Embed
Email

juvenile

Document Sample
juvenile
Shared by: HC11111104056
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/10/2011
language:
English
pages:
30
Juvenile Justice

English 4

Quick write

 If you committed a crime and you were

under the age of 18, do you think it would

be fair for you to be punished like an adult

who committed the same crime?

Key Concepts ?s

 What characteristics make a person an

adult, juvenile, or child? Who is a juvenile

and what qualities are different about a

juvenile compared to an adult or a child?

 Brainstorm a list of qualities that

characterize a juvenile but not an adult or

a child.

Definitions

 Homicide: killing of one person or another

either intentionally or unintentionally.

Includes accidents and murders.

 Murder: killing of someone with malice of

forethought. It could be done while

committing another crime. Murder is

always illegal.

 1st degree murder: killing of a person with

malice of forethought; the crime was planned.

 2nd degree murder: killing done during a crime

deemed very dangerous to a human life. The

crime was most likely not committed with the

intention of killing.

 Voluntary manslaughter: killing someone

intentionally but without malice of forethought.

 Involuntary manslaughter: killing someone

unlawfully but without malice of forethought

Definition differences

 Explain the differences in your own words

of the legal terms.

Matching Activity

 A 17 year old troubled girl has been slowly

poisoning her parents each night at

dinner. 3 months go by and she arrives

home to find them dead on the floor of

the kitchen. The coroner’s report indicated

their death was caused by Cyanide

poisoning.

 And her sentencing is…

sentencing

 Sentenced to life in prison without parole.

Situation 2

 Three 16 year olds were hangout out at

the park drinking Jack Daniels. One boy

starts shoving his friend. Soon the shoving

escalated into punching. One boy tripped

and his head hit a sharp-edged rock. He

died of a concussion before help can

arrive.

 And the sentencing is…

Sentencing

 Sentenced to 3 years in prison after being

tried as an adult.

Situation 2

 Thinking his girlfriend is cheating, a 16-

year-old boy goes to her house and finds

her in bed with his brother. Impulsively,

he grabs the nearest lamp and hits his

brother on the head. His brother dies from

a concussion two days later.

 And the sentencing is…

Sentencing

 Sentenced to 6 years in prison

Situation 4

 A 13 year old boy breaks into an auto

parts business to steal hubcaps. The 17

year old security guard picks up his boss’

gun and fires 2 warning shots at the thief.

The second shot hits the 13 year old and

kills him on the spot.

 And the sentencing is…

Sentencing

 Sentenced to 15 years to life.

Surveying the Texts

 What do the titles of the two articles “Kids are

Kids” and “Supreme court to Rule on Executing

Young Killers” tell you they will be about?

 “Kids are Kids” was published in The Sacramento

Bee. “Supreme Court to Rule was published in

The New York Times. What can you predict

about them based on their length of their

paragraphs? How do you think they will be the

same? How do you think they will be different?

 What issue do you think these articles are going

to discuss? What position do you think Kiptak

and Lundstrom will take?

Making Predictions

 What do you think “Supreme Court to Rule on

Executing Young Killers” is going to be about?

 What do you think is the purpose of this text?

 Who do you think is the intended audience for

this piece? How do you know this?

 Based on the title and other features of the text,

what information and ideas might this essay

present?

Read 1st 6 paragraphs

 What is Lundstrom’s opinion on that topic

of juvenile crime?

 Turn the title into a question to answer as

you read the essay

Key Vocabulary

 Constitutionality  Inconsistency

 Prosecutors  Quandary

 Demeanor  Heinous

 Remorse  Coddling

 Alienated  Perpetuating

 Nonchalant

 Plummeting

 Culpability

 Mitigating

1st reading

 Which of your predictions turned out to be true?

 What surprised you?

 As you read the articles, you will find that they

discuss 5 recent cases in which teenagers were

tried as adults for violent crimes.

 Defendant, Age, Crime, Sentence

 Highlight where the arguments are made in the

texts for or against punishing juveniles like

adults.

Rereading the Text

 Read playing the doubting game.

 Label what the author is saying in the left

hand margin: intro, issue or problem,

main arguments, examples, conclusion.

 Right hand margin, write your reactions

 Trade and discuss.

Why Thompson chose to use the

following words

 Massive (p7)  Reckless actions

 Wildfire (p7) (p10)

 Purged (p7)  Startling (p10)

 Violent passions (p7)  Delicate (p10)

 Rash actions (p7)  Drastic (p10)

 Vastly immature (p7)

 Erratic behavior (p9)

 Maelstrom (p10)

Sentences

 Thompson’s sentences are fairly long and

complex, but the last sentence in

paragraph 6 is short. Why is this sentence

so short?

Summary

 Write a summary of “many kids called

unfit for adult trial” by Greg Krikorian.

Logos

 What are Krikorian’s major claims and

assertions? Do you agree with his claims?

 Are any of his claims weak or

unsupported? Which one and why?

 Can you think of counter arguments that

Krikorian doesn’t consider?

Ethos

 Krikorian is reporting on a study by Thomas

Grisso. What is Grisso’s background? Do you

think he is trustworthy?

 Krikorian also quotes Laurence Steinburg. Who

is he? Is he a reliable person to interpret what

the study means?

 Krikorian is a staff writer for the LA Times who

frequenctly writes about legal issues. Does he

seem trustworthy to write about this topic?

Explain.

 Can you tell what Krikorian’s POV is, or can you

only tell the POV of the author of the study?

Pathos

 Does “Many kids” affect you emotionally?

Explain.

 Do you think Krikorian is trying to

manipulate your emotions? In what ways?

At what point?

 Do your emotions conflict with the logical

interpretation of the arguments?

Logos

 What are Thompson’s major claims and

assertions? Do you agree with his claims?

 Are any of his claims weak or

unsupported? Explain.

 Can you think of counter-arguments that

Thompson doesn’t consider?

Ethos

 What is Thompson’s background? Do you

think he is trustworthy?

 Does Thompson seem deceptive? Why or

why not?

 Can you tell what Thompson’s POV is?

Pathos

 Does “Startling Finds” affect you

emotionally? What parts?

 Do you think Thompson is trying to

manipulate your emotions? IN what ways?

At what point?

 Do your emotions conflict with the logical

interpretation of the arguments?

Writing Assignment

 Should teenagers accused of violent

crimes be tried and sentenced as adults?

Why or why not?

 Be sure to refer to and cite the reading

and your web-based research. You may

also use examples from your personal

experience or observations


Related docs
Other docs by HC11111104056
Newsletter 2088
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Polan final 30 nov
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Exclusion_Provider_List_for_DHHS_Website
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
vocal 20sets 202010
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Brooklyn 20Tech_Clubs 20_ 20Teams_2010 2011
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
life
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Poland_Research
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
azerbaijan
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Prison_Life__minimized_
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!