Embed
Email

Political Parties

Document Sample
Political Parties
Shared by: HC11111806233
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/17/2011
language:
English
pages:
23
Political Parties



And Election Systems

Political Parties & Democracy

 In democracies, citizens organize their

political activity through political parties and

the election process.



 Parties develop out of our differences about

how to achieve common goals. They are a

natural product of a democratic and free

society.

Purpose of Parties

According to the text, the purpose is “to put

forward proposed leaders whom they

support for official positions in government.”



Also, parties want to have an impact on

public policy. They don’t simply want to win

office; they want to win office so that they

can affect what decisions are made.

Purpose of Parties

 Even when they lose office, parties perform

a useful role in a democracy, by organizing

the opposition and offering alternatives.







 Parties create important links between the

voter, groups & government. To succeed,

they must build consensus.

Party Functions

 1. they mobilize ordinary citizens, either to

vote or to achieve some other political goal.

 2. they recruit and socialize leaders, even in

one-party states.

 3. they provide a long-lasting sense of party

identification.

Party Functions

 4. they can provide a means for party

leaders to control rank and file members.

 5. they provide links between:

– Branches of government in a separation of

powers system.

– Levels of government in a federal system.

– Citizens and government in all systems.

Parties in Non-democracies

Functions may differ. They:

* mobilize support for the regime.

* recruit and train potential leaders.

* oversee the bureaucracy.

* spy on population (in totalitarian systems)

Not a link between the bottom and top, but a

means of social control by the top over the

bottom.

Types of Party Systems

 One-Party Authoritarian.

Government & party closely linked. No

opposition parties permitted.

 Example:

– Communist Party in North Korea



Kim Il Sung

of North

Korea

Types of Party Systems

 Dominant Party System; one-party dominates for

long periods of time. No legal ban on other

parties, but only one party has chance to win

office, and there may be informal harassment of

opposition parties.

 Examples:

– PRI in Mexico until the 1990s

– Japan until the 1990s

– Singapore

Types of Party Systems

 Two Party System. Either party has genuine

chance to win office; elections truly competitive.

Additional parties not outlawed but have serious

difficulty winning because of electoral system.

Tend to be umbrella parties; tend to be stable.

Disadvantage: Voters limited to two choices.



 Examples:

– United States, Canada, Britain, New Zealand

Types of Party Systems

 Multi-Party System. Competitive elections

with multiple parties ensure that no one

party can dominate for long. Parties tend to

be more doctrinaire and distinctive, giving

voters more choice.



By far the most common; see examples in

text.

Types of Party Systems

In Multi-party states, it’s difficult for any one

party to win a majority. Coalitions with

similar parties become necessary. But

coalition partners may resign over particular

government policies, so this system is less

stable.

Example of government instability:

Italy, from 1945 to 1995, had 44 different

coalition governments.

Example: Israeli Elections 2006

 March 2006

Election outcome:

Kadima Party

wins the most with

28 seats in the

Knesset. The new

Prime Minister Olmert

must form a coalition government.

Example: Israeli Elections 2006

Winning party: Kadima: 28 seats, centrist

Probable partners:

2. Labour: 20 seats, centre-left

Possible partners:

3. Shas: 13 seats, ultra-orthodox

4. Pensioners: 7 seats, single-issue

5. Torah Judaism: 6 seats, ultra-orthodox

6. Meretz: 4 seats, left-wing

Unlikely partners:

7. Israel Beitenu: 12 seats, Russian emigres, far-right

8. Likud: 11 seats, right-wing

9. Arab parties: 10 seats

10. National Union/Religious: 9 seats, far-right, settlers

Elections & parties

 Grigsby: “Election strategies are influenced

heavily by election rules concerning the

counting of votes.”

 Election rules include: how votes are

counted; if some seats are set aside for

certain groups of voters, if any consideration

is given to a candidate who places a close

second.

 The rules determine the party system.

Types of Election Systems

Single Member Plurality (SMP)

The candidate who wins a plurality of the

vote prevails; a majority is not needed. Only

one seat per district. No way for voters to

designate their 2nd choice. Tends to

produce a two-party system unless a small

party’s voters are concentrated in a district.



 Used in the U.S., Canada, India, Britain,

New Zealand, Germany.

Major U.S. Political Parties



 Republican National Party

– http://www.rnc.org/





 Democratic National Party

– http://www.democrats.org/

Minor U.S. Political Parties

Scores of minor parties, among them:

 Green Party

– http://www.gp.org/

 Democratic Socialists of America

– http://www.dsausa.org/dsa.html

 Libertarian Party

– http://www.lp.org/

Minor U.S. Political Parties

Chance of winning statewide or national

office low. Why?



SMP system

Electoral College

Presidential candidates must win 270 electors

(out of 538) to win office.

Example: Ross Perot & Reform Party in 1992 won

19% of the popular vote but not one elector.

Multi-Party Election Systems

 Proportional Representation (PR).

Each district has multiple seats. Each

political party wins the same proportion of

seats as the vote it wins.

Favors the development of multiple political

parties.

Sample

ballot if

we used

PR for

Congress

Multi-Party Election Systems -

Example

Assume the following vote distribution in

a district with 10 parliamentary seats:



Quisenberry Party wins 50%

Wiggins Party wins 30%

Baker Party wins 20%



How many seats does each party win?

Multi-Party Election Systems -

Example

Wiggins Party wins 50%

Quisenberry Party wins 30%

Baker Party wins 20%



SO:

Wigginistas gain 5 seats

Quisenberries win 3 seats

Bakerites gain 2 seats


Related docs
Other docs by HC11111806233
fhj0027/1
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
MV CONTROLLER
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
deptid
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CITY OF TULSA BID SUMMARY
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
OCR Document
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ElectroMagnetic Induction
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
1299
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 0
College-Prep Reading List
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Germany
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
Modern Physics
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!