Docstoc

PPAP_Submission_Checklist

Document Sample
PPAP_Submission_Checklist Powered By Docstoc
					Part #:                           Rev Level:                                          Rev Date:
Part Description:


                                                         PPAP Submission Checklist




                                        Type of Review (Check One):
Fisher & Co. Approval Review:                              Supplier Submission Checklist:

                                      Submission Information:
PPAP Due Date:                           Reason for Submission:
Submission Date:                         Design Resp..? (Y/N)
PPAP Review Date (Fisher Dynamics Use Only):
Supplier:                                                                 Program:
Submission Level:             Reviewer's Name:                                        Approved:

               Retention / Submission Requirements (Ref. Table 4.2 AIAG PPAP 4th Edition):
              *Level 3 is the required submission level unless otherwise noted
Fisher PPAP Reviewer:                                                                 Date:
                                                    Status:
Approved:
Rejected:
Interim Approval:
Expiration Date:
Reason for Interim:



                            Item Specific Criteria                                     Accept      Reject       N/A
SCR Approval (If PPAP is for a change)
         Verify that the supplier has included a copy of the SCR approval email
    A.
         notifying them it is ok to proceed with PPAP.
Part Submission Warrant (PSW) - S
    A.   Verify that there is a separate PSW for each part number.
    B.     Verify that items 1-27 are completed per the attached PSW Worksheet.

           Verify that the part number and rev. level match the supplied drawing
    C.
           and that the supplier uses the AIAG form.
    D.     Verify the IMDS Module ID# is entered under Matetials Reporting.
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Sample Product - S
           Is there a minimum of 1 sample from each cavity or 2 samples if the
   A.
           tool is not cavity specific?




                                                         Z-0020 07a82d0d-5d9d-433b-9779-301fd9cf365f.xls Rev 16, 2/19/07
           Insure that samples are identified with part number, rev. level and cavity
    B.
           number.
    C.     Insure that samples are numbered to the dimensional layout.
           Insure that samples are conforming to the quality standards. (FTL: have
    D.
           samples approved by quality)
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Design Record - S
           Does the submission include the drawing, specifications and/or
    A.
           electronic CAD data?
    B.     Are dimensions requiring inspection ballooned on the drawing?
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
                                  Item Specific Criteria                                Accept       Reject       N/A
Dimensional Results - S
           Verify that the Dimensional Results Sheet includes the Supplier Name,
    A.
           Part Number, Name of Inspection Facility and Part Name.
           Verify that the dimensions listed are numbered and correlate with the
    B.
           numbered dimensions on the print.
           Verify that all dimensions include the specified tolerance from the
   C.
           drawing and that the two match.
           Verify that all dimensions listed as "OK" actually fall within the tolerance
   D.
           range provided.
           Verify that each cavity is represented in the dimensional layout if
    E.     applicable. If not applicable insure that at least two samples have been
           measured.
           Verify that all dimensions are listed in the same units of measure and
    F.
           are rounded to a minimum of the same decimal place as the drawing.
           Verify that the inspector signs the bottom of the inspection sheet and
   G.
           dates it with the date of inspection.
   H.      Verify that the rev. level matches the print and submission.
    I.     Verify that all critical dimensions from the drawing are identified.
           Is the lab accreditation and scope included for the facility performing the
    J.
           inspection? Is it current?
           Verify that the dimensional results are reported on the AIAG Form (CFG-
    K.
           1003).
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Material Test Results - S
           Verify that the parts tested are to the current rev. level and are the
    A.
           same part number as the parts being PPAP'd.
    B.     Verify that the header is completed.
           Verify that the form includes the date testing took place and the test
   C.
           data is less than 1 yr. old.
           Verify that all test requirements listed in the design record and the
   D.      control plan are represented in the test results and that they conform to
           the specifications listed.



                                                           Z-0020 07a82d0d-5d9d-433b-9779-301fd9cf365f.xls Rev 16, 2/19/07
             Insure that all lab accreditation documents are included for each test
             facility. Verify that the certifications are up to date. A Lab Scope must
    E.       be included. An Accredited Laboratory must be ISO 17025 or
             equivalent. An internal qualified laboratory must be ISO 9001:2000 or
             ISO / TS 16949.
             Verify that the address of the certification matches the address of the
    F.
             test results.
   G.        Insure that the Fisher part number is included in the test results.
   H.        Are the forms signed and dated?
    I.       Verify that the heat traceability numbers are included on all documents.

    J.       Are the material test results submitted on the AIAG form (CFG 1004)?

 Reason
   For
Rejection:
                                Item Specific Criteria                                      Accept      Reject       N/A
Performance Test Results (Including Heat Treat) - S
         Verify that the parts tested are to the current rev. level and are the
    A.
         same part number as the parts being PPAP'd.
    B.   Verify that the header is completed.
         Verify that the form includes the date testing took place and data is less
    C.
         than 1 yr. old.
         Verify that all test requirements listed in the design record and the
    D.   control plan are represented in the test results and that they conform to
         the specifications listed.
         Insure that all lab accreditation documents are included for each test
    E.
         facility. Verify that the certifications are up to date.
         Verify that the address of the certification matches the address of the
    F.
         test results.
   G.    Insure that the Fisher part number is included in the test results.
    H.   Are the forms signed and dated?
    I.   If the product goes through heat treat, include Ford WHTSS or the
         AIAG Heat Treat Process Assessment (CQI-9) compliance.
         Have all heat treat testing requirements been completed in accordance
    J.
         with the print?
             Are the performance test results submitted on the AIAG form (CFG
    K.
             1005)?
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
IMDS Reporting - S
    A.     Verify that the supplier has included their IMDS acceptance sheet
           Verify that the supplier has submitted the applicable Restricted
    B.
           Substance Form (i.e. GM 3059, WSS-M99P9999-A1)
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Process Flow Diagram - S




                                                              Z-0020 07a82d0d-5d9d-433b-9779-301fd9cf365f.xls Rev 16, 2/19/07
            Verify that the process flow lists all steps in the process and is keyed to
    A.
            the PFMEA and control plan.
            Verify that the flow includes all inspection points noted on the control
    B.
            plan.
   C.       Verify that the process flow includes the correct part number.
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Design FMEA (if design responsible) - S
    A.     Verify that DFMEA is present.
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
                                  Item Specific Criteria                                     Accept      Reject       N/A
Process FMEA - S
           Verify that all process steps from the process flow and control plan
    A.
           match the PFMEA.
           Verify that all critical dimensions from the drawing are identified on the
    B.
           FMEA.

            Verify that all of the header information is complete and that the latest
    C.
            revision level and date match the control plan, flow, PSW and drawing.

            Verify that the supplier has taken action on their highest RPN's. Insure
    D.
            that the RPN numbers have changed after actions were implemented.

            If applicable, insure that all heat treat processes are present regardless
    E.
            of the facility where the process is performed.
            Verify all safety related failure modes are identified with a severity
    F.
            ranking of 10.

            Supplier Only: Insure that your severity, occurrence and detection
    G.      numbers are in accordance with the AIAG PFMEA 3rd. Edition Manual
            criteria.

 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Control Plan - S
           Insure that the control plan matches the process steps of the flow and
    A.
           PFMEA.
    B.     Verify that all significant characteristics are identified.
           If applicable, insure that all heat treat processes are present regardless
   C.
           of the facility where the process is performed.
            FTL - insure that the control plan includes incoming hardness
    D.
            inspection for HSLA steel grade. FD - pertains only to JCI programs.
  Reason
    For
Rejection:
Initial Process Study - S
            Is there a capability study for all identified special characteristics
     A.
            identified on the print? i.e. IPF, SC or CC?



                                                               Z-0020 07a82d0d-5d9d-433b-9779-301fd9cf365f.xls Rev 16, 2/19/07
           Do the capability studies represent each cavity and include at least
    B.
           30/PPK, 100/CPK pieces?
    C.     Do the studies demonstrate a CPK of 1.33 and/or a PPK of 1.67?
           Do the studies include the raw data sets, i.e. H bar & R charts,
    D.
           histograms and all points fall within the control limits?
           If the CPK and/or PPK results do not demonstrate capability, did the
    E.
           supplier attach a corrective action and/or containment response?
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Measurement System Analysis Study - S
           Verify that there is a GR&R included for each gage used to perform the
    A.
           capability studies.
           Verify that all gages have a %R&R (total variation) under 10%. If %R&R
    B.     is between 10-30%, verify that the supplier has an explanation of the
           issue.
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
                                Item Specific Criteria                                 Accept      Reject       N/A
New Program Requirements
    A.     Insure that a run at rate summary has passed and been submitted.
           Verify that a pre-launch control plan has been included with increased
   B.
           inspection.
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Qualified Laboratory Documents - S
    A.     See Material, Performance test results section points E
 Reason
   For
Rejection:

Engineering Change Documents - S


           If required, submit any engineering change documents not yet recorded
   A.
           in the design record but incorporated in the product, part or tooling.
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Customer Engineering Approval - S
   A.      When required, verify evidence of customer engineering approval.
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Appearance Approval Report - S
    A.     If required is there an Approval Appearance Report?
    B.     Does the report contain results from each part number?
   C.      Does the form contain the appropriate signatures?



                                                         Z-0020 07a82d0d-5d9d-433b-9779-301fd9cf365f.xls Rev 16, 2/19/07
   D.       Does the AAR include a pre-grain, post-grain and color approval?
 Reason
   For
Rejection:
Supplier: I have verified that this submission is compliant to the Fisher Dynamics PPAP Submission
Form.
Supplier Rep.:

Signature:
Fisher PPAP Reviewer:                                                            Date:
                                                Status:
Approved:
Rejected:
Interim Approval:
Expiration Date:
Reason for Interim:




                                                    Z-0020 07a82d0d-5d9d-433b-9779-301fd9cf365f.xls Rev 16, 2/19/07

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:20
posted:11/25/2011
language:English
pages:6