land grant
Document Sample


The Land Grant College
With Commentary from Kemp P. Battle (President
of the University of North Carolina, 1876-1891)
and Leonidas L. Polk (President, National Farmers
Alliance, Populist Party Founder, NC Grange
Leader, Commissioner of Agriculture and Founder
of the Progressive Farmer Magazine)
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Colleges - 1860
Less than 3% of the
400 Colleges had
350
Departments of
300
Science. The emphasis
was on the liberal arts.
250
200
150
100
50
0
No Science Science
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Background Information
1851 - Jonathan Baldwin Turner of Illinois
proposed a new model for higher education.
He said there were:
Two classes of people
• Well-to-do people
Universities
• Industrial Classes
No university
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Background Information
Turner’s Industrial University Plan (1851)
Experimental Farm
Lectures would be held during cold weather
all types of livestock and crops
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Turner’s Plan (1851)
Dormitories and buildings
Commencement to be like a fair
Funding to come from the Central Government
Designed for the industrial classes
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Turner
Advocated federal land grants to support
such universities (1852)
Convinced Representative Yates of Illinois
to introduce a Bill into Congress (1854)
Yates was defeated
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Senator Justin Morrill (Vt.)
Introduced a resolution to Congress in 1856
to establish a national agricultural college
(like the naval academy)
Resolution failed
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Morrill Bill
Turner sends all his land grant information
and ideas to Morrill
Morrill introduces land grants acts in 1857,
1858 and 1859
1859 bill passes both houses but is vetoed.
Southerners were opposed to the bill because it
infringed on state rights. President Buchanan
was concerned that Southerners might secede if
he signed the bill.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Morrill Act
1862 - Morrill Act finally enacted
(however, North Carolina had seceded from
the Union and was not eligible to receive
the benefits of the act)
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Morrill Act of 1862
Gave federal lands to each state to sell to
support the establishment of a college
States received 30,000 acres per senator and
representative in Congress
If no public lands were left in the state, land
in other states (generally out west) was
given to states to sell in the form of “land
scrip”
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Morrill Act of 1862
The money generated from the sale of lands
was to be invested and the income
generated was to support the college.
Funds could not be used to build buildings.
It was expected the state would furnish this.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Morrill Act - Purpose
“to the endowment, support, and maintenance of at
least one college where the leading object shall be,
without excluding other scientific and classical
studies and including military tactics, to teach
such branches of learning as are related to
agriculture and the mechanic arts...in order to
promote the liberal and practical education of the
industrial classes in the several pursuits and
professions in life.”
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Morrill Act - Accountability
“An annual report shall be made regarding
the progress of each college, recording any
improvements and experiments made, with
their costs and results, and such other
matters, including State industrial and
economical statistics, as may be supposed
useful; ...one copy to the Secretary of the
Interior”
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
In North Carolina
1866 The state of North Carolina accepts the
provisions of the Morrill Act
The land script was sold for 50¢ an acre (generated
$125,000)
The money was invested as follows:
• North Carolina Railroad State bonds
• New State Bonds
• Special Tax Bonds
The investments soon failed. Within 2-3 years the
bonds were worthless.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
In North Carolina
1867 UNC was designated as the land-grant
college
1887 UNC was stripped of its land grant
status. The new North Carolina Agricultural
and Mechanical College in Raleigh was
designated as the land-grant college
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Role of the University
of North Carolina as the
Land-grant College
As viewed by Kemp P. Battle
President, University of North
Carolina, 1875-1891
(Note: this is my interpretation of what I think Battle would say. Most of the following is taken
verbatim from the History of the University of North Carolina. Volume II: From 1868 to 1912
written by Mr. Battle.)
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Background Information
1831-1919
Spent most of my life in Chapel Hill
and Raleigh
Graduate of the University of North
Carolina as was my father (1820) and
grandfather (1798)
Tutor at the institution
Lawyer
Planter
State Treasurer
Trustee of the College, on the Executive
Committee
President, North Carolina Agricultural
Society
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
In order to understand the
role of UNC and the land-
grant issue, a review of
past history is needed.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1776 - The constitution of North Carolina
stated “all useful learning shall be
encouraged in one or more universities”
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1789 - The University of North Carolina
was chartered.
1795 - The University opened its doors.
1795 - A professorship of chemistry and the
philosophy of medicine, agriculture and the
mechanical arts is established
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
Only state university to graduate students in the
18th century (1700s)
Finest classical education available
Greek and Latin instruction particularly strong
Young men from the best families in the South
attend.
Produces refined gentleman who are truly
educated
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
Graduates Graduates
Governors Judges
Cabinet Members Legislators
Clergymen President (James Polk
Diplomats (Many – elected from
foreign ambassadors) Tennessee) and Vice
President (William
Rufus King –
Alabama)
of the United States
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1815 - Natural Sciences were added
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1856 - Professor of agricultural chemistry
was employed (John Kimberly)
1860 - Only Yale has more students
1860-1865 - Unlike many southern
universities, the University did not close
during the Civil War
1866 – Kimberly leaves to farm in
Buncombe County
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1867 – Designated as the Land-grant
college, but received no money because of
bad investments on the part of the state
government
1870-1875 – Because of dire financial
problems and political issues, the University
is closed
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1875 – The state legislature agrees to provide the
interest on the land-grant funds to support the
reopening of the university ($7,500). This is the
only state funding we receive.
1876 – I am selected president and undertake to
reestablish and reorganize the university
A College of Agriculture is established
Kimberly rejoins the university as the Chair of
Agriculture
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1875-76 Kimberly has three recitations a
week on physical geography with more
classes to be added when agricultural
students come.
At first there was only one Agricultural
student, but after awhile four others joined
him. There was a general impression that
the department was and would be a failure
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1876-77 - Professor Kimberly was voted $200 for
his department. Mr. Kimberly was nearly as lavish
in his requests as Professor Redd. He had been
teaching in the basement of Smith Hall, the old
laboratory. He asked for $1,500 to remove to the
New East Building and $1,300 for the purchase of
various utensils. As he resigned his professorship
no action was taken, though $200 was voted to his
department.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1876 - As it was absolutely essential to deal fairly
with the Land Grant appropriation I arranged to
visit the following universities:
• Tuft's College at Boston
• The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
• The Sheffield Scientific School under control of Yale
University
• The Wesleyan University
• Williams College
• The New Jersey Agricultural and Mechanical College under
the charge of Rutgers College,
• The Agricultural and Mechanical College of Virginia at
Blacksburg (this visit was later)
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1876 - To strengthen the teaching in the branches relating to
Agriculture and the Mechanic Arts William H. Smith of
Michigan, a Doctor of Philosophy, was employed as Professor
of Natural History.
He proved to be a teacher of decided merit, quite an
accomplished expert in his department.
A pamphlet was prepared by him for general distribution
instructing in the art of taxidermy. It contained minute
directions, such as had never been given before in this State, for
skinning and preserving the skins, feathers and eggs of birds and
mammals,
For personal reasons Professor Smith resigned in the spring of
1877.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
In the fall of 1876 the executive committee of the
State Grange made inquiries of me as to the work of
the Agricultural Department.
My response quieted criticism for nearly ten years. It
follows on the next slide.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
My response
After reciting the Act of Congress I called attention to the catalogue
which showed that the "branches relating to Agriculture and the
Mechanic Arts" had especial attention. "For example, Chemistry,
including the composition and analysis of soils, manure, etc.; Botany,
Zoölogy, including domestic animals and their foes; Geology,
including character of soils; Mineralogy, especially the minerals of our
State; Mechanics, including agricultural implements; Physics, light and
heat as influencing plant life; also Meteorology; Engineering,
including road making, land surveying, etc.; Mathematics necessary
for Mechanics, Engineering, etc. All this is in addition to the English
Language and Literature, Political Economy, Constitutional and
International Law, and the Greek and Latin and the German and
French languages needed to make our students intelligent citizens."
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
A New Need
I became impressed with the evidence that our
farmers suffer immense losses in the use of
fertilizers: first, in buying the kind of fertilizers
that the crops do not need; and second, in being
defrauded by the manufacturer or the middleman,
or both.
I made speeches at fairs and at many other
appropriate places about this problem.
I, along with a committee of four others,
approached the state legislature about the problem.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Agricultural Experiment
Station
In 1877 the state legislature responded by
establishing an Agricultural Experiment Station at
the University.
Albert R. Ledoux, of New York City, a Doctor of
Philosophy (Ph.D.) of Columbia University and of
Goettingen, a most capable chemist and judicious
man of business, was elected to head up the
Experiment Station.
All fertilizers sold in the state were tested.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Agricultural Experiment
Station
Bulletins were prepared and sent to farmers
Insects were identified
Dr. Ledoux left in 1880 and was replaced by
Charles W. Dabney, Jr., a Doctor of Philosophy of
Goettingen
In 1881 an Agriculture Building to house the state
Board of Agriculture was erected in Raleigh and
the Experiment Station was moved to that new
location.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1881 – We were assailed for not having stables
and barns and blooded cattle, for not having
workshops and costly machinery, and the like
plants necessary to the efficiency of a complete
institute of technology. The answer is plain. In the
first place, how is it possible to provide these
expenditures, running into many thousands of
dollars, out of $7,500 a year? Could the ablest
financier provide for the demands on his budget to
this extent out of an empty treasury--in truth out of
a deficient treasury?
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1881 – The Act of Congress does not allow
buildings to be put up out of the fund, or cattle or
machinery bought. It requires the teaching of Latin
and Greek and also the "branches of learning
relating to Agriculture and the Mechanic Arts,"
not "Agriculture and the Mechanic Arts." The
farmer's son should have a general training, so that
he can hold his own in all circles. It is the intent of
the Act to elevate the business of the farmers and
mechanics to take rank with the professional men
of law, medicine, theology and the like.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The University
1881 - It is possible that if the Trustees had cut off
from its past and turned the University into an
Agricultural and Mechanical College, the General
Assembly would have shown greater liberality.
But they wisely determined to develop it along the
ancient lines, embracing, however, a much greater
scope of scientific teaching. Surely it was right to
have our institution of the type of Harvard, Yale,
Princeton, Columbia, University of Virginia, a
character that this University has always had, with
a reputation wide and enduring.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
President’s Report to
the Trustees - 1887
The interest under these laws [Morrill Act] is to be used
not for farm experiments nor building barns and silos, not
for erecting workshops or purchase of stock and
machinery, but for teaching (1) the classics, (2) scientific
studies generally, (3) military tactics, (4) branches relating
to Agriculture, (5) branches relating to the Mechanic Arts:
that is, not ploughing and hoeing, nor planing and sawing,
but the scientific principles leading to the trades, not the
trades themselves. After the student has mastered the
branches of learning leading to all the pursuits of life then
let him on farm or in workshop, as in a great polytechnic
school, learn the skill of hand and practical details of his
chosen business.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Winds of Change
1887 - A formidable crusade was made, mainly by
the eloquence of Colonel Leonidas L. Polk, former
Commissioner of Agriculture, to take from the
University the $7,500 Land Grant and give it to a
new institution organized for the more practical
education of the sons of farmers and mechanics
than could be given at the University. Colonel
Polk was possessed of a style of speaking very
acceptable to his hearers and he had plausible
ground for a new move.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Winds of Change
It was generally known that many States had
concluded that cattle breeding, garden and orchard
culture and the like could not well be gained in
institutions like Harvard, Princeton, the
Universities of North Carolina and Virginia, and
had established separate colleges. Of course in his
speeches he minimized unjustly the laboratory
work of the University, but there was enough truth
in his position to make the movement irresistible.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Winds of Change
In order to bring pressure on the Legislature a
public meeting of farmers was called, composed
of all whose chief income was from the soil, the
call being issued by the Board of Agriculture. The
Board requested Governor Scales and me to
explain to the Convention its policy, its work in
the past and intentions in the future. We did so,
and were accorded a respectful hearing, with one
ill-mannered interruption by a delegate, although
it was evident that the friends of Colonel Polk
were present by concert, and were in the majority.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Winds of Change
Later in the meeting I was allowed to
answer some strictures on the scientific
teaching at the University. It was evident,
however, that the members had come
together with a prejudgment in favor of a
separate institution, and that at Raleigh.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Winds of Change
An adjourned meeting was held in the City
Hall. I was fully persuaded that the
movement would be successful and that
ultimately it would be best for the
University to surrender the fund rather than
have an endless wrangle on the subject.
We gave up the fund and a new land-grant
college was established.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Effect
What was the effect of the legislation in regard to
the University? The loss of $7,500 a year was a
serious matter but it had its compensations. (a) It
relieved us of the charge that we were defrauding
the farmers and mechanics, thereby creating much
odium against us. (b) It enabled us to avoid the
scandal of having a low standard of admission,
which was necessary for those intending to pursue
the "branches of learning relating to agriculture and
mechanic arts." Our critics used this to support the
charge that we did not have a true University.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Effect
(c) It enabled us to develop the institution along
the lines of the most approved universities--
Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Princeton, without
being embarrassed by the constant demand to
build stables and work shops, buy prize cattle and
modern machinery. (d) It relieved us of the almost
impossible task of governing in harmony bodies of
students of diverse training, modes of work, aims
in life.
Note: Virtually all the prose regarding Battle was taken verbatim from the History of the University of North
Carolina. Volume II: From 1868 to 1912, by Kemp Battle.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Failure of the
University of North
Carolina as the Land-grant
College
As viewed by Leonidas Polk
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Background Information
Born in Anson County, 1837 (died
1892)
Attended Davidson and studied
agriculture
Plantation Manager
Confederate Colonel
State Grange Leader
Influential in creating the Board of
Agriculture
President, National Farmers
Alliance
Founder, Progressive Farmer
U.S. Presidential Candidate,
Populist Party
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Truth
The University of North Carolina was never
serious about teaching agriculture
President Battle was primarily concerned
with using the land-grant funds to support
the general work of the university
He interpreted the Morrill Act to his own
way of thinking
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Agricultural Education
1823 - Governor Gabriel Holmes
recommended the purchase of a farm near
the University of North Carolina. The farm
was “to be put under the care of a scientific
and practical farmer” on which experiments
could be conducted. It didn’t happen.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Agricultural Education
1844 - Governor Morehead made a
recommendation similar to that of Holmes.
He also advocated the establishment of an
agricultural professorship at UNC or the
creation of a school where agriculture might
be taught.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Agricultural Education
In 1872 I called for "an agricultural college
somewhere in North Carolina…” At this
time the University of North Carolina was
closed
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Agricultural Education
1886 – this editoral appeared in the August
25 issue of Progressive Farmer:
"After a period of eleven years of laborious
effort, and with an expenditure of $82,500
of money given our people by the
government, …
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Editorial...
... we have at last succeeded in getting a
College of Agriculture and Mechanical
Arts. It is a model of architectural beauty
and admirably equipped in all its
departments. It is located on the forty-
eighth page of the catalog of the
University...
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Editorial...
...The catalog says that 'two courses are
offered' in this elegant paper college.
'Offered' is a good word! These 'courses'
we presume, have been 'offered' to our
farmer boys for these eleven years, but we
search the catalog in vain to find one who
has availed himself of the offer."
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Final Word
The people and the legislature spoke loudly
and clearly when North Carolina
Agricultural and Mechanical College was
created in 1887.
We finally had
a real Agricultural
College.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Early Days of NCSU
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
The Second Morrill Act
It was evident early on that the original
Morrill Act did not provide enough funds to
adequately establish the new colleges
land sold for less than expected
money couldn’t be used to erect buildings
original money was to serve as an endowment
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
2nd Morrill Act
Morrill introduced legislation providing
more money to support land-grant colleges
in:
1872
1873
and in six other years prior to 1890
The legislation failed each time
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
2nd Morrill Act
Why did the legislation fail?
Public’s perceptions of land-grant colleges was
less than favorable
Northerners didn’t want southern states to
benefit from the legislation because of
segregation
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
2nd Morrill Act
2nd Morrill Act finally passed in 1890
Three major components to the bill
• 1. Provided more funding for land grant colleges
Each state would have direct, annual appropriations
Sum would eventually reach $25,000 per year
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
2nd Morrill Act
Three major components to the bill
• 2. Greater accountability
subjects to be taught were specified:
“ instruction in agriculture, the mechanic arts, the
English language and the various branches of
mathematical, physical, natural, and economic
science, with special reference to their applications in
the industries of life, and to facilities for such
instruction’
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
2nd Morrill Act
Three major components to the bill
• 2. Greater accountability
More detailed annual reports required
“An annual report by the president of each of said
colleges shall be made to the Secretary of Agriculture,
as well as to the Secretary of the Interior, regarding
the condition and progress of each college, including
statistical information in relation to its receipts and
expenditures, its library, the number of its students
and professors, and also as to any improvements and
experiments made under the direction of any
experiment stations attached to said colleges”
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
2nd Morrill Act
Three major components to the bill
• 3. Black land grant colleges established
“no money shall be paid out under this act to any State or
Territory for the support and maintenance of a college
where a distinction of race or color is made in the
admission of students, but the establishment and
maintenance of such colleges separately for white and
colored students shall be held to be a compliance with the
provisions of this act if the funds received in such State or
Territory be equitably divided as hereinafter set forth”
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
2nd Morrill Act
Legislation said money should be divided
equitably
• There is a big difference between equal and
equitable
• State legislature was to determine what equitable
meant
• In the South, the word equitable meant the new land
grant colleges didn’t get much
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
2nd Morrill Act
After the passage of the 2nd Morrill Act,
NC State officials approached Shaw
University to see if they would teach a few
agriculture classes for black students. The
intent was to make Shaw the 1890
institution but give it a very limited role and
funding.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
2nd Morrill Act
North Carolina A&T State University was
established in 1891 as the second land grant
institution in North Carolina.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
1994 Land Grant Schools
The federal congress passed legislation in 1994
according land grant status to 29 tribally
controlled (Native American) colleges.
This was primarily so that could tap into funds for
extension purposes
There are none in North Carolina
Most of the colleges are in Montana, the Dakotas,
Minnesota, Wisconsin and New Mexico.
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Foundations of Agricultural and Extension Education
Related docs
Other docs by FH79FLx
Distance 20Learning 20via 20Compressed 20Video Averett 20College 20and 20USMC
Views: 1 | Downloads: 0
Get documents about "