Embed
Email

YOUTH WHO ARE ANGRY AND DEPRESSED

Document Sample
YOUTH WHO ARE ANGRY AND DEPRESSED
Shared by: HC11112516274
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/25/2011
language:
English
pages:
30
Effective Strategies for:

Working with

High Risk Youth

What is Wraparound

Milwaukee?

 Program which offers support and services to

families with children with emotional,

behavioral or mental health needs



 Care Management Organization

 Family Friendly

 Traditional and Non-traditional mental health

services

 Utilizes Wraparound approach across all

systems

What Wraparound Milwaukee

Offers to Families

 Administrative Services

 Care Coordination

 Provider Network/Community Resources

 Families United of Milwaukee

 Mobile Crisis Team

 Specialized Clinical Oversight

Youth and Families in

Wraparound Milwaukee

 Identified By Child Welfare or Juvenile Justice

 Children and Adolescents with Severe Emotional Disturbance

 Families with Complex Needs

 Youth at Risk of Placement in a Residential Treatment

Center, Psychiatric Hospital, or Corrections





 580 - 620 Families Enrolled

 158 Designated High Risk

 115 Designated Juvenile Sex Offender

High Risk Defined as Having a

History of:

 Sexual misconduct

 Victim of sexual assault

 Homicide or aggravated assault

 Fire setting

 Multiple psychiatric hospitalizations

Gender of Youth in Program





MALE

75%



FEMALE

25%









Current Enrollees - 2006

Age of Youth in Program





10-12 13-15

9% 48%



6-9

1%









16-17

Current Enrollees - 2006

42%

Ethnic Representation of Youth



HISPANIC

7%



AFRICAN-

AMERICAN OTHER

69% 6%







CAUCASIAN

18%









Current Enrollees - 2006

Custody of Children at Intake of

Wraparound Enrollees

MOTHER

52%

FATHER

7%





RELATIVE

5%

BOTH

GUARDIAN

PARENTS

7%

15% OTHER STATE

3% 11%

Current Enrollees - 2006

Family Income



$35,000 $15-25,000

8% 26%





$25-35,000

13%



Current Enrollees - 2006

Initial Court Orders of Youth



CHIPS

36%

CHIPS/

DELINQUENT

2%

JIPS 2%

DELINQUENT

60%









Current Enrollees - 2006

DSM-IV Diagnoses of Youth in

the Program

70



60

PERCENTAGE WITH DIAGNOSIS









50 63



40

39

30

39

20

26

25

21

10 24

11

11

0

CD/ODD DEPRESV ADHD ANXIETY AODA LEARNING MOOD ADJUST.

DISORDER DISORDER RELATED DISABILITY DISORDER DISORDER





Current Enrollees - 2006

Child Issues at Intake

PHY. DISABILITY 18%

ADJ. SEX OFFENDER 22%

FIRESETTER 23%

HX OF PSYCH HOSPITAL 24%

SEXUAL ABUSE VICTIM 27%

SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR 33%

AFFECTIVE ILLINESS 41%

AODA ISSUES 42%

HISTORY OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT 45%

RUNAWAY BEHAVIOR 46%

ADHD 59%

SEVERE AGGRESSIVENESS 70%

SCHOOL/COMMUNITY CONCERNS 87%



0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100

%

Current Enrollees - 2006

PERCENTAGE WITH ISSUE

Family Issues at Intake



PREVIOUS HOSPITALIZATION 10%

ADJUDICATED PHYSICAL ABUSE 12%

DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY 16%

FELONY CONVICTION 16%

CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE 18%

NON-ADJUDICATED ABUSE 26%

NEGLECT 30%

SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS 34%

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 39%

OOH PLACEMENT 39%

INCARCERATION 54%

SUBSTANCE ABUSE 56%

ABANDONMENT BY PARENT 59%



0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%







FAMILIES EXHIBITING CONCERNS

Current Enrollees - 2006

Specialized Services for High

Risk Youth:

1. Juvenile Sex Offenders – goals are to successfully

integrate into community with no recidivism.

2. Mobile Urgent Treatment Team for Foster Care – goal

is to decrease multiple or failed placements.

3. Mobile Urgent Treatment Team for Milwaukee Public

Schools – goals are to decrease school violence, failed

placement and increase attendance.

4. FOCUS – Provides the court system an alternative to

corrections. Goals are to decrease recidivism and

increase school attendance.

5. Professional Foster Parent Pilot – goals are to decrease

runaway behavior for young women and promote

reunification with family.

Activities Initiated to Assist Us in

Enhancing Our Approach to Working

with this Population:

 Good data collection

 Utilization of specific risk and needs

assessment

 Education and training of system partners,

especially court officials

 Training and ongoing consultation for care

coordinators, clinicians and family members on

best practices, treatment and risk management

Activities Initiated (cont’d)



 Ongoing evaluation and policy team review of

legal and mental health responses

 Collection and dissemination of outcome data

 Enhancement of community based services, ie:

specialized treatment foster care, crisis

stabilization, more culturally diverse out patient

and in-home providers

 Enhancement of community based resources to

support parents in providing supervision and

structure for youth

What are the Care Coordinator’s roles and

responsibilities with “high risk” youth?

 Establish rapport with parent(s) and all children

 Use good judgement---consult---collaborate and

support team in using available resources

 Attend the Community Safety and Resource

Development- High Risk Review with specialized

psychologist

 Take advantage of continuing education; learn about

providers with specialization

 “Best practice” safety planning

 Have RCCY-based providers to complete the JSO

Progress Report Form and attach to prior

authorization (Risk assessment tool)

 Report all critical incidents and changes in placement

Safety planning outline

 Team meeting

 Determine recording duties (chart)

 Start with family strengths-list resources

 Need for safety planning-risks to whom?

 Establish goals

 Brainstorm strategies, engage youth

 What’s needed to make it work? Develop resources.

 Incentives and consequences

 Keep It Simple

 Finalize plan and have all parties sign

 Review/revise regularly & as changes occur

Best practices in the SAFETY

DOMAIN

 Individualized, not formula

 Context-specific (often more than one)

 Developed as a team, with consultation as

needed, shared

responsibility/accountability

 Proactive, preventative

 Details relevant Family Rules

 Preventive education needs and strategies

 Not just paperwork

Which interventions have been found to

work best with “high risk youth”?



 Promote improved relationships with

parents, family, healthy peers and adults

(multi-systemic)

 Solution-focused (small change is all that

is needed, expect cooperation)

 Find the talent and promote it

 Forge durable connections with school,

recreational programs and religious

institutions (pro-social influences).

Program Outcomes



Utilization of Residential Treatment

 90% Reduction

 May 1996 - 370 Placements

 Currently - 70 Placements

Psychiatric Hospitalization

 Yearly Utilization Dropped

 From 5,000 to 148 Days (for Enrolled Youth in 2005)



Juvenile Correctional Placements

 100 Fewer Placements Annually

Service Utilization/ Placements

 Currently 115 youth adjudicated for sexual

misconduct enrolled.

 41 Family Home

 11 Relative

 13 Foster Care

 24 Group Home

 19 RCCY

Caregiver, Care Coordinator, & Youth Reported

Improvement In Functioning For Clients

75



CBCL 2005 Data

70

YSR

INSTRUMENT RAW SCORE









CAFAS

65





60





55





50





45

INTAKE 6-MONTH 12-MONTH



Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), n=159; Youth Self-Report (YSR), n=140; Child & Adolescent

Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS), n=225.

Mobile Urgent Treatment for

Foster Families

 Began in Dec. 2005

 Provides assessment and stabilization

 Year One – change of placement requests down 45 –

50%

 Year Two – 50% youth maintained in foster home

 17% moved to treatment foster homes

 15% back home

 12% enrolled in Wraparound Milwaukee

 6% moved to a new home





N=143

SPECIFIC OFFENSE TYPES THREE YEARS PRIOR TO

ENROLLMENT & THREE YEARS FOLLOWING DISENROLLMENT

IN WRAPAROUND MILWAUKEE





50 3-YEARS PRIOR TO 2005 Data

ENROLLMENT

45

49 3-YEARS FOLLOWING

40 44 DISENROLLMENT



35 39

30 35

25

26

20 22

15 19

17

17

10 12

11

5 7

0

PROPERTY OTHER ASSAULTS* SEX OFFENSES* WEAPONS DRUG

OFFENSES* OFFENSES* OFFENSES* OFFENSES**



Other offenses consist primarily of Disorderly Conduct (58%) & Obstructing Justice/Fleeing (29%)



*Reductions are significant at a p < .01 level using a Chi-Square comparison.

**Increase is significant at a p < .01 level using a Chi-Square comparison.

n = 842

Reduction in Legal Offense Referrals & Adjudications During

Enrollment & After Disenrollment for Clients in the Wraparound

Milwaukee Program





2 .5 1 YEAR PRIOR TO ENROLLMENT

DURING ENROLLMENT/PER YEAR



1 YEAR FOLLOWING DISENROLLMENT

2









2.07

1 .5

LI T

A A E N M B PER C EN

VER G U ER









1.36

1.18

1









0.95

0 .5









0.62 0.51

0





OF F E NS E S U

A D J D IC A T IO N S









Offenses Adjudications

n=828. Reductions are significant at the p<.001 level of significance using a repeated measures

analysis of variance.

Data through 12/31/2005

WRAP JSO SEXUAL OFFENSE RECIDIVISM

DURING AND AFTER ENROLLMENT

100 NO KNOWN

OFFENSE

90

KNOWN

80 OFFENSE



70

96

PERCENTAGE









60 89

50



40



30



20



10

11 4

0

DURING ENROLLMENT 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP



N=202 DURING ENROLLMENT, 100 1- YEAR FOLLOW-UP

For More Information About









Contact:

Mary Jo Meyers, M.S.

Asst. Proj. Director

Wraparound Milwaukee

mmeyers@wrapmilw.org

(414) 257-7521

The hope of a better

future lies in investing

in the health and well

being of our children


Related docs
Other docs by HC11112516274
nalichie
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
???????? ? ???
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
elenco ITD Secondarie 08-09
Views: 72  |  Downloads: 0
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 444
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
??
Views: 100  |  Downloads: 0
????
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
??????????
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
PIMA COUNTY
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!