Embed
Email

TaskForReport_in situ

Document Sample

Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/15/2011
language:
English
pages:
5
Eighth meeting of the Steering Committee: Item 4 - Programme Evaluation







REPORT OF THE TASK FORCE ON

WILD SPECIES CONSERVATION IN GENETIC RESERVES



Nigel Maxted, September 2001



Report of activities

The Task Force was established as a recommendation of the ECP/GR Steering

Committee, during its seventh meeting in 1998, to initiate activities within the

framework of a Technical Cooperation Network for Phase VI, and agreed on a budget

to for one meetings (to be held jointly with the On-farm Conservation and

Management Task Force) and produce a publication of the proceedings. The first

Task Force meeting was held in Isola Polvese, Italy between 18-20 May 2000, the

task force was composed of eleven members, with Nigel Maxted as Chair and

supported by the ECP/GR secretariate. The members are detailed below:



Yehoshua Anikster Israel

Mats Gustafsson Sweden

Inger Hjalmarsson Sweden

Jose Iriondo Spain

Nigel Maxted United Kingdom

Vladimir Meglic Slovakia

Martine Mitteau France

Valeria Negri Italy

Stelios Samaras Greece

Zdenek Stehno Czech Republic

Ruth Wingender Germany







During its first inaugural meeting in Isola Polvese, the Task Force agreed several

work-plans; progress towards meeting the goals of these work-plans is reviewed

below:



Theme 1 - Inventory of Genetic Reserve Conservation Projects of PGRFA in

Europe



1. Short-term: circulate a questionnaire within the In Situ Network members

during the meeting and revise the presentation on this for inclusion in the

workshop publication.

i Achieved.

2. Longer-term: circulate the questionnaire more broadly to all European countries

via various newsletters and networks (Nigel Maxted / 6 months), these will

include.

i Achieved - Circulated questionnaire with IPGRI Regional Newsletter for

Europe and Optima Newsletter.

ii Both questionnaires elicited a very poor response, indicating there are

only approximately ten protected area in Europe where the management

regime is focused on in situ plant genetic conservation.



3. Collation and analysis of information on wild Species conserved in genetic

reserves in Europe. Publication of the information via the ECP/GR website.

i Not achieved – Because of the relatively small number of reserves

involved it was not felt worthy of publication.

4. When contacting ECP/GR National Coordinators for the details concerning

genetic reserves in their countries, they will also be asked to clarify which

agency and who is the named person responsible within that agency for in situ

conservation of PGRFA in their country (ECP/GR Secretariat).

i Not achieved



Theme 2: Preliminary list of priority target species for in situ conservation



1. Maintain a watching brief on the generation of novel lists of PGRFA species in

Europe.

i Not achieved – The revision of the Heywood and Zohary list of PGRFA

species in Europe was included as an integral part of the research and

thematic network projects discussed below.



Theme 3: List of guidelines for practical implementation of genetic reserve

conservation



1. The On-farm Conservation and Management Task Force is asked to consider

the conservation of wild and weedy species along with the traditional varieties

of crops in on-farm conservation projects

i Achieved – request made during the workshop.

2. Compilation of existing guidelines for the establishment and management of

genetic reserves for the conservation of wild PGRFA species.

i Not achieved.

3. Once the list of existing genetic reserves in Europe is available (see Session 1),

an attempt will be made to elucidate the establishment and management

methodologies utilised. Publication of the information via the ECP/GR Internet

page or hard-copy guidelines by IPGRI

i Not achieved – This was included as an integral part of the research

projects discussed below.

4. Novel genetic reserves should be encouraged to incorporate an element of

experimentation with establishment and management guidelines

i Achieved



Theme 4: Identification of research elements to study genetic diversity

1. The compilation of a bibliographic list of research papers related to the genetic

reserve conservation of wild PGRFA species. Publication of the information

via the ECP/GR Internet pages.

i Not achieved

2. The compilation of a bibliographic list of research papers related to

mathematical modelling systems for predicting changes as a result of reserve

management interventions. Publication of the information via the ECP/GR

Internet pages.

i Not achieved

3. The various products of the task force (listed above) should be collated and

published by IPGRI, as they have much wider relevance than to just the task

force members within Europe.

i Not achieved

4. The task force should reconvene in two years time. Funding for such a meeting

will be incorporated into any funding application made by members of the

group.

i Not achieved – This was included as an integral part of the research

projects discussed below.

5. A list server should be established for the In Situ Network to encourage

discussion of genetic reserve and on farm issues.

i Not achieved





Theme 5 - Genetic Reserve Conservation Research Proposals



1. Ammiad genetic reserve

a. IPGRI will write formally to the appropriate authorities in Israel and stress to

them the importance of maintaining this reserve for wild wheat conservation, as

well as the need to continue the established long-term research programme at

the site (IPGRI and ECP/GR Secretariat / 1 month). IPGRI will also assist in

locating potential funding sources to secure the future of the reserve.

i Achieved



2. Strategic, species comprehensive proposal

a. Revise project document in the light of discussion at the workshop.

i Achieved

b. Identify additional project partners to the members of the genetic reserve task

force drawn as broadly as possibly from throughout Europe, but partners must

be interested in genetic conservation and PGRFA.

i Achieved

c. Arrange a visit to the European Commission in Brussels to investigate sources

of EU funding for the project

i Achieved

- Visit made to EC Brussels to discuss the strategic research grant

applications on the 13th Sept 2000

- Meeting of In Situ Conservation of European Crop Relative research

in Rome December 2000

- Visit made to European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and

Biodiversity (EEA) and EC Brussels to discuss the strategic thematic

network grant applications on the 30th July 2001

d. Investigate non-EU sources of funding for the project.

i Not achieved

e. Submit grant application for In Situ Conservation of European Crop Relatives

i Achieved.

- First Application - Research and Development grant application

submitted to Fifth Framework Programme for Energy, Environment

and Sustainable Development - Key action 2 ‘Global change, climate

and biodiversity’ - 2.2.3 ‘Assessing and conserving biodiversity’

- Submission date: 13.02.01

- Title: In Situ Conservation of European Plant Genetic Resources

- Objective: The European Community Biodiversity Strategy

acknowledges that a critical loss of species and genetic biodiversity

is occurring in Europe at present. It also states that conserving

European biodiversity is being seriously hampered by a lack of

biodiversity data. The project will address this problem by for the

first time collecting vital ecogeographic data for the socio-

economically important species native to Europe. The proposed

project will apply the multidisciplinary skills required to assess,

quantify and monitor plant genetic resources (200 wild species from

14 families related to crop plants) in Europe and thus improve the

monitoring of long-term trends, enhance future utilisation and

European wealth creation.

- Cost: € 2,200,331

- Status: Unsuccessful

- Second Application – Thematic Network grant application submitted

to Fifth Framework Programme for Energy, Environment and

Sustainable Development - Key action 2 ‘Global change, climate and

biodiversity’ - 2.2.3 ‘Assessing and conserving biodiversity’

- Submission date: 15.10.01

- Title: European Wild Plant Diversity Assessment & Conservation

Forum

- Objective: PGR Forum’s objective is to provide a European forum

(Network of Excellence) for the assessment of taxonomic (species)

and genetic diversity of European wild crop relative plant genetic

resources and develop appropriate methodologies that can be applied

to conserve their genetic diversity.

- Cost: € 300,000

- Status: Still to be submitted



3. Species Specific Cereal Project Proposal

a. Writing project document for genetic reserve conservation of wild wheat, barley

and oats in Europe

i Not achieved

b. Investigate potential European project partners

i Not achieved

c. Collate existing ecogeographic and genetic information

i Not achieved

d. Investigate possible sources of project funding

i Achieved – During visits to EC Brussels on 13th Sept 2000 and 30th July

2001 funding under 1467 was discussed.

e. Establish genetic reserves to conserve wild wheat, barley and oat genetic

diversity in Europe, with possibly locations in Israel, Turkey, Greece, etc.



4. Species Specific Brassica Project Proposal

a. Writing project document for genetic reserve conservation of wild Brassicas in

Europe

i Not achieved

b. Investigate potential European project partners

i Not achieved

c. Collate existing ecogeographic and genetic information

i Not achieved

d. Investigate sources of project funding

i Achieved – During visits to EC Brussels on 13th Sept 2000 and 30th July

2001 funding under 1467 was discussed.

e. Establish genetic reserves to conserve wild Brassicas in Europe

i Not achieved





Structure And Functioning Of The Task Force

Like other ECP/GR task forces the active function is hindered by the lack of funds

and funding opportunities. A major effort, with full ECP/GR Secretariat, has been

focused on obtaining external funding for the research projects envisaged as Task

Force actions – when this funding is obtained many of the priority actions outlined

above will be achieved.

The task force has operated largely in isolation from the bulk of other ECP/GR

activities, mainly because of lack of interest and/or expertise in common with most

active members in the network. But it is felt this is a weakness of the Network as a

whole and certainly collaboration with the other Task Forces is considered essential

The existence of the Task Force has allowed those members in ECP/GR, who have an

interest in in situ genetic reserve conservation to come together and discuss future

plans and has provided a platform for funding applications, two thus far focusing in

the strategic area with another three crop specific applications planned.



Future Planning

It is proposed to maintain this Task Force on its current modest budget on the

assumption that one or more of the project proposals can be funded, resulting in active

in situ genetic reserve conservation of European Wild Crop Relatives.



Other docs by Stariya Js @ B...
Lab2_Fishing_lab_pack
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
JMK sample legal brief
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
DriveQ
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
cybersecurity_reform_-_senate_bill_eyes
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Opening and Marketing
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Making_it_Work_notes
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
First Announcement 7th ISFS_
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
as90173
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
VNAfashionshow2010
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!