Embed
Email

Date Name 51203 Cliff Lee_ Zale Schoenborn_ Andy Volk Email

Document Sample

Shared by: yurtgc548
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/24/2011
language:
English
pages:
4
Return Loss ---------------------This is an ECR item – ECR attached---------------



Date: 5/12/03

Name: Cliff Lee, Zale Schoenborn, Andy Volk Email: cliff.lee@intel.com,

zale.t.schoenborn@intel.co

m,

andy.m.volk@intel.com





Company: Mailstop:

C1. Intel Corporation C2. JF2-54



Address: 2111 NE 25th Ave





City: State/Province:

C3. Hillsboro C4. OR



Country: Zip/Postal Code: 97229

C5. USA



Phone: 503-264-8394 FAX: 503-264-6053





Your Company SIG Voting Member Name:

C6. Ramin Neshati



Phone: Email: ramin.neshati@intel.com









Brief description of the functional changes proposed:



Relax transmitter differential return loss from 12dB to 10dB. Changes to table 4-5 (page 213):

Errata for the PCI Express Base Specification, Revision 1.0a









Symbol Comments

Parameter Min Nom Max Units



RL TX-DIFF Measured over 50 MHz to

Differential 10 1.25 GHz

Return Loss

dB

See Note 4.









Relax receiver differential return loss from 15dB to 10dB. Changes to table 4-6 (pgs 216 & 217):









Symbol Comments

Parameter Min Nom Max Units



RL RX-DIFF Measured over 50 MHz to

1.25 GHz with differential test

Differential input signals of 300mV (RMS

10 dB value) swing around ground

Return Loss

-

applied to D+ and D lines.

See Note 9.

RL RX-CM Measured over 50 MHz to

1.25 GHz with differential test

Common Mode 6 input signals of 300mV (RMS

dB value) swing around ground

Return Loss

-

applied to D+ and D lines.

See Note 9.









Clarify return loss measurement conditions. Changes to Note 4 under table 4-5 (page 214):



Note 4 -



The Transmitter input impedance shall result in a differential return loss greater than or equal to

10 dB with differential test input signals of 300mV (peak value) swing around ground applied to

D+ and D- lines and a common mode return loss greater than or equal to 6 dB over a frequency

range of 50 MHz to1.25 GHz. This input impedance requirement applies to all valid input levels.

The reference impedance for return loss measurements is 50 ohms to ground for both the D+

and D- line (i.e., as measured by a Vector Network Analyzer with 50 ohm probes - see Figure 4-

25). Note that the series capacitors CTX is optional for the return loss measurement.









2

Errata for the PCI Express Base Specification, Revision 1.0a









Clarify return loss measurement conditions. Changes to Note 9 under table 4-6 (page 217):



Note 9 -



The Receiver input impedance shall result in a differential return loss greater than or equal to 10

dB with differential test input signals of 300mV (peak value) swing around ground applied to D+

and D- lines and a common mode return loss greater than or equal to 6 dB over a frequency









ft

range of 50 MHz to 1.25 GHz. This input impedance requirement applies to all valid input levels.

The reference impedance for return loss measurements for is 50 ohms to ground for both the

D+ and D- line (i.e., as measured by a Vector Network Analyzer with 50 ohm probes – see









ra

Figure 4-25). Note: that the series capacitors CTX is optional for the return loss measurement.









D

Specification(s) this proposed change is against:



PCI Express Base Specification, rev. 1.0a

w

Benefits as a result of the proposed changes:



Allow the buffer and package design to meet a more realistic spec target.

ie

ev





An assessment of the impact to the existing revision and systems that currently conform

to the PCI specification:



Transmitter and receiver design will have a relaxed budget. However, additional simulations are

necessary to ensure receiver package design will have a sufficient “eye” opening at the die.

R







An analysis of the hardware implications:



Return Loss design targets change for transmitter and receiver package and buffer design.

Better definition for the measurements of return loss target using a VNA.









An analysis of the software implications:









3

Errata for the PCI Express Base Specification, Revision 1.0a





None.









4



Related docs
Other docs by yurtgc548
倒塌陷落
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
中学教考网
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
スライド 1
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
“Youre My New Best Friend_”
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
“Why Hope”
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
“My Environment_ My Health_ My Choices”
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!