HSC TAFE LEGAL STUDIES POWER POINT by t4Ri061

VIEWS: 23 PAGES: 23

									  BANKSTOWN
COLLEGE OF TAFE

 HSC LEGAL STUDIES
  Teacher: Naz Osta

  E-Mail: nazosta@hotmail.com
HSC LEGAL STUDIES

Course Content                      Duration
•   Introduction to Legal Studies   •   2 weeks
•   Law and Justice                 •   4 weeks
•   Human Rights                    •   4 weeks
•   Crime                           •   10 weeks
•   Family Law                      •   5 weeks
•   World Order                     •   5 weeks

         TOTAL:
                                    30 Weeks
                 HSC ASSESSMENT CALANDER
Components       Task 1            Task 2     Task 3    Task 4      Task 5
and Weightings   23 feb            14 april   23 june   11 august   TBA


PC Exam          Introduction to
                 Legal Studies


Exam                               Law and
10 %                               Society

Assignment                                     Crime
25 %

Research                                                Family
Essay                                                   Law
25%
Trial HSC                                                           All
40%                                                                 Topics
TOTAL
100%
Introduction to Law
What is Law?

Rules that apply to everyone that can be enforced.

Where does our law com from?

Parliament, courts, the constitution and delegated legislation

Why do we need law? Is law necessary?

1. Laws regulate society by telling us what we can do and when.
2. Laws enforce values society deems important.
3. Laws protect members of the community from harm.
4. The law provides a venue for resolution in times of conflict between
    individuals.
5. Laws enforce rights and gains compensation.

What are the characteristics of law?

1. Laws can be enforced.
2. laws are accepted by the community.
3. Laws are binding on the community.
4. Laws are discoverable. ( no hidden laws, you can go out and find out about
    them).
5. Laws are in the public interest.
6. Laws reflect morality.
                         SOURCES OF LAW
1/ COMMON LAW: judge made law based on Doctrine of Precedent. The system of Law
       used in Britain and its colonies.

       PRECEDENT: A binding decision made on a present case based on a previous
       court case with similar facts.
•      Judges are bound by the ratio decidendi which is the reason for a judgement
•      Judges are not bound by the obiter dictum which is a subjective comment, more
       personal input.

2/ STATUTE LAW: also known as Legislation, or Acts of Parliament. Statute Law is made
       by Parliament. Eg. Native Title act (1993)


3/ DELEGATED LEGISLATION: laws made by subordinate authorities (eg: Australian Post-
       cost of Postage).
•      Advantages~ more effective, quicker, saves time by allowing persons of bodies
       with relevant expertise to make decisions about mundane matters etc.


4/ CONSTITUTION: describes how the country should be run and outlines how Power is
       divided and the rights it gives its citizens.
•      To bring together the 6 colonies in a federation (power sharing): Created a new
       level of govt, the Commonwealth and set out rules for the relation between this
       new level (federal) and the states (former colonies).

5/ INTERNATIONAL LAW: governs the interactions between nations. If a nation breaches
        international law, it can be dealt with by the international community through:
        Trade Embargoes, Denial of Diplomatic Recognition, Trade Sanctions and Military
        Action.
•       THE UNITED NATIONS: acts as a global security and development organisations.
        The UN maintains global peace and security. [The General Assembly, Security
        Council, the Economic & Social Council, the Secretariat and the Trusteeship
        Council].
THE CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM IN
AUSTRALIA
DIVISION OF POWER: Powers are divided between the States and the
   Federal Government.


1/ Residual Powers: are the powers that the states retained after federation,
    eg police, local councils
2/ Concurrent Powers: areas over which both the states and the
    Commonwealth have legislative power, eg education and health
3/ Exclusive Powers: federal parliament has exclusive power over
    immigration and defence.

SECTION 109- THAT WHERE A CONFLICT ARISES, COMMONWEALTH LAW
   PREVAILS OVER THE STATE LAW


SEPARATION OF POWERS: Power is distributed between the 3 arms of
   government; that is between the legislature, executive and the judiciary.

•   Executive- government responsible for putting the laws passed by the
    legislature into effect.

•   Legislature- is parliament which makes statute law

•   Judicial- courts which solve disputes and interpret statute law
The Court System


             High
             Court


          Supreme
           Court


        District Court


        Local Court
Topic 3: CRIMINAL LAW
• 3.1 Types of Crimes
1. Crimes Against Persons
   Homicide
   ~ Murder
   ~ Manslaughter
   ~ Infanticide
   ~ Death by Reckless Driving
   Assault
   Sexual Assault

•   2. Against Property
•   Larceny
•   Breaking and Entering
•   Robbery

•   3. White Collar Crime
•   Tax Evasion
•   Computer Crime
•   Insider Trading

    4. Crimes Against the State
•   Sedition
•   Treason
5. Public Order Offences
Offences that disrupt the activity of society

6. Traffic Offences
Death By Reckless Driving
Other offences like speeding, parking etc

7. Preliminary Offences
Attempt of crime e.g. attempted murder
Conspiracy

8. Regulatory Offences
Breaking of a regulation


9. Victimless Crimes
Only harms perpetrator. eg. prostitution
•
    SOURCES                    OF       CRIMINAL LAW
•  Most criminal law is made by the state. Under the constitution the
   Federal Parliament does not have specific power to make criminal law.
   They do however in relation to criminal laws that come under their
   exclusive jurisdiction from section 51. For example importation of drugs
   from overseas comes from the Customs Act 1901 (Cth).
The main sources of criminal law come from:
• Statute law
• made by NSW Parliament (with most under the Crimes Act) if no conflict
   with Commonwealth law

•   Common Law
•   judges using their discretion, making decisions which bind because of the
    laws of precedence
•   codification: combining all law (both common and statute) into one act.
    Result: code law

•   Constitutional separation of powers
•   Federal Parliament doesn‟t have the Constitutional power to make
    general criminal laws, but it does make some laws eg Customs Act over
    drug importation

•   Some states of Australia (Qld, Tasmania, W.A) have combined all their
    criminal law (statute / common law) into one Act of parliament. This
    process is called codification or code law.
Parties to a Crime

A principal is directly involved in the commission of the crime

•   First Degree (the person that carries out the act)

•   Second Degree (assists in the commission of offences)

An accessory to the crime is a person who knows about the
   criminal act and provides some form of assistance

•   Before the Fact (knows the crime is about to be committed)

•   After the Fact (knows the crime has been committed and
    provides assistance to the criminal)
    ELEMENTS                   OF       CRIME
Mens Rea (guilty Mind)
• 3 types of mens rea.
1. Intention: Person deliberately intended to commit a crime
2. Recklessness: Person was aware of the danger of their action
    and acted anyway.
3. Negligence: When a person fails to see the rest of their action, a
    risk that an ordinary person would have seen under the same
    circumstances.

Actus Reus (Guilty Act)
• This is the performance of a guilty act or an omission that
   breaks the law.
• the performance (act/duty) that breaks criminal law must:
• take place
• be done by the accused
• be voluntary In Jiminez v R, the high court held that falling asleep at a
    wheel is involuntary conduct. Other examples include; being deprived of
    free choice and a reflex action.
•   in strict liability cases no mens rea needs to be proven.
Causation
The act that was performed must be the cause of the
crime. The act must be ultimately responsible for the
offence.

Novus Actus Intervenes. Intervening Act:

In R v Hallet (Act of god), the victim drowned after the
accused assaulted him and left on the beach, whereby an
incoming wave drowned him. The accused argued that the
victim died via the drowning (Novus Actus) and not the
assault. This was rejected by SA Supreme court arguing
that the conduct of the accused was a substantial and
operating cause of death and that action of the sea would
not have broken the chain of causation as it was a natural
cause as distinct from an act of god (tidal wave).

In Royall (Self- preservation), D was charged with the
murder of a woman who fell from the bathroom window of
her 6th story flat as she feared her attacker. The high court
(Mason CJ) held that her conduct was not a Novus
because the accused had induced her into a well-founded
apprehension of physical harm such as to make it a
natural consequence (reasonable) that the victim would
seek to escape. Therefore not only must V‟s apphrehsion
of harm be well-founded, but V‟s actions in trying to
escape must also have been reasonably foreseeable.
In R v Pagett (Preservation of another) D used his
girlfriend as a shield to protect himself form police
gunfire. D fired at police, who fired back in self-
defence and killed the girl. D argued that a 3rd party
(police) had been the operating and substantial cause
of death. It was found that the police actions were
involuntary and could not break the chain of causation
because it was an act of self- defence and done in
execution of legal duty and it was reasonably
foreseeable.

In this case, if the police officer were a specialist
target shooter who missed, resulting in death, then it
would be a Novus Actus because this is not reasonably
foreseeable.

In R v Blaue (Subsequent medical treatment), the
victim was stabbed but refused a life-saving blood
transfusion on religious grounds and subsequently
died. The English Court of Criminal Appeal held that
the eggshell skull principle means the whole person
(mental and physical) and therefore the accused could
not argue that the chain of causation is broken
because the victim‟s religious beliefs were
unreasonable.
    CRIMINAL DEFENCES
•   Complete Defences: The defendant completely walks free

Duress
• Where the defendant claims that the criminal act committed was
   due to threats or injury to themselves by others. The threat can
   be to the defendant or to another person.

Necessity
• The defendant claims that the crime committed was done to
  stop a more serious crime from occurring, or to stop a more
  serious danger. R v Dudley and Stephens, stated that necessity
  was no defence to murder.

Mental illness (Insanity)
• The onus of proof for insanity lies with the defence. A person
  does not have the necessary mens rea (intention).
• McNaughten Case, a person is mentally insane when they cant
  differentiate between right or wrong
 DEFENCES
Automatism
• A defence used where a person was unable to control
  their actions causing a criminal action to occur. A person
  who has no control their bodily actions.

Accident and Error
 A reasonable person in the same situation would have
   made the same mistake. Eg.under age sex.
Self-defence
• „Reasonable force‟ can be used in the defence of oneself
   to protect property or to stop a serious crime from
   occurring. The onus of proof lies with the prosecution
   who must disprove Self – defence beyond reasonable
   doubt. The main issue with self-defence lies in
   determining what is reasonable force. The accused does
   not have to wait until the initial assault has commenced.
   In some circumstances they may act pre-emptively
   where the attack is believed to be imminent. (Conlon)
 DEFENCES
Consent
• The defendant claims that they acted with the victims consent.
  The defence can either be complete, absolute or partial. It is
  often used in sexual offences.
•
• Case 1: R v BROWN (assault occasioning actual bodily harm)
•
• Involved sado-masochistic homosexuals who consented to acts
  of violence towards each other. The House of Lords found that
  consent was no defence, public morality and their disapproval of
  such conduct swayed them. (Lord Templeman) however Lord
  Mustill and Slynn (in dissent) were of the opinion that criminal
  law should not interfere with private personal morality.
•
• Case 2: R v WILSON, husband branding his initials on his wife‟s
  bum with her consent. English Court of Appeal, quashed
  conviction of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, because of
  no aggressive intent by husband and not in public interest to
  interfere in private martial affairs
 Defences
Partial Defences: The defendant does not completely get off

Provocation
• A defence where the accused was provoked by the victims
   into committing a crime. The offender looses self control
   and acts out of rage. In NSW provocation is only used for
   murder to manslaughter.

Diminished Responsibility
• The defendant acted while mentally ill or disabled and so
  is not entirely responsible for his or her actions. The
  defendant is not mentally ill to the extent required in the
  defence of mental illness.
• R V Desouza, a man on steroids failed in his attempt to
  use this defence due to „roid –rage‟.
Defences
Intoxication
• A normally sane person is so affected by alcohol or other
   drugs that he or she did not know what he or she was
   doing. Self-induced intoxication will generally not be
   taken into account when determining criminal liability for
   murder or manslaughter but intoxication by accident or
   because of a prescribed drug may be considered by the
   court as a defence to other crimes.

Homosexual Advance Defence
• R v Thomas Green
    The Criminal Process and the Role of
    Discretion
•    -Lots of crimes but not all reported or investigated. Police use discretion
     (take action according to own judgement) to decide which cases to
     investigate – resource efficient. Judiciary, Judges, defence lawyers and
     Prosecutors also have discretion.
•    -most crimes are reported by citizens.
•    Investigation – discretion used. Police have investigation powers to:
•    Detain and question people who they suspect has committed a crime
•    Search property and seize evidence that can be used in court.
•    Within legal limits use telephone taps and video cameras.
•    Arrest – Crimes Act allows police to arrest person they reasonably
     suspect of committing a crime. People under arrest have certain rights:
•    Silence
•    Not to be searched – only with a warrant
•    To be released from custody if charge has not been made within
     reasonable time.
•    The right for confessions to be free and voluntary
•    The right for a minor to have an independent adult person present
•    The limited right to legal advice
•    Charge – If police are satisfied that suspect has committed crime, can be
     taken to police station and charged.
Bail – The guarantee given by suspects that they will appear at court later
date or forfeit money. Bail Act 1978 (NSW).
-some cases, bail is granted automatically unless the person:
Was drunk or injured
Already has a conviction
Is in danger of reprisal and needs protection
Is a danger to public
The offence is too serious
Plea Guilty – sentencing hearing – character witnesses (to mitigate)
-Non-guilty – accused held on remand (unless bail) – case is defended in
court – verdict.
-plea bargaining: accuse agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge.
Hearing – Committal hearing – evidence is presented before a magistrate to
determine prima facie.
- If enough evidence – trial proceeds in appropriate court.
IN COURT:
Rules of Evidence – hearsay, character, opinion, leading/double Q‟s.
Trial Procedure – prosecution must prove „beyond reasonable doubt‟. –
Adversary system – 2 adversaries opposing each other. Exam – in – chief,
Cross examination
Role of juries. Jury Act 1977 (NSW). 12 jurers chosen from a larger group –
those liable for discrimination removed etc, must come to unanimous
decision (if not “hung jury” – process begins again), decide guilt.
Appeals – heard in court above. Only can be based on a point of law - not
discontent with outcome e.g. wrongful procedure, misdirection of jury.
Creating Social Order
•   -Aim of the Legal system to create order in society.
•   -informal things like family, school, work, religion and media also help create social order.
•   -When these things fail criminal law provides the „inducement‟ to comply. There are other formal ways
    to create social order before imprisonment:
•   Education – people must be educated about law. Civics has been introduced as a compulsory subject in
    junior levels of school. HSC Legal Studies also provides education. Govt dept‟s issue pamphlets etc to
    educate the nation on the law.
•   Regulation – some laws exist to ensure people and environmental safety e.g. health regulations, OH&S.
•   Coersion – sanctions coerce people into obeying laws – fear of punishment.
•
•
•   The Sentencing Process
•   -accused can be found guilty by a magistrate or a jury.
•   The Hearing
•   After conviction the judge reconvenes court for the sentencing hearing:
•   Evidence – additional evidence such as reports from psychiatrists and psychologists, character
    reference, standing of the accused in the community, hearsay evidence may be used.
•   The role of the prosecutor – in trial, role is ensure conviction. Now it is to ensure judge has all relevant
    info like prior convictions. Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) allows for presentation of
    impact on victim report.
•   Role of the Defence – ensure accused receives most appropriate sentence.
•   The Victim – impact.
•   Factors Affecting the Decision:
•   Purposes of punishment – punishment must fit crime.
•   Circumstances of the Offence (Objective features) i.e. facts of the crime – were weapons used?;
    seriousness of the crime; etc;
•   Circumstances of the offender (Subjective features) e.g. is the offender a minor? Single parent?
    Convicted criminal or first offender? Disability? Drug user? Etc.
•   Aggravating and mitigating factors.
•   Judicial discretion and the limits of discretion – unless mandatory sentencing, discretion by judges can
    be used.
Enforcing the Law through
Punishment.
Purposes of Punishment.
5 categories:
Rehabilitation – reform offender.
Deterrence – prevent or discourage
criminal behaviour through
punishment.
Retribution – „an eye for an eye‟
Incapacitation – most commonly
imprisonment – restricts freedoms
and activities of prisoner.
Redintegrative shaming – shaming the
perpetrator into not re committing the
crime. E.g. confronting the victim.
Used a lot with young offenders.

								
To top