Curriculum Resource Center
Course Development Project
“Theory and Practice of Civil Society” by Antonina Kolodii
Advanced Course for MA Students
of NaUKMA
INTRODUCTION
The course addresses civil society as a concept and social practice. It is set aside for MA students who
specialize in social sciences (from political science to social philosophy). It is supposed that students who
signed up for the course have already studied courses in the history of philosophical and political thought,
general theory of democracy and are acquainted with the problems of ransition to democracy. The course
will be provided in Ukrainian though students are supposed to make a lot of reading in other languages,
especially in English.
Theory of civil society was developed by political and social philosophers during centuries. Nowadays it
is becoming also a subject of applied sociological and political research. So, in many aspects the topic of
civil society require interdisciplinary approach. Still, the course directely deals with socio-cultural
conditions of politics and therefore perfectly fits the curriculum of the Department of Political Science.
After studying this course students will have broader vision of connection between social and political
life, society and state.
Many Western scholars (L. Diamond, E. Gellner, J. Keane, and others) admit, that the notion of civil
society is more precise and sociologically concrete than the notion of democratization. It provides a good
starting point for the analysis of post-communist transformation. At the same time, being usually accepted
on the everyday level, civil society concept often seems to have ambiguous meaning on the level of
theory — because of unfinished discussions over its stages, functions and traits. In this aspect lies the
great methodological value of the proposed course for MA students who are supposed to move political
theory on, explaining puzzles and resolving dilemmas.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE
GOALS
The general aim of the course is to help students to better understand major pillars for and challenges to
contemporary democratic regimes, as well as the problems of transition to democracy — by means of
going in depth of contemporary debate over the problem of civil society. Besides, the course will show
the explanatory and prognostic capacity of Political Science because the topic of civil society occupies
advanced positions within contemporary social theory.
The more concrete goals of the course are:
to get students familiar with contemporary debate about social and cultural background of democratic
stabilization and about civil society as a condition and manifestation of liberty;
to engage them into discussion about meanings, uses, internal structure and functions of civil society,
especially in the context of transition to democracy;
to give students broader vision of the challenges on the road of democratic transformation.
OBJECTIVES
At the beginning, the stages of evolution of civil society (as a concept and a reality, which it designates)
will be considered. From there we will proceed with the study of different understandings of the
phenomenon, paying special attention to current debate on the subject. After an attempt to work out (or to
choose) a compromised and, at the same time, empirically useful definition, we will examine different
dimensions of civil society (structural, cultural, and interactive) and turn to comparative analysis of civil
society modulations in old and new democracies. Finally, we will study historical tradition and present
situation with development of civil society in Ukraine and confront challenges to its successful
institutionalization.
The main learning outcome should be higher level of competence in the aspects of political and social
theory described above, ability to teach the topic for lower level students and to choose more concrete
“Theory and Practice of Civil Society” by Antonina Kolodii
topic for doing research. Familiarization with the range of activity and literature of Ukrainian ―third
sector― may stimulate for co-operation with its institutions.
COURSE DETAIL
General Course Description
The whole number of topics = 9. The whole number of class hours for MA students = 24 (12 weeks
during one trimester X 2 hours). Some of the topics therefore will be considered both at the lectures and
seminars, others — only at one kind of classes.
These topics are:
I. The classical idea of civil society (The historical evolution of “civil society” as a concept and
a reality).
II. Contemporary discourse on civil society.
III. Systemic character of civil society.
IV. Institutional dimension of civil society.
V. The culture of civil society. Civic community and “social capital".
VI. Historical / geographical modulations of civil society. Civil society in old and new
democracies.
VII. Civil Society as a Strategy of Transition.
VIII. Problems and prospects for civil society institutionalization in Ukraine.
IX. Civil society and politics.
The distribution of topics between lectures and seminars will be as follows:
Topic lectures themes hours seminars themes hours
№
1. Historic evolution of civil society and 2
theoretical perceptions of it
2. Contemporary civil society discourse 2 Revival and the substance of civil 2
society concept
3. Structural dimension of civil society 2 2
4. Culture of civil society 2 Structural and cultural dimensions of 2
civil society
5. Systemic character of civil society. 2 2
6. Modulations of civil society 2 Intermediate control of knowledge 2
7. Civil society and transition to democracy 2
8. Problems and perspectives of 2
institualization of civil society in
Ukraine
9. Civil society and politics 2
12 12
2
“Theory and Practice of Civil Society” by Antonina Kolodii
LECTURE SYNOPSIS
Lecture 1. The classical idea of civil society (The historical evolution of “civil society” as
a concept and a reality).
From Locke to Hegel. A new vision of civilizing process and its social and political consequences. ―State
of nature‘, ―barbarian societies‖ and ―civil society‖. Free market, morality and civility. Theoretical
separation of social and political spheres, civil society and state. Hegel about structure of civil society and
its internal contradictions. A. de Tocqueville on the role of community, associational life and free press in
overcoming individualism in America and in producing what is now called ―social capital‖. Marxist
utopia of destructuralization of social life and the decline of the concept of civil society.
Conceptualization of the history of civil society as an idea and as reality by J. Alexander (civil society-1,
-2, -3). Ukrainian thinkers about civic life and role of communities.
Lecture 2. Contemporary discourse on civil society.
Revitalization of civil-society concept by European neo- and post-Marxists. ―Civil society‖ and the
upsurge of mass movements in Central and East Europe. Crash of communist systems and transition to
democracy. ―Civil society‖ as a transitional strategy. Civil society in the works of J. Habermas‘ and his
followers — J. Kohen and A. Arato. Causes of renewing interest to the concept of civil society in
Western democracies. ―Civil society‖ in the discourse of the welfare state. Contemporary trends in
interpretations of civil society and their philosophical sources (scheme 1). R. Putnam‘s works and
academic debates around them. Views on civil society of J. Alexander, E. Gellner, J. Keane. What civil
society is and what it is not? Research on civil society in contemporary Ukraine.
Lecture 3. Systemic character of civil society.
Senses, ascribed to the term ―civil society" in our times; degree of their concordance (scheme 2). To-
wards a definition of civil society. Civil society as a subsystem and a qualitative characteristic of a social
system. The problem of determining the boundaries of civil society. Civil society and societal sphere:
differences and similarities. Functions and traits (attributes) of civil society. Institutes, culture and
practical interactions as aspects of civil society. The problem of complex definition of civil society (ideal,
social reality, models). Essence of civil society as an ideal type. Its features, aspects and functions. Civil
society and Habermas‘ notions of ―public sphere‖. Public opinion and mass media in the system of civil
society. Civil society as a condition of liberty; its relationships with legal democratic state.
Lecture 4. The institutional dimension of civil society.
A. Arato about civil society as a movement and as an institution. Internal institutional composition of
civil society. Mass movements as a specific form of civic activity. Pluralism and voluntary civic
organizations. The nature of volunteerism. NGO, the ‗third sector‘ and civil society. Typology and
functions of NGO. Civil society and non-civic movements and organizations (a debate about their role).
Rule of law and legal space for civil society. The role of non-liberal organizations within the civil society.
Why civil society did not prevent the rise of nazism in Germany in the 30-s? Civil society and forms of
political participation. Elections and referenda as institutions of civil society. Civil society and political
society. Spheres of origin and further affiliation of political parties. Mass media as an institution of civil
society an a means of civil – political interaction.
Lecture 5. Culture of civil society.
The initial meaning of the notion ―civil society‖ as civilized and peaceful society. Overcoming ―state of
nature‖ and ―barbarianism‖. Morals and manners of pluralistic democracy. Civility — everyday culture of
civil society. Influence of the patterns of social life on political culture. Trust and tolerance as features of
political culture of civil society. ‗Civic culture‘, civic competence and responsibility. Contemporary
debates over G. Almond‘s and S. Verba‘s ideas about civic culture. Public opinion as a mirror of political
culture. Culture and structure: what is the casual relationship between them. N. Rosenblum about moral
uses of membership in pluralist societies. Civic community and social capital (after Putnam). Political
culture of postcommunist societies.
3
“Theory and Practice of Civil Society” by Antonina Kolodii
Lecture 6. Historical / geographical modulations of civil society.
Real civil societies as a basis for polyarchies. Historical models of civil societies. Functional (analytical)
modulations of civil society. N. Rosenblum about ―democratic‖, ―mediative‖ and ―elective‖ civil
societies. National/geographical modulations of civil societies. Civil society in the USA: specific features,
evolution, debates over its present status and perspective. Civil society in Great Britain and Canada. Civil
societies in continental Western Europe in comparative perspective. Institutionalization of civil societies
in transitional systems. Post-communist transitions and the revival or emergence of civil societies.
Towards European (and global) civil society? International civil movements and organizations.
SEMINARS
(Questions for discussion and topics of essays)
Seminar 1. Revival of the conception of civil society and its substance
1. The causes of contemporary revival of the conception of ―civil society".
2. The meanings of the notion ―civil society".
3. Civil society as an ideal type. Its aspects (institutions; culture; forms of practical interaction) and
functions.
Essays:
Criteria of historical stages of civil society evolution.
B. Kistiakivskiy about interdependence of legal state and civil society.
Spiritual revival on the turn of ХІХ-XХ centuries and the rise of civic and political activity of
Ukrainians: major manifestations.
Seminar 2. Institutes of civil society.
1. Toqueville about individualism and the the ways of its overcoming in the USA. Associations and
press in America.
2. Contemporary "third sector" as constituent of civil society. Typology of NGO.
3. Tendencies of NGO development in countries of stable democracy.
4. Mass media as an institute of civil society.
Essays:
Structural components of civil society: the essence of contemporary discussions (R.Putnam,
J.Kohen, J. Keane, J. Alexander)
Political and legal institutions of civil society: elections, referendums, juries, voluntary law-enforcing
services etc.
Is civil society on decline in the USA?
Contradictions of civil societies: ―uncivil" associations in civil society.
Why couldn‘t civil society prevent the rise of fascism in Germany in the 30-ies?
Seminar 3. Culture of civil society.
1. Civility as a trait of civil society.
2. Civic competence and concern about public good.
3. ―Civic culture".
Essays:
Theory of civic culture and transitional societies.
Trust as feature of social consciousness and behavior in Poland and Ukraine (a comparison).
Public interest and civic competence.
Decline of civility: does it influence the effectiveness of civil society?
Promotion of competence or manipulation with consciousness? Role of mass media in contemporary
civil societies.
4
“Theory and Practice of Civil Society” by Antonina Kolodii
Seminar 4. Civic community and “social capital".
1. Types of communities and self-government.
2. The notion of ―social capital‖ and conditions of its creation.
3. ―Social capital", civic virtues and political development.
Essays:
Historic forms of public life in Ukraine. Ukrainian traditional communities (hromadas).
Ukrainian thinkers about communities‘ development as a basis for social progress.
What is common in regional development of Italy and Ukraine?
Seminar 5. Civil Society as a Strategy of Transition
1. The content of postcommunist transformation and renewing or emergence of civil societies (examples
of Poland, Hungary, Russia).
2. Transitional strategy: civil society as a means of tyranny resistance and precondition of
democratic consolidation.
3. Change of functions and institutional forms of civil society during transitional period.
Essays:
New democracies in Latin America on the way to civil society.
South-East Asia and Africa: efforts to make societies civil and their results.
Contemporary discourse on civil society in Ukraine and other postcommunist countries.
Creation of all-European and global civil societies: real tendencies or utopian fantasies?
Seminar 6. Formation and further development of civil society in Ukraine.
1. Historical preconditions of civil society in Ukraine.
2. The "first wave" of civil society revival in Ukraine (late 80-s-early 90-s).
3. Institutions of civil society in contemporary Ukraine.
4. The problem of establishing liberal values and civic culture.
Essays:
Typology of NGO in Ukraine.
Charity and its regulation by law in Ukraine.
Ukrainian mass media as an institute of civil society.
Public sphere and public opinion: level of development and qualitative characteristics.
Do we really know what kind of mentality Ukrainians have?
Seminar 7. Civil society and policy.
1. Civil society as a pluralist model of the defense of interests.
2. Uncivil forms of interaction and protection of interests (clientelism, corporativism and
neocorporativism; coercion and terrorism).
3. Political parties in civil and uncivil society (distinctions in the methods of formation and activity).
Essays:
Civil and political society: their interconnection and interdependence of the ways of activity.
Interest groups and lobbying practices in Ukraine: civil forms for uncivil conduct?
Civil society and ruling elite in democratic societies: roles and influence.
Varieties of uncivil societies: traditional; totalitarian; clientelistic, oligarchic and anarchic.
IV. Student Assessment
Estimated form of the work
Active participation in the lectures 10%
Active participation in the seminars 20%
Test control 10%
Presentation of a thesis 20%
Final examination 40%
The highest possible estimation 100 points
5
“Theory and Practice of Civil Society” by Antonina Kolodii
V. READING LIST
TOPIC 1. The classical idea of civil society (Historical evolution of “civil society” as a
concept and a reality).
Classical works:
Гегель Г. В. Ф. Основи філософії права / Перекл. с нім. — Київ: Юніверс, 2000. — С. 169-211.
Драгоманов М. Переднє слово до ―Громади‖ / Вибрані твори. Т.1. — Відень, 1937.
Грушевський М. Початки громадянства (генетична соціологія) — Відень, 1927.
Кістяківський Б. Держава і особистість / Кістяківський Б. Вибране. — Київ: Абрис, 1996. — С. 237–274.
Токвіль, Алексіс де. Про демократію в Америці. — К.: Всесвіт, 1999. (С. 197-201- громадські настрої;
216-226 – суди; 409-428 — асоціативне життя, а також: 149-167 - партії та політичні об‘єднання).
Франко І. ―Гуцульська спілка‖. ―Як би нам в біді рятуватися?‖ ―Що таке громада і чим би вона повинна
бути?‖ ―Громадські шпихліри‖. ―Спілки рільничі‖ / Зібрання творів у п‘ятдесяти томах. — Т. 44. Книга 2.
— Київ: Наукова думка, 1985. — С. 61-63; 162- 165; 175-180; 181-182; 243-244.
Locke. Political Essays. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. — Р.
Paine, Thomas. Rights of Man / In.: The American Age of Reason: Benjamin Franklin. Thomas Jefferson.
Thomas Paine. — Moscow: Progress, 1977. — P. 224-290.
Contemporary interpretations:
Alexander, J. C. "Civil Society I, II, III: Constructing an Empirical Concept from Normative Controversies and
Historical Transformations" / In: Alexander, Jeffrey C., ed. Real Civil societies. — London etc.: Sage, 1998. — P.
1-19.
Keane, John. Despotism and Democracy. The Origins and Development of the Distiction Between Civil Society
and the State 1750-1850.— In the book: Civil Society and the State. New European Perspectives. Ed. by John
Keane. — London - New York: Verso, 1988. — P. 35-71.
TOPIC 2. Contemporary discourse on civil society.
Mandatory:
Арато Е., Коен Дж. Відродження, занепад і реконструкція концепції громадянського суспільства //
Політична думка. — 1996. — № 1. — С. 25-31.
Кін Дж. Громадянське суспільство. Старі образи, нове бачення. — Київ: "К.І.С."; "АНОД", 2000. — C. 39-68.
Колодій А. Теоретичні підходи і eмпіричні моделі громадянського суспільства: проблема відповідності / В
кн.: Громадянське суспільство як вияв свободи: східно-європейський досвід – Львів, 1999. — С.
Перегудов С. П. Гражданское общество: ―трехчленная‖ или одночленная модель // ПОЛИС. — 1995. — №
3. — С. 58-60.
Keane, John. INTRODUCTION / In: Keane, John, ed. Civil Society and the State. New European Perspectives. —
London - New York: Verso, 1988.
Walzer, Michael. "The idea of Civil Society: A Path to Social Reconstruction" // Dissent. — Spring, 1991. — P.
293-303.
Recommended:
Колодій А. Громадянське суспільство як основа міжетнічної толерантності // Українські варіанти.— 1998.
— № 3.— С. 49-52.
Франко І. Хома з серцем і Хома без серця / Зібрання творів у п‘ятдесяти томах. Т. 22. — Київ: Наукова
думка, 1979.
Putnam, Robert. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy — Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 1994. — Ch. 1—3, C. 3-82.
TOPIC 3. Systemic character of civil society.
Габермас Юрген. Структурні перетворення у сфері відкритости. Дослідження категорії громадянське
суспільство. — Львів: Літопис, 2000.
Крос К., Гакет Р. Політична комунікація і висвітлення новин у демократичних суспільствах: Перспективи
конкуренції. — К., 2000.
Alexander, Jeffry C. ―Bifurcating discourses‖ / In: Alexander, Jeffrey C., ed. Real Civil societies. — London etc.:
Sage, 1998. — P. 96-114.
6
“Theory and Practice of Civil Society” by Antonina Kolodii
Alexander, Jeffry C. "Bringing Democracy Back In: Universalistic Solidarity and the Civil Sphere" / In:
Ch. Lemert, ed. Intellectuals Beyond Academy. — Sage, 1990. — P. 157-176.
Walzer, Michael. "Rescuing Civil Society" // Dissent. — Winter, 1999. — P. 62-67.
TOPIC 4. Institutional dimension of civil society.
Mandatory:
Кін Дж. Громадянське суспільство. Старі образи, нове бачення. — Київ: "К.І.С."; "АНОД", 2000. — С.
113-149.
Крос К., Гакет Р. Політична комунікація і висвітлення новин у демократичних суспільствах: Перспективи
конкуренції. — К., 2000.
Сунгуров О. Організації-посередники в структурі громадянського суспільства // Політична думка. — 1999.
— № 4. — С. 43-57.
Ткачук Анатолій. Український "третій сектор": деякі думки з приводу юридичної природи та термінології
// Перехрестя. — 2000. — № 4. — С. 30-33.
Токвіль, Алексіс де. Про демократію в Америці. — К.: Всесвіт, 1999. — С. 409-428 — індивідуалізм та
асоціативне життя як засіб його подолання, а також: 149-167 - партії та політичні об‘єднання; 197-201-
громадські настрої; 216-226 – суди.
Ahrne, Göran. ―Civil Society and Uncivil Organizations‖ / In: Alexander, Jeffrey C., ed. Real Civil societies. —
London etc.: Sage, 1998. — P. 84-95.
Hayghe, Howard. "Volunteers in the U.S.: Who donates the time" // Monthly Labour Review. — 1991. —
February. — P. 17-23.
Recommended:
Berman, Sheri. "Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic" // World Politics. — Vol. 49. — April,
1997. — P. 401-29.
Foley, Michael W. & Bob Edwards. "The paradox of civil society" // Journal of Democracy. — Vol. 7 — July,
1996. — P. 38-52.
Roniger, Luis & Ayse Gunes-Ayata, eds. Democracy, Clientelism, and Civil Society. — Boulder (Colo.): Lynne
Lienner, 1994.— P. 1-18; 87-103; 207-214.
TOPIC 5. Culture of civil society. Civic community and “social capital".
Mandatory:
Карась А. Соціокультурний текст громадянського суспільства: конструктивність і деструктивність
соціальності. — В кн.: Громадянське суспільство як здійснення свободи: Центрально-східноєвропейський
досвід / За ред. Карася А. Ф. — Львів, 1999. — С.39-62.
Молчанов М. Політична культура України: радянська чи пострадянська // Сучасність. — 1995. — № 10. —
С. 59-69.
Токвіль, Алексіс Д. Про демократію в Америці. — К.: Всесвіт, 1999. — С. 63-78.
Франко І. Що таке громада і чим би вона повинна бути. // Зібрання творів у п’ятдесяти томах. — Т. 44,
кн. 2. — С. 175-180.
Åberg, Martin. "Putnam`s Social Capital Theory Goes East: A Case Study of Western Ukraine and L'viv" //
Europe-Asia Studies. — Vol. 52. — No. 2. — 2000. — P. 295-317.
Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba. The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Ch.
VI. The Sence of Civic Competence. — Newbury Park; London; New Dehli, 1989. — P. 136-185.
Putnam, Robert. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy — Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 1994. — Ch. IV; VI. P. 83-120; 163-185.
Shils, Edward. "Civility and Civil Society. Good Manners between Persons and Concern for the Common Good in
Public Affairs" / In: Edward Shils. The Virtue of Civility. Selected Essays on Liberalism, Tradition, and Civil
Society. Ed. by Steven Crosby. — Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1997. — P. 63-102.
Recommended:
Грушевський М. Початки громадянства (генетична соціологія) — Відень, 1927.
Давимука С., Колодій А, Кужелюк А., Подгорнов В., Черниш Н. Львівщина-98. Соціальний портрет у
загально-українському контексті. — Львів, 1999.
Драгоманов М. Переднє слово до ―Громади‖ / Вибрані твори. Т.1. — Відень, 1937.
Політичний портрет України. Українське суспільство. 1994-1997. — Бюлетень фонду ―Демократичні
ініціативи‖. — 1998. — № 20.
Процьків М. Від особистої культури до політичного майбутнього // Сучасність. — 2000. № 3. — С. 80-89.
7
“Theory and Practice of Civil Society” by Antonina Kolodii
Франко І. ―Громада‖ і ―задруга‖ серед українського народу в Галичині і на Буковині / Зібрання творів у
п’ятдесяти томах. — Т. 44, кн. 1.— С. 487- 495
Франко І. Захар Беркут Образ громадського життя Карпатської Русі в ХІІІ віці / Зібрання творів у
п’ятдесяти томах. Т. 16. — Київ: Наукова думка, 1978. (Передмова - с. 7- 8; повість - с. 9-154. 1883 р.)
Marsh, Christopher. "Social Capital and Democracy in Russia" // Communist and Post Communist Studies. —
Vol. 33. — No. 2 (June) — 2000. — P.183-199.
Newton, Kenneth. "Social Capital and Democracy in Modern Europe" / In: Jan W. van Deth, Marco Marraffi,
Kenneth Newton and Paul F. Whiteley, eds. Social Capital and European Democracy. - London and New York:
Routledge / ESPR, 1999.
Stompka, Piotr. "Mistrusting Civility: Predicament of a Post-Communist Society" / In: Real Civil societies. Ed. by
Jeffrey C. Alexander. — London etc.: Sage, 1998. — P. 191-209.
TOPIC 6. Historical / geographical modulations of civil society. Civil society in old and
new democracies.
Mandatory:
Токвіль, Алексіс де. Про демократію в Америці. — К.: Всесвіт, 1999. — С. 409-428.
Gellner, Ernest. Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals. — London: Penguin, 1994.
Putnam, Robert. "Bowling Alone. American declining Social Capital" // Journal of Democracy. — Vol. 6. — No.
1 (January). — 1995. — P. 65-78.
Stengel, Richard. "Bowling Together. Civic engagement in America isn't disappearing, but reinventing itself" //
Time. — July 22, 1996. — P. 35-36.
Smith, Jackie. ―Global Civil Society? Transnational Social Movement Organizations and Social Capital‖ // The
American Behavioral Scientist. — Vol. 42. — No. 1. (Septtember, 1998). — P. 93-107.
Stolle, Dietlind & Thomas R. Rochon. "The Myth of American Exceptionalism. A
three-nation comparison of associational membership and social capital" / In: Jan W. van
Deth, Marco Marraffi, Kenneth Newton and Paul F. Whiteley, eds. Social Capital and
European Democracy. — London and New York: Routledge/ESPR, 1999.
Recommended:
Полуйко В. Громадянське суспільство Канади — погляд з України // Громадські ініціативи. — Випуск 5-й.
— С. 13–14.
Штерн С. Ініціативи громадян, групи самодопомоги і громадські об‘єднання (приватна активність в
Німеччині) // Громадські ініціативи. Випуск 6-й. — С. 8–13.
Kolodii A. ―Civil Life in America: Lessons for Transitional Society in Ukraine‖. — В кн.: Інтеграція України у
світове співтовариство. — К., 1999.
TOPIC 7. Civil Society as a Strategy of Transition.
Mandatory:
Bernhard, Michael. "Civil Society after the first transition: dilemmas of post-communist democratization in Poland
and beyond" // Communist and Post Communist Studies. — Vol. 29 — No. 3 (September) — 1996. — P. 309-330.
Diamond, Larry. "Toward Democratic Consolidation " / In: L. Diamond and M. F. Plattner, eds. The Global
Resurgence of Democracy. Second edition. — Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press. P. 227-240.
Fukuyama, Francis. "The Primacy of Culture" // Journal of Democracy. — Vol. 6. — No. 1 (January). — 1996.
— P. 7-14.
Illner, Michal. "Second Thoughts on the Transformations in Eastern and Central Europe" / In: European Societies:
Fusion or Fission? — London; New York, 1999. — P. 235-245.
Recommended:
Fox, Jonathan. "The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico" // World Politics.
— Vol. 46. — No.2 — 1994. — P. 151-184.
Gibson, James L. "A Sober Second Thought: An Experiment of Persuading Russians to Tolerate" // American
Journal of Political Science. — Vol. 42. — No. 3 (July) — 1998. — P. 819-850.
Havel, Vaclav &Vaclav Klaus. "Civil Society after Communism: Rival Visions" // Journal of Democracy. —
Vol. 7 — No. 1 (January). — 1996. — P. 12-23.
Smolar, Aleksander . "Civil Society after Communism: from Opposition to Atomization" // Journal of Democracy.
— Vol. 7. — No. 1 (January). — 1996. — P. 24-38
8
“Theory and Practice of Civil Society” by Antonina Kolodii
TOPIC 8. Problems and prospects for civil society institutionalization in Ukraine.
Mandatory:
Пасько Ігор, Пасько Ярослав. Громадянське суспільство і національна ідея. Україна на тлі європейських
процесів. Компаративні нариси. — Донецьк: Східний видавничий дім, 1999. — С.
Полохало В. Середній українець — соціальна основа негромадянського суспільства // Політична думка. —
1999. — № 4. — С. 30–32.
Сидоренко Олександр. Чи знаємо ми, що таке насправді український "третій сектор"? // Перехрестя. —
2000. — № 4. — С. 4-7; № 5. — С. 4-7.
Ткачук Анатолій. Неприбуткові, недержавні організації в Україні. Проблеми законодавчого забезпечення //
Перехрестя. — 2000. — № 1. — С. 26-29.
Фартушний А. Громадянське суспільство та пострадянські реалії. — В кн.: Громадянське суспільство як
здійснення свободи: центрально- східноєвропейський досвід. / За ред. А. Карася. — Львів, 1999. С. 251-259.
Цимбалістий Б. Тавро бездержавности. Політична культура українців. — Київ, 1994.
Recommended:
Бебик В.М., Сидоренко О.I. Засоби масової iнформацiї посткомунiстичної України. - К., 1996.
Горбачов Дмитро. Парадокси росту: вплив донорської допомоги на розвиток третього сектора в Україні //
Перехрестя. — 2000. — № 1. — С. 12-13.
Касьянов Г. Незгодні. - К.: Либідь, 1995.
Курносов Ю. Боротьба за гратами (соціальне обличчя та форми змагань українських в‘язнів сумління у
1960-х - 80-х роках) // Другий міжнародний конгрес україністів. Львів, 22-28 серпня 1993 р. Доповіді і
повідомлення. Історія, ч. ІІ. - Львів, 1994. — С.
Кьоніг Девід. НДО: корпоративна підтримка // Перехрестя. — 2000. — № 1.
Русначенко А. Робітничий рух в українській революції 1989-1991 років // Другий міжнародний конгрес
україністів. Львів, 22-28 серпня 1993 р. Доповіді і повідомлення. Історія, ч. ІІ. - Львів, 1994, с. 149-154.
Сидоренко Олександр. Громадські і благодійні організації України // Перехрестя. — 2000. № 2. С. 20-21.
TOPIC 9. Civil society and politics.
Mandatory:
Авинери Ш. Партии, социально-культурная медиация и роль гражданского общества // ПОЛИС. — 1995 —
№ 1. — С. 48-50.
Гарань О. В. Убити дракона. З історії Руху та нових партій України. — К., 1993. — С.
Каспрук В. Україна у пошуку втраченого майбутнього // Сучасність. — 1999. — № 5. — С. 66-78.
Кін Дж. Громадянське суспільство. Старі образи, нове бачення. — Київ: "К.І.С."; "АНОД", 2000. — С.
113-149.
Колодій А. Вибори-98 і становлення громадянського суспільства в Україні // Українські варіанти. 1998. —
№ 2. — С. 20-29.
Перегудов С. П. Организованные интересы и государство // ПОЛИС. — 1994. — № 2. — С. 76-87.
Турчинов О. Особливості української олігархії // Політична думка. — 2000. — № 3. — С. 13-19.
Roniger, Luis & Ayse Gunes-Ayata, eds. Democracy, Clientelism, and Civil Society. — Boulder (Colo.): Lynne
Lienner, 1994.— P. 1-18; 87-103; 207-214.
Recommended:
Каспрук В. Україна наша олігархічна // Сучасність. — 2000. — № 12. — С. 46-52.
Якушик В., Ватсон Ш., Мейс Дж., Малєєв К. Корупцiя як суспiльний феномен // Політична думка. —
1994. — № 4. — С.25-31.
9