Embed
Email

trademarks

Document Sample
trademarks
Shared by: HC11111116211
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
4
posted:
11/11/2011
language:
English
pages:
71
ORIGIN OF TRADEMARK



THE CONCEPT OF IDENTIFYING SOURCE OF MANUFACTURE BY

A MARK



ITS IMPORTANCE WAS RECOGNISED ONLY AFTER INDUSTRIAL

REVOLUTION



LARGE COMPANIES MANUFACTURING VARIOUS PRODUCTS BY

ITSELF OR THROUGH OTHERS AND MARKETED BY IT LEAD TO

USE OF ITS OWN TRADEMARK.



BY EXTENSIVE USE AND ADVERTISEMENT TRADEMARK

BECOMES POPULAR AND ACQUIRES GOODWILL.

COMPETITION LEAD TO PIRACY/DUPLICATION.



TO PROTECT THE GOODWILL OF A TRADER/MANUFACTURER

TRADEMARK LAWS ARE TO BE ENACTED.



IN INDIA AT PRESENT TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 AND TRADE

RULES 2002 ARE IN VOGUE.



THE FIRST TRADEMARK REGISTERED IN U.K UNDER NO.1 OF

1876 IN RESPECT OF READ EQUILATERAL TRIANGLE IN

RESPECT OF ALCOHOLIC.

WHAT IS TRADEMARK?

A TRADEMARK MUST BE A MARK WHICH INCLUDES:



A DEVICE - PEPSI / MYSORE SANDAL SOAP

BRAND - LIFE BOY / BPL



HEADING - WINDOWS

LABEL - PEPSI / COCA COLA









NAME - TATA / BIRLA / GODREJ

SIGNATURE -





WORD - INFOSYS / JAVA / MICROSOFT









LETTER - MTR



NUMERICAL - 555



SHAPE OF GOODS, PACKAGE OR COMBINATION OF COLOURS.

PROPERTY IN TRADEMARK



RIGHT ACQUIRED IN A TRADEMARK MERELY BY USING IT



ON REGISTRATION UNDER ACT, THE OWNERS RIGHT GET

CRYSTALLIZED AND HE WILL BE CALLED REGISTERED

PROPRIETOR.



REGISTRATION IS NOT MANDATORY.



IT IS ADVISABLE TO REGISTER A TRADEMARK TO PREVENT

PIRACY/DUPLICATION AND INNOCENT ADOPTION BY ANOTHER

PERSON.

WHAT MARKS ARE REGISTERABLE.



(I) CAPABLE BY BEING REPRESENTED GRAPHICALLY.



(II) CAPABLE OF DISTINGUISHING THE GOODS AND SERVICES

OF ONE PERSON FROM TO THOSE OF OTHERS.

NOT ENTITLE FOR REGISTRATION



 NOT ORIGINAL



 COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITED IN INDIA OR OTHER

CONVENTIONAL COUNTRY



 NOT DISTINCTIVE



 NOT CAPABLE OF DISTINGUISHABLE FROM OTHER

REGISTERED LAYOUT DESIGN

REFUSAL OF REGISTRATION:



 NOT CAPABLE OF DISTINGUISHING



 WHICH INDICATES QUALITY OR DESCRIPTIVE CHARACTER

OF GOODS.



 GENERIC NAMES OR MARKS COMMON TO TRADE.

NOT REGISTRABLE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES:



 MARK DECEIVES PUBLIC



 MARK LIKELY TO HURT RELIGIOUS FEELING.



 SCANDALOUS OBSCENE MATTER.



 PROHIBITED UNDER EMBLEMS AND NAMES ACT.-

MAHATMA/BALAJI/VIVEKANANDA/EMBLEM OF

REDCROSS/OLYMPICS ETC.



 SHAPE OF GOODS PURELY FUNCTIONAL.



 CHEMICAL NAMES AND INTERNATIONAL NON-PROPRIETARY

NAMES.

PROCEDURE



 AN APPLICATION WITH FEE

 SIGNED BY AGENT OR APPLICANT HIMSELF

 REPRESENTATION OF MARK APPLIED EITHER IN USE OR

PROPOSED TO BE USED.

 BEFORE APPLYING IT IS ALWAYS BETTER TO CARRYOUT

SEARCH IN TRADEMARK REGISTRY, PUBLICATION AND

MARKET.

 AFTER APPLICATION IS FILED, EXAMINATION OF MARK AND

EXAMINERS REPORT IS FURNISHED.

 AFTER COMPLYING WITH OBJECTIONS THE MARK WILL BE

ACCEPTED AND ADVERTISED IN THE TRADEMARK JOURNAL.

 IF NO OPPOSITIONS ARE FILED WITHIN THREE MONTHS, THE

MARK WILL BE REGISTERED.

 RENEWAL HAS TO BE DONE ONCE IN SEVEN YEARS ON

PAYMENT OF REQUISITE FEE.

ASSIGNMENT OF TRANSMISSION



 A REGISTERED TRADEMARK CAN BE ASSIGNED AND THE

SAME HAS TO BE DULY REGISTERED WITH THE REGISTRY.



 AN UNREGISTERED TRADEMARK CAN BE ASSIGNED ONLY

WITH GOODWILL OF THE BUSINESS.



 A PERMITTED USE OF TRADEMARK CAN BE GRANTED

UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS.



 LICENCE CAN BE GRANTED FOR USE OF UNREGISTERED

TRADEMARK.

RECTIFICATION



 THE REGISTER SUFFERS FROM THE ABSENCE OR OMISSION

VIZ., DISCLAIMER, A CONDITION OR LIMITATION.



 ENTRY MADE WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE.



 ENTRY WRONGLY REMAINING IN THE REGISTER.



 MARK NOT IN USE FOR MORE THAN 5 YEARS.



 NON-PAYMENT OF RENEWAL FEE.

THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT- CERTAIN LIMITATION



 IF REGISTRATION IS NOT VALID

 IF TRADEMARK USED VIOLATING CONDITIONS AND

LIMITATIONS ATTACHED AT THE TIME OF REGISTRATION.

 REGISTRATION WILL NOT OPERATE AGAINST ANOTHER

REGISTERED PROPRIETORS OF IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR

TRADEMARKS.

 REGISTERED PROPRIETOR CANNOT INTERFERE WITH PRIOR

USER OF THE SAME OR SIMILAR MARK.

 BONAFIDE USE OF HIS OWN NAME OR THAT OF HIS PLACE

OF HIS BUSINESS OR THE USE OF ANY BONAFIDE

CHARACTER OR QUALITY OF GOODS.

 IF IN THE COURSE OF TIME IT BECOMES THE NAME OF AN

ARTICLE OR SUBSTANCE, THEN THE RIGHTS CONFERRED

CEASES.

 REGISTRATION IS NOT DEFENCE AGAINST PASSING-OFF.

INFRINGEMENT OF TRADEMARK

THE FOLLOWING USER OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK WHICH

ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE CONFUSION CONSTITUTE

INFRINGEMENT



 MARKS IDENTICAL AND GOODS AND SERVICES ARE SIMILAR

 MARKS SIMILAR AND GOODS AND SERVICES SIMILAR

 MARKS IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR, THE GOODS AND SERVICES

ARE NOT SIMILAR

 THE REGISTERED PROPRIETOR HAS REPUTATION IN INDIA

 DETRIMENTAL TO THE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OR REPUTE

OF THE REGISTERED TRADEMARK

 USE OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK AS PART OF TRADENAME

OR PART OF TRADEMARK OR NAME OF BUSINESS

CONCERN.

FOLLOWING ACTS CONSTITUTE INFRINGEMENT



(1) AFFIXES REGISTERED TRADEMARK TO GOODS,

MANUFACTURERS



 OFFERS, EXPOSES, SALES, STOCKS, OR SUPPLIES GOODS

AND SERVICES UNDER REGISTERED TRADEMARK.



 IMPORT AND EXPORT



 USE OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON BUSINESS PAPERS

OR ADVERTISEMENT.

NOT CONSTITUTES INFRINGEMENT



 NOT TAKING UNFAIR ADVANTAGES OF OR CAUSE



 DETRIMENT TO DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER OR REPUTE OF

TRADEMARK.



 USE IN RELATION TO GOODS OR SERVICES INDICATING

CHARACTER, QUALITY OR GEOGRAPHICAL ORIGIN.

 THE OBJECT OF USE IS TO INDICATE THAT THE SERVICES

HAVE BEEN PERFORMED BY THE PROPRIETOR.

 CHANGE THE CONDITION OF GOODS.

Contd.

Contd.

 IF REGISTRATION IS CONFINED TO CERTAIN TERRITORIES,

USE OF TRADE BEYOND THOSE TERRITORIES DOES NOT

CONSTITUTE INFRINGEMENT, BUT AMOUNTS TO PASSING-OFF.



 SALE OF GOODS ON RETAIL BASIS AFTER PURCHASING THE

SAME IN BULK, EXCEPT REPACKING.



 SALE OF ACCESSORIES OF GOODS SUCH AS MACHINERY,

AUTHORITIES, CYCLES WHERE PARTS ARE MANUFACTURED

BY DIFFERENT PERSONS.



 IDENTICAL MARK REGISTERED BY MORE THAN ONE PERSON.

 SALE OF GOODS BY ASSIGNEE OF A TRADEMARK AS LONG

AS HE DOES NOT

ACTION FOR INFRINGEMENT



A SUIT CAN BE FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT HAVING

JURISDICTION.



A SUIT CAN BE FILED IN ADDITION TO DISTRICT JUDGE IN HIGH

COURT OF DELHI, MUMBAI, CALCUTTA AND CHENNAI WHICH

HAVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.

RELIEFS:-



(1) MANDATORY INJUNCTION RESTRAINING DEFENDANTS

FROM USING TRADEMARK



(I) DAMAGES AND COSTS

(II) SUITS FOR ACCOUNTS

(III) SURRENDER OF INFRINGED GOODS.

(IV) SURRENDER OF LABELS, BILLS, HOARDINGS, LETTER

HEADS, TRANSPERENCIES, NEGATIVES, POSITIVES,

PAMPHLETS, BROUCHERS, ETC.,



AN INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION CAN ALSO BE FILED FOR

INTERIM INJUNCTION.

EVIDENCE/PROOF



CERTIFIED COPY OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK CERTIFICATE.



BILLS, INVOICES, ST AND IT ASSESSMENT ORDERS



ADVERTISEMENTS



AUDITED BALANCE SHEETS



PACKAGES, BOXES ETC.,



PHOTOGRAPHS

DEFENDANTS DOCUMENTS/PROOF



 PHOTOGRAPHS



 BILLS AND INVOICES



 PRODUCT



 PACKAGES, PAMPHLETS



 ADVERTISEMENTS



 AFFIDAVIT OF PERSONS WHO HAVE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT

INFRINGEMENT.

PASSING-OFF



IN RESPECT OF UNREGISTERED TRADEMARK, ACTION FOR

PASSING OFF CAN BE INTIATED.

ESSENTIAL CHARACTERS:



 MISREPRESENTATION MADE BY A PERSON DURING THE

COURSE OF TRADE



 TO PROSPECTIVE CUSTOMERS.



 CALCULATED INJURE OR LOSS TO THE GOODWILL AND

BUSINESS OF A TRADER.



 DAMAGE OR LIKELIHOOD OF DAMAGE IS ESSENTIAL

METHODS WHICH CONSTITUTES PASSING-OFF



 FALSE REPRESENTATION

 ADOPTION OF TRADEMARK WHICH IS THE SAME OR A

COLOURABLE IMITATION OF A TRADEMARK

 ADOPTION OF ESSENTIAL CHARACTER OF A TRADEMARK

 COPYING GET UP OR COLOUR SCHEME.

 IMITATING THE DESIGN OR SHAPE OF GOODS

 ADOPTING THE WORD OR NAME OF RIVAL TRADER.



AGAINST INTERLOCUTORY ORDER APPEAL LIES TO HIGH

COURT AND THEREAFTER TO SUPREME COURT.



AGAIN FINAL ORDER APPEAL LIES TO HIGH COURT AND

THEREAFTER TO SUPREME COURT.

OFFENCES & PENALTIES



FOR INFRINGEMENT OF TRADEMARK CRIMINAL ACTION

CAN ALSO BE INITIATED EITHER BY FILING FIR BEFORE

POLICE OR BY FILING PRIVATE COMPLAINT BEFORE

MAGISTRATE.

GROUNDLESS THREATS



PERSON AGGRIEVED OF GROUNDLESS THREATS CAN ALSO

INITIATE ACTION AGAINST PERSON WHO IS MAKING THREATS.



THE SEMI-CONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS LAYOUT DESIGN

BILL 2000



THE BILL IS DESIGNED TO GIVE STATUTORY PROTECTION TO

INTEGRATED CIRCUITS LAYOUT FOR A PERIOD OF TEN YEARS

SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS.

CASE LAWS OF TRADEMARK:



EASTMAN VS. JOHN GRIFFTHS (1898) 15 RPC 105



KODAK FOR CAMERAS BY PLAINTIFF

KODAK FOR BICYLES BY DEFENDANTS



INJUNCTION GRANTED SINCE PLAINTIFFS HAS SOLD CAMERAS

WHICH CAN BE FITTED TO BICYLES

DUNLOP PNEUMATIC VS. DUNLOP LUBRICANT (1899) 16 RPC 12



PLAINTIFFS USED DUNLOP FOR TYRES FOR BICYLES.



DEFENDANTS STARTED USING DUNLOP FOR OILS AND

LUBRICANTS FOR BICYLES, INJUNCTION GRANTED

RESTRAINING DEFENDANTS FROM USING THE TRADE MARK

DUNLOP

COMPUTER VISION CORPORATION VS. COMPUTER VISION LTD.

(1975) RPC 17



PLAINTIFFS USED TRADEMARK FOR MANUFACTURE OF

COMPUTERS AND OTHER SOPHISTICATED ELECTRONIC

SYSTEMS SINCE 1966



DEFENDANTS ADOPTED SIMILAR NAME IN 1973 FOR SELLING

ELECTRONIC CHECKOUT SYSTEM FOR SUPER MARKET.

INJUNCTION GRANTED FOR COMMON FIELD OF ACTIVITY

KAMAL TRADING VS. GILLETTE (1988 IPL 135)



7' O CLOCK FOR BLADES USED FOR SHAVING BLADES FOR

MANY YEARS DISCONTINUED SINCE 1958 FOR IMPORT BAN.



DEFENDANT USED 7'O CLOCK FOR TOOTH BRUSH SINCE 1982.



INJUNCTION GRANTED ON ACCOUNT OF REPUTATION AND THE

CONDUCT OF DEFENDANT WAS DISHONEST AND FRAUDULENT

A.B.VOLVO VS. VOLVO STEELS LTD., 1998 PTC 47 (DEL) (DB)



PLAINTIFF A SWEDISH COMPANY MANUFACTURING VOLVO

AUTOMOBILES.



VOLVO IS LATIN WORD NOT KNOWN IN INDIA.



SWEEDISH COMPANY IS REGISTERED PROPRIETOR OF

TRADEMARK VOLVO IN INDIA.



DEFENDANT STARTED USING VOLVO AND 'VOLVO GROUP' AS A

PART OF THEIR TRADING STYLE.



INJUNCTION GRANTED FOR DISHONEST ADOPTION.

DONGRE VS. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATON (1996) PTC 583 SC



WHIRLPOOL ADOPTED BY DEFENDANT FOR HOME

APPLIANCES/WASHING MACHINES ETC.,



WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION OBTAINED INJUNCTION

RESTRAINING DEFENDANT FROM USING TRADEMARK

WHIRLPOOL.



THE REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARK WHIRLPOOL OBTAINED BY

DEFENDANT WAS CANCELLED.



ADOPTION OF TRADEMARK WHIRLPOOL BY DEFENDANT IS

HELD TO BE DISHONEST AND FRAUDULENT



TRANSBORDER REPUTATION OF TRADEMARK DISCUSSED.

THE GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION OF GOODS (REGISTRATION

AND PROTECTION) ACT, 1999.



UNDER TRADEMARKS ACT, A GEOGRAPHICAL NAME, EXCEPT

UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES IS CONSIDERED NOT

DISTINCTIVE AND CAN BE REGISTERED ONLY AFTER PROVING

ITS DISTINCTIVENESS. THE ACT IS DESIGNED TO OVERCOME

THE ABOVE DAMNA/SHORTFALL FACED BY

TRADER/MANUFACTURERS.

WHAT IS GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION



AN INDICATION USED TO IDENTIFY THE GOODS, WHETHER

NATURAL OR MANUFACTURED GOODS EMANATING FROM A

PARTICULAR AREA OR TERRITORY KNOWN FOR PARTICULAR

QUALITY OR CHARACTERISTIC OF THE GOODS, SUCH

GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES IF USED BY A PERSON IN RELATION TO

GOODS ORIGINATING FROM ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PLACES IS

LIKELY TO CAUSE CONFUSION OR DECEPTION. THE ACT IS AIMED

TO GIVE STATUTORY PROTECTION TO CONSUMERS FROM SUCH

CONFUSION AND DECEPTION THROUGH PROCESS OF

REGISTRATION OF INDICATION BY LAW.



EG: BASUMATI RICE,CHAMPAGNE, COORG HONEY, COORG

COFFEE, NILGIRIS OIL, DARJEELING TEA, ETC., KANCHIPURAM

SAREE, MYSORE SILK ETC.,

THE PROTECTION OF PLANT VARIETIES AND FARMER'S RIGHTS

BILL, 1999.



THIS BILL IS IN CONFIRMITY WITH TRIPS AGREEMENT.



THE BILL IS AIMED TO GIVE PROTECTION TO RESEARCHERS IN

PLANTS OR ORGANISATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH RESEARCH

ON PLANT. THE BILLS ALSO AIMED TO ENCOURAGE AND TO

PROVIDE INCENTIVES FOR PRODUCING NEW PLANT VARIETIES

BY GRANTING THEM EITHER PATENT RIGHT OR SUI GENERIS

SYSTEM. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA HAS DECIDED TO ADOPT A

SUI GENERIS LEGISLATION TO PROTECT BREEDERS OF NEW

VARIETIES OF PLANTS.

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000



DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY HAVE BROUGHT OUT SIGNIFICANT

CHANGES IN OUR DAILY LIFE, PARTICULARLY IN THE FIELD OF

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.



EVENTHOUGH PEOPLE ARE AWARE OF ADVANTAGES OF USE

OF COMPUTER, THEY WERE RELUCTANT TO USE THE SAME ON

ACCOUNT IF FEAR THAT THEIR TRANSACTION WILL NOT STAND

TEST OF FINAL IN COURT OF LAW. THE TWO PRINCIPLE

HURDLES WHICH STAND IN THE WAY OF FACILITATING

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE

ARE THE REQUIREMENTS AS TO WRITING AND SIGNATURE FOR

LEGAL EVIDENCE.

Contd.

AT PRESENT, THE EVIDENCE ACT WHICH DEAL WITH EVIDENCES

IN COURTS ENACTED IN THE YEAR 1872 ONLY DEAL WITH

DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS BASED UPON PAPER AND ORAL

TESTIMONY. ACT IS DESIGNED TO GIVE STATUTORY

PROTECTION TRANSACTION ARISING OUT OF ELECTRONIC

COMMERCE AND ELECTRONIC BUSINESS.



THE ACT HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS MODEL LAW ADOPTED BY

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW.









Contd.

Contd.



THE ACT DEALS WITH AUTHENTICATION OF ELECTRONIC

RECORDS BY AFFIXING ONE’S DIGITAL SIGNATURE.



THE ACT ALSO PROVIDES FOR LEGAL RECOGNITION AND

ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND DIGITAL SIGNATURE.



IT PERMITS USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND DIGITAL

SIGNATURE IN GOVERNMENT AND ITS AGENCIES.



DOCUMENTS CAN BE RETAINED IN ELECTRONIC FORM.

THE FOLLOWING ACTS HAVE ALSO BEEN AMENDED.



 INDIAN PENAL CODE



 INDIAN EVIDENCES ACT



 BANKER'S BOOK EVIDENCE ACT



 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ACT

COPYRIGHT IS DERIVED FROM THE EXPRESSION "COPIES OF

WORDS" USED IN OXFORD DICTIONARY IN 1586.



THE WORD 'COPY' DATE BACK TO 1485 AND USED TO CANNOTE

A MANUSCRIPT FOR PRINTING.

COPYRIGHT MEANS THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO DO CERTAIN

ACTS IN RELATION TO DO CERTAIN ACTS IN RELATION TO:



 LITERARY, DRAMATIC OR MUSICAL WORKS



 ARTISTIC WORK



 CINEMOTOGRAPHIC FILM



 SOUND RECORDING

SCOPE OF COPYRIGHT



 NO COPYRIGHT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED UNDER

COPYRIGHT ACT.

 GIVES PROTECTION TO THE WRITER OR CREATOR OF THE

ORIGINAL WORK FROM UNAUTHORISED EXPLOITATION OR

REPRODUCTION.

 EXCLUSIVE RIGHT WITHOUT AUTHORITY.

 COPYRIGHT IS A MULTIPLE RIGHT CONSISTING OF BUNDLE

OF DIFFERENT RIGHTS IN THE SAME WORK.

 NO COPYRIGHT IN IDEALS SUBSISTS ONLY IN MATERIAL

FORM.

 COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ONLY IF THE AUTHOR HAS

BESTOWED UPON THE WORK SUFFICIENT JUDGEMENT,

SKILL, LABOUR OR CAPITAL.

 COPYRIGHT SUBSISTS ONLY IF ORIGINAL WORK.

 NO COPYRIGHT IS IMMORAL OR ILLEGAL WORK.

QUALIFICATION FOR COPYRIGHT SUBSISTANCE.



 FIRST PUBLICATION IN INDIA



 IF PUBLISHED OUTSIDE INDIA, AUTHOR MUST BE CITIZEN OF

INDIA.



 IF PUBLICATION AFTER THE DEATH OF THE AUTHOR, HE

MUST HAVE BEEN A CITIZEN OF INDIA.



 IF UNPUBLISHED WORK, THE AUTHOR MUST BE A INDIAN

CITIZEN AT TIME OF MAKING WORK.



 ARCHITECTURAL WORK OF ART, THE WORK IS LOCATED IN

INDIA.

LITERARY WORKS



INCLUDES



 TABLES



 COMPILATIONS



 COMPUTER IF RECORDED IN DISC, TAPES OR OTHER

INFORMATIVE STORAGE DEVICE



 ANY WORK EXPRESSED IN PRINT OR WRITING

DRAMATIC







A DRAMATIC WORK INCLUDES ANY PIECE OF REITATION,

CHOREOGRAPHIC WORK OR ENTERTAINMENT IN DUMB

SHOW, SCENIC ARRANGEMENT OR ACTING FORM OF WHICH

FIXED IN WRITING.

MUSICAL WORKS



 COMBINATION OF ANY MELODY AND HARMONY OR EITHER

OF THEM PRINTED, REDUCED TO WRITING OR OTHERWISE

GRAPHICALLY PRODUCED OR REPRODUCED



 IT MUST BE ORIGINAL TO QUALIFY FOR COPYRIGHT.



 NO COPYRIGHT IN A SONG



 IF MUSIC AND SONG IS OWNED BY SAME PERSON,

COPYRIGHT SUBSISTS.

ARTISTIC WORK



MEANS:



 PAINTING

 A SCULPTURE

 A DRAWING INCLUDING A DIAGRAM, MAP, CHART OR PLAN

 AN ENGRAVING

 A PHOTOGRAPH WHETHER ARTISTIC OR NOT

 AN ARCHITECTURAL WORK OF ART

 WORK OF A ARTISTIC CRAFTMENSHIP.

 CINEMOTOGRAPHIC FILMS.

TYPES OF OWNERSHIP IN COPYRIGHTS:



 SOFTWARE/MULTIMEDIA:



1. SOFTWARE ENGINEER

2. THE EMPLOYER

3. ANY LICENCEES OF THE EMPLOYER, EXCLUSIVE & NON-

EXCLUSIVE

4. OWNERS IN VARIOUS TERRITORIES



 MUSIC:



1. RIGHT OF LYRICIST

2. MUSIC DIRECTOR

3. SINGER

4. ORCHESTRA

5. MUSIC COMPANY

6. VERSION RECORDINGS

VARIOUS COPYRIGHTS:

1. RIGHTS OF PERFORMERS

2. RIGHTS OF PRODUCER

3. RIGHTS OF MUSIC DIRECTOR

4. RIGHTS IN TITLE SONG

5. RIGHTS OF THE BROADCASTER VIZ., ZEE TV



 BOOKS:

1. RIGHTS OF THE AUTHOR

2. RIGHTS OF THE PUBLISHER IN INDIA AND ABROAD

3. RIGHTS OF A PERSON PUBLISHING THE BOOK ON CD ROM

4. RIGHTS ON THE INTERNET



 MACHINERY

THIS CAN BE SUB-MATTER OF PATENT AND COPYRIGHT. BUT

DRAWINGS OF MACHINERY FALLS IN COPYRIGHT.

ESCORTS CONSTRUCTION CASE.

MEDICINES



1. REALM OF PATENTS

2. TRADEMARK RIGHTS IN COLOUR OF CAPSULES AND

GRANULES

3. NO COPYRIGHTS



PEPSI CAN



1. COPYRIGHT IN THE PACKAGING, COLOURS ETC.,

2. TRADEMARK IN PEPSI

3. COPYRIGHT IN CIRCULAR DEVICE

4. COPYRIGHT IN MANNER OF WRITING PEPSI

TO SECURE COPYRIGHT - IS IT ESSENTIAL TO SECURE

REGISTRATION



COPYRIGHT IS RIGHT WHICH COMES INTO EXISTENCE WHEN

THE WORK IS CREATED. NO REGISTRATION IS NECESSARY.

HOWEVER, EVEN IF PROTECTION EXISTS, IT IS ADVISABLE TO

GET REGISTRATION.

PROCEDURE FOR REGISTRATION OF COPYRIGHT



APPLICATION WITH FEE



5 COPIES OF THE COPYRIGHT WORK

ADVANTAGE OF REGISTRATION OF COPYRIGHT



 IT CONSTITUTES PRIMA-FACIE EVIDENCE OF COPYRIGHT

FIRST OWNER OF COPYRIGHT



THE AUTHOR OF WORK IS DEEMED TO BE THE FIRST OWNER

OF THE COPYRIGHT



HOWEVER, IN CASE OF A WORK MADE IN THE COURSE OF THE

EMPLOYMENT UNDER A CONTRACT OF SERVICE THE

EMPLOYER IS THE FIRST OWNER OF THE SAME.

TRANSER OF COPYRIGHT



LICENSING



ASSIGNMENT

MORAL RIGHTS :



 APART FROM COPYRIGHT LAW PROPER, THE AUTHOR HAS

TWO BASIC MORAL RIGHTS:



 RIGHTS OF PATERNITY



 RIGHT OF INTEGRITY

THE TERM OF COYRIGHT



 FOR LITERARY, DRAMATIC MUSICAL OR ARTISTIC WORK IS

LIFETIME OF AUTHOR + 60 YEARS



 FOR ANONYMOUS OR PSEUDONYMOUS WORK IS 60 YEARS

FROM THE DATE OF PUBLISHING



 FOR A PHOTOGRAPH, SOUND RECORDING,

CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILM AND GOVERNMENT WORK IS 60

YEARS FROM DE OF PUBLISHING OF THE WORK.

INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT



WHAT CONSTITUTES INFRINGEMENT?



DOING OR AUTHORIZING TO DO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ACTS

WITHOUT THE CONSENT OR LICENSE OF OWNER OF COPYRIGHT



 REPRODUCE THE WORK INCLUDING ITS STORAGE

 ISSUE COPIES TO THE PUBLIC

 PERFORM/COMMUNICATE THE WORK TO PUBLIC

 MAKE TRANSLATION OF THE WORK

 MAKE ADAPTION OF THE WORK

 PERMIT FOR PROFIT ANY PLACE TO BE USED FOR

COMMUNICATION OF THE WORK WHEN INFRINGEMENT

 MAKE INFRINGING COPIES OF WORK FOR SALE, HIRE OR

DISPLAY OR OFFER FOR SALE OR HIRE

 IMPORT INFRINGING COPIES IN INDIA.

CIVIL REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT INCLUDE



 INJUNCTION



 DAMAGES



 DELIVERY OF INFRINGING COPIES



 RENDITION OF ACCOUNTS

CRIMINAL REMEDIES



SECTION 63 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957 DEFINES OFFENCE

OF INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT.



INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IS A COGNIZABLE OFFENCE

PUNISHABLE WITH IMPRISONMENT UPTO 3 YEARS AND FINE

UPTO 2 LAKH RUPEES.

EXCEPTIONS - FAIR USE



SECTION 52 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT ENLISTS ACTS WHICH DO

NOT CONSTITUTE INFRINGMENT, VIZ.,



 FAIR DEALING FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRIVATE USE,

INCLUDING RESEARCH AND CRITICISM OR REVIEW OF THE

WORK

 FAIR DEALING FOR THE PURPOSE OF REPORTING CURRENT

EVENTS IN A NEWSPAER, ETC.,

 REPRODUCTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF JUDICIAL

 PROCEEDING OR REPORT OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDING

MAKING OF TEMPORARY OR BACK-UP COPIES TO PROVIDE

AGAINST DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE

 OBSERVATION, STUDY OR TESTING OF FUNCTIONING OF

THE COMPUTER PROGRAMME

 MAKING OF COPIES OF SOFTWARE FROM A LEGAL COPY

FOR NON-COMMERCIAL PERSONAL USE.

SOFTWARE AND BUSINESS METHODS



TRADITIONALLY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE IS PROTECTED UNDER

THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957. THE SOURCE CODE AND OBJECT

CODE ARE TREATED AS LITERARY WORKS AND COPYRIGHT

PROTECTION IS GRANTED.



UNDER THE PATENTS ACT, 1970, SOFTWARE AND BUSINESS

METHODS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY DEALT WITH. THE

SITUATION THEREFORE WAS THAT SOFTWARE WAS BEING

INDIRECTLY PATENTED SINCE THERE WAS NO BAR. HOWEVER,

THE PRACTICE WAS THAT SOFTWARE COUPLED WITH A

HARDWARE APPLICATION WAS BEING TREAED AS A

"PROCESS" & "INVENTION".

CASE LAWS FOR COPYRIGHT:



ANAND R G VS. M/S DELUXE FILMS AIR 1978 S C 1613



NO COPYRIGHT SUBSISTS IN:



 IDEA



 THEME



 SUBJECT MATTER



PLOTS OR HISTORICAL OR LEGENDARY FACTS AND VIOLATION

OF THE COPYRIGHT IN SUCH CASE IS CONFINED TO THE FORM,

MANNER, ARRANGEMENT AND EXPRESSING OF IDEA BY THE

AUTHOR

INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHTS SOCIETY LTD., VS. EASTERN

INDIA MOTION PICTURES ASSOCIATON AIR 1977 S C 1443



THE COMPOSER OF LYRIC OR MUSICAL WORK WHO HAS

AUTHORISED A PRODUCER TO USE HIS LYRIC CANNOT

RESTRAIN PRODUCER OF THE MOVIE FROM EXPLOITING THE

SAID LYRICS RECORDED ON A SOUND TRACK FOR

COMMERCIAL GAINS OR SCREENING TO THE PUBLIC

HARRINGTON CONSTRUCTION & FINANCE LTD., VS. EICHER

GONDMEARTH LTD., (1997 PTC 72) DB



IF THE AUTHOR UTILISES HIS OWN SKILL AND INTELLIGENCE

AND BRINGOUT HIS OWN AND INTELLIGENCE AND BRINGOUT

HIS OWN WORK, EVEN IF THE IDEA IS COPIED FROM SOMEONE

ELSE THE WORK IS ENTITLE TO COPYRIGHT PROTECTION.

IN THE FOLLOWING WORKS THE COURTS HAVE HELD THAT

COPYRIGHT SUBSISTS



 COMPILATION OF EXAMINATION PAPERS

 TAMBOLA TICKETS

 ABRIDGEMENT OF HEAD NOTE OR JUDGEMENTS

 COMPILATION OF ADDRESS USING COMPUTER, COMPUTER

PROGRAMME.



DOES NOT SUBSISTS



 IN WORDS

 SIMPLE DRAWING WHERE NO SKILL AND INTELLIGENCE IS

EMPLOYED

 WHILE IN EMPLOYMENT WITH AN EMPLOYEE

GRAMAPHONE INDIA VS. SUPER CASSETTE INDUSTRIES LTD.,

1996 PTC 252 (DEL)



COMBINATON OF MELODY AND/OR HARMONY UNLESS

REDUCED IN WRITING OR GRAPHICALLY PRODUCED OR

REPRODUCED IS NOT A MUSICAL WORK UNDER THE ACT

GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION:

Geographical Indication is used to identify agricultural, natural

or manufactured goods originated in any definite territory of

India which has a special quality or characteristic or reputation

based upon the climatic or production characteristic unique to

the Geographical Indication.



Examples: * Basmati Rice

* Darjeeling Tea

* Kancheepuram Silk

* Mysore Silk Saree

* Nagpur Orange

* Kollapuri Chappal

* Chennapatna Toys

* Mysore Sandal Soap

* Nanjangud Rasbale


Related docs
Other docs by HC11111116211
Jeopardy Grammar Review
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
2004
Views: 34  |  Downloads: 0
music
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
r614 007
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
HDFC 20Bank
Views: 509  |  Downloads: 0
Copy 20of 20CALOG PROMO MATIERE
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
act2000n
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
PIZZA 20WORKSHOP
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
materials Maincontent 0005 file
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ASCEhistory
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!