Embed
Email

Export_Control_Brief

Document Sample
Export_Control_Brief
Shared by: HC111111033253
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/10/2011
language:
English
pages:
22
EXPORT CONTROLS

(ITAR/EAR)

Overview and Implications for Research Universities

What is Export Control?

 Federal laws to protect items, technical data

and information important to the U.S.

 Laws have been in place for > 20 years

 More prominent since 9/11 resulting in

heightened scrutiny

Government’s Concern

 Open access/publication of scientific and

technological results may provide unwitting

assistance to nations or terrorist groups in

developing weapons

 Protecting economic interests of U.S.

companies

 Foreign policy

Regulating Agencies

 International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)

are administered by Dept of State

 Controls Defense related items

 Export Administration Regulations (EAR) are

administered by Dept of Commerce

 Controls most other items

 Numerous other regulatory agencies control exports

such as Dept of Treasury (money), DOE (Nucs),

DOJ (drugs), USDA (seeds)

Purposes

 Control access of certain technology to foreign nationals

whether in US or abroad.

 “Deemed export” will be the primary focus for research @

CSU. Defined as: The release of technology or software to a

foreign national within the U.S. is considered an export to

the home country of that foreign national.

 Currently doesn’t apply to U.S. citizens, individuals granted

permanent residence status and certain protected individuals.

 National Security classified information adds a whole

different dimension to issue.

 Failure to comply can result in criminal as well as civil

penalties.

 Increased emphasis since 9/11—move to DHS and more

compliance agents being hired

What is Affected

 All items/technology in the U.S. except:

 Publicly available technology & software

 Publications that are artistic or non-technical in nature

 Items/technology located outside of the U.S.:

 Items of U.S. origin wherever located

 Foreign made items if it exceeds certain % U.S. content or

direct product of U.S. technology

General Provisions

 Prohibits certain exports, reexports and other conduct without a

license, license exception or determination that no license is required.

 A license is a pre-approval to export. (ITAR & EAR)

 Usually valid for 4 years

 Applies to a specific item to a specific country

 In the end, few items covered by EAR need a license—however, must

go through process to make the determination and be able to defend

decision.

 A Technical Assistance Agreement (TAA) (ITAR) is an agreement for

the performance of a defense service or the disclosure of technical

data. Most likely vehicle we’ll use @ CSU to get foreign researchers

approved. A TAA does not authorize unrestricted publication-only an

approval for the listed foreign person to work on the specific project.

Questions to Consider

 What is the technology?

 Must know the specifics-will require help of PI and/or

sponsor.

 Who is going to be working on project?

 What nationality and status

 Certain countries are embargoed by both agencies: Cuba,

Libya, Sudan, Iran, Iraq

 Where is the work going to be accomplished?

 On/off CSU property?

 If in CSU offices/labs-who has access?

Fundamental Research/

Public Domain

 Information in the Public Domain is not controlled.

 Fundamental research in science and engineering at

accredited institutions where resulting information is

ordinarily published and shared broadly is considered

Public Domain.

 However, university research will not be considered

Fundamental Research if:

 The university or its researchers accept other restrictions on

publication, or

 The research is funded by the U.S. Government and

specific access & dissemination controls are applicable

Challenges

 EAR is not as simple as just looking at the

nationality.

 Very dependent upon the specific technology—some

countries can receive some items

 Time factor in determining requirements and then

applying for and receiving licenses-could be as long

as 90-120 days—depending on outside agency review

 ITAR is simpler in that it considers all foreign

nationals equally as “dangerous”, however, specific

technology is still a major consideration.

Thoughts to Consider

 Export control laws apply whether or not

there is a specific reference in the award

document.

 Applies not only to the PI and assigned

researchers-need to consider where

information is accessible (labs/computers) &

control of information from other foreign

persons.

Additional Considerations

 Technology Control Management Plans

 Outlines how the controlled technology will be

handled/secured to prevent access by unapproved

foreign persons. Will be required even if there

are no foreign persons assigned to the project.

 Addresses physical security of labs & other work

areas as well as security of data on computer

networks.

Recent Developments

Department of Commerce

 Dept of Commerce IG published report in

March 2004 titled-”Export Controls May Not

Stop the Transfer of Sensitive Technology to

Foreign Nationals in the US”

 Consortium of 12 universities led by MIT

responded in July with a letter to DOC

Undersecretary for Industry & Security

expressing serious concerns

Major Issues with DOC IG

 “..technology relating to controlled equipment-

regardless of how “use” is defined-is subject to the

deemed export provisions (and the requirement to

license foreign nationals having access to that

equipment) even if the research being conducted

with that equipment is fundamental”

 Report suggests that the deemed export policy

should take into account all the nationalities a

foreign national has ever maintained.

Department of Defense

 DOD IG published findings in March 25, 2004 “Export-

Controlled Technology at Contractor, University and

Federally Funded Research & Development Center

Facilities”

 DOD program & contracts officers should have higher level

of accountability and more limited ability to “drop” clauses

based on fundamental research exclusion.

 Actual language of clause still under development, therefore

implications remain unclear.

 Concern that program & contracts officers will default to

overly restrictive language to limit their liability.

Recommended Actions

 Develop CSU policy for dealing with export provisions

 Outline responsibility of SP administrators,

PIs/Depts, Export Advisor

 Will need to put more burden on PIs and the sponsor

to assist with identification of technology.

 Process will involve several offices such as: SP, PIs,

Depts, Research Deans, OVPRIT and possibly

General Counsel.

 Post policies & training materials on web site

 Educate SP, Research Deans and Depts on general

guidelines of EAR/ITAR and CSU policy.

Discussion Items

 Publication restrictions and impact on Grad

students/PIs working on project

 Administrative process/burden

 TAAs and Technology Control Plans are time consuming

to prepare. Requires additional interaction between PI and

sponsor to determine what technology is controlled.

 Approval process by Federal Gov’t can take 8-10 weeks.

 Security of labs/work areas/computers & network

U.S. Munitions List (Part 121)

Category

I- Firearms, Close Assault Weapons, & Combat Shotguns

II- Guns & Armament

III- Ammunition/Ordnance

IV- Launch Vehicles, Guided Missiles, Ballistic Missiles, Rockets, Torpedoes,

Bombs and Mines

V- Explosives and Energetic Materials, Propellants, Incendiary Agents and

Their Constituents

VI- Vessels of War and Special Naval Equipment

VII- Tanks and Military Vehicles

VIII- Aircraft and Associated Equipment

IX- Military Training Equipment

U.S. Munitions List (Part 121) cont’

X- Protective Personnel Equipment

XI- Military Electronics

XII- Fire Control, Range Finder, Optical and Guidance and Control Equipment

XIII- Auxiliary Military Equipment

XIV- Toxicological Agents, Including Chemical Agents, Biological Agents,

and Associated Equipment

XV- Spacecraft Systems and Associated Equipment

XVI- Nuclear Weapons, Design and Testing Related Items

XVII- Classified Articles, Technical Data and Defense Services Not Otherwise

Enumerated

XVIII- Directed Energy Weapons

XIX- Not Used

U.S. Munitions List (Part 121) cont’

XX- Submersible Vessels, Oceanographic and Associated Equipment

XXI- Miscellaneous Articles

EAR Categories

0- Nuclear Materials, Facilities & Equipment & Miscellaneous

1- Materials, Chemicals, Microorganisms and Toxins

2- Materials Processing

3- Electronics Design, Development and Production

4- Computers

5- Telecommunications & Information Security

6- Sensors and Lasers

7- Navigation and Avionics

8- Marine (ships & vessels)

9- Propulsion Systems, Space Vehicles and Related Equipment


Other docs by HC111111033253
APEC 201990
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
BE 20CSE
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
J _W _Booth
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Brooklyn 20Tech_Clubs 20_ 20Teams_2010 2011
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
20080814_DIMHRS_HR_Executive_Overview_KTO
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
outline
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
msc cs 2003 2005 19june3 final
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
sumit_khemka_resume
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
AP 20Summer 20Assignment
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
101 PPT Day13 su08
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!