Embed
Email

light

Document Sample
light
Shared by: HC111111144745
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
11
posted:
11/11/2011
language:
English
pages:
49
Light

•Wave Vs. Particles •Light Transmission

•Electromagnetic Waves •Thin Films & Thin Films

Interference

•Frequency and Wavelength

•Michelson-Morely Experiment •Luminosity

•Light Vs. Sound •Polarized Light

•Space Travel & The Speed of •Planck’s Constant

Light •Coherent Light

•Why Objects Have Color •Lasers

•Primary and Secondary Colors •Holograms

•Light Colors Vs. Pigments •Luminous Flux

•The Electromagnetic Spectrum •Illuminance

•Parallax and Depth Perception •Luminous Intensity

•Luminous Flux vs. Power

•Luminous vs. Illuminated

Light: Introduction

For centuries the nature of light was disputed. In the 17th

century, Isaac Newton proposed the ―corpuscular theory‖

stating that light is composed of particles. Other scientists,

like Robert Hooke and Christian Huygens, believed light to

be a wave. Today we know that light behaves as both a

wave and as a particle. Light undergoes interference and

diffraction, as all waves do, but whenever light is emitted, it

is always done so in discreet of packets called photons.

These photons carry momentum, but not mass.









Robert Hooke Christian Huygens Isaac Newton

Wave Vs. Particles

Light is an electromagnetic wave. As light travels through space

an electric field and a magnetic field oscillate perpendicular to

the wave direction and perpendicular to each other. We’ll learn

more about these fields in later units. A light wave is transverse

rather than longitudinal, since each field oscillates in a plane

perpendicular to the direction of the wave. Unlike a pulse

traveling down a length of rope, nothing is physically moving in

a light wave. Light requires no medium! It can travel through

space that contains matter (such as air, glass, or water) or

through a vacuum.



If light did need a medium in order

to propagate, the earth would spend

its days submerged in darkness and

the sun would not be visible.

Electromagnetic Waves

Electric and magnetic fields affect charges. Light is an

electric field coupled with a magnetic field. The two fields

oscillate together but in different planes. To visualize an

electromagnetic wave, you must think in 3-D. Let’s put a

light wave together one piece at a time.









Above is a set of 3-D coordinate axes. The z -axis is

vertical, the y-axis is horizontal, and the x -axis is

coming out toward you.

Electromagnetic Waves (cont.)



The red wave represents an oscillating electric field in the

y-z plane. (Every point on this curve has an x coordinate

of zero.) It is a snapshot in time. At the crests and

troughs, the electric field will exert the greatest force on

a charge, but in opposite directions. Charges located at

the y -intercepts will experience no electric force (at this

point in time).

Electromagnetic Waves (cont.)

In the top right picture, the blue wave represents an oscillating magnetic

field in the x-y plane. (Every point on this curve has an z coordinate of

zero.) It is a snapshot in time. Like the electric field, the magnetic field is

strongest at the crests and troughs.

Bottom right is shown an electric

and a magnetic field oscillating

together. This is an electro-

magnetic wave (light). The fields

travel through space together. They

have the same period and

wavelength, but they oscillate in

two different planes, which are

perpendicular to each other. The

electric field, the magnetic field,

and the wave direction are all

mutually perpendicular. For some Wave Pic Light animation

additional pictures, check out these

links below. Remember, what Propagation in matter

you’re seeing is just a snapshot in

time (see animation). Oscillating charge animation

Frequency and Wavelength

The frequency of a light wave corresponds to the color we see. The

amplitude corresponds to brightness.

Light Sound

Frequency Color Pitch

Amplitude Brightness Loudness



The frequency of visible light is extremely high compared to that of

audible sound. Red light, for example, is the lowest frequency of

visible light, but even red light has a frequency of over 400 trillion

Hertz. This means if you’re looking at a red light, over 400 trillion

full cycles of red light enter your eye every second! The frequency

of violet light is even higher—over 750 trillion Hz. Other types of

electromagnetic radiation, like X-rays, have even higher frequencies,

and some have lower frequencies, like radio waves. Just as our ears

are only capable of hearing certain range of sounds (20 – 20,000

Hz), our eyes can only see a small range of frequencies.

Frequency and Wavelength (cont.)

Because visible light waves have such high frequencies, their wave-

lengths are very short. Recall the formula v = f (wave speed =

wavelength  frequency). Since light of any frequency always

travels at the same speed in a vacuum, v is a constant. Thus, the

bigger f is, the smaller  must be. Red light, for example, has a

wavelength of only about 700 nm. (1 nm = 1 nanometer = 10-9 m =

1 billionth of a meter.) Violet light has an even smaller wavelength,

since its frequency is higher. X-rays have still smaller wavelengths.

Radio waves can have very long wavelengths (many meters) since

their frequencies are so low.









High Frequency ↔ Small Wavelength

Low Frequency ↔ Long Wavelength

Vacuum speed is constant.

Historical Background

• Before Galileo’s time (around 1600), many people believe that

light was infinitely fast. It’s so fast that it seemed like it took no

time to get from one place to another. Galileo and an assistant

went to the Italian countryside, a mile apart, and tried to measure

the speed of light by timing it. All they could determine was that

light is much faster than sound.

• Later that century (around 1667) a Danish astronomer named

Ole Roemer made the first accurate measurement of the speed of

light. He had been observing one of Jupiter’s moons, Io (which

Galileo had discovered). As Io circled Jupiter, it would be eclipsed

by Jupiter periodically. That is, Jupiter would block Io’s view from

Earth at regular intervals. Each time Io orbited Jupiter, an eclipse

would occur. The time between the eclipses was the period of Io’s

orbit. Roemer noticed that the eclipses sometimes took a little

longer, and sometimes they took a little less time. Io’s period

seemed to fluctuate: first Io would be behind schedule; then it

would be ahead of schedule. This pattern repeated itself every

year, which hinted to Roemer that the fluctuation had to do with

Earth’s motion around the sun.

Historical Background (cont.)









Because Jupiter is farther from the sun, it moves much slower

around the sun (recall Kepler’s third law). During the six-month

period depicted above, Earth is moving away from Jupiter.

Therefore, the light carrying the information of the eclipse took a

little longer to reach Earth, since Earth was ―running away‖ from

that light. At the end of the six months, the light from Io had to

travel an extra distance about equal to the diameter of Earth’s orbit.

Roemer’s observed that Io eclipses were about 8 minutes behind

schedule after six months. Knowing approximately Earth’s orbital

diameter, Roemer calculated the speed of light at around 125,000

miles per second! Roemer’s speed, as great as it was, was actually

an underestimate. The true speed of light is just a half a smidgeon

under 3 · 108 m/s, which is about 186,300 miles per second! We

call this speed c. c = 2.9979  108 m/s  3  108 m/s

Historical Background (cont.)

• Roemer’s main contribution was proving that the speed of light is finite.

Since Roemer, several people contributed to determining the precise

value for c. In 1849 Louis Fizeau found an excellent approximation for c

without resorting to astronomical means. He used a rapidly rotating,

toothed wheel. He shined a beam of light through one opening between

the teeth, which reflected off a mirror over 5 miles away. When the

wheel spun fairly slowly, the light could easily pass through the opening,

reflect, and pass through it again in the other direction before its path

was blocked by the next tooth of the wheel. By making the wheel spin

faster and faster until the reflected beam of light was blocked, Fizeau

was able to calculate c.

• Jean-Bernard Foucault also made accurate measurements of c. He

shined light at a rotating mirror, which reflected to a stationary mirror,

back to the rotating mirror, and finally back toward the source. Because

the rotating mirror turned slightly while the light was traveling to the

stationary mirror and back, the rotating mirror reflected the light at a

slight angle. This angle allowed him to calculate c.

Michelson-Morely Experiment

Albert Michelson is best known for an experiment he did with Edward Morely

in 1887. At the time it wasn’t understood that light needed no medium through

which to travel. It was proposed that light traveled through an invisible “ether”

in space. The Michelson-Morely experiment was an attempt to detect Earth’s

motion through the ether. Here’s how it worked: First imagine you’re standing

still outside and there is a wind coming from the north. If you run north, you’ll

measure a greater wind speed. If you run south, you’ll measure it slower.

Whether you run north or south, though, you’ll still feel the wind coming from

the north. If you run east or west, however, not only will the wind seem to

change speed, so will its direction.

Now imagine a race between two equally fast swimmers. They each go the

same distance in a river, but one goes upstream and back while the other

goes directly across the river and back. With no current the race would

definitely be a tie, since their speeds and distances are the same. With a

current, however, the cross-stream swimmer will win. This is not obvious.

You should try to prove this. For a hint see the “river crossing--relative

velocities” slide from the presentation on vectors. It involves the same

principle as Michelson’s interferometer (but without lasers).

Michelson-Morely Experiment

Michelson-Morely Experiment (cont.)

Michelson built something called an interferometer Michelson

to try to measure a change in the speed of light in

two different directions. The Earth moving through

the ether around the sun is analogous to a wind or

current. Instead of racing two swimmers, Michelson

raced beams of light. Light was shone onto a mirror

that allowed half of it to pass through. Each beam

traveled the same distance before being reflected

back and allowed to recombine. Based on the

interference pattern of the combined waves,

Michelson should have been able to detect a

winner. But no matter how the experiment was

done, the race was always a tie. This eventually

forced physicist to abandon the ether theory.

Einstein resolved the problem in 1905 with his

theory of special relativity. In it he asserts that the

speed of light is the same no matter how fast or Einstein

which way an observer is moving.

Light Vs. Sound

It is important to emphasize just how fast light is. Compared to light, sound is

a snail. A wise person once said, “Light travels faster than sound, which is

why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.” Have you ever

watched a baseball game from a distance? You see the batter make contact

with the ball, but the sound of the wallop is delayed. This is because,

although sound is really fast, light is super-duper fast. For all practical

purposes, when you see something is when it happened (at least for events

here on Earth). You can determine how far away a lightning strike is by

counting seconds from the time you see the lightning until you hear the

thunder. It takes sound about 5 s to travel a mile, so if the thunder lags

behind the lightning by 2 or 3 s, then the lightning strike occurred about half

a mile away.



Problem: You hear a thunder clap 6 s after

you see the lightning. Assume the speed of

sound to be 343 m/s. How far away is the

lightning?



(Solution on next slide)

Light Vs. Sound (cont.)

Answer: Ignoring the small amount of time light needs to travel to you,

we have:

d = v t = (343 m/s) (6 s) = 2058 m



Problem: Now let’s do the same problem without ignoring light’s travel

time:









Light Waves Sound Waves

Solution on next slide 

Light Vs. Sound (cont.)



Answer: Let t = time it takes the light to reach you. In that

time the sound of the thunder only travels a short distance.

Since you hear the thunder 6 s after you see the lightning,

the sound travels for (6 s) + t. The light and sound each

travel the same distance, so:



343 (t + 6) = (3 · 108) t

 t = 6.8600078 · 10-6 s

 d = 2058.0024 m



So, the lightning strike really occurred a couple millimeters

farther away than we had calculated the first way. Note: The

difference in results is meaningless here since we can’t know

the time delay or the speed of sound to as many significant

digits as our answer has.

Space Travel & The Speed of Light

We can’t always ignore the time light takes to travel. Whenever you

look into the night sky, for example, you’re really looking back into

time. The stars you see are so far away that the light they emit takes

years to reach us. Nearby stars are tens or hundreds light-years away.

A light-year is the distance light travels in one year, almost 6 trillion

miles. (Our sun is only about 8 light-minutes away).

Problem: Schmedrick is on a space journey heading toward Alpha

Centauri, the nearest star excluding the sun, which is about 4.3 light-

years away. Schmedrick's rocket goes a constant 0.03 c (3% of the

speed of light). As he passes Alpha Centauri he sends a radio

message back to Earth and continues traveling away from Earth. The

Earthlings reply immediately. How long must Schmedrick wait for his

reply?









Solution on next slide 

Space Travel & The Speed of Light (cont.)



Answer: Since we know a trip back and forth from Alpha

Centauri takes a total of 8.6 years, we can set up our

equation in the following way:

d = vt (c = 1 in light years per year)



8.6 + v t = c t

 8.6 + 0.03 c t = c t

 8.6 + 0.03 t = t A. C.

 8.6 = 0.97 t S.

 8.6 / 0.97 = 8.87

vt

4.3 ly

Schmedrick will have to wait 8.87 years to get a reply back

from earth.

Links: Find out more about Alpha Centauri here.

Why Objects Have Color

Visible light is a combination of many wavelengths (colors), which

give it a white appearance. When light hits an object certain

wavelengths are reflected and others are absorbed. The reflected

wavelengths are the ones we see and determine the color of an

object.









In the first picture the tomato absorbs blue and green wavelengths

and reflects the red wavelength. In the second picture red light is

shone upon the tomato. The tomato is still reflecting the red

wavelength and thus still looks red. But in the 3rd picture blue light is

shone upon the tomato, and since the tomato absorbs the blue

wavelength the tomato appears to be black.

Links: Prism (light broken down in different wavelengths.

Primary and Secondary Colors









The primary light colors are Red, Blue, and Green (RGB).

The secondary light colors are Yellow, Cyan, and Magenta.

Combining pigments in painting is exactly the opposite:

The primary pigments are Yellow, Cyan, Magenta.

The secondary pigments are Red, Blue and Green. Animation

Light Colors Vs. Pigments

Primary colors in light are red, green, and blue because when put together

in the right intensities they form white light. Televisions use this idea to

project pictures on the screen. When lights these colors are combined in

pairs they form the secondary colors for light.



Pigment colors are seen by reflected light. A primary pigment color is one

that absorbs only one primary light color and reflects the other two primary

colors. Thus yellow, magenta, and cyan are the primary colors for pigments.

Yellow reflects red & green, cyan reflects green & blue, and magenta

reflects red & blue. Secondary pigments colors then are blue, green, and

red because they absorb two primary light colors and reflect their own light

color back.

The Electromagnetic Spectrum









The electromagnetic spectrum covers a wide range of wavelengths and

photon energies. Visible light ranges from 400 to 700 nanometers.

About 550 nanometers, which is a yellowish green, is the wavelength to

which our eyes are most responsive. Only a small portion of the

electromagnetic spectrum is visible to us. The smaller the wavelength,

the more energy each photons of the light has.

Electromagnetic Spectrum (cont.)

Wavelengths other that visible light serve useful purposes:

Radio waves are very long (a few centimeters to 6 football fields) and can

be used to send signals. These signals are transmitted by radio stations.

They transmit information and music via amplitude modulation (AM) and

frequency modulation (FM).

Microwaves (a few millimeters long) are also used in communications.

Microwave ovens are great for heating food since food is primarily water, and

microwaves have just the right frequency to get water molecules vibrating.

Infrared (micrometers in length) are used in remote controls to change the

channel, and they are also radiated by objects that are warmer than their

surrounding (like your body). They make night vision equipment possible.



Ultraviolet light is harmful to our bodies because its wavelength is so

small. Short wavelength mean high energy for photons. UV causes our

skin to tan and burn. Fortunately, the ozone layer blocks most UV

radiation, but prolonged exposure to the sun should be avoided, since UV

rays can cause skin cancer. On the positive side UV radiation helps

people to produce their own vitamin D.

Electromagnetic Spectrum (cont.)

X-rays are even more energetic, and hence more dangerous, than UV

rays, but luckily they cannot penetrate our ozone layer. They are

produced in space and of course are used by doctors to get pictures of

your bones.

Gamma rays are the most energetic of the light waves and little is known

about them other than they are very harmful to living cells and are used

by doctors to kill certain cells and for other operations. They are

produced in nuclear explosions. Like other high energy rays, our

atmosphere protects us from gamma rays.

Astronomers have many different types of telescopes at their disposal to

observe the universe in all parts of electromagnetic spectrum. Some

telescopes are

ground-based; others

are space-based:



Arecibo Spitzer

Hubble Keck

Compton

Parallax and Depth Perception

Parallax is any alteration in the apparent position of an object due to

a change in the position of the observer. A simple demonstration of

this effect can be seen by extending your thumb at arm’s length.

Then close one eye at a time and note how your thumb appears to

jump left and right relative to the background. Now move your

thumb closer and note how the jump is greater. This technique can

be used in astronomy to find a star’s distance from Earth. For

distant objects like stars, astronomers must move their “eyes” as far

apart as possible. They accomplish this by observing the apparent

displacement of a star against the background of more distant stars

resulting from the change of the Earth’s position in orbit. The

parallax angle is exaggerated in the picture below.







 



Parallax and Depth Perception (cont.)

The picture is not to scale. The diameter of Earth’s orbit is very small

compared to the distance of the star being measured, which in turn

is very small compared to the distance of the background stars. For

this reason the angular displacement of points A and B, as seen

from Earth at any point in its orbit, is almost exactly the same as the

parallax angle.

Problem: Back on Earth Schmedrick attempts to figure out how far

away a certain distant star is. He figures out a 2 degree parallax

angle from two different observations made during the earth’s

period. How far away is the star? (Earth 93 million miles from the

sun.) Solution on next slide.

A







2o





B

Parallax and Depth Perception (cont.)



Answer: Let R be the Earth-sun distance and x the distance to the

star in question. Thus,



tan ( / 2) = R / x. With  = 2 and R = 93 million miles,



x  5.33  109 miles



The Star Schmedrick is looking at is approximately 5 billion miles

away. So, Schmed must have been imagining this star, because it’s

much too close for any real life star (other than the sun).





R

2o

x

Luminous vs. Illuminated

A luminous object is a body that produces its own light such as

the sun or a light bulb.

An illuminated object is a body that reflects light, just like the

moon, people, and buildings.

Some objects, like water and glass, transmit light to some

extent. In order to be seen, light must come from an object one

way or the other.

Luminosity & Magnitude

Luminosity is the rate at which energy of all types, and in all

directions, is radiated by an object. The luminosity of a star depends

on its size and its temperature: L  R 2 T 4. The sun is a medium-

sized star with a luminosity of 3.8×1026 J/s. The known luminosities

of stable stars range from about a millionth that of the sun for a

relatively cool white dwarf to about a million times that of the sun for

the hottest known super-giant star. Astronomers assign stars

magnitudes based on how bright they are. Apparent magnitude

measures how bright a star appears to be from Earth. Absolute

magnitude measures its true luminosity.

The brighter the star, the lower its

luminosity. Every 5 magnitudes

corresponds to brightness changing

by a factor of 100. For example, a

magnitude 1 star is 10,000 times

brighter than a magnitude 11 star.

Besides the sun, the brightest star as

seen from Earth is Sirius with an

apparent magnitude of -1.6.

Light Transmission



Transparent: Materials, such as window glass,

through which light can travel easily and through

which other objects can clearly be seen.



Translucent: Materials, such as glass blocks,

through which light can pass through but no clear

image can be seen.



Opaque: Materials which absorb and reflect light.

Objects cannot be seen through the material. Most

objects are opaque.

Thin Films & Thin Film Interference

The thin film effect refers to colors seen in

such things as soap bubbles and oil spills. It

occurs as a result of the constructive and

destructive interference of light waves, not

because of refraction as in a prism. When light

hits a bubble, some of it is reflected by the

outer (air-soap) interface (ray #1), while some

penetrates the bubble wall and is reflected by

the inner (soap-air) interface (ray #2). The two

reflected rays interfere with one another.

Typically, most wavelengths will be out of

Guinness Soap Bubble Records

phase since #2 has to travel a greater

distance than #1. However, one wavelength will be in

incident ray phase and this corresponds to the color produced.

The color depends on how great the difference in

#1 distance is that the two rays travel, and this distance

#2 depends on bubble thickness. The variations in

reflected thickness (thinner at the top, thicker at the bottom)

rays are responsible for the different colors.

Soap Bubble Wall Continued on Next Slide

Thin Films (cont.)

When light moving through the air encounters the denser film the reflected

ray is inverted, just like a pulse traveling down a slinky is inverted when it

reflects at the connection point with a heavier spring. The transmitted ray

is not inverted, which is also the situation with slinky and spring. When

the transmitted ray encounters the soap-air interface at the inside of the

bubble, again some of it is reflected back. This time, however, the wave is

not inverted (just as a pulse traveling on a heavy spring is not inverted

when it reflects at the connection point with a slinky). The two reflected

rays may or may not be in phase; it depends on how thick the film is.

Since white light is comprised of many wavelengths, those that are nearly

in phase after reflecting off the bubble surfaces will be reinforced

(constructive interference). This is the color that will appear on the bubble.

The other wavelengths are out of phase (destructive interference) and

are, at least partially, cancelled out.



Since gravity causes the bubble to be thicker near the bottom, different

wavelengths are reinforced at different heights, producing bands of colors.

Interestingly, a bubble on the space shuttle will not produce bands of

different colors. This is because the shuttle is in free fall around Earth,

which means bubbles behavior as if they’re in a gravity-free environment.

Thus, bubbles are of uniform thickness.

Continued on Next Slide

Thin Films (cont.)

So how do we determine which color will be produced at a particular

point on a bubble or other thin film? Well, if the thickness of the film

is /4, then light of wavelength  will be reinforced. Here’s why: The

then the round trip in the film will be /2. This means the two waves

will be in phase, since one was inverted and one wasn’t.

Bubble Wall

 /4

Original Wave

Transmitted

wave

superimposed

with upright

wave from 2nd

Inverted wave reflection

from 1st reflection

superimposed

with upright wave

from 2nd reflection

air outside bubble air inside bubble

Polarized Light

Light coming directly from the sun or Electric Field

other sources is unpolarized, meaning Orientations

the electric and magnetic fields oscillate

in many different planes. Polarized light refers to

light in which all waves have electric fields oscillating in the same plane.

Imagine trying to pass a large piece of sheet metal through the bars of a

jail cell. To do this you would have to orient the sheet vertically (or nearly

so), otherwise the bars would block the sheet. Here, the bars are

analogous to a polarizing filter, and the sheet is analogous to the plane

in which the electric field is oscillating.

A polarizing filter is made of a material with long molecules that allow

electromagnetic waves of one orientation through. If a wave has an electric

field with any other orientation, the filter will only allow a component to

pass through, absorbing the rest. Note that only transverse waves such as

light can be polarized. Much of the light we see is at least partially

polarized. For example, when light reflects off of surfaces it is partially

polarized. Some sunglasses contain polarizing filters which helps to block

glare (such as the glare that is noticeable when looking out over a lake on

a sunny day).

Polarized Light Glare Molecular View

Continued 

Polarized Light (cont.)

Unpolarized light propagates in all orientations. No particular orientation is

preferred. When it passes through a filter that only allows vertical

components of electric fields to pass, its intensity is cut in half. This is

because, on average, the light is “half horizontal and half vertical” in terms of

electric field components. All horizontal components are blocked, making

the resulting polarized light half as bright.

Now, imagine that you place another filter that is perpendicular to the

direction of the first one, i.e., a filter that only allows the horizontal

components of electric fields to pass through. This would completely block

the remaining light. Thus, any two perpendicular filters will block all incoming

light.

Suppose now that the two filters are offset by some angle . Regardless of

the angle, the first filter blocks half the light. If  = 0, the second filter has no

effect. If  = 90, the second filter blocks the other half of the light. In gen-

eral, when polarized light with an electric field of amplitude E passes

through the second filter, the amplitude will drop to E cos. Furthermore,

since the energy a wave carries is proportional to the square of its ampli-

tude, the intensity of the light will be the original intensity multiplied by cos2.



Blocking Light Continued on Next Slide

“Twisting” of Light

We know that if  = 90 between two filters, then no light will

make it past the second one. At other angles light will pass

through both, changing the orientation of its electric field each

time. So, what if we arranged several polarizing filters so that the

angle between any two consecutive filters is less than 90? The

answer is that light twists its way through the filters, even if the

angles between the filters adds up to 90. With each pass the

light is oriented in a new direction, and this new orientation has a

component parallel to the orientation of the next filter.



Light

Enters

Light

Exits







Twisting Light

Quantum Mechanic--Background

Recall that a black body is an ideal absorber of all incident radiation. A hot

black body is also a perfect emitter--radiation is the result of its temperature,

and since none of this is absorbed, it is a perfect emitter of radiation. A black

body emits all wavelengths of light but not equally; there is always a

wavelength in which the radiation peaks. The hotter the black body, the

smaller the peak wavelength. Objects

around you are cool, so their peak is in

the infrared. The sun is hot enough to

peak in the visible spectrum (all other

wavelengths are emitted too but at

lower intensities).



In the late 19th century classical physics

had predicted something impossible: as

the temperature rises, the intensity of

the peak radiation approaches infinity

(red dashed line). The theory did match

experimental data for large wavelengths

but failed for small ones. This was

known as the “ultraviolet catastrophe.”

Planck’s Constant

In 1900 Max Planck came up with a revolutionary way to

resolve the problem by assuming that energy came in

discrete amounts (quanta). This was the beginning of

quantum mechanics. Each quantum of light is called a

photon, and its energy is given by E = h f, where f is the

frequency of the radiation and h is the constant of

proportionality called Plank’s constant. The formula states

that higher frequency light has proportionally more energy

per photon. Einstein lent credence to Plank’s ideas by

explaining the photoelectric effect in a similar manner.

Robert Millikan did a series of experiments involving the

Max Plank photoelectric effect and calculated the constant:

h = 6.626  10-34 J s.

Before Planck light was considered to be a wave. Today we know it can be

interpreted as either a particle or a wave. As a wave, bright light can be

explained as a large amplitude in the electric and magnetic fields. As a

particle, bright light would be explained by a large number of photons.

Coherent Light

Lamps, flashlights, etc… all produce light. But this light is released in

many directions, and the light is very weak and diffuse. In coherent

light the wavelength and frequency of the photons emitted are the

same. The amplitude may vary. Such things as lasers and

holograms are composed of coherent light.

Incoherent









Coherent

Lasers

Laser stands for light amplification by stimulated emission of

radiation. A laser is a device that creates and amplifies a narrow,

intense beam of coherent, monochromatic (one wavelength) light.

Here’s how they work.

There are 2 primary states for an atom, an excited state and a

ground state. The ground state is the lowest energy, most stable

state. In the excited state electrons are in a higher energy level. In a

laser, the atoms or molecules of a crystal (such as ruby) or of a gas,

liquid, or other substance are excited in the laser cavity so that more

of them are at higher energy levels (excited state) than are at lower

energy levels. When an excited electron drops back to a lower

energy level, a photon of a particular wavelength is released. This

photon stimulates other electrons to emit photons. All these photons

are in phase.

Holograms

As with any type of wave, light waves can interfere with one another.

The interference of two or more waves will carry the whole

information about all the waves. It is on this basis that holograms

work. Holograms make use of lasers and they work in the following

fashion: (Explanation on next slide.)





Laser Beam Splitter



Mirror

Reference Beam



Object Beam



Light wave

Beam Spreader

interference





Film Plate

Object

Holograms (cont.)

As the laser hits the beam splitter, it is split in two. The object beam heads

towards the object of interest, while the reference beam heads toward a

mirror. The beams are identical until the object beam shines on the object.

There some of the light is absorbed; some is reflected toward the film. After

reflecting off the mirror, the reference beam is reunited with the object beam

on the film. Because one beam interacted with the object and the other didn’t,

the two beams will be out of phase and interfere with one another. This

interference pattern is imprinted upon the holographic film plate, creating the

holographic image.

This pattern records the intensity distribution of the reflected light just as an

ordinary camera does. However, it also records the phase distribution. This

means that it contains information about where the waves are in their

oscillating cycles as they strike the film. To determine this the object beam

must be compared with the reference beam. This is accomplished via the

interference. Also unlike an ordinary photo, a hologram contains all its

information in every piece of it.

When viewed in coherent light the object appears in 3-D and viewing a

hologram from different angles will reveal the object from different angles.

Luminous Flux & Illuminance

Luminous flux, , is the rate at which an object emits visible light

(adjusted to the responsiveness of the human eye, which is most

sensitive to yellow-green). It is measured in lumens. Imagine a light

source in the center of a sphere. Luminous flux is the quantity of

light that hits the surface of the sphere per unit time. The size of the

sphere is irrelevant. If the sphere were larger, the same quantity of

light would reach the surface every second, so the flux wouldn’t

change. However, this light would be more spread out, so the

illuminance of the surface would be less than it was with the same

candle in the smaller sphere. Also called illumination, the symbol for

illuminance is E, not to be confused with

energy, and is defined as luminous flux per

unit of surface area: E =  / S. The SI unit

for illuminance is the lux, which is a lumen

per square meter. The illuminance of the

sun is about 100,000 lx (lux); for the full

moon it’s about 0.2 lx. A common, non-SI

unit for illuminance is the foot-candle,

which is equivalent to about 10.8 lx.

Illuminance vs. Distance

A point source at P radiates light in all directions. The pic below

shows how light spreads out as it radiates. If the illuminance on the

sheet 1 m from P is 1 unit, then the illuminance on the sheet 2 m from

P is four times less. This is because doubling the distance increases

the area by a factor of four over which the light is spread. Similarly,

3 m from P the illuminance is nine times less, and 4 m from P it’s 16

times less. Note the flux (amount of light) is not changing, but the

illuminance is because the same amount is spread over different

areas. In general, E is proportional to  and inversely proportional to

the square of the distance. This is reminiscent of Newton’s inverse

square law for gravitation. 1/16

1/9

1/4

1







P 1m 2m 3m 4m

angle = arc length = 1 unit

Solid Angles

1 radian

We can measure ordinary, “flat” angles by

the ratio of arc length of a circle to the

radius of the circle. Imagine two radii

shooting out from the center, subtending radius

part of the circumference. By definition this = 1 unit

ratio is the measure of the angle between

the radii in radians. There are 2  radians in

a circle since C = 2  r.

Now imagine a sphere instead of a circle

and a cone shooting out from the center

rather than a two radii (the apex of the cone

is at the center). Instead of part of a circum-

ference, the cone subtends part of the

surface area of the sphere. A solid angle

(measured in steradians) is defined as the

ratio of the subtended surface area of the of

sphere to the square of its radius. This

definition applies even if the subtended area

is not circular. There are 4  steradians in a

sphere since S = 4  r 2.

Luminous Intensity

Recall that illuminance is flux per unit area. A related quantity is luminous

intensity, I, which is defined as flux per unit of solid angle. Thus, I = Ø / 4,

since there are 4  steradians in a sphere. You can think of luminous intensity

as the amount of light contained within a cone whose apex is at the source.

The same amount of light confined to a skinnier cone would mean a greater

intensity. Just as the “flat” angle is independent of the size of the circle, the

solid angle is independent of the size of the sphere. The intensity is the same

at every sheet in the pic below. In a sphere 7 m in radius, I is the flux that falls

on a 49 m2 surface on the sphere. The SI unit for intensity is the candela, cd.

1 cd = 1 lumen per steradian. A footcandle is the

illuminance one foot away from a 1 candela source.









P 1m 2m 3m 4m

Efficiency of light sources

Light sources, like light bulbs, vary in efficiency. This means

that some bulbs, e.g. fluorescent bulbs, will produce more light

while using less energy. (They can do this by producing less

waste heat.) The efficiency of a simple machine is the work

done by the machine divided by the work put into it. In this

context, efficiency is the rate at which light is produced by the

bulb divided by the rate at which energy is used to produce that

light: eff = Ø / P, where P is power. Note that both flux and

power are rates, so eff is really “light over energy.” It is

measured in lumens per watt. A typical candle has an efficiency

of about 0.1 lumen / W. Incandescent bulbs are about 15

lumen / W, but a fluorescent bulb is closer to 70 lumen / W.

A monochromatic source emitting light of around 555 nm in

wavelength would be the ideal in terms of efficiency, with all of

its radiation being visible to us instead of infrared (waste heat).

Credits

Numerous Images as well as information were obtained from the following sources:



http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/Bima/spectrum.html



http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/star-distance.html



http://abalone.cwru.edu/tutorial/enhanced/files/lc/light/light.htm



http://www.netzmedien.de/software/download/java/polarisation/



http://www.howstuffworks.com/sunglass4.htm



http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/polarization/polarizationI.html



http://www.cs.brown.edu/exploratory/research/applets/catalog.html



http://www.intl-light.com/handbook/flux.html



http://www.schorsch.com/kbase/glossary/luminous_flux.html



http://www.natmus.min.dk/cons/tp/lightcd/lumen.htm



http://www.bipm.fr/enus/5_Scientific/e_rad_phot/photometry/luminous_flux.html



http://webdesign.about.com/library/weekly/aa111201a.htm



http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/light/u12l2a.html



http://cowan.bendnet.com/darksky/Illuminance.htm



http://www.chemie.de/tools/units.php3?language=e&property=cd*sr%2Fm%5E2

Credits (cont.)

http://www.worldlights.com/world/candela.html



http://www.westsidesystems.com/rays.html



http://www.electro-optical.com/bb_rad/emspect.htm



http://violet.pha.jhu.edu/~wpb/spectroscopy/em_spec.html



http://www.augustana.edu/academ/physics/physlets/resources-1/dav_optics/EMWave.html



http://littleshop.physics.colostate.edu/Color_Mixing.html



http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/java/image/rgbColor.html



http://www.nobel.se/physics/educational/tools/relativity/experiment-1.html



http://www.encyclopedia.com/



http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/quantumzone/photoelectric2.html



http://www.askjeeves.com/main/followup.asp?qcat=ref_&ask=what+is+parallax&qsrc=0&o=0&snp=jeeves&qid=9FD4

952E186CE248994B552F9E7DDF63&dt=020415095320&back=ask%3Dwhat%2Bis%2Bparallax%26o%3D0%26fmt%3D&

qcatid=62&score=0.76&aj_ques=snapshot%3DJeeves%26kbid%3D1967190%26item1%3D1990098-

2247110&aj_logid=9FD4952E186CE248994B552F9E7DDF63&aj_rank=1&aj_score=0.76&aj_list1=1990098-

2247110&x=26&y=13



http://www.holonorth.com/anatom.htm



http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~avery/course/3400/f2001/lectures/lecture_lumens.pdf



http://www.schorsch.com/kbase/glossary/solid_angle.html



http://www.egglescliffe.org.uk/physics/astronomy/blackbody/bbody.html


Related docs
Other docs by HC111111144745
340LIFESPANNotes_001
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Internshipagencies
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
seligman_offprint_catalogue
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Professional 20Practice 20Library 20Catalogue
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
D D_3e_prc_list
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Paper_Xiaodong_Final
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ChristianEdSermon
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
liveart_cityvenue_london
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2344_american_indian_authors v1
Views: 43  |  Downloads: 0
3913_06162004_142542_ecology01 3061
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!