Slide 1

Document Sample
Slide 1 Powered By Docstoc
					NATIONAL SHIP REPAIR INDUSTRY
        CONFERENCE
       1 March 2011
                                   SSRI “5 Big Rocks”
                                            End to End Process

                                                                                RMC
        Assessment                                                            Capability
        Plan/Policy                                                           /Capacity

                                   Sustainment
                                    Program
                                                                                              Avail
                                                           SURFMEPP                         Execution/
                                                                                              Work
                                                                                           Certification


Need for Integrated Assessment Program


Need for Integrated Sustainment Program


SURFMEPP: Stood up 8 Nov 2010 to
address scope limitations of SSLCM
• Improved maintenance material management
• Improved engineering rigor in work package development     Objectives of End to End Process
  • Availability schedule milestones
  • Maintenance and modernization integration                • Roadmap to a coordinated plan
  • Establish appropriate avail type, schedule, duration     • Improvement of processes
• Improved IT support systems                                • Coordinate roles and responsibilities between
  • Work package development, logistics                        government & industry partners
• QA oversight
    27 January 2011

                                                                                           Gaps identified
                                            Pilot Ship Schedule




                                                                                                              Sustainment
                                                                                    Assessment




                                                                                                                                      SURFMEPP
                                                                       End-to-End
                               Avail Type




                                                                                                 Avail Ex &
                                                                                                 Work Cert
                  Homeport




                                             Start Date




                                                           End Date




                                                                                                                            Manning
                                                                                    Program




                                                                                                              Program
                                                                       Position
                                                                       Process




                                                                                                                            RMC
   Ship




LSD 43    Norfolk            EDPMA           5/10/2010      3/7/2011    Begun
LPD 17    Norfolk            CMAV            5/31/2010     6/18/2010    Begun
LSD 47    San Diego          EDPMA           7/21/2010     6/15/2011    Begun
DDG 51    Norfolk            EDSRA            8/4/2010     1/28/2011    Begun
DDG 105   San Diego          PSA              9/8/2010    12/13/2010    Begun
CG 66     Mayport            DSRA            9/29/2010     2/23/2011    Begun
LPD 18    San Diego          PMA             11/2/2010      1/9/2011    Begun
LFD 6     San Diego          DPMA            11/3/2010     7/13/2011    Begun
FFG 54    Puget Sound        SRA            11/15/2010      2/4/2011    Begun
DDG 67    Norfolk            SRA              1/5/2011      4/5/2011    Begun
MCM 2     Japan              DSRA            1/12/2011     4/13/2011    Begun
MCM 3     San Diego          DSRA            1/12/2011     3/16/2011    Begun
CG 65     Pearl Harbor       DSRA            1/19/2011     7/13/2011    Begun
MCM 13    Bahrain            DSRA            1/31/2011      5/2/2011    Begun
DDG 81    Norfolk            DSRA             2/9/2011     5/25/2011    Begun
DDG 65    San Diego          EDSRA           2/16/2011      8/3/2011    Begun
FFG 38    San Diego          DSRA             5/4/2011      8/5/2011

                                            Full Test, 0 “gaps”                                   Partial Test, minor “gaps”
                                            Partial Test, significant “gaps”                      No Yield, major “gaps”

                             Enhance ESL & improve Readiness on every hull                                                                       3
                                                                           SEA 21 READINESS TASK FORCES
           READINESS                                                                                                                                                                                                                         COORDINATED
                                                                                                                                                                                        Sustainment                                         Participants include
      Readiness is defined
     as the ability of forces,
                                                                                                                                                                                         Program                                            (but not limited to):
         units, weapons                                                                                                                                                                                                                           -USFF                     -ISEAs
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  -CNSF                      -PYs
           systems, or                                                                                                                                                                                                                        -NAVPERS                   -SUPSHIP
     equipments to deliver                                                                                                                                                                                                                       -SEA04                 -NAVMAC
     the outputs for which                                                                                                                                                                                                                       -SEA05                    -CRMC
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 -SEA21                   -NSWCs
       they are designed.
                                                                           Task Force Mission: Perform a coordinated, comprehensive, holistic assessment of a                                                                                -PEO SHIPS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               -PEO IWS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          -OPNAV
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         -NAVSUP
       CORE ELEMENTS                                                         system or Class of Ships and develop Actionable Readiness Recommendations.                                                                                        -NAMDC                  -CLASSRONs
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                -NAVICP                   -Others
                                                   ONGOING TFs




                     +                                                        AWS-SPY                     MCM CLASS                                             LPD 17 CLASS                                BMD MISSION
                                                                           - 48 Actionable               - 51 Actionable                                                   - 100+ Draft                        - 50+ Draft                COMPREHENSIVE
                                                                          Recommendations               Recommendations                                         Recommendations                             Recommendations                     Factors Examined

+
                                                                              - Phase: 5                    - Phase: 5                                             - Phase: 3                                   - Phase: 3            Obsolete
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Equipment
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Spare Parts Support
                  Optimal
                 Readiness                                                                                                                                                                                                            Departures from         Past system
                                               +                                                                                                                                                                                      Specifications          alterations
                                                                                                  Phase 2: Needs /                                                                  Phase 4: Alternative         Phase 5:             Changes in system       System aging factors
                                                   5 - PHASED APPROACH




                                                                           Phase1: Issue
                                                                                                  Requirements                   Phase 3: Gap Analysis                              Analysis and Solution        Implementation and   employment
                                                                           Extrapolation
                                                                                                  Assessment                                                                        Selection                    Control              Adequacy of             COSAL Effectiveness
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Training
                         +
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      APL / AEL Accuracy      LLTM Management
                                                                         • Scope Readiness     • Metrics Deep Dive     • Issues identified in                                    • Historical study           • Develop concise
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      2M Repair Ability       ILS Documentation
                                                                                               • Evaluation of          Phase 1 evaluated                                         analysis                     Implementation
     READINESS = f(P,E,S,T)                                               Task Force                                                                                             • Alternative solution
                                                                                                 Current System         against system                                                                         Plan
                                                                          Mission                                                                                                 identification
                                                                         • Assess Impact and     Requirements           requirements                                             • Integration of
                                                                                                                                                                                                              • Monitor Execution                   HOLISTIC
                                                                                                                                                                                                               Timeline
       HISTORICAL                                                         Severity of System   • Needs Assessment      • Preliminary                                              historical data with
                                                                                                 of non-existing        Recommendations                                           preliminary
    READINESS TRENDS                                                      Issues
                                                                                                                                                                                  recommendations
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Execute Mission
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Requirements
                                                                                                 requirements           Formulated                                                                                                          FIGHT
                                                                                                                                                                                 • Feasibility
                                                                                                                                                                                  Assessment                                                              Self-sufficiently
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           SUSTAIN        Sustain Operations

                             Metrics
             Past                                                                                                                                                                                                                       MOBILIZE              Enable Ships to Get
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Underway
           Studies
                                                                            Root Cause         Requirements                      Performance                                    Recommendation                 Recommendation
                                                   MAJOR DELIVERABLES




                                                                              Issues             Analysis                         Evaluation                                        Selection                     Execution
                        INSURV                                                                                                                                                                                                                      RESULTS
                         Scores
                                                                                                                     Readiness    Requirement Action Lead Preliminary
                                                                                                                       Issue                               Solution
                                                                                                                      Issue A     Requirement A Action Lead A Solution A
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           The results of the TF
                                                                                                                      Issue B     Requirement B Action Lead B Solution B                                                                       effort will be
                                                                                                                      Issue C     Requirement C Action Lead C Solution C
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           referenced for years
                                                                                                                      Issue D     Requirement D Action Lead D Solution D
             Common Themes
                                                                                                                      Issue E     Requirement E Action Lead E Solution E
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           to come as the most
    Manning
    Reductions
                          Deferred
                          Maintenance
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              comprehensive
    Minimized on-the-     Increased Reliance
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           readiness study ever
    job training          on shore-support                                                                                                                                                                                                      conducted.
    Parts Obsolescence    Material
                          Unavailability
                                                                                  “Our Goal: Not to be a reference in a future Readiness study.”                                                                                             -VADM McCoy on
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    J.P. McManamon              AWS-SPY TF
                     SURFMEPP Stood-Up 08 NOV 2010
                                 SURFMEPP FY11 Focus Areas                                 SURFMEPP


• 70 Baseline Availability Work Packages (BAWPs)               • Class Maintenance Plan Strengthening
• Technical Foundation Papers – LPD-17 ECD Feb /                   • Corrosion Control Leadership
                   MCM starts Mar                                        • ABS Management
       – DDG/CG/LSD/LHD-A completed in FY 10                         • Surface Team One Support
 • Budget quality Ship Sheets for all Surface Ships

        SURFMEPP – TYCOM – RMC BAWP thru AWP                               SURFMEPP TFP Impact on
                               Management
                                                                            Life Cycle Requirements
                                                                                    (per ship)
CLASS           FY-10                FY-11        FY-12

DDG                       28                 55           87             • DDG’s: 74K Man-days added
CG                                           8            16             • CG’s: 73K Man-days added
LSD                                          5            9             • LSD’s: 127K Man-days added
LHD                                          2            4             • LHD’s: 504K Man-days added
                (12)
LHA            BAWPs                                      0
              delivered
                                                                       All ship classes will
LPD               to
                                                          3
               TYCOM
                                                                       have BAWPs, AWPs
LCC                                                       1
              ISO AWP
                build                                     5
                                                                        and TFPs by FY14
MCM
PC                                                        4

FFG                                                       3

LCS                                                       2
 TOTAL          28                    70          134
                                          ABS Assessments
                        Example of SSLCM / SURMEPP Impact
             Baseline Material Condition                    FY10 Ships                 FY11 Ships
                                                        •USS Philippine Sea      •USS New Orleans
   Utilizing ABS commercial experience &                 •USS Roosevelt          •USS Bonhomme
    tracking software                                   •USS Paul Hamilton               Richard
   Focus is Hull Structure & Key Distributed Systems     •USS Antietam            •USS Winston S.
       Hull, Scantlings, Deckhouse, Tanks              •USS Fort McHenry               Churchhill
                                                          •USS John Paul              •USS Chosin
       A/C, Electric Plant, CHT, Firemain, Chilled           Jones                 •USS Sampson
          Water                                           •USS Rushmore              •USS Benfold
   Finite element models produced                      •USS Arleigh Burke           •USS Ashland
   Risk assessment enables targeted maintenance           •USS Hue City          •USS Mesa Verde
    activity                                                •USS Boxer                •USS Shoup
                                                                                       •USS Barry
   Way ahead – Integration w/SSLCM & RMCs,                                           •USS Sterret
    CLASSRONs                                                                       •USS Bulkeley
       Included in ICMP updates                                                       •USS Stout
                                                                               •USS Lake Champlain
                                                                                   •USS Port Royal
    Ex. of Findings on LSD 43: Excessive corrosion and metal loss –               tank 6-103-0-W
                                                                         ballast •USS Germantown
                                                                                         (Revisit)




       Conditions found and documented on Ship CSMP: Repairs in progress
                      SURFMEPP Growth Vector



                                                                              SURFMEPP
                                  Current staff size: 96                     Headquarters
                                                                             Portsmouth,
     SURFMEPP                                                                     VA
                                                                            SURFMEPP Det
     CNSF LNO                                                                 Norfolk, VA
     SURFMEPP Det
      San Diego, CA
                                                                          SURFMEPP
                                                                         Det Mayport,
                                                                              FL
   SURFMEPP
   DET JRMC

SURFMEPP Det
Pearl Harbor, HI
                               Approved and Funded Staffing Plan thru POM 13

                                                                   240

                                                      197                         Steady State
                                            153
                                   79
                          36
    2008           2009          2010        2011           2012         2013
                                               MSMO
                                      National Contracting Strategy:

    Puget Sound                   20 Active Contracts in 5 Homeports
 Todd – FFG/DDG Docker
TBD – FFG/DDG Non-Docker




                                                                                  Norfolk
                                                                            BAE – CG, DDG Docker,
                                                                                      LHA/LHD
                                                                            Metro – LPD/LSD, FFG,
                                                                                      LSD Mid-life
                                                                            MHI – DDG Non-Docker
         San Diego                                                              Earl – LPD 17
  BAE – DDG, CG, MCM, LPD 17
NASSCO – LPD/LSD, LHA/LHD, FFG,
               LSD Mid-life

                                                              Mayport
                                                             BAE – CG/DDG

         Pearl Harbor
         BAE – DDG/CG/FFG
               MSMO Spiral 2 Contract Status
Awarded:
      Homeport/Class                          Awarded                           Contract #                   Awardee
      Norfolk DDG Non-Docker                  14 January 2010                   N00024-10-C-4405             MHI
           Norfolk DDG Docker *                   19 February 2010                  N00024-10-C-4308             BAE
           San Diego LPD 17                       15 June 2010                      N00024-10-C-4407             BAE
  Norfolk LPD 17 **                      15 July 2010                       N00024-10-C-4317           Earl (protested/recompeted)
           Mayport CG/DDG                         13 September 2010                 N00024-10-C-4406             BAE
           San Diego CG                           4 November 2010                   N00024-11-C-4400             BAE

Planned:
       Homeport/Class                                   RFP Release                                Target Award Date
         LPD 17 Norfolk - reevaluation                   ----------------                               January 2011
         Norfolk CG                                      15 March 2010                                  January 2011
         Puget Sound FFG/DDG Docker                      3 December 2010                                January 2011
         Norfolk LHA/LHD                                 20 October 2009                               February 2011
           San Diego DDG                                  25 May 2010                                    March 2011
        Puget Sound FFG/DDG Non-Docker                  March 2011                                     November 2011
         San Diego FFG                                   April 2011                                     January 2012
         San Diego LPD/LSD                               April 2011                                     January 2012
         Pearl Harbor DDG/FFG/CG                         April 2012                                     January 2013
         San Diego MCM                                   April 2012                                     January 2013
           San Diego LHA/LHD                               August 2012                                    May 2013
        Norfolk LPD/LSD                                 February 2013                                  November 2013
                                              * METRO protest overturned by GAO
                                                 ** MHI protest upheld by GAO
BACK UP




          10
                                                                Surface Ship MSMO
                                                       Spiral 1 Contracts Awarded:

Homeport/Class                    Awarded             Contract Number    Awardee
1. Norfolk DDG Docker             20 December 2004    N00024-05-C-4404   BAE (was NORSHIPCO)
2. Norfolk LHA/LHD                23 December 2004    N00024-05-C-4403   BAE (was NORSHIPCO)
3. Norfolk DDG Non-Docker         15 February 2005    N00024-05-C-4406   MHI
4. Mayport DDG Non-Docker         15 February 2005    N00024-05-C-4413   MHI
5. San Diego CG 47                24 March 2005       N00024-05-C-4409   BAE (was SWM)
6. Ingleside, TX MCM 1 Class      18 July 2005        N00024-05-C-2304   ANTEON
7. Puget Sound FFG/DDG            19 September 2005   N00024-00-C-8514   Todd Pacific Shipyard
8. San Diego LPD/LSD              5 December 2005     N00024-06-C-4402   NASSCO
9. Norfolk LPD/LSD Non-Docker     22 October 2009     N00024-10-C-4401   METRO
10. Norfolk FFG 7                 14 February 2010    N00024-10-C-4306   METRO
11. Norfolk CG 47                 17 May 2006         N00024-06-C-4415   BAE Norfolk
12. Pearl Harbor DDG/FFG/CG       13 September 2006   N00024-06-C-4408   BAE Hawaii
13. San Diego LHA/LHD             29 January 2007     N00024-07-C-4013   NASSCO
14. San Diego DDG                 26 March 2007       N00024-07-C-4407   BAE
15. Mayport FFG 7 *               12 July 2007        N00024-07-C-4413   MHI/TECNICO JV
16. San Diego FFG 7               3 August 2007       N00024-07-C-4415   NASSCO
17. Norfolk LSD Mid-Life          3 August 2009       N00024-09-C-4416   METRO
18. San Diego MCM                 14 May 2008         N00024-08-C-4405   BAE San Diego
19. San Diego LSD 41 Mid-Life     3 July 2008         N00024-08-C-4410   NASSCO


              * Terminated (no cost)
                                                                     MSMO Spiral 2
                                                                          Contract Status:
Awarded:
   Homeport/Class            Awarded                   Contract #               Awardee
   Norfolk DDG Non-Docker    14 January 2010           N00024-10-C-4405         MHI
   Norfolk DDG Docker        19 February 2010          N00024-10-C-4308         BAE

Planned:
   Homeport/Class                      RFP Release                          Target Award Date
   Norfolk LPD 17                      19 June 2009                           April 2010
   San Diego LPD 17                    26 June 2009                           April/May 2010
   Mayport CG/DDG                      18 September 2009                      August 2010
   Norfolk LHA/LHD                     20 October 2009                        August 2010
   San Diego CG                        19 November 2009                       September 2010
   Puget Sound FFG/DDG                 February 2010                          June 2010
   Norfolk CG                          March 2010                             October 2010
   San Diego DDG                       April 2010                             January 2011
   San Diego FFG                       April 2011                             January 2012
   San Diego LPD/LSD                   April 2011                             January 2012
   Pearl Harbor DDG/FFG/CG             April 2012                             January 2013
   San Diego MCM                       April 2012                             January 2013
   San Diego LHA/LHD                   August 2012                            May 2013
   Norfolk LPD/LSD                     February 2013                          November 2013

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:45
posted:11/23/2011
language:English
pages:12