The performance of schools in the September 2011 Licensure Examination for Teachers - A. T. E. P. (Elementary
Level) in alphabetical order as per R.A. 8981 otherwise known as PRC Modernization Act of 2000 Section 7(m) "To
monitor the performance of schools in licensure examinations and publish the results thereof in a newspaper of
national circulation" is as follows:
PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOLS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER
FIRST TIMERS REPEATERS OVERALL PERFORMANCE
SCHOOL PASSED FAILED TOTAL % PASSED FAILED TOTAL % PASSED FAILED TOTAL %
PASSED PASSED PASSED
ANTONIO R. PACHECO COLLEGE,
INC 0 0 0 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00%
BASILAN STATE COLLEGE
0 0 0 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00%
CEBU NORMAL UNIVERSITY
(CEBU STATE COLLEGE) 0 0 0 0.00% 0 13 13 0.00% 0 13 13 0.00%
JAMIATU MUSLIM MINDANAO
0 0 0 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00%
JAMIATUL PHILIPPINE AL-ISLAMIC
0 0 0 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00%
MINDANAO ISLAMIC COMPUTER
COLLEGE 0 0 0 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00%
MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY-
GEN. SANTOS CITY 0 0 0 0.00% 0 11 11 0.00% 0 11 11 0.00%
MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY-
ILIGAN INSTITUTE OF 1 1 2 50.00% 1 66 67 1.49% 2 67 69 2.90%
TECHNOLOGY
MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY-
MARAWI CITY 0 0 0 0.00% 0 15 15 0.00% 0 15 15 0.00%
MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY-
TAWI-TAWI 0 1 1 0.00% 0 6 6 0.00% 0 7 7 0.00%
NOTRE DAME UNIVERSITY
0 1 1 0.00% 1 16 17 5.88% 1 17 18 5.56%
PALAWAN STATE UNIVERSITY-P.
PRINCESA 0 3 3 0.00% 0 9 9 0.00% 0 12 12 0.00%
PHILIPPINE NORMAL UNIVERSITY-
AGUSAN 0 0 0 0.00% 0 11 11 0.00% 0 11 11 0.00%
SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE
0 0 0 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00%
UNIVERSITY OF MINDANAO-
TAGUM 0 0 0 0.00% 1 2 3 33.33% 1 2 3 33.33%
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHEASTERN
PHILIPPINES-DAVAO CITY 0 0 0 0.00% 1 16 17 5.88% 1 16 17 5.88%
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN
MINDANAO-KABACAN 0 0 0 0.00% 0 11 11 0.00% 0 11 11 0.00%
UNIVERSITY OF THE VISAYAS-
CEBU CITY 0 0 0 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00%
WEST VISAYAS STATE
UNIVERSITY-LA PAZ 0 0 0 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00% 0 1 1 0.00%
WESTERN MINDANAO STATE U-
ZAMBOANGA CITY 1 3 4 25.00% 0 17 17 0.00% 1 20 21 4.76%
Any discrepancy in the report is not intentional on the part of the Commission, but rather due to to miscoding of
school codes by the examinees themselves. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.