Embed
Email

Promotion Board Update

Document Sample

Shared by: linzhengnd
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
11/14/2011
language:
English
pages:
34
WALTER REED ARMY

INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH









COL David W. Craft PhD D(ABMM)

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

Promotion Board Update







FY10 Major AMEDD Board

Secretariat for

OVERVIEW



Our Mission

• Conduct all centralized active

component officer selection boards

• Provide administrative and



technical support to DA Selection

Boards

• Coordinate membership for DA



Selection Boards

OVERVIEW



The Sec Army’s MOI

• Provides MAX & MIN selection

ENCLOSURES

capability



• Provides Special Skill Requirements

• Authority for Board

SEC ARMY

• Board Mission

COVER

• Defines Zones of Consideration

MEMO

• OER Cut-off Authority



• Additional Guidance from SA as required



(OER, Training Base, Reserve Component Duty)



• Joint Duty Goals



• EO Information

OVERVIEW



Board Member Selection



Statute (Title X) Requires: Army Policy Requires:



 5 or more active duty members  Branch representation

 Senior to officers being  Ethnic and female

considered representation

 Reserve officer representation  LTC (O5) or above

 Joint representation  50% O5/O6 CSL

 Cannot sit 2 consecutive Commander

boards

BOARD OPS



Board Room Procedures and Security

• No personal knowledge allowed*



All board members & a recorder must be present





for board discussions, deliberations and decisions



• No informal office visits (to include career

managers)

• No visitors allowed in the board room



• All board related material & discussion

stays in the board room

BOARD OPS

(AR 600-8-29)



Fully Qualified Best Qualified

100% Select Rate Capability Numerical Constraints







“… qualified professionally Fully qualified officers who



and morally to perform the “meet specific branch,



duties expected of an functional area or skill



officer in the next higher requirements”… to meet the



grade.” Needs of the Army.



(SELCON) (Command & most promotion boards)

BOARD OPS



Board Member Voting



Word

MOI

+ + + Picture

1 - 6+

CONVENING BOARD FILE SCORING

BOARD MEMBER

AUTHORITY’S MOI CRITERIA

EXPERIENCE &

JUDGMENT









= VOTE

BOARD OPS









• Phase I - In/Above Zone Voting (FQ)

• Phase II - BZ Voting

• Phase III - Comparison & Requirements

• Phase IV - Show Cause

• Phase V - Paperwork

PHASE I

Identify Fully Qualified Officers





• Vote Files (1 thru 6 +/-)

• ID Possible Show Cause Cases

• Establish OML



• Establish Fully Qualified Line

Word Picture (IAZ)

Top Few



6 +/- Superior Performer FULLY QUALIFIED

Superior Potential

Select Ahead of Peers

5 +/- Outstanding Performer FULLY QUALIFIED

Outstanding Potential

Select with Peers

4 +/- Solid Performer FULLY QUALIFIED

Good Potential

Select if there is a Requirement

3 +/- Average Performer/Potential

FULLY QUALIFIED



Do not Select NOT FULLY QUALIFIED

2 +/- Weak Performer





Show Cause NOT FULLY QUALIFIED

1

PHASE I

Identify Fully Qualified Officers



1

MAX

FULLY Score

2

IAZ QUALIFIED 3

4

Population 5

6

7

8

9

10

11



• Determine “FQ” line 12

13 MIN

NOT FULLY 14 Score

QUALIFIED 15

PHASE II

Identify Potential BZ Selects

AR 600-8-29 Officer Promotions

1-34b. Below the zone promotions are an

essential part of the promotion system. They are

intended to provide officers of exceptional ability

an opportunity to advance quickly to more

responsible positions, help retain high quality

officers, and give officers an incentive to perform

at their highest level.

PHASE II

Identify Potential BZ Selects



DA MEMO 600-2

• The Army must identify its best officers and

promote them earlier to afford them sufficient

remaining service to be available as our senior

leaders.

•Officers selected from BZ replace those who

otherwise would be promoted from in and

above the promotion zone; therefore, they must

be clearly superior to those who would

otherwise be promoted.

PHASE II

Identify Potential BZ Selects

Screen Vote: Hard Vote:

YES/NO/SC

2-6+/-

18 YES OML # SCORE

17 YES 1 78+13

16 YES 2 77-1

15 YES 3 77-4

14 YES 4 75-1

13 YES BZ MOI Guidance:

5 75

12 YES MIN = 0, MAX= 2 74+7

6

11 YES 7 73-4

10 YES 8 72+3

4 YES 9 72+2

3 YES 10 71-5

2 YES 11 60+1

1 YES 12 55+1

0 YES 13 26

Order of Merit List (OML)

OML

NAME RANK SKILL SCORE

#

Requirements: JONES MAJ A 60+10 1

SMITH MAJ A 60+9 2

Optimum = 10 JAMES MAJ C 60 3

Max BZs = 2 JOHN MAJ B 58 4

DOE MAJ D 58-1 5

SCHMOE MAJ A 58-4 6

KELLY MAJ C 57+9 7

I/AZ GIBSON MAJ C 57+8 8

Comparison Files JACOBS MAJ A 57+7 9

STEWART MAJ B 56+10 10

Phase III: Tentatively BARRETT MAJ D 56+10 10

Best Qualified Line ANDERSON MAJ B 54 12

HARVEY MAJ B 53 13

Phase I: Fully COX MAJ C 53-2 14

MICHAELS MAJ C 29 15

Qualified Line NOT FULLY QUALIFIED

MAYO MAJ AR 27 16

FRITZ MAJ AR 26 17

Phase III:

Identify Best Qualified Officers

BZ OML



IAZ OML

1

2*

2

1

TBQ

9

10

• The lowest scoring BZ officer is

Fully compared against the highest

Qualified scoring I/AZ Officer



• Head to Head comparison

Not Fully

Qualified

Order of Merit List (OML)

OML

NAME RANK SKILL SCORE #

Requirements:

P1 JANSON MAJ C

Optimum = 10 P2 JONES MAJ A 60+10 1

Max = 11 P3 SMITH MAJ A 60+9 2

P4 JAMES MAJ C 60 3

Max BZs = 2

P5 JOHN MAJ B 58 4

I/AZ FILE IS P6 DOE MAJ D 58-1 5

DISPLACED; P7 SCHMOE MAJ A 58-4 6

OFFICER NOT P8 KELLY MAJ C 57+9 7

RECOMMENDED FOR P9 GIBSON MAJ C 57+8 8

PROMOTION

P10 JACOBS MAJ A 57+7 9

P11 STEWART MAJ B 56+10 10



Phase III: BARRETT MAJ D 55 11

ANDERSON MAJ B 54 12

Best Qualified Line

HARVEY MAJ B 53 13

COX MAJ C 53-2 14

MICHAELS MAJ C 29 15

Phase I: Fully MAYO NOT FULLY QUALIFIED 27

MAJ AR 16

Qualified Line FRITZ MAJ AR 26 17

MAY / MAY NOT SUMMARY

Recess (Today) Adjournment Release

Sec A Acts on Results Results Published





Recorder will notify member Specifics of MOI

Procedures, General (as published)

Method of selection

– Concept of ops. (ie Best or Fully Qualified) Statistics

Board composition (as published)

Processes

(Tools for Consistency) (representation, number of What it took to be

– Voting tools members, makeup) selected

– Word picture Name of specific

– Scoring system board served on

– ASBS

• Comments concerning individuals or groups of

individuals made during Deliberations.

File Make-Up

• Relative Standing of any individual or groups of

Contents of Information individuals on the Order of Merit List.

Briefings

• Any Statistical Analysis not published with board

results.

Promotion List MFR

Promotion List MFR

Promotion List MFR

MOI

MOI

MOI

MOI

MOI

MOI

MOI

MOI



Related docs
Other docs by linzhengnd
i-Health
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
State employees recall events of September 11
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
0804050421330_2110
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
Listino2009 - Meetup
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
TwoSurveyCalculator
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Guidelines.xlsx
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
APPALACHIA AND THE OZARKS
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Proliferation Studies
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!