University of Nottingham
The Dark Side of Customer Relationship
Management in the Luxury segment of the Hotel
Industry
Akshay Jaipuria
MA Management
Abstract
Today, service organizations are shifting their focus from “transactional exchange” to
“relational exchange” for developing mutually satisfying relationship with customers.
Extended relationships are reported to have a significant impact on transaction cost and
profitability, and customer lifetime value. Serving the customers, in true sense, is the
need of the hour as the customer was, is and will remain the central focus of all
organizational activities. The hotel industry, especially the luxury segment hotels needs
to be purely customer-centric and focus on the customer needs and duly fulfill them.
Customers will not blindly accept poor service quality from a luxury hotel. They expect
high quality of service in return for the money they spend on luxury hotels. This paper is
an attempt to explain the dark side of CRM in the luxury segment of the hotel industry
with the help of the „gap model‟ available in literature which suggests that gaps in service
occur at various instances. The author explains that the gap model is a useful tool to
explain the dark side partly. There is more to the dark side like privacy issues,
unwillingness of customers to build a relationship with the service provider and changing
tastes and preferences of the customer. Ritz- Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C. has been
chosen as a single case study and the research questions have been addressed for the
industry at large using Ritz- Carlton as a classic example of superior service quality to the
customers. Some simple measures to reduce the dark side have been mentioned, which
addresses the third and last research question.
The project would contribute as a useful guide to luxury hotels, giving them some
valuable information on what the customer expectations are and if they are duly met then
service gaps shall not occur. This paper shall provide scope for luxury hotels to improve
their overall service quality and strengthen their position in the industry. The relevant
existing theory has been reviewed and the subject has been explored, using the „gap
model‟ (Parasuraman et al 1998) mainly. Based on the research findings and analysis,
recommendation has been given to reduce the dark side at Ritz-Carlton and luxury hotels
in general.
1
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... 0
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. 2
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ 4
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................... 7
2.1 WHAT IS CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT? ......................................... 7
2.2 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION, LOYALTY AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE ................... 9
2.3 CRM AND SERVICE QUALITY ............................................................................................13
2.3.1 Customer‟s perception of quality: ................................................................ 13
2.3.2 The Perceived Service Quality approach ..................................................... 16
2.3.3 Gaps between customer expectations and perceptions: ............................... 17
2.3.4 Service Guarantee ........................................................................................ 24
2.3.5 Service Recovery ........................................................................................... 26
2.3.6 Complaints management ..............................................................................................28
2.4 DO ALL CUSTOMERS WANT A RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR SERVICE PROVIDER? .. 29
2.5 SYNOPSIS .......................................................................................................... 31
CHAPTER 3: CRM AND HOTEL INDUSTRY ......................................................... 32
CHAPTER 4: METHODOLOGY AND RESEARCH DESIGN ............................... 34
4.1 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................ 34
4.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................... 34
4.3 RESEARCH DESIGN ............................................................................................. 35
4.4 CASE STUDY: AN INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 36
4.5 HISTORY OF CASE STUDY ................................................................................... 37
4.6 TYPES OF CASE STUDY ..................................................................................... 37
4.7 CHOICE OF CASE: RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY ......................................... 38
4.8 COMPONENTS OF THE CASE STUDY ................................................................... 38
4.9 DATA COLLECTION ...............................................................................................................39
4.9.1 Documentation .............................................................................................. 41
4.9.2 Focus Groups ................................................................................................ 41
4.9.3 Interviews ...........................................................................................................................43
4.10 DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 49
4.11 KEY ISSUES OF DATA COLLECTION: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY ...................... 50
4.12 SYNOPSIS .......................................................................................................... 51
CHAPTER 5: CASE STUDY ........................................................................................ 52
5.1 RITZ-CARLTON: AN OVERVIEW ........................................................................ 52
5.2 RITZ-CARLTON AND THE “GOLD STANDARDS” OF SERVICE QUALITY .............. 54
2
5.2.1 The Credo..................................................................................................... 54
5.2.2 Motto ............................................................................................................. 55
5.2.3 Three Steps of Service .................................................................................. 55
5.2.4 Service Values ............................................................................................... 55
5.2.5 Employee Promise ........................................................................................ 56
5.3 RITZ-CARLTON: CURRENT REALITY .................................................................. 57
CHAPTER 6: RESEARCH FINDINGS ....................................................................... 59
6.1 FOCUS GROUPS FINDINGS ................................................................................... 59
6.1.1 Does the gap model explain the dark side of CRM? ..................................... 59
6.1.2 Is there more to the dark side of CRM than what is explained in the gap
model? ........................................................................................................... 61
6.1.3 How can the dark side of CRM be reduced? ................................................ 62
6.2 IN-DEPTH INTERVIEW FINDINGS ......................................................................... 63
6.2.1 Customer Interviews ..................................................................................... 64
6.2.2 Employee Interviews ........................................................................................ 67
CHAPTER 7: ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH FINDINGS ........................................... 70
7.1 DOES THE GAP MODEL EXPLAIN THE DARK SIDE OF CRM?................................ 70
7.1.1 Ritz-Carlton and the „Gap model‟ ................................................................ 70
7.1.2 General Inference for the luxury hotel sector ............................................... 75
7.2 IS THERE MORE TO THE DARK SIDE OF CRM THAN WHAT IS EXPLAINED IN THE
GAP MODEL? .................................................................................................................. 76
7.2.1 Willingness to build a relationship ............................................................... 76
7.2.2 General Inference for the Hotel Industry...................................................... 79
7.3 HOW CAN THE DARK SIDE OF CRM BE REDUCED? ............................................. 79
CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSION AND FURTHER RESEARCH ................................. 83
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 85
APPENDICES ................................................................................................................. 93
APPENDIX 1 CONSENT FORM ..................................................................................... 93
APPENDIX 2 CRM AND „ATITHI DEVO BHAVA‟......................................................... 94
APPENDIX 3 ................................................................................................................... 97
APPENDIX 4 ................................................................................................................. 100
APPENDIX 5 ................................................................................................................. 108
3
Acknowledgments
Education is a progressive discovery of our ignorance.
Will Durant (1885-1981) U.S. author and historian
I would like to thank all those who helped me through the project phase of the MA
Management program. I would like to express my sincere appreciation to my supervisor,
Prof. Dave Wastell for his enlightenment of my knowledge of CRM and the hotel
industry, valuable advice and kind support throughout the process of dissertation
completion
Most importantly, I would like to thank my parents and sister who were always there to
motivate me. I would also like to thank my close friends at Nottingham for being around
to discuss my ideas and giving me emotional support when I was stressed.
I would like to thank all the focus group members for giving their valuable time and
thoughts to my project.
I would like to thank all the customers and employees of Ritz-Carlton for sharing their
valuable thoughts which helped me shape this project.
Lastly, I would like to thank the academic and library staff at University of Nottingham
for their support throughout this year.
4
Chapter 1: Introduction
In the mid-twentieth century, mass production techniques and mass marketing changed
the competitive landscape by increasing product availability for consumers. However, the
purchasing process that allowed the shopkeeper and customer to spend quality time
interacting with each other was also fundamentally changed. As a result, customers lost
their uniqueness becoming an “account number”. Shopkeepers lost track of their
customers‟ individual needs as the market became full of product and service options.
Many companies today are striving to re-establish their connections to new as well as
existing customers to boost long-term customer loyalty (Chen and Popovich, 2003).
The world has come full circle from selling to marketing and from seller‟s market to
buyer‟s market. The customer today has the option to buy what he thinks he should and
from whom, being in his best interest. Product development, technological improvement,
cost optimization and excellent service facility are very important for any organisation
but their importance is only if the customer appreciates it. For example, both diamond
and coal are carbon but they are priced differently due to different valuations by the
customer. Therefore, any business begins and ends with the customer (Sugandhi, 2002).
Thus, service organizations are shifting their focus from “transactional exchange” to
“relational exchange” for developing mutually satisfying relationship with customers.
Extended relationships are reported to have a significant impact on transaction cost and
profitability, and customer lifetime value. Serving the customers, in true sense, is the
need of the hour as the customer was, is and will remain the central focus of all
organizational activities.
The paper explores “The Dark Side of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) in the
Luxury segment of the Hotel Industry” using the „gap model‟ of Parasuraman et al (1985)
and suggests generic strategies to reduce the dark side. The researcher was motivated to
choose the hotel industry because of his deep rooted passion for luxury hotels. The
importance of this research is that it helped the researcher familiarize himself with the use
of primary with a blend of secondary research to analyze a given situation. This piece of
5
work shall contribute to the academic community as there is not much literature available
on the dark side of CRM for the luxury hotels. It shall also benefit the management of
luxury hotels to understand what the customer expects in terms of service quality.
The aim of this research is to highlight the dark side of CRM in the luxury segment of the
hotel industry using The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company as a classic example of high
service quality. The research objectives are as follows:
1. Does the gap model explain the dark side of CRM?
2. Is there more to the dark side of CRM than what is explained in the gap model?
3. How can the dark side of CRM be reduced?
This paper is divided into seven chapters.
Chapter one is an introduction to the paper.
Chapter two provides the reader with necessary literature available on CRM.
Chapter three provides information on CRM and the hotel industry.
Chapter four discusses the research design including interviews and focus groups that
have been used for primary research.
Chapter five provides an overview of The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company .
Chapter six provides a summary of the research findings.
Chapter seven is an analysis of the research findings addressing the research questions,
one of which provides recommendations to reduce the dark side.
Chapter eight is a conclusion of the paper.
The following chapter provides the literature review.
6
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Modern marketers are rediscovering the ancient mantras for success in corporate world
and blending them with contemporary marketing practices. Long term survival and
competitive advantage can only be attained by establishing an emotional bond with the
customers. A shift is taking place from marketing to anonymous masses of customers to
developing and managing relationships with more or less well known or at least some
identified customers (Gronroos, 1994).
This section shall provide general literature on CRM and its link with customer
satisfaction, customer loyalty and business performance followed by literature on CRM
and service quality in details. The „gap model‟ shall be introduced and literature on
service guarantee, service recovery, and complaint management shall be provided. This
would lead to the privacy issues related with CRM.
2.1 What is Customer Relationship Management?
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) “is the core business strategy that integrates
internal processes and functions, and external networks, to create and deliver value to
targeted customers at a profit. It is grounded on high-quality customer data and enabled
by IT” (Buttle, 2004). CRM is a business strategy to identify, cultivate, and maintain
long-term profitable customer relationships. It requires developing a method to select
your most profitable customer relationships (or those with the most potential) and
working to provide those customers with service quality that exceeds their expectations.
(McDonald, 2002)
An organization‟s survival depends largely on harmonious relationships with its
stakeholders in the market. Customers provide the „life-blood‟ to the organization in
terms of competitive advantage, revenue and profits. Managing relationships with
customers is imperative for all types and size of service organizations. A sound base of
7
satisfied customers allows the organization to move on the path of growth, enhance
profitability, fight out competition and carve a niche in the market place. Bennett (1996)
described that CRM seeks to establish long term, committed, trusting and cooperative
relationship with customers, characterized by openness, genuine concern for the delivery
of high quality services, responsiveness to customer suggestions, fair dealings and
willingness to sacrifice short term advantage for long term gains. Schneider and Bowen
(1999) advocated that service business can retain customers and achieve profitability by
building reciprocal relationships founded on safeguarding and affirming customer
security, fairness and self esteem. It requires that companies view customers as people
first and consumers second. Trust, commitment, ethical practices, fulfillment of promises,
mutual exchange, emotional bonding, personalization and customer orientation have been
reported to be the key elements in the relationship building process (Levitt,1986;
Gronroos, 1994; Morgan,1994; Gummesson,1994; Bejou et al,1998 ).
CRM refers to all business activities directed towards initiating, establishing,
maintaining, and developing successful long-term relational exchanges (Heide, 1994;
Reinartz & Kumar, 2003). One of the results of CRM is the promotion of customer
loyalty (Evans & Laskin, 1994), which is considered to be a relational phenomenon,
(Chow & Holden, 1997; Jacoby & Kyner, 1973; Sheth & Parvatiyar, 1995; cited by
Macintosh & Lockshin, 1997). The benefits of customer loyalty to a provider of either
services or products are numerous, and thus organizations are eager to secure as
significant a loyal customer base as possible (Gefen, 2002; Reinartz & Kumar, 2003;
Rowley & Dawes, 2000). Recent developments in Internet technology have given the
Internet a new role to facilitate the link between CRM and customer loyalty (Body and
Limayem, 2004). It is common knowledge that a dissatisfied and unhappy customer will
share his unfortunate experience more than a satisfied customer. It is also observed that a
fraction of unhappy customers choose to complain while others simply switch their
loyalty to others service providers. Loss of customer is loss of business along with the
opportunity for business growth and profitability. Feedback collection from the customer
is essential for the supplier to ascertain customer satisfaction and scope for improvisation
(Sugandhi, 2002).
8
The fundamental reason for companies aspiring to build relationships with customers is
economic. For survival in the global market, focusing on the customer is becoming a key
factor for companies big and small. Establishing and managing a good customer
relationship is a strategic endeavor. Having a CRM software installed does not ensure a
successful customer relationship. For this to happen business processes and company
culture have to be redesigned to focus on the customer. CRM software can be only a tool
to implement a customer strategy. It is known that it takes up to five times more money to
acquire a new customer than to get an existing customer to make a new purchase.
Improving customer retention rates increases the size of the customer base. Thus,
customer retention is essential.
(Baumeister, unknown).
2.2 Customer satisfaction, loyalty and business performance
The rationale for CRM is that it improves business performance by enhancing customer
satisfaction and driving up customer loyalty (see figure 4). There is a compelling logic to
the model, which has been dubbed the „satisfaction-profit chain‟ (Anderson and Mittal,
2000). Satisfaction increases because customer insight allows companies to understand
their customers better, and create improved customer value propositions. As customer
satisfaction rises, so does customer repurchase intention (Anderson, 1994). This in turn
influences actual purchasing behaviour, which has a significant impact on business
performance.
9
Customer Customer Business
Satisfaction Loyalty Performance
Understanding Behavioural loyalty Revenue growth
customer requirements
Attitudinal loyalty Share of
Meet customer customer
expectations
Customer tenure
Deliver customer
value
Figure 4: Customer satisfaction, customer loyalty and business performance
(Buttle, 2004)
Customer satisfaction has been the subject of considerable research and has been defined
and measured in various ways (Oliver, 1997). Customer satisfaction may be defined as
the customer‟s fulfillment response to a consumption experience, or some part of it.
Customer satisfaction I a pleasurable fulfillment response while dissatisfaction is an
unpleasurable one (Buttle, 2004). Satisfaction and dissatisfaction are two ends of a
continuum, where the location is defined by a comparison between expectations and
outcome. Customers would be satisfied if the outcome of the service meets expectations.
When the service quality exceeds the expectations, the service provider has won a
delighted customer. Dissatisfaction will occur when the perceived overall service quality
does not meet expectations (Looy, Gemmel & Dierdonck, 2003). Sometimes customer‟s
expectations are met, yet the customer is not satisfied. This occurs when the expectations
are low (Buttle, 2005). For example, the customer expects the flight to be late and it gets
late.
10
Customer satisfaction is considered to be one of the most important outcomes of all
marketing activities in a market-oriented firm. The obvious need for satisfying the firm‟s
customer is to expand the business, to gain a higher market share, and to acquire repeat
and referral business, all of which lead to improved profitability (Barsky, 1992). Studies
conducted by Cronin and Taylor (1992) in service sectors such as: banking, pest control,
dry cleaning, and fast food; found that customer satisfaction has a significant effect on
purchase intentions in all four sectors. Similarly, in the health-care sector, McAlexander
et al. (1994) found that patient satisfaction and service quality have a significant effect on
future purchase intentions.
(Kandampully and Suhartanto, 2000)
Customer loyalty can be defines as “customer behavior characterized by a positive
buying pattern during an extended period (measured by means of repeat purchase,
frequency of purchase, wallet share or other indicators) and driven by a positive attitude
towards the company and its products or services” (Looy, Gemmel & Dierdonck, 2003).
Practitioners and researchers have not clearly identified a theoretical framework,
identifying factors that could lead to the development of customer loyalty (Gremler and
Brown, 1997). However, there is a consensus amongst practitioners and academics that
customer satisfaction and service quality are prerequisites of loyalty (Gremler and
Brown, 1997; Cronin and Taylor, 1992). Those technical, economical and psychological
factors that influence customers to switch suppliers are considered to be additional
prerequisites of loyalty (Selnes, 1993; Gremler and Brown, 1997). Recent studies also
indicate that the firm‟s image may influence customer enthusiasm: value, delight, and
loyalty (Bhote, 1996).
(Kandampully and Suhartanto, 2000)
Loyalty behaviors, including relationship continuance, increased scale or scope of
relationship, and recommendation (word of mouth advertising) result from customers‟
beliefs that the quantity of value received from one supplier is greater than that available
from other suppliers. Loyalty, in one or more of the forms noted above, creates increased
11
profit through enhanced revenues, reduced costs to acquire customers, lower customer-
price sensitivity, and decreased costs to serve customers familiar with a firm‟s service
delivery system (Reicheld and Sasser, 1990). Yi‟s “Critical review of customer
satisfaction” (1990) concludes, “Many studies found that customer satisfaction influences
purchase intentions as well as post-purchase attitude” (p. 104).
Customer loyalty can be viewed in two distinct ways (Jacoby and Kyner, 1973). The first
views loyalty as an attitude. Different feelings create an individual‟s overall attachment
to a product, service, or organization (see Fornier, 1994). These feelings define the
individual‟s (purely cognitive) degree of loyalty. The second view of loyalty is
behavioural. Examples of loyalty behaviour include continuing to purchase services from
the same supplier, increasing the scale and or scope of a relationship, or the act of
recommendation (Yi, 1990). The behavioural view of loyalty is similar to loyalty as
defined in the service management literature. In brief, there are two dimensions to
customer loyalty: behavioural and attitudinal (Julander et al., 1997). The behaviour
dimension refers to a customer‟s behaviour on repeat purchases, indicating a preference
for a brand or a service over time (Bowen and Shoemaker, 1998). Attitudinal dimensions,
on the other hand, refer to a customer‟s intention to repurchase and recommend, which
are good indicators of a loyal customer (Getty and Thompson, 1994). Moreover, a
customer who has the intention to repurchase and recommend is very likely to remain
with the company.
(Kandampully & Suhartanto, 2000 and Hallowell, 1996)
Customer attitude being difficult to measure, for financial and practical purposes,
customer retention is widely used as an indicator of customer loyalty. Researchers have
combined both views into comprehensive models of customer loyalty. Dick and Basu
(1994) came up with a two-dimensional model of customer loyalty identifying four forms
of loyalty according to relative attitudinal strength and repeat purchase behavior. The true
loyal are those who have high levels of repeat purchase behavior and a strong relative
attitude. Spuriously loyal customers tend to be more motivated by impulse, convenience
12
and habit i.e. if the conditions are right. Latent loyalty applies to those customers who are
loyal simply because they have no other choice. Lastly, there will always be some
customers who shall not be loyal to any particular brand.
2.3 CRM and Service Quality
Service quality is essential for an organization‟s survival and growth. Interest in service
quality emerged in 1970s. Ever since, the topic has attracted substantial attention among
researchers and practitioners (Gronroos, 2001). Service quality is a form of attitude
representing a long-run, overall, evaluation, which is different from customer satisfaction,
a more short term, transaction specific judgment. The level of customer satisfaction is a
result of the customer‟s comparison of the service quality expected in a given service
encounter with perceived service quality. This implies that satisfaction assessments
require customer experiences while quality does not (Caruana, Money and Berthon,
2000).
2.3.1 Customer‟s perception of quality:
Quality of a particular service is whatever the customer perceives it to be. Service quality
as perceived by the customer may differ from the quality of the service actually
delivered. Services are subjectively experienced processes where production and
consumption activities take place simultaneously. Interactions, including a series of
moments of truth between the customer and the service provider occur. Such buyer-seller
interactions or service encounters have a critical impact on the perceived service. The
Nordic Model, originated by Christian Gronroos and developed by others, adopts a
disconfirmation of expectations approach. This claims that customers have certain
expectations of service performance with which they compare their actual experience. If
the expectations are met, this is confirmation; if they are over performed, this is positive
disconfirmation; if they are underperformed this is negative disconfirmation. According
to Gronroos (1984), the quality of service as perceived by customers has two dimensions;
a technical or outcome dimension and a functional or process-related dimension.
13
What customers receive in their interaction with a firm is clearly important to them and
their quality evaluation. This is one quality dimension, the Technical Quality of the
outcome of the service production process. However, as there are numerous interactions
between the service provider and customers, including various series of moments of truth,
the technical quality dimension will not count for the total quality which the customer
perceives he has received. The customer will also be influenced by the way in which
technical quality- the outcome of the process is transferred to him and this will have an
impact on the process experience. Examples include the accessibility of ATM, a website,
appearance and behavior of waiting staff, how service employees perform their task, what
they say and how they do it. Interestingly, other customers simultaneously consuming
the same or similar services may influence the way in which customers will perceive a
service. Thus, the consumer is also influenced by how he receives the service and how he
experiences the simultaneous production and consumption process. This is the second
quality dimension, the Functional Quality of the process, closely related to how the
moments of truth of the service encounters themselves and are taken care of and how the
service provider functions. Illustrated in figure 1, there are the two basic quality
dimensions, namely, What the customer receives and How the customer receives it; the
technical result or outcome of the process (technical quality) and the functional
dimension of the process (functional quality. An organization‟s image is an important
variable that positively or negatively influences marketing activities. Image is considered
to have the ability to influence customers‟ perception of the goods and services offered
(Zeithaml and Bitner, 1996).Thus, image will have an impact on customers‟ buying
behaviour. Image is considered to influence customers‟ minds through the combined
effects of advertising, public relations, physical image, word-of-mouth, and their actual
experiences with the goods and services (Normann, 1991). Similarly, Grönroos (1983),
using numerous researches on service organizations, found that service quality was the
single most important determinant of image. Thus, a customer‟s experience with the
products and services is considered to be the most important factor that influences his
mind in regard to image.
14
For instance, if the service provider shares a positive or favorable image in the minds of
the customers, minor mistakes will probably be overlooked or forgiven. However, if the
image is negative, the impact of any mistake will often be considerably greater than it
otherwise would be. This entire combination shall lead to total quality.
Total
Quality
Image (Corporate/ Local)
Technical quality of Functional quality
the outcome: WHAT of the process:
HOW
Figure 1: Two service quality dimensions
(Gronroos, 2001)
15
2.3.2 The Perceived Service Quality approach
Gronroos (1982) introduced a service oriented approach to quality with the concept of
Perceived Service Quality and the model of Total Perceived Service Quality. This
approach is based on research into consumer behavior and the effects of expectations
concerning goods performance on post-consumption evaluations.
In previous sections, the two basic quality dimensions (the what and the how) in the
minds of the customers has been discussed. However, the quality perception process is
more complicated. It is not the experiences of the quality dimensions alone that determine
whether quality is perceived as good, neutral or bad. Figure 2 illustrates how quality
experiences are connected to traditional marketing activities resulting in a Perceived
Service Quality. Good perceived quality is obtained when the experienced quality meets
the expectations of the customers i.e. the expected quality. If expectations are unrealistic,
the total perceived quality will be low, irrespective of the experienced quality measured
in an objective way being good. As illustrated in figure 2, the expected quality is a
function of factors, namely, marketing communication, word of mouth, company/local
image, price, customer needs and values. Marketing communication includes advertising,
direct mail, sales promotion, websites, internet communication and sales campaigns.
These are directly under the control of the company unlike the image and word of mouth
factors which are indirectly controlled by the company. Image of the company plays a
central role in customer perception of service quality. Thus, it is imperative that image be
properly managed. External impact on these factors could possibly occur, but they are a
basically a function of the previous performance of the firm, supported by for instance
advertising. Lastly, the needs of the customers as well as the values that determine the
choice of customers also impact on their expectations. Thus, the level of total perceived
quality is not determined simply by the level of technical and functional quality
dimensions, but rather by the gap between the expected and experienced quality.
16
Image
Expected
quality Experienced
Total perceived quality quality
Image
Marketing
communication
Sales
Image Technical Functional
Word of mouth quality: quality:
Public relations WHAT HOW
Customer needs
and values
Figure 2: Total Perceived Quality
(Gronroos, 2001)
2.3.3 Gaps between customer expectations and perceptions:
There exists a gap between expected service quality and perceived service quality. In an
attempt to explain such gap, Parasuraman et al (1985), came up with a „gap model‟ which
is intended to be used for analyzing sources of quality problems and help managers
understand how service quality can be improved. The model is illustrated in figure 3.
17
Word of mouth Personal needs Past experience
communications
Customer
Expected service
Gap 5
Perceived service
Gap 4
Service delivery (including pre External communications to
Company and post contacts) consumers
Gap 1 Gap 3
Translation of perception into
service quality specifications
Gap 2
Management perceptions of
customer expectations
Figure 3: The Gaps Model (Source: Parasuraman et al, 1988)
Firstly, the model demonstrates how service emerges. The upper portion of the model
includes phenomena related to customers, while the lower portion includes phenomena
related to the service provider. The expected service is a function of the customer‟s past
experience and personal needs and of word of mouth communication. It is also influenced
by the market communication activities of the firm. The service experienced, which in
this model is termed as perceived service, is the outcome of a series of internal decisions
18
and activities. Management perceptions of customer expectations guide decisions
regarding service quality specifications to be followed by the company when service
delivery (i.e. the execution of the service express) occurs. The customer experiences the
service delivery and production process as a process-related quality component and the
technical solution received by the process as an outcome-related quality component. As
illustrated, marketing communication can influence the perceived service and also the
expected service. This basic model demonstrates the steps that have to be considered
during analyzing and planning service quality. The five discrepancies (so-called quality
gaps) between the various elements of the structure are a result of inconsistencies in the
quality management process. The ultimate gap (Gap 5) i.e. the gap between expected and
perceived (experienced) service is a function of other gaps that possibly occurred in the
process. The five gaps are discussed below:
1. The Management Perception Gap (Gap1): This gap occurs when the
management perceives the quality expectations inaccurately due to inaccurate
information from market research and demand analyses, inaccurately interpreted
information about expectations, nonexistent demand analysis, bad or nonexistent
upward information from the firm‟s interface with its customers to management
and numerous organizational layers which stop or change the information that
may flow upward from those directly involved in customer contacts. Necessary
action to open up or improve the various internal information channels has to be
taken in such situations.
2. The Quality Specification Gap ( Gap 2): This gap signifies that service quality
specifications are not consistent with management perceptions of quality
expectations due to planning errors or insufficient planning procedures, bad
management of planning, lack of clear goal-setting in the company and
insufficient support for planning service quality from top management. The
planning related problems vary depending on the size of the first gap. However,
even if there is sufficient accurate information on customer expectations, planning
of quality specifications may fail due to lack of real commitment to service
19
quality among top management. Commitment, dedication and devotion to service
quality among management as well as service providers are of highest importance
and priority in closing the Quality Specification Gap.
3. The Service Delivery Gap (Gap 3): This gap means that quality specifications
are not met by performance in the service production and delivery process due to
specifications which are too complicated and/or too rigid, employees not agreeing
with the specifications and therefore not fulfilling them, specifications not being
in line with the existing corporate culture, bad management of service operations,
lacking or insufficient internal marketing and technology and systems not
facilitating performance according to specifications. The possible problems here
are many and varied and usually the reasons for the existence of a Service
Delivery Gap are complicated and so are the cures. The reason for this gap can be
divided into three categories: management supervision, employee perception of
specifications and rules/customer needs and wishes, and a lack of
technological/operational support.
Management and supervision related problems may be varied too. For instance,
supervisors may not be encouraging and supportive of quality behavior or the
supervisory control systems may be in conflict with good service or even with
quality specifications. In an organization where control and reward systems are
decided upon separately from the planning of quality specifications, which is the
case often, there is inherent risk of a Service Delivery Gap occurring. Often non-
essential or important activities are controlled, perhaps even rewarded; and
activities that contradict quality specifications are encouraged by the control
system. Control and reward systems partly determine the corporate culture, and
goals and specifications that do not fit the prevailing culture tend not to be well
executed. The cure here involves changes in the way managers and supervisors
treat their subordinates and in the way supervisory systems control and reward
performance.
20
Since the way in which performance requirements of the specifications, on one
hand and existing control and reward systems on the other hand, are in conflict
with each other, an awkward situation may arise for personnel when a customer
contact person realizes that a customer requires different behavior on the part of
the service provider than that expected according to the company‟s specifications.
It must be noted that situations where the service provider is aware of the fact that
the customer is not receiving what he expects and may feel that the demands and
wishes of the customer are justified and perhaps could be fulfilled, however, the
service provider is not allowed to perform accordingly, may ruin the motivation
for quality-enhancing behavior among personnel. The skills and attitudes of
personnel may cause problems if the wrong people are recruited. For instance, the
firm may have employees who are unable to adjust to the specifications and
systems that guide operations. Furthermore, the workload perceived by employees
may be a problem. For example, there may be too much paperwork or some other
administrative tasks involved, so that quality specifications cannot be fulfilled and
a result of which, the service provider does not possess time to attend to
customers as expected.
Lastly, the technology or the systems of operating, including decision making
may not be suitable to employees. The problem may be the employees, but it is
quite probable that technology and operational and administrative systems have
been introduced inappropriately. Perhaps the technology and systems do not
support quality behavior, or they have been improperly introduced to the
employees. To close the Service Delivery Gap, the problems need to be dealt with
effectively and efficiently.
4. The Marketing Communication Gap (Gap 4): This gap occurs when promises
given by market communication activities are not consistent with the service
delivered due to market communication planning not being integrated with
service operations, lacking or insufficient coordination between traditional
external marketing and operations, the organization failing to perform according
21
to specifications, whereas market communication campaigns follow these
specifications and an inherent propensity to exaggerate, and, thus, promise
excessively. The reasons for Marketing Communication Gap can be divided into
two categories: the planning and executing of external market communication and
operations and a company‟s propensity to over-promise in all advertising and
marketing communication. The cure in the first situation could be creating a
system that coordinates planning and execution of external market
communication campaigns with service operations and delivery. For instance,
every major campaign could be planned in collaboration with those involved in
service production and delivery for Dual goal to be achieved. First, promises in
market communications become more accurate and realistic and second, a greater
commitment to what is promised in external campaigns could be achieved. The
second category of problems i.e. over-promising can be dealt with by improving
planning of marketing communication and/or closer management supervision.
5. The Perceived Service Quality Gap (Gap 5): This gap signifies that the
perceived or experienced service is not consistent with the expected service
resulting in negatively confirmed (bad) quality and a quality problem, bad word
of mouth, a negative impact on corporate or local image and lost business.
However, this gap may also be positive, which leads either to a positively
confirmed quality or over-quality. If a Perceived Service Quality Gap occurs, the
reason could be any one or a combination of those discussed above or other
additional reasons. Addressing these gaps could be a basis for developing service
processes in which expectations and experience consistently meet and a good
perceived service quality will enhance.
Some of the possible strategies that could be adopted by organizations to close these
quality gaps are tabulated in Table 1.
22
Gaps Possible strategies to close gaps
1 Change of management (in extreme situations), otherwise normally,
learn from front-line customer contact staff, flatten the hierarchical
structure, include expectations data in consumer records, market
research for improvement in the knowledge of the characteristics of
service competition, etc.
2 Change in firm‟s priorities, Commitment to develop service standards
wherever possible, feasibility assessment of customer expectations,
develop a standards documentation process, automation of processes
wherever possible and desirable, activities outsourced wherever
competencies are lacking, development of service quality goals, etc.
3 Investment in people: (recruitment, training and retention), investment
in technology, redesigning workflow, encourage self organized teams;
improve internal communication, clear job specifications to avoid
ambiguity, reward service excellence, etc.
4 Brief the advertising agency of the company, external communication
of what the customer can expect through advertising, training
employees not to over-promise, penalize employees who over-promise,
encourage customers to sample the service experience, excel at service
recovery, encourage and manage customer complaints, etc.
(Buttle, 2004; Gronroos, 2001 and Looy, Gemmel & Dierdonck, 2003)
23
2.3.4 Service Guarantee
An organization tries to balance its customers‟ expectations with the delivered service. A
service guarantee promises the customers a certain service quality and backs up such
promise with a payout, making services more „tangible‟, reducing the perceived risk of
purchasing a service.
“A service guarantee makes the customer a meaningful promise and specifies a payout
and an invocation procedure in case the promise is not kept. Each of these elements is
equally important in making a guarantee successful” (Looy, Gemmel & Dierdonck, 2003)
The key elements of this definition are discussed below:
The Promise
Through introduction of a service guarantee, an organization makes a credible promise to
its customers. For example, PTT Telecom promise to connect new telephones within
three working days and to fix telephone lines within a day and a half. This promise is a
credible one in a European context, where shorter lead times are highly desirous by
customers (Looy, Gemmel & Dierdonck, 2003). In defining a promise, a company
should be careful not to promise what would be expected anyway. This may negatively
signal that service failures are likely to be expected. Some promises are limited in scope
i.e. guarantee only less important service aspects or are highly conditional, excluding all
major causes of service failure. For example, Lufthansa guarantees that its customers will
make their connecting flights if there are no delays due to weather or air-traffic control
problems. Ironically, these two problems cause in total 95 percent of all flight delays.
Furthermore, the guarantee is applicable only if all flights including connecting flights
are with Lufthansa (Lufthansa airlines, 1987). The presence of a service guarantee can
support the perception of service reliability, which is one of the most critical determinants
of customer satisfaction. However, sometimes a guarantee may give out a negative
message, indicating that service failures may occur due to customers wondering why it is
necessary to provide a guarantee. For example, Lufthansa promises its customers that
24
their luggage will arrive with them. However, this created the perception that lost luggage
is more a problem with Lufthansa than its competitors (Lufthansa airlines, 1987). The
effectiveness of communicating a service guarantee also depends on the source of the
message, especially if the form has a history of service problems, making it difficult for a
service firm with bad service reputation to send out credible message.
The Payout
In a situation where promises are not kept, the customer shall receive a payout which will
encourage the customer to communicate all service failures, which has a double effect:
Service recovery: The customer who claims his payout is less likely to defect or
spread a negative word of mouth. Hence, service recovery becomes a possibility.
Service quality improvement: Each claim represents valuable information about
quality errors and their possible causes, but the avoidance of future payouts
functions as an incentive to all staff to participate in improvement projects.
In order to achieve service recovery, the payout has to be meaningful to customers. It
should not only make up for all the damage and inconvenience suffered but also make the
customer „whole.‟ For example, the payout offered by the Dutch bus service
organization, “Interliner,” makes their customer „whole‟ by guaranteeing that their
passengers will reach their connecting flights and buses. A refund would not adequately
compensate the passenger who missed a connection. Therefore, any passenger who
would have to wait for more than fifteen minutes for a connection due to delay by
Interliner would be taken to his destination by taxi at Interliner‟s expense
(www.interliner.nl). A payout can also be too high. For example, in India atleast,
Domino‟s Pizza offers customers its pizza free of charge if they were not delivered within
thirty minutes from ordering.
25
The Invocation Procedure
The final aspect of the service guarantee is the invocation procedure. Invocating a
guarantee should be either easy or proactive. For example, supermarkets Hoogvliet
(Netherlands) and Match (Belgium) promise short queues at their checkouts. If all tills
are not manned and if some customer is the third one (Hoogvliet) or the fourth one
(Match) in the queue, he does not have to pay (Hoogvliet) or receives a significant
discount (Match). An example of unconditional satisfaction guarantee which is easy to
invoke is that of Superquinn‟s Goof Card System. Superquinn is the leading
supermarketing chain in the Greater Dublin area. Periodically, customers who participate
in the loyalty saving system called „Superclub‟ receive a „Goof Card‟. Each time
Superquinn „goofs‟ i.e. produces a service failure, the customer simply has to point it out
to any member of staff, and he shall receive thirty bonus points worth £1. The guarantee
offers unconditional satisfaction guarantee as customers are able to define the goof
themselves, however, for further help to customers, Superquinn lists ten examples of
goofs. The invocation of PTT Telecom‟s guarantee for example is proactive as well.
After each connection or repair, PTT Telecom makes an after-sales call to the customer
trying to assess customer‟s satisfaction. If there is a failure of promise, the customer is
immediately informed of the payout (Looy, Gemmel & Dierdonck, 2003).
2.3.5 Service Recovery
The real test of the customer orientation of a service provider takes place when service
failure has occurred. Ideally, quality should be high throughout and failures should not
occur in the service processes. However, in reality employees makes mistakes, systems
break down, customers in the service process may cause problem for other customers,
etc. Service recovery is a strategy for managing mistakes, failures and problems in
customer relationships (Gronroos, 2001). As defined by Tax and Brown (2000) (in
gronroos 2001), “Service recovery is a process that identifies service failures, effectively
resolves customer problems, classifies their root cause(s), and yields data
26
that can be integrated with other measures of performance to assess and improve the
service system.” Service recovery includes all actions taken by company when there has
been a service failure. Services fail for different reasons- sometimes technical service
fails; sometimes functional service quality (Keaveney, 1995 in Buttle, 2004). Problems
caused by a service failure are two-fold; factual and emotional problems (Gronroos,
2001). In a problematic situation when service recovery is called upon, customers are
often frustrated, possess high expectations and tend to have a narrower zone of tolerance
that normal (Tax et all, 1998). Therefore, service recovery could be risky (Smith and
Bolton, 1998) and needs to be well managed. Service recovery performance can be better
if the employees are more committed to the visions, strategies and service concepts of the
firm. Moreover, empowered employees can be expected to perform better in recovery
situations, inclined to deal quickly and effectively with service failures (Boshoff and
Allen, 2000). When companies resolve problems quickly and effectively there are
positive consequences for customer satisfaction, customer retention and word-of-mouth
(Tax et al, 1998). Service recovery process should be developed and exercised to
maximize fairness as perceived by the customer (Ruyter and Wetzels, 2000). In addition
to mistake correction, quick response and adequate compensation are considered crucial
elements of service recovery (Johnston and Fern, 1999). It has been discovered that
customers who have been let down, then well recovered, are more satisfied than
customers who have not been let down all (Hart et al, 1990). A well managed recovery
has positive impact in development of a trusting relationship between a firm and its
customer and may also deepen the customer‟s commitment towards the service provider
(Tax et al, 1998). Service recovery is an important factor influencing perceived service
quality and is a criterion which can have a positive effect on functional quality.
Satisfaction with the service can be increased through good service recovery (Spreng,
Harrell & Mackoy, 1995). According to Patrick Mene, Director of Quality at the Ritz-
Carlton Hotel Company “1-10-100 rule of service recovery”, what costs the firm one
pound, euro or dollar to fix immediately will cost ten the next day and hundred later on
(Patlow, 1993). An example of quick service recovery is an incident that took place at the
Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Phoenix, Arizona. A group of four MBA students from Europe had
attended a seminar at the hotel and wished to spend a few hours of leisure time at the
27
swimming pool before leaving for the airport. When they arrived at the swimming pool
around mid afternoon, they were politely told that the pool area was closing because the
area was to be prepared for an evening reception and dinner. The students explained that
during their stay at the hotel, that was the only time they could spend at the pool before
returning to the freezing temperature of their country and they had been looking forward
to this opportunity. The waiter requested them to wait while he sorted out the situation.
After a short while, a supervisor arrived to inform them that the hotel unfortunately had
to close the entire pool area for evening preparation. However, he added that a limousine
was waiting for them outside the main entrance to take them and their luggage to
Biltmore Hotel where the pool area would be at their disposal. This limousine was at the
Ritz-Carlton‟s expense undoubtedly. This delighted the group and their already favorable
perception of the hotel was improved further. They also engaged in considerable amount
of positive word-of-mouth communication (Gronroos, 2001).
2.3.6 Complaints management
Customers complain under one or both of the conditions: their expectations being
underperformed to a degree that falls outside their zone of tolerance or unfair treatment.
Complaints management process should be developed to take a positive view of customer
complaints. Customers who complain provide an opportunity for the service firm to
identify root causes of problems as well as win back unhappy or dissatisfied customers to
retain their future value (Buttle, 2005). A complaints management process should allow
company to capture complaints before customers spread a negative word-of-mouth or
take their business elsewhere (Buttle, 1998). Up to two-thirds of customers who are
dissatisfied do not complain to the organization (Richins, 1983). However, they may
complain to their social networks. Dissatisfied customers are likely to inform twice as
many people about their experience than customers with a positive experience (TARP,
1995 in Buttle, 2005). According to Wilson (1991), only 4 percent of the dissatisfied
customers actually complain, providing valuable feedback to the company. The
remaining 96 percent choose to simply leave the business and go elsewhere. Companies
choose to deal with complaints efficiently to bring about customer retention, continuous
28
improvement in service quality and build a customer- focused organization (Looy,
Gemmel & Dierdonck, 2003).
The customers choose not to complain for some reasons listed in table 2 below.
They do not know how to register a They believe complaining will be useless
complaint because the company don‟t care about them or
their complaints
They believe it is not worth the time They fear retribution. For example, many
or trouble people are reluctant to complain about the
police.
(Wilson, 1991 and Buttle, 2005)
Now, we shall move into the section of the literature review where we shall highlight the
privacy issue with CRM.
2.4 Do all customers want a relationship with their service provider?
It is clear that companies want relationships with customers, but it is far less clear that
customers universally want relationships with their suppliers. In a business to customer
context, relationships may be sought when the customer seeks benefits over and above
those directly derived from acquiring, consuming or using the service. The benefits
include recognition, personalization, power, risk reduction, status and affiliation (Buttle,
2004). Examples of each such benefit are mentioned below
Recognition: A customer may feel more valued and important when recognized
and addressed by name
29
Personalization: For example, over time, a hotel manager may understand a
customer‟s particular preferences or expectations
Power: For instance, some of the power asymmetries in relationships between
banks and their customers may be reversed when customers feel that they have
personal relationships with their bank officers and managers.
Risk reduction: Risk may be in the form of performance, physical, financial,
social or psychological. High levels of perceived risk are uncomfortable for many
customers. A relationship has the ability to reduce, or even eliminate risk. For
example, a customer may develop a relationship with a garage to reduce the
perceived performance and physical risk attached to having a car serviced. The
relationship provides the assurance that the job has been skillfully accomplished
and the car is safe to drive.
Status: For example, customers may feel that their status is enhanced by a
relationship with an organization, say, the Hilton.
Affiliation: people‟s social needs can be met through relationships. For example,
many people join particular forums or associations to be a part of a community.
However, there are some customers who would be satisfied with the service quality and
perhaps decide to be loyal, but not want a relationship as such with the supplier for
privacy issues. It is a known fact that suppliers wish to increase their sales to customers.
In order to know and analyze their customers, companies collect extensive data on their
customers through various channels. One popular rather common channel is through
loyalty programs and cards. Examples include Tesco loyalty cards, Hilton hhonors
program, British Airways frequent flyer cards, etc. The companies provide some benefits
to customers and collect data like contact name, history of purchase, money spent in the
30
past on company‟s services, etc. However, if the data is mishandled or incorrectly
handled, it can destroy the trust and loyalty in the relationship. (Vargas, 2006)
Privacy and data protection are key concerns of customers, who are increasingly
concerned about the amount of information that organizations have about them and the
uses to which information is put. In reality, most customers are unaware of the quantity
of information available to companies. Some customers may wish to simply not join any
loyalty programs in order to secure their privacy and prevent intrusion into personal
information.
2.5 Synopsis
This section has provided available literature about CRM. The gap model explained shall
be a strong basis for explaining the dark side of CRM. Privacy issues shall be given
importance as well. The customers‟ perception of service quality is to be given supreme
priority by the hotel industry. It is important how customers perceive the service quality
to be. What they receive and how they receive corresponding to their expectations helps
them judge the service quality to a large extent.
31
Chapter 3: CRM and Hotel Industry
The hotel industry today has been recognized as a global industry, with producers and
consumers spread around the world. The use of hotel facilities such as: room, restaurant,
bar, nightclub or health club; are no longer considered a luxury. For many people these
services have become an integral component of lifestyle. Moreover, in the last two
decades, demand for and supply of hospitality services beyond that of the traditional
services intended for travelers have escalated the growth of the hospitality industry
globally, leading to intense competition in the market-place. One of the greatest
challenges facing hotel organizations today is the ever-growing volume and pace of
competition. Competition has had major implications for the customer, providing
increased choice, greater value for money and augmented levels of service.
Additionally, there is little to distinguish one hotel‟s products and services from another.
Thus it has become imperative for hotel organizations to gain a competitive advantage.
There are two strategies most commonly used by hotel managers in order to gain a
competitive advantage, which are low-cost leadership through price discounting and
developing customer loyalty by providing unique benefits to customers. Hotels that
attempt to improve their market share by discounting price run the serious risk of having
a negative impact on the hotel‟s medium- and long-term profitability. As a result, it is
quality of service rather than price that has become the key to a hotel‟s ability to
differentiate itself from its competitors and to gain customer loyalty. Getty and
Thompson (1994) studied relationships between quality of lodging, satisfaction, and the
resulting effect on customers‟ intentions to recommend the lodging to prospective
customers. Their findings suggest that customers‟ intentions to recommend are a function
of their perception of both their satisfaction and service quality with the lodging
experience. However, satisfying customers alone is not enough, since there is no
guarantee that satisfied customers will return to purchase. It is now becoming apparent
that customer loyalty is significantly more important than customer satisfaction for
success.
32
Numerous examples illustrate that it is important that the hotel industry develop customer
loyalty, as opposed to relying solely on pricing strategies. Researchers have shown that a
5 per cent increase in customer loyalty can produce a profit increase of 25 per cent to 85
per cent (Reichheld and Sasser, 1990). Hence a dedicated focus on customer loyalty is
likely to become a necessary prerequisite for the future survival of hotel organizations.
In the hotel industry, Customer relationship management (CRM) is more than the
practice of collecting guest-centric data. It‟s the art of using historical, personal, and
experiential information to personalize a guest‟s stay while generating incremental
revenue opportunities. For instance, knowing a traveler is an avid sports fan creates the
opportunity to market tickets to a game; knowing a guest had a less-than-memorable
experience in the hotel restaurant gives you a chance to win them back the next time they
are in town. With the latest offerings in CRM, hoteliers can develop comprehensive guest
profiles from reservation information and demonstrate to guests that the property is in
touch with their needs, drive guest-centric data down to the transaction level, allowing
employees and guest-facing technology to deliver greater value to the guest, generate a
realistic profile on the spending and stay patterns of guests, allowing the property to
create guest-centric marketing for increased loyalty and spending, etc.(Microsoft, 2006).
To summarize, the shift in the sales and marketing landscape requires the hotel
companies to be as advanced as technology will allow in managing their customer
relationships. “There will be a sea change from management of customer data to
management of customer relationships”. “Hotel companies must carefully consider how
they store, track, analyze and act upon every aspect of their relationships with their guests
and booking customers.” The emphasis should be on using the data intelligently to
predict consumer behavior, such as loyalty and usage patterns, and to use the customer
knowledge to anticipate the customer needs or problems (EURHOTEC, 2000).
33
Chapter 4: Methodology and Research Design
4.1 Overview
Methodology can be defined as (i) “a body of methods, rules, and postulates employed by
a discipline”, (ii) “a particular procedure or set of procedures or (iii) “the analysis of the
principles or procedures of inquiry in a particular field”, the common idea being the
collection, the comparative study, and the critique of the individual methods that are used
in a given discipline or field of inquiry (Wikipedia, 2006).
This chapter of the paper provides an overview of the research design (i.e. the case study)
used for research about the hotel industry. The objectives of the research have been
mentioned followed by a definition of research design and the qualitative approach of the
case study. The researcher then presents his justification for choosing Ritz-Carlton Hotel
Company as his case example leading to methods of data collection for the research
conducted along with each method‟s strengths and weaknesses. This chapter concludes
with discussion on data analysis and the reliability and validity issues with data collection
4.2 Research objectives
A review of the present literature is a stepping stone in compiling the objectives behind
the research. In this regard, the literature review enabled an understanding of how can the
hotel industry improve its business performance through service quality, customer
satisfaction and customer loyalty. The service quality is provided by hotels to ultimately
satisfy the customers and the hotel managers must know what their customer wants rather
than blindly assuming. Even though the service quality may be satisfactory, there may be
a gap between the expected service quality by the customer and their experienced service
quality. The hotel management has to strive to bridge these gaps to improve service
quality and customer satisfaction and attempt to bring about customer loyalty which in
turn would impact business performance. The literature review also highlighted that there
is possibly a „dark side of CRM‟ which refers to privacy issues of the customer and
34
doubts about customers willing to build relationships in the long run. There is also not
ample literature available on the customer‟s perspective i.e. how the customer feels about
what the hotel provides him with, if the hotel actually provides them with what they
promise to deliver, if the customers value all they receive and how much, the privacy
issues and possibly customers‟ reaction to certain experiences during their stay, just to
name a few not so explored sides of CRM. Inspired by the above, the research objectives
are as follows:
1. Does the gap model explain the dark side of CRM?
2. Is there more to the dark side of CRM than what is explained in the gap model?
3. How can the dark side of CRM be reduced?
4.3 Research design
A research design can be explained as the “detailed blueprint used to guide a research
study toward its objectives” (Aaker, Kumar and Day, 2003). Research design provides
the “glue that holds the research project together. A design is used to structure the
research, to show how all of the major parts of the research project -- the samples or
groups, measures, treatments or programs, and methods of assignment -- work together to
try to address the central research questions” (Social research methods, 2006)
The process of designing a research study requires some interrelated decisions to be
made. The most significant decision is the choice of research approach which determines
how the information will be obtained. The choice of research approach is dependant on
the nature of the research to be conducted. Research approaches can be categorized into
one of the three general categories of research i.e. exploratory, descriptive and casual
(Aaker, Kumar and Day, 2003).
Exploratory research: This type of research is undertaken when one is seeking insight
into the general nature of a problem area, the possible decision alternatives and relevant
35
variable that are to be considered. The research methods are loosely defined, highly
flexible, unstructured and qualitative. The researcher begins without firm preconceptions
as to what will be the outcome. The absence of structure allows a thorough pursuit of
ideas and clues about the problem situation. Such research is conducted because a
problem has not been clearly defined. Exploratory research helps determine the best
research design, data collection method and selection of subjects. Such research often
relies on secondary research such as review of available literature and/or data, qualitative
approaches like informal discussions with customers, employees, management or
competitors, and more formal approaches like in-depth interviews, focus groups,
projective methods, case studies or pilot studies. The outcome of this type of research can
provide significant insight into a given situation and provide some explanation as to
“why”, “how” and “when” something occurs. However, exploratory research may not be
typically generalizable to population at large (Aaker, Kumar and Day, 2003 and
Wikipedia, 2006)
Descriptive research embraces a large proportion of marketing research, the objective
being to provide an accurate snapshot of some aspect of the marketing environment.
Casual research approach is used when it is essential to show that one variable causes or
determines the values of other variables. In such case, descriptive research is insufficient
as it can only show that two variables are related or associated (Aaker, Kumar and Day,
2003). There are various research methods that can be adopted which include case
studies, experiments, surveys, histories and archival information.
4.4 Case study: An introduction
Case study is an ideal methodology in a situation where a holistic, in-depth investigation
is needed (Feagin, Orum, & Sjoberg, 1991). A case study is a particular method of
qualitative research. Instead of using large samples and following a rigid protocol to
examine a limited number of variables, case study method involves an in-depth
longitudinal examination of a single instance or event: a case. It provides systematic
approach of looking at events, data collection, data analysis and reporting the results.
36
Resultantly, the researcher may gain a sharpened understanding of why the instance
occurred and what might be important to look at extensively in future research
(Wikipedia, 2006). Case studies lend themselves to generating and testing hypotheses
(Flyvbjerg, 2006)
Yin (2002) suggests that case study should be defined as a research strategy, an empirical
inquiry that investigates a phenomenon within its real-life context. Case study research
means single- and multiple case studies, may include quantitative evidence, relies on
multiple sources of evidence and benefits from prior development of theoretical
propositions. He notes that case studies should not be confused with qualitative research
and points out that they can be based on any mix of quantitative and qualitative evidence.
Case studies tend to be selective, focusing on one or two issues that are fundamental to
understanding the system being examined.
4.5 History of case study
The use of the case study originated only in the early 20th century as a distinct approach
to research. The Oxford English Dictionary traces the phrase „case study‟ or „case-study‟
back as far as 1934, after the establishment of the concept of „case history‟ in medicine.
The use of case studies for creation of new theory in social sciences was further
developed by sociologists Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss who presented their
research method, „Grounded theory‟ in 1967. The popularity of case studies as a research
tool developed in recent decades. One area in which case studies have been gaining
popularity is education and in particular educational evaluation. If used in (non-business)
education and professional development, case studies are often referred to as „critical
incidents‟ (Wikipedia, 2006).
4.6 Types of Case Study
Yin (1993) identified three specific types of case studies: Exploratory, Explanatory, and
Descriptive. Exploratory cases may be considered as a prelude to social research.
37
Explanatory case studies may be used for conducting causal investigations. Descriptive
cases require a descriptive theory to be developed before starting the project. Stake
(1995) included three other types: Intrinsic i.e. when the researcher has an interest in the
case; Instrumental i.e. when the case is used to understand further than what is obvious to
the observer and Collective which is when a group of cases are studied. Each of the above
types of case studies can be single-case or multiple-case applications.
4.7 Choice of case: Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company
Ritz-Carlton was chosen as a case example, mainly because the researcher was aware of
the high brand reputation of the hotel chain in the hotel industry worldwide. Instead of
choosing a leading hotel group from a particular country or region, the researcher decided
to pick a globally renowned hotel chain for addressing the global issue of service quality.
Hotel industry being a classic example of service companies attracted the researcher to
conduct a research on service quality in the luxurious hospitality sector. The researcher is
awestruck by the glamorous hotel properties and wondered if they provide an extremely
high level of service quality to the customers or simply provide facilities without
concentrated service. This led the researcher to investigate if what is promised by the
hotel and expected by the customer in terms of service quality is actually fulfilled, and if
so, to what extent.
4.8 Components of the Case Study
Yin (1994) proposed five components of case studies: (1) a study‟s questions, (2) its
propositions (if any), (3) its unit(s) of analysis, (4) the logic linking the data to the
propositions, and (5) the criteria for interpreting the findings (Yin, 1994, p. 20). The
proposition of this research work is (a) to investigate if the service quality received by the
customer meets the expectations of the customers and the promises made by the hotel and
(b) to bring to light the dark side of CRM in this industry (if any). The unit of analysis is
the organization i.e. Ritz-Carlton. In this case study, the customers‟ perception of service
38
quality is observed highlighting what the customers want and expect from the hotel. To
link the data to the propositions, „pattern matching‟ is adopted where various pieces of
information from the case is related to theoretical propositions.
For this project, the single case study approach was chosen by the researcher and
qualitative methods of data collection were adopted. The reason for opting qualitative
methods was to allow the researcher to conduct in-depth interviews which would prove
as an opportunity to receive information on what is it that customers actually want and
expect from the hotel and narrate incidents or instances where the service quality left an
impression on their mind, positive or negative. Quantitative approach would be more
suitable and appropriate had the researcher desired to measure customer satisfaction or
loyalty. The researcher aims to research on service quality and the possible dark side to
CRM which is definitely linked to customer satisfaction and loyalty, however, his aim for
this project is not to measure customer satisfaction. Focus groups and direct observations
were also appropriate ways to research which would be classified under qualitative
methods.
4.9 Data collection
In case studies, data collection is treated as a design issue that shall enhance the construct
and internal validity of the study as well as the external validity and reliability. Yin
(1994) identified six primary sources of evidence for case study research which are
documentation, archival records, interviews, direct observation, participant observation
and physical artifacts. It is to be noted that not all sources are essentially required in
every case study; however, the importance of multiple sources of data to the reliability of
the study is well established. No single source has an absolute advantage over the others;
rather, they might be complementary and could be used in tandem. Thus, a case study
should use as many sources as are relevant to the study. Table 3 indicates the strengths
and weaknesses of each type.
39
SOURCE OF STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
EVIDENCE
Documentation stable : repeated review retrievability: difficult
unobtrusive : exist prior to biased selectivity
case study reporting bias : reflects
exact: names etc. author bias
broad coverage: extended access : may be blocked
time span
Archival Same as above Same as above
precise and quantitative privacy might inhibit access
Records
Interviews targeted - focuses on case bias due to poor questions
study topic response bias
insightful - provides incomplete recollection
perceived causal inferences reflexivity - interviewee
expresses what interviewer
wants to hear
Direct reality - covers events in real time-consuming
time selectivity - might miss facts
Observation
contextual - covers event reflexivity - observer's
context presence might cause change
cost - observers need time
Participant Same as above Same as above
insightful into interpersonal bias due to investigator's
Observation
behaviour actions
Physical insightful into cultural selectivity
features availability
Artifacts
insightful into technical
operations
Table 3: Types of evidence, their strengths and weaknesses
Source: Yin (1994, p. 80)
40
In this project, data collection has been both primary and secondary. Initially, secondary
data was collected through the medium of existing articles, journals and books on the
available research relating to CRM in general, service quality, customer satisfaction and
customer loyalty. The data was filtered and sorted and relevant portions pertaining to the
hotel industry were focussed on by the researcher. The advantage of collecting secondary
data was it was monetarily cheap and easily accessible. The secondary data collected was
helpful in addressing the research questions in combination with the primary data
collected. Primary data was collected by the researcher through in-depth interviews
conducted and focus group discussions on what the customers really want and expect,
what is the dark side to CRM and how can it be reduced.
4.9.1 Documentation
In a generalized way, “documentation is any communicable material such as text, video,
audio, etc, used to explain some attributes of an object, system or procedure” (Wikipedia,
2006). Documents include letters, memoranda, agendas, study reports, or any items that
could add to the data base. The validity of the documents should be carefully reviewed in
order to avoid incorrect data being included in the data base (Yin, 1994).
The documentation for this research includes data in the form of articles and journals
providing information on CRM, website information on the case i.e. Ritz-Carlton,
journals and articles on the hotel industry, about the hotel and its service quality and
customer satisfaction surveys conducted.
4.9.2 Focus Groups
Focus groups are a form of qualitative research whereby a group of people are questioned
about their attitude towards a product, service, concept, advertisement, idea, or
packaging. The questions are asked in an interactive group setting where participants are
free to discuss their opinions, thoughts and views with other group members (Wikipedia,
2006). Focus groups are under-used in social research, although they have a long history
41
in market research (Morgan 1988), and more recently in medical research (Powell &
Single 1996). There are several definitions of a focus group in the literature, but features
like “organized discussion” (Kitzinger 1994), “collective activity” (Powell et al 1996),
“social events” (Goss & Leinbach 1996) and “interaction” (Kitzinger 1995) identify the
contribution that focus groups make to social research. Focus groups can be used at some
of the following instances.
1. Preliminary or exploratory stages of the study (Kreuger 1988);
2. During a study, to evaluate or develop a particular programme of activities (Race
et al 1994); or after a programme has been completed, to assess its impact or to
generate further avenues of research.
3. Either as a method in their own right or as a complement to other methods,
especially for triangulation (Morgan 1988) and validity checking.
In the present study, the researcher moderated focus groups to understand what do
customers really want and expect from a luxury hotel, if there is a service failure of any
sort due to expectations being under-met or the company not providing what they
promised, what is the service recovery the customer expects, gain some interesting
information and knowledge about their previous experiences with luxury hotels and also
identify the possible dark side to CRM in context to Ritz-Carlton and luxury hotel
industry at large. Focus groups help to explore or generate hypotheses (Powell & Single
1996). The researcher gained different perspectives about customer wants and
expectations which helped him analyze the case deeply.
The recommended strength per group is usually six to ten (MacIntosh 1993), however,
some researchers used upto fifteen people (Goss & Leinbach 1996) or as few as four
(Kitzinger 1995). Numbers of groups vary, some studies conducting only one meeting
with each of several focus groups (Burgess 1996), others meeting the same group several
times. Focus group sessions usually last from one to two hours. The researcher for his
study met the two focus groups just once with an average strength per group of five. The
average duration of focus groups was one and half hours, wherein the members were
42
deeply engrossed in their discussion and the researcher gained useful information from
the deep-rooted, passionate and heart-to-heart discussion.
The main topics of discussion at the focus groups were as follows.
What the customer wants and expects from a luxury hotel?
What is the dark side to CRM in the luxury segment hotel industry? Is it only the
gaps in service quality or there is more to the dark side?
In case of service failure, what is the expected service recovery from the
customers‟ point of view?
Does Ritz-Carlton live up to the customer expectations?
If you were a customer of Ritz-Carlton, what would your expectations be?
What recommendations would you give to possibly reduce the dark side of CRM
for hotel industry at large?
4.9.3 Interviews
An interview is a conversation between two or more people i.e. the interviewer and the
interviewee, where interviewees are questioned by the interviewer to obtain information.
Interviews can be divided into two rough types, interviews of assessment and interviews
for information. Interviews can also be divided into three forms- structured, semi-
structured and non structured (Wikipedia, 2006) The researcher chose to conduct semi
structured interviews after weighing the advantages and disadvantages of the method
(tabulated in Table 4). This method suited the research most appropriately and the
researcher was able to collect data on the case through in-depth semi structured
interviews consisting of few open ended questions which allowed a two-way
communication between the interviewer and interviewee and the interviewee gave
unbiased opinions which proved to be a useful pool of resources for the researcher to
analyze the situation and provided him with deeper understanding of the subject and
enabled accurate comprehension.
The semi structured interview is a frequently used qualitative method. In its Piagetian
version, the clinical-critical method, has been well described and discussed (Castorina et
43
al. 1989; Honey 1987; Piaget 1926, 1947; Turiel 1983; Vinh-Bang 1966). The semi
structured interview can be defined as a “method of data collection which involves an
interaction between an interviewer and interviewee for which the purpose is to obtain
valid and reliable information” (Neitzschman & Neitzschman, 2002). In brief, it is a
conversation with a purpose (Kahn and Cannell, 1957).
In-depth interview is an open-ended, discovery-oriented method that is well suited for
describing both program processes and outcomes from the perspective of the target
audience or key stakeholder. The goal of the interview is to deeply explore the
respondent‟s point of view, feelings and perspectives. In this sense, in-depth interviews
yield information. Some of the key characteristics that differentiate an in-depth,
qualitative research interview from a regular interview include:
Open-ended Questions: Questions should be worded so that respondents cannot simply
answer yes or no, but must expound on the topic. For example, the question should be
“what makes you as a customer feel that you are satisfied with your stay at the hotel?”
rather than asking “do you as a customer, feel satisfied?”
Semi-structured Format: Although there should be some pre-planned questions to ask
during the interview, the researcher must also allow questions to flow naturally, based on
information provided by the respondent. The researcher should not insist upon asking
specific questions in a specific order. In fact, the flow of the conversation dictates the
questions asked and those omitted, as well as the order of the questions.
Seek understanding and interpretation: The interviewer should try to interpret what
he/she is hearing, as well as seek clarity and a deeper understanding from the respondent
throughout the interview.
Conversational: The interviewer should be conversational, even though his/her role is
primarily of a listener. There should be smooth transitions from one topic to the next.
Recording responses: The responses should be recorded, typically with audiotape and
written notes (i.e. field notes).
44
Record observations: The interviewer should observe and record non-verbal behaviors
on the field notes as they occur.
Record reflections: The interviewer should record his/her views and feelings
immediately after the interview as well.
In essence, in-depth interviews involve not only questioning, but the systematic recording
and documenting of responses coupled with intense probing for deeper meaning and
understanding of the responses. Thus, in-depth interviewing often requires repeated
interview sessions with the target audience under study. Unlike focus group interviews,
in-depth interviews occur with one individual at a time to provide a more involving
experience.
45
Advantages Disadvantages
The semi structured interview is the It is a time consuming method,
most adequate tool to capture how a requiring not only more time to collect
person perceives a particular domain. the data but also to analyze them.
Its combination of faith in what the
subject says with the scepticism about
what she/he is saying, about the
underlying meaning, induces the
interviewer to continue questioning the Some training is essential in order to
subject in order to confirm the avoid two different possible effects in
hypothesis about his/her beliefs the interview:
(Honey 1987).
a) the suggestion of answers or
b) not asking enough due to a certain
fear to bore the interviewee.
Allows deepening, discriminating, and
clarifying customer‟s conceptions on
any general subject and on
maltreatment in particular.
While the original script of the
interview guarantees uniformity of
topics across the whole sample, each
interview is different due to the new
questions elicited by the particular
answers given by the interviewee.
The semi structured interview can
incorporate different material:
dilemmas, practical situations to be
solved, stories, object manipulation,
etc, as a basis to ask on a particular
topic.
The use of semi structured interviews
serves also to test other types of
material.
Table 4: Advantages and Disadvantages of Semi structured interviews
(Creswell, 1997; Denzin & Lincoln, 1998 and Silverman, 2000)
46
The Process
The foremost task to be accomplished by the researcher was to find interviewees. The
researcher was successful in finding some interviewees from different countries and
culture. The researcher interviewed travelers staying at luxury hotels and gained
important knowledge about the research subject. The researcher also managed to
interview some staff members of the luxury hotels to gain a diversified perspective to his
research and add another dimension to his work. The in-depth interviews conducted
brought out some unique customer responses which further helped in deeply analyzing
the subject. The interviewees were requested to sign a consent form stating that they were
willingly being interviewed (Appendix 1). The interview began with an attempt to
minimize the hierarchical situation so that the subject feels comfortable talking with the
interviewer. An interview script was used, consisting of a set of questions guiding the
interaction. Nevertheless, as the aim was to capture as much as possible the subject‟s
thinking about the topic, the interviewer followed in depth the process of posing new
questions after the first answers was given. The interview lasted averagely for forty five
minutes to one hour. The researcher bought the interviewees (travelers) a drink each and
some snacks for volunteering to be interviewed. The outcome of the interview was a
mixed bag of responses and views on the topic which allowed the researcher to analyze
the research subject with a diversified perspective. The interviewers felt free to interact
with the interview and gave some frank and honest views. The researcher was successful
in encouraging most of the interviewees to engross themselves deeply into the
conversation. There were some respondents who were not convinced enough to
participate whole heartedly, however, some valuable information was collected through
their half hearted participation as well. The details of interviews conducted are tabulated
in Table 5.
The main questions asked to interviewees (customers) that helped in addressing the
research questions are as follows.
What would you as a customer expect from your stay at Ritz-Carlton? To what
extent Does Ritz-Carlton meet your expectations?
47
Is there a dark side to CRM at the Ritz-Carlton? Does Ritz-Carlton have any gaps
in service quality?
Are there any other negative aspects of the service delivered at Ritz-Carlton?
In case of service delivery not meeting your expectations, what is the service
recovery you desire?
What recommendations would you give to possibly reduce the dark side of CRM
at Ritz-Carlton and for hotel industry at large?
Anything else, you would like to share about Ritz-Carlton?
The main questions asked to the employees of Ritz-Carlton when interviewed were as
follows.
Why do you work at Ritz-Carlton? Are u happy working with this hotel?
Do gaps in service quality exist at Ritz-Carlton? How are they dealt with?
Is there anything you would like to mention as a negative aspect at Ritz-
Carlton?
Do customers appreciate the efforts made by the hotel to ensure superior
service quality?
Anything else that you would like to share?
48
Location Travelers interviewed Staff interviewed
Ritz-Carlton, Dubai 4 1
Burj Al Arab, Dubai 2 Nil
Ritz, London 3 1
Various Hilton properties in 5 Nil
London
Ritz, Paris 2 Nil
Le Meridean, Paris 1 Nil
Hotel Arts, Barcelona (Ritz- 4 1
Carlton property)
Hilton, Barcelona 2 Nil
Table 5: Details of interviews conducted across four popular holiday destinations
The analysis section shall provide deep insight into the findings through the methodology
adopted by the researcher. The limitations of the methodology and the difficulties faced
by the researcher shall be discussed towards the end of this paper.
4.10 Data Analysis
Data analysis consists of “examining, categorizing, tabulating, or otherwise recombining
the evidence to address the initial propositions of a study” (Yin, 1994). The researcher
relied on experience and the literature to present the analysis using various
interpretations. The methodology adopted i.e. direct observations, documentation, focus
groups and in-depth interviews helped the researcher to achieve the research objectives
and propositions and helped structure the analysis and provide some dark side to CRM
in the luxury hotel segment. The research conducted also put the researcher in a position
to voice recommendations to the managers of the luxury hotels discussed in later portions
of the paper. The data was analyzed in depth to interpret the customers‟ perspective
regarding the service quality and their responses to the dark side.
49
4.11 Key issues of Data collection: Reliability, Validity and Limitations
In the general sense, reliability is the “consistency” or “repeatability” of the research
measures (social research methods, 2006). Reliability and validity, in research, refer
specifically to the measurement of data as they will be used to answer the research
question. In most cases, the instrument that measures your variables is the central issue
in determining the reliability and validity of the data; however the data analysis process
often is also an issue if the data unstructured. Whatever data collection method is used,
the intent must be accuracy. The reliability of data collection refers to its consistency,
stability, and repeatability-all of which determine how much you can rely on the results
(Nettom, 2006).
The potential for over-reliance on document as evidence in case studies has been
criticized. There could be a danger of this occurrence if the researcher is inexperienced
and mistakes some types of documents for unmitigated truth (Yin, 1994). The reliability
of direct observation is a main concern. Using multiple observers is one way to guard
against this problem. The researcher ensured that he was unbiased in all direct
observations, interview interpretations and focus group outcome analysis, providing
information as he collected without any personal changes or biased analysis. The
researcher provides assurance that the data collection and analysis was done in a manner
that would be reliable and valid for future references. Qualitative research has been
criticized on grounds of reliability and validity; however, it was the most appropriate
approach for the research and was carried out religiously and sincerely.
This study was subject to certain limitations that shall be discussed in this section. Some
of the major limitations are as follows.
The researcher did not have sufficient time to conduct a further detailed research on the
dark side of CRM in the hotel industry. The method used for primary data collection was
focus groups and in-depth interviews and due to time constraints, only two focus groups
and a few interviews could be conducted.
50
There was not sufficient time and word availability to have multiple case studies for the
research. In addition, conducting a further detailed study requires highly expensive data
collection and thus, this was beyond the author‟s financial reach.
Since qualitative research is characterized by subjectivity, interviewees and focus group
members might have been biased in their responses. However, the author was sensitive to
this issue and adopted all the possible measures to counteract this aspect.
The following section leads the reader into the case study and analysis which shall
provide the reader with valuable knowledge on the customers‟ perception of service
quality and what they view as the dark side to CRM.
4.12 Synopsis
This section covered the literature on research methods and design and explained the
approach adopted by the researcher for data collection. Primary and secondary data was
collected over a period of two months and the findings have been analyzed and
interpreted in the following section. The reliability and validity issue was kept in mind.
The following section leads the reader into the case study and analysis which shall
provide the reader with valuable knowledge on the customers‟ perception of service
quality and what they view as the dark side to CRM and how the dark side can be
reduced. The limitations of the data collection have been mentioned briefly.
51
Chapter 5: Case study
Now, the researcher shall introduce the service provider Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company,
L.L.C. and provide a brief background of the hotel chain before discussing the service
quality at Ritz-Carlton and highlighting some dark sides which have been discovered
mainly through customer reactions during interviews, focus group discussions and direct
observations.
5.1 Ritz-Carlton: An Overview
Background: The story of luxury hotel chain „Ritz-Carlton‟ begins with César Ritz
(picture given below), well known in the hotel industry as “the king of hoteliers and
hotelier to kings” and who believed that the “customer is king”, similar to the Indian
belief “Atithi devo bhavah”(Appendix 2). His name
was associated with the most renowned hotels of his day,
including the Grand Hotel in Monte Carlo, the Savoy in
London, and then as manager of The Ritz in Paris,
starting in 1898, and The Carlton in London, opened in
1906. Paris and London hotel names combined
ultimately for the Ritz-Carlton combination we know.
Cesar Ritz established the benchmark for luxury hotels in
Europe, forming the framework
for the Ritz-Carlton service
philosophy, with comments
like: “Never say no when a client asks for something, even if it
is for the moon. You can always try.” As for the instantly
recognizable logo (picture given alongside), Cesar Ritz selected
the crown, symbolic of the British royal seal, and the lion,
signifying a financial backer. Despite his death in 1918, his wife Marie continued the
tradition of opening hotels in his name.
52
The original Ritz-Carlton hotel was built in Boston, Massachusetts and opened on May
19, 1927. The Ritz-Carlton Boston exemplified the vision of Cesar Ritz, reflecting the
royal atmosphere and treatment, room rates soared to the then sizable sum of $15 per
night. Soon other Ritz-Carlton hotels followed in major cities like New York,
Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh. However, only the Boston hotel survived the Great
Depression. An interesting historical note states that Edward Wyner, the Boston hotel‟s
founder, knew the Ritz-
Carlton must maintain an aura
of success, despite the gloom
of the Great Depression. His
answer was elementary. He
kept the lights on in vacant
rooms, to suggest one
hundred percent occupancy.
The Ritz-Carlton, Boston was
an innovator and
revolutionized hospitality in
America by creating in a
luxury setting, a private bath in guest room , lighter fabrics in the guest room to allow for
more thorough washing, white tie and apron uniforms for the wait staff, black tie for the
Maitre d' and morning suits for all other staff, conducive to a formal, professional
appearance , extensive fresh flowers throughout the public areas, A lá carte dining,
providing choices for diners, gourmet cuisine, utilizing the genius and cooking methods
of Auguste Escoffier(the culinary genius)and intimate, smaller lobbies for a greater
personalized guest experience
The takeover: A corporate milestone occurred in 1983, with the sale of the Boston Ritz-
Carlton and the establishment of The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C. Over the next
ten years, the company expanded rapidly, adding thirty hotels. In 1995, Marriott
53
International purchased a 49% stake in The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company and in 1998
purchased an additional 50% stake in the company giving it 99% ownership of the
company. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company partnered with Bulgari in 2001 to operate a
chain of hotels owned by and operated under the Bulgari brand. . Today fifty nine hotels
located in major cities across 20 countries worldwide, scattered from San Francisco to
Seoul, Korea, from Boston to Bali, display the Ritz-Carlton logo (Appendix 3).
(Ritz-Carlton, 2006; Wikipedia, 2006 and Lampton, 2003)
Ritz-Carlton and Quality Awards: Since its incorporation in 1983, The Ritz-Carlton
Hotel Company, L.L.C received all the major awards the hospitality industry can bestow.
The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company is the first and only hotel company honored with the
‘Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award‟ from the United States Department of
Commerce. The Ritz-Carlton is also the only service company to receive this
prestigious award two times, in 1992 and 1999 and has won various other awards as well.
(Appendix 4)
5.2 Ritz-Carlton and the “Gold Standards” of Service Quality
The foundation of the Ritz-Carlton is a set of “gold standards” by which they operate and
it encompasses its values and philosophy and includes the „Credo, Motto, Three Steps of
Service, Service Values and Employee Promise‟.
5.2.1 The Credo
The highest mission as stated by Ritz-Carlton is “genuine care and comfort of our
guests.” They pledge to provide the finest personal service and facilities to their guests
who would enjoy a “warm, relaxed, yet refined ambience.” The Ritz-Carlton experience
“enlivens the senses, instills well-being, and fulfills even the unexpressed wishes and
needs” of the guests.
54
5.2.2 Motto
The Motto of the company is that at Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C, “We are ladies
and gentlemen serving ladies and gentlemen,” which exemplifies the anticipatory service
provided by all staff members of the hotel.
5.2.3 Three Steps of Service
The three steps of service that are instructed to all staff members are as follows.
1. A warm and sincere greeting. Use the guest‟s name.
2. Anticipation and fulfillment of each guest‟s needs.
3. Fond farewell. Give a warm good-bye and use the guest‟s name.
5.2.4 Service Values
The service values are such that the staff members feel proud to be providing service
rather than simply employed at Ritz-Carlton because of the following reasons.
1. They build strong relationships and create Ritz-Carlton guests for life.
2. They are always responsive to the expressed and unexpressed wishes and needs of
their guests.
3. They are empowered to create unique, memorable and personal experiences for
their guests.
4. They understand their rule in achieving the Key Success Factors and creating The
Ritz-Carlton Mystique.
5. They continuously seek opportunities to innovate and improve The Ritz-Carlton
experience.
6. They own and immediately resolve guest problems.
7. They create a work environment of teamwork and lateral service so that the needs
of the guests and the staff members are met.
8. They have the opportunity to continuously learn and grow.
55
9. They are involved in the planning of the work that affects them.
10. They are proud of their professional appearance, language and behaviour.
11. They protect the privacy and security of their guests, fellow employees and the
company‟s confidential information and assets.
12. They are responsible for uncompromising levels of cleanliness and creating a safe
and accident-free environment.
5.2.5 Employee Promise
The Ladies and Gentlemen (staff members) serving Ladies and Gentlemen (guests) are
the most important resources in the service commitment of the company. Applying the
principles of trust, honesty, respect, integrity and commitment, the company nurtures and
maximizes talent to the benefit of each individual and the company. The Ritz-Carlton
fosters a work environment where “diversity is valued, quality of life is enhanced,
individual aspirations are fulfilled, and The Ritz-Carlton Mystique is strengthened”.
Figure 5 is a simple illustration of how the employees‟ functionality and emotional
engagement help in creating the Ritz-Carlton „Mystique‟.
Figure 5: The Ritz-Carlton „Mystique‟
Mystique
Emotional
Engagement
Functional
56
5.3 Ritz-Carlton: Current Reality
This section tabulates (Table 6) some current facts about the company which includes-
headquarters, executive officers, number of hotels and employees, sales office, marketing
partners and brand extensions.
Headquarters Located at 4445 Willard Avenue, Suite 800, Chevy Chase, Md. 20815,
United States.
Executive Officers Chief Operating Officer and President: Simon F. Cooper;
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Operations: Ken
Rehmann; President, International: Herve Humler
Number of Current 59 hotels worldwide in 20 countries (37 city hotels and 22 resorts)
Hotels
Number of employees 28,000
Sales office 11 International Sales Offices: Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, New
York, Washington D.C., Frankfurt, London, Tokyo, Hong Kong,
Singapore and Dubai
Marketing Partner Ritz London and Hotel Ritz Madrid
Hotels
Brand extensions Spas: Plans for spas continue at new or existing hotel locations
expanding the company‟s leadership position in the hotel
industry.
Golf: World class golf offered at 15 Ritz-Carlton locations and
the golf courses have been designed by the most respected
names in golf including Greg Norman and Tom Fazio, and have
hosted many PGA1 and Senior PGA events.
The Ritz-Carlton Club: There are luxury residential
condominiums located at 9 Ritz-Carlton hotels and resorts.
Features include marble foyers, walk-in closets, custom kitchen
cabinetry and the services of The Ritz-Carlton, including twice
daily maid service, valet, 24-hour room service, access to
extensive fitness and facilities.
1
The Professional Golfers‟ Association
57
The Ritz-Carlton Leadership Centre, launched in 2000, has welcomed
thousands of senior executives, managers and line staff from a various
Leadership centres industries. The Leadership Centre has flourished as a resource centre for
leading organizations interested in benchmarking many business
practices that led to The Ritz-Carlton receiving the “Malcolm Baldridge
National Quality Award” twice.
Table 6: Current reality of Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C
At this point, the reader would have a basic knowledge about the Ritz-Carlton Hotel
Company, L.L.C. The following sections would provide the reader with details about the
research findings leading into the analysis.
58
Chapter 6: Research Findings
This section provides the reader with the key findings related to the research conducted
through qualitative approach of in-depth interviews and focus groups
6.1 Focus groups findings
This section shall provide the reader with the key findings and outcome summarized from
the two focus groups conducted. The findings are presented relating to each of the
research questions.
6.1.1 Does the gap model explain the dark side of CRM?
The gap model attempts to explain the gaps in the service quality provided by a service
company. A customer expects a certain level of service quality from the luxury hotel,
which may not be duly met. This would be regarded as a gap in service quality. The
researcher tried to highlight the dark side of CRM considering the gaps in service quality
as one of the main dark sides to CRM. The members of the focus groups pointed out that
there are „loopholes‟ in every system which can also be called as gaps in the system. For
the luxury segment hotels, the main constituent of the dark side to CRM is the gaps in
service quality. The focus group members felt that it was essential for the hotel to enquire
about customer needs. The group members felt that the hotel should know what they
want and must make all efforts to know what they expect. The customers expect a certain
type of service quality from the luxury hotels for which they are willing to pay a certain
price. If the customers are not satisfied with the level of service quality provided then
they would undoubtedly demand an explanation from the hotel. As one of the members
of the focus group said,
“If I pay 200 quid for a night at a luxury hotel, I expect high class service. If I fail to receive the
desired level of service I‟d rather pay 75 quid at a lower considered hotel and receive the same kind
of service as I received from the so called classy 200 quid a night hotel.”
59
This statement well expresses the fact that when a customer pays a certain price for a
room, he desires a certain level of service experience. The failure in receiving the desired
level of service is a constituent of the dark side to CRM.
Sometimes, there exists a communication gap between the hotel and its customers which
may lead to a service gap. The members are of the view that luxury hotels promise a
certain level of service quality through various channels including advertisements,
publicity, marketing, etc. Such a promise is made by the hotel in order to gain business
and ultimately profits. This indicates that customers mean business for the hotels. Service
gaps indicate a gap in profits to a considerable extent. The gap in service quality may
arise due to a gap in management perception, quality perception, service delivery and/or
marketing communication gap. The combination of these four gaps can ultimately leads
to the perceived service quality gap. The members of the focus group were of the opinion
that gaps may exist due to the hotel‟s strategy to promise more than they can actually
deliver in order to simply gain business. Such a strategy may adversely effect the
reputation and business of the hotel. The focus group members felt that the hotel must
promise only what they can deliver. One member was of the view that, “If you can‟t
deliver don‟t offer.” Gaps in service quality do exist but if the gaps are negligible the
customers may overlook it and consider the larger image. One member said that, “We as
humans are bound to make mistakes. But the size of the mistake really matters. If the
mistake is once, it may be forgiven. Repeated mistakes are simply misbehaviour.”
Another member made a point that “If the hotel promises say a luxury swimming pool for
leisure, it cannot provide simply a bath tub sized pool for its guests.” The group members
agreed that sometimes the gap could be due to over-expectation from the hotel and they
might misinterpret the situation calling it a case of service failure or gap. Some of the
customers may possess a high expectation from the hotel in terms of service, which may
not be met duly but if the hotel has provided a standardized luxury service, it cannot be
blamed for causing a service failure which resulted in a service gap. Thus, service gaps
may occur due to hotel‟s inability to meet the desired service quality to its customers
broadly due to two reasons: 1) The hotel‟s failure to live upto the promise it made to its
customers. 2) The hotel‟s inability to live up to the expectations of the customers.
60
To summarize, the hotel cannot afford to have service gaps in the long run for any reason
whatsoever because then it will simply run out of business.
6.1.2 Is there more to the dark side of CRM than what is explained in the
gap model?
The focus groups conducted helped the researcher confirm that the gaps model well
explain the dark side to CRM. However, there is more to the dark side of CRM than
simply service gaps. The two other main constituents of the dark side are privacy issues
and changing tastes and personal preferences of customers.
From the discussions of members in the focus group, the researcher was able to realise
two other components to the dark side of CRM which are mentioned above. The
members of the focus group were of the opinion that customers do not like intrusion into
their privacy at any cost, especially when they are paying for comfort. The luxury hotels
record all possible data bout the customers in order to know them well. This according to
some members could be a case of intrusion into a customer‟s privacy and personal space.
The customers stay at the hotel for a few days to attain comfort and relaxation not
irritation. As one member commented, “I would not pay a bomb to get irritated by the
hotel who notes each and every interaction they have with me.” This shows that all
customers may not prefer to allow the hotel to know them in-depth by recording
interactions.
The hotel may attempt to build a good relationship with its customers through data
storing but this may prove adverse for the hotel as some individuals simply do not want
to build a relationship with the hotel. Another significant dark side to CRM is that the
taste and preferences of the customer may change over time. For this reason, it may prove
useless for the hotel to keep data about preferences of the customers in order to know
their customers. As one of the members said “I want a comfortable stay at the hotel, not a
relationship with them.” Another member commented that “I don‟t want the hotel to
61
know a lot about me as a person, in terms of habits and personal likes and dislikes. I like
to enjoy my personal space and privacy.”
To summarize, the researcher realises that service gaps, privacy issues, customer
preferences and the customers‟ unwillingness to build a relationship with the hotel put
together can be called the dark side to CRM. The hotels must know what their customers
want and not simply do what the hotel wants to do to keep the customers happy.
6.1.3 How can the dark side of CRM be reduced?
Research shows that there exists a dark side to CRM. The dark side exists mainly due to
gaps in service, customers‟ unwillingness to build relationships with the hotel, the
customers‟ preferences changing over time and privacy issues. In general, when there is a
problem there needs to be a solution. If the problem is not solved, it grows in size and
ultimately causes complete failure of the organization.
In the hotel industry, the dark side to CRM needs to be addressed. The focus group
members were of the opinion that service gaps can be reduced by providing efficient
service quality of a standard which shall be accepted by a wide range of customers. The
hotel must well understand the needs of individual customers and cater to them
accordingly. They must not assume about the customers which leads to a gap in service
quality. To reduce the gap, the hotel must enquire instead of assuming. The privacy
issues must be taken care of in order to reduce the dark side. As one member said, “I
don‟t want the hotel to peep into my pants and say that Sir, we are simply trying to know
what is in your pants”. This statement well explains that customers dislike their privacy
being invaded into and hampered as it completely disturbs and annoys some customers.
62
The hotel must seek permission of the customer before keeping track of his preferences.
The preferences of the customer may change over time and it is the hotel‟s duty to keep
itself updated. As one member said,
“If the hotel does record my likes and preferences during my stay, it is their responsibility to
keep updating my likes and preferences over time. It is not necessary that if I like a particular
wine during my stay at one time, I will also want the same wine during my next stay. They
should update my preferences by asking me instead of presenting me with the wine I liked
previously when I check into my room the next time.”
The hotels in the greed to get regular business choose to build a long lasting relationship
with their customers and try to know them in order to please them. However, they should
respect some customers‟ decision to not build a relationship. If the hotel discovers that
the customer does not want to build a relationship it should not make an effort to attempt
building one. As one member said “ if I don‟t want to provide personal information about
myself to the hotel, they must respect my point of view instead of noting interactions
between the hotel and me at all possible instances.”
To summarize, the hotel must make the effort to reduce the darker side of CRM by
providing the customers with what they have promised to them, what the customers want
and expect, update knowledge about their customers, respect the customers point of view,
not intrude into the customers‟ personal privacy and not attempt building a relationship
when the customer chooses to not build one. Following this section, are the key findings
of the interviews conducted by the researcher.
6.2 In-depth interview findings
The researcher interviewed customers as well as some employees at the hotel to highlight
the dark side of CRM in the luxury segment hotel industry. The key findings of the
interview are presented below relating to the research question.
63
6.2.1 Customer Interviews
6.2.1.1 Does the gap model explain the dark side of CRM?
The researcher interviewed travellers in Barcelona, Dubai, London and Paris to discover
the dark side of CRM in the luxury segment hotel industry. After interviewing a number
of travellers, the researcher noted that a considerable chunk of the dark side is the gaps in
service quality i.e. gaps between expected and experienced service quality. The
interviewees pointed out that a traveller has a certain image in mind of the luxury hotel
they have booked along with a set of expectations which differ from individual to
individual. When a traveller pays a considerable amount of money they expect a certain
level of service in return. One interviewee said “If I pay 250 quid a night for a luxury
hotel, I want much more than a bed, breakfast and toilet.” The customers are willing to
sacrifice an amount in return for luxury as they perceive it themselves. One interviewee
claimed that “When I pay for a stay at a luxury hotel, I want luxury as defined by me and
not by any other person.”
Often luxury hotels promise or guarantee a certain level of comfort which they measure
and define according to the decisions of the management of the hotel and not necessarily
customers. This aspect may lead to a gap in service quality where the customer expects
much more from the term luxury than is actually provided by the hotel. One traveller told
that he recently booked a luxury hotel and was promised high class service. When he
actually stayed there, he was disgusted to such an extent that he decided to vacate the
hotel immediately. The management of the hotel did not cooperate much and the traveller
lost his time, money and a looked forward to holiday. This service gap was not even tried
to be closed by the management who promised high class service. The traveller
disappointed from his experience, commented that it is an old saying that “promises are
made to be broken.” The dark side of CRM is the variation in the promised service
quality and the actual delivered quality of service. Some travellers when deeply involved
in the interview mentioned that “there is a dark side to everything and what is more
important is to see the larger picture.” The dark side in the hotel industry is the inability
64
to live up to expectations to each and every guest at the hotel. Miscommunications do
occur in the hotel industry between the management and guest or the guest and members
of staff. This communication gap can often lead to situations where the relationship with
the guest is spoilt forever. As one interviewee shared, “I don‟t care how they manage to
deliver the service I expect them to. I am paying for them to be alert about what I want
and aware of my expectations and fulfil the same.”
Thus, the researcher after interviewing the travellers observed that the gap model surely
does explain the dark side of CRM to quite an extent but not completely. The
interviewees mentioned other aspects which are also a part of the dark side and cannot be
neglected by the hotel industry.
6.2.1.2 Is there more to the dark side of CRM than what is explained in the gap
model?
The gap model discusses that there exists gaps between experienced and expected service
quality which has been considered as one of the main reasons for the dark side prevailing
in the hotel industry. However, there are some other important issues to be dealt with by
the hotels in order to reduce the dark side. Most of the interviewees spoke about privacy
issues which should be an area of concern for luxury hotels. In general, most of the
luxury hotels note down customer preferences, likes, dislikes, etc to understand their
customers better. What they fail to understand is that some customers may simply dislike
the hotels to note each and every interaction between the guest and the hotel. One of the
interviewee said that “I dislike the hotel trying to get to familiar with my personal
preferences. I do not like intrusion into my personal space and privacy.” One of the
interviewees said that she does not mind the hotel keeping a record of her details like
name, address, contact details, birthday and anniversary. However, she would not want
the hotel to note if she has “accessed a pay channel to watch pornographic movies on the
television during her stay at the hotel.” This would be strongly offensive to her and she
would probably never go back to that hotel. Some customers do not like the hotel to
know too much about them. One of the interviewee said that a particular hotel noted his
65
preference for Davidoff cigars during a previous stay. On his next stay the hotel
presented a box of Davidoff cigars to the guest before he checked into his room. The
interviewee surely appreciated the hotel‟s efforts to try to know what his preferences are.
At the same time, he informed the hotel that he had quit smoking. This highlights that the
hotel does not keep its records updated about the customers all the time. Tastes and
preferences of customers may change over time and interviewees felt that often the
information the hotels have about their customers is not up-to-date. One of the
interviewee expressed that there is a certain distance that needs to be maintained by the
hotel towards its customers in terms of trying to know them. He said that “I would not
want a hotel to know what type and brand of condom I use. Some hotels are capable of
noting the brand and type of used condom found in the dustbin in order to know more
about their customers. The hotels must not intrude into my privacy at any cost.”
The researcher found through interviewees that customers get annoyed if the hotel tries to
know them more than they want the hotel to know them. Intrusion into privacy is not
tolerated by customers. Customers appreciate the hotels‟ efforts to know their tastes and
preferences if they want the hotel to know about it i.e. it does not offend them and also if
the notes about the customers are up-to-date. Some customers may not want to have a
relationship with the hotels and would be highly agitated if the hotel does not respect
their decision.
6.2.1.3 How can the dark side of CRM be reduced?
The interviews confirmed that there surely is a dark side to CRM in the hotel industry.
The interviewees highlighted the main components that make up the dark side to be gaps
in service quality, privacy issues, unwillingness of customers to build relationships with
hotels and their changing tastes and preferences which are not kept updated by the hotel.
The interviewees suggested some ways which could possibly reduce the dark side. One of
the interviewees said that “if there is a gap in service, the hotel must make sure that it
closes such gaps.” Many of the interviewees were of the opinion that the hotels can
provide what they promise and guarantee in order to reduce gaps in service quality. Some
66
interviewees felt that the hotel must comprehend what the customers expect from their
stay and by providing whatever the customers need, the hotels can possibly reduce the
dark side. The interviewees strongly recommend that hotels must respect the privacy of
the guests and not note information about the guest which is somewhat personal. They
should respect the fact that some customers stay at the hotel for a holiday only and not to
build a long lasting relationship with the hotel. The hotel should not try to know more
about the customer in hope for future business if the customer does not want so. One
interviewee recommended that, “the hotels must do what the customers want and not
what they want. If the hotel tries to intrude into the privacy of the customer, they shall
probably lose the customer forever.” The interviewees suggest that service recovery is
essential to reduce the dark side when there are gaps or service failures. Some
interviewees were of the opinion that if there is a gap in service or any privacy issue or
whatsoever; the customer may choose to complain to the management about it. Such a
situation is a golden opportunity for the hotel to reduce the dark side immediately by
appropriate complaint handling and ensuring that the customers are pleased.
The researcher learnt that the possible ways to reduce the dark side are not too
complicated to practice. However, the existence of dark side could be complicated for the
hotel industry. The next portion of this chapter shall be a summarized description of the
findings through interviews conducted with some members of staff at the luxury hotel
properties.
6.2.2 Employee Interviews
The interviews conducted with the members of staff were essential in order to know
about the dark side of CRM from the service providers‟ point of view. The employees
were of the opinion that the main dark side to CRM is that there many a times exist gaps
between service expected by the customer and service experienced. The members of staff
honestly admitted that sometimes it is not practically possible to please each and every
customer.
67
The employees shared some experiences with the researcher relating to the dark side of
CRM. One employee said that, “Once I was serving breakfast to this gentleman at his
room. I knocked on his door and awaited permission to entry. The guest did not respond
and I knocked again in a minute or two. I heard an angry voice asking me why I haven‟t
come in after knocking once. I apologized as soon as I entered the room and received no
response again. I served the food at the round table in one corner of the room. The guest
in an agitated manner asked me to serve on the bed instead. I apologized again and served
on the bed requesting permission to leave him to enjoy his breakfast.” This incident
shows that sometimes customers expect certain behaviour from the hotel staff which may
be surprising to the staff. The staff must do as the customer wants to please him, even if it
is not what the staff is trained to do by the management.
One employee informed that supposing a customer enquires about the toilet, the
employees are not supposed to point out where it is and give them directions. Indeed,
they are expected to escort the guest till the door of the toilet. Some customers do not like
this and want the directions verbally. The employees told that they are not supposed to let
the guest carry the luggage under any circumstances. However, there are some guests
who prefer to carry a part of their luggage like a briefcase or laptop bag on their own.
They do not wish the luggage to be touched by any member of staff. An employee said
that sometimes petty incidents may irritate the guest even if it is done by the hotel for the
guests‟ well being and comfort. Such situations have to be dealt with carefully and
tactfully in order to please the customer.
Sometimes, the staff makes an attempt to be friendly with the guests and the guests
misinterpret it to be intrusion into personal space. One employee said that while serving
one lady guest at the hotel he tried to be friendly with her in order to make her feel
comfortable and warm at the hotel. However she misinterpreted it to be flirting. The
employee said that she actually complained to the manager saying that he was trying to
“flirt with me because I‟m hot and sexy.” The employee said that if he had not been
warm and friendly she would probably complain that he was “extremely rude and
inhospitable”. The researcher learnt that often members of staff have to serve the
68
customers to please them out of mere duty rather than willingness. One of the employees
confessed that, “Many times I have had to serve the customers in a particular matter
merely out of compulsion.” One of the dark sides to CRM is also the fact that employees
may not be serving whole-heartedly.
The following chapter shall be an analysis section where the research questions shall be
addressed blending all the information gathered by the researcher through various
channels. The reader shall also find some interesting quotes by interviewees and focus
group members which have not been mentioned earlier in the research findings section.
The analysis shall lead to the conclusion of the paper.
69
Chapter 7: Analysis of Research Findings
This section shall provide the reader with analyses of the research findings. The research
questions have been addressed to a large extent through the help of the research
conducted.
7.1 Does the gap model explain the dark side of CRM?
Parasuraman et al (1988) came up with the „gap model‟ which explained the five gaps
i.e. The Management Perception Gap, The Quality Specification Gap, The Service
Delivery Gap, The Marketing Communication Gap, and The Perceived Service Quality
Gap that exist in service quality of a service provider. These five gaps have been
described in the literature review section. The model has been applied to Ritz-Carlton to
investigate if there is a dark side to CRM in the case of Ritz-Carlton, and to what extent
does this model explain the dark side. The following portion of this chapter shall provide
analysis based on the individual gaps mentioned in the „gap model.‟
7.1.1 Ritz-Carlton and the „Gap model‟
1. The Management Perception Gap
This gap occurs when the management perceives the quality expectations inaccurately
due to various reasons as mentioned earlier in the literature review section. In the case of
Ritz-Carlton, primary research conducted proves that management perception gap does
occur to some extent. The motto of the hotel is, “We are ladies and gentlemen serving
ladies and gentlemen.” This motto definitely sounds promising and dignified but there is
a gap that exists here. The hotel may undoubtedly recruit fine quality staff and train them
appropriately to deliver high quality service. However, some customers may simply not
want such treatment while they are on holiday. For example, one customer interviewed at
The Ritz, London said, “I am expected to wear a jacket and tie in some areas of the hotel
like the dining room. I am here on holiday and I would be most comfortable in a pair of
70
casuals strolling around the hotel. I don‟t want to pay 400 pounds a night to not be able to
wear what I want on holiday.”
The management of Ritz-Carlton surely tries its level best to deliver service of high
quality, but they must understand that some customers do not want to be so elegantly
dealt with all the time. Some customers expect a casual atmosphere while they are on
holiday and a very classy and formal set up could make them feel uneasy and
uncomfortable. One customer interviewed at the Hotel Arts, Barcelona expressed that,
“The hotel is classy and elegant. The service is remarkable. However, I wish the hotel atmosphere was
slightly casual and relaxed. Sometimes, an elegant set up may bring you discomfort mentally. Barcelona is
a relaxed city and I feel conscious moving around the hotel in a relaxed manner because it is a bit too
glamorous for a destination like Barcelona.”
Some of the focus group members felt that it was most important for a luxury hotel to be
customer oriented in practice. The management must make all the efforts to know
accurately what the customers expect.
These examples highlight the fact that there surely is a management perception gap that
exists and the management must try to close this gap. Management must know what the
customers at their hotels want and not try to provide an extra classy ambience if it is not
desired by all the customers.
2. The Quality Specification Gap
This gap signifies that service quality specifications are not consistent with management
perceptions of quality expectations earlier explained in the literature review chapter. In
the case of Ritz-Carlton, the management is surely a team of expert professionals.
However, a minute quality specification gap does exist. Primary research shows that
some employees when interviewed confess that “many-a-times they have to behave in a
manner they do not wish to behave in.” The members of staff have to be prim and proper
71
all the time and respond to customers in a certain manner even if the customer is outright
rude towards them. This surely hampers the inner motivation of employees and they
perform just because they are “supposed to and expected to behave and serve in a
particular manner” and not because they wish to. The expectations of service differ
among individual customers and the hotel must be aware of what is the expected service.
One of the focus group members said, “Service quality is what the customer defines it to
be or wants it to be. It is not what the management perceives it to be. It should be purely
based on the perception of the customers.” This gap was found to be minute in the case of
Ritz-Carlton from whatever primary research that was conducted. However, this gap
must be filled in order to ensure service quality as desired by the customers.
3. The Service Delivery Gap
This gap means that quality specifications are not met by performance in the service
production and delivery process due to reasons that can be divided into three categories
as discussed earlier: management supervision, employee perception of specifications and
rules/customer needs and wishes, and a lack of technological/operational support. In the
case of Ritz-Carlton, such gap does not really exist at a considerable scale as seen from
primary research. The customers interviewed across the four properties mentioned
nothing about mismanagement or supervision. In fact, they appreciate the overall
management. The point they mentioned was that sometimes the employee perception of
customer needs and wants may differ from what the customers actually want. The
employees are trained to deliver service of high quality but may lack capability to have
complete knowledge of what the customers want. The customers pass down requests like
hypoallergenic pillows, particular wines, chocolates, etc which is met by the hotel staff.
However, the customers will not request the hotel about each and every expectation they
have in mind. The hotel staff must be strongly observant to know what the customers
really want in terms of service. All employees may not be efficient enough to observe
accurately and this leads to a gap.
72
The Ritz-Carlton believes in the three steps of service which is:
A warm and sincere greeting. Use the guest‟s name.
Anticipation and fulfillment of each guest‟s needs.
Fond farewell. Give a warm good-bye and use the guest‟s name.
Some of the interviewed customers said that they were surely greeted personally by
members of staff during their stay. However, at times they felt that, “the greeting was not
warm enough. It seemed that they greeted us simply because they were supposed to and
not out of willingness.” Another interesting point one customer mentioned was that, “I
don‟t like to be addressed by my name in a hotel. I prefer to be called „Sir,‟ not Mr. So
and So.” The service values that Ritz-Carlton claims that all its employees believe in does
not exist in practice unanimously. This was discovered through the employee interviews
conducted.
The Ritz-Carlton is well equipped with technological/ operational support. As informed
by the employees during interviews, the observations made by members of staff are fed
into the system to be used for future reference by any member of staff in any Ritz-
Carlton property worldwide. Once a note is made it exists in the system easily accessible
to all employees as and when required. The special requests and preferences of customers
are noted in the system and saved for future. The customers confirmed the fact that their
special requests were met throughout Ritz-Carlton properties worldwide. One customer
told that he was staying at Ritz-Carlton in Singapore where he had requested a particular
wine during his stay. After a few months he stayed at Ritz-Carlton in Puerto Rico, where
he found the same wine presented to him at his room upon check-in. However, there is
one gap identified, which is the fact that the entries made to the system are manual i.e.
made by employees which suggests that there is always a possibility of errors that the
employees may commit due to faulty observational notes or simply manual mistakes.
One focus group member commented, “A human being is prone to committing mistakes,
but he must learn from his mistakes and not repeat them. Repeated mistakes are
73
misbehavior. I can forgive a mistake but not misbehavior.” Another issue is that updating
information about the customers is essential to know them as of date. Most customers
said that the information the hotel possessed about them such as preferences, special
requests, etc was up-to-date unlike many other hotels.
Ritz-Carlton must ensure that the service delivery gap which hardly exists is closed to
further improve its already renowned reputation for high class service quality.
4. The Marketing Communication Gap
This gap occurs when promises given by market communication activities are not
consistent with the service delivered, discussed earlier in literature review section. From
the primary research conducted, there was no mention of any market communication gap
as such. Ritz-Carlton seems to be delivering overall service that it promises through
various channels of communication to the population. As one of the employees said,
“Ritz-Carlton stands in such a position globally that it cannot afford to spoil its reputation
by faulty marketing communication strategies.”
5. The Perceived Service Quality Gap
As mentioned earlier in the literature review chapter, such gap occurs as a net result of
the four gaps mentioned above. This gap signifies that the perceived or experienced
service is not consistent with the expected service. Interestingly, this gap could be
positive or negative. A positive gap suggests that the service delivered over-met the
expectations of the customers, while negative gap obviously suggests expectations being
under-met. In the case of Ritz-Carlton, such gap exists as a result of the four gaps
mentioned above, but not at a large scale. As a matter of fact, most customers rated the
overall service quality experienced to be satisfactory. One of the focus group members,
an actual customer of Ritz-Carlton said that he was over-satisfied with the overall service
delivered. None of the customers interviewed at the four properties expressed
dissatisfaction from the overall service they experienced. One customer at The Ritz, Paris
74
commented that, “I would rate the overall service delivered 11 on 10.” This remark
clearly shows that customers are delighted staying at the Ritz-Carlton. The average rating
of experienced service quality was eight and a half on ten which implies that although
there are some gaps in service quality, the overall service experienced and delivered is
appreciable by customers. However, it is not absolutely perfect. Customers have
mentioned a few points about the hotel which could be considered as the dark side even
though they felt that the overall service is “extra-ordinary.”
7.1.2 General Inference for the luxury hotel sector
This model does explain the dark side of CRM to a large extent but not completely. The
focus group members as well as the interviewees mentioned gaps in service quality as a
major dark side to CRM in hotel industry. Issues of service quality are top priority for
many customers. The customers are unwilling to accept service that does not meet their
expectations by far. Hotel industry certainly suffers from service quality problems with
the exception of some renowned hotel chains where service quality problems are in
minute number. One such classic case of high class service is Ritz-Carlton Hotel
Company.
Focus group members were of the opinion that, “no institution can measure the service
quality of a luxury hotel. The measurement of service quality should be based purely and
solely on customers‟ point of view.” The customer experience is most important in
judging the service quality of a hotel. Some interviewees said that the overall experience
with the hotel counts in judging the service quality. The interviewees informed that
many-a-times customers could be disappointed or dissatisfied by the overall experience
they have with a luxury hotel. Service guarantee is ensured by most of the luxury hotels,
but what is guaranteed may not me fulfilled all the time and by all the luxury hotels. The
management of the hotels is responsible for the low service quality. Many customers feel
that the member of staff is delivering poor service, but if analysis is done, the real story
could be something else. The management is responsible for training the staff and
explaining their roles, duties and responsibilities. If the management is particular about
75
every aspect of service delivery, then the members of staff will not gather the courage to
deliver low quality of service. The staff shall fear adverse consequences and would not
have the audacity to not serve as expected. The focus group members and the
interviewees mentioned gaps in service quality as one of the key constituents of the dark
side to CRM in hotel industry. However, there is more to the dark side which shall be
addressed in the next research question.
7.2 Is there more to the dark side of CRM than what is explained in
the gap model?
The gap model explained the dark side of CRM in the luxury hotel industry to a large
extent. However, analysis of facts derived from research throws light upon some other
aspects as well which shall be discussed in this section. The information collected shall
be applied to the case of Ritz-Carlton and the reader shall also receive deeper knowledge
about the dark side for the hotel industry in general.
There is not sufficient literature available on the dark side to CRM except for the gap
model. Some books have mentioned about privacy issues which was discovered to be an
important issue apart from the service gaps. Some authors have written that it is not
necessary that all customers would desire to build a relationship with the service
provider.
7.2.1 Willingness to build a relationship
In the case of Ritz-Carlton, most of the customers said that they would love to build a
relationship with the hotel company. The reasons for desiring a relationship are
mentioned below:
1. Recognition: Most customers shared that they felt valued and recognized
building a relationship with Ritz-Carlton. One customer said that, “I feel
recognized and valued when I receive a birthday or anniversary greeting from
76
Ritz-Carlton. It makes me feel important being wished by such a glamorous hotel
company.” Another customer said that he feels like a “V.I.P.” when the members
of staff at Ritz-Carlton recognize him and greet him. Most of the focus group
members expressed their desire to be recognized by Ritz-Carlton. One speaker
said, “I would love to be recognized by a hotel chain as sophisticated as Ritz-
Carlton.”
2. Personalization: Most customers wished to build a relationship with the hotel
chain because they felt that by doing so that could receive personalized service.
The individual needs of the customers and their special requests would be catered
to. One customer said, “I would not have to inform the hotel about my special
requests and preferences each and every time I check in to a Ritz-Carlton
property. They have my requests on their information system and that eases my
stay and increases my comfort level.” One focus group member said that “a
relationship can help receive the customer his/her desired level of personalized
service.” Literature available on Ritz-Carlton mentions that once a customer has
stayed at any Ritz-Carlton properties, his/her guest profile is created and all data
about the customer including special preferences and requests is noted and used
for future stays of the guest at any Ritz-Carlton.
3. Status: Another strong reason for customers to build a relationship with Ritz-
Carlton is the social status attached. Most customers reveal that it is a “status
symbol to share a relationship with a prestigious hotel chain like Ritz-Carlton.”
One customer informed that, “I get an ego boost when Ritz-Carlton has
information about me. It increases my status and is a „feel good factor‟ for me.”
One of the focus group members commented that, “If information about me was
with Ritz-Carlton, I would feel I have high social status.”
However, it is not true that all customers want a relationship with Ritz-Carlton. This is a
dark side to CRM. The Ritz-Carlton cannot cater to the needs of the customers if they do
not have sufficient information about the customer because of the customer‟s
77
unwillingness to build a relationship. One of the customers said, “I enjoy staying at Ritz-
Carlton but I don‟t want to build a relationship with them. I would not want them to know
too much about me. I don‟t mind informing them of my requests and preferences every
time I stay at Ritz-Carlton.” Another dark side identified is that Ritz-Carlton does not
have any loyalty card of its own to provide mileage to the customers. Most of the luxury
hotel chains have a loyalty card to provide points to the customers that can be redeemed
later for room upgrades, free stays, etc. One customer said, “I wish Ritz-Carlton had a
loyalty programme. It would please me further.”
Privacy Issues and Changing tastes and preferences of the customers
Research shows that privacy issues are an area of concern for customers. The Ritz-
Carlton notes all requests and preferences of the customers and interactions at all
instances. The employees interviewed confirm the literature available that each and every
interaction, requests and preferences of the customers must be noted and fed on the
information system to help them serve the customers better. The customers when
interviewed did mention that privacy issues are one of their concerns. Some customers do
not want their privacy intruded into at any cost. They appreciate the fact that their
requests and preferences are met by the hotel during their stays. However, they do not
approve of the hotel noting each and every interaction and observation. One customer
said, “It is irritating if someone knows too much about me. I would not want the hotel to
know each and everything about me and my personality.” Some customers feel offended
when they realize that the hotel knows too much about them. This portion of the dark side
is again minute in the case of Ritz-Carlton because none of the members interviewed
mentioned any sort of misusage of information the hotel has about them. One customer
said that the Ritz-Carlton provides comfortable service to its customers but sometimes,
they note too much about the customers and it could make the customers feel insecure
about their private information being in records at a hotel. Ritz-Carlton notes all possible
information to serve the customers better, but it must know if the customers are
comfortable with having personal information in their records.
78
Another aspect of the dark side of CRM is that tastes and preferences of the customers
change over time. It is not necessary that a customer‟s wants will remain uniform
throughout. Ritz-Carlton customers said that the hotel puts in serious effort to know what
the current or updated preferences of the customers are so that they can serve them better
and meet their expectations. One customer said, “Everytime I check in to a Ritz-Carlton
hotel, they inquire if I‟d like something I had requested for at a previous visit and they
update my preferences accordingly.”
The dark side is small in case of Ritz-Carlton, but the dark side in the hotel industry at
large is not that small. The case of Ritz-Carlton is one which should educate the other
players to follow their footsteps to help achieve better customer satisfaction. The
following section is the inference for the industry.
7.2.2 General Inference for the Hotel Industry
There is surely more to the dark side than what is explained with the help of „gap model.‟
The other issues are discussed above with the application to the case of Ritz-Carlton.
Privacy issues cannot be neglected by hoteliers. Most customers are worried about their
information being misused or swapped. The hotel industry must ensure that the privacy
concerns are dealt with. Changing tastes and preferences of customers must be updated
perpetually. The unwillingness of customers to build a relationship with the hotels must
be attempted to convert into willingness. One focus group member commented, “The
relationship must be a genuine one meeting our level of expectations.”
7.3 How can the dark side of CRM be reduced?
There is evidence collected that there is a dark side to CRM in the hotel industry. The
reduction of the dark side to CRM is essential for the profitable future of the hotel
industry. Hotels earn profits through their customers and if the customers do not feel that
their experienced service quality was up-to-the mark, then it can be a serious threat to the
hotel‟s well being in the future. The following portion shall provide an analysis on how
79
the dark side in case of Ritz-Carlton can be reduced followed by an analysis on dark side
reduction for the hotel industry in general.
In the case of Ritz-Carlton, the dark side prevailing is not large proven by research.
However, the dark side that exists needs to be reduced to enhance Ritz-Carlton‟s
reputation of high class service quality. The gaps in service quality have been identified
and discussed earlier. The Ritz-Carlton must take appropriate steps to fill the gaps in
service quality. This can be done by simple measures like the management being clearly
aware of what the customers‟ needs and expectations are, training the staff effectively to
tactfully deal with crisis situations like service failure or dispute, providing the service
that customers want, meeting the expectation level of its customers, maintaining the
uniformity of service worldwide for which it already is reputed and improving its overall
service delivery to further strengthen its status and position in the global hotel industry.
The employees must serve the customers willingly as this will increase their level of
service and please the customer.
Employee interviews confirmed the literature available that The Ritz-Carlton empowers
all its employees to settle a customer dispute by spending up to $2,000 per day without
consulting any senior. Vice President Diana Oreck says “hotel standards are so high and
service-recovery training is so rigorous that no employee has ever had to provide a
$2,000 credit” (USA Today.com, 2006). The service recovery is given importance by the
Ritz-Carlton to reduce service gaps that may occur from time-to-time. One customer said
that she was staying at Ritz-Carlton in Dubai and her room had some ants. She
complained about it and the matter was resolved immediately. The member of staff she
complained to, without any delay shifted her to a superior room at no extra cost and
apologized for the inconvenience caused to her. She was impressed by the quick
complaint handling and was delighted. Complaint handling is essential to reduce the dark
side and the Ritz-Carlton already follows the concept. It needs to ensure that the
complaint handling is efficient and helps in seeking positive response from the customer
and leaves him/her satisfied. The hotel industry can benefit from following the Ritz-
Carlton way of pleasing customers.
80
The hotel industry can reduce the dark side of CRM by simple measures. Some of the
possible ways to reduce the dark side are as follows.
1. Accurate knowledge of what the customers want, need and expect
2. Once the management knows what the customers expect, relevant instruction
should be passed down to the members of staff to cater to the customers‟
expectations accordingly
3. The members of staff must carry out their tasks to fulfill the customers‟
expectations whole-heartedly. This helps in adding the extra „personal touch.‟
4. The members of staff must maintain a cordial and warm relationship with the
customers, keeping in mind their individual preferences and fulfilling the same.
5. In case of service failure or dispute, the employees must act immediately to
resolve the situation and leave the customer pleased. The hotel industry must
empower the staff to take immediate action and give them monetary allowance to
resolve the situation quickly without wasting time to consult senior management
like they do at Ritz-Carlton.
6. The hotel industry can deliver the service the customers want to avoid
discrepancies in service. However, if there is any service failure and the
customers choose to complain, the hotels should consider this as a golden
opportunity to restore service quality. Literature available (mentioned earlier)
suggests that only a small percentage of the customers choose to complain.
Efficient complaint handling shall prove beneficial and advantageous to the hotel
industry for its profitable future.
7. Customers must be treated with highest regards, respect and dignity even if they
are rude. This shall prevent the situation from getting worse and service recovery
might be possible.
8. The service gaps must be closed by efficient management and supervision. The
staff should be carefully recruited and trained. Literature available confirmed by
employee interviews show that employees at Ritz-Carlton undergo rigorous and
detailed training to tackle situations and deliver top class service quality. The
81
hotels must select and recruit staff carefully and train them to deliver remarkable
service quality
9. The top priority of a luxury hotel is to provide luxury to please the customers. The
members of staff and management must have a clear understanding of what is
required to be done in order to achieve customers‟ appreciation.
10. The hotels can have an advanced information system that records all customer
details and preferences and is accessible by any property of the chain worldwide,
similar to how it is done at Ritz-Carlton.
11. The hotel industry must secure and safeguard the customers‟ private information
and prevent any misusage. The customers must be given importance, cared and
looked after sincerely.
12. The privacy of the customers must not be intruded into under any circumstances.
13. The hotels must strongly meet or over-meet the customers‟ expectations in order
to sustain their future because for hotels, customers are the only source of income
and they cannot afford to put their profits at stake.
To summarize, the hotel industry must learn from Ritz-Carlton which received various
quality awards and the only company to receive the ‘Malcolm Baldrige National Quality
Award‟ twice till date. One customer said, “The hotels must deliver what we want them
to deliver and how we want them to deliver. This shall prevent any form of service gaps
and shall reduce the dark side completely.” Another customer said that all that luxury
hotels need to do is “provide luxury the way customers demand it.” One focus group
member pointed out that, “I want the luxury hotel to provide me with service and not just
amenities/ facilities without a personal touch. I would not be impressed by expensive
chandeliers but would be impressed by desired behaviour.” In the end, all that matters is
customer satisfaction and the service delivery must be customer-oriented to reduce the
dark side to CRM
82
Chapter 8: Conclusion and Further research
This is the concluding chapter of the paper and shall shed light upon the limitations of
this research conducted along with possible implications this paper shall have for the
luxury segment hotels worldwide. The hotel industry is a customer-oriented industry and
its success wholly depends on the customers. The research objectives of explaining the
dark side of CRM in the hotel industry with the help of the „gap model‟ was successfully
accomplished. The gap model does not fully explain the dark side of CRM in luxury
hotels and there is more to the dark side than only service gaps. Privacy issues are a
major concern among customers today. Luxury hotels must ensure that customer privacy
is safeguarded. The changing tastes and preferences of customers must be tracked and
recorded to improve service quality. Relationships once established must be maintained
living up to the expectations of the customers. One focus group member commented,
“The relationship must be a genuine one meeting our level of expectations.”
The research has shown that basically customers have their own perceptions of service
quality. The customers want service as per their expectations. Service gaps are not
normally tolerated by many customers, especially when they are paying for a luxurious
stay. The customers pay importance to what they receive and how they receive. The
customers may forgive small errors in service but not repeated service failures and
misbehaviour of any sort from the hotel management or staff. The customers‟ desire
service as per their individual definitions and fulfillment of desires leads to satisfaction.
The hotels must treat customers as human beings and not just objects or avenues to earn
profits. The attitude of the hotel should be customer-oriented and the customers receiving
desired service quality must be prime concern for the hotel.
In the case of Ritz-Carlton, the service gaps occur minutely as shown by research. Other
hotels can learn from the case of Ritz-Carlton and keep an updated knowledge about the
customer expectations and preferences to allow superior service quality which in turn
83
could lead to customer satisfaction which means business to the hotels. Complaints must
be handled efficiently and immediately to recover service failures and customer disputes.
The reduction of the dark side can be possible with improved service quality and fast
service recovery in case of disputes or service failures. The luxury hotels must strive to
enhance their service quality which shall prove to be a key success factor for the
organization. There should be zero defects in service quality to eliminate the dark side of
CRM in the hotel industry.
This paper shall be useful for the hotel industry to analyze the dark side of CRM. The
hotels can have in-depth information about customer expectations in terms of service
quality. This paper could prove helpful in providing a guideline to the luxury hotels to
bring about improvement in service quality to gain and retain customers. Last but not the
least, the luxury hotels could follow the Indian concept of “Atithi Devo Bhavah,” which
is “Guest is God.”
Further Research: There is also further research scope in this area of CRM in the hotel
industry. There is ample literature available on the brighter side of CRM in the hotel
industry. There are innumerous articles suggesting the high class service provided by
Ritz-Carlton and also other luxury hotel chains but there is not much literature available
on the dark side of CRM. Scholars can carry out research on the dark side and conduct
detailed study on the customers‟ perception of perfect service quality. Time is required to
conduct a detailed study on the dark side of CRM and such studies shall provide valuable
data for the luxury hotels to comprehend extensively customers‟ expectations and ensure
that they are met at least if not over-met.
84
References
Anderson, E.W. (1994), “Cross Strategy variation in customer satisfaction and retention”,
Marketing Letters,Vol. 5, Winter, pp. 19-30
Anderson, E.W. & Mittal,V. (2000), “Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain”,
Journal of Service Research, Vol. 3(2), pp 107-120
Barsky, J (1992), “Customer satisfaction in the hotel industry: measurement and
meaning”, Cornell H.R.A. Quarterly, 7, pp.20-41
Baumeister, H. (unknown), “Customer Relationship Management for SMEs”, Available
at http://www.crm2day.com/library/EpFZEpykZkPeADiEcE.php, [last accesed on
September 4, 2006
Bejou, D., Ennuw, C. and Palmer, A., (1998), “Trust, ethics and relationship
satisfaction”, Journalof Bank Marketing 16(4), pp 170.
Bennett, R. (1996), “Relationship formation and governance in consumer markets:
transactional analysis versus the behaviourist approach”, Journal of Marketing
Management, 12(12), pp. 417-436.
Bhote, K.R (1996), “Beyond Customer Satisfaction to Customer Loyalty”, New York:
AMA Management Briefing
Body, L. and Limayem, M. (2004), “The Impact of Customer Relationship Management
on Customer Loyalty: The Moderating Role of Web Site Characteristics”, Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(4)
Boshoff, C. and Allen, J.(2000), “The influence of selected antecedents on frontline
staff‟s perception of service recovery performance”, International Journal of Service
Industry Management, 11(1)
Bowen, J., Shoemaker, S. (1998), “Loyalty: a strategic commitment”, Cornell H.R.A.
Quarterly, 2, pp.12-25.
Burgess J. (1996), “Focusing on fear”, Area 28 (2), pp. 130-36.
Buttle, F.A. (1998), “Word-of- mouth: understanding and managing referral marketing”,
Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6, pp 241-54
Buttle, F. (2004), Customer Relationship Management: concepts and tools, Oxford:
Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann
Caruana, A., Money, A.H. and Berthon, P.R. (2000), “Service quality and satisfaction-the
moderating role of value”, European Journal of Marketing, 34 (11/12), 1338-53.
85
Castorina, J.A. (1989), “Alcances del método de exploración crítica en psicología
genética”, In J.A. Castorina, S.L. Fernández et al. Psicología genética. Aspectos
metodológicos e implicancias pedagógicas. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávi
Chen, I.J. & Popovich, K. (2003), “Understanding customer relationship management
(CRM): People, process and technology,” Business Process Management Journal, vol.
9(5), pp. 672-688
Chow, S., & Holden, R.(1997). “Toward an understanding of loyalty: The moderating
role of trust”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 275-298
Creswell, J. W. (1997), “Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among
Five Traditions”, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Cronin, J.J. Jr, Taylor, S.A (1992), “Measuring service quality: a re-examination and
extension,” Journal of Marketing, 56, pp.55-68.
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1998), “Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative
Materials”, London: Sage Publications
Designs, available at http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/design.htm, last accessed
on September 2, 2006
Dick, A. & Basu, K. (1994), “Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated conceptual
Framework”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), pp. 99-113
Evans, J. R., & Laskin, R. L. (1994), “The relationship marketing process: A
conceptualization and application”, Industrial Marketing Management, 23(5), 439-452
EURHOTEC (2000), Customer Relationship Management: A Bold New Direction For
Hospitality Marketing , available at
http://www.hospitalitynet.org/news/4004150.search?query=customer+relationship+mana
gement+in+hotel+industry, accessed on August 26, 2006
Feagin, J., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.). (1991), “ A case for case study”, Chapel Hill,
NC: University of North Carolina Press
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006), “Five Misunderstandings about Case Study Research”, Qualitative
Inquiry,” 12 (2,) pp. 219-245
Fornier, S. (1994), “A Consumer-based Relationship Framework for Strategic Brand
Management”, published PhD dissertation, University of Florida.
Gefen, D. (2002), “Customer loyalty in e-commerce”, Journal of the Association for
Information Systems, (3), 27-51.
86
Getty, J.M, Thompson, K.N (1994), “The relationship between quality, satisfaction, and
recommending behaviour in lodging decision”, Journal of Hospitality & Leisure
Marketing, 2(3), pp.3-22
Goss J.D., Leinbach T.R. (1996), “Focus groups as alternative research practice”, Area
28 (2), pp. 115-23
Gremler, D.D, Brown, S.W (1997), “Service loyalty: its nature, importance, and
implications. Advancing service quality: a global perspective”, in Edvardsson (Eds),Quiz
5 Conference Processing, University of Karlstad, Sweden, pp.171-81
Gronroos, C. (1982), “Strategic Management and Marketing in the Service Sector”,
Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.
Gronroos, C. (1983), “Strategic Management and Marketing in the Service Sector”,
Report No. 83-104, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
Gronroos, C. (1983), “Strategic Management and Marketing in the Service Sector”,
Sweden and Chartwell-Bratt: Bromley Student Litteratu ab Lund
Gronroos, C. (1984), “A service quality model and its marketing implications”, European
Journal of Marketing, 18, 36-44
Gronroos, C. (1994), “From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing: Towards a
Paradigm Shift in Marketing”, Management Decision, 32 (2), pp. 4-20
Gronroos, C. (2001), Service Management and Marketing, 2nd edition, Chichester: John
Wiley & Sons Ltd
Gummesson, E. (1994), “Broadening and Specifying Relationship Marketing”. Asia-
Australia Marketing Journal, 2 (1), pp. 10-30.
Hallowell, R. (1996), “The relationships of customer satisfaction, customer loyalty and
profitability: an empirical study”, International Journal of Service Industry Management,
7(4), pp. 27-42
Hart, C.W., Heskett, J.L. and Sasser, W.E. (1990), “The profitable art of service
recovery”, Harvard Business Review, 68, pp 148-56
Heide, J. B. (1994), “Interorganizational governance in marketing channels”, Journal of
Marketing, 58(1), 71-85
87
Honey, M.A. (1987), “The interview as text: Hermeneutics considered as a model for
analysing the clinically informed research interview”, Human Development, 30, pp. 69-
82
Jacoby, J., & Kyner, D.B. (1973), “Brand loyalty versus repeat purchase behavior”,
Journal of Marketing Research, 10(1), 1-9
Johnston, R. and Fern, A. (1999), “Service recovery strategies for single and double
deviation scenarios”, The Service Industry Journal, 19(2), pp 69-82
Julander, C, Magi, A, Jonsson, J, Lindqvist, A (1997), “Linking customer satisfaction to
financial performance data”, in Edvardsson (Eds),Advancing Service Quality: A Global
Perspective”, Sweden: University of Karlstad
Kahn, R. and Cannell, C. (1957), “The Dynamics of Interviewing,” New York: John
Wiley
Chow, S., & Holden, R. (1997), “Toward an understanding of loyalty: The moderating
role of trust”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 275-298
Kandampully,J. and Suhartanto, D. (2000), “Customer loyalty in the hotel industry: the
role of customer satisfaction and image”, International Journal of Contemporary
Hospitality Management, 12(6), pp 346-51
Keaveney, S.M. (1995), “Customer switching behaviour in service industries: an
exploratory study”, Journal of Marketing, 58, pp 71-82
Kitzinger J. (1994), “The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction
between research participants”, Sociology of Health 16 (1), pp.103-21.
Kitzinger J. (1995), “Introducing focus groups”, British Medical Journal, 311, pp.
299-302.
Kreuger R.A. (1988), “Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research”, London:
Sage Publications
Lampton, B. (2003), “Paragon of Customer Service Excellence - The Ritz-Carlton Hotel
PART I”, available at http://www.expertmagazine.com/EMOnline/RC/part1.htm, last
accessed on September 4, 2006
Looy, B.V., Gemmel, P. and Dierdonck, R.V. (2003), “Services Management: An
integrated approach”, 2nd edition, Essex: Pearson Education Limited
Lufthansa Airlines, advertisement in the Wall Street Journal, march 9, 1987
88
MacIntosh J. (1981), “Focus groups in distance nursing education”, Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 18, pp. 1981-85
Macintosh, G., & Lockshin, L. S. (1997). “Retail relationships and loyalty: A multi-level
perspective”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(5), 487-497.
McAlexander, J.H, Kaldenberg, D.O. and Koenig, H.F (1994), “Service quality
measurement”, Journal of Health Care Marketing, 14(3), pp.34-40.
McDonald, L. (2002), “Customer Relationship Management - An Overvie”w, Available
at http://www.brillianceweb.com/betterwebdesign/tips_48.aspx, Accessed on July 30,
2006
Morgan D.L. (1988), “Focus groups as qualitative research”, London: Sage Publications
Morgan, R.M. and Shelby D. H. (1994), “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship
Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, 58, pp. 20-38
Neitzschman, L.H. & Neitzschman, H.R.(2002), “The Semi-Structured Conversation”
Normann, R.(1991), “Service Management Strategy and Leadership in Service
Businesses”, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Oliver, R.L. (1997), “Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer”,
Singapore: McGraw Hill
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1985), “A conceptual model of service
quality and its implications for future research”, Journal of Marketing, 49, pp. 41-50
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1988), “SERVQUAL: A multiple-item
scale for measuring consumers‟ perceptions of service quality”, Journal of Retailing,
64(1), pp 22-37
Patlow, C.G. (1993), How Ritz-Carlton applies “TQM”, The Cornell H.R.A. Quarterly,
pp 16-24
Piaget, J. (1926), [El método clínico] Introduction to La representation du monde chez
l'enfant. Paris: PUF. Span. trans. in J. Delval (Ed.) Lecturas de psicología del niño. Vol. I.
Madrid: Alianza, 1978, pp. 231-264.
Piaget, J. (1947), New Preface to third ed. of Le jugement et le raisonnement chez
l'enfant. Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestlé. Spa. trans.: El juicio y el razonamiento en el
niño. Buenos Aires: Guadalupe, 1972
Powell R.A. and Single H.M. (1996), “Focus groups”, International Journal of Quality in
Health Care, 8 (5), pp. 499-504
89
Powell R.A., Single H.M., Lloyd K.R. (1996), “Focus groups in mental health research:
enhancing the validity of user and provider questionnaires”, International Journal of
Social Psychology 42 (3), pp. 193-206.
Race K.E., Hotch D.F., Parker T. (1994), “Rehabilitation program evaluation: use of
focus groups to empower clients”, Evaluation Review 18 (6), pp. 730-40.
Reicheld, F.F. and Sasser, W.E. Jr (1990), “Zero defections comes to services”, Harvard
BusinessReview, September-October, pp. 105-11.
Reinartz, W. J.. & Kumar, V. (2003), “The impact of customer relationship
characteristics on profitable lifetime duration”, Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 77-99.
Richins, M. (1983), “Negative Word-of- mouth by dissatisfied customers: a pilot study”,
Journal of Marketing, 68, pp 105-11
Rowley, J., & Dawes, J. (2000), “ Disloyalty: A closer look at non-loyals”, Journal of
Consumer Marketing. 17(6), 538-549.
Ruyter, K. and Wetzels, M. (2000), “Customer equity considerations in service recovery:
A cross-industry perspective”, International Journal of Service Industry Management,
11(1), pp 91-108
Schneider, B., & Bowen, D. E. (1999), “Understanding customer delight and outrage”,
Sloan Management Review, 41, pp. 35-46
Selnes, F (1993), “An examination of the effect of product performance on brand
reputation, satisfaction and loyalty”, European Journal of Marketing, 27(9), pp.19-35.
Sheth, N. J., & Parvatiyar, A. (1995), “Relationships marketing in consumer markets:
Antecedents and consequences”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 255-
27
Silverman, D. (2000), “Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook”, London:
Sage Publications
Smith, A.K. and Bolton, R.N. (1998), “An experimental investigation of customer
reactions to service failure and recovery encounters”, Journal of Service Research, 1(1),
pp 65-81
Spreng, R.A., Harrell, R.A. and Mackoy, G.D. (1995), “Service recovery: impact on
satisfaction and intentions”, Journal of Services Marketing, 9(1), pp 15-23
Stake, R. E. (1995), “The Art of Case Study Research”, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications
90
Sugandhi, R.K. (2002), “Customer Relationship Management”, New Delhi: New age
International Publishers
Tax, S.S., Brown, S.W. and Chandrasekharan, M. (1998), “Customer evaluations of
service complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing”, Journal of
Marketing, 62, pp 60-76
Tax, S.S. and Brown, S.W.( 2000), “Service recovery: Research insights and practices”,
In Swartz, T.A. and Lacobucci, D. (eds), Handbook in Services Marketing and
Management, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Turiel, E. (1983), “The development of social knowledge”, Cambridge: Univ. Press.
Vargas, M. (2006), “The value of privacy”, available at
http://retailindustry.about.com/od/crm_privacy/a/loyalty2privacy.htm, last accessed on
August 10, 2006
Vinh-Bang (1966), “La méthode clinique et la recherche en psychologie de l?enfant.
Span. Trans”, in J Ajuriaguerra et al.: Psicología y epistemología genética: Buenos
Aires: Proteo, 1970, pp. 39-51
Wilson. J.R. (1991), “Word of mouth marketing”, USA: John Wiley & Sons, INC.
Yi, Y. (1990), “A critical review of consumer satisfaction”, in Zeithaml, V. (Ed.), Review
of Marketing, 1990, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 68-123.
Yin, R. (1993), “Applications of case study research”, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Publishing
Yin, R. (1994), “Case study research: Design and methods”, 2nd ed., Beverly Hills, CA:
Sage Publishing
Yin, R. K. (2002), “Case Study Research, Design and Methods”, 3rd ed. Newbury Park:
Sage Publications
Zeithaml, V. A., & Binter, M.J. (1996), “Service Marketing”, New York: The McGraw-
Hill Companies, INC.
www.interliner.nl
www.microsoft.com, [last accessed on August 25, 2006]
www.incredibleindia.org , [last accessed on September 5, 2006]
http://en.wikipedia.org, [last accessed on September 6, 2006]
91
Anonymous, “Research variables: Reliability and Validity of Measurement”, available on
http://cbdd.wsu.edu/edev/NetTOM_ToT/Resources/Other/TOM614/page68.htm, [last
accessed on September 3, 2006]
Ritz-Carlton Fact sheet, available at
http://www.ritzcarlton.com/corporate/about_us/fact_sheet.asp, last accessed on
September 2, 2006)
The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C. A Legacy of Service and Innovation, available
at http://www.ritzcarlton.com/corporate/about_us/history.asp, [last accessed on
September 6, 2006]
Ritz-Carlton Awards information, available at
http://www.ritzcarlton.com/corporate/about_us/awards.asp, [last accessed on September
7, 2006]
Ritz-Carlton Gold standards information, available at
http://www.ritzcarlton.com/corporate/about_us/gold_standards.asp, [last accessed on
September 5, 2006]
Ritz-Carlton Quality Philosophy information, available at
http://www.ritzcarlton.com/corporate/about_us/quality_philosophy/default.asp, [last
accessed on September 4, 2006]
Ritz-Carlton Upcoming locations information, available at
http://www.ritzcarlton.com/corporate/about_us/upcoming_locations.asp, [last accessed
on September 2, 2006]
92
Appendices
Appendix 1 Consent Form
Title of Study: The Dark Side of Customer Relationship Management in the luxury
segment of the Hotel Industry.
Principal Investigator: Mr. Akshay Jaipuria
Before agreeing to participate in this research study, it is important that you read the following:
Purpose of the study and how long it will last:
The purpose of this interview is to understand the dark side of CRM in the hotel industry.
It will take approximately 45 minutes to complete the interview.
Description of the study including the procedures to be used:
You will be asked about the service delivery of Ritz-Carlton and hotel industry at large
and the gaps that might occur is service delivery.
Description of procedures/elements that may result in discomfort or inconvenience:
There are no foreseeable physical or psychological risks when you participate in the
interview.
Confidentiality of research records:
A notebook will be used to record your answers. Your answers to the interview will be
kept confidential. Only the researcher will have access to the data. No attempt will be
made to identify you individually.
There is a possibility that data from this survey could be used for further research beyond
the initial study.
Withdrawal from Study
You are free to withdraw your consent and discontinue participation in the study at any
time without consequences.
93
Payment for participation in the research:
Participants in this study shall receive a drink and some snacks for participating in the
interview (Customers ONLY)
RESEARCH SUBJECTS‟ RIGHTS: I have read or have had read to me all of the
above.
Signature ___________________________________
94
Appendix 2 CRM and „Atithi Devo Bhava‟
India is renowned for its strong culture, warmth and friendly attitude. Respect has always
been an integral part of the Indian soul. From time immemorial we have always respected
our teachers, our elders, our parents and our guests. Perhaps that is why a great Indian
Emperor once observed that, “In Hindustan our manner is very respectful and our hearts
are always open.” In many ways, at that time India was the ultimate destination for the
enlightened travelers and Indian hospitality set the standards for the world. Indians
believe in „Atithi Devo Bhava”, which means that a guest is a form of God.
The Ministry of Tourism, Government of India, has introduced the “Atithi Devo Bhavah
Program” which is a seven point program of hospitality and training (Incredible India,
2006). The seven points are explained below.
1. “Samvedan Sheelta” or Sesitisation-
This means to sensitize the various sections of the tourism industry about how each of
them could contribute for the growth of the tourism industry and how they will benefit
from it.
2. Prashikshan or Training and Induction –
This involves explaining the needs and expectation of the tourist to employees, how they
should respond and behave in order to satisfy the needs and meet the expectations of the
guests.
95
3. Prerna or Motivation -
This means motivation to participate in this program through various measures like
awards for the best worker in the segment because when you are enthusiastic you can do
wonders.
4. Pramani Karan or Certification -
Certification to ensure standards shall be done at an appropriate stage in the training
program.
5. Pratipushti or Feedback -
Feedback shall be obtained from tourists about the service reception and their overall
experience to improve the training program on a continuous basis.
6. Samanya Bodh or General Awareness -
The marketing communication campaign will be undertaken to create general awareness
among the public about the necessity and the benefits of the Atithi Devo Bhavah
programme.
7. Swamitwa or Ownership-
The Atithi Devo Bhavah programme is a movement that shall urge all segments of the
Indian society and worldwide to adopt, and look upon as their own.
The concept of “Atithi Devo Bhavah” can be a helpful guide to CRM in the hotel
industry.
96
Appendix 3
The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company currently has 59 hotels under its flagship. A list of the
current locations is alphabetically given below:
1. Amelia Island, Fla.
2. Atlanta (Downtown), Ga .
3. Bali, Indonesia
4. Bachelor Gulch, Colo.
5. Bahrain
6. Hotel Arts Barcelona, Spain
7. Berlin
8. Boston, Mass.
9. Boston Common, Boston, Mass.
10. Buckhead (uptown Atlanta, Ga.)
11. Cancun, Mexico
12. Cleveland, Ohio
13. Coconut Grove (Miami), Fla.
14. Dearborn, Mich.
15. Doha, Qatar
16. Dubai, United Arab Emirates
17. Georgetown, Washington D.C.
18. Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands
19. Half Moon Bay, Calif.
20. Hong Kong
21. Huntington (Pasadena), Calif.
22. Istanbul, Turkey
23. Jakarta, Indonesia
24. Rose Hall, Jamaica
25. Kapalua (Maui), Hawaii
97
26. Key Biscayne (Miami), Fla.
27. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
28. Laguna Niguel, Calif.
29. Lake Las Vegas, Nev.
30. Marina del Rey, Calif.
31. Milan, Italy, BVLGARI Hotels and Resorts
32. Montreal, Quebec, Canada
33. Naples, Fla.
34. Naples Golf Resort, Fla.
35. New Orleans, La.
36. New York, Battery Park
37. New York, Central Park
38. Orlando Grande Lakes, Fla.
39. Osaka, Japan
40. Palm Beach, Fla.
41. Pentagon City, Va.
42. Penha Longa, Portugal
43. Philadelphia, Pa.
44. Phoenix, Ariz.
45. Reynolds Plantation, Ga.
46. South Beach (Miami), Fla.
47. St. Louis, Missouri
48. St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands
49. San Francisco, Calif.
50. San Juan, Puerto Rico
51. Santiago, Chile
52. Sarasota, Fla.
53. Seoul, Korea
54. Shanghai, China
55. Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt
56. Singapore
98
57. Tysons Corner, Va.
58. Washington, D.C.
59. Wolfsburg, Germany
There are also a few upcoming properties in various locations which are listed below
along with estimated year of opening.
UPCOMING LOCATIONS:
BVLGARI – Bali, Indonesia - 2006
Beijing Financial Center, China - 2006
Moscow, Russia - 2006
Powerscourt, County Wicklow, Ireland - 2007
Beijing, China (Central Place) - 2007
Dallas, Texas - 2007
Guangzhou, China - 2007
Tokyo, Japan - 2007
Molasses Reef, Turks & Caicos - 2007
Shenzhen, China - 2007
Charlotte, NC - 2008
Dubai Financial Centre, United Arab Emirates - 2008
Hong Kong, China - 2009
Toronto, Canada - 2009
(Ritz-Carlton, 2006)
99
Appendix 4
The following is a list of awards won by the Ritz-Carlton recently in 2005 and 2006:
Mobil Five-Star Award 2006
Lodgings
The Ritz-Carlton New York, Central Park
The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco
The Ritz-Carlton, Naples
The Ritz-Carlton, Palm Beach
Restaurants
The Dining Room at The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead
The Dining Room at The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco
Mobil Four-Star Award 2006
Lodgings
The Ritz-Carlton, Atlanta
The Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch
The Ritz-Carlton, Boston
The Ritz-Carlton, Boston Common
The Ritz-Carlton, Cleveland
The Ritz-Carlton, Coconut Grove
The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown
The Ritz-Carlton, Half Moon Bay
The Ritz-Carlton, Huntington Hotel & Spa
The Ritz-Carlton, Kapalua
100
The Ritz-Carlton, Key Biscayne
The Ritz-Carlton, Laguna Niguel
The Ritz-Carlton, Lake Las Vegas
The Ritz-Carlton, Golf Resort, Naples
The Ritz-Carlton, New York, Battery Park
The Ritz-Carlton Orlando, Grand Lakes
The Ritz-Carlton, Pentagon City
The Ritz-Carlton, Phoenix
The Ritz-Carlton, Reynolds Plantation
The Ritz-Carlton, Sarasota
The Ritz-Carlton, South Beach
The Ritz-Carlton, St. Louis
The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner
The Ritz-Carlton, Washington D.C.
Restaurants
The Dining Room at The Ritz-Carlton New York, Central Park
The Dining Room at The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner
AAA Five Diamond Award 2006
Lodgings
The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island
The Ritz-Carlton, Atlanta
The Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch
The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead
The Ritz-Carlton, Cancun
The Ritz-Carlton, Coconut Grove
The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown
The Ritz-Carlton Golf & Spa Resort, Rose Hall, Jamaica
101
The Ritz-Carlton, Half Moon Bay
The Ritz-Carlton, Huntington Hotel & Spa
The Ritz-Carlton, Kapalua
The Ritz-Carlton, Key Biscayne
The Ritz-Carlton, Laguna Niguel
The Ritz-Carlton, Lake Las Vegas
The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey
The Ritz-Carlton, Naples
The Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort, Naples
The Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park
The Ritz-Carlton New York, Central Park
The Ritz-Carlton, Palm Beach
The Ritz-Carlton, Philadelphia
The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco
The Ritz-Carlton, Sarasota
The Ritz-Carlton, Washington D.C.
Restaurants
The Dining Room at The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco
The Grill Room at The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island
Artisans in The Dining Room at The Ritz-Carlton, Naples
The Dining Room at The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead
Atelier at The Ritz-Carlton New York, Central Park
Maestro at The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner
The Club Grill at The Ritz-Carlton, Cancun
Fantino at The Ritz-Carlton, Cancun
102
Condé Nast Traveler: 2005 Gold List
United States
The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island
The Ritz-Carlton, Atlanta
The Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch
The Ritz-Carlton, Boston
The Ritz-Carlton, Boston Common
The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead
The Ritz-Carlton, Cleveland
The Ritz-Carlton, Coconut Grove
The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown
The Ritz-Carlton, Half Moon Bay
The Ritz-Carlton, Huntington Hotel & Spa
The Ritz-Carlton, Kapalua
The Ritz-Carlton, Key Biscayne
The Ritz-Carlton, Laguna Niguel
The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey
The Ritz-Carlton, Naples
The Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort, Naples
The Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park
The Ritz-Carlton New York, Central Park
The Ritz-Carlton, New Orleans
The Ritz-Carlton, Palm Beach
The Ritz-Carlton, Philadelphia
The Ritz-Carlton Lodge, Reynolds Plantation
The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco
The Ritz-Carlton, Sarasota
The Ritz-Carlton, Washington D.C.
103
Europe
Hotel Arts Barcelona
The Ritz-Carlton, Istanbul
Asia/Australia/Pacific Nations
The Ritz-Carlton, Bali Resort & Spa
The Ritz-Carlton, Hong Kong
The Ritz-Carlton, Osaka
The Ritz-Carlton, Millenia Singapore
The Portman Ritz-Carlton, Shanghai
The Americas
The Ritz-Carlton, Cancun
The Ritz-Carlton, Montreal
The Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Spa & Casino, San Juan
The Ritz-Carlton, Santiago
The Ritz-Carlton Golf & Spa Resort, Rose Hall, Jamaica
The Best by Design
No. 1 in the Americas: The Ritz-Carlton, Santiago
The Best by Activities
No. 1 in Asia, Australia and Pacific Nations: The Ritz-Carlton, Bali Resort & Spa
104
Travel + Leisure: 500 Greatest Hotels in the World 2006
United States
The Ritz-Carlton, Laguna Niguel
The Ritz-Carlton, Huntington
The Ritz-Carlton, Half Moon Bay
The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco
The Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch
The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown
The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island
The Ritz-Carlton, Naples
The Ritz-Carlton, Naples Golf Resort
The Ritz-Carlton Grande Lakes, Orlando
The Ritz-Carlton, Palm Beach
The Ritz-Carlton, Sarasota
The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead
The Ritz-Carlton, Kapalua
The Ritz-Carlton, New Orleans
Maison Orleans
The Ritz-Carlton, Boston
The Ritz-Carlton, Boston Common
The Ritz-Carlton, Lake Las Vegas
The Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park
The Ritz-Carlton New York, Central Park
The Ritz-Carlton, Cleveland
Europe
The Ritz-Carlton, Berlin
Hotel Arts
105
Asia
The Ritz-Carlton, Hong Kong
The Portman Ritz-Carlton, Shanghai
The Ritz-Carlton, Bali Resort & Spa
The Ritz-Carlton, Osaka
The Ritz-Carlton Millennia, Singapore
Mexico
The Ritz-Carlton, Cancun
South America
The Ritz-Carlton, Santiago
Caribbean
The Ritz-Carlton Golf & Spa Resort, Rose Hall, Jamaica
The Ritz-Carlton, St Thomas
Consumer Reports
Consumer Reports Hotels issue ranked The Ritz Carlton Hotel Company the No. 1
luxury hotel company in all areas including value, service, upkeep and problem
resolution.
Luxury Institute
Most Prestigious Luxury Brand
106
Travel Weekly
2006 Readers Choice Awards, Best Luxury Hotel Company
2006 Readers Choice Awards, Best Upscale Hotel Company
Forbes: Sure to Impress Travel Destinations
Forbes named The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company the best Business Hotel Chain
(Ritz-Carlton, 2006)
107
Appendix 5
108
109
110
111
112