Embed
Email

KWaste Power - NYU Stern

Document Sample
KWaste Power - NYU Stern
Shared by: HC11112505572
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/24/2011
language:
English
pages:
26
Karnataka Waste-to-Power



Astrid Fernandez

Annie Hsieh

Daniel Pedisich

Akshat Sarvaria

Sue Veksler

Agenda



 Background on India

 Current Business Environment

 The Case and Solution

 Risks and Benefits

No pun intended!

 Feasibility Analysis/ Valuation

 Future Prospects

 Conclusion/ Q&A

India: Social Background

Population (July 2002 estimate) 1,045,845,226

Age Structure

0-14 years old 32.7%

15-64 years old 62.6%

65 years and over 4.7%

Population Growth Rate (2002 1.51%

estimate)

Life Expectancy at Birth (total 63.23 years

population)

Literacy (age 15+ can read and

write)

Total population 52%

Male 65.5%

Female (1995 estimate) 37.7%

India: Political Background

 A parliamentary federal democracy.

 The Republic of India is made up of 29 states, and

six union territories.

 As the largest democracy in the world, India has held

regular and largely free elections since 1947.

 Economic liberalization through opening up to

foreign participation.

The Kashmir conflict with Pakistan.

India: Economic Background

 5th largest economy in the World and the 3rd largest GDP

in Asia.



 GDP growth averaged 5.8 percent in the 1990’s.



 India’s economic growth started to decelerate after 1996

due to:

- the decline in economic reforms in the financial sector,

infrastructure, trade and industrial policy, privatization, and labor

laws.

- slowing of growth in real investment.



 Effects of the Asian currency crisis.

Why India?

 The government has been

supporting and encouraging greater

outside participation in its private

sector.



 Long tradition of an established

legal, accounting, and judiciary system



 Higher disposable incomes of Indian

citizens and growing middle class.



 Large English-speaking population.

Why Bangalore, Karnataka?

 India’s technology sector

presently represents 1% of

its $200 Billion GDP (or $2

Billion).



 Expected to be $87 Billion

by 2008 (Nasscom and

McKinsey and Co.).



 Bangalore is the “Silicon

Valley” of India.

Our Solution:

Karnataka Waste-to-Power

Problems & Solutions



 Too much garbage = Problem

 Not enough electricity = Problem

 Waste to Energy = Solution





KWP offers a two-pronged solution,

simultaneous waste disposal and

energy production.

How does Waste-to-Energy work?

Why is Karnataka the best place?

Physical Characteristics of Solid Waste from some Cities in India



Cities Paper Plastic Metal % Glass% Ash& Total

% % Earth %

Calcutta 3.18 0.65 0.66 0.38 34.00 47.00



Delhi 6.29 0.85 1.21 0.57 36.00 35.00





Nagpur 1.88 1.35 1.33 1.34 41.42 34.81





Bangalore 4.00 2.00 0 1.00 15.00 78.00





Bombay 10.00 2.00 3.6 .2 45.60 40.00

Risks Associated With India



 Decreasing funds for education could impede

economic growth.

 Dispute with Pakistan leads to travel advisories and

less investors.

 Political instability and lack of consistent

government.

More Risks Associated With India



 Expertise lacking in regulatory bodies.

 Indian Governments have not come to terms with

independent regulation.

 Cannot trust or even speculate decisions made by

the regulatory body when in fact, an investor does

not know who is calling the shots.

But Opportunities Remain….



 Apparent mismatch between production and

population





Growth potential









Templeton Developing Markets Trust fund fact sheet, 2002

Opportunities in India



 In India the information technology

industry currently represents just

over 1% of the country’s $200

billion economy.



 This reflects expectations that

Internet usage in India will expand

at one of the fastest rates in Asia,

boosting knowledge and ultimately

income.

The Valuation

 Based on the model of Wheelabrator Technologies Inc.,

a U.S. based subsidiary of Waste Management, Inc.



 The initial purchase of a fleet of garbage trucks is based

on a fleet of 500 trucks, costing $100,000 each.



 We assume that we charge the municipal government

$30/ton to collect waste. This is a cost that we intend to

increase 3% per year in real terms.



 We intend to produce 0.5% of the energy required in the

local market (approximately 100 megawatts), and

increase our production by a rate of 3% annually.

The Valuation

 Operating a sanitary disposal (a capped landfill) costs

approximately $25/ton, increasing 3% annually.



 Transportation costs are approximately $18/ton, also

increasing 3% annually, and this represents the bulk of our

expenses.



 Plant operational costs grow at about 4.33% annually to

accommodate more input and output.



 Electricity is sold at the market rate, and increases at the

rate of inflation each year.



 The amount we need to put in a sanitary landfill for disposal

actually decreases over time.

The Valuation

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011



$ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ 77,854 84,750 92,257 100,42 109,32 119,00 129,55

$ 71,519,57 ,643.6 ,856.6 ,922.9 9,950. 5,840. 9,710. 1,359.

Revenue from waste management 65,700,000.00 8.34 3 9 1 46 34 86 81







$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ 5,371,450. 5,532, 5,698, 5,869, 6,045, 6,226, 6,413, 6,606,

Electricity Sales 5,000,000.00 00 593.50 571.31 528.44 614.30 982.73 792.21 205.97





$ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ (9,022, (9,818, (10,68 (11,62 (12,65 (13,76 (14,97

$ (8,291,793 813.96 282.39 3,880. 5,792. 0,743. 6,057. 9,699.

Cost of operating plant (7,620,000.00) .68) ) ) 82) 05) 96) 59) 38)





$ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ (23,35 (23,05 (22,73 (22,39 (22,02 (21,63 (21,21

Sanitary Disposal of Remaining Waste $ (23,629,78 3,022. 4,853. 4,455. 0,985. 3,571. 1,315. 3,286.

Cost (approx $25/ton,inc. 3% annually) (22,452,123.70) 0.01) 52) 15) 19) 12) 74) 36) 87)





$ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ (43,06 (43,63 (44,21 (44,80 (45,39 (46,00 (46,61

Waste Transportation and Collection $ (42,495,12 0,313. 3,015. 3,334. 1,371. 7,230. 1,013. 2,826.

Costs (approx $18/ton,inc. 3% annually) (39,420,000.00) 8.10) 31) 47) 58) 93) 18) 34) 82)





$ $ $ $ $ $

$ $ 13,943 20,495 27,657 35,481 44,025 53,351

$ $ 2,474,326. 7,951, ,276.9 ,780.7 ,415.6 ,277.1 ,116.7 ,752.7

Profit/Loss (146,250,000.00) 1,207,876.30 55 087.34 8 6 6 9 8 2

The Valuation



2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022



$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ 181,9 198,0 215,5 234,6 255,4 278,0 302,7 329,5

$ $ 167,117, 19,92 34,04 75,51 70,77 57,45 85,38 17,64 31,78

Revenue from waste management 141,026,767.54 153,518,644.60 027.85 9.47 3.35 4.13 4.30 5.53 0.58 3.28 3.94



$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ 7,112, 7,164, 7,217, 7,269, 7,321, 7,373, 7,425, 7,477,

$ $ 7,060,67 823.9 973.9 123.9 273.9 423.9 573.9 723.9 873.9

Electricity Sales 6,804,392.15 7,008,523.92 3.92 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2



$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ (21,00 (22,85 (24,86 (27,06 (29,44 (32,0 (34,8 (37,9

$ $ (19,301,1 2,798. 4,444. 9,336. 1,864. 7,689. 43,85 68,90 43,00

Cost of operating plant (16,300,338.14) (17,737,406.92) 70.41) 27) 87) 15) 08) 44) 3.69) 0.71) 9.25)



$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Sanitary Disposal of Remaining $ (19,26 (18,70 (18,10 (17,48 (16,81 (16,1 (15,3 (14,6

Waste Cost (approx $25/ton,inc. 2% $ $ (19,794,8 3,788. 1,868. 7,930. 0,813. 9,316. 22,20 88,19 15,96

annually) (20,768,526.85) (20,296,044.63) 17.28) 67) 38) 69) 46) 99) 2.87) 2.81) 7.35)



$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Waste Transportation and Collection $ (49,14 (49,79 (50,45 (51,12 (51,80 (52,4 (53,1 (53,9

Costs (approx $18/ton,inc. 2% $ $ (48,497,5 2,541. 6,137. 8,425. 9,522. 9,545. 98,61 96,84 04,36

annually) (47,232,777.41) (47,860,973.35) 24.30) 37) 17) 80) 86) 51) 2.47) 4.01) 2.04)



$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

$ 99,62 113,8 129,3 146,2 164,7 184,7 206,6 230,5

$ $ 86,584,1 3,625. 46,56 56,94 67,84 02,32 94,28 89,42 46,31

Profit/Loss 63,529,517.29 74,632,743.61 89.77 08 6.84 5.40 7.82 7.51 5.47 9.66 9.22

Revenue & Cost of Capital

Cost of Capital Calculation -

Goldman Integrated

Model









India



$ US Risk-Free Rate A 5.00%

Plant Start-up Cost (137,500,000)

US Market Risk Premium B 4.51%



Comparable Beta C 1.5



Country Premium D 6.00%



Cost of Equity E=A+(B*C)+D 17.77%









NPV using Cost of Equity $43,646,893.33



•The positive net present value of $46,646,893.33 is based on a discount rate of 17.77%, the approximate cost of equity, over

the twenty-year projected life of this illiquid investment, taking a 4.3% inflation rate into account, increasing all revenues and

expenses by at least this amount. We also include a thirty percent subsidy by the Indian government for the initial construction

costs of the power plant, which is being provided to companies involved in renewable energy projects.

Potential Problems?

 There is a strong chance that that our valuation

accurately reflects the worth of this project.



 Unforeseen costs, such as litigation, strikes, changes in

the regulatory environment, cleanup of environmental

catastrophe, or inability to collect funds due for our

collection services, could severely hamper our business

model.

Potential Problems?

Other risks to the valuation include, but are not limited to:



 High initial capital cost,



 financing issues due to lack investor confidence in a risky

venture,



 most of the technologies developed may not be suitable

for the nature of Indian waste.

Potential Problems?



 Lack of financial resources at the local and state

government levels.



 Lack of long term strategy and concrete policy on

waste management.



Lack of awareness of environmental issues in the

culture, tempering enthusiasm for environmentally

beneficial projects

But…



 Our model assumes that we are the sole collector of

municipal solid waste in Karnataka, and we process

100% of the waste.



This is likely to occur for the foreseeable future due to

the extensive start up costs to start such a business in

this risky, but potentially profitable, market.

Future Prospects

 The model could be implemented in other Indian cities, as

well as other developing markets.



 A real option to expand could increase the net present value

dramatically.



 The social benefits of managing waste responsibly would

make the value-added nature of this project a worthwhile

venture for the local and national governments to support.



 Other foreign investors in the region may be willing to invest

in this venture as well; everyone needs electricity and waste

management!

Any Questions?


Related docs
Other docs by HC11112505572
JVT O017
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
LA GAMA NISSAN
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Grade __
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
ACTA FINAL
Views: 32  |  Downloads: 0
E88747
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
PowerPoint Presentation
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Seventh Grade Science
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Ambiental
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!