RISK REGISTER by huanghengdong

VIEWS: 6 PAGES: 4

									                      RISK REGISTER

DEPARTMENT:           ENVIRONMENT
SERVICE:              PLANNING
CORPORATE DIRECTOR:   IAN BURCHILL
HEAD OF SERVICE:      STEVE ROGERS
RISK CHAMPION:        STEVE ROGERS


UPDATED:              SIGNED OFF BY DIRECTOR:
27 OCTOBER 2006
14 FEBRUARY 2007
25TH JUNE 2007
11TH OCTOBER 2007
                                       STAGE ONE                                                                 STAGE TWO                                                                       STAGE THREE
Risk / opportunities (threat to         Risk   Risk    Assigned to   Risk score    Risk control measures / opportunity        Assigned to   Risk score    Actions to be taken to further mitigate /     Assigned to   Action     Risk score
achievement of business objective       cate   type                  WITHOUT       strategies                                               with          maximise risk                                               date       with FULL
(including risk type)                   gory                         controls /                                                             CURRENT                                                                              controls /
                                                                     opportunity                                                            controls /                                                                           opportunity
                                                                     strategies                                                             opportunity                                                                          strategies
                                                                     in place                                                               strategies                                                                           in place
                                                                                                                                            in place

CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                         REGENERATION & HOMES 2006/2010 RH1 - Clear vision for regeneration
   Risk that strategic partners fail      R        S      Steve          15        Regular and continuous engagement with        Steve           8            1. Ensure partners share aims                Steve        Sept         4
   to engage or agree due to lack                      Rogers/Mark                 partners through partnership meetings      Rogers/Mark                        through regular monitoring and         Rogers/Mark     2007-
   of awareness leading to                              Evershed                                                               Evershed                          update of framework                     Evershed     complete
   regeneration vision not shared                                                                                                                                                                                      and on-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        going

   Lack of resources to support           R        S      Steve          15        Work prioritised in agreed work               Steve           8            2. Monitor work and project                  Steve        Sept         4
   partnership due to other tasks                      Rogers/Mark                 programmes so that staff resources         Rogers/Mark                        programmes; provide regular            Rogers/Mark     2007-
   leading to risk of not completing                    Evershed                   matched to service delivery required        Evershed                          progress reports                        Evershed     complete
   work                                                                                                                                                                                                                and on-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        going

CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                         REGENERATION & HOMES 2006/2010 RH2 – Enhance Canvey Seafront
   Risk that contractor fails to        S/PE       S      Steve          15        Contract in place with appropriate            Steve           8            1. Monitor contract programme;               Steve       January       4
   complete agreed works leading                       Rogers/Mark                 protection clauses                         Rogers/Mark                        provide regular progress reports       Rogers/Mark     2008
   to unfinished project                                Evershed                                                               Evershed                                                                  Evershed
   Lack of resources to monitor         S/PE       S      Steve          15        Work prioritised in agreed work               Steve           8            2. Monitor work and project                  Steve       January       4
   contract due to other tasks                         Rogers/Mark                 programmes so that staff resources         Rogers/Mark                        programmes; provide regular            Rogers/Mark     2008
   leading to risk of not checking                      Evershed                   matched to service delivery required        Evershed                          progress reports                        Evershed
   work
CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                         REGENERATION & HOMES 2006/2010 RH3 - Options for key industry sites
   Risk that contractor fails to        S/PE       S      Steve          15        Contract in place with appropriate            Steve           8            1. Monitor contract programme;               Steve       January       4
   complete agreed works leading                       Rogers/Mark                 protection clauses                         Rogers/Mark                        provide regular progress reports       Rogers/Mark     2008
   to unfinished project                                Evershed                                                               Evershed                                                                  Evershed
   Lack of resources to monitor         S/PE       S      Steve          15        Work prioritised in agreed work               Steve           8            2. Monitor work and project                  Steve       January       4
   contract due to other tasks                         Rogers/Mark                 programmes so that staff resources         Rogers/Mark                        programmes; provide regular            Rogers/Mark     2008
   leading to risk of not checking                      Evershed                   matched to service delivery required        Evershed                          progress reports                        Evershed
   work
CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                         REGENERATION & HOMES 2006/2010 RH4 – Hadleigh Master Plan
   Risk that contractor fails to        S/PE       S      Steve          15        Contract in place with appropriate            Steve           8            1. Monitor contract programme;               Steve       January       4
   complete agreed works leading                         Rogers /                  protection clauses                           Rogers /                         provide regular progress reports         Rogers /      2008
   to unfinished project                                 Amanda                                                                 Amanda                                                                    Amanda
                                                         Raffaelli                                                              Raffaelli                                                                 Raffaelli
   Lack of resources to monitor         S/PE       S      Steve          15        Work prioritised in agreed work               Steve           8            2. Monitor work and project                  Steve       January       4
   contract due to other tasks                           Rogers /                  programmes so that staff resources           Rogers /                         programmes; provide regular              Rogers /      2008
   leading to risk of not checking                       Amanda                    matched to service delivery required         Amanda                           progress reports                         Amanda
   work                                                  Raffaelli                                                              Raffaelli                                                                 Raffaelli
CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                         REGENERATION & HOMES 2006/2010 RH6 – Affordable and special needs housing
   Risk that no suitable sites come     S/PE       S      Steve          15        Work on LDF has appropriate policies and      Steve           8            1. Monitor work and project                  Steve       October       4
   forward due to lack of policy                         Rogers /                  site allocations in place.                   Rogers /                         programmes; provide regular              Rogers /      2007
   resulting in lost opportunities                       Amanda                                                                 Amanda                           progress reports                         Amanda
                                                         Raffaelli                                                              Raffaelli                                                                 Raffaelli

   Lack of resources to carry out       S/PE       S      Steve          15        Work prioritised in agreed work               Steve           8            2. Monitor work and project                  Steve       October       4
   site identification and policy                        Rogers/                   programmes so that staff resources           Rogers /                         programmes; provide regular              Rogers /      2007
   work due to other tasks leading                       Amanda                    matched to service delivery required         Amanda                           progress reports                         Amanda
   to risk of lost opportunities                         Raffaelli                                                              Raffaelli                                                                 Raffaelli




                                                                                                                    2                                                                                                            Planning
                                      STAGE ONE                                                                  STAGE TWO                                                                      STAGE THREE
Risk / opportunities (threat to        Risk   Risk    Assigned to   Risk score    Risk control measures / opportunity        Assigned to   Risk score    Actions to be taken to further mitigate /     Assigned to   Action   Risk score
achievement of business objective      cate   type                  WITHOUT       strategies                                               with          maximise risk                                               date     with FULL
(including risk type)                  gory                         controls /                                                             CURRENT                                                                            controls /
                                                                    opportunity                                                            controls /                                                                         opportunity
                                                                    strategies                                                             opportunity                                                                        strategies
                                                                    in place                                                               strategies                                                                         in place
                                                                                                                                           in place

CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                        IMPROVING THE COUNCIL 2006/2010 IC7 - Performance management
    Risk that management               S/PC       C     Steve            9        Procedure in place for data entry into       Steve            5        Ensure that data from Covalent used to           Steve       March       2
    information regarding service                       Rogers                    Covalent                                     Rogers                    monitor performance and set or alter             Rogers      2008
    performance not available due                                                                                                                        targets in systematic way
    to systems or data not in place
    laeding to unmonitored service
    performance



CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                        IMPROVING THE COUNCIL 2006/2010 IC10 - Meet national and local targets


    Risk that national and local       S/PC       C     Steve            9        Work prioritised in developing and           Steve            5        Seek additional resource through                 Steve       March       2
    targets not met due to limited                      Rogers                    agreeing work programmes and ensure          Rogers                    appropriate channels to reflect importance       Rogers      2008
    resources deployed elsewhere                                                  that staff resources are available to                                  of targets
    leading to loss of grant                                                      provide service delivery




CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                        IMPROVING THE COUNCIL 2006/2010 IC3 - Customer relationship system


Risk that public perception of           R        C     Steve            9        Corporate customer promise procedures        Steve            5        Use corporate CRM team for public                Steve       March       2
service harmed by inappropriate                         Rogers                    in place                                     Rogers                    contact                                          Rogers      2008
customer engagement causing
damage to Council reputation
CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                        IMPROVING THE COUNCIL 2006/2010 IC5 - Improve user focus
Risk that public perception of           R        C     Steve            9        Corporate customer promise procedures,       Steve            5        Seek direct customer feedback through            Steve       March       2
service harmed by inappropriate                         Rogers                    agents forum and service standards in        Rogers                    service questionnaires                           Rogers      2008
customer engagement causing                                                       place
damage to Council reputation
CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                        IMPROVING THE COUNCIL 2006/2010 IC4 - Effective customer feedback
Risk that public perception of           R        C     Steve            9        Data from corporate compliments and          Steve            5        Systems and procedures adjusted where            Steve       March       2
service harmed by inappropriate                         Rogers                    complaints system analysed                   Rogers                    possible through learning from comments          Rogers      2008
customer engagement causing                                                                                                                              and complaints
damage to Council reputation
CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                        IMPROVING THE COUNCIL 2006/2010 IC11 – Improve VFM in service provision
Risk that cost of service not            V        O     Steve           12        Use corporate assessments to                 Steve            8        Embed VFM techniques in all aspects of           Steve       March       4
properly controlled through poor                        Rogers                    understand current service VFM               Rogers                    planning service work                            Rogers      2008
understanding of importance of
VFM
CORPORATE PRIORITY & OBJECTIVE                        IMPROVING THE COUNCIL 2006/2010 IC12 – Improve VFM in procurement
Risk that cost of service not            V        O     Steve           12        Use corporate assessments to                 Steve            8        Embed VFM techniques in any                      Steve       March       4
properly controlled through poor                        Rogers                    understand current service VFM               Rogers                    procurement of planning supplies and             Rogers      2008
understanding of importance of                                                                                                                           services
VFM




                                                                                                                   3                                                                                                          Planning
                                    STAGE ONE                                                                STAGE TWO                                                                      STAGE THREE
Risk / opportunities (threat to      Risk   Risk   Assigned to   Risk score    Risk control measures / opportunity       Assigned to   Risk score    Actions to be taken to further mitigate /     Assigned to   Action   Risk score
achievement of business objective    cate   type                 WITHOUT       strategies                                              with          maximise risk                                               date     with FULL
(including risk type)                gory                        controls /                                                            CURRENT                                                                            controls /
                                                                 opportunity                                                           controls /                                                                         opportunity
                                                                 strategies                                                            opportunity                                                                        strategies
                                                                 in place                                                              strategies                                                                         in place
                                                                                                                                       in place




                                                                                                                4                                                                                                         Planning

								
To top