 Proposed LS to N1 on Cause Code mappings Ericsson 93.
0391 CR 29.060 - 185 on Clarification on the use of Ericsson 94.
the term G-PDU
0398 CR 29.060 - 186 on Clarification of Error Ericsson Handled later when 0459 has circulated
Indication Replace description of error handling with reference to stage 2 23.060
0460 0398 revised Ericsson Agreed with no further presentation.
0459 CR in SA2 for Clarification of Error Indication Ericsson
0399 CR 29.060 - 227 on Indication of relocation Nortel Networks 95. Withdrawn
requirement in Forward Relocation Request
0404 CR 29.060 – 187 on Clarification
on the Lucent technologies 96. approved with category Agreed by consensus
handling of sequence numbers in the
GTP user plane
0405 CR 29.060 - 188 on Clarificationsand Lucent technologies 97. approved with category Agreed by consensus
clean up of the error handling section
0412 CR 29.060 – 189 on Cause in Relocation Motorola 98. Vodafone + Ericsson + Lucent Why do we need in the target
Cancel Request RNC to distinguish why the old SGSN has asked for a cancel
relocation.
REJECTED
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0417 CR 29.060 – 190 on Clarification of Delete Ericsson 99.
PDP context response
CR 29.060 – 192 on Clarifications on the GTP Motorola 100. some rewording to be done.
0454 message treatment
Revised 0454 Motorola 101. to be presented again
0461
8.4 Handover 0364 CR 29.002 – 249 (R99) on GSM to UMTS Siemens 102. Approved with category change (agreed by consensus)
handover: addition of MAP parameter Target
RNC ID GSM to UMTS handover: addition of
MAP parameter Target RNC ID
0365 CR 29.002 - 250 (REL-4) on GSM to UMTS Siemens 103. Approved with category change (agreed by consensus)
handover: addition of MAP parameter Target
RNC ID
0366 CR 29.010 - 012 (R99) on GSM to UMTS Siemens 104. Comment to be added that Target RNC Id should be derived from
handover: addition of MAP parameter Target the Target Cell nId passed in the BSSMAP message by MSC-A.
RNC ID check in 23.009 if MSC-A is supposed to translate Target Cell Id
into Target RNC Id.
Finally approved with cover sheet category change after checks.
0367 CR 29.010 - 013 (R99) on Inter MSC Siemens 105. approved
relocation: addition of MAP parameter Target
RNC ID
0396 CR 29.002 - 255 (R99) on Addition of GSM Nokia 106. to be investigated iif 23.009 is impacted; if 29.010 is impacted.
channel type and GSM chosen channel Siemens in case of UMTS to GSM handover BSSMAP should
indications to handover procedures be used, while the CR implies a change of interface to RANAP.
Ericsson it has to be more clear what traffic case it is:
UMTS(interMSC HO)UMTS(IntraMSC HO)GSM
Ericsson is there a link to a CN1 CR doing the same kind of
changes n1-010336(366)?
Postponed. To Friday morning.
Withdrawn
0397 CR 29.002 - 256 (Rel-4) on Addition of GSM Nokia 107. Withdrawn
channel type and GSM chosen channel
indications to handover procedures
0403 CR 29.010 - 015 on Alignment of cause Nortel Networks 108. Approved with category change
mapping for 08.08 and 25.413 (Directed
Retry)
0437 CR 29.010 - 015 on Alignment of cause Ericsson 109. Approved with category change
mapping for 08.08 and 25.413 (Directed
Retry)
8.5 Multicall 0392 CR 29.002 - 251 (R99) on Clarification of the Nokia 110. Approved
use of multicall bearer information
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0393 CR 29.002 - 252 (Rel-4) on Clarification of the Nokia 111. Approved
use of multicall bearer information
0394 CR 29.002 - 253 (R99) on Addition of radio Nokia 112. Handover experts to be contacted. Do we need the CR at all? Can
resource list to the handover procedures MSC-B must be able to do the selection of bearers in case MSC-
B’ does not support multibearer
0395 CR 29.002 - 254 (Rel-4) on Addition of radio Nokia 113.
resource list to the handover procedures
0413 CR 23.018 – 068 on Paging not via the SGSN Vodafone 114. “agreed by consensus” category.
8.6 LCS
correction
0414 CR 23.018 – 068 on Paging not via the Vodafone 115. “agreed by consensus” category.
SGSN correction
9 GSM Maintenance (Teemu)
9.1 GPRS 0327 CR 09.10 – A011 (R97) on Mapping of Vodafone 116. complementary to 0369. Category must be essential correction on
unknown HLR error to access interface cause the cover sheet. Approved
code.
0328 CR 09.10 - A012 (R98) on Mapping of Vodafone 117. mirror of 327. Approved
unknown HLR error to access interface cause
code.
0329 CR 29.010 - 011 (R99) on Mapping of Vodafone 118. mirror of 327. Approved
unknown HLR error to access interface cause
code.
0352 CR 29.060 - 180 Rev 1 (-) on Clarification on Motorola 119. category is “agreed by consensus”. Rephrase the new text
IMSI Encoding
0447 Revised 0352 120. 448 and 449 numbers for the mirror cr’s. Approved.
0353 CR 09.60 - A100 Rev 1 (-) on Clarification on Motorola 121.
IMSI Encoding
0354 CR 09.60 - A101 Rev 1 (-) on Clarification on Motorola 122.
IMSI Encoding
0368 CR 09.60 - A102 (R98) on Re-configure the Siemens 123.
IEs in the PDU Notification Request and in
Create PDP Context Request to make it in
ascending order
0369 CR 09.10 - A013 (R97) on Roaming Siemens 124. complementary to 0327. Category must be essential correction on
restrictions for GPRS service the cover sheet. Approved
0370 CR 09.10 - A014 (R98) on Roaming Siemens 125. mirror of 0369. Approved
restrictions for GPRS service
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0371 CR 29.010 - 014 (R99) on Roaming Siemens 126. mirror of 0369. Approved
restrictions for GPRS service
0408 Failure of Authentication Parameter GPRS France Télécom 127.
when HLR is not reachable
0409 CR 09.02 on Failure of Authentication France Télécom 128. Some editorials (remove text in brackets concerning ss7 links)
Parameter GPRS when HLR is not reachable (remove french quotes)
0443 Revised 0409 129. Mirror cr’s are 444 (release 98) 445 (release 99) 446 (release 4).
443 + mirror cr’s approved without further presentation.
0410 CR 09.10 on Failure of Authentication France Télécom 130. withdrawn since it’s the same as 327
Parameter GPRS when HLR is not reachable
0411 CR 03.60 – A185 on Failure of Authentication France Télécom 131. liasion statement (tdoc 439) to be prepared towards sa2 to show
Parameter GPRS when HLR is not reachable the problem with attached mirror CR’s for relase 98 (441) release
99 (442)
0439 LS to SA2 on handling of an error case for 132. approved
authentication set retrieval
0440 Revised 0411 133. endorsed by CN 4 (see 0411)
10 AOB
11 Future Meetings
12.1 Output Documents
12.2 Approved CRs
12.3 Approved LS
12.3 Approved TS/TR
13 Close
NYA
Late contributions 0360 CR 29.002 - 246 (Rel-4) on Adding EXPORT Ericsson 134. Approved with correction in cover sheet
definition for LSAIdentity
(will be only discussed if 0361 CR 29.002 - 247 (Rel-4) on Removing Ericsson 135. Approved with correction in cover sheet. General comment:
time permits) duplicate parameters from SS-CSI category A cr’s should be presented to the plenary with the
corresponding F Change requests in one package.
Agenda Agenda item title Tdoc Title Source Result
item N4-01
0362 CR 29.002 - 248 (Rel-4) on Correction to Ericsson 136.
description of SS-CSI in HLR to VLR
information flow
0398 CR 29.060 - 186 on Clarification of Error Ericsson 137.
Indication
0386 Enhancements to service modification Ericsson L.M. 138. Withdrawn
0382 Alignment of Tunnelling with ITU-T last Ericsson L.M. 139. Withdrawn
changes in Gold Coast BICC editor's meeting
0412 CR 29.060 – 189 on Cause in Relocation Motorola 140.
Cancel Request
0413 CR 23.018 – 068 on Paging not via the SGSN Vodafone 141.
correction
0414 CR 23.018 – 068 on Paging not via the Vodafone 142.
SGSN correction
0417 CR 29.060 – 190 on Clarification of Delete Ericsson 143. withdrawn
PDP context response