Achieving the Dream,
Fall, 2006 Findings
Supplemental Learning (SL)
Learning in Community (LinC)
Student Success (SLS)
Supplemental Learning
Findings – Fall, 2006
Population Enrolled in Developmental
Mathematics – Fall, 2006
SL Sections Non-SL Sections
N = 1116 N = 5676
Other
13% Other
12%
Caucasian
Afr. Am. 42% Caucasian
17% 39%
Afr. Am.
21%
Hispanic
28%
Hispanic
28%
(Includes all students enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
FTIC Degree-seeking Population Enrolled in
Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006
SL Sections Non-SL Sections
N = 409 FTIC’s N = 2361 FTIC’s
Other
12% Other
13%
Caucasian Caucasian
Afr. Am. 42% 36%
21%
Afr. Am.
22%
Hispanic
25% Hispanic
29%
(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
Population Enrolled in Developmental
Mathematics – Fall, 2006
SL Sections Non-SL Sections
N = 1116 N = 5676
MAT0012
22% MAT0012
MAT1033
26%
30%
MAT1033
41%
MAT0024 MAT0024
48% 33%
(Includes all students enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
FTIC degree-seeking Population Enrolled in
Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006
SL Sections Non-SL Sections
N = 409 FTIC’s N = 2361 FTIC’s
MAT1033
15%
MAT0012 MAT1033
30% MAT0012
30%
35%
MAT0024 MAT0024
55% 35%
(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
Mandate Levels by Ethnicity for All Students
Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics Courses
SL vs. Non-SL
Light = one prep area; Moderate = two prep areas; Heavy = three prep areas
Other (n=143) 6 26 38 30
Afr. Am. (n=192) 7 23 30 40
Hispanic (n=317) 11 34 26 29
Caucausian (n=464) 13 41 26 20
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Other (n=699) 19 29 26 26
Afr. Am. (n=1192) 11 25 29 35
Hispanic (n=1565) 13 31 27 29
Caucausian (n=2220) 22 38 22 18
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
no prep light moderate heavy
Mandate Levels by Ethnicity for FTIC Students
Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics Courses
SL vs. Non-SL
Light = one prep area; Moderate = two prep areas; Heavy = three prep areas
Other (n=75) 7 27 32 34
Afr. Am. (n=95) 10 23 27 40
Hispanic (n=187) 9 35 23 33
Caucausian (n=234) 13 43 25 19
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Other (n=28) 14 30 27 29
Afr. Am. (n=554) 10 27 27 36
Hispanic (n=734) 8 32 28 32
Caucausian (n=1033) 20 41 23 16
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
no prep light moderate heavy
Supplemental Learning Findings
Fall, 2006
Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity
55%
80
70 78
69 70
60
59 56 57 59 57 56 55
50 52 49
40 45 49 46 47
30
20
10
0
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic All
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.
Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings
Fall, 2006
Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC enrolled students
with a Grade of C or Better in Developmental
55%
Mathematics by Ethnicity
80
70 76
60 66 65
60 58
50 56 55 59 56 54
49 52 50 50 49
40 44
30
20
10
0
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic All
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
Note: 39.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.
FTIC Population in SL Math courses equals 409 students.
Who took advantage of attending
the SL sessions?
41.5% (464/1116) of Students enrolled
42% (128/304) of the Heavy Mandate Level Participated
40% (127/314) of the Moderate Mandate Level Participated
41% (158/381) of the Light Mandate Level Participated
44% (51/117) of the No-prep Mandate Level Participated
39.5% (162/409) of FTIC Students enrolled
42% (45/108) of the Heavy Mandate Level Participated
38% (51/133) of the Moderate Mandate Level Participated
37% (50/135) of the Light Mandate Level Participated
48% (16/33) of the No-prep Mandate Level Participated
Supplemental Learning Findings
Fall, 2006
Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate
55%
Level
100
80 83
60 67 70
64
58 55 52 55 5655
40 52 48 47
4646
40
20
0
Light Moderate Heavy All
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.
Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings
Fall, 2006
Percentage of FTIC enrolled students with a Grade of
C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate
55%
Level
100
80 86
60 65
6363 61 58
52 51 54 54 54
40 49
44
404244
20
0
Light Moderate Heavy All
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.
Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings
Fall, 2006
All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental
Mathematics by Ethnicity
55%
3
2.5 2.69 2.70
2.44 2.54 2.41 2.51 2.61
2 2.34 2.22 2.28 2.35
2.04
1.5
1
0.5
0
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.
Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings
Fall, 2006
Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in
Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity
55%
3
2.5 2.64 2.64 2.66
2.52 2.63
2 2.41 2.26 2.32 2.29 2.41 2.38
2.06
1.5
1
0.5
0
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
Note: 39.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.
FTIC Population in SL Math courses equals 409 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings
Fall, 2006
All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental
Mathematics by Mandate Level
55%
3
2.5 2.84 2.69
2.55 2.48 2.58
2.45 2.51
2 2.2 2.18 2.1 2.14
1.96
1.5
1
0.5
0
Light Moderate Heavy
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Note: 41.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.
Population in SL Math courses equals 1116 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings
Fall, 2006
Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in
Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level
55%
3
2.96
2.5 2.58 2.61 2.62 2.56 2.58
2.34
2 2.28 2.06 1.97 1.98
1.88
1.5
1
0.5
0
Light Moderate Heavy
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
Note: 39.5% of the sample population opted to attend at least one SL session.
FTIC Population in SL Math courses equals 409 students.
Supplemental Learning Findings
Fall, 2006
Percentage of All students with a Grade of C or Better in
Developmental Mathematics by Number of Sessions 55% Attended by
100 Ethnicity
86 86 82
77 79
80 73 70 73 70
65 6365 65 64 64
60 49 48
4546 45
40
20
0
Af. Amer. Caucasian Hispanic All
none 1 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 10 > 10
Supplemental Learning Findings
Fall, 2006
Percentage of All Students with Grade of C or Better in Developmental
Mathematics by Number of Sessions Attended by Mandate Level
55%
100 91
838680 8480 81
80 75 72
68 67
58 5862 60
60 50 53 52
47
38
40
20
0
No - Prep Light Moderate Heavy
none 1 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 10 > 10
Supplemental Learning Campus
Reports by Developmental
Mathematics Course
Supplemental Learning – East
Fall, 2006
Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course
55%
80 72
69 68
70 64 65
56 58 61 57 55
60 53
46 48 48 48
50
38
40
30
20
10
0
MAT0012 MAT0024 MAT1033 Total Campus
2.43
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Note: 45% of MAT0012, 44% of MAT0024, and 38% of MAT1033 the sample population opted to attend at
least one SL session. East Campus total percent participation in SL is 42% of 527 students enrolled in SL
Developmental Mathematics.
Supplemental Learning – Osceola
Fall, 2006
Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course
55%
100 90 89
80 74
67 65 65 64
58 62
60 48
43
40
17
20
0
MAT0024 MAT1033 Total Campus
2.43
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Note: 72% of MAT0024, and 58% of MAT1033 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL
session. Osceola Campus total percent participation in SL is 62% of 169 students enrolled in SL
Developmental Mathematics.
Supplemental Learning – West
Fall, 2006
Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course
55%
60 56 56 56
51 51 50
48 47 48 50
50 45
40
40
30
20
10
0
MAT0012 MAT0024 Total Campus
2.43
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Note: 36% of MAT0012, and 30% of MAT0024 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL
session. West Campus total percent participation in SL is 32% of 280 students enrolled in SL
Developmental Mathematics.
Supplemental Learning – Winter Park
Fall, 2006
Percentage of all students enrolled with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Course
55%
80
68 66
70 62
57 54 51
60 53 51
48 46 48
50 41
40
30
20
10
0
MAT0012 MAT0024 Total Campus
2.43
attended non-attend SL course non-SL course
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Note: 33% of MAT0012, and 37% of MAT0024 the sample population opted to attend at least one SL
session. Winter Park Campus total percent participation in SL is 36% of 140 students enrolled in SL
Developmental Mathematics.
Learning in Community (LinC)
Findings - Fall, 2006
FTIC Degree-seeking Population Enrolled in
LinC – Fall, 2006
LinC Non-LinC
N = 150 FTIC N = 2270 FTIC
Other
11% Caucasian Other
24% 13%
Caucasian
37%
Afr. Am.
Afr. Am. 21%
34%
Hispanic
31%
Hispanic
29%
(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
FTIC degree-seeking Population Enrolled in
Developmental Mathematics – Fall, 2006
LinC Non-LinC
N = 150 FTIC’s N = 2770 FTIC’s
MAT1033
22% MAT1033
28% MAT0012
MAT0012
34%
35%
MAT0024 MAT0024
43% 38%
(Includes FTIC students enrolled in Summer 2006 and Fall 2006 and enrolled in SL Fall 2006)
Mandate Levels by Ethnicity for FTIC Students
Enrolled in Developmental Mathematics Courses
LinC vs. Non-LinC
Light = one prep area; Moderate = two prep areas; Heavy = three prep areas
Other (n=17) 18 18 29 35
Afr. Am. (n=51) 10 19 18 53
Hispanic (n=47) 17 15 21 47
Caucausian (n=35) 14 34 32 20
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Other (n=369) 19 29 30 22
Afr. Am. (n=579) 9 21 33 37
Hispanic (n=790) 14 31 28 27
Caucausian (n=1032) 20 38 23 19
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
no prep light moderate heavy
LinC Findings - Student Success
Fall, 2006
Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C
or Better in Student Success by Ethnicity
55%
100
80 87
78 82
73 75 71
60 70 69
40
20
0
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic All
2.43
SLS only SLS LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
LinC Findings - Student Success
Fall, 2006
Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a
Grade of C or Better in Student Success by Ethnicity
55%
100
80 88 86 85
79
70 71 72 72
60
40
20
0
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic All
2.43
SLS only SLS LinC
LinC Findings - Student Success
Fall, 2006
Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C
or Better in Student Success by Mandate Level
55%
70 %
100
80 86
81 82
75 76
60 72 67 71
40
20
0
Light Moderate Heavy All
2.43
SLS only SLS LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
LinC Findings - Student Success
Fall, 2006
Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a
Grade of C or Better in Student Success by Mandate
55%
70 % Level
100
80 91
83 85
79 77
74 72
60 65
40
20
0
Light Moderate Heavy All
2.43
SLS only SLS LinC
LinC Findings - Student Success
Fall, 2006
All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Student
Success by Ethnicity
55%
70 %
3.2
3.1 3.16
3 3.07
3.02 3.00
2.9
2.8 2.89 2.89
2.7
2.6 2.66 2.70
2.5
2.4
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic All
SLS only SLS LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
LinC Findings - Student Success
Fall, 2006
Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in
Student Success by Ethnicity
55%
70 %
3.2
3.1
3.10 3.12
3 3.04
2.9 2.97
2.8 2.85
2.82
2.7 2.77
2.6 2.65
2.5
2.4
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic All
SLS only SLS LinC
LinC Findings - Student Success
Fall, 2006
All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Student
Success by Mandate Level
55%
70 %
3.2
3.1
3 3.12
3.05 3.02 3.00
2.9
2.8 2.85 2.89
2.80
2.7
2.6 2.66
2.5
2.4
Light Moderate Heavy All
2.43
SLS only SLS LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
LinC Findings - Student Success
Fall, 2006
Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in
Student Success by Mandate Level
55%
70 %
3.1
3 3.08 3.10
3.04
2.9 2.97
2.8 2.87 2.90
2.85
2.7
2.6
2.5 2.59
2.4
2.3
Light Moderate Heavy All
2.43
SLS only SLS LinC
LinC Findings – Dev. Math
Fall, 2006
Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity
55%
70 %
80
70 73
70 69 71
60
50 57 57 55
40 49
30
20
10
0
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic All
2.43
Dev. Math Dev. Math LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
LinC Findings – Dev. Math
Fall, 2006
Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a
Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by
55%
70 % Ethnicity
80
70
71
60 66 65
61 58 59
50 57
50
40
30
20
10
0
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic All
2.43
Dev. Math Dev. Math LinC
LinC Findings – Dev. Math
Fall, 2006
Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics by Mandate
55%
70 % Level
80
70 74 75
60 68
50 59 56
53 55
40 46
30
20
10
0
Light Moderate Heavy All
2.43
Dev. Math Dev. Math LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
LinC Findings – Dev. Math
Fall, 2006
Percentage of Degree-seeking FTIC students with a
Grade of C or Better in Developmental Mathematics by
55%
70 % Mandate Level
80
70 75
71
60 63 65
50 54 57
53
40 44
30
20
10
0
Light Moderate Heavy All
2.43
Dev. Math Dev. Math LinC
LinC Findings – Dev. Math
Fall, 2006
All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental
Mathematics by Ethnicity
55%
70 %
3
2.5 2.69
2.53 2.46
2 2.43 2.39 2.34
2.07 2.08
1.5
1
0.5
0
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic All
Dev. Math Dev. Math LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
LinC Findings – Dev. Math
Fall, 2006
Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in
Developmental Mathematics by Ethnicity
55%
70 %
3
2.5 2.74
2.50 2.57 2.41 2.48 2.44
2
2.10 2.02
1.5
1
0.5
0
Afr. Am. Caucasian Hispanic All
Dev. Math Dev. Math LinC
LinC Findings – Dev. Math
Fall, 2006
All enrolled students Average GPA’s in Developmental
Mathematics by Mandate Level
55%
70 %
3
2.5 2.85
2.51 2.61 2.26 2.34 2.46
2
1.99 2.07
1.5
1
0.5
0
Light Moderate Heavy All
2.43
Dev. Math Dev. Math LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
LinC Findings – Dev. Math
Fall, 2006
Degree-seeking FTIC students Average GPA’s in
Developmental Mathematics by Mandate Level
55%
70 %
3
2.5 2.79
2.60 2.57
2 2.33 2.39 2.44
1.97 2.10
1.5
1
0.5
0
Light Moderate Heavy All
2.43
Dev. Math Dev. Math LinC
LinC Campus Reports by
Developmental Mathematics
and Student Success Courses
East LinC – Developmental Math
Fall 2006
Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics
55%
70 %
100
86
76
80 68
65
60 55 55
49 49
40
20
0
MAT0012 MAT0024 MAT1033 All Dev. Math
2.43
non-LinC LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Osceola LinC–Developmental Math
Fall 2006
Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics
55%
70 %
90
77
80
70 62 66
60 55
50
40
30
20
10
0
MAT0024 SLS1122
2.43
non-LinC LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
West LinC – Developmental Math
Fall 2006
Percentage of All enrolled students with a Grade of C
or Better in Developmental Mathematics
55%
70 % 76
80
68 68
70 61 61
60 51 51
50 42
40
30
20
10
0
MAT0012 MAT0024 MAT1033 All Dev. Math
2.43
non-LinC LinC
(Includes both FTIC and Non FTIC students)
Student Success Findings
Comparison Fall 2004 to Fall 2006 Cohort
FTIC Population Enrolled in Student Success
– Fall 2004 and Fall 2006
Fall 2004 Fall 2006
N = 5027 N = 5834
SLS
27% SLS
32%
Non-SLS
73% Non-SLS
68%
“3-prep” FTIC Population Enrolled in
Student Success – Fall 2004 and Fall 2006
Fall 2004 Fall 2006
N = 1105 N = 1196
SLS
37%
SLS
67%
Non-SLS
Non-SLS 33%
63%
SLS – Fall to Spring Retention Rates
by All FTIC Students
Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts
55%
84% 83%
82% 81%
80%
78%
78%
76%
76%
74%
72%
SLS Non-SLS
% Fall 2004 ret Spring 2005 % Fall 2006 ret Spring 2007
SLS – Fall GPA by
All FTIC students
Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts
55%
2.6 2.56
2.55
2.5
2.45
2.45 2.43
2.39
2.4
2.35
2.3
SLS Non-SLS
Fall 2004 Fall 2006
SLS – Fall to Spring Retention Rates by
“3-prep” mandate students
Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts
55%
90% 80%
77%
80% 69%
70% 65%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
SLS Non-SLS
% Fall 2004 ret Spring 2005 % Fall 2006 ret Spring 2007
SLS – Fall GPA by “3-prep”
Mandate Students
Fall 2004 and Fall 2006 FTIC Cohorts
2.35 2.32
2.3
2.25
2.19
2.2
2.15
2.1 2.05 2.06
2.05
2
1.95
1.9
SLS Non-SLS
Fall 2004 Fall 2006