Discussions
Suggestions Green cards
Session 1
Suggestions
Better prioritization of drugs and risk
Separate sexual and reproductive health
Goal statement missing reference to different epidemic scenarios
Goal statements missing numerical targets
MCP
Avoid getting bogged down by UN definitions
How can we involve youth in Zimbabwe
How do you know that some of your strategies working well?
Use of media-
Do we need to move to younger ages to move into access to services without
consent?
How to measure attribution
Who is holding whom accountable?
Do YP need to be disaggregated – yes they need to but countries don’t need to
report
Rationale can only be one page
Develop the capacity of young people to play a leadership or partnership tools
Need for specific mechanisms to build linkages between interventions and
sectors
Better utilization of effective mechanisms to engage and work with young
people
Focus on 14 High prev countries
OSY is not helpful definition
Advise countries to delink age of sexual consent to age for access to medical
services
Focus on UN’s strategic role not interventions
Know epidemic, know response
Acknowledge imperfect evidence
Indentify what works well best in what context, scale, epidemic etc
Prioritization of roles need to take place
Better coordination on achieving results
Capacity to support youth led networks
Roles to be linked with actions
When speaking of UNAIDS, include co sponsors
Better joint programming at countries and regional
Providing communication on roles, actors, accountability etc
Use existing indicators instead of creating new ones
Advice to countries on how to fit existing mechanism
Questions
2/3 complex emergencies
Clarify broad age 10-24 YP? Where did this come from?
Why over generalise that all YP are at risk
Selection of current targets
Reducing punitive laws and other policy business is important for improving
access to YP but also in other priority areas?
Why so much focus on rationale
Why need vision statement
More unpacking of the assumption that ICT is a magic bullet
UNGASS needs to be disaggregated, but not in all countries
Who is holding who accountable, Govt-UN- Govt
What are the outcomes?
YP also need to be accountable How do we ensure this?
Who is the biz case audience?
Link BC’s indicators on YP to the National M and E
Gaps
Married youth are the not addressed specifically
More focus on national policies and plans to ‘get them right’
Division of Labour- creates disincentive for cooperation
Age- disaggregated data 10-14, 15-19, 20-24, F/M even finer disaggregation
Need data collected and analysed
How to turn evidence from projects into national programmes, capacity to use
evidence and scale up
Role of government is absent
Lack of consistency on legal and ethical issues
Role of govt absent
Put young people first, govt second, civil society third, bilateral donors next
Clear definitions of what words in document means
Population sites estimates for MARYP
Address of issues related to sexual diversity
HIV+Yp seems to have male face but less than 5% HIV positive
Empowerment
Group – what works and does not
Attributability
Involvement of YP
Implementation of policy
Innovative technology and strategies
Disaggregated data
Limited evidence of promising interventions
Insufficient programs for MARYP, YPLHIV, vulnerable groups
Strategic information and technical expertise
Issues of policy and political will for MARYP
Appropriate information,
Sufficient products and services for YP?
Resource allocation?
School based programs not being effective as they need to be- importance of
teacher training
Not enough political will
Not enough strategic information
Are all programs evidence based?
Goal
By 2015, reduce HIV prevalence among young men and women by ensuring each
country should have evidence based /appropriate goal for reaching young
people most at risk of HIV protection, prevention, treatment, care and support.
By 2015 reduce HIV prevalence among YP globally ____% relative to 2010
Expected outcomes
Increase condom use/access for pleasure, comfort and peace of mind
Increase # of countries for comprehensive sexual education
Legislation about access to and utilization of services
Fully operational linkages and referral of systems
By 2015, to overcome barriers to universal access to services, skills and
information for young people, particularly for the most vulnerable to HIV
o reduce prev, increase behaviour and knowledge, # of countries adopting
favourable policies
By 2015, - national response tailored to epidemic context, in all countries and
settings, supportive legislation and policies enacted and enforced
Meaningful involvement of young people, in all their diversity, and through
strengthened partnership with families and communities at least 95% of young
men and women aged 15-24 are reached with good quality sex education and
client centred sexual and reproductive health information and services
By 2015, young people need to be empowered to protect themselves from HIV
and need to be able to HIV services in a supportive environment.
By 2015, 50% of MARYP should have universal access to HIV prevention,
treatment care and support
By 2015, 1) reduce HIV prevalence among young men and women aged 15-24
globally by 25 % through ensuring that national responses are tailored to
epidemic contexts in all countries and settings; 2) at least 95% of young men and
women aged 15-24 are reached with good quality sexuality education and client-
centred sexual and reproductive health information and services; and 3)
supportive legislation and policies are enacted and enforced in 75% of countries
that creates an enabling environment. This will be achieved through the
meaningful engagement in all aspects of the response of young people, in all
their diversity, and through strengthened partnership with families and
communities.
What’s working?
Botswana and Ivory Coast
Prev decrease,
Sufficient funding from variety of funders
Community mobilization of young ppl
Program data available
Making sure the young have access to information
50% by when- UNGASS deadline
Skills, information, EE and services- is this part of education
- specific mention of country level action
- If we go to specific- is this too specific for a goal
- Feasible? Being real?
- Reduce infection through education and services? No Behaviour change?
- What kind of education?
- Not just epidemiological context, but also resources and policy
- What does “other services” mean?- transmission and acquisition
- Is education the main service
- Safe ad enabling envt is contextual
- Mention universal access and equity
- Is this outcome area for prevention only
- Cultural context, may be country context
Suggestion
- Mention of sex and sexuality
- Mention appropriate services
- ‘improving services for HIV care and treatment
- Mention country context
- Mention ‘targeted’
Group Work on what needs to be done
Did you decide definitively to exclude education?
Strategic information to feed into programmes and policy
Even in group work, young people had tokenistic opportunity