Embed
Email

Discussion

Document Sample
Discussion
Shared by: HC111123013553
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
3
posted:
11/22/2011
language:
pages:
33
Discussion

Hamediseresht E.

Structure of article

• Title

• Abstract and keywords

• Authors

• Introduction

• Methods and Materials

• Discussion

• Conclusion

• Acknowledgment

• References

The meaning?

• Chat • Consultation

• Talk • Deliberation

• Dialogue • Conversation

• Debate • Argument

• Discourse • Exchange of views

Discusion

• When most people read paper, they read the title

and abstract first, then the introduction, some

graphs or tables and then the discussion.

THEREFORE:

the discussion should begin by summarizing the

main findings .Then interpret the findings in

relation to the introduction and finally draw

conclusion.Keep the discussion to the results;

don`t go beyond the data

Discussion

• The least formalized part of an article

• The most difficult part of an article

• The structure is the the same for every experiment

• It`s practice of logic and discipline

• It`s not repeating the results

• Since sometimes results are self-explanatory,many

students find it difficult to know what material to

add in this last section

Discussion

• Simply:

Discussion is where you

REFER to your results …

EXPLAIN your results …

INTERPRET your results in light of other work

in field …

(Don`t repeat or reformulate or

recapitulate results!)

Answer research question







Support and defend answers with results







EXPLAIN

-Conflicting results you goto

-Unexpected findings

-Discrepancies with otehr research







State limitation of the study







Establish newnes







Announce further research

Discussion

• Answer research question

• Support and defend answers with results

• EXPLAIN:

- conflicting results you got

- unexpected findings

- discrepancies with other research

• State limitations of the study

• Establish newness

• Announce further research

Discussion



Your findings



Literature



Theory



practice

Discussion

• Why the research was done?

• Interpretation

• Findings in association with hypothesis

• Findings in association with other researches

• Evaluation of scientific validity

• Comments about meaningful results

• Explanation of negative opinions

• Association of topic with current sitiuation

• Future studies

Discussion



First paragraph



** Summarize main findings

** Start by presenting the essential

conclusions of your specific study

Discussion



• What`s this?

Discussion

• Remember inverted triangle at Introduction…!



• There is a triangle at Discussion too, but is not

inverted..!



Basically discussion contains several parts in no

particular order but roughly moving from specific

(related to your experiment only) to general (how

your finding fit in the larger scientific community)

Discussion



• General structure of an article

Discussion

• Explain whether data support your hypothesis

• Acknowledge any anomalous data or deviations

from what you expected (next slide)

• Derive conclusions based on your findings and

about the process you`re studing

• Relate your findings to earlier work in the same

area (if you can)

• Explore the theoritical and practical implications

of your findings

Discussion



• Explain whether the data support your

hypothesis

You should begin this part of discussion by

explicitly stating the relationships or

correlations your data indicate between the

independent and dependent variables.

Example

Discussion

• If you tested solubility at various temperatures,

you could start this section by noting that the rate

of solubility increased as the temperature

increased.If your initial hypothesis surmised that

temperature change would not affect

solubility,you would then say something like:

” The hypothesis that temperature change would

not affect solubility was not supported by the

data”

Discussion



• Make sure you are very explicit about the

relationship between the evidence and the

conclusions you draw from it.

• Tell your readers exactly how you got from

point A (was the hypothesis supported) to

point B (yes or no)

• You should defend your claim !

Discusion

• Occasionally it is appropriate to introduce new

data in the discussion section.Give this only as a

description of unpublished results, and make it

very clear that `s only a preliminary evidence.This

should not be used as a means to publish your new

materials, and should only be included to make a

point,perhaps confirming your major conclusions

or to show the direction your work is going.

Discussion



• Abstract >>> Past tense

• Theory >>> Past tense

• Methods & Materials >>> Past tense

• Discussion >>> Alternates! :

Discussion

Past tense Present tense

Your current results Results of previous

studies that are well-

Other studies that are known and confirmed

preliminary or cast

into doubt by your Interpretation of your

studies results

Discussion

• Example:

The neuroprotective mechanism of riluzole is not

fully understood.Riluzole inhibits glutamate

release from presynaptic nerve terminals (Martine

et al.,1993).In the present study , riluzole inhibited

the sodium channels; sodium channels mediate a

number of functions wihin the CNS,including

apoptosis. This may be consistent with the recent

finding that riluzole inhibited apoptosis in the

CNS of the transgenic mouse model of ALS

(Garney et al ., 1999)

Discussion



• Last paragraph

- Draw conclusion

- Mention to theoritical implications

- Mention to practical implications

- Extend your findings to other species

- Point to broader topics and need to further

researches

- Show that you`ll continue research on it

Some advices



• Emphasize the new and important aspects of the

study

• Compare and contrast the results with other

relevant studies

• State the limitation of study

• If your method is new and strange,explain more

and try to defend it

• In randomized clinical trials mention to:

- sources of potential bias

- imprecisions

- dangers associated with multiplicity of analysis

Some advices(continued)

• Be sure that all conclusions are supported by

results(give evidence for each conclusion)

• Make it clear that are major hypotheses in the field

supported by your research or contradicted?

• Although there may be some repetition of

information in the results and discussion section, it

should kept to minimum

• Point out any exception or any lack of correlation

• Discussion is often far too long

Don`t…!

1) Don`t write an unabridged and long

criticism on previous researches

2) Avoid making statements on economic

benefits and costs unless their manuscript

includes the appropriate economic data and

analysis

3) Avoid claiming priority and alluding to

work that has not been completed

Don`t…!(continued)

3) Don`t omit other previous good evidences to show

your study is unique …don`t magnify it!

4) Don`t explain the concepts more than what is

necessary

5) Discussion part is not for review of literature

6) Don`t be shy! Discuss the theoritical implications

& practical applications of your work

Don`t…!(continued)

7) Don`t hide unexpected results…they`re useful

8) Keep the discussion to the results,don`t go beyond

data

9) Don`t ignore or bury the major issue

10) don`t over generalize

11) Don`t ignore deviations in your data

12) Avoid speculation that can`t be tested in the

foreseeable future

Don`t…!(continued)

13) Be direct; avoid qualifying phrases such as “it

appears that…” or “our data suggest that…”

14) Labs are not as practical tests of undeniable

scientific truths, so don`t say that the hypothesis

was “proved” or “disproved” or that it was

“correct” or “incorrect”.

words like “supported”, “indicated” and

“suggested” are more acceptable ways to evaluate

your hypothesis

References

1.Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to

biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical

publication 2003

2.How to write a paper (BMJ) ,

George M Hall

3.How to write and publish papers in the medical sciences ,

Edward J Huth

4.Writing research papers

Paul Stapleton

5.Rules of thumb for writing research article

6.Style points for scientific writing

References

7.CONSORT

8.Writing up research online

Language center

9.Academic writing : Scientific report (writer`s handbook)

10.Writing a scientific paper

Georgian court college

11.Writing and publishing research articles

University of North Dakota

12.Basic composition of a biomedical research paper

Inter-Biotec

13.Writing scientific research report

The writing center

A smile is the shortest

distance between

human-beings


Related docs
Other docs by HC111123013553
TRACT
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
HUDVET_MT
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
WEST BENGAL PROFILE
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
13_Advent_Wreath_Prayer_Ce
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
BASE DRCL
Views: 70  |  Downloads: 0
Sheet1
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
fhb0787/1
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
No Slide Title
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Designing and Using Classes
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!