Embed
Email

Judicial Review

Document Sample
Judicial Review
Shared by: HC111118184817
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
11/18/2011
language:
English
pages:
37
Judicial Review



"The rules governing judicial review

have no more substance at the core

than a seedless grape."

Key Questions



 When can the court substitute its judgment for the

agency's judgment?

 How much does the court defer to the agency's

decision?

 Why is some level of deference to the agency

critical to agency function?





2

Review of Rulemaking and Formal APA

Proceedings



 APA § 706. Scope of review

 http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/Courses/study_aids/adl

aw/706.htm









3

Questions of Law



 What are the different types of questions of law?

 Why are these essentially facial challenges?

 Is the agency more expert in law than the court?









4

Deference - National Labor Relations Board v.

Hearst Publications, Inc., 322 U.S. 111 (1944)



 Undoubtedly questions of statutory interpretation,

especially when arising in the first instance in judicial

proceedings, are for the courts to resolve, giving

appropriate weight to the judgment of those whose

special duty is to administer the questioned statute. But

where the question is one of specific application of a

broad statutory term in a proceeding in which the agency

administering the statute must determine it initially, the

reviewing court's function is limited. . . . [T]he Board's

determination that specified persons are 'employees'

under this Act is to be accepted if it has 'warrant in the

record' and a reasonable basis in law.

5

Persuasion - Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323

U.S. 134, 140 (1944)

 We consider that the rulings, interpretations and opinions

of the Administrator under this Act, while not controlling

upon the courts by reason of their authority, do

constitute a body of experience and informed judgment

to which courts and litigants may properly resort for

guidance. The weight of such a judgment in a particular

case will depend upon the thoroughness evident in its

consideration, the validity of its reasoning, its

consistency with earlier and later pronouncements, and

all those factors which give it power to persuade, if

lacking power to control.

6

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources

Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984)



 Clean Air Act Case

 EPA wanted to consider all of the sources of

pollution within a given chemical plant as one

source - the bubble model

 What would be the advantage of this for EPA?



 Why would environmentalists oppose it?



 The statute did not give clear guidance

 What should the court do?

7

Chevron Step One



 If the statute speaks clearly to the point, then you

have to follow the statute

 This assumes that the statute is constitutional









8

Chevron Step Two



 If the statute is silent or ambiguous

 a court may not substitute its own construction



of a statutory provision for a reasonable

interpretation made by the administrator of an

agency









9

What does it Mean to Be Silent or

Ambiguous?



 Do you just look at the statute itself?

 Scalia, usually.



 Do you include legislative intent?

 Breyer, usually.









10

Political Control of Agencies



 How does Chevron deference fit with the political

control of agencies?

 Is this a liberal/conservative view?









11

Miller v. AT&T Corp., 250 F.3d 820 (4th Cir.

2001)



 The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) does

not define medical treatment

 The agency finds that visits to the doctor that



do not require specific treatment are covered

by the act

 What is the ambiguity?



 Did the court accept the agency interpretation?

 Why does this decision make practical sense?

12

What Agency do you Defer to?



 While many agencies may have some

responsibilities under a given law, the court will

only defer to the agency with the primary

responsibility for administering the law

 Why would it be a problem to defer to more than

one agency for the same statutory provisions?

 What if the question involves the jurisdiction of

the agency?

 No clear answer

13

Food and Drug Administration v. Brown &

Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000)



 We will discussion this case separately.









14

Example - Court/Agency Conflicts in

Interpretation



 Portland wants to regulate broadband providers

 Industry says they are telecommunications providers,

thus not subject to local regulation

 Appeals Court agrees



 FCC promulgates a rule defining broadband providers as

information services, which can be regulated

 Did the Appeals Court settle this issue?



 What if the Portland case had been decided by the



United States Supreme Court?

15

Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U.S. 576

(2000)

 What did the court rule?

 “Here . . . we confront an interpretation contained in an

opinion letter, not one arrived at after, for example, a

formal adjudication or notice-and-comment

rulemaking. Interpretations such as those in opinion

letters--like interpretations contained in policy

statements, agency manuals, and enforcement

guidelines, all of which lack the force of law--do not

warrant Chevron-style deference.”

 Why is this consistent with our definition of a guidance

document?

16

When does Chevron Apply? - United

States v. Mead, 533 U.S. 218 (2001)



 Chevron was a notice and comment rule

 Why does the notice and comment process better



assure that an agency legal interpretation is sound?

 Mead is letter ruling on the classification of a product for

tariff purposes

 No notice and comment



 Can be changed at a latter date without notice and



comment

 Should this letter ruling get Chevron deference?

17

The Mead Test



 administrative implementation of a particular

statutory provision qualifies for Chevron

deference when it appears that Congress

delegated authority to the agency generally to

make rules carrying the force of law, and that the

agency interpretation claiming deference was

promulgated in the exercise of that authority.

 What would you look for to decide if Mead

applied?

18

Back to Persuasiveness? - Barnhart v.

Walton, 535 U.S. 212 (2002)



 The importance of interpretation to agency policy;

 The period that the agency has held the view;

 The legal expertise of the agency;

 The complexity of the problem;

 These modify Mead

 What can the agency due to strengthen its case

for deference?

19

Public Citizen v. U.S. Dept. of Health and

Human Services, 332 F.3d 654 (D.C. Cir. 2003)



 Is the Medicare Manual a notice and comment

regulation?

 If not, what is it?



 Does this look more like Mead or Chevron?



 Did the court find that the manual was a

regulation with the force of law?

 How can the Medicare Manual be binding on

providers if it does not have the force of law?

20

ABA Adlaw Conference 2008 - Justice

Garland, 2nd Cir, on Chevron:



 If you have an ambiguous statute, and need

Chevron deference, do not say that the

interpretation is clear and there is no other way to

construe the law. Say it is ambiguous and you are

making a reasonable interpretation based on your

knowledge of the statute and the regulatory

circumstances.



21

Interpretation of Agency Rules



 Should interpretation of rules and statutes be the

same standard?

 Are they?



 How are interpretations of rules treated



differently?

 What perverse incentives does this give the

agency?



22

Judicial Review of Facts

Scope of Judicial Review of Facts



 Congress sets scope of review, within

constitutional boundaries.

 Since the Constitution is silent on agencies,

Congress has a pretty free hand

 Congress can allow anything from a trial de novo

to no review, unless such an action runs afoul of

the constitution.





24

Trial De Novo



 You start over at the trial court

 Agency findings can be used as evidence, but

there is no deference to the agency

 FOIA

 Used more by the states than the feds







25

Independent Judgment on the Evidence



 Decide on the agency record, but do not defer to

the agency's interpretation of the record

 Sort of like appeals in LA









26

Clearly Erroneous



 Definite and firm conviction that a mistake has

been made on the facts or policy

 Same as reviewing a verdict by a trial judge

without a jury









27

Substantial Evidence - Formal

Adjudications

 706(2)(E) - only applies to formal adjudications and

formal rulemaking

 Could a reasonable person have reached the same

conclusion?

 Standard for reviewing a jury verdict or for taking a

case from the jury

 Should a jury get more or less deference than an

agency?

 Hint - substantial means some, not a lot, when you are

the agency

28

Substantial Evidence - Informal

Adjudications and Rulemaking



 706(2)(A)

 Arbitrary and capricious or abuse of discretion

 Same assessment of reasonableness as 706(2)(E),

so the result is about the same as the substantial

evidence test used for formal proceedings

 This is the most common standard





29

Some Evidence



 Scintilla test

 The agency needs to show even less than in the

substantial evidence standard

 Only limited use









30

Facts Not Reviewable At All



 Congress can prevent certain types of judicial

review

 Compensation decisions under the Smallpox

Vaccine Compensation Act are not reviewable

 Enabling law is always reviewable unless

Congress has taken away the court's subject

matter jurisdiction



31

What if the Court thinks the Agency's

Policy Choice is Wrong?

 Should the court defer to findings which it believes are

clearly erroneous, but are supported by substantial

evidence?

 Why is this consistent with the political control of

agencies?

 When the legislature gives the agency the power, it is

also saying that it only wants agency decisions

overturned in the most serious cases

 Courts have different political views than agencies and

thus they should be esp. careful about reversing agency

decisions.

32

Agency/ALJ conflicts: Universal

Camera v. NLRB, 340 US 474 (1951)

 Employer fires chairman after he testified at an

NLRB meeting

 What did the hearing officer do?

 Believed the company and did not reinstate him



 What did the NLRB do?

 NLRB rejects the hearing officer's finding



 Reinstated the chairman with back pay





33

What is the key legal issue before the

court?



 Should the court reviewing the NLRB's action

consider the hearing officer's recommendation?

 Is the agency bound by the hearing examiner's

opinion?

 Should the court look only to the part of the

record that the agency relies on for their

decision or the record as a whole?

 Court says you have to look at the whole record,

including the ALJ's findings

34

When Are the ALJ's Findings Most

Persuasive?



 What type of rulings by an ALJ carry the most

weight with the court when there is conflict

between the ALJ and the agency?









35

ALJs v. Court Masters



 Why is the deference due an ALJ different from

the deference due a master appointed to a judge,

whose findings can only be overruled if clearly

erroneous?

 Where does the Master get the power?

 What if the agency does delegate final

decsionmaking authority to the ALJ, then wants to

change a decision?

 What about Louisiana and the Central Panel?

36

Do Chevron and Substantial Evidence

Come to the Same Result?



 Chevron is about interpretations of statutes

 Substantial evidence is about factual disputes

 What about mixed questions of law and fact?

 Does it really matter which standard we apply?









37


Related docs
Other docs by HC111118184817
annuaire 1997
Views: 47  |  Downloads: 0
Sheet 1
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 0
Agenda Setting
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
qmoe_standard
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
1984 Part 1 Study Questions
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 0
Round3
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
COURS DE GRAMMAIRE FRAN�AISE
Views: 36  |  Downloads: 0
4matonweb
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
CAEN ENCH�RES
Views: 16  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!