Embed
Email

PowerPoint ??????

Document Sample
PowerPoint ??????
Shared by: HC111118073449
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/17/2011
language:
English
pages:
61
Ch. 5 Cryogenic heat transfer

Conduction in solids

The principal new problems associated with conduction heat transfer at cryogenic T

are those of variable thermal properties and low-T insulation. Usual thermal

diffusion eq. can be rewritten to account for property variation. Numerical calculation

is simpler with the transformed diffusion eq.



Low temperature insulation

Superinsulation with highly polished metallic coatings as many as 150 layers.



Interfacial phenomena



Associated with both pressurization and stratification phenomena in cryogenic

vessels containing coexistent liq. and vap. phases.

Heat Conduction in Cryogenics

The strong dependence of thermal conductivity on temperature makes

it necessary to integrate the expression



T2



 k (T )dT

T1





There are two integration approaches:



1) Integral approach

2) Polynomial approach



Let’s compare these methods with the assumption of a mean thermal c

onductivity



3) Km dT

Integral Approach

T2 X2

dX

Q= -  k (T )dT /  A( x)

X1

T1









T2 T1 X2



Q  [  k (T )dT   k (T )dT ] /  dX / A( x)

0 0 X1





Q = -G(2 - 1)



X2

Where G = 1 / dX and 2 , 1 are integrals

 A( x)

X1









For uniform cross-sectional area, G = A/L =0.0001m2 / 1 m

Assume T2 = 300 K and T1 = 10 K

Integral Approach (Cont.)



Q = G (2 - 1 )





G = A/L = 0.0001 / 1





For Stainless Steel:

2 = 3000 W/m





1 = 3.6 W/m





Q = (3000-3.6)*0.0001/1 = 0.3 W

Polynomial Approach

The thermal conductivity of stainless steel can be fitted by the following

polynomial equation





k(T) = 2.0E-7 T3 – 3. 0 E-4 T2 + 1.2 E-1 T – 0.388





T2 = 5.00E-8 T4 – 1.00 E-4 T3 + 0.060 T2 - 0.388T + C T2

 k (T )dT

T1

]T1





Q = 2989 W/m *0.0001 / 1





Q = 0.299 W

Mean Thermal Conductivity Approach

16

B Conduction from 300K to 10K

14 B in a 1 m long stainless steel

rod with 0.0001 square meter

12

cross section.

10

B



8

Average conductivity of

stainless steel between 300K

6 and 10K is 7.8 W/mk



B

Stainless Steel Q = Km A dT / L

4



Q = 7.8 (0.0001) 290 / 1 W

2



B

= 0.228 W

B

0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Temperature (K)

Heat Conduction in Support Members

Conduction in support member





Q = -km As (Th – Tc) / L (1)



Since the support member must support the weight of the cryogenic

system and the imposed acceleration loads, the required cross-sectional

area for a tension member is given by



As = F fs / Sy (2)



where F is the design load on the member, fs is the safety factor desired,

and Sy is the yield strength of the support member. In substituting Eq (2)

into (1),



Q = - F fs (Th - Tc) / L (Sy / km) (3)

Heat Conduction in Support Members

Contact Conductance

Experimental data have shown that the thermal conductance of

metallic pressed contacts increases according to a simple power law

function of temperature and can be described by the relation









k (T) =  Tn



Where n typically ranges from 0.75 to 2.5

Thermal conductance also increases asymptotically with increasing

applied force. Other contributing factors include surface finish, the

presence of oxide layer and Kaptiza resistance.

Summary of Th

ermal Contact

Literature

Thermal Contact Conductance as a fun

ction of Temperature & Applied Force

Kapitza Conductance









hk = q / Ts

Phonon Radiation Limit



Treats Phonon radiation as Photon radiation



qphonon=[(T+T)4 – T4]



qphonon=4T3 T [1 + (3/2) T/T + (T/T)2 + (T/T)3/4]



For small T



hPk = 4  T3



where  = 4/10 h (kB/D)2 (3N/4  V)2/3

Acoustic Mismatch Theory



Analogous to classical acoustics or bound

ary scattering in optics.



It accounts for the finite reflection at the b

oundary between the two media.



hAk = (16 4 /5) R F L cL T3 / M D3



where F is a constant, R is the gas consta

nt, L and cL are density and sound speed

of the liquid

Comparison Between Theory and Experimental Data

Heat Transfer in Single Phase

Cryogenic Fluids

Heat Transfer in Fluid Flow



• With the exception of heat transfer in He II, conve

ctive heat transfer in cryogenic fluids is not much

different than that for room temperature fluids.



• However, care must be taken to ensure the correla

tion is valid for the flow conditions being examine

d and that the fluid properties are evaluated at the

pressure and temperature of the cryogenic fluid

Near Critical Fluid Properties

% Near critical region



Flows with large property variation.

For H2, as the fluid state approaches the critical state, the ratio of the heat transfer

coefficients increases sharply.

Forced-convection processes





In general, usual other correlations

are o.k., but near the critical point, it is

difficult to use those correlations

because of great variations in cp, mu,

k, rho, beta.

% Transition flow



A flow region in which the characteristics of both

laminar and turbulent flow coexist.

There is also a tendency for instability in the flow

pattern.

Very little is known about this flow regime and

no really satisfactory method or correlation

exists for computing its heat transfer

coefficients.

A residual L/D_e influence is observed that is

greatest at the lower range of Re # and

gradually diminishes at higher Re #. ---> Use

McAdams empirical correlation data figure.



Reduced Re # case of heat transfer case.

Heat Transfer in Forced Convection



• Liquid Flow: heat transfer to a turbulent, fully deve

loped cryogenic liquid follows the Dittus-Boelter c

orrelation



Nu = 0.023 Ref4/5Prf2/5



• Gas Flow: heat transfer to a turbulent, fully develo

ped gas



Nu = 0.023 Reb4/5Prb2/5 (Tw/Tb)-0.57-(1.59/x/D)

Heat Transfer in Fluid Flow (Cont.)



Near Critical Point: Fluid properties can vary signifi

cantly near the critical point



For oxygen and carbon dioxide-

Nu = 0.023 Ref4/5Pr(min)f,b2/5



For hydrogen

Nu = 0.0208 Ref4/5Prf2/5[1+0.0146(w/ b)]

Heat Transfer in Natural Convection



Laminar Convection



Nu = Cl Ra1/4



Turbulent Convection



Nu = Ct Ra1/3

Natural convection processes



Nu = f (Ra_n)



Usual non-cryogenic heat transfer relations are satisfactory, even during the orbital flight

test, for LOX and LH2, a low-gravity (a/g as low as 8 x 10e-4) environment.







Pressurized-discharge processes for cryogens



(a) pressurization, including the calculation of the transient T, velocity, and concentration

profiles in the gas space and the flow rate and quantity of pressurant

(b) liquid stratification, including the calculation of transient T, velocity, and concentration

distribution in the liquid

(c) interfacial phenomena, including the study and prediction of mass and heat transfer

rates across gas-liquid and gas-solid interfaces

Should the vehicle design be altered by reversing the relative positions of the LOX and

fuel tanks, a higher pressure would be required in the LOX to supply sufficient suction

head of the turbopumps.

The importance of the

pressurizing system to

flight vehicle weight ; For a

Saturn V S1C stage LOX

tank pressure of about 22

psia at engine cutoff, the

mass of pressurant

remaining in the LOX tank

would be approximately

4500 lb.

Heat Transfer in Vent and Fill Lines



Acoustic Refrigerator

Tc Pump Heat Th







Thermoacoustic Oscillation

Tc Pump Heat

Th

Thermoacoustic Oscillation

Diaphragm

Small

Chamber



Small

Diameter

Tube



Liquid

Helium

Container









Liquid Helium

Thermoacoustic Oscillation (Cont.)





• Lord Rayleigh provided a qualitative explanation fo

r the heat-driven oscillation based on a critical val

ue known as the Rayleigh’s number a few 100 yea

rs ago.

• Nikolaus Rott derived the wave equation and ener

gy equation (stability criteria for helium gas) along

a temperature gradient in a channel (1960’s).

• Gu and Timmerhaus derived the stability criteria fo

r triple point hydrogen (1991).

• Yuan and Spradley determined the stability criteria

for neon gas (1992).

Thermoacoustic Oscillation (Cont.)



Three gas properties are important in determining th

e stability criterion of TAO



1) Heat capacity ratio  = cp / cv



2) Prandtl Number Pr =  cp / k =  / (1.77  - 0.4

5)



3) Exponent of temperature power law for viscosity,





where  = a T1 - 

Thermoacoustic Oscillation Experiment

Thermoacoustic Oscillation Stability

Remedies for Thermoacoustic Oscillatio

n

1) TAO

Damper









3) Porous

Damper 2) Perforated

tube

Thermoacoustic Driven Orifice Pulse Tu

be Refrigerator

Effectiveness of Heat Exchangers



Recuperative HX:

 = actual heat transfer / max. heat transfer

= Ch(Thi-Tho) / Cmin(Thi-Tci) = Cc(Tco-Tci) / Cmin(Thi-Tci)

or



 = f (Ntu, Cmin, Cmax)





Regenerative HX:

 = f (Ntu, Cf, Cr)

Ineffectiveness = 1 - 

Effectiveness of Regenerators

Heat and Mass Transport in Regenerators

Heat and Mass Transport in Regenerators

Multi-Phase Heat Transfer

in Cryogenics

Multiphase heat transfer applications in

Cryogenics



• Commercial applications- vapor-compression cyc

les, heat pipes, etc.

• Industrial- LNG plants, separation processes

• Aerospace – thermal storage units, capillary pump

ed loops, liquid propellant systems, etc.

• Cooling of superconductors

Regimes of Boiling Heat Transfer

Film boiling can exist practically with

cryogenic fluids because of their low

saturation T. In fact, it is possible to have a

heat flux in film boiling greater than that of

(q/A)_max and still maintain sufficiently

low surface T to prevent melting.



In practical systems the total rate of heat

xfer from a surface in film boiling will

include an important component of

radiation because of the high surface T.

Multiphase processes : Boiling heat transfer



Pool boiling figures







Watch the critical

heat flux and

superheated T.

Cryogenic Thermal Storage Unit

(CRYOTSU)

Cryogenic Thermal Storage Unit (Cont.)

Capillary Pumped Loops

Three important generalizations from experience



(1) The interfacial T is essentially that of equil. (saturation ) conditions corresponding to

system pressure.

(2) During pressurized discharge of a liquid from a vessel both condensation and

evaporation of the cryogenic propellants at the interface are possible, but usually are not

significant factors.

(3) During self-pressurization of liq. containers, interfacial evaporation occurs and the

system pressure is governed by the vapor-pressure characteristics of the phases at the

interfacial T.







Mass transfer by condensation or

evaporation at a vapor-liquid

interface depends on the relative

rates of heat xfer from each

phase at the interface.

Interfacial evaporation may reasonably be expected in the pressurization of subcooled

LH2, whereas much larger T differences (T_vap - T_liq) are required to cause

evaporation at LN2, LOX, or water interfaces. In the latter systems condensation may

more often prevail. One of the problems associated with pressurization of cryogenic

vessels is the high rate of initial condensation of the pressurant on the internal surfaces,

including the liq-vap interface and the consequent loss in P.

The presence of an insulating material on these surfaces allows for a surface T

response time delay and a fairly rapid reevaporation of a condensed liquid layer.

(k_rho_Cp) is used to discriminate as to the suitability of insulants on whose

surface a condensed layer of liquid will have minimum residence time. The low

value of this property for styrofoam indicates the rapid surface T response that can

be expected for this material.

Stratification in cryogenic vessels





Thermal stratification of a

cryogenic liquid in a vessel

results from external heat

exchange and consequent

nonequilibrium phenomena

within the liquid. The

phenomenon of thermal

stratification is important to

propellant tank design and

operation, as it influences the

selection of venting devices,

insulation, pumps, and tank

structure, among other things.

Thermal stratification layer.

Schlieren photographs indicate

that side-wall heating produces

the greatest amount of thermal

stratification.

Radiation



The principal problem of radiation heat transfer at cryogenic T is the determination of

the radiation properties of surface. Gaseous radiation is less of a problem since most of

the substances that remain as gases at low T are not significant radiators nor absorbers.



New consideration into the treatment of radiation heat xfer in cryogenics; Effect of

condensed gases on the radiation properties of cold surfaces. Such condensate layers

build up complex systems known as cryodeposits on the cold substrate. Much of the

work to date has been for systems of H2O and CO2.



Temperature effect on emissivity ?  Homework

Helium II









Two fluid model

Kapitza conductance.

Maximum heat flux --> figures

At heat flux rates in excess of (q/A)_max

a helium II system goes over into film

boiling controlled by ordinary fluid and

thermal phenomena. Under these

conditions the superfluidity effects are

destroyed at the heated surface and are

replaced with those circumstances that

govern the natural convection of a vapor

layer in film boiling. The liquid helium II is

lifted off the surface but becomes an

effective heat sink for the vapor. Since

the greater thermal resistance resides in

the vapor film, the unusually great heat

transportability of the superfluid is no

longer effective in promoting heat xfer.


Other docs by HC111118073449
General Instructions
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Que-sais-je_Cairn-info101101
Views: 97  |  Downloads: 0
South Australian Motor Sport Act 1984
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
0543742
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
University of Alaska Anchorage
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Slide 1
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
005 $5,000 - $24,999 Equip 2010
Views: 16  |  Downloads: 0
CONTENTS
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
CONFERENCES
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!