Embed
Email

802

Document Sample
802
Shared by: HC111123035923
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/22/2011
language:
English
pages:
4
May 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0674r1



IEEE P802.11

Wireless LANs



TGy LB104 Submission for Editorial comments

Date: 2007-05-13



Author(s):

Name Affiliation Address Phone email

Peter 170 W. Tasman Dr., San Jose,

Cisco Systems 408-527-0815 petere@cisco.com

Ecclesine CA 95134







Abstract

This document is aligned with P802.11-2007, P802.11k/D7.0, P802.11r/D5.0 for baseline, P802.11y/D2.0, and

and submissions 07/0603r0 (CID 1093), 07/0673 non-Editorial comments and yyy 3-11.14 comments, addresses

the following LB104 comments:



CIDs: 1027, 1028, 1035, 1061, 1062, 1199

CIDs: 1120, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1124, 1125, 1161, 1162, 1163

CIDs: 1017, 1018, 1019, 1029, 1031, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067, 1068, 1102,

1126, 1127, 1128, 1130, 1131, 1132, 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167, 1168, 1169, 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173, 1174, 1200, 1204, 1205,

1208, 1209, 1210, 1211, 1212, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1239, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1255, 1256, 1257, 1258, 1259

CIDs: 1032, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1060, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1134, 1136, 1150, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1186

CIDs: 1022, 1023, 1025, 1026, 1048, 1049, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1058, 1059, 1073, 1074, 1075, 1076, 1077, 1084,

1085, 1095, 1138, 1155, 1159, 1188, 1189, 1190, 1191, 1192, 1193, 1194, 1195, 1196, 1197









Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the

contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after

further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.



Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution,

and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE‟s name any IEEE

Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE‟s sole discretion to permit

others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and

accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11.



Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures

, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the

known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant

with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to

the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays

in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify

the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under

patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you

have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at .









Submission page 1 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0674r1







Clause 0

E CIDs: 1027, 1028, 1035, 1061, 1062, 1100, 1118, 1119, 1160, 1199, 1202, 1203



Comment 1199 says that a regulatory domain may span several countries, but fails to provide an example

from the standard. Proposed Comment Resolution: “In 802.11-2007, Country Code is unique to a single

country – ISO/IEC 3166-1, and regulatory domains use one country at a time.” Propose Reject Comment

1199.



Proposed Resolution:

Accept Comments 1027, 1028, 1035, 1061, 1062, 1100, 1118, 1119, 1160, 1202 and 1203

without discussion.

Reject based on discussion in 07/0674r1: 1199







Clause 3



E CIDs: 1120, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1124, 1125, 1161, 1162, 1163



Discussion:

In 11y/D2.0: Note that submission yyyr0 3-11.14 CID 1034 would change „enabling AP‟ to „control STA‟,

consequently enabling AP‟s definition is removed, and CID 1123 is moot if that suggestion is approved. CID 1163‟s

suggestion is considered in that submission yyyr0.



Proposed Resolution:

Accept Comments 1120, 1121, 1122, 1124, 1125, 1161, and 1162 without discussion.

Accept in Principle based on discussion in 07/0674r1: 1123 and 1163





Clauses 7, 9, 10, 11.9.7



E CIDs: 1017, 1018, 1019, 1029, 1031, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1063, 1064,

1065, 1066, 1067, 1068, 1102, 1126, 1127, 1128, 1130, 1131, 1132, 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167,

1168, 1169, 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173, 1174, 1200, 1204, 1205, 1208, 1209, 1210, 1211, 1212,

1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1239, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1255, 1256, 1257, 1258, 1259



Discussion:

In 11y/D2.0:

Comment 1019 rewords a sentence, however CID 1218 corrects the grammar error. Propose Accept in Principle

CID 1019.

Comment 1128 rewords 7.3.2.49 Altitude definition, where Altitude is a 30-bit number with 22-bit integer part and

8-bit fraction. Propose Accept in Principle CID 1128.

Comment 1165 provides an incomplete reference for „transmission‟, which is specified in both 11.9.7.1 and

11.9.7.2. Propose Accept in Principle CID 1165.

Comment 1200 would rename Dependent Enablement Identifier, but provides no rational for the change. Comment

errorenously says DEI is 4 octets, when it is 2 octets. Propose Reject CID 1200 for lack of reason to change name.

Comment 1204 says that Figure 112z is not drawn consistent with the base standard and asks it be redrawn as two

figures, one for octets, and the second for bit fields. The base standard has many bit field figures, e.g. Figure 20





Submission page 2 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0674r1



Sequence Control field, and Figure 112z is drawn consistent with the base standard and TGn‟s figures. Propose

Reject CID 1204

Comment 1208 says the font in figures should be consistent, and to change to Times Roman for that font. The base

standard uses Arial for figures, as does D2.0. Propose Accept in Principle CID 1208, as the suggested Remedy does

not agree with the base standard.

Comment 1256 7.3.2.50 notes the “New Regulatory Class” may be unchanged after the channel switch, and asks for

the statement to be rewritten. Propose change 'to which the STA is moving' to 'after the channel switch' in

definitions of both New Regulatory Class and New Channel Number. Propose Accept in Principle CID 1256.

Comment 1257 9.8.4 on the first sentence misstates the text 'on a AirPropagationTime'?, where the text is „based on

aAirPropagationTime‟, a value transferred across the PMD interface to the MAC, and used to calculate SlotTime.

The comment says: Should be 'on an AirPropagationTime'. Propose Reject CID 1257.





Proposed Resolution:

Accept Comments 1017, 1018, 1029, 1031, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066,

1067, 1068, 1102, 1126, 1127, 1130, 1131, 1132, 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167, 1168, 1169, 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173,

1174, 1204, 1205, 1209, 1210, 1211, 1212, 1215, 1216, 1217, 1218, 1239, 1240, 1241, 1242, 1243, 1255, 1258 and

1259 without discussion.

Accept in Principle based on discussion in 07/0674: 1019, 1128, 1165, 1208 and 1256.

Reject based on discussion in 07/0674: 1200, 1257







Clause 17



E CIDs: 1032, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1060, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1134, 1136, 1150, 1183, 1184, 1185,

1186





Proposed Resolution:

Accept Comments 1032, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1060, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1134, 1136, 1150, 1183, 1184, 1185 and 1186

without discussion.







Annex Clauses

E CIDs: 1022, 1023, 1025, 1026, 1048, 1049, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1058, 1059, 1073, 1074,

1075, 1076, 1077, 1084, 1085, 1095, 1138, 1155, 1159, 1188, 1189, 1190, 1191, 1192, 1193, 1194, 1195,

1196, 1197



Discussion:

Comment 1188 Annex D says „dot11LCIDSEImplemented is defined here (and not used in the document),‟ rename

it to dot11DSEImplemented, without a reason for the renaming. Propose Reject CID 1188, as no rational for the

renaming is given, and the variable is used in response to technical comments on Annex J.2. Propose Reject

Comment 1188



Accept Comments 1022, 1023, 1025, 1026, 1048, 1049, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1058, 1059, 1073, 1074,

1075, 1076, 1077, 1084, 1085, 1095, 1138, 1155, 1159, 1189, 1190, 1191, 1192, 1193, 1194, 1195, 1196 and 1197

without discussion.



Proposed Resolution:







Submission page 3 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems

May 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0674r1



Accept Comments 1022, 1023, 1025, 1026, 1048, 1049, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1058, 1059, 1073, 1074,

1075, 1076, 1077, 1084, 1085, 1095, 1138, 1155, 1159, 1189, 1190, 1191, 1192, 1193, 1194, 1195, 1196, 1197

Reject based on discussion in 07/0674:1188









Submission page 4 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems


Related docs
Other docs by HC111123035923
31 October, 1995
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
MEMORIA TECNICA Y DESCRIPTIVA
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Playoff State Ranks
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
GenSpec - Cat6 UTP & 50/125; 4 drops
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Attachment B
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
6DAE835059200
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
Tabelle1
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Qu� es VideoPoint
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!