Embed
Email

Variable Rate Application

Document Sample

Shared by: hedongchenchen
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/20/2011
language:
English
pages:
44
Variable Rate

Application





BAE 4213

April 6, 2007

Randy Taylor, Bio & Ag Engineering

VRN - The Holy Grail?

Introduction

 Variable-Rate Application (VRA)

 Variable-Rate Technology (VRT)

 Site-Specific Crop Management

(SSCM)

 VRA is one aspect of SSCM

Variable Rate Application

Production inputs are applied on an

optimum basis for the local

conditions.

VRA requires

Knowledge of optimum rates

Ability to apply desired rate

Implementing VRA

 Map-Based VRA

 Sensor-Based VRA

 The primary element of either

approach is a rate controller

Map-Based VRA

 Uses a georeferenced map as a

guideline for adjusting application

rate

 Need a means for determining

machine location

 Need to “Look Ahead”

 Rate is based on a user-defined and

monitored algorithm

Sensor-Based VRA

 Application rate is determined from

sensors

 Rate is based on an algorithm that

ties the sensor reading to a

prescription

 Machine location is not that important

(unless collecting data)

Feedback Loop Rate Controllers

 Adjust rate to a desired value

 Measure actual rate

 Readjust rate

 When desired rate changes, they

must be able to quickly adjust to the

new rate



Select Rate Measure Flow



Set Flow

Basic Feedback Control



Adjust outlet flow

to maintain fluid

level.

Rate Controllers

 Rate controllers were developed to account

for variation in application speed

 Nebraska looked at application rate errors

of 61 NH3 applicators

 Traditional Regulator Systems

 17% of had acceptable error

 32% over applied

 41% under applied

 Electronic or Ground Drive Controllers

 59% of had acceptable error

 41% over applied

Back To Basics

 Application Rate is a

function of speed, width,

and flow rate

 Does width change?

 To keep application rate

constant, flow rate must

change when speed

changes Liquid Application

GPM  5940

GPA 

MPH  width

So How do we Control Flow?

 It depends on the metering method

 Orifice metering – pressure increase

 Valve metering – ground driven,

pressure based

 Before we get too deep into how, let’s

consider what we need.

Controller Components

 Speed Sensor

 Radar, Sonar, Proximity, GPS

 Flow Sensor

 Turbines (small impeller)

 Pressure Sensor

 Used to predict flow based on orifice size

 Control Valve

 Ball or butterfly flow control

 Microprocessor

 Brains of the outfit

Electronic Monitor System for NH3

What is the Goal?

 Apply the desired amount of product

 Account for changes in speed

 Wheel slip

 Turns

 Account for desired rate changes

Raven 440 – NH3 Controller



1.5 s of response time.

About 9 ft at 4 mph







5 mph 3 mph

Response Times

 PAMI Evaluation Report 723 – NH3

Controllers

 About 2 seconds to adjust to speed or

rate changes

 At 5 mph, 2 s => 15 ft

 At 15 mph, 2 s => 44 ft

 So we can typically change rates with

more resolution than applicator width

Raven 440 – NH3 Flow Limitations







35 ft width

5 mph

Ground Driven Pumps

 Variable stroke piston pump (PD)

 Pump speed is tied to ground speed

 Change rates by adjusting stroke or

speed

 Must have liquid to meter (for NH3)

 Drive wheel should not be allowed to

slip

Flow Control



Mixture Tank Flow Control

Valve

Flowmeter

Pump







Console Spray Boom

Radar

Flow Control

 Used with tank mix

 Automatic adjustment for speed

 Rate changes from console

Flow Control

 Advantages

 Consistent application rate regardless of

speed

 Wider speed range of operation

 Easier calibration

 Chemical savings greater than controller

cost

Flow Controller

 Disadvantages

 Cost $1500-2000

 Require radar for most accurate

operation

 With fixed nozzles, majority of flow

range required for speed changes.

Flow Control

 Application rate of active ingredient is

controlled by measuring the flow of a

tank mix. Pressure at nozzle varies.









Status: suitable but not optimum

for Prec. Agric.

Orifice Metering

50 100



40 80









Pressure, psi

Flow, gpm









30 60



20 40

2

10

Q20



0 p 0

20  pr



5 10

Speed, mph

15

 Qr 

Flow Pressure

Potential Road Blocks

 Flow Limitations

 Orifice metering is pressure limited

 Quadruple the pressure to double the

flow

 Potential Solutions

 VariTargetTM Nozzles

 Variable Rate TurboDrop®

 Synchro PWM

VariTargetTM Nozzle



Variable

Orifice

VariTargetTM Nozzle - Operation

VeriTargetTM Flow Data

1.6



1.4

They claim a

1.2 10x flow rate

change with a

Nozzle Flow, GPM









1.0

6.7x pressure

0.8 change.

0.6

Data collected

0.4 by OSU BAE

Mfg. Data students seem

0.2

Student Data similar to mfg.

0.0 data.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Pressure, psi

VeriTargetTM Nozzle Flow

1.2





1.0 Flow data from

three individual

Nozzle Flow, GPM









0.8

VeriTargetTM

0.6

nozzles collected

by OSU BAE

0.4 students.



0.2





0.0

20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Pressure, psi

Should be

released soon.

Double the

pressure, double

the flow rate.

Synchro Controller Components

What PWM Does

 Allows control of both nozzle

pressure and flow

independently

 Increases the effective

operating range by a factor

of 4 (8:1 versus 2:1)

 Increased control of spray

particle droplet size

 Even coverage using blended

pulse technology

What is the Duty Cycle?

 Pulse Width Modulation

 Nozzles on time and off time per second

 The Aim Command System changes the

amount of “on time” each second to control

nozzle flow (application rate)

Duty Cycle and Flow Control





LONG ON TIME = HIGH FLOW RATE









SHORT ON TIME = LOW FLOW RATE

Blended Pulse Coverage

 Nozzles pulse 10 times per second

 Even and odd nozzles are alternately

fired for blended coverage

Direct Injection System

Direct Injection Controller

 Active ingredient (AI) and carrier fluid

in separate tanks

 Flow rate of AI and carrier

independently controlled

Direct Injection Controller

 Advantages

 Same as flow control

 No mixing of chemicals

 Minimize disposal and rinsing problems

 Quickly change chemical or rate

Direct Injection Controller

 Disadvantages

 Greater cost ($6-8k - 1st AI tank, $1-2k

- additional tanks)

 More complex operation

 Lag time too great for real time sensing

and control

Direct Injection Controller

 Application rate of the active

ingredient is determined by pumping

the unmixed chemical into the carrier

fluid. Pressure at nozzles varies.









Status: suitable for Prec. Agric.

Variable Rate Application

Production inputs are applied on an

optimum basis for the local

conditions.

VRA requires

Knowledge of economic optimum rates

at chosen management scale

Ability to apply desired rate at desired

scale



Related docs
Other docs by hedongchenchen
June 1_ 2009
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Student Learning and Effective Teaching
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
Sheet1 - for IEEE 802
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
JADUAL WAKTU SEMESTER PENDEK 2011
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
2009-05-17_Menton
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
MIS Implants hosts global meeting
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Drainage Culverts and Ditches
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Data Watch
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
wr_promelt_specification_product-en
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!