FC-DA-2 Revision 1.04 Letter Ballot Comments Database (10-049v0)
Sec/table/fig Status
Company number Tech/Edit Page Comment Proposed Solution Resolution Key
locator
EMC-001 E 3 3.2.13 FC-FS-3 cited without being Add reference to FC-FS-3. A
Review all citations of FC-FS-
2 to determine if FC-FS-3
referenced in Section 2. should be cited instead.
EMC-002 T 19 4.3 g Editors note Resolve issue and remove A
note. Remove the Editor's
Note.
Reference to subclause
4.6 addresses the
setting of the
N_Port/F_Port bit.
EMC-003 T 44 Table 23 GPN_SDFCP is missing from the Add GPN_SDFCP as O
table. Invocable. Maybe add text stating
SCM crapola is only
Invokeable if NSSS bit is
set to one.
Fujitsu-001 E R
pdf page 31, Figure 2 has an arrow The diagram is not a
coming into each of the top boxes state machine and the
that are unlabeled. From the text it arrows indicate the
would appear that the one going into step(s) may be entered
box a) should have the label from another step.
"N_Ports" and the one going into box
c) should have the label "NL_Ports".
Cisco-001 E 3 and 4 Officers are not up to date Update A
Cisco-002 T 4.6 The tables referring to common Update all tables A
service parameters and class specific
parameters are not up to date. They
refer to so obsoleted features
nowadays lost, while some of the
new features (e.g., security bit,
Simplified configuration bit) are
missing.
Cisco-003 T Table 18 This table not up to date. It refers to Update A
obsoleted ELSs (e.g., FARP), while
more modern ELSs are missing (e.g.,
EVFP)
Cisco-004 T Table 23 This table not up to date. It refers to Update A
obsoleted functions (e.g., IP
addresses in the Name Server), while
more modern functions are missing
(e.g., Permanent Port_Name)
1 of 3
Sec/table/fig Status
Company number Tech/Edit Page Comment Proposed Solution Resolution Key
locator
Cisco-005 T 4.13 This subclause is written in a way not Update the clause to be A
consistent with the VN_Port model consistent with the VN_Port
now specified in FC-FS-3. model.
Cisco-006 T general functions and references to class 1, Update A
4, and 6 should be removed
Color Key:
Red - editor to research or working group needs to discuss
Yellow - working group action item
Pink - editor to incorporate
Purple - complete
Keys:
Open: An action has
been identified and is not
Summary 10 All O complete
Accepted: The issue has
been resolved and the
resolution indicates any
0 All Open A necessary changes
Rejected: The issue has
been rejected, and the
resolution indicates the
reason. The resolution
may also indicate
changes found useful to
improve the readability of
0 All Accepted R the standard
Withdrawn: The
commenter has
0 All Rejected W withdrawn the comment.
0 All Withdrawn Not considered yet
Accepted in Principle:
The comment issue has
been accepted in
principle and the
resolution indicates any
necessary changes
0 All Accepted in Principle AinP
#REF! All Not Processed
7 All Technical
2 of 3
Sec/table/fig Status
Company number Tech/Edit Page Comment Proposed Solution Resolution Key
locator
#REF! All Open Technical
#REF! All Accepted Technical
#REF! All Rejected Technical
#REF! All Withdrawn Technical
#REF! All Not Processed Technical
3 All Editorial
#REF! All Open Editorial
#REF! All Accepted Editorial
#REF! All Rejected Editorial
#REF! All Withdrawn Editorial
#REF! All Not Processed Editorial
3 of 3