Embed
Email

Madrid

Document Sample

Shared by: changcheng2
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
11/23/2011
language:
English
pages:
14
Orphan Works – A Potential UK solution









Benjamin White

Head of Intellectual Property, The British Library



13th April, 2010

Madrid, Spain

The British Library’s Perspective – Mass

Digitisation Programmes







4 million pages of 17th – 19th Century Newspapers



25 million pages of “out-of-copyright” books 1800

– 1900



2000 days of Sound Recordings



Turning the Pages – 20 + digitised treasures (Up

to 1940s)

26.5% Orphan Works after 20 years





Screen shot 2010-04-10 at 10.45.54.png

Online publishing of unique material

Marcel Fromenti (1886-1969).

Orphan Work from the V&A Museum

ICA Talks – 1980s

Evidence Base – Orphan Works







Sound recordings – depending on the type of

sound recordings the rate of Orphans Works will

vary.



Carnegie Mellon Universities published books

research: Orphan Works are at a rate of 31%.







ARROW Orphan Works study – 2010.

Existing UK Orphan Works Provisions







UK copyright law has the following limited provision:



Pre 1989;

Reasonable to assume author dead for 50 years;

Work older than 100 years;

Copyright owner unknown.

Digital Economy Bill - (Primary Legislation)





Clause 43 – Not limited to educational and cultural

bodies.







Secretary can by regulations provide for





“a licensing body or other person to do, or grant licences to

do, acts in relation to an orphan work.”

Digital Economy Bill – S.116A



Provisos:



1. Regulations shall provide for:



a) Deduction of administrative costs;

b) Period for which sums must be held;

c) Treatment of sums after that period – bona vacantia etc;

d) Onward obligations / regulations for recipients of a

licence from the secretary of state;

e) How to deal with the issue of an orphan work being

claimed.

Digital Economy Bill – S.116C



What is an Orphan Work?



Something that has been searched for diligently, and in

regards to which a notice has been published in a register.



The search should be reasonable and include



a) Licensing Bodies;

b) Associations of creators, publishers etc;

c) Systems of the works concerned;

d) Library catalogues;

e) Public Databases.



of the logical country most closely related to the work.

Digital Economy Bill – S.116D



Regulations to provide



a) Further details of the register;

b) Publicly available;

c) Rules around the removal of information in case the work

is no longer an orphan work.



The register to



a) Outline the diligent search steps;



Unless there are reasonable grounds for believing a diligent

search has already taken place.

Why did Clause 43 fail?



Broad coalition of vocal supporters – Museums, Libraries, BBC,

Collecting Societies, Trade Associations, Universities etc.







However:



1. Bill short on time due to general election?



2. C.43 also included extended collective licensing?



3. Orphan Work specific :

a) Not limited to non-commercial – BAPLA tabled an

exception in

the Lords.

b) Weak on attribution.

c) Stronger on protection of metadata relating to OW.

Gracias





ben.white@bl.uk



Related docs
Other docs by changcheng2
preview-islamic_jurisprudence
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Registration Form
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
9495_21rpt
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
AgNews-Willard.docx
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Screening RIA
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
AcuteRespiraroryIllness
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
actoctober11enrolmentform
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Colon Cleansing Diet Before Colonoscopy
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
BC_Gold_Division
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Tavola 7 - Unioncamere Lombardia
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!