Embed
Email

Marketing Plan

Document Sample
Marketing Plan
Shared by: HC11111604523
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
11/15/2011
language:
English
pages:
64
Marketing Plan

Characteristics of a Good Marketing Plan



A good marketing plan should communicate to every

member what is desired of each member, so that they

have some level of goal clarity, understanding of

assumptions that lie behind the goals and the context of

each activity and decision.

Approaches in Marketing Plan



Different organizations follow different kinds of planning

approaches.

Organizations where top management sets both the

goals and plans for the lower management, follows a top

down approach.

In democratic and participative organizations, there is a

bottom up approach in which each unit in the

organization creates its own goals and plans, which are

then approved by the top management.

The third approach is to have goals down-plans up

approach. In this approach the top management sets the

goal but various business units create their own plans to

meet these goals

IMPORTANCE OF MARKETING

PLANNING

It helps in avoiding future uncertainties.

It helps in management by objectives.

It helps in achieving objectives.

It helps in coordination and communication among the

departments.

It helps in control.

It helps the customers in getting complete satisfaction.

STRATEGIC CORPORATE PLANNING BY TOP

MANAGEMENT

Establishing corporate mission, objectives and goals



Establishing Strategic Business Units



Assigning resources to each Strategic Business Unit





Planning for Business Growth.

Establishing Corporate Mission, Objectives

and Goals

It should not be an impossible statement.

It should be short and limited.

It should be motivating.

It should be enough to define the functions, the clientele

and the method of operation.

lt should be clear and should stress the company’s

policy.

It should be distinctive and should define company’s

major competitive scope.

It should indicate how objectives are to be accomplished.

Objective Setting



A higher market share

High growth opportunities

Increased ability to compete in global markets

Product innovation

Recognition as a leader in technology

Better customer services

Good reputation with customers

Low cost compared with competitors

High quality goods and services

Brand image and loyalty

Wider profit margin

Establishing Strategic Business Units



A strategic business unit has the

following characteristics:

Separate responsibility for strategic planning and profit

performance, and profitinfluencing factors.

A separate set of competitors.

Single business or a collection of related businesses,

which offer scope for independent strategic planning

from remaining organization

Resources to SBU Units

BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP

MATRIX

INTRODUCTION



BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP (BCG)

MATRIX is developed by BRUCE

HENDERSON of the BOSTON

CONSULTING GROUP IN THE EARLY

1970’s.



According to this technique, businesses or

products are classified as low or high

performers depending upon their market

growth rate and relative market share.

Relative Market

Share and Market

Growth

To understand the Boston Matrix

you need to understand how

market share and market growth

interrelate.

MARKET SHARE

• Market share is the percentage of the total

market that is being serviced by your company,

measured either in revenue terms or unit volume

terms.



• RELATIVE MARKET SHARE



• RMS = Business unit sales this year

Leading rival sales this year



• The higher your market share, the higher

proportion of the market you control.

MARKET GROWTH

RATE

Market growth is used as a measure of a

market’s attractiveness.



MGR = Individual sales - individual sales

this year last year

Individual sales last year



Markets experiencing high growth are ones

where the total market share available is

expanding, and there’s plenty of opportunity for

everyone to make money.

THE BCG GROWTH-SHARE

MATRIX

It is a portfolio planning model which is based

on the observation that a company’s business

units can be classified in to four categories:

 Stars

 Question marks

 Cash cows

 Dogs



It is based on the combination of market growth

and market share relative to the next best

competitor.

STARS

High growth, High market share



Stars are leaders in business.

They also require heavy investment, to

maintain its large market share.

It leads to large amount of cash

consumption and cash generation.

Attempts should be made to hold the

market share otherwise the star will

become a CASH COW.

CASH COWS

Low growth , High market share



They are foundation of the company and

often the stars of yesterday.

They generate more cash than required.

They extract the profits by investing as

little cash as possible

They are located in an industry that is

mature, not growing or declining.

DOGS

Low growth, Low market share



Dogs are the cash traps.

Dogs do not have potential to bring in

much cash.

Number of dogs in the company should be

minimized.

Business is situated at a declining stage.

QUESTION MARKS

High growth , Low market share



Most businesses start of as question

marks.

They will absorb great amounts of cash

if the market share remains unchanged,

(low).

Why question marks?

Question marks have potential to

become star and eventually cash cow

but can also become a dog.

WHY BCG MATRIX ?



To assess :

 Profiles of products/businesses

 The cash demands of products

 The development cycles of products

 Resource allocation and divestment

decisions

MAIN STEPS OF BCG MATRIX

Identifying and dividing a company into

SBU.

Assessing and comparing the prospects of

each SBU according to two criteria :

1. SBU’S relative market share.

2. Growth rate OF SBU’S industry.

Classifying the SBU’S on the basis of BCG

matrix.

Developing strategic objectives for each

BCG MATRIX WITH CASH FLOW

BENEFITS

BCG MATRIX is simple and easy to

understand.

It helps you to quickly and simply screen

the opportunities open to you, and helps

you think about how you can make the

most of them.

It is used to identify how corporate cash

resources can best be used to maximize a

company’s future growth and profitability.

LIMITATIONS



BCG MATRIX uses only two dimensions,

Relative market share and market growth

rate.

Problems of getting data on market share

and market growth.

High market share does not mean profits

all the time.

Business with low market share can be

profitable too.

PRACTICAL USE

MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA

HLL

IES

BCG MATRIX









scorpio









Jeep

balero

CONCLUSION



Though BCG MATRIX has its limitations it is one

of the most FAMOUS AND SIMPLE portfolio

planning matrix ,used by large companies

having multi-products.

Portfolio Planning:

Four Areas of Emphasis

Allocating resources

Formulating business-unit strategy

Setting performance targets

Analyzing portfolio balance

 Cash flow

 Continuity

 Risk

BCG Growth-Share Matrix

High Star Question Mark







Market

Growth

Cash Cow Dog









Low

Strong Weak

Relative Market Share

Four Main Strategies of the BCG

Model

Increase market share

Hold market share

Harvest

Divest

BCG Growth-Share Matrix:

Quadrant Characteristics

30% Star Question Mark

Earnings: high stable, growing Earnings: low, unstable, growing

Cash flow: neutral Cash flow: negative

Strategy: hold or invest for Strategy: increase market share

growth or harvest/divest

Market

Growth

Cash Cow Dog

Earnings: high stable Earnings: low, unstable

Cash flow: high stable Cash flow: neutral or negative

Strategy: hold or add market Strategy: harvest/divest

-10% share





10 1.0 .1

Relative Market Share

Using the Model: Symbols





Product A Product A

Total Market Previous

Market Share Market Size

and Position









Product B Market

B Smaller but firm

has greater share

Plotting Your SBU’s

30% Star Question Mark

C C

B

Market A

Growth

Cash Cow Dog



A B



-10%

10 1.0 .1

Relative Market Share

Traditional SBU

or Product Path

30% Star Question Mark



2 1

Market

Growth

Cash Cow Dog



3 2



4

-10%

10 1.0 .1

Relative Market Share

• Strategic planning models

- BCG (Boston Consulting Group) model

- Ansoff’s model

- GE model

Business Portfolio Models

A. Boston Consultin Group (BCG) Model



Market Share – Growth Matrix



Hi









Marketing Growth Rate

Star ?









Cash cow Dog



Lo

Hi Lo

B. Ansoff’s Product-Market Development Model









Existing Product New Products



Existing

Market Market Penetration Product Development







New Market Development Diversification

Market

C. G.E Strategic Planning Model

Business Strength

Strong Average Weak









Industry Attractiveness

High





Medium





Low

Business Strength Index Industry Attractiveness Index

* Market Share * Market size

* Price Competitiveness * Market Growth

* Product Quality * Industry Profit Margin

* Customer Knowledge * Amount of Competition

* Sales Force and Effectiveness * Seasonality

* Geographic Advantage * Cost Structure

* Others * Etc.

THE STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS



Assessment and adjustment of core strategy

(market / competitive analysis, internal analysis)





Formulation of global strategy

(choice of target countries, segments and competitive strategy)





Development of global marketing program





Implementation

(organization structure, control)

Michael Porter’s

Five Forces

Model

Michael Porter …







“An industry’s profit potential is

largely determined by the intensity

of competitive rivalry within that

industry.”

Porter’s Five Forces

Portfolio Analysis …





… Strategy at the time (1970s) was focused on two

dimensions of the portfolio grids …

… Industry Attractiveness

… Competitive Position

Business Strength Matrix

Where was

Michael Porter

coming from?

School of Economics …

… at Harvard …

… Exposed Porter to the

Industrial Organization (I0)

sub-field of Economics.

Structural reasons why



… some industries were profitable

* Firm concentration

* Established cost advantages

* Product differentiation

* Economies of scale

Structural reasons …

… all represented barriers to

entry in certain industries,

thus allowing those

industries to be more

profitable than others.

Porters Five Forces …



* Threat of Entry

* Bargaining Power of Suppliers

* Bargaining Power of Buyers

* Development of Substitute

Products or Services

* Rivalry among Competitors

Barriers to Entry …

… large capital requirements or the

need to gain economies of scale

quickly.

… strong customer loyalty or strong

brand preferences.

… lack of adequate distribution

channels or access to raw materials.

Power of Suppliers …

… high when

* A small number of dominant, highly

concentrated suppliers exists.

* Few good substitute raw materials or

suppliers are available.

* The cost of switching raw materials

or suppliers is high.

Power of Buyers …

… high when

* Customers are concentrated, large or

buy in volume .

* The products being purchased are

standard or undifferentiated making it

easy to switch to other suppliers.

* Customers’ purchases represent a

major portion of the sellers’ total

revenue.

Substitute products …

… competitive strength high when

* The relative price of substitute

products declines .

* Consumers’ switching costs decline.

* Competitors plan to increase market

penetration or production capacity.

Rivalry among competitors

… intensity increases

as

* The number of competitors increases

or they become equal in size.

* Demand for the industry’s products

declines or industry growth slows.

* Fixed costs or barriers to leaving the

industry are high.

Summary …

As rivalry among competing

firms intensifies, industry

profits decline, in some

cases to the point where an

industry becomes inherently

unattractive.

The Experience Curve



… as an entry barrier

Unit costs associated with

economies of scale, the learning

curve for labor, and capital-labor

substitution decline with

“experience,” and this creates a

barrier to entry, as new competitors

with no “experience” face higher

costs than established ones.

However …

… If a new entrant has built the

newest, most efficient plant, it

will not have to “catch up.”

… Technical advances purchased

by new entrants – free from the

legacy of heavy past Investments –

may provide those companies a

cost advantage over the leaders.

In addition …

The experience curve barrier can be

nullified by product or process

innovations that create an entirely

new experience curve – one to

which leaders may be poorly

positioned to jump, but to which

new entrants can alight as they

enter the market .

Strategic Groups …

Firms that face similar threats or

opportunities in an industry but

which differ from the threats and

opportunities faced by other

sets of firms in the same

industry (e.g., in the beverage

industry: soft drinks group

versus alcoholic beverages).

Strategic Groups …

Rivalry generally is more

intense within strategic groups

than between them because

members of the same group

focus on the same market

segments with similar products,

strategies and resources.

Industry & Product

Life Cycles

Industry & Product

Life Cycles

Bright Horizons (12 months)


Related docs
Other docs by HC11111604523
CAS LX 522 Syntax I
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Heart of Darkness
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
The H
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Ark1
Views: 25  |  Downloads: 0
Sheet1
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
Deceptive Speech
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
tangos
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
Lag oversikt pr 09.02.09
Views: 43  |  Downloads: 0
Hamlet
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!