Names

Sl.No Name of the individual Place of working



1 2 3

1 N.Annapurna West Godavari

2 L. Ajay Kumar Srikakulam

3 A.V.S.R. Anjaneyulu Head Office

4 Y.U.Bhaskar Rao Head Office

5 B. Chandra Sekharaiah Guntur

6 Ch. Durga Prasad Head Office

7 N.Gopal Rao Head Office

8 M.Gangaram Adilabad

9 P.Harishankar Rao Kurnool

10 B. Jagga Rao Visakhapatnam

11 S.V.Kameshwari Mahabub Nagar

12 A.Khader Basha Kadapa

13 K.Kumar Ram babu Head Office

14 N.Lakshmi Kantham Hyderabad

15 N.Mohan Rao West Godavari

16 V.V.R. Murthy Nalgonda

17 B. Mohan Rao Srikakulam

18 F.B.Morris Vizianagaram

19 C.Narayan Reddy Medak

20 P.R.Narasinga Rao Medak

21 A.Narsinga Rao Head Office

22 N. Nagadatta Head Office

23 V.V.L.D Prasad West Godavari

24 Ch.Pratap Rao Head Office

25 K.Prabhakar Nalgonda

26 K.V.J. Prasad Srikakulam

27 V.S.S. Prasad Nalgonda

28 K. Prasad Kadapa

29 G.Ravi Kumar Kurnool

30 M.Rama Murthy Khammam

31 N. Ramesh Kumar East Godavari

32 K.V. Ramna Murthy Head Office

33 T.Sri Ramulu Kadapa

34 Md.S.Shareef East Godavari

35 A.Suresh Babu Head Office

36 M.Srinivas Prasad Head Office

37 D.Sarojini Devi Ranga Reddy

38 K.Sai Durga Prasad Rao Visakhapatnam

39 P.Satya Narayana Head Office

40 P.V. Sagar Ragiv Swagruha Corp.

41 K.D.Srinivasa Rao Guntur

42 K.Venkateswar Rao Head Office

OBJECTIONS RECEIVED ON PROVISIONAL SENIORITY LIST OF JR.ASSISTANTs, TYPISTs, JR.STENOs (1994) AND REMARKS





Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

1. Y.U. Bhaskara Rao The individual has submitted that Corporation has already communicated state wide final Seniority of Sr. Assistants during the year 1998

2. A.Suresh Babu vide proceedings 1st cited basing on the objections raised by many of the employees. In accordance to the Seniority list approved and

3. D.Sarojini Devi communicated, he was also promoted to the category of Assistant Manager during May 2000 and again to the category of Manager from

4. M. Srinivas Prasad Assistant Manager during April 2006. As on date they have already completed (3) years of service as Manager and at this juncture again

N.Anna Purna communicating Seniority list in the category of Sr. Assistant after a gap of (11) years is highly objectionable and not tenable.

5. N. Mohan Rao

6. L.Ajay Kumar

S.V.Kameswari

7. N. Lakshmi Kantham As gone through the Seniority list they have observed that the seniority fixed to the following 92) employees of Visakhapatnam District in

8. M.Ganga Ram the category of Sr. Assistant is highly objectionable and depriving of legitimate rights.

1. Sri. P. R. Narasinga Rao 2. Sri. K. Kumar Ram babu.

A.Narasinga Rao

9.

The said two employees were initally appointed in the Corporation as Junior Assistants on daily wages and were regularized with effect

10. from 01.01.1985 in terms of G.O.Ms No. 217 SW(N) Department, Dated : 31.12.1984. At District level they were extended temporary



11 time scale irregularly even before issue of regularization orders by the Govt., The matter was also examined at Head Office and felt that

since the orders issued at District level are not covered by any Government Order the regularization of the said two employees was

considered with effect from 01.01.1985 on par with all temporary employees working in APSHCL at that time. In the final Seniority list

they should be fixed at appropriate place among the employees regularized in terms of G.O., duly considering their initial date of entry

into the Corporation for arriving final Seniority. The said issue were also examined at Head Office while finalizing seniority during the

year 1998.

and accordingly their seniority was fixed at appropriate place and communicated to all the individuals. To rectify the anomaly the H.O

while finalizing seniority has also extended notional seniority to 24 senior employees on par with Sri. K. Kumar Rambabu. The said two

individuals has also not filed any objection and accepted the final list of seniority of Sr. Assistants was again communicated in the year

1998. To my utter dismay with out any reference to the finalized list Seniority of Sr. Assistants, provisional Seniority list of Sr. Assistants

was again communicated duly fixing seniroity of Sri. P. R. Narasinga rao at Sl. No. 3 and Sri. K. Kumar Rambabu at Sl.No. 12. As per the

prevailing Govt., guidelines and rules in force their seniority should be fixed at Sl. No.20 and Sl. No. 30 as approved and communicated

in the proceedings 1st cited.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4



In this connection I submit that with reference to the proceedings 3rd cited, along with certain other employees one common objection was

filed citing the relevant facts of the case with a request to re-examine the case with relevant records and documents. Further in the final

Seniroity list of Junior Assistants communicated vide Proceedings 3rd cited, the justification for changes effected was also not indicated

in spite of our specific objcetion. The Corporation has communciated provisional seniroity list of Sr. Assistants with out properly

examining the facts and relevant guidelines.

He has requested the Management to examine the issue of the said two individuals and set right the anomaly duly fixing their seniority at

appropriate place i.e. at SL.No. (20) & (30) respectively.



12 Ch. Pratap Rao The individual has submitted that Corporation has already communicated state wide final Seniority of Sr. Assistants during the year 1998

vide proceedings 1st cited basing on the objections raised by many of the employees. In accordance to the Seniority list approved and

communicated, he was also promoted to the category of Assistant Manager during May 2000 and again to the category of Manager from

Assistant Manager during April 2006. As on date they have already completed (3) years of service as Manager and at this juncture again

communicating Seniority list in the category of Sr. Assistant after a gap of (11) years is highly objectionable and not tenable.





As gone through the Seniority list they have observed that the seniority fixed to the following 92) employees of Visakhapatnam District in



the category of Sr. Assistant is highly objectionable and depriving of legitimate rights.

1. Sri. P. R. Narasinga Rao 2. Sri. K. Kumar Ram babu.



Further he submit that he was initially appointed by the Managing Director APSHCL, Hyderabad as Junior Assistant and working in the

Corporation with effect from 28.06.1982. His services were regularized in terms of G.O.Ms. No. 217 SW(N) Department, Dated :

31.12.1984 along with the said (2) individuals. Subsequently He was promoted to the category of Sr. Assistnat at East Godavari District

vide Proceedings No. 750/85/H/Estt, Dated : 10.05.1986 of the District Collector, East Godavari district, Kakinada. At that time as per the

delgation of powers, the M.D., APSHCL is the competent authority to consider promotion to the category of Sr. Assistants.



In View of the above the District Collector, Kakinada has requested for ratification of promotion orders. The Head office has initially

issued directions for reversion to the categoryof Junior Assistants to take into consideration of such claims similarly placed in other

Districts. However on further examination and review of the matter the M.D., APSHCL vide Proceedings No. A2/7549/90, Dated :

14.12.1991 has issued orders duly restroing my senioirty in the category of Sr. Assistants with effect from 10.05.1986.

In this connection he further submit that even though the orders issued in respect of the said two individuals was not ratified by Head

Office, their seniroity was considered as per the orders issued at District level. In my case my promotion orders issued at District level

with effect from 10.05.1986 are ratified by Head Office and issed orders for restoration of my seniority. In spite of the ratification orders

he has been deprived of the same benefit as was extended to the above 92) individuals.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

13 P.R. Narasinga Rao In view of the above facts he has requested to re-examine his case and refix his seniority in the category of sr. Assistant duly taking into

consideration the date of promotion as Sr. Assistant i.e. with effect from 10.05.1986 and oblige.





1.He is submitted that in the above seniority list, his name was placed at Rank No. 3 but his date of promotion as Senior Assistant was

erroneously shown as 01-01-1987.



A copy of the Service Book enclosed herewith. His date of promotion as Senior Assistant is 16-12-1985. The same was recorded in his

Service Book by the then Dist. Manager (H), Visakhapatnam. Therefore, he requested kindly to change my date of promotion as 16-

12-1985 in the cadre of Senior Assistant in the Final Seniority List.







2. His qualification was mentioned as M.Com. But he has completed his Master degree in Business Administration (Finance ) during

1993-96 through Andhra Univerisity, Viskahapatnam. The same was recorded in his service Book. Copy of the extract is enclosed for

kind perusal. The qualification was also entered in the earlier Seniroity list of Senior Assistants published in 2003. In view of the above he

has requested that his qualification of M.B.A. may kindly be included in the Final Seniority List of Senior Assistants.







14 K.Kumar Rambabu Objection No.1 : His name was shown at Sl.No.12, duly showing his date of promotion as 01.01.1987, with a reason that many employees

were regularized as on 01.01.1985 as per GO.Ms.No.217 Dt : 31.12.1984. This is not correct in my case. According to GO. Ms.No.217,

the services of NMRs who are working as Jr. Assistants as on 30.06.1983 can be regularized with effect from 01.01.1985. But, in

his case, he was appointed as Jr. Assistant on regular time scale with effect from 01.07.1983 itself vide proceedings Rc.No.36/83

SHC Dt.16.07.1983 of the Collector/ Executive Director, APSHCL, Visakhapatnam. (copy enclosed), received







annul grade increments as on 01.07.1984 and 01.07.1985 and subsequently promoted as Senior Assistant on regular time scale



with effect from 16.12.1985 and posted in regular vacancy vide proceedings Rc. No. 83/84 (SHC) Dt. 16.12.1985 of the collector/



Executive Director, APSHCL, Visakhapatnam.(copy enclosed). the same was recorded at page No.6 of my Service Register (



Vol.1). So, his case cannot be linked with GO.Ms.No.217 to consider under 01.01.1985. Hence, his date of promotion as Senior



Assistant shall be taken as 16.12.1985 and be placed at Sl.No.3 in the proposed provisional seniority list of senior Assistants.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

In this connection, he further submit that basing on the above facts, in the year 1990, state- wide seniority list of Senior Assistants was

prepared and communicated vide reference first cited, duly following Rule 22 of AP State Housing Corporation Limited Employees

Service Rules 1989 and Rules 33 of AP State and sub-ordinate Rules, in which his name was placed at SL.No.5 (copy enclosed). But,

the same is neither finalized nor cancelled and not even shown as reference in further notices and proceedings issued by the Managing

Director.

If required, Managing Director may kindly permit me to explain the above said genuine objection in person.

Objection No.2 : He has acquired further qualification of M.A., in Eng.Litt., from Andhra University during Feb 1996 (copy

enclosed ). The same was recorded at page No.9 of my Service Register (Vol.2). Later, he has acquired further qualifications like

IRPM., BMBA., and HRD. Though he made several representation, his qualification is being shown as B.Sc.,





In view of the injustice caused to him, he humbly request the Managing Director, APSHCL, Hyderabad to consider his genuine

objections as explained above and arrange to place his name at Sl.No.3 duly showing correct qualifications in provisional seniority

list in the cadre of Senior Assistants.

A.V.S.R.Anjaneyulu He submit that the SL.Nos 3 and 12 S/Sri. P.R. Narasinga rao and Kumar Rambabu services were regularized as per G.O. Ms. No. 217

SW(N) Department Dated : 31.12.1984 in the cadre of Typist/ Junior Assistant. Prior to their regularization He was joined as typist in the

APSHCL on the forenoon of 02.07.1984 on regular time scale as per G.O. Ms.No. 168 G.A (PEMB) Department dated : 16.03.1983.

Basing on their regularization the above (2) individual names were placed below his name in the final Seniotity list of Senior Assistants

vide reference 1st cited. Further the above 92) individuals have never questioned the final Seniority list of Senior Assistants even after

lapse of 10 years time, even if my name is above to the individuals.



Further he submitted that after completion of 10 years, the Office of the M.D., again communicated the provisional Seniority List of

Senior assistants and the above individual names were kept above my name in the provisional Seniority List of Senior Assistants. It is

highly objectionable for placing their names above his name in the provisional Seniority List of Senior Assistants.





Therefore he is requested delete the above (2) names in the Final Seniority List of Senior Assistants and his name may kindly be fixed

above them in the Seniority List of Senior Assistants, in the circumstances explained in the Para No (2) above.



16. N.Gopal Rao The individual has submitted that he has been filed my objections to the provisional seniority list of Jr. Assts. duly furnishing recorded

17. K. Prabhakar evidence in support of his objections. But the objections filed by me to the provisional seniority list of Jr. Assts. are not considered and

18. V.V.R. Murthy finalized seniority of Jr. Assts. The same was communicated

19. K.Venkateswara

20. Rao

P. Harishankar Rao He represented to review and revise the seniority list of Jr. Assts, since the objections filed by him are genuine, valid and having support

21. G. Ravi Kumar of sufficient documentary evidence.

22 C. Narayan Reddy Even after furnishing sufficient documentary evidence his objections are not considered and also not given the reasons for not

considering my objections.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

In this connection he wish to submit that initially he has been appointed as Jr. Asst – Accountant – Typist on 24-07-1985 by the Dist

Collector & Exe. Director, A.P.S.H.CL. Nalgonda vide reference 2nd cited. Subsequently, I was promoted as Sr .Asst. with effect from 16-

10-1990 by the Dist Collector & Exe. Director, A.P.S.H.C.L. Nalgonda vide reference 3rd cited. Statewide provisional seniority list in the

cadre of Sr. Assts. was prepared and communicated by the Managing Director, A.P.S.H.C.L, Hyderabad, vide reference 4th cited, duly

following the rule 22 of A.P.S.H.C.L., employees Rules, 1989 and Rule 33 of A.P. State subordinate service Rules. In the provisional

seniority list of Sr. Assistant issued in the year 1990 his name was placed at S.No.32. But the provisional seniority list in the cadre of Sr.

Assts. was neither finalized nor cancelled, and not even shown as reference in the subsequent notices and proceedings issued by the

Managing Director, A.P.S.H.C.L., Hyderabad.

In this connection he has submitted that he got promotion as Sr. Assistants on 16-10-1990. In the provisional seniority list of Sr. Assts.,

communicated now his date of promotion as Sr. Asst. is shown as 01.6.1990. The actual date of promotion as Sr. Asst. in respect of all

other Senior Assts. mentioned in the provisional seniority list is also not correct.

All the 36 individuals shown have actually got promotion as Senior Assistants after 16.10.1990 on various dates as shown in the column

No.4 in his objection against each individual. Whereas he had been promoted as Senior Assistant on 16.10.1990. All those 36

individuals who got promotion as Sr. Asst. after 16.10.1190 were placed above his name in the provisional seniority list of Sr. Assts.,

without showing any ground which is highly objectionable.

While preparing the provisional seniority list of Sr. Assts. dt: 06.4.2009, the date of first appointment in the cadre of Jr. Assts. might have

been taken as criteria. As per Rule 33 of A.P. State & Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 the seniority of an employee in a particular cadre

is to

be fixed by taking the first appointment to such service, class, category or grade. But a uniform procedure is not followed to prepare the

provisional seniority list of Senior Assistants. For example Smt. D. Sarojini Devi to Smt. V. Prameela Rani (Sl.No.21 to 56 in the final

seniority of Jr. Assts.) 36 individuals services have been regularised in the cadre of Jr. Assistants w.e.f 01.01.85. But the same individuals

have been shown in the provisional seniority list of Sr. Assts. with different dates on promotion as Sr. Assistants i.e., Smt. D. Sarojini

Devi to M.S. Prasad (Sl.No.19 to 28 in provisional seniority list of Senior Assts.) were shown as Senior Assts. w.e.f 1.1.87. Sri. A.

Ramachandra Murthy to K.N. Ganesh Babu (Sl.No.29 to 35 in SA’s provisional list) were shown as S.A’s w.e.f 12.6.1989 to 24.5.1990.

Remaining 15 individuals from Sl.No.36 to 50 in provisional list of SA’s were shown as S.A’s w.e.f 01.6.1990. The reasons are not shown

for giving various dates as S.A’s to the individuals who had been working as Jr. Assts. on 01.1.1985.





The provisional Seniority List now communicated is not based on the Rules and regulations prescribed by APSHCL and Govt. from time

to time.

It seems that notional seniority has been given to some individuals, but there is no clarity in the seniority list regarding the basis taken for

fixing the notional seniority. Total 36 individuals have been placed above my name in the seniority list as discussed in the statement As

per Rule-26(d) of A.P. State and Subordinate Service Ruless, 1996 no appeal for restoration of seniority or assignment of notional

seniority on par with his junior shall be entertained by the appellate authority after a period of (90) days from the date on which junior was

promoted.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

Further he submitted that he got promotion as Senior Assistant on 16.10.1990, but the 36 individuals shown in the statement have been

promoted after 16.10.1990 to 19.9.1994. The individuals who got promotion as Senior Assistants after a period of more than three years

were shown as seniors to me. In this regard certain instructions were also issued for communication of seniroty list by the concerned

authorities. In some cases, the request is for revision of seniority in the lower



category in which the employee was appointed, one or two decades ago. The Apex Court in the judicial pronouncement in the year 1998

published in 2 SCC 523 and reported in the Hindu dated 11.7.1998 held that the request for revision of seniority after a lapse of

considerable period is not justifiable. After giving verdict by the Supreme Court of India the then M.D has issued seniority list of Senior

Assts. on 29.7.1998 giving notional seniority against to the Supreme Court directions. The seniority list of Sr. Assts. published on

29.7.1998 was challenged by me before the Hon’ble High Court. The Hon’ble High Court have set-a-side the seniority list published on

29.7.1998, directing to issue revised seniority list from the cadre of Jr. Assts. and subsequent cadres duly following the procedure, Rules

and Regulations meant for the purpose. But the provisional seniority list now issued vide ref. 10th cited is a true copy of the seniority list

published on 29.7.1998. There is no change in the notional senioritelaxation in respect of the qualification. ds to further legal

complications.

The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh in its circular Memo No.57759/Ser-A/2004-1, dt: 20.5.2004 have issued certain instructions to assign

notional seniority. The Govt. have directed that in dealing with the cases for fixing the seniority the procedure and the rules prescribed in

A.P. State and subordinate Service Rules or in Special Rules governing the post shall be followed. No request for revision of seniority for

a period which is more than (3) years old shall be considered. The seniority list in each category shall be communicated as and when the

employee completes the prescribed period of probation in the respective category





The above guide lines shall be followed to finalize the seniority in the cadre of Senior Asst. The actual date of promotion as Senior Asst.

shall be taken in to consideration for fixing the seniority besides considering the date of appointment in the feeder category. As per the

directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court and Govt. of A.P as envisaged above the individuals who got promotion in the year 1994 shall not be

considered for placing their names above my name in the seniority list of Senior Assistants, since he has been promoted as on

16.10.1990. There is a gap of (4) years after his promotion as Sr. Assistant. Hence their names shall be placed below his name in the

seniority list.

Further it is to submit that the then M.D/E.D had been particularly endorsed on the file of seniority list of Jr. Assts. in the year 1994 to

remove the names of certain persons from the list of Jr. Assts. The facts & connected records are not placed before the management.

Without removing the names of ineligible persons, the Jr. Assts. seniority was finalized. Based on impugned seniority list of Jr.

Assistants, the provisional seniority list of Senior Assistants is communicated. It is a act that as a result of judgement in W.P.No.s

34150/1998 and 36367/1998, the action has been taken for finalization of seniority right from the cadre of Jr. Asst. from 1994. As per the

directions of the Hon’ble Court, the said action of finalizing the seniority list of Jr. Assts. and subsequent cadres shall be taken up based

on the Service Rules of 1984 and subsequently issued. The APSHCL Service Rules, 1984 are very clearly indicates that the qualification

of graduation in any discipline is essential to appoint as Jr. Assts. Neither the Boad of APSHCL nor the Govt. have given relaxation

exempting to appoint the non-graduates in the post of Jr. Asst.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

If any relaxation is given to the qualification prescribed for the post of Jr. Asst., it should be in the form of orders either by the

Government or proceedings by the Board of APSHCL, duly passing amendment to the Service Rules of 1984. It is also fact that so far no

such amendments are made to the Service Rules of 1984 in respect of the minimum qualification prescribed for appointment as Jr. Asst.

Right from the year 1984 to 1998 the qualification of graduation in any discipline is insisted.





As per APSHCL Service Rules, 1984 and subsequently issued one should posses a Bachelors Degree in any discipline for appointment as

Jr. Assistant. But while preparing the seniority in the cadre of Sr. Assistants the Rule regarding possessing of prescribed qualification was

overlooked and not observed. The individuals shown below who are not possessing a Bachelors Degree was shown in the provisional

seniority list of Sr. Assistants above my name which is contrary to the rules.

Further he submitted that the Prl. Secy to Govt., Housing Dept. has conducted a review meeting on service matters on 22.12.1998. While

communicating the Minutes of the meeting held with Prl. Secretary to Govt., Housing Department on 22.12.1998 the Government have

opined that the Degree qualification was insisted upon right from the beginning for Junior Asst/Typists and equivalent posts (copy

enclosed). However the employees were regularized in the cadre of Jr. Assts. in the Districts as well as in the Head Office, in view of their

long standing right from 1983. This cannot give a right to them for promotion to the successive higher cadres.





In the beginning those Junior Assts. who were not having requisite qualification were not promoted as Sr. Assts. in the year 1991 when

the promotions were taken up. Again in the year 1994 the then Managing Director without referring the matter to the Board or to the

Government had given promotions to those Junior Assts. not having Degree qualification as Sr. Assts. The original Seniority of those

individuals was resorted in the cadre of senior Assts. The Govt. in Housing Department have clearly stated in the minutes dt: 22-12.1998

that relaxation of educational qualifications should not be given. Even if given, it should be by the competent authority Viz., the

Government on resolution by the Board”. But the above procedure was not followed. The individuals not having requisite qualification

were given chance twice both at the time of regularization of their services as Junior Assistants and again promotion to the cadre of Senior

Assistants. The Prl. Secretary to Government in Housing Department have elaxation in respect of the qualification. ds to further legal

complications.ucher and remained there unti

without insisting for Degree qualification requires review and directed to take necessary action and to furnish a report to the Government

after review of such cases. But the issue was not reviewed so far and the individuals those who are not having requisite qualification are

being continued in the list of Sr. Assts. Now the names of those individuals are included in the provisional seniority list which is highly

objectionable. A separate list of under graduates in the cadre of Sr. Assistants should be maintained as is being maintained in case of

Diploma Engineers and graduate Engineers.





These cases of Non-graduate Senior Assistants should be reviewed as desired by the Government. The individuals, who got promotion as

Sr. Assistant without relaxation of educational qualifications should not be given seniority with retrospective effect. Their seniority

should be fixed by taking the date of acquiring the requisite qualification of graduation, since they were already given chance twice as

stated above. Giving notional seniority with effect from 1.6.1990 will become another chance to them which is highly irregular and

objectionable. Hence, the seniority of Non-graduate Sr. Assistants should be taken from the actual date of acquiring minimum requisite

qualification of degree instead of giving retrospective effect and assigning notional seniority.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4



Further he submit that Sri D.P. Margarette was initially appointed as Record. Assistant on daily wages on 23.9.1983 in Visakhapatnam

District. She was promoted as Jr. Asst. with effect from 18.3.1985 and subsequently promoted as Sr. Assistant with effect from

21.6.1990. But thee is no sanctioned post of Record Assistants in District office. Her appointment as Record Assistant in District office

at Visakhapatnam is itself irregular. It is surprising to state that she was promoted as Jr. Assistant within a period of 1 ½ year from the

post of Record Assistant. As per comprehensive service rules vide G.O.Ms.No.33 dt. 26.5.1998 one should put up a minimum of (3)

three years of service as Record Assistant to get promotion as Sr. Assistant. As per new service rules her promotion as Jr. Asst. is also

irregular. Then after one should put up a minimum of 5 years service in the cadre of Jr. Asst. to get promotion as Sr. Asst. Thus the

seniority of Sri. D.P. Margaratte should be effected in September, 1991 (Septsts. Neither the Boad of APSHCL nor the Govt. have given

relaxation exempting to app

Hence placing here name at Sl.No.47 above me in the seniority list of Sr. Assistants is against the rules which is highly objectionable. In

view of the above Sri. D.P. Margarette should be placed below my name at appropriate position in the seniority list of Sr. Asst

In view of the injustice caused to me, he has requested the Managing Director, A.P.S.H.C.L., Hyderabad to kindly consider my genuine

objections. Noted below in brief.

1. To fixup Seniority at Sl.No.27 or in the appropriate place deemed fit by placing the individuals below me in the seniority list of Sr.

Asst, who got promotion as S.As., after 1.06.1990 and to whom the notional seniority was assigned without any justification. In this

regard the directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court and the circular instructions issued by Govt., of A.P (No.57759/Ser-A/2004-1 & 2, dt:

20.5.2004) may kindly be followed.

1. The original seniority resorted to the Non-Graduates should be reviewed as desired by the Prl. Secy. to the Government in Housing

Department by giving seniority in the cadre of Sr. Assts. from their actual date of acquiring the minimum requisite qualification of

graduation. In this regard the circulars, orders issued by Govt. of A.P. latest Lr.No.54737/U&IAY-A2/2005-7, dt: 09.1.2009 may kindly

be followed.

2. The seniority of Smt. D.P. Margarette and all others who had been initially appointed as Record Assts., Xerox operators and blue print

operators on NMR/daily wages basis should be reviewed with reference to Service Rules 1984 and subsequently issued since their

regularization in subsequent cadres is illegal and orbitrary.

23 M. Radha Krishna He further submitted that the District Collector such vide ref. 4th cited was pleased to submit a proposal to the Managing Director to

regularize my services with effect from 01.01.1988 as Jr. Accountant ( copy enclosed ) and on clarification of the Managing Director (H)

(copy enclosed ) the District Manager has regularized my services as Jr. Accountant in the time scale Rs. 1100-40-1500-50-2050 ( copy

enclosed ) with effect from 01.06.1990.



As required 01.01.1988 to 31.05.1990 on consolidated Salary of Rs.800/- as Jr. Accountant equivalent to Sr. Asst.

From : 01.06.1990 Jr. Accountant Time Scale Rs. 1100-40-1500-50-2050 Sr. Assistant time Scale Sr. Assistant fixation to be

made after Sl.No.35.

In view of the above submitted facts, he submit that his seniority to be fixed from 01.06.1990 instead of 31.07.1992. His seniority is to be

fixed after S.No.35 i.e. before Mrs. V.Adilaxmi.

He therefore requested to may kindly be arrange to fix up my seniority after S.No.35 in the light of the facts submitted supra.

He also request that the qualification of M.Ed. My also be ordered to be added in addition to M.Com. Stated against my name in the

seniority list (Photostat copy of M.Ed. Certificate enclosed ) for the purpose.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

24 K. Sai Dura Prasad Rao He K. Sai Durga Prasad Rao, Assistnat Manager of A.P.State Housing Coporation Ltd., Visakhapatnam respectfully, liturgy submit my

objection again as called for in the reference 1st cited. Regarding the Seniority in the cadre of Senior Assistants in the provisional

seniority list as on 1998 vide notice dated 06.04.2009.

In this connection, he humbly submit that he was appointed by the District Collector/ ED., APSHCL,Visakhapatnam as Junior Assistnat in

the time scale as on 18-04-1984. Further with regards to Seniority in the cadre of Junior Assistant he have severely submitted his

representations to the Managing Director, APSHCL, Hyderabad for justification.

The clear documentary avidence on the basis of objection raised are enclosed for ready reference as instructed. (Necessary orders of the

Housing Department letter No. dated 28-05-1999 & the Principal Secretor to the Government & proceedings of the Managing Director,

A.P.State Housing Corporation Ltd. Hyderabad vide procds No. A3/1566/99/Dt. 31-08-1999 and the service register Xerox copies

enclosed for appointment of Junior Assistant in the time sclae as on 18-04-1984.)

His date of birth is 03-02-1952 and his superannuation is February 2010. His juniors who are in the list of Junior Assistants are been

promoted as Manager earlier. Hence he once again requested to the benevolent Managing Director and invoke my prayer (claims ) may

kindly be examined in consonance on prinicipal of natural justice and facts apprised and requested for favourable consideration at this

juncture and he may be given notional seniority in the cadre of Senior Assistant 01-01-1987 on wards and accordingly my seniority may

be refixed in the cadre of Junior Assistant at seril No.8 and subsuquntly refixed accordingly., thus comes to his help at the end of his

service, for which act of kindness, he shall be ever remain grateful to you sir.





25 A. Khader Basha He submit that he was actually promoted as Senior Assistant on 10.09.1990 A.N. and my Probation in the Cadre of Senior Assistant was

declared w.e.f. 09.09.1991 and there after he was promoted as Assistant Manager on 24.06.2008 and since 25.06.2008 he has been

working as Assistant Manager. It is necesary to submit that in July, 1990, the Managing Director, A.P. State Housing Corporation Ltd.,

Hyderabad, has issued a Circular No. A2/3263/90, dt. 24.07.1990, giving instructions to all the Collectors and Executive Directors to

consider promotions of such Junior Assistants to the posts of Senior Assistants who are hard working and efficient. As he was qualified

and efficient, he was promoted as Senior Assistant on 10.09.1990 and he have been working without any break and as such he am entitled

to Seniority in the cadre of Senior Assistant w.e.f the date from which he have been working as Senior Assistant. While so in the reference

1st cited the Managing Director, APSHCL., Hyderabad, has issued a Provisional State wide Seniority List in the cadre of Senior Assistant

giving notional dates of Seniority to 52 Nos of my Juniors with dates anterior to promotion as Senior Assistant for which he filed my

objections.



He further submit that when the 52 persons of my Juniors in the cadre of Senior Assistant were promoted as Senior Assistants

subsequently to my promotion as Senior Assistant were sought to be given seniority retrospectively on the basis of a decision taken to treat

the entire State as a Single Unit, such seniority given should not effect the persons who were already promoted and they should be treated

as Seniors. As he have been promoted in my District much earlier than the above persons, he should be shown as Senior to the persons

who were promoted later. he submit that as many as 52 persons have been given seniority over and above him.





He further submit that till the year 1993, that the Presidential Order applied to the employees of Our Corporation while he was appointed

and was working in his district and the persons who were working in Head Office, Hyderabad were treated as a separate unit and

promoted int he year 1990 directly on the basis of merit i.e. hard working and efficient.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

He further submit that in the reference 2nd cited the Managing Director, APSHCL., Hyderabad, has communicated State wide Provisional

Seniority List of Senior Assistants on 06.11.1990 wherein his Seniority No. was shown at 28. And in the Proceedings 3 rd State wide Final

Seniority List of Senior Assistants has been communiated on 29.07.1998 giving Notional Seniority as per G.O.Ms. No. 354, General

Admn.(Ser.A) Dept. Dt.04.05.1990, wherein my seniority No. was shown at 89 and again in the refernce 1st cited State wide Provisional

Seniority List of Senior Assistants has been commuicated as per the Hon'ble High Court Judgment dt. 09.04.2008 in WPNo.34150/1998

and 36367/1998, wherein his seniority no. is shown at 84. In this connection, he submit that a period of more than 18 1/2 Years i.e, from

the dae of my promotion as Senior Assistant i.e, from 10.09.1990 was passed.



He further submit that in the A.P.State and Subordinate Service Rules, it is provided to submit a representation for revision of seniority

within a period of 90 days from the date of publication of seniority list. In this context, the Judicial Pronouncement, the Supreme Court of

India ruling on Seniority in Service matters published in the Hindu dt. 11.07.1998 has been reported in (1988) 2 SCC 523 held that the

request for revision of Seniority after a lapse of considerable period i snot jusifiable." Keeping this in view instructions have been issued

in the matter in the Cir. Memo No. 57759/ Ser. A/ 2004-1, and -2 dt. 20.05.2004 of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, General Administration

(Ser. A) dept. held that not to re-open the settled seniority. The Govt. direct that in dealing with the cases for fixing the seniority the

procedure and the rules prescribed in A.P. State & Subordinate Service Rules or Special Rules governing the post shall be followed. No

request for revision of seniority for a period which is more than 3 years old shall be considered. The Government Pleaders dealing with

Service Matters are requested to bring legal position as laid down by the Supreme





Court of India before A.P. Administrative Tribunal / High Court of A.P. whenever Seniority issues are taken up and oppose the cases of

revision of settled seniority based on teh Apex Court Judgment.



He further submit that in view of the facts explained above giving notional seniority to the above his juniors in the cadre of Senior

Assistants on 29.07.1998 i.e. after publishing Supreme Court of India ruling on seniority in service matter in the Hindu dated 11.07.1998

has been reported in (1998) 2 SCC 523 and after lapse of a period of nearly 8 years old up to 1998 and more than 18 1/2 years old up to as

on date from the date of his promotion as Senior Assistant i.e. from 10.09.1990, is not justifiable as it was mentioned in Cir. Memo. No.

57759/ Ser. A/ 2004-1 and -2 dt. 20.05.2004 of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, General Admn. (Ser.A) Dept. that "No request for revision

of seniority for a period which is more than 3 years old should be considered".





Hence, he has requested that the above notional seniority in the cadre of Senior Assistants may be cancelled and a fresh Seniority List may

be prepared basing on the actual date of promotion as Senior Assistants and my seniority may be fixed accordingly. For which act of

kindness he shall ever be grateful to you sir, Since the seniority i.e. the cadre of Senior Assistants published on 29.07.1998 is set - a- side

by the Hon'ble High Court in the WPNO.34150/1998 and in teh WPNo.36367/1998.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

Further he submit that he hae acquired the higher qualification of MBA (Master of Business Administration ) Course in Second Class in

December, 2007 from the Alagappa University, Karaikudi, in Tamilnadu State, with Register No. 043176751 under Distance Education

Stream. The attested copies of Statement of Marks and Provisional Certificate were also submitted to the Managing Director, A.P.State

Housing Corporation Ltd., Hyderabad,, vide in Lr. Rc. No. A/2150/2008/APSHCL/Estt, dt. 16.06.2008 of the Superintending Engineer,

APSHCL., Kadapa District, However, the attested copies of Statement of Marks, Provisional Certificate and Post Graduate Degree of

MBA are enclosed herewith for your ready reference.





Hence, he requested that the aforesaid his higher qualification i.e. MBA Course may be added against his name in the Seniority List

besides permission to the superintending Engineer, APSHCL., Kadapa, to enter the same in his Service Register.





26 P. Satyanarayana He submit that he was promoted as Senior Assistant vide Procd. No. A3/7272/96-3, dt. 08.06.1999 of the Managing Director,

A.P.S.Housing Corporation ltd., Hyderabad.

27. Ch. Durga Prasad Further he submit that he was considered notional promotion in the cadre of Senior Assistant w.e.f 31.07.1992 on par with my juniors and

28. N. Nagadatta issued orders vide Procds. No. A3/6382/2004, dt. 22.11.2005 of the Managing Director, A.P.S.Housing Corporation Ltd., Hyderabad. But

29. Md. S. Shareef my name was not shown in the provisional seniority list of Senior Assistants communicated vide reference cited.

V.V.L.D Prasad He therefore request that his name must be shown at the proper place in the seniority of list Senior Assistants duly taking into

30. K.V.Ramana consideration the date of promotion as 31.7.1992, since the provisional seniority list was prepared by the Head Office duly taking into

31 Murthy consideration the dates of notional promotion and communicated vide reference cited.





32 K. Prasad He submit that his name was in Sl. No.96. The objecions made by him was not considered. He was senior most of Smt. K. Somavathi

(Sl.No. 54). He was to be placed in Sl.No.53, as he was appointed on 08.07.1983. But Smt. Somavathi (Sl.No. 54) has appointed in the

month of October, 1983. In the seniority list shown Sl.No.89 but actually the seniority has shown Sl.No.47 as per the seniority list of

senior Assistant communicated by the M.D., Vide Procd No. A3/14293/2000, dt : 10.01.2003 the Sl.No. is 38 which was shown in Smt.

K.Somavathi name above. In view of the above place his name at Sl.No.47 in the cadre of Senior Assistant





33. B.Mohana Rao He submit that he have initially appointed as "Direct Senior Assistant" under work experience Programme duly following the Recruitment

34. K.V.J.Prasad Procedure on par with Assistant Engineers duly sponsored from the District Employment Exchange, Srikakulam on consolidated pay of

Rs. 800/- per month in proceedings No. 185/86/E/HC/dt.15.10.1986 of the District Collector, Srikakulam and his name was placed at

Sl.No. 7 in the provisional Seniority list of Senior Assistants communicated in Notice No. A2/192/90 dt. 06.11.1990 of the Managing

Director, APSHCL, Hyderabad. The above reference copies are herein appended for kind perusal.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

b) He further submit that his name was placed in the Provisional integrated Seniority list in the cadre of Jr. Assts for Senior Assistants

communicated in Notice No. A2/1050/1994 dt. 12/04/1994 of the M.D., APSHCL., Hyderabad and his name was placed at Sl.No. 99 and

mentioned as Direct Senior Assistant by noting that his date of regularization is 01.06.1990. ( The reference copy is herein appended). In

this connection, I submit that inresponse to the Notice No. A3/11728/208/dt.09.01.2009 of the M.D., APSHCL., Hyderabad and

considering his Representation, the Managing Director, APSHCL., Hyderabad has issued orders while deleting his name from the

Statewide seniority listo of Junior Assitants in Proceedings No. A3/11728/2008/Dt.01.04.2009 of the MD., APSHCL., Hyderabad since he

was initially appointed as Direct Senior Assistant.

c) Further, he submit that his services were regularized in the cadre of Senior Assistant w.e.f. 01.06.1990 in terms of G.O.Rt.No.303, dt.

09.09.2005 of the Housing Department, Govt.of A.P., Hyderabad and in proceedings No. A3/3380/05/dt. 4.7.2006 of the MD., APSHCL.,

Hyderabad. ( The reference copies are herein appended).

d) In this connection, he further submit that it is informed by the MD., APSHCL., Hyderabad in Memo No. A3/3380/2005/dt. 11.3.2008

that his name was placed at Sl.No.82/A in the Statewide Seniority list of Senior Assistants communicated in Proceedings No.

A3/14293/2003/dt.10.01.2003 interms of G.O.Rtc.No.303, Dt. 9.9.2005 of the Housing Department, Govt. of AP., Hyderabad. ( The Two

references are appended).

e) Further, he submit that he have promoted as Assistant Manager in proceedings No.A3/1457/2007/dt.24.06.2008 of the MD., APSHCL.,

Hyderabad duly considering the Seniority as Sl.No. 82/A and at present he is working in Srikakulam District as Assistant Manager (H). (

The reference copy is herein appended).

In this connection, he beg to submit that he have initially appointed as Senior Assistant in the sanctioned post under Work experience

Programme on par with Assistant Engineers duly sponsored from the District Employment Exchange and qualified in both written and

oral tests. The Govt. in G.O.Rt.No.99 dt. 03.04.1999 of Housing (U& IAY) Dept., Govt.of AP., Hyderabad has issued orders by

regularizing his services in the cadre of Senior Assistant in prospective manner and later, the Govt. have issued orders for regularization

of his services with effect from 01.06.1990 in G.O.Rt.No. 303, dt.9.9.2005 of the Housing Department, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh,

Hyderabad with all consequential benefits accrued thereon. The G.O. Copies are herein appended for kind perusal.





He, further submit that he have initially appointed as Direct Senior Assistant recruited by the District Collector, Srikakulam and from the

date of appointed i.e., 22.10.1986, he have discharged the duties of Senior Assistant in the sanctioned post. In this connection, it is

submitted that as seen from the provisional seniority list of Senior Assistants communicated in Rc.No.A2/192/90/dt.6.11.1990 only 33

No.of Senior Assistants were workied as Senior Assistants as on 6.11.1990 in the state and out of which his name was placed at Sl.No.7

considering my date of appointment (18.10.1986) as Direct Senior Assistant. If at all my seniorty would be considered based on my date

of regularization of his services as Direct Senior Assistant i.e., 1.06.1990, his name would have been placed at Sl.No.19/A i.e., (1) Sri L.

Ajaykumar (2) Sri p. Chandrasekhara Rao (3) Smt. D.P.Margaret (4) A.Ramachandra Murthy (5) Y. Saileela (6) V. Ganapati (7) V.

Vajrayya (8) T. Subramanya Sastry (9) N. Satyanarayana (10) P. Harisankara Rao (11) A. Khadeera basha (12) p. Sreeramulu (13) K.

Prabhakar (14) V.V.R. Murthy (15) N. Gopalarao, (16) k.Venkateswara Rao were promoted as Asst Managers/ Managers and his case was

ignored.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

He, further submit that earlier, a seniorty list of Senior Assistants communicated in Proceedings No. A3/6119/96/dt.31.1.98 of the M.D.,

APSHCL., Hyderabad and his name was placed at Sl.No.95 duly considering the date of his regularization of service as Senior Assistant

i.e., 1.6.1990 and the date of appointment as Direct Senior Asst. shown as 18.10.1986 instead of placing his name at Sl.No. 38(A) i.e.,

after Sri K. Ganesh Babu Sl.No. 37 and moreover, at about 58 No.of Senior Assistants were given Notional Seniority on par with his date

of Regularisation i.e, 01.06.1990 and placed their names on the top of his name placed even though, they were not rendered the duties in

the cadre of senior Assistant as on 1.6.1990 and ultimately made injustice to me while fixing of his seniority without following the norms

of the Govt. in fixing of Seniority without following the norms of the Govt. in fixing of Seniority to the Direct Recruitees and as such, he

put in loss of 2 promotions and consequential benefits. As a result, his juniors 1. D. Sarojinidevi Sl.No. 39 2. Sri P. V. Sagar 3. p.R.

Narasinga Rao 4. Y. Suseela 5. S.V. Kameswari 6. A. Narasing Rao 7. Y.U. Bhaskara Rao 8. M.S. Prasad 9. N. Mohan





10. B. Nagaraja Reddy. 11. M. Gangaram 12. M. Arun Kumar 13. N. Satyanarayana Rao 14. n. Hemachandra Reddy have got two

promotions and they are working as Mangers even though, they were juniors to me in the cadre of Senior Assistants. But, he have recently

promoted as Assistant Manager during June, 2008 on par with my most juniors who were not at all discharged the duties of Senior

Assistant even at the time of his date of regularization i.e., 1.6.1990.

Further, he submit that infact, his services would have been regularized on par with Assistant Engineers who were also recruited under

Work Experience Programme like me in terms of G.O.Ms.No.182, dt. 13.11.1991 with effect from 1.1.1988 and allowed monitory benefit

from 13.11.91. but, due to non submission of proposals for regularization of his services interms of G.O.Ms.No.182, dt. 13.11.1991 bythe

Managing Director, APSHCL., Hyderabad to the Govt. his case was ignored by the Govt, at that time and the same matter was also

discussed in G.O. Rt.No.99, dt. 03.04.1999 of the Housing Department, Govt.of AP., Hyderabad. As such, he put in loss of 2 years and 5

months of regular service due to non-submission of proposals to the Govt. by the MD., APSHCL., Hyderabad.





He, further submit that the Govt. in G.O.Rt.No.333, dt. 9.9.2005 of the Housing (U& IAY)Department have issued orders for

regularization of his services as Direct Senior Assistant from 1.6.1990 with all consequential benefits accrued theron and based on these

orders the M.D., APSHCL., Hyderabad has informed that his name was placed at sl.No.82/A in the State wide Seniority list of Senior

Assistants instead of placing his name at Sl.No. 25 A i.e., after sri K. Ganesh Babu who was promoted as Senior Assistant from Junior

Assistant on 24.05.1990 i.e., before the date of his regularization of service i.e., 1.6.1990 in teh statewide Seniority list of Senior

Assistants in proceedings No. A3/14293/2000/dt.10.1.2003 of the MD., APSHCL., Hyderabad.

In this connection, it is submitted that the notional seniority inrespect of Sri S. Ravindar, Karimnagar district ha been fixed as 1.6.1990

while taking the date of his regularization in the cadre of Senior Assistant and placed him at Sl.No.47 even though he was originally

promoted as Senior Assistant on 15.6.1992 and n the similar way at about 48 candidates i.e., from Sri S. Ravindar, Karimnagar to Sri P.

Jabbarkhan, Adilabad who was actually promoted as Senior Assistant on 23.2.1991 were given notional seniority and placed them in the

top of his name without giving priority to his for placing his name at the top of the above 48 candidates considering the norms of Direct

Recruitees since he have initially appointed as Direct Senior assistant by following the Recruitment procedure in the state wide seniority

list of Senior Assts. In Proceedings No. A3/14293/2000/dt. 10.1.2003 of the M.D., APSHCL., Hyderabad.

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

He, therefore, request the Hon'ble Managing director, A.P.State Housing Corporation Ltd., Hyderabad to kindly arrange to re-fix his

seniority considering his date of initial appointment in the cadre of Direct Senior Assistant i.e., 18.10.1986 and to consider his date

Regularisaton in the cadre of Direct Senior Assistant i.e., 1.06.1990 in terms of G.O. Rt. No. 303, dt. 9.9.2005 of the Housing (U & IAY )

Department, Govt. of AP., Hyderabad. He also humbly request to arrange to place his name at Sl.No.36 i.e., after Sri K.N Ganesh Babu

Sl.No.35 which is deemed to be fit as per the Norms and kindly arrange to issue orders for consequential benefits thereon since he have

put in loss of 2 promotions sofar. In this connection, he submit hereunder the Documentary Evidences in support to the above. a)

G.O.rt.No.303, dt. 9.9.2005 of the Housing (U&IAY) Department, Govt., of A.P>, Hyderabad - date of Regularisation in the cadre of

Direct Senior Assistan is 1-06-1990. b) Date of promotion from Jr. Assistant cadre to Senior Assistant of Sri K.N.Ganesh Babu is

24.05.1990. C0 Proceedings No. A3/11728/2008/dt.01.04.2009 of the Managing Director, APSHCL., Hyderabad





( Deletion of his name from the Statewide Seniority list of Jr. Assistants considering his name as Direct Senior Assistant on par with Sri

M. Arun Kumar).



d) Memo No. A3/3380/2005/dt.11.3.2008 of the Managing Director, APSHCL., Hyderabad informing that his name was placed at

Sl.No.82/B (After Sri P. Jabbarkhan Sl.No.82, Sri B. Mohana rao Sl.No. 82(A) in the Statewide Seniority list of Senior Assistants

communciated in Proceedings No. A3/14293/2003/dt.10.1.2003 interms of G.O. Rtc.No.303, Dt.9.9.2005 of the Housing Department,

Govt.of AP., Hyderabad

This is submitted for favour of kind information and he solicit favourable and early action in this matter.

35 V.S.S.Prasad He submit that he was promoted as Senior Assistant on 07.07.1994 vide procds. Rc.No. B1/1243/89, Dt: 07.07.1994 of the District

Collector, Nalgonda. Subsequently he has sanctions 8 years special grade post as on 10.07.2002 Vide Lr.Rc.No.

1204/APSHCL/AAS/F11/2005-06, dt : 26.06.06 of the ED, APSHCL., Hyderabad. He has requested to include his name the

Provisional Seniority Assistants at Sl.No. 132.

36 F.B.Morris He submit that as Jr.Assistant the date considered 18.04.1984/01.01.1985 by Govt. of A.P.Hyd., wide Lr.No.2125/U & IAY/A2/99-1,

DT.28.05.1999 and as per Notice Rc.No.A3/6877/98, Dt.07.11.2000 of the MD., APSHCL., Hyderabad.

Further he submitted that for 01.01.1985 batch of Jr. Assistants., though they were promoted as Sr.Assistants during the years

1990&1992, NOTIONAL date was given to them by the MD., APSHCL., Hyderabad.as Sr, Assistants is 01.01.1987.

He was actuall promoted as Sr.Assistant on 27.12.1989 . Regularization and probation was also declared in the Cadre of Sr.Assistant

w.e.f., 27.12.1989. but as per the proposal sent to the Govt., by the MD., APSHCL.Hyd . The date given to him as Sr. Assistant eroniously

is 01.06.1990.

Further he submit that his name should be placed between Sl.No. 16 & 17 in the cadre of Sr. Assistants by giving notional date is

01.01.1987.

37 B.Chandrasekharaiah He submit that, he joined as Office Assistant on 01.11.1983 on retrenched Employer on consolidate pay appointed by the District

Collector & Executive Director , APSHCL ., Ranga Reddy District sponsored through District Employment Exchange. Thereafter the

Managing Director, APSHCL., Hyderabad through Progs. Rc.No.A/WSHP/385/83, dt. 01.04.1985 appointed me as Junior Assistant in the

time sclae of 42-10-455-15-650 and he was appointed as Junior Assistant with effect from 01.04.1985 on Regular basis.



Later the commencement of probation in the cadre of Junior Assistant for orders by the District Collector, Ranga Reddy district on

01.04.1985 and 19.04.1987 respectively

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

Subsequently, he was promoted as Senior Assistant on 26.05.1991 as per Progs. Rc.No.A1/281/89, dt., 23.03.1991 of the Managing

Director, APSHCL., Hyderabad.

As could be verified the Seniority list commenced vide ref.cited, he was pleased at Sl.No. 54 of the Seniority list.

Since his declaration of probation in the cadre of Junior Assistant order on 19.04.1987. he would have been placed at No. 29 below. The

name of Sri M.S. Prasad who is seniority is assigned as S.No. 28.

He, therefore requested that the objections was raised above may kindly be taken in to consideration and committed orders refixing his

seniority placing him at Sl.No. 29 instead of 54

38 K.D.Srinivasa Rao He Submit that he was promoted as Senior Assistant on 07.07.1994 vide procds. Rc.No.B1/1243/89, Dt : 07.07.1994 of the District

Collector, Nalgonda. Subsequently he have already sanctioned 8 years special grade post as on 10.07.2002 vide Lr.Rc.No.

1204/APSHCL/AAS/F11/2005-06, dt.26.06.06.

He requested to include his name in the Provisional Seniority list of Senior Assistants at Sl.No. 131.

39 P.V.Sagar He submit that as seen from the final seniority list of Jr.Assts, it is revealed that case wise objections received on the communicated

provisional seniority list of Jr.Assts were not reviewed with reference to the APSHCL service rules in force.

The Govt., in G.O.Ms.No.217 SW(N) Dept., dated 21.12.1984 have issued orders for regularization of services of daily wage employees

and directed to regularize the services duly following the Service Rules of corporation strictly. As per the rules, minimum requisite

qualification to the post of Junior Assistant was "BACHELOR"S DEGREE COURSE " in respect 1. OCS - degree second division. 2.

BCS - Degree Passed and 3. SC & STs - Intermediate pass.

He was possessed B.Sc with First Division in the year 1983. Accordingly his services have been regularized in the cadre of Junior

Assistants with effect from 01.01.1985 through District Collector, R.R.District Proceedings No. A/WSHP/385/83,Dt : 10.05.1985

In view of the above , he further submit that the list of some of the candidates, who are shown at above his name were juniors and their

services were not regularized w.e.t.01.01.1985 due to not acquired requisite qualification as per the services rules. The name of those

Juniors were placed at above his name, which is highly objectionable.

Sri P.R. Narasinga rao (Sl.No. 3 ) and Smt N. Jayasri Devi (S.No.50 were unauthorized absence from duty prolonged absence without

leave have to be treated as DIES - NON.

In respect of Sri P.R. Narsinga Rao, He submit that he left the organization without prior permission and without leave for a period of

more than five years. Under FR 18 rule 5A of A.P. leave rules 1933 that Government servant who has willful absence from duty not

covered grant of any leave and treated as DIES - NON for all the purposes.

He, further bring to your kind notice that Managing Director, APSHCL, Hyd., in Lr No. 7587/APSHC/Estt/87-A dated : 08.09.1987 and

Lr. No. A2/7549/90 dated 25.02.1992 directed to the District Manager (Housing ) Ranga Reddy and Visakhapatnam for reverting the

following Senior Assistants as Junior Assistants

1.Smt N. Jayasridevi - Ranga Reddy district

2.Sri P.R. Narsing Rao - Visakhapatnam

3. Sri K.K. Ram Babu - Visakhapatnam

Sl.No Seniority Name

Gist of Objection

. No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4

And also, submit that Govt. Memo No. 9101-4/8/FR-1/91(Finance FR-1) Dept., dated 25.12.1991 and G.O.Ms.No.260 G.A (Ser- C )

Dept., Dated 04.09.2003 have issued orders that "unauthorized Absence from duty for a period of one year of an employee shall be

imposed penalty of Removal from service duly following due procedures under APCS (CC & A) Rules. In instance case deviated all the

procedures and promotion given to him in the cadre of Assistant manager and Manager and also placed his name in the seniority list at

above his name, instead of initaling disciplinary action as per APCS (CC&A) Rules.





As per the service rules for promotion to the post of Senior Assistants was "BACHELORS DEGREE WITH SECOND DIVISION AND

COMPLETION OF TWO YEARS SERVICE AS JUNIOR ASSISTANT. I possessed B.Sc, with first division and completed 2 years

service in the cadre of Junior Assistant. As per elfigibility he was promoted as senior assistant w.e.f 12.06.1989 by the District Collector,

R.R.District. based on the directions of MD., APSHCL vide Lr.No. 539/APSHC/Estt/1987-A1 dated : 30.1.1987.



Finally he has requested to examine the following points

1. Seniority of Senior Assistants to be considered based on the APSHCL service rules inforce, and eliminate the ineligible candidates from

the final seniority.

2. In respect of Sri P.R. Narsing Rao and Smt. M. Jaysri Devi, both cases be re-examined with Govt. Memo No. 9101-4/8/FR-1/91 (Fin -

FRI )Dept., dated 25.12.1991 with G.O.ms.No.260 G.A.(Ser-C-Dept., dated 04.09.2003 and also MD Lr. No. A2/7549/90 dated

25.02.1992.

3. In final seniority list above fact may be considered as per service rules and his name to be included at appropriate place at Serial No. 3

int eh final seniroity duly eliminating juniors at above my name.

4. Every time he is filling objections on the communicated seniority list. But ignoring his seniority. So please consider my request at this

point.

40 B.Jagga Rao In this provisional seniority list, Sri Y. Vasantha Rao was placed at Sl.No. 148 taking into criteria of his orginial date of joining as Junior

Assistant on 27.01.1990 as per Procgs.No.153/90-E/Dt.23.01.1990. But in the final seniority list, he was crept to Sl.No. 78 for which

facility his date of joining was revised to 02.09.1985 is totally; illegal and contrary to the directions of the Hon'ble High Court. There

might be similar anomalies were occurred in the other Districts. Hence the final seniority list of JAs is not correct and needs rectification

forthwith as per Hon'ble High Court judgement Dt. 09.04.2008 in W.P.No.34150/1998 and 36367/1998. Otherwise, his seniority has to be

revised appropriately revising his date of joining in the cadre of JAs as 18.04.1984 on par with Sri K. Sai Durga Prasada Rao (

Provisional Sl.No. 8 in the cadre of JAs). Kindly refer my objections filed in the ref.2nd cited.



May be treated as part and parcel to this objection. 1. He submit that when the date of promotion is similar to other employees, the

seriatim has to be decided / ranked taking into criteria of alphabetical order of 'surname' or ascending to descending order of date of birth'.

2. The employees of other Departments absorbed in the Corporation without issuing notice to the Corporation employees shall be ranked

below the seniority of Corporation employees. 3. His earlier objection submitted in the ref.2nd cited may kindly be referred as part and

parcel to this objection.

Further he requested to revising the date of joining in the initial cadre of Junior Assistant of 02.09.1985 as 18.04.1984 as was revised the

date of joining of Sri Y. Vasantha Rao from 27.01.1990 to 02.09.1985 though he was not actually rendered duty as Junior Assistant from

02.09.1985 to 26.01.1990.



41 P. Sree Ramulu He requested to record his additional qualification B.L. three years Degree examination passed during the year November 1996 from S.V.

University and the same was entered at Page No. 5 of his Service Register and requested to record his qualification in the seniority list of

Senior Assistant

OBJECTIONS RECEIVED ON PROVISIONAL SENIORITY LIST OF ASSISTANT MANAGER



Name

Senio

Sl. No Gist of Objection

rity No. Smt.

/ Sri.

1 2 3 4

1 16 AVSR He submit that he passed MA

Anjaneyu through Madurai Kamaraj University

lu Head during the month of April 2000. He

office received the original certificate in the

month February 2001. Soon after receipt

of original certificate requested the MD in

February 2001 for his promotion as

Asst.Manager. The Corporation addressed

to the Controller of the examination in the

March 2001 for genuineness of certificate

and genuineness certificate is also received.



Further he submited that govt.in

their Lr.No.423/RHI/99-1, dtd.10.12.1999

have clarified the case of A.Es promoted

from WI (Tech) that the person is eligible

to be considered for promotion to the

cadre of A.E only from the date of

acquisition of Diploma in Civil or

Mechanical Engineering. Further the

Government in G.O.Rt.No.52, Housing

(U&IAY) Dept., dtd.25.2.2009 has

clarified that NTWI as TWI be treated as

conversion from the date of acquiring

required technical qualification.

As per the FR 26(q) and

clarifications issue by Government in pre-

paras he had to be promoted with effect

from 22.4.2000 the day following the last

date of examination. But promotion were

given on 15.5.2000 by the Corporation.

Hence he has requested to consider his

case on par with his juniors who were

promoted on 15.5.2000

Further he submitted that in the

provisional Seniority list issued on

22.3.2005 his name was shown at

Sl.No.15 at tnat time the name of Sri P.R.

Narsing Rao not not take place in the

seniority list of A.Ms. He submitted a

representation on the said provisional

seniority list to give notional promotion

with retrospective from 15.5.2000 as he

has passed the requisite qualification in

April 2000. But his request not considered

by the MD stating that he not submitted

his educational qualification certificate at

the time of effecting promotions i.e. on

15.5.2000.

Further he submitted Sri P.R.

Narsing Rao were promoted as A.M with

effect from 24.6.2001 on notional basis by

exonerating the charge framed against

him, though he was promoted as A.M on

11.11.2005 his name was shown at Sl.No.

A4(A) above his name though he was

promoted as A.M on 17.2.2003 much

before his promotion as A.M taking into

account his notional promotion with effect

from 24.6.2001. The seniority fixed in the

lower cadre should always be maintained

for all future promotions as per rule 33 of

A.P. State & Subordinate Service Rules.

In view of the above he

requested to promote him as Assistant

Manager with effect from 15.5.2000 on

par with juniors between Sri M. Gangaram

Sl.No 8 and Smt D. Sarojini Devi Sl.No.9.



2 1 M. Arun He requested that his date or birth

Kumar may be changed as 15.08.1955 instead of

Head 15.08.1952 as already recorded in his

office service register as 15.08.1955.



3 30 D.P.Mar She has requested to fix her

gatte seniority at al.No.17 in between Sri AVSR

Visakhap Anjaneyulu, Sl.No.16 and Smt N.

atnam lakhmikantham, Sl.No.17 instead of

Sl.No.30 as her case considered as

promotion as A.M on par with 14 other

colleages with effect from 14.2.2008 vide

Proces.No.A3/2791/2006, dt.8.5.2009 as

per rule of reservation at roaster point 2

fixed for women SC candidate.









4 60 F.B. He submitted that as per the recent

Morris judgement of Madras High Court as Well

Visakhap as Supreme Court of India, the P.G.

atnam qualification acquired from 10+2 directly

with out having the minimum qualification

of degree is not at all valid. But as seen

from the provisional seniority list of A.Ms

nearly 7 employees who are actually SSC

and Intermediate qualiried persons who

acquired PG Degree directly without

having minimum qualification of degree

were placed above his name.

Further he requested to include his

B.L. degree aqualification in the seniority

list (SR copy enclosed) and also rectify his

place of work as Vizianagaram instead of

Visakhapatnam.

5 72 K.Sai He submitted that as per the recent

Durga judgement of Madras High Court as Well

Prasad as Supreme Court of India, the P.G.

Visakhap qualification acquired from 10+2 directly

atnam with out having the minimum qualification

of degree is not at all valid. But as seen

from the provisional seniority list of A.Ms

nearly 7 employees who are actually SSC

and Intermediate qualiried persons who

acquired PG Degree directly without

having minimum qualification of degree

were placed above his name and he is

going to retire from service in the Feburary

2010.

6 99 S.Md. He requested to rectiry his qualification

Khasim shown as Inter but his qualifiation is B.A

Anantapu which is altered in the final seniority list of

r Seniority Assistant



7 121 P.Satyan He submitted that he was appointed

arayana as TWI on consoldiated pay by the District

Head Collector on 17.2.1985.

Office









Further he was appointed as Jr.Asst

on daily wages vide Procds.No.2262/86-C,

dt.11.9.1986 by the DM, W.G.Dist

Further he was appointed as Sr.Asst

on consolidated pay vide

Procds.No.361/85/C, dt.3.12.1986 by the

Dist.Collector, W.G.Dist in the existing

vacancy, the District Collector was placed

in time scale of pay as Jr.Asst. with effect

from 1.1.1990 stating that three posts in

district office and one post of Sr.Assistant

in the office of the DEE (H), Kovvur were

down graded as Jr.Assistants as on

economy measure. Thus it was clear that it

was post vacant that was down graded but

not his appointment as Senior Assistant.



Further he submitted that Sri KVJ

Prasad and B. Mohan Rao of Srikakulam

was appointed on consolidated pay like

him are working as Sr.Assistants in the

district and their services were regularized

as Sr.Assistant with effect from 1.6.1990

by the DM, Srikakulam.

But his representation was not

considered and he approached the Hon'ble

High Court and High Court issued orders

in W.P.No.5754 of 1994 directing the

respondents to consider the representation

made by him and pass appropriate orders

in accordance with rules within twelve

weeks.

Vide Procds.No.Rc.No.1178/94C,

dt.12.9.1994 fo the District Collector,

W.G. District stated that the request of Sri

P. Satyanarayana, Jr.Asst claiming

seniority for Sr.Asst post is rejected and

his claim that his seniority shall be

considered for the post of Sr.Asst on the

gound that two incumbents of Srikakulam

district were regularised as Sr.Assts is not

tenable on the ground that the APSHCL,

Hyderabad has already issued isntructions

for reversion of the two incumbents of

Srikakulam district. He he is not entitled

for claiming seniority for Sr.Asst post in

accordance with the rules of the

Corporation.



Again he submitted a representation

to consider his case on par with the above

individuals with effect from 1.1.1990 as

Sr.Asst. Vide Memo No.A3/15670/99, dt

7.12.1999 informed that as per the

G.O.Rt.No.99, Housing (U&IAY) Dept

dtd 3.4.99 the seniority of Sr. B. Mohan

Rao and Sri KVJ Prasad in the post of

Senior Assistants is to be refixed with

effect from 3.4.1990 being the date of

regularisation of their services instead of

1.6.1990 again he was promoted as Sr.Asst

with effect from 8.6.1999 and issued

notional promotion with effect from

31.7.1992 on par with his juniors



In view of the above he has

requested to consider his representation as

Sr.Asst with effect from 1.6.1990 and to

restore his seniority in the cadre of Sr.Asst

and as well as A.M on par with above two

A.Ms of Srikakulam district.

8 91 N.Sanjee He submitted that Sri M. Mohan

vaiah Rao & KVJ Prasad names was fixed in the

Warangal seniority list at Sl.No.80, 81 seniority

given from the date of promotion i.e.

24.6.2008 as A.M instead of reposting

orders i.e. 4.11.2008.



In view of the above he requested

to revise their seniority after Sl.No.95 in

the seniority list of Asst.Manager.



9 50 P. Sree He submitted that he was at

Ramulu Sl.No.50 in the provisional list of A.M and

Kadapa at Sl.No.58 in the final list of Sr.Asst. but

the Sl.No.60 Sri D. Ramulu, Sl.No.89, Sri

K. Prasad in the list of Sr.Asst were kept

before, where they are juniors to him in the

cadre of Sr.Asst according to the final

seniority list of Sr.Assistants. But their

names shown in the provisional seniority

list of A.Ms at Sl.No.36 Sri D. Ramulu

and Sl.No.38 K. Prasad and his name

shown at Sl.No.50 and it will be construed

that Sri D. Ramulu and Sri K. Prasad as

juniors to him. Hence the promotions as

Assistant Managers from the cadre of

Sr.Assts to him also extended on par with

his juniors.

10 73 A. He submitted that he was at

Khader Sl.No.50 in the provisional list of A.M and

Basha at Sl.No.58 in the final list of Sr.Asst. but

Kadapa the Sl.No.89, Sri K. Prasad in the list of

Sr.Asst were kept before, where they are

juniors to him in the cadre of Sr.Asst

according to the final seniority list of

Sr.Assistants. But their names shown in

the provisional seniority list of A.Ms at

Sl.No.38 K. Prasad and his name shown

at Sl.No.50 and it will be construed that

Sri K. Prasad as juniors to him. Hence the

promotions as Assistant Managers from

the cadre of Sr.Assts to him also extended

on par with his juniors.





11 42 S. He submitted that he acquired M.A.

Ravinder qualification from Madhya Pradesh Bhoj

University, Bhopal and register his

Karimna qualification in the SR on 6.11.2006 . At

gar the time of promotions in the cadre of

A.Ms in 2007 unfortunately his juniors

both Jr.Asst and Sr.Assts cadres have been

considered and promoted them ignoring

his name for consideration as

Asst.Manager along with them.

Subsequently he promoted as A.M in 2008.



In view the above he requested to

place his name in appropriate place i.e.

after Sri K. Bhanoji Rao, Sl.No.33 and

before Sri N. Srinivasa Rao Sl.No.34 in

the cadre of A.M.

12 13 81 80 KVJ They have submitted that the

Prasad Government in G.O.Ms.No.333,

dt.9.9.2005 have issued orders for

B.Mohan regularistion of their services as direct

Rao Senior Assistants with effect from

Srikakula 1.6.1990 with all consequential benefits

m acrued thereon and based on these orders

the M.D, APSHCL has informed that their

names was placed at Sl.No.82 A/B in the

Seniority list of Sr.Asst instead of placing

their names at Sl.No.25 A/B after K.

Ganesh Babu who was promoted as

Sr.Asst on 24.5.1990 i.e. before the date of

their regularisation of service i.e. 1.6.1990



Further he submitted that his juniors

at about 56 were placed at top of their

names due to non consideration of rules

applicable to the direct recruitees and also

without considering the orders issued in

Procds.No.A3/11728/2008, dt.1.4.2009

and considered their name on par with Sri

M. Arun Kumar and deleted his name

from the State Wide Seniority list of

Jr.Assistants and not even considered the

seniority as per Memop No.A3/3380/2005,

dt.11.3.2008.

Further they submitted their names

was placed at Sl.No.80,81 in the

provisional list of A.Ms instead of placing

their names at Sl.No.26 after K.N. Ganesh

Babu who was promoted as A.M on

17.2.2003. As a result he kept in loss of 5

years promotion benefits in the cadre of

A.M since he was appointed as AM on

24.6.2008.

In view of the above they requested

to refix their seniority considering their

date of initial appointment in the cadre of

direct Senior Assistant i.e. 22.10.1986 and

to consider the date of regularisation in the

cadre of direct Sr.Asst i.e. 1.6.1990 in

terms of G.O.Rt.No.303, dt.9.9.2005



14 15 56 54 N. They have submitted he representation

16 17 55 Gopal filed by them also not taken in to

18 57 Rao consideration and not even placed the

19 20 49 K.Prabhamatter before the Board, as was done in

75 kar case of the representations filed by Sri

48 Y.U. Bhaskar Rao and others Managers on

V.V.R.M the same subject.

urthy



K.Venkat

eshwar

Rao

P.Harish

ankar

Rao C.

Narayana

Reddy



G.Ravi

Kumar



In this context they like to submit

that main objection filed by them in the

cadre of Jr. Assistants is that the (18)

individuals, who are not possessing the

minimum requisite qualification of Degree

and continued in the list of Jr. Assistants

shall be deleted as per APSHCL Service

Rules, 1984 and as per the directions of

Hon’ble High court in WP. No.

34150/1998 and 36367/1998.

In this connection they like to

reiterate the facts which were already

brought in to the notice of MD., APSHCL.



1. The then M.D/E.D had been

particularly endorsed on the file of

seniority list of Jr. Assts. in the year 1994

to remove the names of certain persons

from the list of Jr. Assts. The facts &

connected records are not placed before

the management.

2. It is a fact that as a result of

judgement in W.P.No.s 34150/1998 and

36367/1998, the action has been taken for

finalisation of seniority in the cadre of Jr.

Asst. retrospectively from 1994.

3. The said action of finalising the

seniority list of Jr. Assts. should be taken

up based on the Service Rules of 1984 as

per the directions of the Hon’ble Court.

4. The APSHCL Service Rules, 1984

are very clearly indicates that the

qualification of graduation in any

discipline is essential to appoint as Jr.

Assts.

5. Neither the Board of APSHCL nor

the Govt. has given relaxation exempting

to appoint the non-graduates in the post of

Jr. Asst.

6. If any relaxation is given to the

qualification prescribed for the post of Jr.

Asst., it should be in the form of orders

either by the Government or proceedings

by the Board of APSHCL, duly passing

amendment to the Service Rules of 1984.

7. It is also fact that so far no such

amendments are made to the Service Rules

of 1984 in respect of the minimum

qualification prescribed for appointment as

Jr. Asst. It is an evidence that the

comments made by the Prl. Secretary to

Govt., in the minutes dated 22/12/1998

which was enclosed to my representation

dt: 10.2.09 (ref. 1st cited) to state that no

exemption or relaxation or amendments

are made to Service Rules, 1984.

8. To implement the true spirit of

G.O.No.217 dt: 31.12.1994, the proposals

of the M.D submitted to Govt. shall kindly

be examined based on which the said G.O.

was issued.

9. The names of (26) Non-graduate

employees shall be removed from the

seniority list of Junior Assistants to protect

the interest of eligible candidates and to

obey the orders of Hon’ble Court.



The Govt., in its Lr. No. 3009/RA-

1/92-1 dt 08.10.1992 have instructed to

take action as deemed fit since no

qualifications are prescribed in the Service

Rules of Corporation for promotion to the

category of Sr. Assts from the cadre of Jr.

Assts. Subsequently, the prl. Secretary to

Govt., Housing Department had stated

while communicating the minutes of the

meeting held on 22.12.1998 in the

presence of MD APSHCL that relaxation

of rules generally will be given only in

respect of age, and at the most, sponsoring

through employment exchange, but not in

any case Educational qualification.

Instructions were also issued by the prl.

Secretary to Govt., Housing Department to

review and revise the seniority of Sr. Asst.,

duly deleting the names of non-graduates.

Before to issuing the instructions on

22.12.1998, the Govt. have published

APSHCL Service Rules, 1998 vide G.O.

MS. No. 33 Msg(RM)Dept., dt 26.05.98.

In the said Service Rule at chapter – VIII

under General Clause of Application it

was clearly mentioned that not

withstanding anything contained in these

rules where any particular rule is fund

deficient and insufficient to meet the

requirements and demands of any situation

in the interpretation and application of

these rules, the Andhra Pradesh State and

Subordinate Service Rules, the

Fundamental Rules and other Govt. rules

issued from time to time shall be

applicable to remove and supplement to

the extent of deficiency or insufficiency of

the Andhra Pradesh State Housing

Corporation Service Rules. Even after

issuing specific instructions by the prl.

Secretary to Govt., Housing Department to

take action deemed fit in respect of non-

graduate employees, so far no action has

been taken either to place the matter

before the Board of APSHCL and to

obtain r

They felt that it is not out of place to

mention here regarding the relaxation

obtained from the Govt., duly following

the procedure for promotion to the post of

Managers form the feeder category of

Asst. Managers. “As per APSHCL Service

Rules, 1998 one should possess Post

Graduation/post graduation in commerce

to get promotion to the post Manager from

the post of Asst. Manager”.

The specific clause/Rule mentioned

in the APSHCL Service Rules, 1998 was

got amended vide G.O. Ms. No. 54

Housing (RH-1) Dept. dt. 16.08.2005 duly

passing a resolution by the BOARD of

APSHCL..

Keeping in view of the facts stated

above, the original seniority resorted to the

Non-graduates in the cadre of Jr. Assts and

Sr. Assts shall be reviewed as desired by

the prl. Secretary to Govt. in Housing

Department as per the APSHCL Service

Rules, 1984 and subsequently amended

and as per the Judgment in WP No’s

34150/1998 & 36367/1998. The seniority

in the cadre of Sr. Assts shall be given to

the incumbents from the date of acquiring

the minimum requisite qualification of

graduation in any discipline.

Regarding the second objection of

assigning notional seniority it is clarified

by the corporation that “the corporation is

a Autonomous Body and the Board is

having powers to modify any rules and

regulations of corporation in the interest of

the employees and public. As such the

Rule 26(d) of A.P. State Subordinate

Service Rules 1996 i.e., no appeal for

assignment of notional seniority on par

with juniors should be entertained after a

period of 90 days from the date of

promotion may not be applicable in this

case.

In this connection they would like

to submit that as per APSHCL service

Rules, 1998 chapter-I under preliminary &

definitions at serial No. 4 change or

alternation modification by way of an

amendment to these rules shall be made

with prior approval of the Board and

Government. Further at serial No. 6 of

chapter-I of APSHCL Service Rules, 1998

it was clearly mentioned that “not

withstanding any thing contained in these

Rules, the government shall have a general

power of superintendence and control over

the administration of the Corporation.

Exercise of such power and control shall

extend to giving general instructions and

directions to carry out the policies of the

Government both financial and

administrative, including the final

interpretation of the rules and such

instructions, directions and interpretations

are binding on the Corporation



Further in chapter VIII of APSHCL

Service Rules, 1998 under General Clause

of Applications it was mentioned that “not

withstanding anything contained in these

rules where any particular rule is fund

deficient and insufficient to meet the

requirements and demands of any situation

in the interpretation and application of

these rules, the Andhra Pradesh State and

Subordinate Service Rules, the

Fundamental Rules and other Govt. rules

issued from time to time shall be

applicable to remove and supplement to

the extent of deficiency or insufficiency of

the Andhra Pradesh State Housing

Corporation Service Rules. APSHCL

Service Rules.

The provisional seniority list in the

cadre of Asst. Managers prepared and

issued vide ref. 11th cited based on the

impunged seniority of Jr. Assts and Sr.

Assistants is not correct. Until and unless

revising the seniority in the cadre of Jr.

Assistants and Sr. Assist finalizing the

seniority in the cadre of Asst. Managers

will leads to another legal complication

After revising the seniority in the

cadre of Jr. Assts and Sr. Assts duly

deleting names of non-graduates and the

name of incumbents to whom notional

seniority was assigned, my name should be

placed at sl. No. 27 in the seniority list of

Asst. Managers

RITY LIST OF ASSISTANT MANAGERS AND REMARKS



Coommit

tee Final

Section Remarks

Recomm Orders

endation

5 6 7

His request for cosidering

promotion w.e.f. 15.05.2000 as

A.M. cannt be considered as the

initial request from him was given

during Feb, 2001 by which time the

promotions were already given duly

arriving at eligibility list of

candidates.









With regard to his

objection to place him above Sri.

P.R. Narsinga Rao, it is to mention

that orders of promotion of P.R.

Narsinga Rao were given w.e.f.

24.06.2001 notionally based on the

Govt. orders.

Accepted, Date of Birth will be

changed as 15.08.1955.









The individual is

requesting to consider her position

at S.No.(2) in the roster point and

accordingly place her in the same

position i.e S.No.(2). However,

her actual seniority position is the

last among the 2nd batch of A.M.

Promotees during 2003.





Hence her position will remain

the same.

However, in the next

promotion i.e. to Managers she will

be given the advanced position as

warranted by the roster.

In view of above, her present

request is rejected.

(i) The Individual's plea is

that the persons who have

completed their Master Degree

without going throgh the Bachelor's

Degree cannot be considered as

tbhere are no specific orders from

Govt. in this respect.

(ii) His request for adding the

B.L qualification will be considered

as the same was entered in the

service register.



(i) The Individual's plea is

that the persons who have

completed their Master Degree

without going throgh the Bachelor's

Degree cannot be considered as

tbhere are no specific orders from

Govt. in this respect.









His request to enter his

B.A.Degree in the seniority list is

accepted.





His request to consider

giving seniority on par with Sri. B.

Mohan Rao and K.V.J. Prasad

cannot be considered as the

seniority of these individuals was

given as per Govt. order No.99,

H(U & IAY) Dept. dated

03.04.1999

The request of the

individual cannot be considered as

the orders of retention were given

by H.O. proceeding

No.A3/9738/2008 dated 04.11.2008.









(i) The request of the

individual in respect of Sri. D.

Ramulu cannot be considered as D.

Ramulu belongs to S.C. and was

promoted earlier than the individual

under roster systems.

The objection of the

individual cannot be considered as

a disciplinary case and court case

was pending against him at the time

when N. Srinivasa Rao, S. Srinivas

and others were promoted.

Subsequently in 2008 he was given

promotion basing on the legal

opinion with condition that it is

subject to outcome of the court

case. Case is still pending.

His objection was already

considered and rejected while

finalising the Senior Assistant

Seniority list. Hence rejected.

Their objection was

already considered and rejected

while finalizing the Junior

Assistant / Senior Assistant

Seniority lists. Hence rejected.

OBJECTIONS RECEIVED ON PROVISIONAL SENIORITY LIST OF ASSISTANT MANAGERS AND REMARKS



Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

1 16 AVSR Anjaneyulu He submit that he passed MA through Madurai Kamaraj His request for cosidering promotion w.e.f. 15.05.2000 as A.M. cannot

Head office University during the month of April 2000. He received the original be considered as the initial request from him was given during Feb, 2001 by

certificate in the month February 2001. Soon after receipt of original which time the promotions were already given duly arriving at eligibility list of

certificate requested the MD in February 2001 for his promotion as candidates. With

Asst.Manager. The Corporation addressed to the Controller of the regard to his objection to place him above Sri. P.R. Narsinga Rao, it is to

examination in the March 2001 for genuineness of certificate and mention that orders of promotion of P.R. Narsinga Rao were given w.e.f.

genuineness certificate is also received. 24.06.2001 notionally based on the Govt. orders.

Further he submited that govt.in their Lr.No.423/RHI/99-1,

dtd.10.12.1999 have clarified the case of A.Es promoted from WI (Tech)

that the person is eligible to be considered for promotion to the cadre of

A.E only from the date of acquisition of Diploma in Civil or Mechanical

Engineering. Further the Government in G.O.Rt.No.52, Housing

(U&IAY) Dept., dtd.25.2.2009 has clarified that NTWI as TWI be

treated as conversion from the date of acquiring required technical

qualification.

As per the FR 26(q) and clarifications issue by Government in pre-

paras he had to be promoted with effect from 22.4.2000 the day

following the last date of examination. But promotion were given on

15.5.2000 by the Corporation. Hence he has requested to consider his

case on par with his juniors who were promoted on 15.5.2000

Further he submitted that in the provisional Seniority list issued on

22.3.2005 his name was shown at Sl.No.15 at tnat time the name of Sri

P.R. Narsing Rao not not take place in the seniority list of A.Ms. He

submitted a representation on the said provisional seniority list to give

notional promotion with retrospective from 15.5.2000 as he has passed

the requisite qualification in April 2000. But his request not considered

by the MD stating that he not submitted his educational qualification

certificate at the time of effecting promotions i.e. on 15.5.2000.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

Further he submitted Sri P.R. Narsing Rao were promoted as A.M with

effect from 24.6.2001 on notional basis by exonerating the charge

framed against him, though he was promoted as A.M on 11.11.2005 his

name was shown at Sl.No. A4(A) above his name though he was

promoted as A.M on 17.2.2003 much before his promotion as A.M

taking into account his notional promotion with effect from 24.6.2001.

The seniority fixed in the lower cadre should always be maintained for

all future promotions as per rule 33 of A.P. State & Subordinate Service

Rules.

In view of the above he requested to promote him as Assistant

Manager with effect from 15.5.2000 on par with juniors between Sri M.

Gangaram Sl.No 8 and Smt D. Sarojini Devi Sl.No.9.







2 1 M. Arun Kumar Head He requested that his date or birth may be changed as His case is considered for correction of date of birth in the Seniority list as per

office 15.08.1955 instead of 15.08.1952 as already recorded in his service entries in the S.R.

register as 15.08.1955.

3 30 D.P.Margatte She has requested to fix her seniority at al.No.17 in between Sri The individual is requesting to consider her position at S.No.(2) in the

Visakhapatnam AVSR Anjaneyulu, Sl.No.16 and Smt N. lakhmikantham, Sl.No.17 roster point and accordingly place her in the same position i.e S.No.(2).

instead of Sl.No.30 as her case considered as promotion as A.M on par However, her actual seniority position is the last among the 2nd batch of A.M.

with 14 other colleages with effect from 14.2.2008 vide Promotees during 2003. Hence her position will remain the same.

Proces.No.A3/2791/2006, dt.8.5.2009 as per rule of reservation at However, in the next promotion i.e. to Managers she will be given the advanced

roaster point 2 fixed for women SC candidate. position as warranted by the roster. In view

of above, her present request is rejected.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

4 60 F.B. Morris He submitted that as per the recent judgement of Madras High He has not enclosed any judgement orders of Honble High Court of Madras and

Visakhapatnam Court as Well as Supreme Court of India, the P.G. qualification acquired Supreme Court of India wherein as he stated that the P.G. qualification

from 10+2 directly with out having the minimum qualification of degree acquiring from 10 + 2 directly without Dregree is not at all valid. There are no

is not at all valid. But as seen from the provisional seniority list of A.Ms specific orders from the Government. Hence rejected.

nearly 7 employees who are actually SSC and Intermediate qualiried

persons who acquired PG Degree directly without having minimum

qualification of degree were placed above his name.

Further he requested to include his B.L. degree aqualification in

the seniority list (SR copy enclosed) and also rectify his place of work as

Vizianagaram instead of Visakhapatnam.







5 72 K.Sai Durga Prasad He submitted that as per the recent judgement of Madras High He has not enclosed any judgement orders of Honble High Court of Madras and

Visakhapatnam Court as Well as Supreme Court of India, the P.G. qualification acquired Supreme Court of India wherein as he stated that the P.G. qualification

from 10+2 directly with out having the minimum qualification of degree acquiring from 10 + 2 directly without Dregree is not at all valid. There are no

is not at all valid. But as seen from the provisional seniority list of A.Ms specific orders from the Government. Hence rejected.

nearly 7 employees who are actually SSC and Intermediate qualiried

persons who acquired PG Degree directly without having minimum

qualification of degree were placed above his name and he is going to

retire from service in the Feburary 2010.

6 99 S.Md. Khasim He requested to rectiry his qualification shown as Inter but his His case is considered to mention the B.A. qualification and the same is

Anantapur qualifiation is B.A which is altered in the final seniority list of Seniority included in the Seniority list.

Assistant

Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

7 121 P.Satyanarayana Head He submitted that he was appointed as TWI on consoldiated pay He was promoted as Asst. Mgr based on the Seniority list of Sr.Assts already

Office by the District Collector on 17.2.1985. finalised and communicated. As such, his request is rejected

Further he was appointed as Jr.Asst on daily wages vide

Procds.No.2262/86-C, dt.11.9.1986 by the DM, W.G.Dist

Further he was appointed as Sr.Asst on consolidated pay vide

Procds.No.361/85/C, dt.3.12.1986 by the Dist.Collector, W.G.Dist in the

existing vacancy, the District Collector was placed in time scale of pay

as Jr.Asst. with effect from 1.1.1990 stating that three posts in district

office and one post of Sr.Assistant in the office of the DEE (H), Kovvur

were down graded as Jr.Assistants as on economy measure. Thus it was

clear that it was post vacant that was down graded but not his

appointment as Senior Assistant.

Further he submitted that Sri KVJ Prasad and B. Mohan Rao of

Srikakulam was appointed on consolidated pay like him are working as

Sr.Assistants in the district and their services were regularized as

Sr.Assistant with effect from 1.6.1990 by the DM, Srikakulam.

But his representation was not considered and he approached the

Hon'ble High Court and High Court issued orders in W.P.No.5754 of

1994 directing the respondents to consider the representation made by

him and pass appropriate orders in accordance with rules within twelve

weeks.

Vide Procds.No.Rc.No.1178/94C, dt.12.9.1994 fo the District

Collector, W.G. District stated that the request of Sri P. Satyanarayana,

Jr.Asst claiming seniority for Sr.Asst post is rejected and his claim that

his seniority shall be considered for the post of Sr.Asst on the gound that

two incumbents of Srikakulam district were regularised as Sr.Assts is not

tenable on the ground that the APSHCL, Hyderabad has already issued

isntructions for reversion of the two incumbents of Srikakulam district.

He he is not entitled for claiming seniority for Sr.Asst post in accordance

with the rules of the Corporation.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

Again he submitted a representation to consider his case on par with the

above individuals with effect from 1.1.1990 as Sr.Asst. Vide Memo

No.A3/15670/99, dt 7.12.1999 informed that as per the G.O.Rt.No.99,

Housing (U&IAY) Dept dtd 3.4.99 the seniority of Sr. B. Mohan Rao

and Sri KVJ Prasad in the post of Senior Assistants is to be refixed with

effect from 3.4.1990 being the date of regularisation of their services

instead of 1.6.1990 again he was promoted as Sr.Asst with effect from

8.6.1999 and issued notional promotion with effect from 31.7.1992 on

par with his juniors

In view of the above he has requested to consider his

representation as Sr.Asst with effect from 1.6.1990 and to restore his

seniority in the cadre of Sr.Asst and as well as A.M on par with above

two A.Ms of Srikakulam district.







8 91 N.Sanjeevaiah He submitted that Sri M. Mohan Rao & KVJ Prasad names was Sri. B.Mohan Rao and K.V.J.Prasad, Sr.Assts were promoted as Asst Mgrs on

Warangal fixed in the seniority list at Sl.No.80, 81 seniority given from the date of 24.06.08. They could not report duty as Asst. Mgrs in their respective posting

promotion i.e. 24.6.2008 as A.M instead of reposting orders i.e. places due to some administrative reasons. Subsequently orders are issued on

4.11.2008. 04.11.08 by the MD. Hence request is rejected.

In view of the above he requested to revise their seniority after

Sl.No.95 in the seniority list of Asst.Manager.







9 50 P. Sree Ramulu Kadapa He submitted that he was at Sl.No.50 in the provisional list of It is known that Sri. D.Ramulu belongs to SC. Though he is Junior to Sri.

A.M and at Sl.No.58 in the final list of Sr.Asst. but the Sl.No.60 Sri D. P.Sree Ramulu in the cadre of Sr.Assts, he is promoted earlier on 07.07.07

Ramulu, Sl.No.89, Sri K. Prasad in the list of Sr.Asst were kept before, than Sri. P.Sree Ramulu as per rule of reservation in the cadre of Asst. Mgrs.

where they are juniors to him in the cadre of Sr.Asst according to the As such, he is placed and shown above Sri. P.Sree Ramulu in th Seniority list

final seniority list of Sr.Assistants. But their names shown in the of Asst. Mgrs as per roster points. Further, Sri. K.Prasad (38) is Junior than

provisional seniority list of A.Ms at Sl.No.36 Sri D. Ramulu and Sri.P.Sree Ramulu (50) in the cadre of Sr.Assts. But he was promoted as Asst.

Sl.No.38 K. Prasad and his name shown at Sl.No.50 and it will be Mgr w.e.f. 05.01.08 whereas Sri. P.Sree Ramulu promoted as Asst. Mgr w.e.f

construed that Sri D. Ramulu and Sri K. Prasad as juniors to him. Hence 24.06.08. The case will be referred to the Govt.

the promotions as Assistant Managers from the cadre of Sr.Assts to him

also extended on par with his juniors.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

10 73 A. Khader Basha He submitted that he was at Sl.No.50 in the provisional list of A.M and Sri. K.Prasad (89) is Junior to A.Khader Basha (84) in the cadre of Sr. Assts.

Kadapa at Sl.No.58 in the final list of Sr.Asst. but the Sl.No.89, Sri K. Prasad in But he was promoted as Asst. Mgr w.e.f. 05.01.08 whereas Sri. A.K.Basha (73)

the list of Sr.Asst were kept before, where they are juniors to him in the has been promoted as Asst Mgr w.e.f. 24.6.08. The case will be referred to the

cadre of Sr.Asst according to the final seniority list of Sr.Assistants. But Govt.

their names shown in the provisional seniority list of A.Ms at Sl.No.38

K. Prasad and his name shown at Sl.No.50 and it will be construed that

Sri K. Prasad as juniors to him. Hence the promotions as Assistant

Managers from the cadre of Sr.Assts to him also extended on par with

his juniors.









11 42 S. Ravinder He submitted that he acquired M.A. qualification from Madhya It is known that there is a court case pending against him. As such his case is

Karimnagar Pradesh Bhoj University, Bhopal and register his qualification in the SR not considered for promotion in 2007 alongwith his Juniors. Subsequently he

on 6.11.2006 . At the time of promotions in the cadre of A.Ms in 2007 was promoted as Asst. Mgr w.e.f. 24.6.08 subject to out come of pending court

unfortunately his juniors both Jr.Asst and Sr.Assts cadres have been orders. Hence rejected.

considered and promoted them ignoring his name for consideration as

Asst.Manager along with them. Subsequently he promoted as A.M in

2008.



In view the above he requested to place his name in appropriate

place i.e. after Sri K. Bhanoji Rao, Sl.No.33 and before Sri N. Srinivasa

Rao Sl.No.34 in the cadre of A.M.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

12 81 80 KVJ Prasad They have submitted that the Government in G.O.Ms.No.333, They were promoted as Asst. Mgrs based on the Seniority list of Sr. Assts w.e.f.

13 B.Mohan Rao dt.9.9.2005 have issued orders for regularistion of their services as direct 24.06.08. Their previous request in the cadre of Sr. Assts was considered and

Srikakulam Senior Assistants with effect from 1.6.1990 with all consequential their date of promotion was shown as 01.06.90 instead of 03.04.93. Hence

benefits acrued thereon and based on these orders the M.D, APSHCL rejected.

has informed that their names was placed at Sl.No.82 A/B in the

Seniority list of Sr.Asst instead of placing their names at Sl.No.25 A/B

after K. Ganesh Babu who was promoted as Sr.Asst on 24.5.1990 i.e.

before the date of their regularisation of service i.e. 1.6.1990

Further he submitted that his juniors at about 56 were placed at top

of their names due to non consideration of rules applicable to the direct

recruitees and also without considering the orders issued in

Procds.No.A3/11728/2008, dt.1.4.2009 and considered their name on

par with Sri M. Arun Kumar and deleted his name from the State Wide

Seniority list of Jr.Assistants and not even considered the seniority as per

Memop No.A3/3380/2005, dt.11.3.2008.

Further they submitted their names was placed at Sl.No.80,81 in the

provisional list of A.Ms instead of placing their names at Sl.No.26 after

K.N. Ganesh Babu who was promoted as A.M on 17.2.2003. As a result

he kept in loss of 5 years promotion benefits in the cadre of A.M since

he was appointed as AM on 24.6.2008.

In view of the above they requested to refix their seniority considering

their date of initial appointment in the cadre of direct Senior Assistant

i.e. 22.10.1986 and to consider the date of regularisation in the cadre of

direct Sr.Asst i.e. 1.6.1990 in terms of G.O.Rt.No.303, dt.9.9.2005









14 56 54 N. Gopal Rao They have submitted he representation filed by them also not taken in These seven candidates already raised the same objections on communication

15 55 K.Prabhakar to consideration and not even placed the matter before the Board, as was of Seniority List of Sr.Assts. The Committee has already submitted its remarks

16 57 V.V.R.Murthy done in case of the representations filed by Sri Y.U. Bhaskar Rao and in the matter vide Note dated:16.05.2009. The same remarks are holds good in

17 49 K.Venkateshwar Rao others Managers on the same subject. this case also since they were promoted as Asst. Mgrs based on the Seniority

18 75 48 P.Harishankar Rao C. list of Sr. Assts. Hence rejected.

19 Narayana Reddy

20 G.Ravi Kumar

Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

In this context they like to submit that main objection filed by

them in the cadre of Jr. Assistants is that the (18) individuals, who are

not possessing the minimum requisite qualification of Degree and

continued in the list of Jr. Assistants shall be deleted as per APSHCL

Service Rules, 1984 and as per the directions of Hon’ble High court in

WP. No. 34150/1998 and 36367/1998.

In this connection they like to reiterate the facts which were

already brought in to the notice of MD., APSHCL.

1. The then M.D/E.D had been particularly endorsed on the file of

seniority list of Jr. Assts. in the year 1994 to remove the names of certain

persons from the list of Jr. Assts. The facts & connected records are not

placed before the management.

2. It is a fact that as a result of judgement in W.P.No.s 34150/1998

and 36367/1998, the action has been taken for finalisation of seniority in

the cadre of Jr. Asst. retrospectively from 1994.

3. The said action of finalising the seniority list of Jr. Assts. should be

taken up based on the Service Rules of 1984 as per the directions of the

Hon’ble Court.

4. The APSHCL Service Rules, 1984 are very clearly indicates that

the qualification of graduation in any discipline is essential to appoint as

Jr. Assts.

5. Neither the Board of APSHCL nor the Govt. has given relaxation

exempting to appoint the non-graduates in the post of Jr. Asst.

6. If any relaxation is given to the qualification prescribed for the post

of Jr. Asst., it should be in the form of orders either by the Government

or proceedings by the Board of APSHCL, duly passing amendment to

the Service Rules of 1984.

7. It is also fact that so far no such amendments are made to the

Service Rules of 1984 in respect of the minimum qualification

prescribed for appointment as Jr. Asst. It is an evidence that the

comments made by the Prl. Secretary to Govt., in the minutes dated

22/12/1998 which was enclosed to my representation dt: 10.2.09 (ref. 1st

cited) to state that no exemption or relaxation or amendments are made

to Service Rules, 1984.

8. To implement the true spirit of G.O.No.217 dt: 31.12.1994, the

proposals of the M.D submitted to Govt. shall kindly be examined based

on which the said G.O. was issued.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

9. The names of (26) Non-graduate employees shall be removed from

the seniority list of Junior Assistants to protect the interest of eligible

candidates and to obey the orders of Hon’ble Court.

The Govt., in its Lr. No. 3009/RA-1/92-1 dt 08.10.1992 have

instructed to take action as deemed fit since no qualifications are

prescribed in the Service Rules of Corporation for promotion to the

category of Sr. Assts from the cadre of Jr. Assts. Subsequently, the prl.

Secretary to Govt., Housing Department had stated while

communicating the minutes of the meeting held on 22.12.1998 in the

presence of MD APSHCL that relaxation of rules generally will be

given only in respect of age, and at the most, sponsoring through

employment exchange, but not in any case Educational qualification.

Instructions were also issued by the prl. Secretary to Govt., Housing

Department to review and revise the seniority of Sr. Asst., duly deleting

the names of non-graduates.

Before to issuing the instructions on 22.12.1998, the Govt. have

published APSHCL Service Rules, 1998 vide G.O. MS. No. 33

Msg(RM)Dept., dt 26.05.98. In the said Service Rule at chapter – VIII

under General Clause of Application it was clearly mentioned that not

withstanding anything contained in these rules where any particular rule

is fund deficient and insufficient to meet the requirements and demands

of any situation in the interpretation and application of these rules, the

Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules, the Fundamental

Rules and other Govt. rules issued from time to time shall be applicable

to remove and supplement to the extent of deficiency or insufficiency of

the Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation Service Rules. Even after

issuing specific instructions by the prl. Secretary to Govt., Housing

Department to take action deemed fit in respect of non-graduate

employees, so far no action has been taken either to place the matter

before the Board of APSHCL and to obtain relaxation in respect of the

qualification.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

They felt that it is not out of place to mention here regarding the

relaxation obtained from the Govt., duly following the procedure for

promotion to the post of Managers form the feeder category of Asst.

Managers. “As per APSHCL Service Rules, 1998 one should possess

Post Graduation/post graduation in commerce to get promotion to the

post Manager from the post of Asst. Manager”.

The specific clause/Rule mentioned in the APSHCL Service Rules,

1998 was got amended vide G.O. Ms. No. 54 Housing (RH-1) Dept. dt.

16.08.2005 duly passing a resolution by the BOARD of APSHCL..

Keeping in view of the facts stated above, the original seniority

resorted to the Non-graduates in the cadre of Jr. Assts and Sr. Assts shall

be reviewed as desired by the prl. Secretary to Govt. in Housing

Department as per the APSHCL Service Rules, 1984 and subsequently

amended and as per the Judgment in WP No’s 34150/1998 &

36367/1998. The seniority in the cadre of Sr. Assts shall be given to the

incumbents from the date of acquiring the minimum requisite

qualification of graduation in any discipline.

Regarding the second objection of assigning notional seniority it is

clarified by the corporation that “the corporation is a Autonomous Body

and the Board is having powers to modify any rules and regulations of

corporation in the interest of the employees and public. As such the Rule

26(d) of A.P. State Subordinate Service Rules 1996 i.e., no appeal for

assignment of notional seniority on par with juniors should be

entertained after a period of 90 days from the date of promotion may not

be applicable in this case.

In this connection they would like to submit that as per APSHCL

service Rules, 1998 chapter-I under preliminary & definitions at serial

No. 4 change or alternation modification by way of an amendment to

these rules shall be made with prior approval of the Board and

Government. Further at serial No. 6 of chapter-I of APSHCL Service

Rules, 1998 it was clearly mentioned that “not withstanding any thing

contained in these Rules, the government shall have a general power of

superintendence and control over the administration of the Corporation.

Exercise of such power and control shall extend to giving general

instructions and directions to carry out the policies of the Government

both financial and administrative, including the final interpretation of the

rules and such instructions, directions and interpretations are binding on

the Corporation

Sl. No Senio Name of the Individual Gist of Objection Final Orders

rity No. Smt. / Sri.



1 2 3 4 5

Further in chapter VIII of APSHCL Service Rules, 1998 under

General Clause of Applications it was mentioned that “not withstanding

anything contained in these rules where any particular rule is fund

deficient and insufficient to meet the requirements and demands of any

situation in the interpretation and application of these rules, the Andhra

Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules, the Fundamental Rules

and other Govt. rules issued from time to time shall be applicable to

remove and supplement to the extent of deficiency or insufficiency of

the Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation Service Rules. APSHCL

Service Rules.

The provisional seniority list in the cadre of Asst. Managers prepared

and issued vide ref. 11th cited based on the impunged seniority of Jr.

Assts and Sr. Assistants is not correct. Until and unless revising the

seniority in the cadre of Jr. Assistants and Sr. Assist finalizing the

seniority in the cadre of Asst. Managers will leads to another legal

complication

After revising the seniority in the cadre of Jr. Assts and Sr. Assts duly

deleting names of non-graduates and the name of incumbents to whom

notional seniority was assigned, my name should be placed at sl. No. 27

in the seniority list of Asst. Managers



MGR/My computer/E/JA -Objections/List of objections on Asst.Manager.xls









Managing Director

OBJECTIONS RECEIVED ON PROVISIONAL SENIORITY LIST OF ASSISTANT MANAGERS AND REMARKS







Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 16 AVSR Anjaneyulu He submit that he passed MA through Madurai Kamaraj It is true that he has passed the M.A. in April 2000. But as he has His request for cosidering

Head office University during the month of April 2000. He received the not submitted the certificate of requisite qualification, certain promotion w.e.f. 15.05.2000 as

original certificate in the month February 2001. Soon after receipt Juniors to him in the cadre of Sr.Assts were promoted as Asst. A.M. cannt be considered as the

of original certificate requested the MD in February 2001 for his Mgrs w.e.f. 15.05.2000 in the panel year 1999-2000. Subsequently initial request from him was

promotion as Asst.Manager. The Corporation addressed to the he has submitted the M.A. provisional certificate in February 2001 given during Feb, 2001 by which

Controller of the examination in the March 2001 for genuineness of and requested to consider his promotion as Asst. Manager. But he time the promotions were already

certificate and genuineness certificate is also received. was promoted on 17.02.2003. As per rules in vogue the panel has given duly arriving at eligibility

to be reviewed after 6 months and consider the eligible candidates list of candidates.

whenever vancancies arise for non selection posts.



Further he submited that govt.in their Lr.No.423/RHI/99-1, But in this case as Sri. A.V.S.R.Anjaneyulu submitted the M.A. With regard to his objection

dtd.10.12.1999 have clarified the case of A.Es promoted from WI Provisional certificate in Feb 2001, his case should have been to place him above Sri. P.R.

(Tech) that the person is eligible to be considered for promotion to considered by reviewing the panel (2000-2001) and promoted as Narsinga Rao, it is to mention

the cadre of A.E only from the date of acquisition of Diploma in Asst. Mgr w.e.f. 15.05.2000 notionally placing him at appropriate that orders of promotion of P.R.

Civil or Mechanical Engineering. Further the Government in place since he is eligible for promotion w.e.f. 21.04.2000 as per Narsinga Rao were given w.e.f.

G.O.Rt.No.52, Housing (U&IAY) Dept., dtd.25.2.2009 has F.R.26(a) i.e. last date of M.A. examination in which he passed. 24.06.2001 notionally based on

clarified that NTWI as TWI be treated as conversion from the date As such this has to be examined and considered his request. the Govt. orders.

of acquiring required technical qualification.



As per the FR 26(a) and clarifications issue by Further with regards to his objection for placing him above Sri.

Government in pre-paras he had to be promoted with effect from P.R.Narsing Rao, it is submitted that he was promoted notionally

22.4.2000 the day following the last date of examination. But w.e.f. 24.06.2001 as per the orders of the Govt.

promotion were given on 15.5.2000 by the Corporation. Hence he

has requested to consider his case on par with his juniors who were

promoted on 15.5.2000

Further he submitted that in the provisional Seniority list

issued on 22.3.2005 his name was shown at Sl.No.15 at tnat time

the name of Sri P.R. Narsing Rao not not take place in the seniority

list of A.Ms. He submitted a representation on the said provisional

seniority list to give notional promotion with retrospective from

15.5.2000 as he has passed the requisite qualification in April 2000.

But his request not considered by the MD stating that he not

submitted his educational qualification certificate at the time of

effecting promotions i.e. on 15.5.2000.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

Further he submitted Sri P.R. Narsing Rao were

promoted as A.M with effect from 24.6.2001 on notional basis by

exonerating the charge framed against him, though he was

promoted as A.M on 11.11.2005 his name was shown at Sl.No.

A4(A) above his name though he was promoted as A.M on

17.2.2003 much before his promotion as A.M taking into account

his notional promotion with effect from 24.6.2001. The seniority

fixed in the lower cadre should always be maintained for all future

promotions as per rule 33 of A.P. State & Subordinate Service

Rules.

In view of the above he requested to promote him as

Assistant Manager with effect from 15.5.2000 on par with juniors

between Sri M. Gangaram Sl.No 8 and Smt D. Sarojini Devi

Sl.No.9.





2 1 M. Arun Kumar He requested that his date or birth may be changed as His case has to be considered for correction of date of birth in the Accepted Committee

Head office 15.08.1955 instead of 15.08.1952 as already recorded in his service Seniority list as per entries in the S.R. recommendation

register as 15.08.1955.

3 30 D.P.Margatte She has requested to fix her seniority at al.No.17 in The Govt. in their G.O.M.S. No.5 dt: 14.02.2003 have clearly The individual is requesting

Visakhapatnam between Sri AVSR Anjaneyulu, Sl.No.16 and Smt N. stated that the reservation in promotion in favour of SCs and STs to consider her position at

lakhmikantham, Sl.No.17 instead of Sl.No.30 as her case should be prospective and shall be made applicable to the post to be S.No.(2) in the roster point and

considered as promotion as A.M on par with 14 other colleages filled up. The Panel already prepared for the panel year 2002-2003 accordingly place her in the same

with effect from 14.2.2008 vide Proces.No.A3/2791/2006, and given effect should not be disturbed. In this case she was position i.e S.No.(2). However,

dt.8.5.2009 as per rule of reservation at roaster point 2 fixed for promoted as Asst. Mgr based on the Seniority list of Sr.Assts and her actual seniority position is the

women SC candidate. Panel prepared for 2002-2003. As such, her case is not considered last among the 2nd batch of A.M.

in the cadre of Asst. Mgrs. Hence, her request may be rejected. Promotees during 2003.



Hence her position will

remain the same.

However, in the next

promotion i.e. to Managers she

will be given the advanced

position as warranted by the

roster.

In view of above, her present

request is rejected.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

4 60 F.B. Morris He submitted that as per the recent judgement of Madras He has not enclosed any judgement orders of Honble High Court of Accepted Committee

Visakhapatnam High Court as Well as Supreme Court of India, the P.G. Madras and Supreme Court of India wherein as he stated that the recommendation

qualification acquired from 10+2 directly with out having the P.G. qualification acquiring from 10 + 2 directly without Dregree is

minimum qualification of degree is not at all valid. But as seen not at all valid. There are not specific orders to that effect from

from the provisional seniority list of A.Ms nearly 7 employees who Govt. As such, his request may be rejected. Further his B.L.

are actually SSC and Intermediate qualiried persons who acquired qualification may be added in the Seniority list of Asst. Mgrs. as

PG Degree directly without having minimum qualification of per S.R. entries. If he actually working at Vishakapatnam at

degree were placed above his name. present it may also be corrected in the Seniority list as

Vishakapatnam instead of Vizianagaram.

Further he requested to include his B.L. degree

aqualification in the seniority list (SR copy enclosed) and also

rectify his place of work as Vizianagaram instead of

Visakhapatnam.









5 72 K.Sai Durga Prasad He submitted that as per the recent judgement of Madras He has not enclosed any judgement orders of Honble High Court of Accepted Committee

Visakhapatnam High Court as Well as Supreme Court of India, the P.G. Madras and Supreme Court of India wherein as he stated that the recommendation

qualification acquired from 10+2 directly with out having the P.G. qualification acquiring from 10 + 2 directly without Dregree is

minimum qualification of degree is not at all valid. But as seen not at all valid. There are not specific orders to that effect from

from the provisional seniority list of A.Ms nearly 7 employees who Govt. As such, his request may be rejected.

are actually SSC and Intermediate qualiried persons who acquired

PG Degree directly without having minimum qualification of

degree were placed above his name and he is going to retire from

service in the Feburary 2010.







6 99 S.Md. Khasim He requested to rectiry his qualification shown as Inter but his His case may be considered to mention the B.A. qualification in the Accepted Committee

Anantapur qualifiation is B.A which is altered in the final seniority list of Seniority list. recommendation

Senior Assistant

Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 121 P.Satyanarayana He submitted that he was appointed as TWI on consoldiated He was promoted as Asst. Mgr based on the Seniority list of Accepted Committee

Head Office pay by the District Collector on 17.2.1985. Sr.Assts already finalised and communicated. As such, his request recommendation

may be rejected

Further he was appointed as Jr.Asst on daily wages vide

Procds.No.2262/86-C, dt.11.9.1986 by the DM, W.G.Dist

Further he was appointed as Sr.Asst on consolidated pay vide

Procds.No.361/85/C, dt.3.12.1986 by the Dist.Collector, W.G.Dist

in the existing vacancy, the District Collector was placed in time

scale of pay as Jr.Asst. with effect from 1.1.1990 stating that three

posts in district office and one post of Sr.Assistant in the office of

the DEE (H), Kovvur were down graded as Jr.Assistants as on

economy measure. Thus it was clear that it was post vacant that

was down graded but not his appointment as Senior Assistant.



Further he submitted that Sri KVJ Prasad and B. Mohan Rao

of Srikakulam was appointed on consolidated pay like him are

working as Sr.Assistants in the district and their services were

regularized as Sr.Assistant with effect from 1.6.1990 by the DM,

Srikakulam.

But his representation was not considered and he

approached the Hon'ble High Court and High Court issued orders in

W.P.No.5754 of 1994 directing the respondents to consider the

representation made by him and pass appropriate orders in

accordance with rules within twelve weeks.

Vide Procds.No.Rc.No.1178/94C, dt.12.9.1994 fo the

District Collector, W.G. District stated that the request of Sri P.

Satyanarayana, Jr.Asst claiming seniority for Sr.Asst post is

rejected and his claim that his seniority shall be considered for the

post of Sr.Asst on the gound that two incumbents of Srikakulam

district were regularised as Sr.Assts is not tenable on the ground

that the APSHCL, Hyderabad has already issued isntructions for

reversion of the two incumbents of Srikakulam district. He he is

not entitled for claiming seniority for Sr.Asst post in accordance

with the rules of the Corporation.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

Again he submitted a representation to consider his case on

par with the above individuals with effect from 1.1.1990 as Sr.Asst.

Vide Memo No.A3/15670/99, dt 7.12.1999 informed that as per the

G.O.Rt.No.99, Housing (U&IAY) Dept dtd 3.4.99 the seniority of

Sr. B. Mohan Rao and Sri KVJ Prasad in the post of Senior

Assistants is to be refixed with effect from 3.4.1990 being the date

of regularisation of their services instead of 1.6.1990 again he was

promoted as Sr.Asst with effect from 8.6.1999 and issued notional

promotion with effect from 31.7.1992 on par with his juniors





In view of the above he has requested to consider his

representation as Sr.Asst with effect from 1.6.1990 and to restore

his seniority in the cadre of Sr.Asst and as well as A.M on par with

above two A.Ms of Srikakulam district.







8 91 N.Sanjeevaiah He submitted that Sri M. Mohan Rao & KVJ Prasad names Sri. B.Mohan Rao and K.V.J.Prasad, Sr.Assts were promoted as Accepted Committee

Warangal was fixed in the seniority list at Sl.No.80, 81 seniority given from Asst Mgrs on 24.06.08. They could not report duty as Asst. Mgrs recommendation

the date of promotion i.e. 24.6.2008 as A.M instead of reposting in their respective posting places due to some administrative

orders i.e. 4.11.2008. In reasons. Subsequently orders are issued on 04.11.08 by the MD

view of the above he requested to revise their seniority after retaining them as Asst. Mgrs at their original places. Based on the

Sl.No.95 in the seniority list of Asst.Manager. Seniority list of Sr.Assts already communicated Sri. N.Sanjeevaiah

has been promoted as Asst. Mgrs. Hence, his request may be

rejected.









9 50 P. Sree Ramulu He submitted that he was at Sl.No.50 in the provisional list It is known that Sri. D.Ramulu belongs to SC. Though he is Junior Final decission will be taken in

Kadapa of A.M and at Sl.No.58 in the final list of Sr.Asst. but the Sl.No.60 to Sri. P.Sree Ramulu in the cadre of Sr.Assts, he is promoted consultation with Govt.

Sri D. Ramulu, Sl.No.89, Sri K. Prasad in the list of Sr.Asst were earlier on 07.07.07 than Sri. P.Sree Ramulu as per rule of

kept before, where they are juniors to him in the cadre of Sr.Asst reservation in the cadre of Asst. Mgrs. As such, he is placed and

according to the final seniority list of Sr.Assistants. But their names shown above Sri. P.Sree Ramulu in th Seniority list of Asst. Mgrs

shown in the provisional seniority list of A.Ms at Sl.No.36 Sri D. as per roster points. Further, Sri. K.Prasad (38) is Junior than

Ramulu and Sl.No.38 K. Prasad and his name shown at Sl.No.50 Sri.P.Sree Ramulu (50) in the cadre of Sr.Assts. But he was

and it will be construed that Sri D. Ramulu and Sri K. Prasad as promoted as Asst. Mgr w.e.f. 05.01.08 whereas Sri. P.Sree Ramulu

juniors to him. Hence the promotions as Assistant Managers from promoted as Asst. Mgr w.e.f 24.06.08.

the cadre of Sr.Assts to him also extended on par with his juniors.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

10 73 A. Khader Basha He submitted that he was at Sl.No.50 in the provisional list Sri. K.Prasad (89) is Junior to A.Khader Basha (84) in the cadre of Final decission will be taken in

Kadapa of A.M and at Sl.No.58 in the final list of Sr.Asst. but the Sr. Assts. But he was promoted as Asst. Mgr w.e.f. 05.01.08 consultation with Govt.

Sl.No.89, Sri K. Prasad in the list of Sr.Asst were kept before, whereas Sri. A.K.Basha (73) has been promoted as Asst Mgr w.e.f.

where they are juniors to him in the cadre of Sr.Asst according to 24.6.08.

the final seniority list of Sr.Assistants. But their names shown in

the provisional seniority list of A.Ms at Sl.No.38 K. Prasad and his

name shown at Sl.No.50 and it will be construed that Sri K. Prasad

as juniors to him. Hence the promotions as Assistant Managers

from the cadre of Sr.Assts to him also extended on par with his

juniors.









11 42 S. Ravinder He submitted that he acquired M.A. qualification from Madhya It is known that there is a court case pending against him. As such Accepted Committee

Karimnagar Pradesh Bhoj University, Bhopal and register his qualification in his case is not considered for promotion in 2007 alongwith his recommendation

the SR on 6.11.2006 . At the time of promotions in the cadre of Juniors. Subsequently he was promoted as Asst. Mgr w.e.f. 24.6.08

A.Ms in 2007 unfortunately his juniors both Jr.Asst and Sr.Assts subject to out come of pending court orders.

cadres have been considered and promoted them ignoring his name

for consideration as Asst.Manager along with them. Subsequently

he promoted as A.M in 2008.

In view the above he requested to place his name in

appropriate place i.e. after Sri K. Bhanoji Rao, Sl.No.33 and before

Sri N. Srinivasa Rao Sl.No.34 in the cadre of A.M.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

12 81 80 KVJ Prasad They have submitted that the Government in They were promoted as Asst. Mgrs based on the Seniority list of Sr. Accepted Committee

13 B.Mohan Rao G.O.Ms.No.333, dt.9.9.2005 have issued orders for regularistion of Assts w.e.f. 24.06.08. Their previous request in the cadre of Sr. recommendation

Srikakulam their services as direct Senior Assistants with effect from 1.6.1990 Assts was considered and their date of promotion was shown as

with all consequential benefits acrued thereon and based on these 01.06.90 instead of 03.04.93.

orders the M.D, APSHCL has informed that their names was placed

at Sl.No.82 A/B in the Seniority list of Sr.Asst instead of placing

their names at Sl.No.25 A/B after K. Ganesh Babu who was

promoted as Sr.Asst on 24.5.1990 i.e. before the date of their

regularisation of service i.e. 1.6.1990





Further he submitted that his juniors at about 56 were placed

at top of their names due to non consideration of rules applicable to

the direct recruitees and also without considering the orders issued

in Procds.No.A3/11728/2008, dt.1.4.2009 and considered their

name on par with Sri M. Arun Kumar and deleted his name from

the State Wide Seniority list of Jr.Assistants and not even

considered the seniority as per Memop No.A3/3380/2005,

dt.11.3.2008.

Further they submitted their names was placed at

Sl.No.80,81 in the provisional list of A.Ms instead of placing their

names at Sl.No.26 after K.N. Ganesh Babu who was promoted as

A.M on 17.2.2003. As a result he kept in loss of 5 years promotion

benefits in the cadre of A.M since he was appointed as AM on

24.6.2008.

In view of the above they requested to refix their seniority

considering their date of initial appointment in the cadre of direct

Senior Assistant i.e. 22.10.1986 and to consider the date of

regularisation in the cadre of direct Sr.Asst i.e. 1.6.1990 in terms of

G.O.Rt.No.303, dt.9.9.2005





14 56, N. Gopal Rao They have submitted he representation filed by them also not These seven candidates already raised the same objections on Accepted Committee

15 54 , K.Prabhakar taken in to consideration and not even placed the matter before the communication of Seniority List of Sr.Assts. The Committee has recommendation

16 55 V.V.R.Murthy Board, as was done in case of the representations filed by Sri Y.U. already submitted its remarks in the matter vide Note

17 57 K.Venkateshwar Bhaskar Rao and others Managers on the same subject. dated:16.05.2009. The same remarks are holds good in this case

Rao also since they were promoted as Asst. Mgrs based on the Seniority

18 49 P.Harishankar Rao list of Sr. Assts.

19 75 48 C. Narayana Redd

20 G.Ravi Kumar

Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

In this context they like to submit that main objection filed by

them in the cadre of Jr. Assistants is that the (18) individuals, who

are not possessing the minimum requisite qualification of Degree

and continued in the list of Jr. Assistants shall be deleted as per

APSHCL Service Rules, 1984 and as per the directions of Hon’ble

High court in WP. No. 34150/1998 and 36367/1998.

In this connection they like to reiterate the facts which were

already brought in to the notice of MD., APSHCL.

1. The then M.D/E.D had been particularly endorsed on the file

of seniority list of Jr. Assts. in the year 1994 to remove the names

of certain persons from the list of Jr. Assts. The facts & connected

records are not placed before the management.



2. It is a fact that as a result of judgement in W.P.No.s

34150/1998 and 36367/1998, the action has been taken for

finalisation of seniority in the cadre of Jr. Asst. retrospectively from

1994.

3. The said action of finalising the seniority list of Jr. Assts.

should be taken up based on the Service Rules of 1984 as per the

directions of the Hon’ble Court.

4. The APSHCL Service Rules, 1984 are very clearly indicates

that the qualification of graduation in any discipline is essential to

appoint as Jr. Assts.

5. Neither the Board of APSHCL nor the Govt. has given

relaxation exempting to appoint the non-graduates in the post of Jr.

Asst.

6. If any relaxation is given to the qualification prescribed for

the post of Jr. Asst., it should be in the form of orders either by the

Government or proceedings by the Board of APSHCL, duly passing

amendment to the Service Rules of 1984.

7. It is also fact that so far no such amendments are made to the

Service Rules of 1984 in respect of the minimum qualification

prescribed for appointment as Jr. Asst. It is an evidence that the

comments made by the Prl. Secretary to Govt., in the minutes dated

22/12/1998 which was enclosed to my representation dt: 10.2.09

st

(ref. 1 cited) to state that no exemption or relaxation or

amendments are made to Service Rules, 1984.

8. To implement the true spirit of G.O.No.217 dt: 31.12.1994,

the proposals of the M.D submitted to Govt. shall kindly be

examined based on which the said G.O. was issued.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

9. The names of (26) Non-graduate employees shall be removed

from the seniority list of Junior Assistants to protect the interest of

eligible candidates and to obey the orders of Hon’ble Court.



The Govt., in its Lr. No. 3009/RA-1/92-1 dt 08.10.1992 have

instructed to take action as deemed fit since no qualifications are

prescribed in the Service Rules of Corporation for promotion to the

category of Sr. Assts from the cadre of Jr. Assts. Subsequently, the

prl. Secretary to Govt., Housing Department had stated while

communicating the minutes of the meeting held on 22.12.1998 in

the presence of MD APSHCL that relaxation of rules generally

will be given only in respect of age, and at the most, sponsoring

through employment exchange, but not in any case Educational

qualification. Instructions were also issued by the prl. Secretary to

Govt., Housing Department to review and revise the seniority of Sr.

Asst., duly deleting the names of non-graduates.





Before to issuing the instructions on 22.12.1998, the Govt.

have published APSHCL Service Rules, 1998 vide G.O. MS. No.

33 Msg(RM)Dept., dt 26.05.98. In the said Service Rule at chapter

– VIII under General Clause of Application it was clearly

mentioned that not withstanding anything contained in these rules

where any particular rule is fund deficient and insufficient to meet

the requirements and demands of any situation in the interpretation

and application of these rules, the Andhra Pradesh State and

Subordinate Service Rules, the Fundamental Rules and other Govt.

rules issued from time to time shall be applicable to remove and

supplement to the extent of deficiency or insufficiency of the

Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation Service Rules. Even

after issuing specific instructions by the prl. Secretary to Govt.,

Housing Department to take action deemed fit in respect of non-

graduate employees, so far no action has been taken either to place

the matter before the Board of APSHCL and to obtain relaxation in

respect of the qualification.

Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

They felt that it is not out of place to mention here regarding

the relaxation obtained from the Govt., duly following the

procedure for promotion to the post of Managers form the feeder

category of Asst. Managers. “As per APSHCL Service Rules, 1998

one should possess Post Graduation/post graduation in commerce to

get promotion to the post Manager from the post of Asst. Manager”.



The specific clause/Rule mentioned in the APSHCL Service

Rules, 1998 was got amended vide G.O. Ms. No. 54 Housing (RH-

1) Dept. dt. 16.08.2005 duly passing a resolution by the BOARD of

APSHCL..

Keeping in view of the facts stated above, the original

seniority resorted to the Non-graduates in the cadre of Jr. Assts and

Sr. Assts shall be reviewed as desired by the prl. Secretary to Govt.

in Housing Department as per the APSHCL Service Rules, 1984

and subsequently amended and as per the Judgment in WP No’s

34150/1998 & 36367/1998. The seniority in the cadre of Sr. Assts

shall be given to the incumbents from the date of acquiring the

minimum requisite qualification of graduation in any discipline.



Regarding the second objection of assigning notional

seniority it is clarified by the corporation that “the corporation is a

Autonomous Body and the Board is having powers to modify any

rules and regulations of corporation in the interest of the employees

and public. As such the Rule 26(d) of A.P. State Subordinate

Service Rules 1996 i.e., no appeal for assignment of notional

seniority on par with juniors should be entertained after a period of

90 days from the date of promotion may not be applicable in this

case.

In this connection they would like to submit that as per

APSHCL service Rules, 1998 chapter-I under preliminary &

definitions at serial No. 4 change or alternation modification by

way of an amendment to these rules shall be made with prior

approval of the Board and Government. Further at serial No. 6 of

chapter-I of APSHCL Service Rules, 1998 it was clearly mentioned

that “not withstanding any thing contained in these Rules, the

government shall have a general power of superintendence and

control over the administration of the Corporation. Exercise of such

power and control shall extend to giving general instructions and

directions to carry out the policies of the Government both financial

and administrative, including the final interpretation of the rules

and such instructions, directions and interpretations are binding on

the Corporation

Sl. No Senio Name of the Gist of Objection Committee Recommendations Final Orders

rity No. individual

Smt. / Sri.

1 2 3 4 5 6

Further in chapter VIII of APSHCL Service Rules, 1998

under General Clause of Applications it was mentioned that “not

withstanding anything contained in these rules where any particular

rule is fund deficient and insufficient to meet the requirements and

demands of any situation in the interpretation and application of

these rules, the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service

Rules, the Fundamental Rules and other Govt. rules issued from

time to time shall be applicable to remove and supplement to the

extent of deficiency or insufficiency of the Andhra Pradesh State

Housing Corporation Service Rules. APSHCL Service Rules.



The provisional seniority list in the cadre of Asst. Managers

prepared and issued vide ref. 11th cited based on the impunged

seniority of Jr. Assts and Sr. Assistants is not correct. Until and

unless revising the seniority in the cadre of Jr. Assistants and Sr.

Assist finalizing the seniority in the cadre of Asst. Managers will

leads to another legal complication

After revising the seniority in the cadre of Jr. Assts and Sr.

Assts duly deleting names of non-graduates and the name of

incumbents to whom notional seniority was assigned, my name

should be placed at sl. No. 27 in the seniority list of Asst. Managers







MGR/My computer/E/JA -Objections/List of objections on Asst.Manager.xls









Sd/-

Managing Director

//Attested//







Dy.General Manager(Admn. & Vig)