Embed
Email

transcript

Document Sample
transcript
Shared by: HC111111062715
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
7
posted:
11/10/2011
language:
English
pages:
31
Transcript and Slide Notes For the Perkins Teleconference Presentation/ WMV



Slide 1

Intro page for Telecast



Slide 2

Welcome to the Division of Workforce Education Funding Telecast for the Carl D.

Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006, better known as “Perkins IV.”

As you know, Florida’s five-year state plan was developed in consultation with leading

Career and Technical Education practitioners from all over the state.



I want to personally thank those of you who participated on state planning teams and

those of you who contributed recommendations at our statewide public hearings. Your

recommendations helped shape one of the most innovative plans in the nation, our state

plan.



Perkins IV represents a new direction for career and technical education in Florida. Major

themes in our plan include:

• Emphasis of secondary to postsecondary transition

• Increased accountablility for student performance

• Collaboration with business and industry partners

• Integration of academic and career and technical education.

During the telecast you will hear highlights from Perkins IV and the state policies that

have been incorporated into our new state plan.



Slide 3

I am excited about the release of the 2008-2009 Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Act

of 2006 (Perkins IV) funding opportunities information.



Slide 4

Kathleen Taylor share with you Florida’s State Plan which represents a new direction for

career and technical education in Florida. She will share highlights from the Act and

state policies that have been incorporated into the State Plan.

Dr. Mark Baird will provide an overview of Florida’s secondary and postsecondary

performance measures. Perkins IV supports a state and local performance accountability

system designed to assess the effectiveness of state and local funding recipients in

achieving progress in CTE secondary and postsecondary student performance.

Florida expects combined funding of $65,622,232 for the program year 2008-2009. The

Act requires that no less than 85% be sent out to support local secondary and

postsecondary career and technical education programs. We will be sending out 88.34%

to support local programs and intend to set aside 9% of that for the reserve fund.

Kathleen Taylor will share information related to the state formula for determining the

sector split as well as the Act’s prescribed formulas for secondary and postsecondary

distribution.

Florida has consolidated Tech Prep with the basic grant so all CTE students may benefit

from a program of study with accompanying articulation. As you also heard, Florida has

crafted additional state program of study requirements in order to achieve the goal that by

2013 all CTE programs will be offered via a comprehensive program of study. The

Career Pathways Consortia will play an important role in this statewide effort which

Gayle Manley will share with you.

Just as the Florida Department of Education must submit a five year state plan to the US

Department of Education, you must submit a new five year local plan/application to

FLDOE. By now you have had some time to study the RFAs posted on the grants web

page and have realized this is not “your father’s Perkins application”. It truly reflects the

State Plan and its goal to provide quality career and technical education programs to

assist students to transition seamlessly to postsecondary education and training. Doreen

Dumond will provide an overview of the applications.

Eileen Amy will share important information on the division’s newly formed Quality

Assurance Team which will provide compliance and monitoring for our Perkins eligible

recipients.

Closing Remarks

I encourage you to send any and all inquiries to the following e-mail address

PerkinsIV2008@fldoe.org. At this time I want to thank you for your participation and

for all you do for Florida’s career and technical education students.



Slide 5

Title page for Kathleen Taylor, Senior Education Program Director



Slide 6

Thank you Gloria.



The Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 was signed into law in

August of 2006.

Shortly thereafter the Division of Workforce Education in consultation with stakeholders

from across Florida, embarked on a year long planning process to develop Florida’s state

plan.



Perkins IV represents a new direction for career and technical education. Eighty-five

years after the passage of the first piece of federal vocational education legislation, career

and technical education has evolved from its original and sole focus on preparing

students for work immediately following high school.

Now there is an expectation of continued education beyond high school and into

postsecondary education.



For those of you who have been integrally involved with Tech Prep over the past few

years, the connectivity between the goals of Tech Prep and Perkins IV is evident.



Slide 7

Perkins IV validates this evolution from a vocational education system to a career and

technical education system, one that is no longer separate and apart from academic

education. A system that requires that college and work readiness are one and the same.

The most significant change in the Act is that the definition of vocational and technical

education has been replaced with the term, “career and technical education.” The

original clause in Perkins III restricting preparation for careers to those not requiring a

baccalaureate, master’s or doctoral degree is eliminated. Now CTE programs can prepare

students for careers that may require a baccalaureate degree or advanced degrees like

engineering.



Slide 8

The Act puts in place an enhanced Performance Accountability System that requires

results and program improvement at all levels. While accountability was a strong

component in Perkins III, Perkins IV contains the addition of a new section on local

accountability that will require local programs to set specific performance targets on each

performance indicator and be responsible for meeting those targets. You will hear more

information on local performance accountability later in this telecast.



Several changes were also made to the specific performance indicators that states and

local programs will have to report on under Perkins IV. At the secondary level, academic

attainment will now have to be measured by the academic assessments a state has

approved under NCLB. In Florida, that is 10th grade FCAT exams in Reading and Math.

Graduation rates will also have to be reported as defined in NCLB and student

achievement on technical assessments must be aligned with industry-recognized

standards when possible.



At the postsecondary level, academic attainment is no longer reported as a separate

measure.

Student placement in high-wage, high-skill or high-demand occupations or professions

must be measured.



Academic and technical integration is another theme that has existed in prior Perkins

laws, but continues to be expanded upon. The Act puts a specific emphasis on

professional development that addresses the integration of academic and technical skills,

and that involves academic and CTE teachers working together to the greatest extent

possible.



As mentioned previously, career and technical education is preparing students to enter

postsecondary education and so the Act emphasizes close connections between secondary

and postsecondary education and requires students have programs of study available for

them.



The Act continues to emphasize the role of business and industry in career and technical

education.



Slide 9

The State Board of Education approved Florida’s Five-Year Plan on Feb. 19. and this

plan was submitted to the USDOE Office of Vocational and Adult Education on April 1.

Florida will be negotiating state performance levels between April and June of 2008 and

that information will be released separately from the RFAs. Mark Baird will be sharing

information later in this presentation related specifically to performance accountability.



Slide 10

At this time, I would like to share some of the major highlights from the state plan. If you

have had an opportunity to attend the public hearings and or review the RFA and

accompanying implementation guide, then much of this information will be familiar to

you.



Slide 11

To develop the state plan, Florida followed the “Guide for the Submission of State Plans”

released from the US Office of Vocational and Adult Education last year. This guide

provides a framework upon which states build their state plans. As required by the

“Guide”, Florida’s state plan is organized into 3 parts– Part A is the Narrative Section

which details seven key areas of planning, coordination and collaboration prior to state

plan submission, program administration, provision of services to special populations,

accountability and evaluation, tech prep programs, financial requirements and EDGAR

certifications. Part B consists of financial forms and Part C consists of the required

accountability forms also known as the FAUPL or Final Agreed Upon Performance

Levels.



Florida’s five-year state plan and accompanying appendices may be found on the

Division of Workforce Education Homepage. Simply click the Perkins IV link and you

will find the Plan as well as a number of helpful resources.



Slide 12

As required by the law, the state plan was developed in consultation with practitioners in

the state who served on planning committees for CTE programs, grants, accountability

and data and Tech Prep.



In November 2007, the Division of Workforce Education conducted public hearings in

Broward Co., Tampa, Orlando, Tallahassee and Jacksonville. Many recommendations

made at the public hearings were adopted and incorporated into the state plan. For a

summary of public hearing responses and recommendations please see Appendix A.2 of

Florida’s State Plan located on the Division of Workforce Education Home Page.



Slide 13

One of the major state plan highlights of the plan has to do with Tech Prep Programs.



But first a little background on Tech Prep:

Since Perkins II, Tech Prep has provided the link between secondary and postsecondary

career and technical education programs. The actual definition of the phrase articulation

agreement was contained within Title II Tech Prep Education Act and Tech Prep students

were required to be enrolled in a program of study that offered seamless transition from

secondary to postsecondary education.

Slide 14

Perkins IV continues to maintain a separate Tech Prep delivery system but some

significant changes have occurred between Perkins III and IV. One of the historic shifts

in the new Act is that secondary and postsecondary eligible recipients must offer

programs of study for all interested CTE students. Once available to a small subset of

students (Tech Prep students), now all CTE students can benefit from voluntary

participation in a program of study.



In addition, the description of CTE programs of study (also known as career pathways) is

very close to the description of what a Tech Prep program is meant to be. The new

definition of an articulation agreement is contained in section 3 of the Act and

incorporates the critical elements of a Tech Prep program. Perkins IV gives states the

option to consolidate Tech Prep funds with the basic state grant.



Florida’s State Plan describes Florida’s decision to consolidate Tech Prep funds

beginning July 1, 2008.

Perkins IV represents the very best of Tech Prep and through the success of Tech Prep

in Florida, all CTE students will have the opportunity to participate in a program of study

and transition seamlessly to postsecondary education, which is a major theme in the Act.



Slide 15

As detailed in the state plan, over the course of the five years of Perkins, Local

Educational Agencies will be expected to convert their stand alone CTE programs to

programs of study incorporating the elements in the Act.



See the bulleted items on slide 15 - 17.



Slide 16

This slide is discussed in conjunction with the previous slide.



Slide 17

This slide is discussed in conjunction with the previous slide.



Slide 18

If you have already read this year’s RFA and accompanying Implementation Guide, you

are well aware that Florida has put in place additional state requirements regarding the

implementation of programs of study. Along with those requirements, flexibility has

been built in for meeting those requirements and eligible recipients have the option of

either:



Joining a career pathways consortia and committing a minimum of 1.5% of their basic

state grant for the consortium to carry out the Program of Study requirements on behalf

on the individual LEA

OR

Not joining a career pathways consortia and expending a minimum 3% of the basic grant

funds to carry out the state program of study requirements.



Later on in this presentation, Gayle Manley will be providing information related to the

Career Pathways consortia and its requirements as detailed in the Career Pathways

Consortia application.



Slide 19

These requirements must be met by either a consortia on behalf of its members or by the

individual LEA should it choose not to join a career pathways consortia.



As you can see, a phase in approach has been implemented over the course of the 5 years

of Perkins.



During 2008-2009, LEAs or consortia will be required to convert a certain percentage of

existing local programs of study to Florida’s State Program of Study Template. In

addition, LEAs or consortia will be required to convert a certain percentage of stand-

alone CTE programs (CTE programs not currently offered in a local program of study) to

Programs of Study using the state template.



During the remaining program years of Perkins, LEAs or consortia will be required to

continue converting local Program of Study (POS) to the state template as well as convert

stand-alone CTE programs to POS using the state template. In addition, LEAs or

consortia will work with division staff to develop statewide secondary to postsecondary

articulation agreements for specific programs of study.



Slide 20

The concept of size, scope and quality has been around since Perkins III. In the law,

local eligible recipients must provide assurances that their programs are of such size,

scope and quality to bring about improvement in the quality of CTE.



USDOE has never defined this phrase nor provided guidelines, so therefore states have

broad discretion in customizing this concept.



The Division of Workforce Education has now developed new state programmatic

requirements for size, scope, and quality which must be met by secondary and

postsecondary eligible recipients. Both the secondary Perkins RFA and postsecondary

Perkins RFA requires eligible recipients to provide information to demonstrate that CTE

programs being offered by eligible recipients meet the new state requirements for size,

scope and quality and therefore are eligible for Perkins funds.



Slide 21

Florida requires that secondary eligible recipients provide a certain number of career and

technical education programs depending on the size of the school district.

In addition, the required minimum number of programs offered must also meet the

programmatic requirements under “scope” and “quality.” It is important to note that

secondary eligible recipients would still be permitted to support CTE programs with

Perkins funds over and above the minimum number of programs required that may or

may not meet this size, scope, criteria detailed in the next few slides.

In order to be eligible for funding, recipients must provide a certain number of CTE

programs depending on the size of the district.

** Please refer to the chart in the implementation guide which categorizes the 67 districts

into small, medium and large for eligible recipients. Districts with 3% or more of total

state CTE “job preparatory” enrollment are considered “large” and would be required to

offer 5 programs. Districts with 1% - 2.99% of the total state CTE “job preparatory”

enrollment are considered “medium” and must offer a minimum 3 CTE programs and

districts with less than 1% of the total state CTE “job preparatory” enrollment are

considered “small” and must offer no less than 1 CTE program.



Slide 22

The next requirement for size requires eligible recipients to provide an opportunity for

students to become CTE concentrators.



Secondary students enrolled in CTE programs who achieve “concentrator” status (3

credits or more) will be included in the secondary performance population for secondary

core indicators of performance that require concentrator vs. participant. Dr. Mark Baird

will be providing additional information on performance accountability definitions and

measures later in this telecast.



Slide 23

These required minimum number of CTE programs must provide acceleration

mechanisms for students and must be aligned with business and industry.



Slide 24

These required minimum number of programs must provide opportunities for students to

earn industry certification and or licensure in regulated programs and must be classified

as High Skill, High Wage or High Demand.



Slide 25

These required minimum number of programs must ensure integration of academic and

technical education



Again, I want to reiterate that secondary eligible recipients would still be permitted to

support CTE programs with Perkins funds over and above the minimum number of

programs required that may or may not meet the size, scope, criteria just detailed.



Slide 26

Perkins IV presented states with historic changes in how states are to deliver career and

technical education. It became apparent that Florida’s CTE frameworks, which provides a

foundation for curriculum, needed to undergo extensive review and revisions if

necessary, in particular the middle school frameworks when appropriate.

It was determined that some frameworks needed to be revised to stay current with trends

and future practice. Furthermore it was determined that certain courses would need to be

revised to provide foundational information within a specific cluster at the middle school

level leading to specific skill development within a specific program of study in a specific

pathway in high school.



That said, Perkins IV funds will not be permitted to support certain 7th and 8th grade

courses and 9-12 courses. State funds are permitted to support any course in the course

code directory. The Implementation Guide contains the list of the courses ineligible for

Perkins support.



Slide 27

The guiding questions detailed in this slide were used during curriculum framework

review.



Slide 28

Again, you may reference Part B of the Implementation Guide for additional information.



Slide 29

Postsecondary eligible recipients must provide an opportunity for students to become

CTE concentrators.



Postsecondary students enrolled in AS, AAS, ATD, PSAV, or CC programs who achieve

“concentrator” status (or the 1/3 program framework threshold) will be included in the

postsecondary performance cohort for each of the postsecondary core indicators of

performance.



Slide 30

Postsecondary CTE programs must meet the needs of local business and industry.



Slide 31

Postsecondary program offerings must provide opportunities for students to earn industry

recognized credentials and programs offerings must be classified as High Skill or High

Wage or High Demand.



Slide 32

Integration of academic and technical education must be part of postsecondary program

offerings.



Slide 33

What is the criteria?

LEAS must accept state performance targets or negotiate with the state for different

levels of performance. The actual negotiation process is outlined in section four of the

plan and will be detailed in the local applications.

State and locals must meet 90% of an agreed upon performance target. Failure to meet

90% of the target for 3 years will result in the development of improvement plan.



Negotiations may take place in spring 2008 but since the first year is baseline data, it will

be tough to enter into negotiations until we have some actual data available in the late fall

of 2008. So a more realistic timeframe for negotiations will be spring 2009.



Slide 34

Baseline data does not present a sound basis upon which to base local performance

negotiations. Therefore, Florida determined it would accrue one year of actual data

before entering into local negotiations. Therefore locals will be required to meet or

exceed state targets in 08-09.



Slide 35

Title page for Dr. Mark Baird, Director of Research and Best Practices



Slide 36

There are 20 accountability measures built into the Perkins IV state plan: eight

secondary-level measures, six clock-hour program measures, and six credit-hour

program measures. Data for the measures are extracted from existing state information

systems comprised of data submitted by all 67 districts and 28 community colleges. To

define the population of career and technical education students, two categories were

created: participants and concentrators.

At the secondary level, a participant is a student who has earned at least one credit in a

secondary CTE program, including allowable dual enrollment substitutions. Secondary

participants are used in only one measure: 6S1, non-traditional enrollments.

Secondary concentrators are students who have earned three or more credits in a single

CTE program or two credits in any approved two-credit program. Currently

environmental science is the only two-credit program. Secondary concentrators are used

in all measures but 6S1.



Slide 37

Because of Florida’s unique dual post-secondary delivery system, there are distinct

definitions and measures for college credit and clock-hour programs, and each categorize

participants and concentrators differently.

College credit participants, who are found only in community colleges, are students who

have earned one or more credits in an AS, AAS, college credit certificate, or advanced

technology diploma program. Participants are used only in measure 5P1, non-traditional

participation.

Concentrators are community college students enrolled in an AS, AAS, college credit

certificate, or advanced technology diploma program who have completed at least one-

third of the required number of credits listed for the program in the curriculum

frameworks. Concentrators are used in all credit hour measures but 5P1.

Slide 38

Clock hour participants and concentrators are found in both community colleges and

districts. Participants are students who are enrolled in a career certificate or advanced

technology diploma program and have earned at least one credit. Concentrators are

students enrolled in a career certificate or advanced technology diploma program who

have accumulated at least one-third of the clock hours listed for the program in the

curriculum frameworks.

For community college students, total clock-hours earned toward award are found in the

community college student database. For district career certificate or advanced

technology diploma students in the 2008-09 reporting year, total clock hours will be

calculated based on the hours associated with earned occupational completion points.

Hours earned before the first or after the last reported occupational completion point may

be submitted by districts as a supplemental file. For 2009-10 and subsequent years,

districts will sum hours associated with new course codes to calculate cumulative

program hours.



Slide 39

1S1 and 1S2, academic attainment, is the percentage of secondary concentrators who left

secondary education who made adequate yearly progress (based on if the student scored a

three or better on the 10th grade reading and math FCAT respectively). These measures

are designed to determine if CTE students are exiting secondary education with

proficiency in reading and math and are aligned with the reporting requirements of the

Elementary and Secondary Education Act, also known as the No Child Left Behind Act.

2S1, technical skill attainment, is designed to measure the extent to which CTE students

are leaving secondary education with validated technical skills. The denominator

consists of senior concentrators who left secondary education in the reporting year. The

numerator consists of students in the denominator who have earned either an

occupational completion point or a valid industry certification applicable to their program

of concentration. The use of occupational completion points as a validation of technical

skill attainment will be gradually phased out as the state moves toward third-party

assessments, particularly industry certifications, as more valid and reliable measures of

skill attainment.



Slide 40

3S1, secondary school completion, is the rate at which high school senior concentrators

who left secondary education in the reporting year earned a standard high school diploma

or GED.

4S1, student graduation rates, is the percentage of CTE concentrators included in the

state’s calculation of the No Child Left Behind graduation rate who obtained a standard

high school diploma or GED. The No Child Left Behind graduation rate tracks a cohort

for four years beginning with 9th grade and accounts for incoming and outgoing transfers

during that period. The number of students in the cohort who received standard diplomas

or GEDs constitutes the numerator for the percentage calculation.

5S1, secondary placement, takes as its denominator CTE concentrators from the prior

year who completed secondary school. This should equal the 3S1 numerator from the

prior year. Of these students, the numerator consists of those who, in the reporting year,

were placed in postsecondary education, any employment or military service.

Placements are identified by matching student records with the Florida Education and

Training Placement Information Program or FETPIP.

6S1, non-traditional participation, measures the participation rate of students of an

underrepresented gender in programs that are traditionally underrepresented by one

gender or the other. For example, females are traditionally underrepresented in welding

programs, and males are underrepresented in early childhood education programs.

Gender underrepresentation among programs is determined by historical enrollment

patterns. 6S2, non-traditional completion, is the rate at which senior CTE

concentrators of an underrepresented gender obtained a standard diploma or GED.



Slide 41

Postsecondary indicators are divided into two categories: P-measures for community

college credit-hour programs and A-measures for clock-hour programs, which are

offered at both community colleges and districts.

1P1, technical skill attainment, is the percentage of CTE credit hour concentrators who

either earned at least 75% of required program hours with a GPA of 2.5 or higher or

earned a certified credential through a third-party assessment. The clock-hour version of

this measure, 1A1, is the percentage of CTE clock-hour concentrators who either

achieved at least one OCP in a career certificate or advanced technology diploma

program or earned a certified credential through a third party assessment. The use of

occupational completion points, credit accumulation, and GPA as a validation of

technical skill attainment will be gradually phased out as the state moves toward third-

party assessments, particularly industry certifications, as more valid and reliable

measures of skill attainment.

2P1 and 2A1, completion, are the percentage of CTE concentrators who left

postsecondary education during the reporting year that completed their degree or

certificate program during the reporting year.

3P1 and 3A1, retention and transfer, measure the rate at which CTE concentrators from

the previous year, who did not complete their programs, remained enrolled in

postsecondary education in the reporting year. Students are counted in the numerator of

this measure if they remain enrolled in their original institution or if they transfer to any

2- or 4-year postsecondary institution.



Slide 42

4P1 and 4A1, student placement, measure the rate at which CTE concentrators who

completed their certificate or degree program in the previous year were placed in

postsecondary education, employment, or military service in the second quarter after

leaving postsecondary education. Placements are identified by matching student records

with FETPIP.

5P1 and 5A1, non-traditional participation, are the participation rate of CTE

concentrators of an underrepresented gender in programs that are traditionally

underrepresented by one gender or the other.

5P2 and 5A2 are the rate at which CTE concentrators of an underrepresented gender

completed their degree or certificate programs. Gender underrepresentation among

programs is determined by historical enrollment patterns.



Slide 43

The state has negotiated performance targets for three secondary accountability measures,

all based on current federal reporting requirements under the No Child Left Behind Act.

The 2008-09 targets for 1S1, 1S2, and 4S1 are 51%, 56%, and 71% respectively. Two

years of historical data were used in negotiations with the federal government.

Negotiations on performance targets for all remaining secondary and postsecondary

indicators will begin in March 2008.



Slide 44

Title Page for Kathleen Taylor, Senior Education Program Director



Slide 45

One of the other policy recommendations that has been incorporated into the plan has to

do with how Florida determines the split of funds between the Secondary sector and

Postsecondary sectors. States have discretion in making this determination as the law

does not legislate how this should be done.



Beginning July 1, 2008, Florida will allocate basic grant funds to career and technical

education programs based on the relative need in each sector: district secondary

programs, district postsecondary certificate programs, and community college certificate

and degree programs.



A three-year average FTE was calculated for the above categories. Annual sector

allocations may change based on changes in reported FTE. The average of 2004-2005,

2005-2006, and 2006-2007 was used to distribute basic grant funds for 2008-2009. This

is a significant change from Perkins III, which locked in the percentage allocation to

secondary (53%) and postsecondary (47%) sectors for all the program years of Perkins

III. The new funding distribution model in Perkins IV provides equity and awards funds

annually based on relative need and CTE activity in each sector. It is important to note

that adjustments may be made to this calculation based on the formula developed for

distribution of any reserve funds. Additional information regarding the overall sector

funding distribution model may be found in the 2008-2013 Perkins IV State Plan,

Appendix J.4 located on the Division of Workforce Education home page.



Slide 46

This chart can be found in appendix G.1 of the state plan and it delineates the percentage

allocation per sector for the 2008-2009 program year.



Slide 47

Here is an example of the formula used to make the calculations for each sector.

Slide 48

This chart was also discussed in conjunction with the previous slide.



Slide 49

While Perkins did not mandate the sector split of the allotment it does mandate how the

funds are distributed to secondary and postsecondary eligible recipients. These funds

must be distributed according to the formulas in sections 131 and 132



On the secondary side, the Act permits states to submit waivers for a more equitable

distribution. However, as detailed in the State Plan, Florida will distribute funds to

secondary eligible recipients according to prescribed formula based on population counts

in Section 131.



For 2008-2008, Florida used Census 2005 data from the U.S. Census Small Area Income

and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) to estimate the number of children in poverty and total

number of children ages 5 through 17, in each school district. Appendix G.2 of the state

plan details each secondary agency’s calculation and may be found on the Perkins IV

homepage.



Slide 50

On the postsecondary side funds are distributed based on each eligible agency’s

proportion of students enrolled in career and technical education who are economically

disadvantaged.

The prescribed formula in section 132 requires the allocation be based on the number of

individuals receiving federal Pell Grants and numbers of recipients of assistance from the

Bureau of Indian Affairs. The act permits states to submit a waiver that shows that the

prescribed formula does not send funds to institutions that have high numbers of

economically disadvantaged students.

As detailed in the state plan, The Division of Workforce Education will submit a

proposed alternative allocation formula for distribution of postsecondary career and

technical education programs to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education.

The alternative elements listed in this slide were determined to be the most valid and

reliable elements available for identification of institutions with the highest numbers of

economically disadvantaged students by the waiver guidelines of section 132 (B)

*In future program years, the Division of Workforce Education intends to add “recipients

of the Florida Student Assistance Grant” and “recipients of Florida Financial Aid Fees”

as additional elements to the proposed alternative postsecondary formula. These

elements are not being utilized in 2008-2009 as recipient data will not be available.

This concludes the major highlights in Florida’s Perkins IV State Plan. Thank you.



Slide 51

This slide is discussed in conjunction with the previous slide.



Slide 52

Title page for Gayle Manley, Senior Education Program Director

Slide 53

The information that is listed on this page is summarized in conjunction with the

following page.



Slide 54

One of the historic shifts in Perkins IV is that eligible recipients must offer programs of

study for interested Career and Technical Education (CTE) students. Now all CTE

students can benefit from voluntary enrollment in a program of study.

By consolidating the two separate delivery systems, the core elements of Tech Prep will

be infused into the statewide CTE system.

A consortium structure involving secondary and postsecondary partners as well as local

workforce boards and apprenticeship programs, when appropriate, are the mechanism to

facilitate seamless student transition from secondary programs to postsecondary

programs and into the workplace.



Slide 55

Section 122 of The Act describes the four core elements that comprise a program of

study.

1. Incorporates secondary education and postsecondary education elements.

2. Includes coherent and rigorous content aligned with challenging academic

standards and relevant career and technical content in a coordinated, non-

duplicative progression of courses that align secondary education with

postsecondary education.

3. May include the opportunity for secondary education students to participate in

dual or concurrent enrollment programs or other ways to acquire postsecondary

education credits.

4. Leads to an industry-recognized credential or certificate at the postsecondary

level, or an associate or baccalaureate degree.



Slide 56

Florida has developed additional requirements that must be met for a local program of

study.

1. A written articulation agreement must be in place for each Program of Study that

validates the career pathway.

2. The agreement must be signed and approved by the agency head of each

participating LEA.

3. The Program of Study will include the locally endorsed sequence of core

academic and CTE courses.

4. Career pathways must lead to a postsecondary credential. This may include a

certificate, diploma, associate or baccalaureate degree.

5. Each Program of Study is expected to be guided by the workforce and economic

needs of business, industry, the community and employment opportunities for

students.



Slide 57

The Application Narrative section has 8 sections that need responses.

In section Number 1, you will provide information on your new consortium. You will

designate who the chairperson is and list each partner and the amount each partner is

contributing to the consortium.

We will use the information that you provide in Section 2 to determine how many local

programs of study will be converted to the state template during this program year. This

negotiation will occur between FLDOE and the consortium chairperson.

In section 3, we have provided a chart that will assist you as you identify existing CTE

programs to convert to the state template.



Slide 58

4A. You will provide the Operation Plan for the Consortium. You may use consortium

funds to employ the chairperson or other personnel to assist with the development and

implementation of the Programs of Study.

4B. In this section, you will describe the roles and responsibilities of the fiscal agent,

including the process for distribution of funds among partners and how the fiscal agent

will monitor and evaluate components.

4C. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) will need to be submitted from each

partner. That MOU will describe how partner funds will collectively meet consortium

objectives and how the partners will release their individual funds to the fiscal agent.



Slide 59

Information provided in sections 5, 6, 7, and 8 are common requirements included in

each Perkins application.



Slide 60

Florida has allocated over two million dollars from our reserve fund to support the Career

Pathways Consortia effort. Eligible applicants for these funds are consortia that are

comprised of, at a minimum, one secondary LEA and one postsecondary LEA. There

might be multiple districts or multiple community colleges and district technical centers

that comprise the new Career Pathways Consortia. You will be listing the partners in the

application, and applications are due on May 30th.

We look forward to receiving your applications and we will review how consortia will

implement Programs of Study and Career Pathways to assist students as they transition

through the educational systems.



Slide 61

Title page for Doreen DuMond, Program Manager



Slide 62

• There are nine funding categories. You will go to the Workforce Education

Funding Opportunities website and download the appropriate application for your

agency’s grant type.

• Your response to the application will serve as your agency’s required 5-year plan;

the state will not have the latitude to excuse any eligible recipient from this

requirement.

• We will begin this presentation will a focus on the Perkins Secondary and

Postsecondary applications.

• We will also address the guidelines and requirements for all the other funding

categories.



Slide 63

In order to complete the application, you must have read these essential resources:

The Official Guide to the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006

published by the Association for Career and Technical Education.



The State Plan emphasizes the new directions for career and technical education and

major themes in the Act.

The provisions that eligible recipients must adhere to are clearly outlined in Florida’s

outstanding Implementation Guide

The State Plan, Implementation Guide and all of the 2008-2009 applications can be found

on the Workforce Education Funding Opportunities website.



Slide 64

Both Florida’s state plan and five year plans by local eligible recipients are required

under the law. Due to the 5-year plan requiring a comprehensive internal review, it is

recommended that all grants be submitted by the due date so that funds can be made

available by July 1.



However, for the Department of Juvenile Justice applications, because it is a competitive

process, the applications must be date stamped in the Office of Grants Management by

May 30, 2008.



Slide 65

When you read the Act, please pay careful attention to the definitions in section three.

You must be aware that funds made available under this Act shall supplement and not

supplant, non-federal funds.

There must be documentation of the maintenance of effort which must be kept at the

local level and must be auditable.

Eligible recipients shall not use more than five percent of the funds for administrative

costs. Please remember that positions such as project coordinator, accountant, clerical

staff, or other positions not directly serving students are considered administrative and

that indirect costs are considered administrative costs.

All Perkins requirements are clearly detailed the applications and Business Rules.

All allocation formulas can be found in the State Plan.



Slide 66

Part A of the Narrative is your opportunity to briefly describe how these funds will be

used to support the nine required career and technical education activities.

In the application, a chart for entering your responses, is provided for your use. As you

enter the description of how the career and technical education programs will be carried

out, the chart will expand to ensure that you have adequate space to address each item.



It is very important that expenditures on the DOE 101 Budget Narrative Form correlate

with your responses to the Project Design Narrative.



Slide 67

After the “Required Uses of Funds” are described, Perkins IV funds may be used for 20

permissible activities which are detailed in Part B. You must provide the number (and

letter if applicable) of the permissive use of funds, a short title, and a brief description of

the activities that will be carried out.

You will find an in-depth description of the nine required and the 20 Permissive uses of

funds in the Attachments section.



Here again, please note the importance correlating the expenditures that you will list on

the DOE 101 Budget Narrative Form with your responses to the required and permissible

uses of funds.



Slide 68

Eligible recipients must briefly describe how the career and technical education activities

will be carried out with respect to meeting state and local adjusted levels of performance.

These local adjusted levels of performance are contingent upon the availability of the

data which will become available at a later date.

At this time, performance targets for Florida are pending approval from the U.S. Office

of Vocational and Adult Education. All eligible recipients will receive, under separate

cover, not included in the RFA, individualized Perkins IV performance core indicator

data for their agency with improvement targets identified.



You must provide the contact information for the person who will be authorized to

negotiate local adjusted performance levels with FLDOE. For information on the

performance indicators, please refer to Florida’s definitions of “participants” and

“concentrators” in the Perkins IV Implementation Guide.



Slide 69

Eligible recipients must briefly describe how they will offer the appropriate courses of

not less than one CTE program of study described in Section 122 of the Act.

For this requirement, there are two options; you must choose either Option #1 or Option

#2 from the chart provided.



Slide 70

Option #1 requires that the eligible recipient join a Career Pathway Consortium and

allocate a 1.5% minimum of the basic grant funds to support consortium activities.

The consortium will carry out the Program of Study requirements identified in the

Perkins IV Implementation Guide. Under this option, eligible recipients must provide the

following information:

basic grant amount allocated to support Career Pathway Consortium,

percentage of support,

the name of the consortium,

list consortium members, and the

consortium contact person, including email address and telephone number.

All of this information is provided in the Secondary and Postsecondary applications.



Slide 71

Under Option #2, the eligible recipient will elect not to join a Career Pathway

Consortium and will allocate a minimum of 3% of the basic grant funds to individually

carry out the Program of Study requirements identified in the Perkins IV Implementation

Guide.



Under this option, there are two requirements:

1. the eligible recipient must first convert a negotiated percentage of existing local level

programs of study to the state template as detailed in the Perkins IV Implementation

Guide. Please use the state template located at the Workforce Education website.

Eligible recipients must attach a list of all programs of study.



2. The next requirement under Option #2 is that eligible recipients convert a negotiated

percentage of local CTE programs offered into a Program of Study using the state

template. In addition, those choosing Option #2 must also respond to four additional

questions and complete a chart indicating existing career and technical programs that the

eligible recipient has prioritized for conversion to the Program of Study State Required

Template. The FLDOE shall use the required supplemental responses to determine the

negotiated percentage.



Slide 72

Also in Section 3, please provide a brief description of how the program will address:

• Strengthening the relationship between core academic and career and

technical education programs;

• Students’ experience in - and understanding of - business and industry;

• How career and technical education programs will teach the same coherent

and rigorous content as other areas; and

• How career and technical students at the secondary level will be

encouraged to enroll in challenging academic subjects





Slide 73

eligible recipients who chose to address Permissive items 4 – 18 will briefly address

items such as:

(4)How comprehensive professional development will be carried out?

(5)How you are getting your stakeholders involved?

(6)How your agency will provide Assurances of size, scope and quality.

(7) How will you use data to continuously evaluate and improve program performance?

(10) How will students, including special populations, be prepared for non-traditional

occupations?

(13) You will need to describe Partnerships with local charter schools that offer career

and technical education programs.

(14) If yours is a consortium project, what process will be used to ensure that funds

utilized for programs are mutually beneficial for all consortium members?

(15) You must provide a list of names and addresses of the sites where programs,

services, and activities will be offered; and list the Classification of Instructional

Programs number and title of the programs under which these activities or services will

be provided.

(18) For automotive service technology programs, you will be required to provide

documentation of industry certification or evidence that the certification is in process.

There are a few other Narrative Requirements for all applications that will be outlined

toward the end of the presentation.



Slide 74

Title page for Doreen DuMond, Program Manager



Slide 75

With regard to Career Pathways Consortia Guidelines, each consortium partner must

provide a Memorandum of Understanding that specifies:



How the partner’s funds will support the activities of the consortium,

The procedure for the release of the partner’s funds to the fiscal agent, and

Each consortium member must provide a separate DOE 101, Budget Narrative Form.



Slide 76

The fiscal agent will designate a chairperson who may or may not be employed by the

fiscal agent.

The application must include the roles and responsibilities of the fiscal agent, chairperson

and partners of the consortium,

The process for the distribution of funds among the partners of the consortium, and

A description of the implementation, monitoring and evaluation components of the

Career Pathways Consortium



Slide 77

Eligible recipients are required to convert a negotiated percentage of existing local level

Programs of Study to the state template which is located at the Workforce Education

Funding Opportunities website.

(a) The Articulation agreement information for each Program of Study that is

established and validated is defined in Section 3, subsection 4 of the Act.

(b) All articulation agreements must be signed and approved by the agency head of

each participating secondary and postsecondary eligible recipient.

(c) A Program of Study must include a locally endorsed sequence of core academic

and career and technical courses from Grade 9 through the postsecondary

component of the Program of Study.

(d) A post secondary credential may include a certificate, diploma, associate or

baccalaureate degree, industry certification or licensure.

(e) Each Program of Study is expected to be guided by the workforce and economic

development needs of business and industry, the community and employment

opportunities for students.



Slide 78

Eligible recipients must also convert a negotiated percent of

“stand alone” local CTE Programs offered by consortium partners.

You will note that the detailed requirements are the same as those for Requirement #1.

The requirements for the conversion are clearly outlined in the Perkins IV

Implementation Guide and the state template is located at the Workforce Education

Funding Opportunities website



Slide 79

In the instructions for completing Career Pathways Consortia Narrative, you will see the

following:



For innovative initiatives, eligible recipients may pool a portion of funds with a portion

of funds available to not less than 1 other eligible recipient. Members who elect to

participate in a Consortium must each contribute a 1.5% minimum of their Title 1 Basic

Grant funds to support the consortium activities and carry out the Program of Study

Requirements.



You must also provide the Name of the Consortium, Consortium Chairperson and contact

information.

For the negotiated percentage of Programs of Study, we will need to know:

how many programs have already been developed?

of those, how many have used the state template?

how many have not been converted to the state template?

and how many do you propose for conversion?



Slide 80

You will need to identify the existing CTE programs prioritized for conversion, using the

chart in the application which will include if the program is identified as High Skill, High

Wage or High Demand and if the program is part of a local articulation agreement.



Slide 81

With regard to the Operation Plan, you will see 2 sections:

Roles and responsibilities of the fiscal agent, chairperson and consortium partners,

Process for the distribution of funds among the partners of the consortium,

A description of the implementation, monitoring and evaluation components of the

Career Pathways Consortium, and

Each member must provide a MOU that specifies how the partner’s funds will support

consortium activities and procedures for the release of funds.

Slide 82

Consortium activities may include:

Curriculum development and alignment,

Consortium meetings with secondary, postsecondary and community partners,

Information sessions for students, parents, counselors, teachers, faculty and community

groups,

Career development activities, tools, resources, strategies and materials, and

Data collection and analysis to focus on program assessment and improvement, student

performance outcomes, teaching and learning, and seamless transitioning from secondary

to postsecondary environments.



Slide 83

Florida elected to allocate a portion of reserve funds to aid programs in rural and sparsely

populated areas. Rural areas are defined by the state and documented by the Rural

Economic Development Initiative, known as REDI. REDI counties are updated

periodically, and maybe be viewed at the website provided.

Rural and Sparsely Populated Career and Technical Education Programs are funded only

in conjunction with eligible recipients of Secondary or Postsecondary projects. As such,

a 5-year plan requirement would have been a duplication of effort for a Rural and

Sparsely Populated program; therefore, the requirement was waived. These projects must,

however, adhere to the requirements of Secondary and Postsecondary Programs.

Rural counties are funded according to the relative share of the Florida Labor Force

population as measured by Florida’s Labor Market Statistics’ Local Area Unemployment

Statistics Report; these data represent the number of potential working age population in

the county.

No rural and sparsely populated county will receive less than $25,000. The remainder of

the funds are distributed proportionally.



Slide 84

• Start with a careful review of the application. Eligible recipients must focus on

high skill, high wage and/or high demand occupations and must address at least 2

of the 4 priority areas:

• (1) Distance Learning, (2) Information Technology, (3) Priorities of the Regional

Workforce Board, and (4) Student and/or Instructor Industry Certification



Slide 85

Eligible recipients will also need to describe how the prioritized areas checked in the

previous section will focus on: objectives, services, activities and name the source for

determining High-Wage, High Skill and or High Demand Occupations. The statewide or

regional Targeted Occupations List must be used to indentify these careers.



Slide 86

• Determining whether the school district, community college or both will apply for

the allocation is a local decision.

• Letters of Agreement between the school district and community college

servicing that district (with original signatures by the agencies heads) must be

included in the application package.

• There are 3 Letter(s) of Agreement Options:

• A school district may apply for the total county allocation,

• A community college may apply for the total county allocation;

community colleges may apply for funds from any county that is included

in its’ service area, or

• School districts and the community college may wish to split the funds. In

this instance, separate applications on separate forms must be submitted.



Slide 87

As with basic Perkins Grants, the funding purpose of the University Developmental

Research Schools is to develop more fully the academic and career and technical skills of

secondary education students who elect to enroll in career and technical education

programs.



Slide 88

University Developmental Research Schools must write a 5-year plan. For this

requirement, the application narrative will follow the same basic Perkins format with

regard to:

Required and Permissive uses of funds,

Providing the information of the person authorized to negotiate your agency’s Local

Adjusted Performance Levels with the DOE,

Using the state template found in the Perkins IV Implementation Guide for converting a

negotiated percentage of existing local level Programs of Study to the state template and

a percentage of local CTE programs offered into a Program of Study using the state

template,

Stakeholder Involvement,

Size, Scope and Quality,

For Consortium Projects, describing the process used by the consortium to ensure that

funds are utilized for the purposes and programs that are mutually beneficial,

Providing a list of the names and addresses of the site or sites where programs, services,

and activities will be offered, and

Providing a list of the Classification of Instructional Programs numbers and titles of the

programs under which these activities or services will be provided.

Your agency will be held to the secondary local performance indicators.





Slide 89

The funding purpose for the Florida School for the Deaf and Blind is the same as that for

the basic Perkins grants with the target population of Secondary Career and Technical

students enrolled at the Florida School for the Deaf and Blind.



Slide 90

A 5-year must be written and the narrative will follow the same format as previously

addressed:

Everything from the Required and Permissive uses of funds, and providing the

information for a person authorized to negotiate your agency’s Local Adjusted

Performance Levels, through

Providing a list of the Classification of Instructional Programs numbers and titles of the

programs under which these activities or services must be provided.

Here again, your agency will be held to the secondary local performance indicators.



Slide 91

The State Leadership Application for State Correctional Institutions and Institutions that

Serve Individuals with Disabilities also follows the same format as basic Perkins grant

applications.



This grant will serve incarcerated and institutionalized Career and Technical Education

students.



Slide 92

Here again the application narrative requirements follow the same basic Perkins format

with regard to:

Required and Permissive uses of funds,

Contact information for the person who will negotiate your agency’s Local Adjusted

Performance Levels with the DOE,

Using the state template,

Stakeholder Involvement, and other requirements.



Slide 93

Only the local school districts will apply for the funds and are responsible for serving

students.

The funding purpose for the Secondary Career and Technical Programs for Department

of Juvenile Justice students, in addition to developing more fully the academic, career,

and technical skills of secondary students has the added focus in implementing new, or

improving existing, non-traditional career and technical education programs leading to

industry certification.



This application does not have a requirement for negotiating local adjusted performance

levels because the school district is responsible for all secondary performance indicators.



This will be a Competitive process and all the requirements are clearly detailed in the

application. As a competitive process, the May 30 date must be adhered to and NO

applications will be considered after that date.



Slide 94

There are seven requirements of the narrative that will be scored; all are completely

detailed in the application.

The standard scoring criteria are based on a 100 point scale, with a minimum score of 70

points is required for an application to be considered eligible for funding.



Slide 95

The Project Abstract or Summary will briefly describe the general purpose, specific

goals, program design and significance.

The Project Need will describe supporting data as evidence for the program including the

magnitude or severity of the problem, that the need for services is apparent, that the

project focuses services on the target population including those with the greatest needs.

Your agency will need to explain any gaps or weaknesses in service and use supportive

data to justify the need for the proposed services and activities.

The project Design and Implementation will describe measurable objectives, activities,

and timelines specific to the integration of academic, career and technical instruction, and

the links from secondary to postsecondary education.

The Evaluation section will describe the instruments and methods to be used for

evaluating the proposed project.

Your proposal must address one or more of the State Board of Education Strategic

Imperatives.

The Dissemination Plan will describe the methods used to disseminate and share

information about the proposed project.

As with all applications, proposed costs in the narrative must be correlated with the

budget narrative.



Slide 96

Here are the other required forms that were referred to earlier. They can be found in the

Attachments section:



The Service Delivery Form shows the information that is tracked by the program

manager. This form is for your information; there is nothing for you to fill out or change.

Simply include it in the application package.

The Required and Permissive uses of funds that have been discussed are detailed here.

The Regional Workforce Board Coordination Assurance Form (if applicable) verifies

that the eligible recipient has provided the local Workforce Board with a copy of the

application. Local Workforce Boards may submit comments regarding the application to

the Division of Workforce Education’s Office of Grants Administration.

There is a Size, Scope and Quality Programmatic Requirements Chart and an

example in the attachments. We will need to know:

How programs provide opportunities for CTE Concentrators and how programs align

with business and/or industry,

What are the opportunities for students to earn an industry certification and/or licensure?

What opportunities shall be provided for students who participate in programs that lead to

high skill, high wage and high demand occupations? And

How will your agency ensure that academics are an integral component of all programs?

We have discussed the local adjusted levels of performance and you will see the

Florida’s Perkins IV Performance Measures chart.

Slide 97

The Allocation Charts list each eligible recipient’s individual allocation as well as the

overall total.

The DOE 100A, Project Application Form must have an original signature.

The DOE 101 Budget Narrative Form must provide a detailed description of the items

and services

For every line item provide these descriptors: who, what, for whom, where,

quantity, when, performance measure and number identifying Required or

Permissive use of funds.

You can use as many Budget Narrative Forms as necessary to list your items; if there is

more than one page, please put the total award amount on the last page and double check

to ensure that it is the same amount as on the 100A.

The new Equipment Form is found in the Attachments,

and the Application Review Criteria and Checklist. On the checklist, please read the

instructions at the top of the page; you will be required to number the pages of your

application and submit the documents in the order indicated.



Slide 98

• The DOE Form 100A represents a formal agreement between the local agency

head or his or her designee to adhere or comply to the general, administrative,

programmatic and fiscal assurance of the application.

• Please be sure to download and complete the correct RFA for your type of

program.

• The 100A provided with the application should display the correct TAPS number-

this is a Grants Management Tracking Number.

In the event that the Agency Head is not available to sign the DOE 100A, your agency

will need to submit a letter, on official letterhead stationary, designating an alternate

individual who is authorized to sign the form.



Slide 99

The DOE 101 will reflect all the proposed costs for your program. Carefully read the

instructions on page 2.

• Enter the name of the eligible recipient.

• School Districts must enter both function and object codes.

• Colleges enter only the object codes.

• All line items should provide account titles.

• Not more than 5% may be used for Administrative Costs which includes Indirect

Costs.



Slide 100

Here are some examples of budget items. Under Salaries and Other personal services

remember to include the projected number of FTEs.

Personal Services include compensation paid to persons on temporary appointment. This

includes substitute teachers who are not under written contract. In this instance, be sure

to describe the service to be provided, show the number of hours that will be worked, and

state the hourly rate.

Administrative cost includes indirect cost which will be at the negotiated rate.

Here again, for every line item, please include a justification that is reasonable and

clearly explained.



Slide 101

• We would like to emphasize the new budget supplemental form this year called

the “Detailed Projected and Purchased Equipment Form.” This new form is

intended to assist eligible recipients with not only projecting equipment

purchases, but also with the internal controls needed to manage and locate

property that is acquired with Federal Funds.



• This slide shows the items on the top of the form indicating the items

PROJECTED to be purchased.



Slide 102

• This slide shows the items on the second half of the form where you will list the

items ACTUALLY purchased.



• Please read the detailed instructions on page 2.



• This form, complete with actual equipment purchases, will be submitted with

your FA399.



Slide 103

Here are Narrative requirements that are common to all Perkins applications.

• How the proposed project will incorporate reading initiatives and one or more of

the Florida State Board of Education strategic imperatives.

• The disseminating and marketing plan will need to show how your agency will

share information on the services you provide with the target population for your

grant.

• The General Education Provisions Act – which we refer to as GEPA - is a law

that requires applicants to describe how they will ensure equitable access to and

participation in federally funded programs for students, teachers and other

program beneficiaries with special needs.

• In accordance with federal law, the eligible recipients must provide a detailed

plan of action for providing consultation for equitable services to private school

children and teachers within the local education agency’s service area.

• Websites for the Strategic Imperatives, GEPA, and Equitable Services for Private

School Participation are listed in the application.



Slide 104

We strongly recommend that when you access the template at the website, you save the

blank template to your computer or a disk before entering your responses. Please keep

your responses brief, clear and please use a 12 point font.

A considerable amount of time and energy has been devoted to the development of this

year’s RFAs and RFP and we ask that you follow the format as it has been presented.

There are many individuals at the DOE who review the applications and our ability to do

the necessary review in a consistent manner will ensure that your agency’s application

can be moved forward with a recommendation for approval as soon as possible.



Slide 105

Here are the primary source documents the FLDOE uses as regulatory guides for

administering projects. Local grant administrators are strongly encouraged to access and

become familiar with these resources.



Slide 106

• To stay abreast of the latest funding opportunities within the Division of

Workforce Education, we encourage you to frequently visit our website. Various

updates including Roll Forward information are posted at this location.

• The Paperless communication registration is an excellent source of FLDOE

information. Upon registration you may be assured to receive all of the latest

departmental updates.

• We often get questions regarding where to find a particular form such as Project

Amendment Form 150 or Budget Amendment Form 151. Here is the web link to

the Project Application and Amendment Procedures for Federal and State

Programs, also known as the Green Book - the source for all of the required

forms.



Slide 107

This map provides you with all of the Division of Workforce Education Office of Grants

Administration Staff. You now have the name, telephone number and email address for

the program manager who serves your specific region.



Slide 108

Title page for Eileen Amy, Director of Compliance



Slide 109

The development, design and implementation of a strong risk-based Quality Assurance

System is a priority for the Division of Workforce Education.

Our commitment is to ensure that

1. Services are being provided according to the terms of the grant.

2. The accountability of funds is transparent throughout the life of the grant.



Slide 110

The Role of Quality Assurance is to

I. Assure financial accountability –

Are funds being spent as planned and approved in the grant?

Are funds being spent according to guidelines in the law and OMB Circulars?

Are funds being spent to provide the agreed-upon services for the appropriate students

II. Program Quality

As we consider applications for grants and contracts, we consider the intent of the grantee

to provide excellent program quality.

The ability to demonstrate strong performance on the indicators; the ability to put into

place systems and processes that support quality will be given full attention as we review

programs



III. Regulatory compliance

The law is the law. We are committed to ensuring that the implementation of grants are

in compliance with the applicable federal laws and regulations, state statutes and rules,

and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars. Compliance monitoring is

a key component of the Quality Assurance System.



Slide 111

As required by law, the Division of Workforce Education is responsible to ensure that

providers are accountable for the funds received.



It is the intent of the Quality Assurance System and staff that we work collaboratively

with providers to ensure the identification and correction of any non-compliance issues;

work with the provider and program staff to ensure that performance indicators are being

met at the level established by the program.



Through the identification of specific areas requiring attention, targeted technical

assistance may be provided by the grantee, staff of the Department or other appropriate

parties.



If either non-compliance or under-performance is identified, the expectation is that

providers will engage in continuous improvement strategies to reach the desired level of

performance.



As a result of this way of work, positive systemic change can occur.



Slide 112

The Division of Workforce Education is committed to the inclusion of stakeholders in the

development and implementation of the Quality Assurance System. Over time the

system will be strengthened as feedback is solicited and the implementation activities

take place.



Stakeholders include various participants such as representatives of school districts,

colleges and universities, community colleges, community/faith-based organizations,

students and families, and Workforce Education staff. Using the expertise of all of these

parties, the Quality Assurance System will be integrated statewide.



An Advisory Committee will be convened to be representative of the stakeholders. This

committee will:

• assist in review of data and trends

• contribute to the enhancement and revision of the system

• identify systemic issues requiring technical assistance.



Focus Groups composed of various stakeholders may be convened to address single topic

issues



Slide 113

The use of data is essential to the implementation of the Quality Assurance System.

In order to complete the Risk Assessment process, the Bureau reviews three sets of data:

1. the Level of Performance on the key performance indicators

2. Operational risk factors which may include such factors as: follow power point

a. Total amount of agency funding from grants

b. Number of grants awarded to the agency

c. Number of years of experience

d. Amount of unexpended funds

e. Previous audit or monitoring findings

f. Key organizational changes

g. Etc.

3. Critical factors are identified through discussions with Division staff and grant

materials records. Such factors may include staff turnover, timeliness of reporting

and responses to inquiries; history of amendments; observations, etc.



Each area has certain criteria which has a specific value and is prioritized and weighted

to determine the level of risk for agencies.



Slide 114

Monitoring strategies are those activities that may be used to monitor agencies.

Monitoring strategies may take place on-site or off-site at any time during the year.



Once a Risk Assessment is completed, agencies are assessed on level of performance,

operational risk factors, and other critical factors. This process results in ratings which

are tiered. Certain monitoring strategies may fall into specific tiers.



Monitoring strategies include such activities as phone calls and videoconferencing,

records review (desk top reviews), system improvement plans, self-assessments, or on-

site visits, etc.. The strategies to be used for each provider are dependent upon the level

of risk assigned as a result of the Risk Assessment.



On-site visits focus on those agencies with a higher level of risk.



One or more monitoring strategies may be used.



Slide 115

Upon completion of the Risk Assessment process, the results may indicate the need for

an on-site monitoring visit.

Notice will be given to the Agency Head. The activities of the monitoring visit may

include:

1. Entrance conference with agency representatives

2. Interviews with administrative and finance staff, instructors, students and families

3. Observations of classes and events

4. Records review, both programmatic and fiscal

5. Surveys may be conducted, if appropriate

6. An exit conference will be held to identify any issues or concerns



Slide 116

Self Assessment

A self assessment tool is being developed to correspond to the regulatory requirements.

Agencies may be required to complete the full instrument on a routine basis as

determined by the Division; or complete the total or partial tool as directed and

depending on the level of risk assigned to the agency.

Self assessment enables the agency to identify and correct or improve areas essential to

the compliance and quality of its services.



Correspondence and Reporting

Guidelines for correspondence and reporting will be provided to the agencies.

Communication and timely responses between the Division and the agency are

significant elements in this process.



Slide 117

Resolution Activities

As monitoring activities progress, agencies may be required to develop and implement a

System Improvement Plan to address performance indicators.



Corrective Action Plans are developed and implemented to address areas of non-

compliance.

Such plans require the identification of strategies that will be used to improve the areas of

concern.

Evidence of change is identified and dates of completion will be required.



It is the responsibility of the Division to track the resolution activities to ensure timely

responses and the eventual closure of the agencies’ monitoring activity.



Enforcement activities will be identified and administered when appropriate.

It is important to review and evaluate the Division’s systems in addition to the monitoring

processes put in place. Continuous improvement of procedures and processes is relevant

and important to all participants.



Slide 118

The design, development, implementation, revision and evaluation of a Quality

Assurance System will benefit providers and all of our stakeholders.

We encourage your participation in this process.



Feedback and questions may be address to Eileen Amy, Director of Compliance



Slide 119

I encourage you to send your inquiries and your recommendations to the following email

address perkins2008@fldoe.org. Again, let me thank you for your participation in the

Perkins IV State Plan and Thank You again for all you do for Florida’s career and

technical education students.


Related docs
Other docs by HC111111062715
CDER Handbook
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
SRH_HIV_AIDS2008_keywords2
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
NEWS00710_all
Views: 116  |  Downloads: 0
annrpt_0203
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
NonJournalSourceList
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
9 19
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
State 20Licensure 20Requirements
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
front
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Enews_2004
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Book 20Listing
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!