Embed
Email

session

Document Sample

Shared by: yantingting
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
11/16/2011
language:
English
pages:
156
American Epilepsy Society

Epilepsy in the Elderly:

Old Concepts and New Data





L. James Willmore, MD

Professor, Department of Neurology

Associate Dean

Saint Louis University School of Medicine

Symposium Overview

Introduction to Epilepsy and the Elderly

L. James Willmore, MD

Professor, Department of Neurology, Associate Dean, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO



Before (or after) the Fall: A Practical Rapid Approach

Joseph Flaherty, MD

Associate Professor, Saint Louis University & St. Louis VA GRECC, St. Louis, MO



Diagnosis and Epidemiology

Mark Spitz, MD

Anschutz Center for Advanced Medicine, Denver Veterans Administration Medical Center, Denver, CO



Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions

James Cloyd, PharmD

Professor and Director, Epilepsy Research and Education Program

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN



Cognition and Behavior

John R. Gates, MD

President of the Association of Neurologists of Minnesota

Minnesota Epilepsy Group, PA® St. Paul, MN



Treatment Strategies

A. James Rowan, MD

Professor, Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Bronx VA Medical Center, New York, NY

Symposium Learning Objectives

• Review the importance of appropriate diagnosis of

seizures in the elderly



• Describe current trends in the epidemiology of epilepsy

in the elderly



• Discuss neurobehavioral and cognitive effects of

antiepileptic medications on elderly patients



• Examine the impact of drug interactions and

pharmacokinetic properties of antiepileptic medications

on the elderly epileptic patient



• Identify key issues and treatment strategies in the

management of epilepsy in the elderly

Epilepsy in the Elderly



• Important issues to consider:

• Proper identification and diagnosis

• Physiological changes of aging

• Drug interactions

• Treatment strategies

Before (or after) the Fall:

A Practical Rapid Approach





Joseph H. Flaherty, MD

Associate Professor

Internal Medicine Department

Geriatrics Division

Saint Louis University &

St. Louis VA GRECC

Overview

• Epidemiology (So what?)



• Case (Typical)



• Risk factors, causes and work up (in 15

minutes?)

Falls: Common and Consequential



• ~1/3 of community-dwellers >75 fall/year

• ~1/2 of fallers fall repeatedly

• ~1 in 20 community-dwelling fallers

fracture (~1/6 NH residents)









Rubenstein LZ. Josephson KR. The epidemiology of falls and syncope.

Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 18(2):141-58, 2002 (½ women >85 fall/year)

Thapa PB, et al. Injurious falls in nonambulatory nursing home residents: a comparative study

of circumstances, incidence, and risk factors. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 44(3):273-8, 1996

Falls:

Common and Consequential

MORTALITY

• US: Injury = 6th leading cause of death (age >65)

(falls = 2/3 these injuries)

• US: Hip Fractures = 15% hospital mortality, 33%

one year mortality

• Australia: Accidental falls = 2% all deaths >65









Tinetti ME, et al. Prevention of falls among the elderly. NEJM 320:1055-9;1989

Thapa PB, et al. Injurious falls in nonambulatory nursing home residents: a comparative study

of circumstances, incidence, and risk factors. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 44(3):273-8, 1996

Percent Falling in One Year

Tinetti et al, 1998



100



80



60

%

40



20



0

0 1 2 3 4+

Number of risk factors

Identifying Risk Factors and

Causes of Falls



• Multi-factorial problem

• Evaluate multiple areas

• Multiple interventions

Case Study

An 84-year-old retired high school teacher with a

history of tonic-clonic seizures since age 70 (last

seizure was 4 years ago when she stopped all of her

meds), hypertension, OA (mainly hands, knees R>L)

and insomnia.



Her family is worried because she was admitted to

the hospital after being found down at home and

“they didn’t find anything except a urine infection.”

Since being home (2 weeks) she has fallen twice.

She says, “I just fall.” No LOC, but admits to

“dizziness…yes, well, kind of, but also I just feel

unsteady.”

Case Study

• phenytoin Exam: Frail appearing, having

• diltiazem lost 6 pounds since

• furosemide hospitalization

(ht 5’3”, wt 106#);

• lorazepam SBP drops 25 mmHg from a

• amitriptyline supine to a standing position,

• Tylenol-PM, pulse increases from 68 to 80.

• famotidine “Puffy” ankles. MMSE is 22/30

• calcium (she is a college graduate).

• colace

A

G Risk Factors

A & Causes

I’ of Falls

I F

V ….

N A

E in a 15 minute

L

L office visit

E

N

A

G

A

I’ Risk Factors

I F

V & Causes

N A

E of Falls

L

L  find them

 fix them

E  or get rid of them

N

A = Again….If you fall once,…

G

A

I

N



I’

V

E



F

A

L

L

E

N

A

G = Gait & Balance

A

I

N Evaluation:

“Get up and go”

I’ 1-leg stand

V (RR 2.13 for injurious falls)

E Tandem or near-tandem



F

A

L

L Podsiadlo D, et al. “The Timed “Up & Go”: J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142-148, 1991

E Bohannon RW, et al. Decrease in time balance test scores with aging.

Phys Ther 64:1067-1070, 1984



N Lord SR, et al. Lateral stability, sensorimotor function and falls in older people.

J Am Geriatr Soc 47:1077-1081, 1999 Vellas B, et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997

A

G

A = ADL impairment (function)

I

N



I’

V

E



F

A

L

L

E Tinetti ME, et al. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the

N community. NEJM 1988

Tinetti ME, et al. Fall risk index for elderly patients based on number of chronic

disabilities. Am J Med 1986

Change in ADL Function

during Hospitalization



Decline Same Improve Total

n=320 n=656 n=96 N=1072

31% 59% 10% 100%









1279 Community dwelling older persons (>70); 5 hospitals; Acute

medical illnesses OUTCOMES: Change in Function during

hospitalization & Function at 3 months after hospitalization Sager: Arch

Intern Med, Volume 156(6).March 25, 1996.645-652

Change in ADL Function

3 Months AFTER Hospitalization

Decline Same Improve Total

31% 59% 10% 100%

n=320 n=656 n=96 N=1072



3 months

Decline 130 (41%) 56 (9%) 22 (23%) 208 (19%)

Same 157 (49%) 573 (87%) 15 (16%) 745 (70%)



Improve 33 (10%) 27 (4%) 59 (61%) 119 (11%)

A

G

A

I = Illness (acute)

N



I’

Up to 1 out of 3 patients

V

E

Fall is a DELIRIUM equivalent

F

A

L

L

E

Bourdel-Marchasson I, et al. Delirium symptoms and low dietary intake in older inpatient

N are independent predictors of institutionalization. J Gerontol 2004.

Morley JE. http://www.cyberounds.com/conf/geriatrics/ 1999-08-05/

1 2







or

3 Combination

Causes



Drugs

Eyes, Ears

Low O2 States (MI,Stroke,PE)

Infection

Retention (Urine or Feces)

Ictal

Under hydration, Under nutrition

Metabolic

Subdural

Restraints?

• More harm than “protection”









-Neufeld RR, et al. JAGS 1999 -Capezuti E, et al. J Gerontol 1998

-Dunn KS. J Gerontol Nursing 2001 -Powell C, et al. Can Med Ass J 1989

A

G

A

I

N = Number & Type of Drug



I’

V

>4 of any type is a risk factor.

E



F

A

L

L

E

N

Leipzig RM, et al J Am Geriatr Soc 47:40-50, 1999

Type of Drug



Type Pooled odds ratio

(95% Confidence Interval)



Any psychotropic use 1.73 (1.52 – 1.97)

Neuroleptics (outpatient use) 1.66 (1.38 – 2.00)

Sedative/hypnotics 1.54 (1.40 – 1.70)

Any antidepressant 1.66 (1.4 – 1.95)

Benzodiazepines 1.48 (1.23 – 1.77)





Leipzig RM, et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 47:30-39, 1999



Notes: Psychotropic medication data from meta-analysis, 40 studies, none randomized.

-Groups: age 75, fallers 35% = did not affect pooled OR.

-Increased falls in patients on 2 or more psychotropic

-No difference between long and short acting benzodiazepines

Type of Drug

Type Pooled odds ratio (95% Confidence Interval)



Type Ia antiarrhythmics 1.59 (1.02 – 2.48)

Digoxin 1.22 (1.05 – 1.42)

Thiazide diuretic 1.06 (0.97 – 1.16)

Loop diuretic 0.90 (0.73 – 1.12)



B-blockers 0.93 (0.77 – 1.11)

Centrally acting antihypertensives 1.16 (0.87 – 1.55)

ACE inhibitors 1.20 (0.92 – 1.58)

Calcium channel blockers 0.94 (0.77 – 1.14)

Nitrates 1.13 (0.95 – 1.36)



Narcotics 0.97 (0.78 – 1.20)



Leipzig RM, et al J Am Geriatr Soc 47:40-50, 1999



Cardiac and analgesic medication data from meta-analysis, 29 studies, none randomized.

Type of Drug:

Risk for hip fracture

Type Pooled odds ratio

(95% Confidence Interval)



SSRIs 2.4 (2.0 – 2.7)

TCAs (secondary-amine) 2.2 (1.8 – 2.8)

TCAs (tertiary amines) 1.5 (1.3 – 1.7)









Case-control study, n=8239, age >65, admitted to hospital for hip fracture.

Liu B, et al. Use of SSRI’s and TCA’s and risk of hip fractures in elderly people. Lancet

351: 1303-7, 1998

With adjustment for potential confounding effects by concomitant drug use and

comorbidity, adjusted OR for hip fracture.

A

G In addition to Fall as a DELIRIUM

A Equivalent, Dementia is a risk factor

I for falls.

N



I’ = Impaired Cognition

V

E

Tinetti, Tinetti,

F 1986 1988

A n=79 N=272

L

L RR 2.0 2.3

E

N

A

G

A

I

N



I’

V = Vestibular dysfunction

E

Possible age related decline in balance due to

F accumulation of minute calciferous granules

A within the stratoconic membrane

L

L Meds leading to vest. Dysfunction (AGs,

E aspirin, furosemide, alcohol)

N

Tinetti ME, et al. NEJM 1989

A Age-related changes:

G visual acuity

A adaptation to dark

I peripheral vision

N contrast sensitivity

accommodation

I’

V Common disorders:

E = Eyes and Ears Cataracts

Macular Degeneration

F Glaucoma

A

L One of the most common

L reason for hearing deficit in

E NH Cerumen

N

A

G

A

I Calluses

N

Bunions

I’ Poor fitting shoes

V

Thick or long toe nails

E



F = Feet

A

L

L

E

N

A

G

A

I

N



I’

V

E



F

A = Alcohol

L

L

E

N

A One of the strongest RR for falls

G Tinetti, Robbins, Lipschitz, Tinetti,

A 1986 1989 1991 1988

I n=79 n=149 n=126 N=272

N RR 5.4 8.4 4.9 2.4





I’

V

E



F

A

L = Lower extremity weakness

L

E

N

A Lipsitz LA. Syncope in the elderly.

G Ann Intern Med 1983

A (Postprandial hypotension)

I

Tinetti, Lipschitz, Tinetti,

N

1986 1991 1988

n=79 n=126 N=272

I’

V RR 3.4 NS NS

E



F

A

L

L = Low blood pressure (or OH)

E

N

A

G

A

I

N



I’

V

E



F

A

L

L

E = Environment

N

A

G

A

I

N



I’

V

E



F

A

L

L

E

N = Neurological

A

Again

G

Gait & Balance

A

ADL impairment

I Impaired cognition

N Number and Type of Meds



I’ Illness (Acute)

V Vestibular function

E Eyes, Ears



F Feet

A Alcohol

L Lower extremity weakness

Low blood pressure (or OH)

L

Environment

E

Neurological

N

Case Study

An 84-year-old retired high school teacher with a

history of tonic-clonic seizures since age 70 (last

seizure was 4 years ago when she stopped all of

her meds), hypertension, OA (mainly hands,

knees R>L) and insomnia.



Her family is worried because she was admitted

to the hospital after being found down at home

and “they didn’t find anything except a urine

infection.” Since being home (2 weeks) she has

fallen twice. She says, “I just fall.” No LOC, but

admits to “dizziness…yes, well, kind of, but also I

just feel unsteady.”

Case Study



Medications Exam: Frail appearing,

having lost 6 pounds since

• phenytoin

hospitalization

• diltiazem (ht 5’3”, wt 106#);

• furosemide SBP drops 25 mmHg from a

• lorazepam supine to a standing

• amitriptyline position, pulse increases

• Tylenol-PM from 68 to 80. “Puffy”

• famotidine ankles. MMSE is 22/30 (she

• calcium is a college graduate).

• colace

Identifying Risk Factors and

Causes of Falls

• Can we prevent falls?

• Can we prevent fall-related injuries?









Gillespie LD, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. The

Cochrane Library 2002;4

AGS, BGS, AAOS Panel on Falls Prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:664-72, 2001

Intervention: MultiD, multifactorial,

health/environmental risk factor

screening/intervention programs

# Trials N Population RR (CI)



4 1,651 Unselected .73

(.63 – .85)

5 1,176 H/o falls or fall .86

risk factor (.76 – .98)

1 439 Residential .60

care facilities (.5 – .73)

Intervention: Muscle strengthening and

balance retraining*





# Trials N Population RR (CI)



3 566 Community .80

(.66 – .98)





*individually prescribed at home by trained professional

Intervention: Tai Chi (15 Weeks)





# Trials N Population RR (CI)



1 200 Community .51

(.36 – .73)

Intervention: Home Hazard assessment

and modification





# Trials N Population RR (CI)



3 374 H/o falls .66

(.54 – .81)





*individually prescribed at home by trained professional

Intervention: Withdrawal of

Psychotropic Medications





# Trials N Population RR (CI)



1 93 Community .34

(.16 – .74)

Interventions

A

Again  Target

G

Gait & Balance  PT/exercises if eval +

A  OT

ADL impairment

I Impaired cognition Dementia w/u

N Number and Type of Meds Stop, furosemide,

lorazepam, amitriptylin,

Tyl-PM, famotidine, phenytoin

I’ Illness (Acute)

Consider acute illness

V Vestibular function (eg delirium)

E Eyes, Ears



F Feet

A Alcohol

L Lower extremity weakness  Strengthening ex. If eval +

Low blood pressure (or OH)  Stop meds as above

L

Environment  Home OT eval

E Neurological

N

Thank you for your attention.

Epilepsy Beginning in the Elderly

Epidemiology and Diagnosis





Mark C. Spitz, MD

Anschutz Center for Advanced Medicine

Denver Veterans Administration Medical Center

Epilepsy Beginning in the Elderly



• Not rare

• Brain tumors are overrated

• Cerebrovascular cause underrated

• Demographics different than younger

people

• Often misdiagnosed

Incidence of Epilepsy

Elderly (>65 years)



• Incidence of Alzheimer's 123/100,000

• Incidence of Epilepsy 134/100,000









Olmsted County Data

Extended Care Facilities



• Important target population

• 6% of patients have epilepsy diagnosis

• Frequent comorbidities

• Multiple medications

Demographics



• Different for younger people with epilepsy

Etiology Of Epilepsy, Age 65 +





Idiopathic 51%



Stroke 38%



Degenerative 12 %



Tumor 5%



Trauma 2 %



Infection 2%







Hauser et. al.

Stroke As A Cause Of Epilepsy



• Annual Incidence of Stroke

(Williams, 2001)

• 750,000 in U.S. (1996)

• Seizures after Stroke Cooperative Study

(Bladin, 2000)

• Prospective, 9-month follow-up, n=2021

• Seizures in 8.9%

• 2.3% recurrent seizures

Seizures in Alzheimers



• Autopsy verified, n=81

• 10% had seizures









Hauser, 1986

Epilepsy in the Elderly:

Seizure Type

• Complex Partial 38%

• Generalized Tonic-Clonic 27%

• Simple Partial 14%

• Mixed 20%









VA Co-op 2003

n=593

Epilepsy in the Elderly:

Concurrent diseases

• Hypertension 64%

• Stroke 53%

• Cardiac Disease 49%

• Diabetes 27%

• History of Cancer 22%









VA Co-op 2003

n=593

Epilepsy in the Elderly:

Imaging

• Normal 18%

• CVA 44%

• Small vessel disease 40%

• Diffuse atrophy 35%

• Encephalomalacia 9%









VA Co-op 2003

n=593

Epilepsy in the Elderly:

EEG

• Normal 31%

• Epileptiform 39%

• Focal Slow 40%

• Generalized Slow 16%









VA Co-op 2003

n=593

Epilepsy in the Elderly



• Epilepsy in the elderly is often

misdiagnosed

Delay In Diagnosis

VA Co-op Subset

(n=167), 2003

• 9 months to seek medical attention

• 1.7 years to correct diagnosis

• GTC: immediate diagnosis in 67%

• Less dramatic seizures often ignored

• Concomitant cardiac or cerebrovascular

disease caused delays in diagnosis

Spitz, et al

Diagnosis of Epilepsy:

Elderly Compared to Younger People

• Higher percentage of partial seizures

• More extra-temporal onset complex partial

seizures (missing classic auras)

• More prominent post-ictal symptoms

• Weaker historians

• EEG less helpful

• More concomitant illnesses

Ocham’s Razor



• Explain all of the patient’s complaints by a

single diagnosis

Some Diagnostic Dilemmas



• GTC vs. syncope

• Complex partial seizure vs. TIA

• Transient Global Amnesia

GTC Compared to Syncope

GTC Syncope

•History of Cardiac Disease Common Common

•Positional Variable Orthostatic

•Warning Variable Pre-syncope

•Tongue biting Common Unlikely

•Complexion Normal Pale

•After Event Confused, sleepy Alert

•Movements Tonic-clonic Loss of tone,

brief clonic

movements

•Duration 1-2 minutes seconds to

then post-ictal minutes

•Incontinence varies varies

Complex Partial Seizures Compared to

TIA

CPS TIA

•Hx of CV Disease Common Common

•Anatomic distribution Not Vascular Vascular

•Confusion,

unresponsiveness Present Absent

(may be aphasic)

•Frequency Can be frequent Rarely frequent

•Amnesia Common Absent

•“Aura” Common Absent

•Automatisms Common Absent

Transient Global Amnesia



• Etiology is controversial

• Ischemic

• Venous Stasis

• Migrainous

• Transient epileptic amnesia

• Multiple etiologies are likely

• Epileptic cause is underdiagosed

Transient Epileptic Amnesia



• Classic literature considers it an

uncommon subset of Transient Global

Amnesia (5-10%)

• Features

• Recurrent Spells

• EEG

• Additional presence of obvious seizure

• Responsive to AED

Transient Global Amnesia



• Are many of these cases a one-time

expression of transient epileptic amnesia?

TGA Diagnostic Criteria

Proposed by Caplan, Hodges, and Warlow



• An attack must be witnessed by an observer who can

provide additional information

• Anterograde amnesia must be present

• No clouding of consciousness or loss of personal identity

• Cognitive impairment is limited to amnesia, no apraxia,

or aphasia

• No recent history of head trauma, no history of seizures

in the preceding 2 years

• There are no focal neurologic signs, and no epileptic

features

Transient Global Amnesia



• Annual incidence of 3.4 to 5.2 per 100,000

each year, 23.5 per 100,000 > 50 years

old

• Middle-aged or elderly, but otherwise

healthy

• Recurrent attacks 2 weeks - 1 year - 2 years 11 19%

Table 3: Infarct Types on CT in 38 Patients

With Epileptic Seizures After Symptomatic

Supratentorial Brain Infarction

Infarct Type Number of

Patients (%)



Cortical infarct(s) only* 28 (73.7)

Lacunar infarcts(s) only† 6 (15.8)

Cortical and lacunar infarct 2 (5.3)

Cortical and striatocapsular infarct 1 (2.6)

Cortical and watershed infarct 1 (2.6)



* Six had two infarcts

† Three had two infarcts, one had seven infarcts

Consequences of Brain Injury in the

Elderly



• Head injury and stroke

• Behavioral and cognitive consequences

• Epilepsy predisposes to further injury

Epilepsy Treatment in the Elderly



• Monotherapy not possible for 90%+ of patients.

• Typical nursing home patient is on 6-8 medications.

• Choose AEDs with minimal interactions

• e.g. levetiracetam and gabapentin

• Titrate slowly

• Avoid older AEDs with strong induction effects

(phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine)

• Avoid newer AEDs with established adverse

cognitive effects (topiramate and zonisamide)

Topiramate and Zonisamide



• 94% of patients experienced cognitive

viscosity with either drug as an adjunctive

agent*

• 63% of the patients were unaware of the

effect*









Lee S, Sziklas V, Andermann, et al. The effects of adjunctive topiramate on cognitive function in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia,

Vol 44, No 3, 2003: 339-347.

Older AEDs and the Elderly



• Inducing drugs: phenytoin, carbamazepine and

phenobarbital – result in consequences

• Behavioral

• Cognitive

• Valproate - weight gain, risk of encephalopathy. Can

be used, but carefully.

• Phenobarbitol can have significant cognitive

slowing, depression, or other behavioral

consequences

Epilepsy in the Elderly:

Treatment Strategies for

Seizures in the Elderly



A. James Rowan, MD

Professor, Department of Neurology

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

and Bronx VA Medical Center

New York, NY

VA Cooperative Studies Program (VA CSP #428)

Study Co-chairs: R. Eugene Ramsay, MD and A. James Rowan, MD

Treatment of Seizures in the Elderly



Objective:

To determine whether one or both of the

new AEDs (gabapentin and lamotrigine)

have significantly fewer side effects, while

providing equal or possibly better seizure

control, than the current worldwide choice

(carbamazepine) for treatment of seizures in

the elderly.

Admission Criteria

• Inclusion

• Age 60+ yrs (initially 65+ yrs)

• One or more seizures

• None or inadequate AED therapy

• Exclusion

• Allergic to one of the study AEDs

• Severe medical disorder (expected to survive less

than 12 mo)

• Progressive disorder that could affect the

outcome of the study

Target Doses



Carbamazepine (600 mg)







1+ seizure Gabapentin (1500 mg)







Lamotrigine (150 mg)





2-6 wks 1-2 year followup

Study Protocol

• Double-blind, double-dummy (RER and AJR)

• Medication

• Alpha: gabapentin or carbamazepine vs placebo

• Beta: lamotrigine vs placebo

• All patients receive treatment at onset of study

• Target pill count

• Alpha: either 3 or 5

• Beta: 6

• Patients titrated to target dose or maximal

tolerated dose

• Dose lowered if side effect encountered

• Dose increased if patient experienced seizure(s)

Patient Demographics

Screened 1358

Enrolled 593

Age, mean yrs 72.75

Range 59–93

Male/female 570/23

Race

White 418 (70.6%)

Black 143 (24.1%)

Hispanic 30 (5.1%)

American Indian 14 (2.4%)

Dosing Schedule

Number of capsules/tablets

7

6

LTG

5

GBP

4

CBZ

3

2

1

0

1 8 15 22 29 36

Days

Actual vs Target Dose



CBZ GBP LTG

Target dose 600 1500 150

Mean dose

achieved

3 mo 586 1428 145

12 mo 582 1614 152

Outcome Variables



• Primary

• Retention (tolerable side effects and no seizures)

• Seizure-free rate

• Secondary

• Time to nth seizure (1, 2, 5, and 10)

• Toxicity – systemic and neurotoxicity scores

• Cognitive function

• Mood

• Quality of life

Time to Early Termination

Time to Early Termination (cont’d)

1





LTG target dose



0.9

Patient survival









0.8

GBP target dose







0.7 Carbamazepine

CBZ target dose

Gabapentin



Lamotrigine



0.6



0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Weeks

Epilepsy in the Elderly

Outcome at 12 Months (Retention)



Carbamazepine Gabapentin Lamotrigine

12-Mo eligible 197 193 197

12-Month Retention

Completers 72 36.6 % 95 49.2 % 114 57.9 %

Early terminators 125 63.5 % 97 50.3 % 83 42.1 %

p-Values

Overall 0.00011 vs CBZ 0.01063



vs LTG 0.10443



vs CBZ 0.00003

Time to First Complex Partial Seizure

Percent Seizure-Free



3 mo 6 mo 12 mo

253 194 145

ALL

(62.9%) (58.7%) (52.7%)

Ignore sz

301 226 168

before 4

(74.9%) (67.9%) (61.1%)

wks

Ignore sz

322 235 174

before 6

(80.1%) (70.6%) (63.3%)

wks

VA CSP #428

Life Table Analysis

Time-to-First Seizure



Seizure type CBZ GBP LTG

Simple partial 82.7 % 79.2 % 73.1 %

Complex

78.1 % 62.9 % 67.1 %

partial

Generalized

88.1 % 82.2 % 85.9 %

TC

All seizures 59.4 % 41.2 % 46.4 %

p-values = 0.12 all; 0.054 CBZ/GBP; 0.08 CBZ/LTG; 0.78 GBP/LTG

Seizure-Free at 12 Months

Patients Completing 12 Months

Carbamazepine Gabapentin Lamotrigine

Total 70 94 111

Seizure-Free at 12 Mo (12 Mo Completers)

With seizure 25 35.7 % 50 53.2 % 55 49.6 %



Seizure-free 45 64.3 % 44 46.8 % 56 51.4 %

P-Value vs GBP 0.028

vs LTG 0.091

vs 0.674

LTG

Primary Reasons for Termination

n = 361



Adverse reaction to study drug 110 (30.5%)

Voluntary withdrawal 82 (22.7%)

Deceased 35 (9.7%)

Lost to follow-up 26 (7.2%)

Uncontrolled seizures 25 (6.9%)

Poor compliance 23 (6.4%)

Unable to continue medication 22 (6.1%)

Other 38 (10.5%)

Primary Reason for Termination

Carbamazepine Gabapentin Lamotrigine

(n = 198) (n = 195) (n = 200)

Uncontrolled 3 1.52 % 7 3.6 % 7 3.5 %

Side effect 54* 27.3 % 34 17.4 % 20 10.0 %

Noncompliant 7 3.54 % 4 2.1 % 7 3.5 %

Voluntary

12 14.1 % 22 11.3 % 24 12.0 %

w/drawal

Lost to F/U 4 2.0 % 5 2.6 % 6 3.0 %

Death 15 7.6 % 15 7.7 % 9 4.5 %

Other 17 8.6 % 16 8.2 % 14 7.0 %

Total 124* 62.6 % 96 49.3 % 84 42.0 %



* P 4 lb 88 51.5 % 120 67.8 % 87 47.5 %

> 18 lb 5 2.92 % 19 10.7 % 7 3.83 %



Weight loss

> 4 lb 44 25.7 % 37 20.9 % 66 36.1 %



> 18 lb 2 1.17 % 5 2.82 % 7 3.83 %

Causes of Death

Etiology Carbamazepine Gabapentin Lamotrigine

Cardiac 4 3 6

Unknown 3 3 3

Cancer 1 2

Pulmonary 2 2

Sepsis 4

Hepatic failure 1

Internal bleeding 1

Multiple system

1

failure

Stroke,

1

hemorrhagic

“Natural causes” 1

Head injury 1

Total 15 15 9

Effective AED Concentrations

Decrease with Age



Mean Plasma Concentration at Study

Termination

Age (yrs) CBZ (mg/L) VPA (mg/L)

<40 7.8 43.7



40–64 5.7 43.7



65 3.7 31.0

Ramsay 1994. (VA Cooperative Studies #118 and #264.)

Mean AED Plasma Levels

VA Co-op Study #428

Conclusions

• Retention in the study was significantly better for

gabapentin and lamotrigine than for carbamazepine

• Carbamazepine caused significantly more side effects

than lamotrigine or gabapentin, resulting in earlier

termination

• Optimal dose and/or serum levels of AEDs may be lower

in the elderly

• Lamotrigine and gabapentin should be considered as

possible first-line therapy for new onset-seizures in the

elderly

Questions &

Answers

American Epilepsy Society



Related docs
Other docs by yantingting
BestofFairfieldCounty042711
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
article-13071
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Application-Partner-Programs_111910
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Application-Partner-Programs-030810
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
APPLICATION FOR GROUP DISABILITY INSURANCE
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Appendix ___ Information Needs Requirements
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!