Human Systems Integration
14 May 2007
Mr. Richard M. Etheridge
(OPNAV N125)
Objective
• Provide update on Human Systems Integration
– Program Baseline
– What we knew…
– Strategy
– What we know…
– What are we working on…
– Way Ahead
2
What we knew
Background
• HSI is a requirement and a commitment:
– Public Law 107-314, National Defense Appropriation Act, 03-07
– GAO Report - 03-520 Navy Actions Needed to Optimize Crew Size and
Reduce Total Ownership Costs, Jun 03
– Systems Engineering Acquisition & Personnel Integration Report to
Congress, Mar 04
– DoD Report to the House Armed Services Committee, Dec 05
• Navy needs to do more to consider HSI issues early in system
development cycle for defense acquisition
• No centralized office with clear singular authority to manage
program
• Navy does not optimize trade-offs among the domains or
among families of systems when they cross warfare areas
• Lack of authority and accountability to optimize human
performance capabilities and reduce Navy life cycle costs
– National Defense Appropriation Act FY 03-08
– Chief of Naval Operations Guidance, Mar 07
3
What we knew
Background
• Definition: An aspect of System Engineering that addresses the
risk to humans are required to operate, maintain, and support a
system.
– An assessment and plan to optimize manpower, improve
performance, and minimize risk.
• Systems Engineering Personnel Integration versus Navy
Acquisition Personnel Integration
– Enterprise approach to Human Systems Integration
– SECNAV and OPNAV agree that HSI requirements in JCIDS is the
focus
– “Provides a proactive approach to defining, developing, and
managing the future Naval Force Requirements” 1
– “Includes specific Joint Capabilities Integration Development
System requirements controls and assessments1
4
NAVPRINT
Program Baseline
Status Task FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 TOTAL
Adopt IMPRINT 0.5 0.5
Adopt MANPRINT Methodology 0.5 0.5
Improve Navy Modeling with IMPRINT-N 0.5 0.5
Improve Job Performance 0.15 0.15
Reduce Total Ownership Costs 0.10 0.1
Continue Integrating Manpower/Pers Tools 0.25 0.25
Design/Research Cognitive/Physiological Data 2 2
Develop Cognitive/Physiological Adv Tech Tools 3.70 3.7
Develop NAVPRINT 0.50 0.5
Develop Advanced Tech Tools and Applications 2.90 0
Total 1.00 1.00 2.00 4.20 2.90 TBD 11.10
5
NAVPRINT
Strategy & Status
Congressional Manpower, Personnel, 6.2 Applied Research for 6.3 Advanced 6.5 RDT&E Management Support for technical integration efforts
Training Problem in Acquisition feasibility and practicability Technology and technical information and activities
studies Development,
assessment of
operability and HSI Education and
productivity Training for the
GAO Report on 03-520 Navy Actions Fuels, & Workforce
Needed to Optimize Crew Size and GCCS-M
Reduce Total Ownership Costs, Jun 03 E2C Case Case Studies
Study
IMPRINT-N and Navy Stressors
Systems Engineering Acquisition &
Personnel Integration MANPRINT
Report to Congress, Mar 04 Analysis HSI Measures and metrics
Development
Preliminary Report to the HSI
Department OPNAVINST 5310.23
House Armed Services Committee
Human Systems Integration Activit Of Defense
in DoD Acquisition Programs, Dec 05 Architecture SECNAVINST 5000.2D
Framework
Follow-up on GAO Report 03-520, to USD 2003 NDAA
(P&R), 10 Mar 06
Follow-up GAO Report 03-520, 2004 NDAA
Department of Defense
To USD (P&R), Sep 06 Architecture
Phase 1 “What” 2005 NDAA
Joint HSI Steering Group “What to do Process”
Stood-up by USD (P&R), Oct 06 Volume 1 “Why” Phase 1 2006 NDAA
Volume 2 “What” Human
Report to House Armed Services Phase 2 “How to” Analysis &
Committee Human Systems Integration Integrated Architecture 2007 NDAA
Requirement
Activity in Dodd Acquisition Programs, Volume 3 “How to” s Planning
TBD (Jun 07) Phase 2
System
Human
(HARPS)
Analysis &
Requirements
Planning
System
(HARPS)
FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
6
What we are working on
OPNAV and SECNAV HSI Implementation
Joint Capabilities Development Integration System
(CJCSI 3170.01D)
O Domain Analysis Policy & Guidance
Navy Training System
Manual of Navy Total Force Manpower,
P Policy & Procedures
(OPNAVINST 1000.16J
Requirements,
Acquisition, and Management
N Shipboard Habitability Program
(OPNAVINST 1500.76A)
Human Performance
A (OPNAVINST 9640.01A)
Safety & Occupational Health
Systems Model
(MIL-STD-882D)
V Human Systems Integration
Link
Link
(OPNAVINST 5310.23)
S Operation of the Defense Acquisition System
(DoDI 5000.2)
E Implementation & Operation of the Defense Acquisition System &
C The Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System
SECNAVINST 5000.2C)
N VIRTUAL SYSCOM HSI Guide
Volume 1 Volume 2 Volume 3
A Human Systems Implementing The HSI Process How to Process
Integration Overview Into Acquisition Programs
V NAVSEA
SYSCOM Policy
NAVAIR SPAWAR
(NAVSEAINST 3900.8X) (NAVAIRINST XXX) (SPAWARINST XXX)
OPNAV Policy provides a link between requirements,
funding, and SECNAV acquisition execution.
7
NAVPRINT
Implementation
Policy
VCNO
NAVSEA 05H
HSI GOVERNANCE NETC
Barrier Removal
BOARD
JCIDS
SPAWAR 4G NPDC
NAVAIR 4.6 HPC
CNP NAVSUP 04
N12 Chair NAVMAC
OPNAV 093 NWC
Resource Executive
OPNAV 09F NPGS
Secretary
Requirements ONR PERS 4
CNA
N125 BUMED
Programmatic
Review Board
HSI Governance:
• Optimize manpower
• Improve Performance
• Mitigate risk
Environment, Safety,
Occupational Health
Policy, Requirements, Resource Integration
OPNAV N1, N8, N4, N6, OPTEVFOR, NAVMAC, HPC
Survivability
Habitability
Personnel
Manpower
Training
Technical Authority & Execution
ASN RD&A, DASNs, PEOs, SYSCOM,s, PMs
Requirements (Warfare Enterprises)
Aviation, Expeditionary, Submarine, Surface, Networks
Common Policy, Processes, Procedures 8
What we are we doing
OPNAV scorecard
When
Information Requirements Responsibility Support Applicable Statute Status
Required
OPNAV DODINST Identifies Capability
Resource 5000.1 Gap based on
Initial Capability Document Sponsor & SECNAVINST Milestone A CONOPS in FAA
Warfighting 5000.2C Assessment of each
Enterprise OPNAVINST 5310.23 domain risk
OPNAV DODINST
SYSCOM, PM,
Resource 5000.1
Capability Development Document Sponsor & Load Data in SECNAVINST Milestone B
Warfighting HARPS Volumes 5000.2C Identifies Capabilities
I-III HSI tools Required for the
Enterprise OPNAVINST 5310.23
system to perform
mission CONOPS
OPNAV Assessment of
Resource domain risk
CJCSI 3170.01E
Capability Production Document Sponsor & Milestone C
CJCSM 3170.01B
Warfighting
Enterprise
9
What we are doing
Program Scorecard
When
Information Requirements Responsibility Support Applicable Statute Status
Required
Title 10 USC
Initiation of All Designated as
ASN DoDD 5000.1
Milestone Decision Authority USD AT&L Acquisition ACAT 1D
(RD&A) SECNAVINST
Programs 07/2001
5000.2C
After approval of
MS A / Program
SECNAVINST MS A Initial
Resource Sponsor N86, N85, N87 N1 (MPT&E) Initiation Approved
5000.2C Capabilities
05/2004
Document
Joint Capability Integrated ICD Concept
ICD: 07/2001
Documentation System JROC Approval Decision MS
Resource CJCSI 3170.01E CDD: 05/2004 CDD
Initial Capability Document Authority as A, B, C CDD
Sponsors CJCSM 3170.01B Rev: 11/2007
Capability Dev Document Special Interest MS B CPD MS
CPD: 06/2011
Capability Production Doc Item & CNO C
N1 Prior to transfer OPNAVINST
Training System Installation Plan N44 OPNAVINST 11102.1
(MPT&E) from TSA to TA 11102.1A (draft)
(cancelled)
SECNAVINST Based on
Reported in JCIDS &
Development Activity PEO PMs 5000.2C Acquisition
R3B
OPNAVINST 5310.23 Strategy
OPNAVINST Based on Draft
Training Support Agency PEO PM Based on NTSP
1500.76A NTSP
NPDC, Assumes
OPNAVINST
Training Agency NETC Learning Responsibility at Based on NTSP
1500.76A
Cntrs RFT
10
What we are doing
HSI Scorecard
Information Requirements Responsibility Support Status
Human Systems Integration Resource
Plan
N1 (MPT&E) 60 Days prior to Milestone A, B
Sponsor
Training N1 PM, NETC Based on TRPPM and NTSP
Resource
Habitability PM Based on FNA and FAA
Sponsor
Personnel N1 PM, PERS4 60 Days prior to Milestone B, C
Manpower N1 PM, NAVMAC Based on Manpower Estimate Report
Environmental Safety N093 PM, Safety Cntr TBD
Occupational Health N091 BUMED TBD
Resource
Survivality PM Based on CONOPS and ICD, CDD
Sponsor
s
Applicable Statute: OPNAVINST 1500.76A
When Required: Initial: MS A, Draft: MS B/C, Update: MS C 14 working days prior to release date
11
Way Ahead
OPNAVINST 5310.23 implementation
HARPS Functional Requirements Document
Implement OPNAVINST 5310.23 and HARPS I/II
Implement FY07-08 Funding Plan
Update JCIDS 3170.01 Instruction and Manual
Revise SECNAVINST 5000.2D
– ASN Role/Resp (M&RA, I&E, RD&A, etc.)
– OPNAV Role/Resp (N1, N4, N6, N8, etc.)
• Systems Engineering Plan and Technical Authority
Guidance
• Department of the Navy Acquisition Guidebook Guidance
Submit Congressional Report by Jun 07
12
BACK-UP
13
What we are working on
HSI Success: E-2D Hawkeye
NAVAIR 4.6 Before
High HSI impact
- Cost avoidance
- Survivability, Safety, Health Hazard Risk avoidance
- Performance enhancement
- Cross domain use of task and role analysis
• Mockup used for assessing software in
After
development, as well as anthropometrics,
hardware interfaces, lighting evaluation,
maintainability, and general operator usability
14
What we are working on
HSI Success: DDG-1000
NAVSEA 03/05H
High HSI impact
– Cost avoidance
– Survivability, Safety, Health Hazard
avoidance
– Performance enhancement
– Cross domain use of task and role analysis
• Fleet brought in early to identify design hazards,
proposing modifications to optimize design for
human performance
• Leveraged human performance modeling very
early in system design to explore impact of manning
concepts, automation technologies, and other
system design concepts on crew ability perform the mission
15
What we are working on
HSI Success: GCCS-M
SPAWAR 04G
Significant HSI Pay-off
– Performance enhancement
– Cost avoidance
– Cross domain use of task and role analysis
• Applied HSI to each domain to improve
human performance and systems performance
• Analyzed existing task and function information,
yielding task and redesign
• Program Management Office and fleet customer
response extremely positive
16
What we are working on
Human Performance Success: The Seal Story
SEAL Selection SEAL Promotion
Goal: Reduce attrition in BUDS by Goal: Develop a promotion model that
identifying more, better qualified better reflects SEAL values than current
candidates. FMS (Final Multiple Score).
Recommendation: Develop psychological Recommendation: Implement a SEAL
battery to better select SEAL candidates. promotional algorithm based upon
Status: critical factors.
• Deployed battery to incoming SEAL Status:
class. (FEB 07) • Conducted a ‘mock’ board using
• Compare candidate retention data from algorithm with high success. (AUG 06)
‘Hell Week” against selection battery • Replicate ‘mock’ board using new SEAL
results. (MAR 07-in Great Lakes) rating exam. (JUN 07)
17
What we are working on
HARPS Timeline
6.5 RDT&E Management Support for technical integration efforts and technical
information and activities
HARPS Phase I:
•Job Task Analysis
•NTSP Data
HARPS Phase I
•Manpower Estimate
Report Data •Scope (Complete)
•Executable HSI IA •Functional Req (Complete)
•Software Spec (Complete)
Phase I Implementation
•SOA Tech Stack (Complete)
HARPS Phase II: •Software Build 1 (July 07)
•Software Build 2 (Aug 07)
•NTSP Data Capture •Software Test/Pilot (Sept 07)
•Web Service •Rpt of Lessons Learned (Sept 07)
Integration with •Phase I Implem Strategy (Sept 07)
Manpower, Learning
Modeling & Simulation
•Executive Dashboard
& Decision Support
HARPS Phase II
•Phase I Operational (Implementation)
•Project Scope
•Functional Requirements
•Software Specifications Phase II Implementation
•Software Build 1
•Software Build 2
•Software Test/Pilot
•Training Development & Delivery
•DADMS Registration
FY06 FY07 FY08
18
What we are working on
IMPRINT-N Timeline
6.5 RDT&E Management Support for technical integration efforts and technical
information and activities
“IMPRINT-N” FY ‘06
“IMPRINT-N” FY ‘06: •Research whole body vibration
•Sea state stressor literature (Complete)
task effects •Review results of new sea trials
(Delayed)
•Stressor benchmarks •Preliminary algorithm development
•Whole Person (Ongoing)
Assessment •Implement stressor benchmarks in
IMPRINT Pro (Complete)
•Draft paper on WPA and potential
future IMPRINT Pro impacts
(Complete)
“IMPRINT-N” FY ‘07: “IMPRINT-N” FY ‘07
•Advanced sea state •Research other sea state impacts (Motion
stressor architecture sickness over time) and Motion Induced
•Add Navy personnel Interruptions)
designators •Collect Navy personnel designators (ratings) and
associated attributes
•Add Navy personnel •Define functional requirements for DADMS and
projection capability NMCI
•DADMS and NMCI •Design preliminary plug-in for IMPRINT Pro sea
state impacts
•Establish a validation plan for plug-in use
•DADMS Registration and NMCI certification
FY06 FY07 FY08
19