Embed
Email

RAC Capacity Planning

Document Sample
RAC Capacity Planning
Description

The following is intended to outline our general
product direction. It is intended for information
purposes only, and may not be incorporated into any
contract. It is not a commitment to deliver any
material, code, or functionality, and should not be
relied upon in making purchasing decisions.
The development, release, and timing of any
features or functionality described for Oracle’s
products remains at the sole discretion of Oracle.





Planning Then and Now

Su Tang Sri Subramaniam RACPACK



Oracle Real Application Clusters: Sizing and Capacity



The following is intended to outline our general product direction. It is intended for information purposes only, and may not be incorporated into any contract. It is not a commitment to deliver any material, code, or functionality, and should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions. The development, release, and timing of any features or functionality described for Oracle’s products remains at the sole discretion of Oracle.



Agenda

• Capacity Planning in GRID/RAC Environment • Scalable Infrastructure Design

• On Demand Capacity Addition and Utilization



• Criteria to add more Capacity • Real World Customer Example • Questions







Capacity Planning



RAC Capacity Planning

Advantages • All current practices still apply

• • • • Network Storage sizing Interconnect Network capacity Servers capacity Application Service design



• RAC flexibility ensures

• Good initial estimate is sufficient • Easily accommodates Growth • Emphasis shifts to capacity utilization







Storage Network



Networked Storage

• RAC works with both SAN and NAS Storage • Optimal Storage selection depends on ..

• Estimated I/O Response Time • Typically single block I/O requests • Common characteristic of most OLTP applications • IOPS – measure used • Estimated I/O Bandwidth • Large multi-block I/O’s • Data Warehouse and Mix workload environments • Occurs during backup/recovery operations • Estimation should include requirements for both normal/backup I/O’s



Storage Capacity Planning



Estimate initial data size and growth rate for all the applications (E.g., 500GB initial, double over two years, 1TB total)



Add the fault tolerance requirements (E.g., 2TB with RAID1, 1.2TB with RAID5)



Add the backup requirements to the size (E.g., Additional 1TB for a full, another 1TB for 5 incremental)



Storage Capacity Planning



Estimate aggregated throughput and IOPS (E.g., 2GB/sec, or 300,000 IOPS)



Calculate the total bandwidth requirement per node (E.g., 2GB/sec for 16 nodes = 128MB/node/sec or 300,000/16 = 18,750 IOPS/node)



Choose the appropriate storage class and build the configuration (E.g., 1,200 IOPS per spindle, 16-way striped = 19,200 IOPS per LUN)







Interconnect Network



Interconnect Capacity Planning

• RAC interconnect usage

• Oracle Clusterware • Very small messages exchanged periodically • Response time/load critical not big bandwidth consumer • Oracle RAC Database • Primary user of interconnect capacity • Exchanges both small and large messages between nodes • Key driver in deciding the network configuration



RAC Messages

• Small 256 byte messages

• Used by GES and GCS



• Cache Fusion blocks messages

• Db_block_size



• Parallel Query

• Parallel_execution_message_size • default 8k



Interconnect Bandwidth

• Message received (M) per second

• (#GES message + #GCS messages)



• Blocks received (B) per second

• (db_block_size * (#cr block received + #current block received)) / mtu size



• PQ message received (P) per second

• (PQ_message_size * # PX remote messages recv'd ) / mtu size



• Total bandwidth required per second …

• (Message received + Blocks received + PQ message received) / max network transmit capacity • (M+B+P)/85000



• Similar equation applies to send side



Example from AWR Report

• Global Cache blocks received: • GCS/GES messages received: • PX remote messages recv'd

• • • •



2,534 8,11 65



Db_block_size 8192 Parallel_execution_message_size 8192 Mtu_size 1500 One Gigabit ethernet interface for interconnect



• Total bandwidth Req’d= (M+B+P)/85000

• = (2534 + ((811 *8192)/1500) + ((65*8192)/1500) )/85000 • 8.5 % of capacity utilization



Interconnect Bandwidth

• Available Interconnect Bandwidth in IP based network

• Depends on the network packets transmitted • The comparison of theoretical bandwidth using total bytes transmitted is not accurate



Available Network Bandwidth

120



100



80



MB/sec

60 Series1



40



20



0 256 byte 512 byte 1024 byte 2048 byte 8192 byte



Message size in bytes



RAC Interconnect

• Experience shows for most applications single Gigabit Ethernet is adequate • In planning 70 % utilization should be reasonable point to add additional interfaces







Server Capacity



Server Capacity Planning

• To size the server optimally

• Consider total no of concurrent processes • Estimated CPU utilization of critical queries • Grid control/ SQL Trace should give this data • Plan for max run-queue length 2 * no of CPU’s • During high utilization periods never to exceed 70% overall CPU in the box



• Factor the percentage of capacity each server adds

• This would help to attain your High Availability Goals • In planned outage situations it will help to … • Determine whether surviving nodes can support the workload



Server capacity Planning

• Ensure optimal no of HBA’s are available

• To get desired I/O response time & bandwidth • Plan for 50-70% Capacity utilization



• Ensure optimal number of NIC’s avaiable

• For both public and cluster interconnects • And for NAS Storage if used







Infrastructure Design



Scalable Infrastructure Design

• Very critical aspect in new capacity planning exercise • Critical elements of scalable infrastructure design consist of …

• • • • Networked Storage Interconnect Network Optimally sized servers Software and Application Service



Infrastructure Design

• 2 SAN Switches • Low-end SAN Storage • 2 ports from each Storage Processor connected to each SAN switch • Equal-size RAID5 LUNS are distributed among all SP’s • On Storage Processor failure in Array LUN’s would failover

SAN Fabric 1 Storage Farm SAN Fabric 2



Storage 01



Storage 02



Storage NN



Infrastructure Design

•2 CPU and 4 CPU boxes •2 port HBA connecting to each server •LUNS are load-balanced on both ports •Protects from SP, Array port, Single HBA, Single SAN switch

Server Farm a001 a002 a003 aNNN



b001



b002



b003



bNNN



SAN Fabric 1 Storage Farm



SAN Fabric 2



Storage 01



Storage 02



Storage NN



Server and storage farms horizontally scalable (“scalingout”)



Infrastructure Design

WAN NAS NN IP Network Public/App-DB Private Interconnect NAS/iSCSI Management LAN



Server Farm



a001



a002



a003



aNNN



b001



b002



b003



bNNN



SAN Fabric 1 Storage Farm



SAN Fabric 2



Storage 01



Storage 02



Storage NN



Server and storage farms horizontally scalable (“scalingout”)



Infrastructure Design

Separate Switches for PUBLIC, Private, NAS if used and Management Network Redundant Networks for PUBLIC, PRIVATE and NAS

- For most configurations active/failover should be sufficient - Where Load-balancing used ensure correct option of Network Redundancy is used to provide both send and Receive side load balance 803.2ad is used to aggregate switch ports 803.2ad is used in the host to bond the interfaces



Storage Network

• Implement zoning / masking using

• Simple scheme where all LUN’s are visible across all nodes, if the cluster infrastructure is used by multiple databases



• Create equi-sized LUNS that meets planned I/O characteristics • Ensure LUN can support combined throughput of all concurrent RAC node access • Avoid ISL in SAN switch design by sizing the SAN switch appropriately • In ASM diskgroup add disks with similar storage characteristics and capacity



Interconnect Network

• Ensure proper VLAN for the cluster-interconnect network • Avoid cascading switches • If NIC bonding used ensure switch ports are appropriately configured to provide both send/receive side load balancing • Ensure similar vendors NIC’s are teamed in the host



Server Design

• Ensure similar sized servers are clustered together • Ensure Remote Administration has been correctly setup • Use Automated procedures to check consistency of correct OS, firmware and application software version and revision levels

• Cluster Verification Tool • Verifies infrastructure,Clusterware and RAC configurations • ORION • Measures available I/O bandwidth and Response Time • IPERF • Measures & reports network performance







Software Considerations



Cluster Software Design

• If multiple Database’s are using common cluster infrastructure

• • • • Ensure similar sized nodes are clustered together Install separate single CLUTER_HOME Install separate single ASM_HOME DB_HOME’s could be installed/expanded as required







Adding Capacity



When to Add More Capacity

• These Guidelines assumes

• All configuration and Best Practices are followed • And all necessary SQL, DB tuning is performed



• Key threshold to monitor for disk I/O

• Db_file_sequential_read > 25 msec • Db_file_scattered_read > 30 msec • Log_file_parallel_write > 3 msec



• Determine the source of the bottleneck

• HOST, HBA, SAN Switch or Storage Array



When to Add More Capacity

• Thresholds to monitor Interconnect Network

• Assumes following pre-requisites • Host CPU’s in any RAC instance node is not max’ed out • Correct Network Configuration and Best Practice followed • Log_file_parallel_write not > 3 msec • If cache fusion message latencies exceed following limitations

AWR Report Latency Name Average time to process cr block request Avg global cache cr block receive time (ms) Average time to process current block request Avg global cache current block receive time(ms) Lower Bound 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 Typical 1 4 3 8 Upper Bound 10 12 23 30



AWR Report – RAC Statistics



When to Add Capacity

• Server

• Overall CPU utilization constantly exceed 70% • Run-queue length is > 2*CPU for long periods of time







Real World Example



Mercado Libre

• eBay in Latin America • Runs marketplace from search to Bid • In 2004 moved from mid-range SMP to

• • • • 4*4 node Itanium2 Linux RAC Cluster 16 Gig RAM each Node NFS filer storage Initially estimated 400,000 TP hour good for 2 years



Mercado Libre

• Scaled incrementally as marketplace grew



1,600,000



Business Volume



1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0



2004



2005



2006



Nodes



Mercado Libre

Performance Characteristics MercadoLibre’s 13 node Linux Itanium cluster

• • • • 460 GB RAM clusterwide 286 GB SGA 14,500 URLS/second 47 GB/ redo /day



Only use a maximum 40% of the capacity of a single Gigabit Ethernet interconnect



Summary

• • • • Plan initial sizing with good estimate Design a Scalable infrastructure Grow capacity with business volume Resource utilization is the key driver



For More Information



http://search.oracle.com

REAL APPLICATION CLUSTERS



or otn.oracle.com/rac




Related docs
Other docs by Arun Mahendran
AMS Best Practice
Views: 167  |  Downloads: 31
Bhoomika Chawla
Views: 28  |  Downloads: 0
Microsoft Exchange Server 2003
Views: 343  |  Downloads: 72
Swine Flu
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 8
RAC DBA-2
Views: 918  |  Downloads: 151
Mr & Mrs Smith Screenplay
Views: 1680  |  Downloads: 52
Understanding RAC Internals
Views: 4089  |  Downloads: 299
Anushka
Views: 139  |  Downloads: 5
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!