Embed
Email

Liability

Document Sample

Shared by: benben zhou
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/23/2011
language:
pages:
3
II









112TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION

S. 592

To amend title 46, United States Code, to remove the cap on punitive

damages established by the Supreme Court in Exxon Shipping Company

v. Baker.









IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 16, 2011

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHU-

MER, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. LEAHY, and

Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation









A BILL

To amend title 46, United States Code, to remove the cap

on punitive damages established by the Supreme Court

in Exxon Shipping Company v. Baker.



1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-

2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.



4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maritime Liability

5 Fairness Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS









7 Congress finds that—









VerDate Mar 15 2010 00:36 Mar 17, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S592.IS S592

2

1 (1) in the case styled Exxon Shipping Co. v

2 Baker, 128 S. Ct. 2605 (2008), the Supreme Court

3 held that when reviewing jury awards for punitive

4 damages under maritime law, courts should limit the

5 punitive-to-compensatory damages ratio to 1:1;

6 (2) in that decision, the Court conceded that

7 discretion to award punitive damages has not mass-

8 produced runaway awards, and although some stud-

9 ies show the dollar amounts of punitive-damages

10 awards growing over time, even in real terms, by

11 most accounts the median ratio of punitive-to-com-

12 pensatory awards has remained less than 1:1;

13 (3) district and appellate courts have the au-

14 thority under common law to reduce excessively

15 large punitive awards; and

16 (4) punitive damages serve to punish reckless

17 or worse behavior, deter future similar offenses, and

18 compensate for intangible injuries that would not

19 otherwise be available to 1 or more plaintiffs.

20 SEC. 3. REMOVAL OF CAP FOR MARITIME PUNITIVE DAM-



21 AGES.



22 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 301 of title 46, United

23 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol-

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS









24 lowing:









•S 592 IS



VerDate Mar 15 2010 00:36 Mar 17, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S592.IS S592

3

1 ‘‘§ 30107. Punitive damages in maritime law

2 ‘‘Except as otherwise provided in this title, in a civil

3 action for damages arising out of a maritime tort, punitive

4 damages may be assessed without regard to the amount

5 of compensatory damages assessed in the action.’’.

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis for

7 chapter 301 of title 46, United States Code, is amended

8 by adding at the end the following:

‘‘Sec. 30107. Punitive damages in maritime law.’’.



Æ

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS









•S 592 IS



VerDate Mar 15 2010 00:36 Mar 17, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\S592.IS S592



Related docs
Other docs by benben zhou
Pre lab Discussion Questions Glucose
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
Glossary Jojoba Oil
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
FANSHAWE COLLEGE POLICY MANUAL
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
ClDEllT OIILY
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Herbicide damage guide for cotton
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
Tetanus Toxoid USP For Booster Use Only
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
Message passing
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!